LIBER FEODORUM

( 637 )

A.D. 1242-1243.

A very large part of the Book of Fees is occupied by transcripts of documents of the year 1242 and the earlier part of 1243. Although the kings expedition to Gascony in the former year had no great military or political results, it led to the preparation of a number of returns which are of considerable value in connexion with the history of tenures in England.

Tenants in chief by military service or by serjeanty, persons in occupation of the escheated lands of Normans and Bretons, and persons holding of minors in the king's wardship were alike ordered to assemble at Winchester on the 27th of April, 1242, furnished with horses and arms, in order to accompany the king into Poitou. [1 ] A few days before sailing from Portsmouth, with eight earls and some three hundred knights, Henry III committed the governance of the realm to the Archbishop of York, with the Bishop of Carlisle and William de Cantelou as his councillors. [2]

We are not here concerned with the measures taken with regard to such tenants in chief as failed to appear at the muster. Nor is it necessary to discuss the financial arrangements of the time, after premising that, on this occasion, the stewards of the great lords were not required to act as collectors on behalf of the king. The duties which had been entrusted to them in 1235 were now laid upon the sheriffs. Payn de Clermund, who had taken upon himself to distrain his tenant, William Hayrun, was summoned to justify himself before the barons of the Exchequer. [3] In a few cases only, tenants in chief were empowered to levy scutage on their vassals on behalf of the king. The documents printed below from original returns, or from transcripts in the Book of Fees, deal almost exclusively with tenures. In the course of a few months, there were no less than three enquiries on this subject, so similar in character that in many cases it is difficult to determine whether a particular return was made under a writ of May, of October, or of December, 1242.

On the 19th of May, the Archbishop of York issued writs in the king's name directing the different sheriffs throughout England to levy, before the 12th of October, three marks apiece from all fees held of tenants in chief who could not produce writs of scutage, and from all fees held of minors in the king's wardship. For the present purpose it is more material to notice the later part of the writ:-

" Interim autem diligenter inquiras quot huiusmodi feoda teneantut' in balliva tua de singulis tenentibus de nobis in capite et de wardis in manu nostra existentibus, tam de novo feoffamento quam de veteri. ut baronea de scaccario ad prefatum terminum inde distinct e et apertc possis certificare." [4]


[1] Close Rolls, 1237-1249, pp. 431, 435.
[2] Matthew Paris, Chronica Majora, vol. iv. pp. 191, 192; Annales Monastici. vol.i.p. 122; vol. ii. pp. 89, 329; vol. hi. p. 158; Rymer, Faedera, vol. i. pp. 244. 240.
[3] Memoranda Roll, L. T. R. no. 14. in. 3rf.
[4] Close Rolls, 1237-1242. p. 486.

638 A.D. 1242-1243.

Upon this it is necessary to explain that those tenants in chief who had duly appeared at the muster with their proper quota of men and horses prepared for war were entitled to have writs authorising them to receive scutage at the rate of three marks apiece on the fees held of them. The Scutage Roll of 1242 gives the names of more than seventy earls and other great men who obtained such writs. The names of some thirty more are entered on the Close Roll. [1] It should also be observed that the sheriffs were only required to state the number of fees belonging to particular tenants.

By further writs issued on the same day, the sheriffs were directed to distrain all tenants in chief by military service or by serjeanty who had disregarded the royal summons, and all persons holding a knight's fee in demesne or land to the yearly value of 20l. who had not taken knighthood. Lists of all such defaulters were to be prepared and sent to the Regent.

The main object of the writs issued on the 29th of October, 1242, was to impress upon the sheriffs the necessity of collecting all arrears of the scutage and paying the money into the Exchequer before the 7th of December. A fresh enquiry concerning persons who held fees under tenants in chief or wards of the Crown was, however, ordered, in words copied from the writ of the 19th of May, with an important addition requiring not merely the number of such fees but details as to their locality and their tenure (in quibus villis et de cuius honore). The sheriffs were also to give the names of any persons resisting the scutage or the enquiry. [2]

A few days after the latest date at which the returns to the writs of October should have been delivered at Westminster, fresh writs were issued from the Exchequer ordering a third series of local returns, the enquiry to be made this time upon the oaths of twelve good and lawful men, knights or others, who could be held responsible if found negligent or partial. According to the writs, the juries had simply to ascertain the number of fees in each county, whether held directly of the Crown or of mesne lords who in turn held of the Crown. The writs were, however, accompanied indefinite instructions which explained and enlarged the scope of the enquiry. Returns were demanded as to the tenant, the overlord, and the locality of every fee, and the honour of which it formed part. Particulars were also required as to the number and locality of the fees in each county held of any chief honour situate therein. The sheriffs were furthermore directed to prepare separate rolls, hundred by hundred, enumerating the remaining towns of the county, that is to say those which were not held by military service, and stating the names of the owners and their respective tenures. They were also required to exact the scutage from all defaulters, and to deliver the money and the inquisitions at the Exchequer by the 27th of January, 1243. Some of the tenants in chief, however, who had obtained writs empowering them to levy scutage from their own knights seem to have claimed exemption from this enquiry, and the controversy was eventually decided in their favour. [3] According to the contemporary enrolment, the writs were issued from the Exchequer to a limited number of sheriffs on the 9th of December. Two of the originals which have survived are dated the 12th of December, and as one of these is directed to the sheriff of Wilts, who is not named in the enrolment, it seems


[1] Close Rolls, 1237-1212, pp. 488-493, 507, 508, 521-523.
[2] Memoranda Roll, L.T.R. no. 14. m. 3; Madox, History of the Exchequer (ed. 1711, p. 473.
[3] Memoranda Roll, as above, m. 5; Mitchell, Studies in Taxation, p. 234.

INTRODUCTION. 639

probable that writs were sent to all the sheriffs alike. In support of this, it may be observed that although there is no mention in the enrolment of the issue of a writ to the sheriff of Norfolk and Suffolk, we have lists of serjeanties in those counties which may be assigned to December 1242, or January 1243.

If the different sheriffs had confined themselves strictly to giving the information demanded of them, we might have for every county:-

In pursuance of the writs of May 1242:-

A list of tenants in chief, stating the number of the fees held of each. [1]

In pursuance of the writs of October 1242:-

A list of tenants in chief, stating the number and specifying the locality of the fees held of each and the honour to which they belonged, with the names of all resistors.

In pursuance of the writs and instructions of December 1242:-

A general list of fees, specifying their locality, their owner, their overlord, and the honour to which they belonged, wheresoever it was situate.

A list of persons holding chief honours in the county, with particulars as to the number and locality of the fees in the county belonging to each.

A separate list of towns held by serjeanty or the like, with the names of the owners and their overlords.

With reference to the writs of May 1242, it may be observed that a sheriff could hardly prepare an accurate statement of the number of fees belonging to a particular lord without knowing where they were situate, and perhaps also the names of the tenants in actual possession. Having this information, he would naturally insert it in his return to the Exchequer. The sheriff of Somerset and Dorset is the only one who is known to have furnished the bald statistics required by the writ without adding the names of places.

None of the lists printed below are specifically described as returns to the writs of October 1242. For practical purposes, the returns made in the spring and autumn of that year must have been superseded by those made in pursuance of the writs and instructions of December. To this last category belong all the lists of places not held by military service, and, presumably, most of the lists of fees resulting from inquisitions taken hundred by hundred.

Although some of the documents printed below are not exactly in the forms prescribed by the writs and instructions, there is no reason to doubt their connexion with the scutage of Gascony. Some indeed are not of the nature of returns to any of the writs of 1242, having been prepared for the assistance of the sheriffs in the collection of the tax. Many of the lists show traces of having been examined at the Exchequer as vouchers to the sheriffs' accounts.

The fines exacted from tenants in chief who did not go to Gascony are recorded on the normal Pipe Rolls of the period, but the accounts of the scutage collected by the sheriffs were entered on a separate roll, which has long since disappeared. The Pipe Roll of 1244 contains several references to sums due " de auxilio ad transfretacionem regis in Wasconiam sicut continetur in rotulo compotorum eiusem auxilii."

KENT. There are two lists of fees in this county dating from the later part of the year 1242. The first of them is divided into six sections, each


[1] The lists of defaulters ordered by the second writ of the 19th of May were not made returnable at the Exchequer.

640 A.D. 1242-1243.

dealing with a separate lathe. In these different sections, an attempt has been made to group together the fees of particular tenants in chief. On the back of the roll there is a series of lists relating to the counties of Lancaster, Salop, Stafford. Northumberland and Worcester, all belonging to the same year. An endorsement specifically connects the whole document with the expedition to Gascony. The internal evidence of the list for Kent is also confirmatory. There is mention in it of the heirs of Hamon de Valognes and Roger Malemains. The former of these persons seems to have died shortly before the 10th of September, and the latter shortly before the 11th of November. 1242. [1] Robert of Barming, who is mentioned as an actual tenant, obtained livery of his lands in September 1242. [2]

The second list printed below deals with the whole of Kent as a single unit, and brings together all the fees of each tenant in chief. Although it appears to be directly founded on the other list, there are some variants which show some independent knowledge. This is the list which was used for purposes of audit, as evinced by marginal notes made by clerks at the Exchequer. There is attached to it a small schedule of uncertain date concerning fees held by the Earl of Cornwall in right of his wife, Isabel relict of Gilbert, Earl of Gloucester. This lady died in 1240, but, Richard of Clare, the heir to the Earldom of Gloucester, being under age, the Earl of Cornwall was allowed to retain his interest in these fees, and he was empowered to levy scutage on them in 1242. [3]

SURREY. There are two versions of a list of fees in this county made in connexion with the scutage of 1242. The sequence of the names and the particulars given are identical. The only material difference between the versions is that one of them contains divergent statements as to the fees of the Honour of Mandeville at Clapham and Carshalton. While William de Fednes appears as the under-tenant of these manors in both the documents, one of them has an additional section in which Ingram de Fiennes is entered as the owner of part of the estate. It is difficult to ascertain the exact date at which Ingram de Fiennes succeeded his father William. Two rolls of the Exchequer suggest that William was dead at Michaelmas 1241. [4] On the other hand, two rolls of the Chancery seem to show that he was living in the spring of 1242, and he was returned in the summer or autumn of that year as holding lands in Somerset and Buckinghamshire. [5]

The two versions being so similar, only one of them is printed below, but variants in the other are given in footnotes, most of them consisting of marginal memoranda made at the Exchequer.

SUSSEX. There are two versions of a list of fees in this county. One. bearing a date, is written on the back of the longer list for Surrey in continuation of it; the other is in the hand of the clerk who wrote the shorter list for Surrey mentioned above. The text now printed is that of the former, but the other version has been collated, and all important variants have been noted.


[1] Excerpta e Rotulis Finium, vol. i. pp. 384, 388.
[2] Ibid. p. 385.
[3] Close Rolls, 1237-1242. pp. 477, 492.
[4] K.R. Memoranda Rolls, 26 Hen. III, mm. 11, 16; 27 Hen. III, m. 1.
[5] Close Rolls. 1242-1247, pp. 114, 161; Scutage Roll, no.6. See pp. 752. 870, below.

INTRODUCTION. 641

SOUTHAMPTON. An extant list of fees and serjeanties in this county seems to have been drawn up in pursuance of the writ issued early in December 1242. It is, however, defective. The membrane that should bear a general heading for the whole roll has disappeared; many tenants in chief and many places are unnoticed. The loss of part of the return must have occurred at a very early period, for the six membranes that survive are the only ones that were known to the compilers of the Book of Fees. The different sections are printed below in the order in which they are given in that work, although there are grounds for suspecting that the membranes were re-arranged by the transcribers. If the document is actually that which was prepared in the county, the sheriff must have disregarded the instruction that the list of places not held by military service should be on a roll separate from that containing the list of fees.

WILTS. There are several documents extant relating to the enquiries made in this county in connexion with the scutage of Gascony:-

(1) A list of fees and of their respective tenants, grouped under the names of the overlords, presumably drawn up by the sheriff in pursuance of a writ of May or October 1242. Fulk Basset, who is mentioned in it as holding Compton and Marden, succeeded his brother Gilbert in the summer of 1241. [1] John Je Evesque {Episcopus), another tenant mentioned, was dead in January 1243. [2]

(2) An abstract of the foregoing, made by a clerk of the Exchequer named Richard. As this does not contain any additional information whatever, the first and last entries only are printed below.

(3) A list of fees and of their respective tenants, grouped under the names of the overlords, to which is attached the writ of 12 December, 1242, but without the instructions that accompanied it. This list is wholly independent of the earlier one, being founded upon inquisitions taken in the several hundreds. Compton mentioned above is here stated to be in the possession of Reynold de Mohun, who had recently married Isabel, relict of Gilbert Basset. [3] A mention of Henry Engaine as mesne tenant of Chalfield during the lifetime of his father, Viel, must not be taken to cast any doubt upon tiie date of the list.

(4) A copy of part of the foregoing, written on the back of a list for Berkshire. This is not printed separately below.

(5) A list of lands and towns not held by military service. This was clearly made in pursuance of the instructions issued in December 1242.

(6) Two inquisitions as to fees and tenures in certain hundreds. Inasmuch as the findings of the local juries here recorded are not incorporated in the general list of fees (No. 3 above), or in the general list of serjeanties, etc. (No. 5 above), these inquisitions must be regarded as supplementary thereto. In other words, in order to make a complete list of the holdings of the chief barons in Wiltshire, it is necessary to add those specified herein to those specified in the general list.

SOMERSET AND DORSET. Two meagre and discrepant returns from these linked counties are printed below.


[1] Excerpta e Rolulis Finium, vol. i. pp. 349, 350; Close Rolls, 1237-1242, pp. 324, 328; Matthew Paris, Chronica Majora, vol. iv. p. 89.
[2] Excerpta e Rutulis Finium, vol. i. pp. 392, 394; Close Rolls. 1242-1247, pp. 84, 88.
[3] Close Rolls, 1242-1247, p. 129; Calendar of Inquisitions, vol. i. p. 141.

642 A.D. 1242-1243.

One, here printed second, is a list of tenants in chief, giving the number of their respective fees, without any particulars as to the locality of such fees or their tenants. This must have been made in pursuance of the writ of May 1242.

The other list is considerably longer, in that it specifies the locality of certain fees. It does not, however, give the names of the tenants in possession, and the information supplied with regard to some of the principal tenants in chief does not satisfy the requirements of the writs of October or December 1242. Nevertheless, it appears to belong to that year. Margery fitz Payn, who is mentioned in it, obtained the custody of the lands of her deceased husband in 1237. [1] Attention may be drawn to the mention in it of the guardians of the heirs of John le Daneys, who seems to have died in 1241, leaving daughters under age. [2] Sabina de Lorty, described as the heir of Richard Revel, did homage in the spring of 1242, after the death of her husband. [3] Catherine of Montagu, another person mentioned as living, was dead in November 1244. [4]

DEVON. The Book of Fees contains transcripts of inquisitions as to tenures in the hundreds of Lifton, Witheridge, Budleigh with Ottery, Stanborough, Haytor and Ermington, which appear to be connected with the scutage of Gascony. All the originals are still extant, having slits for the parchment tags that formerly bore the seals of the jurors. Within the several hundreds, there is no grouping of the fees of particular persons, but exceptional tenures are entered separately. Although none of these inquisitions are dated, the internal evidence narrows the period to which they can be assigned. John de Courtenay, who is mentioned frequently in them as the owner of the barony of Okehampton, did not obtain livery of his lands until the autumn of 1242. [5] Hugh Peverel, mentioned as an under-tenant, obtained livery of the lands which he held in chief in September of that year. [6] On the other hand, Catherine of Montagu, mentioned as the owner of the barony, or honour, of Chisleborough, was dead in November 1244. [7] There is therefore no reason to doubt that the six inquisitions printed below were taken in pursuance of one of the writs issued early in December 1242.

It is unfortunate that the inquisitions taken in the majority of the hundreds of Devon had disappeared before the compilation of the Book of Fees. The defect is, however, to some extent remedied by a list of fees throughout the county, which is explicitly stated to have been prepared by the king's order in the 27th year of his reign. In this list, the fees are grouped under the names of the tenants in chief. Although it covers a much larger area than the surviving inquisitions, its scope is narrower. The episcopal fees, and lands held in frank almoin, in socage, or by serjeanty, are omitted. Mesne tenants are ignored, presumably because the scutage of 1242 was leviable only on the persons in actual possession of fees or fractions of fees.

An examination of this general list of fees reveals the fact that those of each tenant in chief are grouped according to the hundreds in which they


[1] Close Rolls, 1237-1242, p. 14.
[2] Ibid. p. 303; Excerpta e Rotulis Finium. vol. i. pp. 340, 305.
[3] Excerpta e. Rotulis Finium, vol i. pp. 92, 376.
[4] Ibid. p. 426.
[5] Ibid. p. 388; Close Rolls, 1237-1242, p. 460; 1212-1217, p 1.
[6] Excerpta e Rotulis Finium, vol. i. p. 384.
[7] Ibid. p. 420.

INTRODUCTION. 643

were situate. Furthermore, a collation of it with the six extant inquisitions shows that within each hundred the sequence of names is almost identical. There are also various minor coincidences in matters of statement and phraseology. The clear inference therefore is that the sheriff, or his clerk, compiled the general list of fees from the original inquisitions, going through them one by one and picking out the fees held of each tenant in chief. Such a procedure might naturally be expected, being in fact similar to that adopted in the preparation of Domesday Book. In a few cases, the compiler of the list made deliberate alterations, based upon local knowledge. Thus he supplements the inadequate finding of the jurors of Haytor that John le Baron held half a fee of the honour of Bradninch by a statement that it was at Buckland. It is uncertain whether his substitution of Geoffrey de la Hoke and Ives de Servinton for their respective ' heirs ' mentioned by the jurors was intentional or accidental. Anyhow, a theory which has been propounded that the inquisitions are later than the general list, and that these two persons died during the interval, [1] appears untenable. The heading of the last section of the general list specifically mentions the ' inquisitions ' and is shortly followed by a statement as to two fees in Broad Hempston which is copied verbatim from the inquisition for the hundred of Haytor.

HEREFORD. The original writ of 9 December, 1242, to the sheriff of Herefordshire and the accompanying schedule of instructions are still extant. In pursuance of these, inquisitions were taken in the several hundreds of the county, and the originals of these have also been preserved. In their present order, the inquisition for the hundred of Leominster comes first, bearing date the 22nd of January 1243 and giving the names of the jurors responsible for it. The other nine inquisitions are in a different hand, undated, and somewhat different in form. This series of documents gives a list of the various holdings, sometimes estimated in hides, with the names of the tenants in possession, of the mesne lords if any, of the overlords, and of the honours to which they respectively belonged. They also state the nature of the tenure, whether knight service, serjeanty, socage, or frank almoin.

From these inquisitions, the sheriff or his clerk prepared a roll of fees, which is also extant. It deals only with such lands as were held by knight service, and it arranges them under the chief lords or honours to which they pertained. A comparison of the roll with the inquisitions shows that the compiler went through the latter systematically, picking out from them in turn the entries relating to each overlordship or honour. The process can be followed by the sequence of the names, and verbal coincidences may also be observed. The entries in the roll are often shorter than the corresponding entries in the inquisitions, mesne tenants being ignored. On the other hand, the compiler sometimes adds information, and he often converts the hidage of the inquisitions into knights' fees, usually, but not always, at the rate of five hides to a fee. There are also some interesting variants in the spelling of proper names. The omission from the roll of some entries concerning the honours of Gloucester and Wilton may have been accidental. The fees of the Bishop of Hereford are not mentioned, presumably because he did not pay through the sheriff. The omission of fees held directly of the king is more remarkable, and it suggests that the roll is imperfect.

No traces have been found of the second roll, in which the sheriff was


[1] Transactions of the Devonshire Association, vol. xxxv. p. 279.

644 A.D. 1242-1243.

directed to enumerate the places in his county which were held otherwise than by military service; the material for it is scattered in the original inquisitions which he sent to the Exchequer. In this connexion it may be observed that, according to an early endorsement printed below, the file containing the returns from Herefordshire seems to have formerly consisted of nineteen ' pieces,' or membranes, exclusive of the writ and instructions. There are now not more than fourteen, but these comprise all the material used in the Book of Fees, more than six centuries ago.

GLOUCESTER. Such returns as were made from this county in 1242 had disappeared before the compilation of the Book of Fees. The transcribers have, however, preserved a statement as to the levy of the scutage of Gascony in the bailiwick of Cirencester, at the rate of three marks on the fee.

OXFORD. The documents relating to the scutage of Gascony for this county fall under two heads. There is in the first place the writ of December 1242 addressed to the sheriff, followed by an inquisition taken in pursuance of it, and there is in the second place a list of fees grouped under their chief lords. Both of these documents present certain peculiarities, and the relation between them is uncertain.

The writ will be found to differ slightly from others issued at the same time and for the same purpose, and the inquisition appears to have been taken by one jury for the whole county, not by separate juries for the different hundreds according to the more usual practice. The fees in each hundred are, however, enumerated consecutively, the four and a half hundreds of Binfield, Langtree, Lewknor, Pirton and Ewelmeand and the manor of Benson being grouped under the collective name of Chiltern. Although the sheriff had been ordered, to hold his enquiry " as well within liberties as without," nothing was done by him in the hundreds of Banbury, Thame and Dorchester, which belonged to the Bishop of Lincoln. A second section of the inquisition deals, hundred by hundred, with lands held by serjeanty, and a third deals similarly with lands held in frank almoin or by uncertain tenures. On the dorse of the last membrane of the inquisition there is a list of tenants in chief in the county who obtained writs of scutage.

The list of fees arranged under their overlords would naturally have been compiled from the local inquisition, but a close examination shows it to contain various particulars which are not derived from the other document. It has, for instance, an entry stating that Margery de Reviers held Nuneham in demesne, although the inquisition for the hundred of Bullingdon makes no mention of her or of that place. In some cases it supplies the surnames of the tenants or the names of the mesne lords. The compiler must therefore have had access to some sources of information now unknown. Certain entries in the inquisitions are omitted in the classified list of fees, either by accident or of set purpose. The most important omission is that of the honours of Wallingford and St. Valery, both belonging to Richard, Earl of Cornwall, who seems to have levied the scutage therein through his own officers.

BERKS. The documents concerning the scutage of Gascony in this county fall into three divisions, and it is difficult to establish the connexion between them.

(1) There are two versions of a general list of fees, giving the names of the places and of their owners and giving also the amounts of the services due, but not giving the names of overlords or baronies. They differ slightly in

INTRODUCTION. 645

form, and one of them, presumably made at the Exchequer, contains also lists of certain fees in Worcestershire and Northamptonshire which have nothing to de with the list for Berkshire. The manuscripts of both versions are noted as being " in libro," but in point of fact the compilers of the Book of Fees simply copied the inferior one. The text printed below is taken from the earlier and better version, and it has not been considered necessary to collate the other. The arrangement of the list appears to be according to hundreds. It does not satisfy the requirements of any of the known writs of 1242.

(2) There is a list of fees in Berkshire, arranged more or less according to hundreds and giving the names of the overlords as well as those of the tenants in possession. On the back of it a different scribe has copied part of one of the contemporary returns from Wiltshire. To this document is attached a membrane enumerating certain other fees, the lords of which had obtained writs of respite or scutage, and containing a reference to a writ of respite issued early in October 1242. There are grounds for believing that both these documents were prepared in connexion with the writ sent to the sheriff at the end of that month, although the longer of them does not group the fees under the names of the tenants in chief. This writ orders the sheriff to return the names of any tenants ' resisting' him, and one such name is endorsed on the second membrane.

(3) In obedience to the writ and instructions of December 1242, the sheriff of Berkshire caused two rolls to be prepared, the one giving a list of the knights' fees in the county grouped under the names of the tenants in chief, the other enumerating the places which were not held by military service. The names of the jurors responsible are prefixed to each of the lists; eleven of them occur in both. Marginal notes show that the roll of fees here mentioned is that which was used at the Exchequer at the audit of the sheriff's account.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. None of the original returns made from those linked counties in connexion with the scutage of Gascony have been preserved. The Book of Fees, however, contains transcripts of several documents which appear to have been prepared after the issue of the writs of October or December 1242. The date is evidenced by their general character and by the mention of Walter Marshal as Earl of Pembroke, his elder brother, Gilbert, having been killed on the 27th of June in that year. Regarded broadly, the lists printed below are divisible into three sections, of which the first and second are complementary to each other.

The first section deals with such places as did not pertain to the specific liberties and baronies which form the subject of the second section. It thus enumerates fees held directly of the king, fees held of various overlords not named in the second section, and lands held otherwise than by military service. It contains at least one reference to the inquisitions upon which it must have been based, and the arrangement is topographical, according to hundreds, taken in the following order:- Willey, Flitt, Barford, Stodden, Radbornestoke, Manshead, Biggleswade, Wixamtree and Clifton, in Bedfordshire; (1) Stodfold, Roulowe and La Mewe; (2) Mulshoe, Seglowe and Bonestowe; (3) Ashendon, Ixhill and Waddesdon; (4) Risborough, Stone and Aylesbury; (5) Yardley, Cottesloe and Muresley; (6) Stoke, and Desborough, in Buckinghamshire. A page and a half in the Book of Fees which should have dealt with the hundred of Burnham have been left blank, with a note - 'deficit' in the margin.

646 A.D. 1242-1243.

The second section deals with twelve groups of fees arranged under the names of the baronies of which they were held. One of these groups relating to fees held of William de Say is due to a mistake on the part of the compiler, other fees held of William de Say being, as he admits, entered in the first section (in alio rotulo). A few other defects may also be observed. Four of the baronies are described as ' liberties,' and it is probable that the lists of fees belonging to them were supplied by their respective stewards.

The third section is not an independent return, being merely a series of extracts made for the purpose of enumerating the fees held of certain overlords who had obtained writs of scutage. It supplies some information about places in the hundred of Burnham, obviously derived from the part of the local return which is not transcribed in the Book of Fees.

Between the second and third sections there is a short list of fees from which the Earl of Cornwall received the scutage. Some of these fees are included in the list of the fees of the Countess of Oxford in the second section, while others occur in the corrupt text of the list of the fees of Earl Richard. Beyond noting that Earl Richard still retained an interest in those fees of Clare which had formed part of the dower of his deceased wife, nothing certain can be said as to the nature of this list.

The text of the lists for Bedfordshire and Buckinghamshire is extremely unsatisfactory. One important lacuna in it has been mentioned above, and the whole piece relating to the fees of the Earl of Cornwall is in its present form unintelligible. The marginal entries are complicated throughout, and it has been found necessary to re-arrange them to some extent for the purpose of the present edition. Nothing short of a facsimile could reproduce them exactly.

MIDDLESEX. The first of the two documents printed below in connexion with the scutage of Gascony in this county is a curiously worded list of fees giving the names of the tenants in possession and the overlords. It concludes with a list of resisters prepared in pursuance of the writ of October 1242. The second document is a copy of the account rendered by the sheriffs of London from such of the fees specified in the other list as were not held of persons who had obtained writs of scutage.

ESSEX AND HERTFORD. The information given with regard to the scutage of Gascony in these counties is scanty. All the original documents have long since disappeared, and the Book of Fees supplies nothing more than abstracts of the accounts rendered by the sheriff and by the bailiff of the hundred of Rochford. In these accounts there is of course no mention of fees held of persons who had obtained writs of scutage. Furthermore, they de not even name the fees held of great barons who had not obtained such writs, and whose tenants were consequently liable. Such particulars as are given with regard to tenures are only in respect of the smaller estates. The sheriff himself, Richard de Munfichet, had obtained a writ of scutage by sending two knights in his own stead to Gascony. [1]

NORFOLK AND SUFFOLK. The Book of Fees supplies for each of these counties a list of fees from which the sheriff might levy scutage for the king, in both of them the arrangement is according to baronies or overlordship. There are also lists of lands held by serjeanty, presumably copied from the


[1] Close Rolls, 1237-1242, pp. 493, 522.

INTRODUCTION. 647

'other roll' prescribed by the instructions of December 1242. The Liberty of the abbey of St. Edmund is treated separately.

CAMBRIDGE AND HUNTINGDON. Two documents connected with the levy of the scutage of Gascony in these counties are printed below. The first is a list of fees held of the king or of lords who had not obtained writs of scutage. The second, very similar in character, has additions showing the amounts levied from the different tenants in possession and paid into the Treasury. Marginal notes show it to have been used in connexion with the audit of the sheriff's account. Most of the discrepancies between the two lists are due to the fact that the fees ascribed in one to the Honour of Payn Peverel are in the other divided between the baronies of Gilbert Peche and Hugh de Dive, two of the co- heirs. There are no returns of the fees held of persons who had obtained writs of scutage, or of lands held otherwise than by military service.

NORTHAMPTON. None of the original returns from this county in connexion with the scutage of 1242 have been preserved. The Book of Fees, however, contains transcripts of three lists of fees in Northamptonshire which evidently date from that year. For convenience they may be called A, B and C. In all three the fees are grouped under the names of the tenants in chief, and in other respects a very close resemblance may be observed between them.

For the text of A, which is the fullest and best, we are entirely dependent upon the Book of Fees. It enumerates firstly the fees in the body of the county which were liable for scutage to the king, secondly the fees in the liberty of the abbot of Peterborough which were not held of the abbot and were similarly liable, and thirdly the fees held of persons who had obtained writs of scutage. This last section has no descriptive title, but its nature is revealed by an examination of the Scutage Roll and the Close Roll of 1242.

The text of B as given in the Book of Fees is apparently derived from a version written at the Exchequer on the back of an original return from Wiltshire. Although manifestly incomplete, it furnishes some information which is not to be found in the existing text of A. The scribe began by copying the writ of December addressed to the sheriff of Wiltshire, thus suggesting that he regarded the list of fees in Northamptonshire as a return to a similar writ.

The text of C as given in the Book of Fees is derived from the later part of an abstract made at the Exchequer of returns from more than one county. The sequence of the names and other details show that the entries concerning Northamptonshire in this abstract were in turn based upon the document, now lost, which served as the original foundation of the B text. B and C alike credit certain fees to Neal de Mowbray, who had died in 1230, while A credits them to his brother Roger, who obtained lively of his inheritance in May 1241. [1] On the other hand, C is sometimes more correct than B.

The text of A is printed below from the only available source, the Book of Fees; that of B is printed from the earlier Exchequer manuscript; C has been used only as a check upon B.

WARWICK AND LEICESTER. For these two counties there is one list of fees in 1242, grouped according to baronies. As in the great return from Lincolnshire and elsewhere, the references to overlords must not be construed too literally. One section is headed "Feoda Radulfi de Touney," although


[1] Excerpta e Rolulis Finium, vol. i. pp. 205, 255, 338, 372; Close Rolls, 1237-1212, p. 301.

648 A.D. 1242-1243.

definite news of the death of Ralph de Toeni had reached England by January 1241. [1] So again, another section is headed " Feoda Hugonis Wack, " although Hugh Wake was dead in January 1242. [2] In this latter case, the compiler of the list was certainly cognisant of the fact, for both the places mentioned in the section are stated to be held of ' the heir ' of Hugh. Twyford and Thorpe are stated to be held " de Willelmo de Bruere," although they had been assigned in dower to his relict as far back as the year 1234. [3] On the other hand, certain fees are credited to Robert of Stafford, who did not obtain livery of his inheritance until October 1241. [4]

The list does not include the fees of the Earl of Winchester, Roger de Somery, and others who had obtained writs of scutage. There is a duplicate of it in S.ij.24, which was used at the Exchequer, where all the different sections were noted as being ' in rotulo '.

WORCESTER. For this county there is a short list of fees liable for scutage to the king as ascertained by inquisition. On the dorse of the roll there is a list of the tenants in chief who had obtained writs of scutage.

SALOP and STAFFORD. The Book of Fees contains three lists relating to the scutage of Gascony, all three copied from manuscripts which are still extant.

The first and best of them enumerates the fees in both counties, including those of the few tenants in chief who had obtained writs of scutage. On the margin of the original roll there are notes ' Breve ' or ' In rotulo,' added at the Exchequer. Internal evidence seems to show that this compilation was itself based upon inquisitions taken hundred by hundred, and it may confidently be classed with similar returns from other counties prepared in pursuance of the writs of December 1242. Eyton indeed, ascribes it to the year 1240, presumably because it mentions the barony of Walter de Lacy, who was dead in February 1241, but this estate was not divided between the coheirs until 1244. [5] There are mentions in the list of Robert of Stafford which can hardly be earlier than October 1241, when he succeeded his brother Hervey. [6] The results of the enquiry held in Shropshire at the end of 1242 or the beginning of 1243 were known to the jurors who, a century later, supplied analogous information, for the persons named by them, in 1246, as the former (quondam) tenants of particular fees prove in almost every case to be those who are named in this roll. [7]

The other two lists in the Book of Fees are copied from transcripts made at the Exchequer, at unknown dates between 1242 and 1303, from a common original now lost. Several baronies are unnoticed in either. While the points of agreement between the main list and these two shorter


[1] Close Rolls, 1237-1242, pp. 179, 206, 269, 422, 425; Excerpta e Rotulis Finium, vol. i. pp. 327, 334, 338, 344, 345; Matthew Paris, Chronica Majora, vol. iii. p. 638.
[2] Excerpta e Rotulis Finium, vol. i. p. 364.
[3] See above, p. 398.
[4] Excerpta e Rotulis Finium, vol. i. p. 357.
[5] Ibid. pp. 337, 346, 413, 445.
[6] Ibid. pp. 366, 367.
[7] Feudal Aids, vol. iv. pp. 235-247. The most important variant is the insertion of Rees ap Houwell as the former tenant of Pontesbury. He held there from 1305 to 1309. Eyton's Antiquities of Shropshire, vol. vii. p. 134.

INTRODUCTION. 649

lists are so numerous and so marked that they cannot be ascribed to accident, the points of difference are also so marked that they cannot be ascribed to mere clerical blunders. Eyton has, with much learning, shown that, in several cases of divergence in the entries concerning Shropshire, the error lies with the shorter texts, and it seems possible that they represent the sheriff's return to the writ of October 1242. The section relating to Staffordshire is obviously imperfect. A repetition in both versions of the entry concerning Ridware throws discredit upon the lost document from which they were copied.

The longer list for both counties is printed below from the original roll. Of the shorter lists one only is now printed, but the more important variants in the other, which exists in duplicate, are given in footnotes.

NOTTINGHAM and DERBY. The transcripts in the Book of Fees relating to these linked counties are more than usually confused, and the loss of most of the originals has made the classification of them somewhat difficult. The first document printed below is a short statement of the scutage levied by the sheriff from certain specified persons and by him paid into the Exchequer by the middle of October 1242. On the back of the original is a list of persona who had obtained writ of scutage and would not allow enquiry to be made as to the fees held of them. This is immediately followed by a note that the Earl of Derby, who had not obtained a writ, would not allow enquiry to be made, undertaking, however, to collect from his own tenants the money due from them to the king. It has not been considered necessary to reprint a second version of the list of persons who had paid by the middle of October 1242.

The second document printed below is a list of the fees and the tenants of overlords who appear to have obtained writs of scutage. It concludes with a list of the persons who had been deputed to summon certain recalcitrant tenants in chief, evidently furnished in pursuance of the writ of October 1242.

The Edwardian Book supplies also an elaborate list of the fees and the tenants of overlords who had obtained writs of scutage, followed by an assessment of the fees of those tenants in chief who had not obtained such writs. As the earlier part of the return is directly based upon the list compiled in October, any material variants therefrom that occur in it must be taken to have been made deliberately. This list and this assessment are alike entered over again in the Book in four detached sections, each of which presumably representa a aeparate piece of a duplicate roll now lost. The text printed below follows the consecutive version, the principal variants in the other being given within brackets or in footnotes.

Lastly, there is a list of places held otherwise than by military service, the ' nomina villarum ' prepared in pursuance of the instructiona iaaued in December 1242.

LINCOLN. The first document printed below with regard to this county is a comparatively short list of certain fees liable to pay scutage to the Crown, stating the amount charged upon each. It is immediately followed by a list of the prelates and barons who had obtained writs of scutage whereby their tenants were exempted from payment to the Crown.

In pursuance of the king'a writ of December 1242, separate inquisitions were taken in the different wapentakes of the county. Twenty-seven of

650 A.D. 1242-1243.

these inquisitions, constituting a very valuable series, are entered in the Book of Fees, while extracts from others which were missing at the time of its compilation have survived in another form, as will be shown. These inquisitions deal not only with knights' fees, but also with the demesnes of tenants in chief and lands held by serjeanty, in socage and in frank almoin.

In 1242, as in 1212, the returns from Lincolnshire were singularly elaborate, giving a great deal of information that had not been demanded by the king's writs. It would even seem that the persons responsible for them had access to historical notes of some sort, presumably supplied by the sheriff or the Exchequer. No trouble was, however, taken to secure uniformity in the rendering of personal names. Thus the lady styled Pernel de Croum in one inquisition is the Pernel de Vaus of another, and figures as ' the heir of Croum ' in a third. Instances of such variations might easily be multiplied.

It is more important to observe that the findings of some of these inquisitions with regard to overlordships must not be construed quite literally. Unless the compilers of the Book of Fees have omitted some material words which would have altered the sense of certain entries, the juries cannot have been careful to distinguish between the past and the present, between the dead and the living. The fees to which Robert of Stafford succeeded in October 1241 are credited indifferently to his brother Hervey Bagot, called also Hervey of Stafford, and to ' the heirs ' of the said Hervey. [1] So again, fees of the barony of Belvoir are credited indifferently to William de Aubigny, to ' the heir ' of William de Aubigny, and to ' the heirs ' of William of Belvoir. One of the Chancery rolls of the period shows that, in January 1242, Joan relict of Hugh Wake obtained the wardship of his son and heir, whose name is known to have been Baldwin. [2] There is therefore no difficulty in reconciling statements that particular fees were held in chief by Joan Wake, by ' the heir ' of Hugh Wake, and by Baldwin Wake. The inquisition for the wapentake of Craffoe, however, represents the deceased Hugh as the tenant at the very time when Joan Wake is entered as holding elsewhere in the same wapentake, and it is quite likely that the Baldwin mentioned was the father of Hugh. Four entries in this inquisition represent ' Earl David ' as holding directly of the king, the person thus described being the Earl of Huntingdon who had died as far back as the year 1219.

The foregoing instances are cited not in order to discredit these inquisitions, but by way of caution against a misinterpretation of them. The juries seem in many cases to have been satisfied with enumerating the places in their respective districts, naming the persons in actual possession, specifying the tenure, and assigning them to different baronies, without naming the actual owners of those baronies.

After the receipt of the inquisitions from the several wapentakes, the sheriff or his clerk prepared a general return of the knights' fees in the county. For this purpose the inquisitions were systematically examined, and the entries relating to the fees of each of the principal baronies were brought together in regular sequence, as in Domesday Book. Some of the entries were curtailed, and others concerning places not held by military service were omitted. Certain discrepancies between different inquisitions were also reconciled. Thus fees credited in one to Hugh de Nevill the forester and in another to his son, John de Nevill the forester, were enumerated under the name of the latter. Nevertheless Robert of Stafford was still ignored. Being directly founded upon


[1] Excerpta e Rotulis Finium, vol. i. p. 357.
[2] Ibid. p. 364; Matthew Paris, Chronica Majora, vol. iv. p. 174; Pipe Roll, 26 Hen. III. Nottingham and Derby.

INTRODUCTION. 651

the inquisitions, the general return of fees cannot be expected to yield fresh information with regard to places in twenty-seven of the wapentakes. Inasmuch, however, as all the original documents are missing, the transcripts of this return in the Book of Fees are useful as a check upon the rendering of proper names in the transcripts of the inquisitions. Furthermore, they mention fees in those wapentakes for which the inquisitions had been lost before the compilation of the Book of Fees.

In 1303, the list of fees in Lincolnshire, compiled from the inquisitions of 1242, was made to serve as a basis for the assessment of the Aid for the marriage of the king's daughter, Eleanor. In the new list then prepared, the fees are again arranged under baronies and in the same order. Most of the old headings arc retained without alteration, although the barons named in them had long been dead. While the new list gives the names of the persons in actual possession of lands in 1303, it gives also the names of the former (quondam) tenants, that is to say those who were in possession in 1242. The section relating to the fees of the abbot of Peterborough gives only the names of the former tenants. [1]

YORK. For this county there are two versions of a list of certain fees grouped according to baronies. Although both are in one hand and obviously based upon a common original, both are transcribed consecutively in the Book of Fees. The brevity of some of the entries suggests that the list was prepared as a return to the writ of October 1242, rather than to that of December. One version only is printed below, that which was used at the Exchequer. The other has, however, been collated, and all variants of any importance found in it are given in footnotes. The document here printed contains a list of persons who had obtained writs of scutage; their fees are not enumerated. A financial statement as to scutage not collected by the sheriff, Henry of Bath, is an addition to this document, in a different hand. The debts are entered under the names of the overlords, without mention of the persons who ought to have paid.

LANCASTER (county and honour). In connexion with the scutage of Gascony, the Book of Fees gives two versions of a series of returns, one derived from an original roll, the other derived from an abbreviated copy made on the back of a return from Kent. The text printed below is based on the former, and the transcript of it in the Book of Fees has been used for supplying some deficiencies in the original. The abbreviated version has not been reprinted, but some of its variant readings are given in footnotes, although they are open to suspicion. A third manuscript (S.ij.30) is only a copy of the abbreviated version.

An inquisition by twenty jurors touching the tenure of the manor of Hornby occurs at the end of the abbreviated version, and is accordingly printed below. Its connexion with the scutage of Gascony is, however, uncertain.

NORTHUMBERLAND. We are entirely dependent upon the Book of Fees for the text of a very elaborate document which seems to have been prepared in this county in pursuance of the writ and instructions of December 1242. Inasmuch as the earlier part of it deals with knights' fees, arranged under baronies, and the later part, almost exclusively, with lands not held by military


[1] Feudal Aids, vol. in. pp. 127-175.

652 A.D. 1242-1243.

service, the transcript may represent two original rolls, both now lost. Many of the proper names in it have been misread, and erroneous headings have been prefixed to the paragraphs relating to lands held in the scutage of John fitz Robert.

The Book of Fees contains also an abbreviated version of part of the foregoing, derived from a manuscript made at the Exchequer on the back of the original return from Kent. As it gives no fresh information whatever, it is not reprinted below.

AID OF THE PRELATES. The collection of money from the clergy seems to have been more or less distinct from the levy of scutage from the laity. When most of the prelates came to Westminster to attend a great council at the end of January 1242, they were sounded individually as to the amount which they would contribute towards the expenses of the king's expedition. [1] The abbot of Winchcombe received a letter specifically enquiring how much money he would provide before mid-Lent. [2] In the early part of February, arrangements were made for a systematic canvass of abbots and priors in the counties of Lincoln and Nottingham and in the diocese of London. [3] Many promises of money or horses were obtained within a few weeks, and various religious houses paid their contributions into the Wardrobe before the end of April. [4] Some of the more ancient foundations were liable to assessment in respect of their knights' fees. The Abbot of Hyde, who had twenty fees, on which the scutage would have amounted to sixty marks, paid fifty marks in April, obtained release from payment on five fees held in demesne, and remained accountable for forty- five marks. [5] In other words, his actual contribution was thirty-five marks beyond the amount that could have been levied on his fees.

The sheriffs of the different counties seem to have been empowered to diatrain the cattle of abbots and priors who did not pay what they had promised. Some houses were, however, exempted on account of their poverty. [6] The abbess of Wilton was allowed to apply to the repair of the shrine of St. Edith the five marks which she had promised for the king's military expedition. [7] Matthew Paris relates how the chiefs of the Cistercian Order in England refused to surrender a year's profit on wool. [8]

There is still extant a roll which records the amounts contributed by the religious houses in the different counties in 1242. It appears to have been used as a basis for a formal enrolment at the Exchequer, for the payments recorded in it are all noted as being ' in rotulo.' All the entries except three are furthermore noted as being ' in libro,' and the Book of Fees contains transcripts of all except these three. The roll, which was obviously prepared by more than one scribe and at different times, shows that some of the religious houses paid their contributions to the local sheriff, others to the Wardrobe, and others to the Treasury.


[1] Matthew Paris, Chronica Majora, vol. iv. pp. 180, 182.
[2] Close Rolls, 1237-1242, p. 431.
[3] Ibid, p. 430. Cf. Calendar of Patent Rolls, 1232-1247, pp. 272, 279, 280.
[4] Close Rolls, 1237-1242, pp. 417-421.
[5] Ibid. p. 421; Calendar of Patent Rolls, 1232-1247, p. 284; Memoranda Roll, L.T.R. no. 14, m. 124.
[6] Close Rolls, 1237-1242, pp. 412, 419.
[7] Ibid. p. 424.
[8] Chronica Majora, vol. iv. pp. 234, 235.

INTRODUCTION. 653

Although the roll purports to deal with ' prelates ' in general, it contains the name of only one bishop, William, Bishop of Norwich. In point of fact he and other bishops, and the Abbot of Westminster, had been authorised to levy on behalf of the king three marks from every fee held of them. [1] In Middlesex the fees of the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of London were reckoned among those of the lay barons. [2] We learn incidentally that the Bishop of St. Davids gave 40 marks, for which he received special thanks from the king, but, in the absence of the roll of accounts of the scutage, our knowledge as to the contributions of the prelates is very limited. [3]

DIVERS COUNTIES. Near the end of the second volume of the Book of Fees, there are two series of Exchequer notes connected with the scutage of Gascony. The first series relates to money unpaid and seems to have been extracted from the lost roll of accounts of the collectors of that scutage. The second series is a rough and imperfect compariaon between the payments made by certain peraons in 1235 and in 1242.


[1] Close Rolls, 1237-1242, pp. 487, 489, 490, 492; Memoranda Roll, L.T.R. no. 14, m. 14.
[2] See p. 897 below.
[3] Calendar of Patent Rolls, 1232-1247, p. 283.

654 A.D. 1242-1243.

KENT.

S.ij.19.II.18-32.

NOMINA EORUM QUI TENENT FEODA MILITARIA IN COMITATU KANCIE ET DE QUIBUS IPSI TENENT. [1]

Bertramus de Crioll' j. feodum in hundredo de Ringslowe, racione custodie Johannis filii Thome, de abbate Sancti Augustini.

Henricus de Sanwyco j. feodum in eodem hundredo, racione custodie Stephani filii Hugonis, de [2] abbate Sancti Augustini.

Item idem Henricus j. feodum in Dene in eodem hundredo de dicto abbate.

Item idem Henricus j. feodum in Westgate, racione custodie Roberti filii Roberti, de dicto abbate.

Item idem j. quarterium in Aseton' in eodem hundredo de dicto abbate.

Johannes de Wlton' j. quarterium in Garinwinton' de eodem abbate.

Item idem Johannes dimidium feodum in Wlton' de eodem abbate.

Simon de Greneweie, Johannes de Wingate, Johanna de Wingate, dimidium feodum de eodem abbate.

Thomas de Bernesfeld j. feodum in Elmereston' de dicto abbate.

Willelmus de Swalesclive dimidium feodum in Swalesclive de dicto abbate.

Radulfus de Hegham dimidium feodum en Ores de dicto abbate.

Huardus de Bickel' j. quarterium en Chistelet de dicto abbate.

Heredes Hugonis Sodanke dimidium feodum in Chistelet de dicto abbate.

Salomon de Hardres j. feodum in Heghardres de comite Glovernie.

Robertus de Crevequer j. feodum en Blen de comite Glovernie.

Willelmus de Cluse, Willelmus de Cestevile, dimidium feodum in Witstapell' de comite Glovernie.

Robertus de Godyeneston' et sui participes dimidium feodum in Nitherhardres de Hamone de Crevequer.

Radulfus de Hegham iij. quarteria en Hegham de Willelmo de Say.

Willelmus de Delce j. quarterium in Ebynton' de Willelmo de Say.

Walterus Truue j. quarterium in Patrickesburne de Willelmo de Say.

Prior de Bello Loco, Johannes de Say, j. feodum in Patrickesburne de Willelmo de Say.

Ricardus filius Regis j. quarterium in Kingeston' de domino rege.

Gyrardus de Tapinton' j. feodum in Tapinton' de Ricardo filio Regis et de Roysia uxore sua.


[1] This general heading should be followed by a heading:- Lestum Sancti Augustini.
[2] In this return the names of the chief lords are bracketed to the fees held of them. They have here been repeated.

KENT. 655

S.ij.19.II.28-32 - cont.

Willelmus de Coleswod' j. quarterium in Kingeston' de Ricardo filio Regis et de Roysia uxore sua.

Johannes de Cundishalle j. quarterium in Witstapell' de Waltero de Clifford'.

Willelmus de Tangrenton' dimidium feodum in Tangrenton' de Roberto de Mussingrave de feodo Albrinc'.

LESTUM DE [HAEDEL]ING. [1]

Feoda H. de Crevequer.

Willelmus de Albrinvill' j. feodum in Oxonia de Hamone de Crevequer, ipse de domino rege.

Willelmus de Scringlingis j. feodum in Scrinling' de Hamone de Crevequer, ipse de domino rege.

Radulfus de la Have, Alanus de Tilmaneston', j. feodum in eadem de Hamone de Crevequer, ipso de domino rege.

Nicholaus de Selling', heres Johannis de Sancto Leodegario, heres Rogeri de Malemayns, j. quarterium in Wodnesberg' de eodem Hamone, ipse de domino rege.

Willelmus de Aubrinvill' j. feodum in Walemer' de eodem Hamone.

Willelmus de Langedon' j. quarterium in Langedon' de Willelmo de Aubrinvill' et ipse de eodem Hamone, ipse de domino rege.

Robertus de Boyton' dimidium feodum in Langedon' de Willelmo de Aubrinvill' et ipse de eodem Hamone, ipse de domino rege.

Hamo de Soles, Johannes de Soles, j. feodum de Ricardo de Rokeslee. ipse de supradicto H. ipse de domino rege.

Eudo de Sellingeheude j. quarterium in Elvinton' de Nicholao de Sellinges, ipse de supradicto H. ipse de domino rege.

Feoda Regis.

Gilibertus Pecche j. feodum in Westclive de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Abbas Sancte Radegundis j. feodum in Poltone de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Henricus de Crammavill' j. quarterium in Soldthon' de honore Peverelli.

Feoda Willelmi de Say.

Henricus de Fugers j. feodum in Apelthone de Willelmo de Say, ipse de domino rege.

Heres Roberti de Berhamme j. quarterium in Nortpopesalle de Willelmo de Say, ipse de domino rege.

Hamo Colekyn, Rogerus de Kynardinton' j. feodum in Easole de Willelmo de Say, ipse de domino rege.

Item Henricus de Fugers j. feodum et dimidium in Walwaresare de Willelmo de Say, ipse de domino rege.


[1] The first five letters of this name have entirely disappeared. The heading was not transcribed in the Book.

656 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

Radulfus Haket j. feodum in Hamwolde de Willelmo de Say, ipse de domino rege.

Feoda Roberti Sancti Johannis.

Abbas Sancte Radegundis, Robertus de Caloys, Radulfus Talebot, j. feodum in Pisinges de Roberto de Campania, ipse de Roberto Sancti Johannis.

Johannes Tancre j. feodum in Betleeangre de eodem Roberto [1] Sancti Johannis.

Johannes de Bykenor' dimidium feodum in Pysinges de eodem Roberto [1] Sancti Johannis.

Heres Willelmi de Popesale dimidium feodum ibidem de eodem Roberto [1] Sancti Johannis.

Henricus de Sandwico, heres Radulfi filii Bernardi, j. feodum in Hamme de eodem Roberto [1] Sancti Johannis.

Feoda W. de Say.

Item Simon de Wicham dimidium feodum ibidem de Simone de Holte, ipse de Willelmo de Say.

Heres Willelmi de Swanton' dimidium feodum ibidem de Henrico de Fugers, ipse de Willelmo de Say.

Henricus de Sandwico j. feodum in Ripplee de Bartholomeo de Badelesmere, ipse de Willelmo de Say.

Radulfus de Cestreton' dimidium feodum in Cuttlescumbe de Willelmo de Say.

Symon de Holte dimidium feodum in Denenton' de Willelmo de Say.

Feoda Abbatis Sancti Augustini.

Bartholomeus de Badellesmere dimidium feodum in Beauwesfeld' de abbate Sancti Augustini.

Willelmus de Crioll' dimidium feodum in Lynacre de abbate Sancti Augustini.

Simon de Crioll' j. feodum in Soldon' de abbate Sancti Augustini.

Heres Hugonis Soldanke iij. quarteria feodi in Eastsutton' de abbate Sancti Augustini.

Thomas de Northbynne j. quarterium ibidem de herede Hugonis Soldank', et ipse de supradicto abbate.

Heres Johannis de Valoynes j. feodum in Westsutton' de herede Hamonis de Valoynes, et ipse de supradicto abbate.

Petrus de Betlesangre dimidium feodum ibidem de Waltero de Den', et ipse de supradicto abbate.

Feoda Ricardi filii Regis.

Heres Roberti de Hegham j. feodum in eadem de Ricardo filio Regis.

Ricardus de Say dimidium feodum in Lyttelhegham de Ricardo filio Regis.

Johannes de Herste j. quarterium in Siberteston' de Ricardo filio Regis.


[1] Cf. p. 678

KENT. 667

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

Henricus de Sandwico j. quarterium in Walfinge de Ricardo filio Regis.

Stephanus Manekyn j. quarterium in Makeston' de Johanne de Esling', ipse de Ricardo filio Regis.

Elya de Bothon' dimidium feodum in La Kersuner' de herede Stephani de Thomeham.

Willelmus de Hertangre j. feodum in eadera de Simone filio Ade, ipse de Roberto filio Walteri.

Radulfus Perot ij. feoda in Cnolton' et in Ringleton' et in vallo de comitissa Augy, ipsa de comite Arundelfi.

LESTUM DE SIPWEYE.

Simon de Crioll' tenet Pacamanston', et portinet ad ij. feoda in Hessettesford', de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Nicholaus de Marinis j. feodum in Otrepole de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Robertus de Scales j. quarterium in Parva Wilmynton' de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Stephanus de Wilminton' j. feodum ibidem de Willelmo de Putot, ipse de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Willelmus de Putot j. feodum in Sellinges de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Heres Thome de Normanvill' j. quarterium in Cocrido de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Magister hospitalis de Ospringes j. feodum in Trianeston', de dono domini regis, de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Willelmus de Tatenhamme xvj. partem feodi de Willelmo de Putot, ipse de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Willelmus de Hordlaweston' ij. feoda in eadem de domino rego de honore de Pertico.

Nicholaus Folet dimidium feodum in Rokinges de Bertramo de Crioll', ipse de domino rege de eodem honore.

Alvredus de Dene j. quarterium in Singledeall', racione dotis, de Johanne de Crioll', ipse de domino rege de eodem honore.

Philippus de Columbers v. quarteria in Postlinges de domino rege de eodem honore.

Heres Alulfi de Rukynges dimidium feodum ibidem de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Bertramus de Crioll', abbas de Boxelee, Ricardus de Grelleo, Johannes de Snaves, dimidium feodum in Silesbreg' de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Nicholaus de Haulo j. feodum in Strete, racione custodie Johannis Bretel, de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Nicholaus de Marines j. feodum in Blakesmaneston' de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Heres Thome de Normanvill' j. feodum in Kynardinton' et in Cocride de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Heres Radulfi de la Thun' dimidium feodum in Blakeburn' de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

658 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

Magister hospitalis de Ierusalem j. feodum in Bonynton' in libera elemosina de dono Giliberti de Cantewell'.

Stephanus de Becco viij. partem unius feodi in Herste de Willelmo de Albrinvill'.

Feoda comitis Arundelli.

Margeria filia Reginaldi de Cornhull' j. feodum in Everland' de comitissa Augi, et ipsa de comite Arundelli.

Andreas de Oxrode j. quarterium in eadem de comitissa Augi, et ipsa de comite Arundelli.

Johanna de Bynyndenn' j. feodum in eadem de comitissa Augi, et ipsa de comite Arundelli.

Orabla de Meyhamme j. feodum in eadem de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augy, et ipsa de comite Arundelli.

Eilwisia de Meyhamm dimidium feodum in eadem de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augy, et ipsa de comite Arundelli.

Rogerus de Gatindenn' j. feodum in eadem de Simone de la Haye, et ipse de Radulfo Perot, et ipse de comitissa Augy, et ipsa de comite Arundelli.

Heres Joscelini de Egerindenn' iiijtam partem unius feodi in Tanyndenn' de Eilwysia de Meyhamm', et ipsa de Orabla sorore sua primogenita, et ipsa de comite Herefordie. et ipse de comitissa Augy, et ipsa ut supra.

Thomas filius Aukeri j. quarterium in Losnehamm' de Radulfo de Sancto Leodegaro, et ipse de priore de Ledes, et ipse de Helewysia de Meyhamm', et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse ut supra.

Abbas de Ponte Roberti iiijtam partem unius feodi in Cnocke de Orabla de Meyhamm'; et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augy, et ipsa de comite Arundelli.

Item idem abbas j. quarterium in Wokelee de Orabla de Meyhamm, et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augy, et ipsa de comite Arundelli.

Item idem abbas iij. partes unius quarterii de Orabla de Meyhamm, et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augy, et ipsa de comite Arundelli.

Joscelinus Poynant ix. partes unius feodi in Rolvindenn' de Willelmo de Hethindenn', et ipse de Orabla de Meyhamme, et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse ut supra.

Willelmus de Hethindenn' iiij. partem et x. partem unius quarterii ibidem de Orabla de Meyhamme, et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse ut supra.

Heres Roberti de Merelee iiij. partem unius feodi in Stapelhurste de Helewisia de Meyham, et ipsa de Orabla de Meyhamme, et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse ut supra.

Feoda Hamonis de Crevequer.

Willelmus de Albrinvill' ij. feoda et dimidium in Swinesfeld' de Hamone de Crevequer, et ipse de domino rege.

Willelmus de Swinesfeld j. feodum in eadem de Hamone de Crevequer, et ipse de domino rege.

KENT. 659

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

Robertus de Boynton' dimidium feodum in eadem de Hamone de Crevequer, et ipse de domino rege.

Henricus de Everinges j. feodum in eadem de Hamone de Crevequer, et ipse de domino rege.

Willelmus de Flecge j. quarterium in Hauekyng' de Hamone de Crevequer, et ipse de domino rege.

Heres Rogeri le Malemayns dimidium feodum in Alkam de Hamone de Crevequer, et ipse de domino rege.

Heres Willelmi de Langham dimidium feodum in Rolvindenn' et in Oxenale de Hamone de Crevequer, et ipse de domino rege.

Thomas de Alkam dimidium feodum in Alkam de novo feofamento de supradicto Hamone, et ipse de domino rege.

Stephanus de Becke j. quarterium in Orgrave de novo feofamento de supradicto Hamone, et ipse de domino rege.

Robertus de Wendeval j. quarterium in Folkestane de novo feofamento de supradicto Hamone, et ipse de domino rege.

Philipus de Palatre iijam partem unius feodi in eadem de supradicto Hamone, et ipse de domino rege.

Walterus de Eynesbroc' j. feodum in eadem de supradicto Hamone, et ipse de domino rege.

Magister Odo de Cyrinton' ij. feoda et dimidium in eadem de supradicto Hamone, et ipse de domino rege.

Bertramus de Crioll' j. quarterium in Cumbe de supradicto Hamone, et ipse de domino rege.

Item idem Bertramus iij. quarteria in Cumbe de comite Kancie.

Thomas de Bernesfeld' et Willelmus de la Leghe viijam partem unius in Sutlegh de heredibus Rogeri Malemayns.

Salomon de Hardres iij»m partem unius feodi in Sellinges de comite Glovernie.

Feoda Abbatis Sancti Augustini.

Johannes de Snaves dimidium feodum in Snaves de abbate Sancti Augustini.

Willelmus de Sokenesse dimidium feodum in Snaves de abbate Sancti Augustini.

Feoda Willelmi de Say.

Hugo le Wyte j. feodum de Nicholao Folet, et ipse de Radulfo de Sancto Leodegaro, et ipse de Willelmo de Say, et ipse de domino rege.

Simon del Healdeall' viijam partem feodi in eadem de Willelmo de Pevinton', et ipse de Willelmo de Say, et ipse de domino rege.

Willelmus de Casingeham viijam partem unius feodi de Nicholao Folet, et ipse de Willelmo de Say, et ipse de domino rege.

Abbas de Ponte Roberti tenet Ossindenn' per liberum servicium de heredibus Willelmi de Bodenhamm'.

660 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

LESTUM DE SRAWINGHOPE.

Feoda domini Regis.

Folco Bullard' j. quarterium in Sandhurste de Philippo de Culumbers, et ipse de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Simon de Crioll' ij. partem unius feodi in Hessetesford' de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Ricardus et Thomas, filii Orable de Meyhamm' vjtam partem feodi in Sewenton' de dicto Simone, et ipse de domino rege de honore de Pertico.

Robertus de Easteture j. feodum in eadem de Simone de Crioll, et ipse de domino rege.

Helewisia de Meyhamme vjtam partem feodi in Sewinton de Simone de Crioll, et ipse de domino rege.

Willelmus de Samelesford' dimidium feodum in eadem de Roberto de Gatton', et ipse de domino rege de honore de Hagenet.

Ricardus filius Regis ij. feoda in Chilleham de domino rege de honore de Hagenet.

Radulfus de Birgholte dimidium feodum de Philippo de Culumbers, et ipse de domino rege de honore de Hagenet.

Walterus de Dene dimidium feodum in Rappton' de abbate Sancti Augustini.

Alvredus de Dene vjtam partem unius feodi de Johanne de Crioll'.

Feoda Hamonis de Crevequer.

Petrus de Hauekeswell' dimidium feodum in eadem de Hamone de Crevequer, et ipse de domino rege.

Bartholomeus de Badellesmere iij. quarteria in eadem de Hamone de Crevequer, et ipse de domino rege.

Item idem Bartholomeus dimidium feodum in Horton' de Hamone de Crevequer, et ipse de domino rege.

Ricardus Payforer j. quarterium in Bocland' de Hamone de Crevequer, et ipse de domino rege.

Ricardus de Rokesle iij. quarteria in Westwod' de Hamone de Crevequer, et ipse de domino rege.

Willelmus de Pyrie j. feodum in eadem de Nicholao de Selling', et ipse de Hamone de Crevequer, et ipse de domino rege.

Feoda Ricardi filii Regis.

Willelmus Juvenis j. feodum in Chilleham de Ricardo filio Regis.

Heres Reginaldi de Ponte Fracto xxx. partem unius feodi in Chilleham de Ricardo filio Regis.

Robertus de Chilleham dimidium feodum in eadem de Ricardo filio Regis.

Willelmus de Eastesture dimidium feodum in Chilleham de Ricardo filio Regis.

Henricus de Eastesture dimidium feodum in Chilleham de Ricardo filio Regis.

Henricus filius Regis j. feodum in Chilleham, racione custodie heredis Rogeri le Poer, et ipse de supradicto Ricardo.

KENT. 661

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

Item Galfridus Persevent j. feodum in Chilleham de Ricardo filio Regis.

Eudo de Sellingeheld' dimidium feodum in Chilleham de supradicto Ricardo.

Feoda Comitis Leycestrie.

Michael de Hestingel' iij. quarteria feodi ibidem de herede Willelmi de Turvill', et ipse de comite de Leycestria, et ipse de domino rege.

Johannes Pund dimidium feodum in Braburn' de comite de Leycestria, et ipse de domino rege.

Heres de Godwineston' j. feodum in eadem de Simone de Turvill', et ipse de comite de Leycestria, et ipse de domino rege.

Feoda Ricardi filii Regis.

Johannes Dyve j. feodum in Eslinges de Ricardo filii Regis.

Simon de Chelesfeld' j. feodum in Eslynges de Ricardo filio Regis.

Johannes de Eslynges j. feodum ibidem de Ricardo filio Regis.

Willelmus de Oteringedenn' dimidium feodum in Eslynges de Johanne de Eslynges, et ipse de supradicto Ricardo.

Johannes filius Arnoldi dimidium feodem in Eslynges de Johanne Dyve, et ipse de supradicto Ricardo.

Radulfus de Eslynges dimidium feodum in eadem de Symone de Chelesfeld, et ipse de supradicto Ricardo.

Heres de Lodenham j. feodum in eadem, et ipse de supradicto Ricardo.

Willelmus de Codesland' dimidium feodum de Johanne de Eslynges, et ipse de supradicto Ricardo.

Magister hospitalis de Ospringes xl. partem unius feodi in Everland de Nicholao de Girund'.

Feoda domini Regis.

Ricardus Payforer dimidium feodum de Galfrido de Lucy, et ipse de domino rege.

Robertus de Gatton' j. feodum in Trule de domino rege.

Johannes de Eslynges dimidium quarterium in Osprenges de domino rege.

Johannes de Crioll' ij. partes de iiijta parte unius feodi in Herteye de domino rege.

Elya de Bocton' j. feodum in eadem de honore Bolonie de domino rege.

Johannes de Crioll' ij. feoda in Welles de honore de Pertico de domino rege.

Ricardus Kanteys et Basilia relicta Rogeri Cod dimidium quarterium in Osprenges de domino rege.

Willelmus de Vyane j. quarterium in Osprenges de domino rege.

Stephanus de Beckewell' j. feodum in eadem de Thoma de la Haye, et ipse de domino rege.

662 A.D. 1242-1243.

Feoda Roberti de Sancto Johanne.

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

Robertus de Campania j. feodum in Norton' et in Newenham de Roberto de Sancto Johanne.

Item idem Robertus dimidium feodum in Herteye de Roberto de Sancto Johanne.

Willelmus de Vyane j. quarterium in Northene de eodem Roberto, et ipse de Roberto de Sancto Johanne.

Bartholomeus de Moriston' j. quarterium in Herste de Roberto de Sancto Johanne.

Mabilia de Mares j. quarterium in Ruggeston' de predicto Roberto, et ipse de Roberto de Sancto Johanne.

Thomas de Phisburn' dimidium feodum in eadem de eodem Roberto, et ipse de Roberto de Sancto Johanne.

Galfridus de Sconynton' j. quarterium in Scoland' de eodem Roberto, et ipse de Roberto de Sancto Johanne.

Feoda Willelmi de Say.

Willelmus de Aldelose dimidium feodum in eadem de Willelmo de Say.

Johanna de Apeldrefeld' viijam partem unius feodi in Oterpleye, nomine dotis, de Willelmo de Say.

Stephanus de la Haye dimidium feodum in Beaumundeston' de Willelmo de Say.

Philippus de Cumbe j. feodum in Cumbe de Bertramo de Crioll', et ipse de Alano de Estune, et ipse de Roberto filio Maudree, et ipse de Thoma de la Haye, et ipse de domino rege.

Feoda Comitis Glovernie.

Alexander Rabel j. feodum in Crumdal', et ipse de comite Glovernie.

Willelmus de Cantelo dimidium feodum in Thermworthe, racione custodie [heredis] Hamonis de Waloynes, et ipse de comite Glovernie.

Warina dimidium feodum in Crumdal' de herede Johannis de Valoynes, et ipse de herede Hamonia de Valoynes, et ipse de comite Glovernie.

Muriel de Sumery j. quarterium in Fennes, nomine dotis, de herede Warini filii Giroldi.

Bertramus de Crioll' dimidium feodum in Esmeresfeld' de herede Radulfi filii Bernardi, et ipse de abbate Sancti Augustini.

Willelmus de Wynfeld' et Jordanus de Windefeld' j. quarterium de Reginaldo de Cornhull'.

LESTUM DE EILLESFOED.

Robertus de Barmlyng' j. feodum ibidem in capite de domino rege.

Fulco Payforer dimidium feodum in Barmlyng' de comite de Claro.

KENT. 663

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

Rogerus de Kancia dimidium feodum in Barmlyng de Alicia de Watham, et ipsa de eodem comite.

Stephanus de Barmlyng' dimidium feodum ibidem de eadem Alicia, et ipsa ut supra.

Johanna de Sanford dimidium feudum in Brenchesle de [1] comite Glovernie.

Theobaldus de Chnolle dimidium feudum in Brenchesle de Alicia de Danmartin, et ipsa de comite Glovernie.

Prior de Tonebreg' j. quarterium in Estbokingfaud de Johanne Chanu, et ipse de eadem Alicia, et ipsa de comite Glovernie.

Radulfus de Pinpe j. feudum in eadem de predicta Alicia, et ipsa de comite Glovernie.

Rogerus de Snotbam dimidium feudum in Aiding' de Johanne Chanu, et ipse de dicta Alicia, et ipsa de comite Glovernie.

Willelmus de Scoford dimidium feudum in Ditton' de comite Glovernie.

Willelmus de Sitfleton' dimidium feudum in eadem de Willelmo de Ditton', et ipse de comite Glovernie.

Willelmus de Branton' j. quarterium in eadem de predicto Willelmo de Ditton', et ipse de comite Glovernie.

Nicholaa de Kenet dimidium feudum in Lamberherste, nomine dotis, de Hamone de Crevequer.

Fulco Peufurer dimidium feudum in Lollingaton' et in Jugo de Hamone de Crevequer.

Henricus de Ho j. quarterium in Bromfeld' de Hamone de Crevequer.

Henricus Pincerna xl. partem feudi in Ledes de Hamone de Crevequer.

Fulco de Sarstede dimidium feudum in Chatham de Hamone de Crevequer.

Nicholaus de Bassingburne j. quarterium in eadem de Hamone de Crevequer.

Heredes Thome Bokerel' j. quarterium in eadem de Hamone de Crevequer.

Bartholomeus de Badlesmere j. quarterium in Snodherste de Hamone de Crevequer.

Willelmus de Wahelle et Radulfus de Glanvill' terciam partem feudi de Roberto de Godhinet', et ipse de Hamone de Crevequer.

James de Bentestede j. quarterium in eadem de Hamone de Crevequer.

Ricardus de Rokesle j. quarterium in Totinton' de Hamone de Crevequer.

Willelmus de Totesham dimidium feudum in eadem de Hamone de Crevequer.


[1] In this and some of the following entries, the scribe has made use of a paragraph mark $$ instead of the preposition de, which is required by sense and grammar. De has been substituted for it in the present text.

664 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

Gilebertus de Henherste dimidium feudum in eadem de Alicia de Wauham, et ipsa de comite Glovernie.

Hugo de Bermundesheye xam partem feudi in Aiding' de comite Glovernie.

Heres Danielia de Lodeford' quartem [1] partem feudi de Johanne Chanu, et ipse de predicta Alicia, et ipsa de comite Glovernie.

Daniel de Crevequer dimidium feudum in Netlestede, nomine dotis, de Rolando de Acatede, et ipse de herede Simonia de Wahell', et ipse de comite Glovernie.

Malina de Acstede dimidium feudum in Helethe de comite Glovernie.

Comes Ricardus dimidium feudum in Herveland' racione custodie heredis Simonis de Wahell', de comite Glovernie.

Fulco de Sarstede terciam partem feudi in Merrewrthe de comite Glovernie.

Willelmus de Merwrthe ij. feuda in eadem de comite Glovernie.

Ricardus de Suaneton' dimidium feudum in eadem de Johanne de Beleauwe, de comite Glovernie.

Johannes de Say j. feudum et quintam partem feudi in Sipburne de comite Glovernie.

Willelmus de Cloville dimidium feudum in Parrocke de Warino de Montecan'.

Willelmus de Lodesdon' iij. quarteria in eadem de Warino de Montecan'.

Heres Roberti de Hucham dimidium feudum in Bocton' de Warino de Montecan'.

Johannes de Sancto Claro dimidium feudum in Eslingham de Warino de Montecan'.

Jordanus le Brun dimidium feudum in Acle de Willelmo de Clovile, et ipse de Warino de Montecan'.

Arnoldus de Mandevile quintam partem j. feudi in Aldinton' de Warino de Montecan'.

Gilebertus de Wotringeberi j. feudum et dimidium in eadem de Warino de Montecan'.

Heredes Roberti de Sancto Claro j. feudum in Meriaton' de Warino de Montecan'.

Ricardus de Rokesle dimidium feudum in Eccles de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de Warino de Montecan'.

Robertus Paseleauwe j. feudum in Gravesend' racione custodie heredis Henrici de Cramevil' de domino rege.

Warinus de Montecan' j. feudum in Lodesdon' de domino rege.

Simon Alius Ade dimidium feudum in Selves de Waltero filio Roberti, et ipse de domino rege.

Hamo de Ladun' dimidium feudum in Selves de Simone filio Ade, et ipse de Waltero filio Roberti, et ipse de domino rege.


[1] Read quartam.

KENT. 665

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

Hugo de Gosebec j. feudum in Nutstede de Ricardo de Ros, et ipse de Alexandre Arsie, de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Willelmus de Otringeden' j. feudum in eadem de domino Rogero de Leyburne, et ipse de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Amis de Selves dimidium feudum in eadem de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Rogerus de Leyburne dimidium feudum in Langele et in Buggele de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Thoma de Bresinges dimidium feudum in Langele de predicto Rogero, et ipse de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Jacobbus de Charleton' j. feudum in eadem de Rogero de Leyburne, et ipse de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Petrus de Otteham j. feudum in eadem de herede Willelmi de Ros, et ipse de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Muriel de Someri j. quarterium in Boniton' de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Heredes Willelmi filii Roberti dimidium feudum in Hecham de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Rogerus de Leyburne j. quarterium in Leyburne de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Radulfus Ruffin j. quarterium et sextain partem feudi de Rogero de Leyburne, et ipse de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Nicholaus de Ores dimidium feudum in Culingea de herede Willelmi Pincerne, et ipse de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Radulfus filius Nicholai j. feudum in Culinges, racione custodie Willelmi Pincerne, de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Johannes de Cobbeham dimidium feudum in Beckele de Johanne de Wlton', et ipse de Muriel de Someri, et ipsa de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de domino rege.

Item Robertus de Septemvannis j. feudum in Aldinton' de domino rege.

Arnoldus Biset j. feudum in Aldinton' de domino rege.

Johannes de Mares j. feudum in Whicclesmere de domino rege.

Robertus de Gatton' j. feudum in Wodnesell' et in Bothon' de domino rege.

Hugo de Creasy j. feudum in Heriettesham de domino rege de honore Peverelli.

Isolda de Gray dimidium feudum in Ho de domino rege.

Nicholaus Poins dimidium feudum in Ho de domino rege.

Arnoldus Sauvage viijam partem feudi in Stokingeberi de Willelmo de Aubrinvile, ipse de Roberto de Sancto Johanne.

Idem Willelmus j. feudum in Stokinberi de Roberto de Sancto Johanne.

Johannes de Bikenore dimidium feudum ibidem de Galfrido de Mandevill', ipse de Roberto de Sancto Johanne.

666 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

Willelmus del Port in Eilnothinton' dimidium feudum de Roberto de Sancto Johanne.

Heres Ricardi Vetule dimidium feudum in Bikenore de herede Radulfi filii Bernardi, et ipse de Roberto de Sancto Johanne.

Ricardus de Berhestede dimidium feudum ibidem de Willelmo de Port, et ipse de Roberto de Sancto Johanne.

Feuda Willelmi de Say.

Reginaldus de Cobbeham vam partem feudi in Thomeham de Alicia de Bendinges, et ipsa de Willelmo de Say, et ipse de domino rege.

Johannes de Watham vam partem feudi in Thomeham de herede Radulfi filii Bernardi, et ipse de Willelmo de Say, et ipse de domino rege.

Matheus de Heynton' dimidium feudum in Thomeham de Roberto de Manekeay, et ipse de Willelmo de Say, et ipse de domino rege.

Heres Willelmi de Capella dimidium feudum in Thomeham de Hugone de Plais, et ipse de Willelmo de Say, et ipse de domino rege.

Willelmus de Pevinton' j. feudum in Farburne de Willelmo de Say, et ipse de domino rege.

Radulfus de Padleswrth' j. quarterium ibidem de Willelmo de Say, et ipse de domino rege.

Ricardus de Hencheberge x. partem ibidem de Willelmo de Say, et ipse de domino rege.

Orable de Meyhamm', Eilwysia soror eius, iij. quarteria feudi in Herbertinton' de comitissa Augi de honore Hagenet.

Fulco Peiufurer j. quarterium in Frenestede de eadem Orabla, et ipsa de comitissa Augi de honore Hagenet.

Adam de Rifford' xl. partem feudi in Herdecrune de hospitali de Osprenges; Heres Roberti de Merelee dimidium feudum ibidem de Rogero [1] de Cressy; et ipsi de domino rege de honore Peverelli.

Galfridus Martel dimidium feudum in Sutton' de Simone de Monteforti, ipse de W. Marescallo.

Henricus Malemeins j. feudum in Ho de Willelmo de Angervil.

Theodorius de Stokes dimidium feudum in Ho de episcopo Roffe, et ipse de domino rege.

Heredes Symonis de Berhersse j. quarterium ibidem de episcopo Roffe, et ipse de domino rege.

Warinus de Montecaniso dimidium feodum in Wicham de episcopo Roffe, et ipse de domino rege.

Johannes de Sancto Claro dimidium feudum in Eslingham de eodem Warino, et ipse de episcopo Roffe, et ipse de domino rege.

Rogerus de Bavent, Petrus de Talamo, Willelmus de Langereche, Thomas le Chevaler, iij. quarteria in Haulig' de eodem episcopo.


[1] Rogero is written over an erasure.

KENT. 667

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

Thoma de Sancto Claro j. quarterium in Eslingham de Johanne de Sancto Claro, et ipse de supradicto episcopo.

Simon de Cray dimidium feudum in Brumhay de herede Willelmi le Boteller, et ipse de supradicto episcopo.

Robertus Biset j. quarterium feudi in Parva Wldeham de supradicto episcopo.

Johannes de Criol j. quarterium in Parva Wldeham de supradicto episcopo.

Heres Roberti le Neve in eadem Wldeham j. quarterium de supradicto episcopo.

Walterus le Boteler de Meauling dimidium feudum in Ewell' de supradicto episcopo.

Philippus de Povenesse, Johannes le Vel, Robertus Hareng, Walterus le Ladd', dimidium feudum in Snodiland de eodem episcopo.

Ricardus Gromin, Johannes filius Willelmi, prior de Strodes, heres Simonis de Cockesford', dimidium feudum in Strodes de Simone de Chelesfeld'.

Alanus de Godinton' dimidium feudum in Strodes de Galfrido Scoland'.

Johannes de Burgo tenet Estchalke de baronia Auwesie uxoris sue.

Jodlanus de Nevile j. feudum in Some de domino rege.

Episcopus Roffe j. quarterium in Cuckelstan' de domino rege.

Cancellarius Sancti Pauli dimidium feudum in Nessinden' de domino rege.

Nicholaus de Gerunde j. feudum in Wernnestede de domino rego.

Gilebertus de Wrotingeberi j. quarterium ibidem de Simone filio Ade.

Petrus filius Roberti xx. partem feudi in Wrotingebery.

Willelmus de Cloville j. feudum [in] Srainbrocke de Rogero de Leyburne.

Heres Thome Bukerel' ij. feoda et dimidium in Magna Delce de Bertramo de Crioll', et ipse de Willelmo Ebor', et ipse de magistro Odone de Cyrinton', et ipse de domino rege.

Johannes filius Willelmi de Delce j. feodum in Parva Delce de Willelmo de Say. Breve.

LESTUM DE SUTTON'.

Robertus de Camvill' ij. feoda in Westerham de domino rege de honore Bolonie.

Johannes de Mares j. feodum in Acmere et in Sentling' de domino rege.

668 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

Mabilia Torpel j. quarterium in Esse de Rogero de Munbray, et ipse de domino rege.

Willelmus de Faukeham j. quarterium in Hesse de Mabilia Torpel, et ipsa de Rogero de Mumbray, et ipse de rege.

Odo de Cyrinton' j. feodum in Mapelcamps' de Ricardo de Ros, et ipse de heredibus Roberti Arsik, et ipsi de rege.

Ymbertus Pugeis dimidium feodum in Kinkesdon' de domino rege.

Alicia de Ros iij. quarteria jus feodi in Freningeham, nomine dotis, de Ricardo de Ros, et ipse de heredibus Roberti Arsik', et ipse de domino rege.

Henricus Malemaynis dimidium feodum in Begenham de domino rege.

Willelmus de Abervill' j. feodum in Litelhou de domino rege.

Walterus de Stokes j. quarterium j. feodi in Bradested' de comite Glovernie.

Ricardus Duket j. feodum in Elteham de comite Glovernie.

Willelmus de Henlee dimidium feodum in Elteham de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de comite Glovernie.

Item heres Willelmi de Ros j. feodum in Lulfingeston' de supradicta Margeria.

Henricus de Apeldrefeld' j. feodum in Codeham de Willelmo de Say.

Willelmus Pessun dimidium feodum in Kestane de Willelmo de Say.

Willelmus de Stanes iij. feoda in Wicham nomine dotis de Radulfo filio Nicholai, et ipse de Margeria de Ripariis.

Symon de Craye ij. feoda in eadem de supradicto Radulfo, et ipse de Margeria de Ripariis.

Alanus de Godinton' j. feodum in Chelesfeld' de Galfrido de Scoland, et ipse de Simone de Munford.

Willelmus Pykot dimidium feodum in Chelesfeld' de Alano de Godinton', et ipse de dicto Galfrido, et ipse de Simone de Munford.

Johannes Flemeng' j. feodum in Farnberg' de Simone de Chelesfeld, et ipse de supradicto Simone de Mumford.

Bertramus de Criel j. quarterium in Kaldecote de supradicto Simone, et ipse de dicto Simone de Mumford.

Ricardus de Rokeslee j. feodum ibidem de Hamone de Crevequer.

Robertus de Crevequer dimidium feodum in Votescraye de Hamone de Crevequer.

Thomas de la Warderob' dimidium feodum in Votescraye de Hamone de Crevequer.

Fulco Peyforer dimidium feodum in Lulfingeston' de Hamone de Crevequer.

KENT. 669

S.ij.19.II.18-32 - cont.

Simon de Echingeham dimidium feodum in Lulfingeaton de Ricardo de Rokesle, et ipse de Hamone de Crevequer.

Thomas Eswy dimidium feodum in Litelbroke de Willelmo de Butayll', et ipse de episcopo Roffensi.

Johannes de Litlebroke j. quarterium ibidem de episcopo Roffensi.

Sarra de Pole ij. partem j. feodi in Suhtflet nomine dotis de episcopo Roffensi.

Willelmus de Taukeham j. feodum et dimidium ibidem de episcopo Roffensi.

Heres Costentini Juvenis j. feodum in Derteford' de Amaldo de Mandevill' de Warino de Munkanensi.

Heres Gralandi de Sancto Leodegaro dimidium feodum in Swaneschamps' de Warino de Munkanensi.

Heres Michaelis de Stifford' xam partem j. feodi in Swanescamp' de Warino de Munkanensi.

Gilebertus de Marisco tenet Wolewich', sed nesciunt pro quanto de Warino de Munkanensi.

Matheus de Hegham xx. partem unius feodi in Home racione dotis de Arnoldo de Mandevill', et ipse de supradicto Warino.

Simon capellanus domini regis et Alexander de Easthall j. quarterium in Bromleg', unde Wymundus de Brumlee habet xxiiij. partem, de episcopo Roffensi.

Heres Johannis de Braybrok' vj. partem j. feodi in Brumlee de episcopo Roffensi.

Ricardus Alius Galfridi viij. partem j. feodi in Bromlee de episcopo Roffensi.

Radulfus Munfichet x. partem j. feodi in Lesnes de Ricardo filio Regie.

Item heres Johannis filii Roberti et heres Thome del Gardin j. quarterium in Derteford' de supradicto episcopo.

Simon de Chelesfeld' j. feodum et vj. partem feodi, nomine dotis, de Simone de Mumford' de honore de Neweber'.

Galfridus de Scoland' j. feodum et dimidium feodum et j. quarterium et vtam partem feodi in Hortone de Simone de Mumford' de honore de Neweber'.

Thomas de Suthhesse ij. partes feodi ibidem de Simone de Mumford' de honore de Neweber'.

Thomas de Paucompe xij. partem feodi in Esse de herede Willelmi de Eynesford, et ipse de herede Radulfi filii Bernardi, et ipse de Mabilia de Torpel, et ipsa de Rogero de Munbray.

Willelmus de Butailles ij. partes de dimidio feodo in Kinkeadon' de herede Radulfi filii Bernardi, et ipse de rege.

670 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij..19.18-32 - cont.

Alanus clericus iij. partem de dimidio feodo in Kingesdon' de Alexandre del Easthall', et ipse de Jacobo de Hevre, et ipse de herede Radulfi filii Bernardi, et ipse de domino rege.

Willelmus de Mumbray et Willelmus de Chepstad' xx. partem feodi in Kingesdon' de herede Radulfi filii Bernardi, et ipse de domino rege.

Walterus de Ros j. quarterium in Freningeham de Alicia de Ros, et ipsa de herede Roberti Arsick'.

S.ij.19.II.1-17.

NOMINA EORUM QUI TENENT FEODA MILITARIA IN COMITATU KANCIE ET DE QUIBUS IPSI TENENT.

Feoda abbatis Sancti Augustini Cantuarie.

Vicecomes propria manu. In rotulo prelatorum. [1]

Bertramus de Crioll' j. feodum in Teneto, racione custodie Johannis filii Thome.

Henricus de Sandwico j. feodum in Teneto, racione custodie Stephani filii Hugonis.

Item idem Henricus j. feodum in Westgate, racione custodie Roberti filii Roberti.

Item idem Henricus j. quarterium in Asetun'.

Johannes de Wlton' j. quarterium in Garewynton'.

Item idem Johannes dimidium feodum in Wolton'.

Simon de Greneweye et participes aui dimidium feodum in [2].

Thomas de Bernefeld' j. feodum in Eylmereston'.

Willelmus de Swalesclive dimidium feodum in eadem.

Radulfus de Hegham dimidium feodum in Ores.

Huardus de Bichel' j. quarterium in Chistelet.

Bartholomeus de Badellesmer' dimidium feodum in Beauwesfeld'.

Willelmus de Crioll' dimidium feodum in Lynacre.

Simon de Crioll' j. feodum in Schoweldon'.

Heres Hugonis Soldank' iij. quarteria in Eastsutton'.

Thomas de Nortbynne j. quarterium de herede Hugonis Soldank', et ipse de eodem abbate.

Heres Johannis de Valoynes j. feodum in Westsutton' de herede Hamonis de Valoynes, et ipse de eodem abbate.

Petrus de Betleshangre dimidium feodum in eadem de Waltero de Dene, et ipse de eodem abbate.

Johannes de Snaves dimidium feodum in eadem.

Willelmus de Sokenesse dimidium feodum in Snaves.

Bertramus de Crioll' dimidium feodum in Esmeresfeld' de herede Radulfi filii Bernardi, et ipse de eodem abbate.


[1] These marginal notes apply to all the fees of the abbot.
[2] No place is specified in the original return used by the compiler of this list.

KENT. 671

S.ij.19.II.1-17 - cont.

Walterus de Dene dimidium feodum in Rappton', et ipse de eodem abbate. [1]

Heres Hugonis Soldank' dimidium feodum in Chistelet.

Feoda [2] Comitis Glovernie, que [3] Comes Ricardus tenuit in dotem. [4]

Salemon de Hardres j. feodum in Heghardres de comite Ricardo, quia de dote comitisse Glovernie. Breve.

Robertus de Crevequer j. feodum in Blen [5]. De eodem. In rotulo. Breve.

Willelmus de Cluse, Willelmus de Cestuill' dimidium feodum in Wytatapell'. [6] De eodem. In rotulo. Breve.

Salemon de Hardres iij. partem feodi in Selling'. [6] De eodem. In rotulo. Breve.

Nicholaus de Hadlo [7] j. feodum in Crundale. De eodem. Comes Ricardus. In rotulo. Breve.

Willelmus de Cantelo dimidium feodum in Thremworth ratione custodie heredis Hamonia de Valoynes, et ipse de eodem comite. In rotulo. Breve.

Warina dimidium feodum in Crumdal' de herede Johannis de Valoynes et ipse de herede Hamonis de Valoynes, et ipse de eodem comite. In rotulo. Breve.

Fulco Payforer dimidium feodum in Barmling'. In rotulo. T.

Rogerus de Kancia dimidium feodum de Alicia de Watham, et ipsa de eodem comite. In rotulo. T.

Stephanus de Barmling' dimidium feodum in eadem de predicta Alicia, et ipsa de eodem comite. In rotulo. T.

Johanna de Samford' dimidium feodum in Brenchesl'. In rotulo. T.

Teobaldus de Cnoll' dimidium feodum in Brenchesl' de predicta Alicia. [8] In rotulo. T.

Prior de Tonebrege j. quarterium in Eastbokingefaud' de Johanne Chanu et ipse de predicta Alicia, et ipsa de eodem comite. In rotulo. T.


[1] These five words appear to be redundant.
[2] The marginal notes to these fees are confused. In the text here given the notes are repeated where their repetition is indicated by brackets in the original. But the confusion is so great that the position of the notes is often doubtful.
[3] The words que . . . dotem are an addition.
[4] After dotem, II.2 adds de dote Isatelle comitisse Gloucestrie uxoris sue.
[5] To this entry was appended a note per eundem, which seems to have been erased.
[6] To this entry was appended a note idem, which seems to have been erased.
[7] Nicholaus de Hadlo is written over an erasure. The original return has Alexander Rabel.
[8] The original return printed above reads Alicia de Danmartin.

672 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19.II.1-17 - cont.

Radulfus de Pympe j. feodum in eadem de predicta Alicia, et ipsa de eodem comite. In rotulo. T.

Rogerus de Snotbyam dimidium feodum in Aiding' de Johanne Chanu, et ipse de predicta Alicia et ipsa de eodem comite. In rotulo. T.

Willelmus de Sofford' dimidium feodum in Ditton', quia de dote. Comes Ricardus. In rotulo. Breve.

Willelmus de Sifflatun' dimidium feodum in eadem de eodem Willelmo et ipse de eodem comite. Comes Ricardus. In rotulo. Breve.

Willelmus de Branton' j. quarterium in Branton' de eodem Willelmo, et ipse de eodem comite. Comes Ricardus. In rotulo. Breve.

Gilibertus de Henhurste dimidium feodum in eadem de Alicia de Watham, et ipsa de eodem comite. In rotulo. T.

Hugo de Bermundesay x. partem feodi in Aiding' de eodem comite. In rotulo. T.

Heres Danielle de Lodenesford' iiijtam partem feodi de Johanne Chanu, et ipse de predicta Alicia, et ipsa de eodem comite. In rotulo. T.

Malyna de Acstede dimidium feodum in Helgthe, quia de dote. Comes Ricardus. Breve.

Daniel' de Crevequer dimidium feodum in Nettelsted nomine dotis de Rolando de Acstede, et ipse de herede Simonia de Wahulle, et ipse de predicto comite. Comes Ricardus. Breve.

Comes Ricardus dimidium feodum in Everland' ratione custodie heredis Simonia de Wahull' et ipse de eodem comite. De dote. Comes Ricardus. Breve.

Folco de Sarchestede iijain partem in feodi Merewrth'. Comes. Ricardus. Breve.

Willelmus de Merewrth ij. feoda ibidem. Comes Ricardus. Breve.

Ricardus de Swanton' dimidium feodum ibidem de Johanne de Bella Aqua et ipse de eodem comite. De dote. Comes Ricardus. Breve.

Johannes de Say j. feodum et vtam partem feodi in Syburn'. Senescallus Ricardi de Clar' non permittit ballivum. In rotulo. Totum.

Walterus de Stokes j. quarterium feodi in Bradestede. Sic in rotulo.

Ricardus Duket j. feodum in Elteham, quia de dote. Comes Ricardus. Sic in rotulo. Comes Ricardus. Breve.

Willelmus de Hanlee dimidium feodum in Elteham de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de eodem comite quia de dote. Comes Ricardus. Breve.

Feoda Hamonia de Crevequer. Breve.

Robertus de Godyneston' et sui participes dimidium feodum in Nitherhardres.

Willelmus de Albrevill' j. feodum in Oxeneia.

Willelmus de Scringling' j. feodum in Scrinfing'.

KENT. 673

S.ij.19.II.1-17 - cont.

Radulfus de la Haye, Alanus de Tilmaneston' j. feodum in eadem.

Nicholaus de Selling', heres Johannis de Sancto Leodegaro, heres Rogeri Malemayns, j. quarterium in Wodnesberg.

Willelmus de Albrevill' j. feodum in Walemer'.

Willelmus de Langedon' j. quarterium in Langedon' de Willelmo de Albrinvill', et ipse de predicto Hamone.

Robertus de Boyton' dimidium feodum in Langedon' de Willelmo de Albrinvill', et ipse de predicto Hamone.

Hamo de Soles, Johannes de Soles, j. feodum de Ricardo de Rokesle, et ipse de predicto Hamone.

Eudo de Sellingeheld' j. quarterium in Elvinton' de Nicholao de Selling', et ipse de predicto Hamone.

Willelmus de Albrinvill' ij. feoda et dimidium in Swinesfeld'.

Willelmus de Swinesfeld' j. feodum in Swinesfeld'.

Robertus de Boyton' dimidium feodum in Boyton'.

Henricus de Evering' j. feodum in Evering'.

Willelmus de Flecge j. quarterium in Haueking'.

Heres Rogeri Malemayns dimidium feodum in Alcham.

Heres Willelmi de Langham dimidium feodum in Rolvindenn' et in Noxnale.

Thomas de Alcham dimidium feodum in Alcham.

Stephanus del Beck' j. quarterium in Orgrave.

Robertus de Wendevall' j. quarterium in Folkestane.

Philipus de Palstre iijam partem feodi in eadem.

Walterus de Eynesbroc' j. feodum in eadem.

Odo de Syrinton' ij. feoda et dimidium in Cyrinton'.

Bertramus de Crioll' j. quarterium in Cumbe.

Petrus de Hauekesuell' dimidium feodum in eadem.

Bartholomeus de Badellesmere dimidium feodum in Horton'.

Ricardus Payforer j. quarterium in Bocland'.

Item Bartholomeus de Badellesmere iija quarteria in eadem.

Ricardus de Rokesle iija quarteria in Westwode.

Willelmus de Perie j. feodum in eadem de Nicholao de Selling', et ipse de predicto Hamone.

Nicholas Kynet dimidium feodum in Lamberhurste, nomine dotis.

Folco Payforer dimidium feodum in Lullyngcston' et in Jugo.

Henricus de Ho j. quarterium in Brumfeld'.

Henricus Pincerna xl. partem feodi in Ledes.

Fulco de Sarcstede dimidium feodum in Chetham.

Nicholaus de Bassingeburn' j. quarterium in Chetham.

Heres Thome Bukerel j. quarterium in Chetham.

Bartholomeus de Badellesmere j. quarterium in Snodhurste.

Willelmus de Wahull', Radulfus de Glanvill', iijam partem feodi de Roberto de Godyneston', et ipse de predicto Hamone.

Johannes [1] de Bentestede j. quarterium in Bentestede.

Ricardus de Rokeslee j. quarterium in Totinton'.

Willelmus de Tutesham dimidium feodum in eadem.

Ricardus de Rokesle j. feodum in eadem.


[1] The original return printed above reads James.

674 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19.II.1-17 - cont.

Robertus de Crevequer dimidium feodum in Votescray.

Thomas de la Warderobe dimidium feodum in Votescray.

Fulco Payforer dimidium feodum in Lulfingeston'.

Symon de Hecingeham dimidium feodum in Lulfingeston' de Ricardo de Rokeslee, et ipse de predicto Hamone.

Willelmus de Tangrinton' dimidium feodum ibidem de Roberto de Mussingraf, et ipse de eodem Hamone de honore Albrine'.

Feoda Willelmi de Say. Breve.

Radulfus de Hegham iij. quarteria in Hegham.

Willelmus de Delce j. quarterium in Ebynton'.

Walterus Truue j. quarterium in Patrichesburn'.

Prior de Bello Loco, Johannes de Say, j. feodum in Patrichesburn'.

Henricus de Fugers j. feodum in Apelton'.

Heres Roberti de Berhamm' j. quarterium in Nortpopeall'.

Hamo Colekyn, Rogerus de Kynardinton', j. feodum in Easole.

Item Henricus de Fugera j. feodum et dimidium in Walwarsare.

Radulfus Haket j. feodum in Hammewold'.

Simon de Wicham dimidium feodum in Wicham de Simone de Holte, et ipse de predicto Willelmo.

Heres Willelmi de Swaneston' dimidium feodum in eadem de Henrico de Fugers, et ipse de predicto Willelmo.

Henricus de Sandwico j. feodum in Ripple de Bartholomeo de Badellesmere, et ipse de predicto Willelmo.

Radulfus de Cestreton' dimidium feodum in Cutkellescumbe.

Simon de Holte dimidium feodum in Denenton'.

Elya de Boton' dimidium feodum in Kersunere de heredibus Stephani de Thorneham, et ipsi de predicto Willelmo.

Hugo le Wyte j. feodum de Nicholao Folet, et ipse de Radulfo de Sancto Leodegaro, et ipse de predicto Willelmo.

Simon de Ealdehall' viijvam partem feodi in eadem de Willelmo de Pevinton', et ipse de predicto Willelmo.

Willelmus de Casingeham iiijtam partem feodi de Nicholao Folet, et ipse de predicto Willelmo.

Willelmus de Aldelose dimidium feodum in Aldelose.

Johanna de Apeldrefeld' viijvam partem in Oterpley nomine dotis.

Reginaldus de Cobbeham vtam partem feodi in Thomeham de Alicia de Bending', et ipsa de predicto Willelmo.

Johannes de Watham vtam partem feodi in Thomeham de herede Radulfi filii Bernardi, et ipse de predicto Willelmo.

Matheus de Heynton' dimidium feodum in Thomeham de Roberto de Manekesi, et ipse de predicto Willelmo.

Heredes Willelmi de Capell' dimidium feodum in Thomeham de Hugone de Plays, et ipse de predicto Willelmo.

Willelmus de Pevinton' j. feodum in Farnburn' de predicte Willelmo.

Radulfus de Padleswrth' j. quarterium ibidem de predicto Willelmo.

Ricardus de Hencheberg' x. partem feodi ibidem de predicto Willelmo.

KENT. 675

S.ij.19.II.1-17 - cont.

Henricus de Apeldrefeld' j. feodum in Codeham de predicto Willelmo.

Willelmus Pessun dimidium feodum in Kestane de predicto Willelmo.

Stephanus de la Haye dimidium feodum in Beaumundeston' de predicto Willelmo.

Johannes filius Johannis de Delce j. feodum in Parva Delce de predicto Willelmo.

Feoda Ricardi filii Regis et Roysie uxoris sue. Breve.

Ricardus filius Regis j. quarterium in Kyngeston' in dominico de domino rege.

Gerardus de Tapinton' j. feodum in Tapinton'.

Willelmus de Coleswode j. quarterium in Kyngeston'.

Heres Roberti de Hegham j. feodum in eadem.

Ricardus de Say dimidium feodum in Liftelhugham.

Johannes de Herste j. quarterium in Syberteston'.

Stephanus Manekin j. quarterium in Maxton' de Johanne de Eslinges, et ipse ...

Henricus de Sandwico j. quarterium in Walling'.

Willelmus Juvenis j. feodum in Chilleham.

Galfridus Persevent j. feodum in Chilleham.

Eudo de Sellingehuld dimidium feodum in Chilleham.

Heres Reginaldi de Ponte Fracto xxx. partem feodi in Chilleham.

Robertus de Chilleham dimidium feodum in eadem.

Willelmus de Estesture dimidium feodum in Chilleham.

Henricus filius Regis j. feodum in Chilleham racione custodie heredis Rogeri le Poer, et ipse de eodem Ricardo.

Johannes Dyve j. feodum in Esling'.

Simon de Chelesfeld' j. feodum in Esling'.

Johannes de Esling' j. feodum in Esling'.

Willelmus de Oteringeden' dimidium feodum in Esling' de Johanne de Esling', et ipse de predicto Ricardo.

Johannes filius Arnoldi dimidium feodum in Esling' de Johanne Dive et ipse de predicto Ricardo.

Radulfus de Esling' dimidium feodum in Esling' de Simone de Chelesfeld', et ipse de predicto Ricardo.

Heres de Lodenham j. feodum in Lodenham de predicto Ricardo.

Willelmus de Codesland' dimidium feodum de Johanne de Esling', et ipse de predicto Ricardo.

Radulfus Munfichet x. partem feodi in Lesnes.

Ricardus filius Regis ij. feoda in Chilleham in dominico.

Feoda [1] domini regis tam de honore Pevcrclli quam de honore de Hagenet.

Henricus [2] de Cramavill' j. quarterium in Soldon' de honore Peverelli. In rotulo. Totum.


[1] The marginal notes under these fees are confused. In the text here given the notes are repeated where their repetition is indicated by brackets in the original. But the confusion is so great that the position of the notes is often doubtful.
[2] The word heredes is interlined above Henricus.

676 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19.II.1-17 - cont.

Hugo de Cressi j. feodum in Heriottesham de honore Peverelli. Breve.

Heres Roberti de Merele dimidium feodum ibidem de Hugone de Cressi. Breve.

Gilbertus Pecche j. feodum in Westelive de honore de Pertico. In rotulo. Totum.

Abbas Sancte Radegundis j. feodum in Polton' de honore de Pertico. In rotulo. Totum.

Simon de Crioll' ij. feoda in Hessettesford' et in Pacamanston' de honore de Pertico. In rotulo.

Nicholas de Marines j. feodus in Otrepole de honore de Pertico. In rotulo. Totum.

Robertus de Scales j. quarterium in Parva Wilminton' de honore de Pertico. In rotulo. Totum.

Stephanus de Wilminton' j. feodum in eadem de Willelmo de Putot, et ipse de eodem honore. Pert'. In rotulo. Totum.

Willelmus de Putot j. feodum in Selling' de eodem honore. Pert'. In rotulo. Totum.

Heres [1] Thome de Normanvill' ... de eodem honore. Pert'. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Tatenham xvj. partem feodi de Willelmo de Putot, et ipse de eodem honore. Pert'. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Hordlaweston' ij. feoda in eadem de eodem honore. Pert'. In rotulo. Totum.

Nicholaus Folet dimidium feodum in Rokinges de Bertramo de Crioll', et ipse de eodem honore. Pert'. In rotulo. [2]

Alvredus de Dene j. quarterium in Singledehall', racione dotis, de Johanne de Crioll', et ipse de eodem honore. Pert'. In rotulo. [2]

Nicholaus de Haulo j. feodum in Strete, racione custodie Johannis Bretel, de eodem honore. Pert'. In rotulo. [2]

Philipus de Culumbers v. quarteria in Postling' de eodem honore. Pert'. In rotulo. Totum.

Heres Alulfi de Rukinges dimidium feodum in Rokinges de eodem honore. Pert'. In rotulo. Totum.

Nicholaus de Marines j. feodum in Blakcmanston' de eodem honore. Pert'. In rotulo. Totum.

Bertramus de Crioll', abbas de Boxel', Ricardus Grelle, Johannes de Snaves, dimidium feodum in Silesbreg' de eodem honore. In rotulo.

Heres Thome de Normanvill' j. feodum in Kynardinton' et in Cocride de eodem honore. In rotulo.

Heres Radulfi de la Thune dimidium feodum in Blakeburn' de eodem honore. In rotulo.

Fulco [3] Ballard j. quarterium in Sandhurste de Philippo de Columbers, et ipse [3] de eodem honore. In rotulo.


[1] This entry has been erased.
[2] The word Breve placed against each of these three entries seems to han been afterwards erased.
[3] This entry has been erased.

KENT. 677

S.ij.19.II.1-17 - cont.

Simon de Crioll' ijas partem [1] feodi in Hesettesford' de eodem honore. In rotulo.

Ricardus, Thomas, filii Arable de Meyhamm' vjtam partem feodi in Sewenton' de predicto Simone, et ipse de eodem honore. In rotulo.

Robertus de Estesture j. feodum in eadem de Simone de Crioll', et ipse de eodem honore. In rotulo.

Helewisia de Meyhamm' vjtam partem feodi in Sewenton' de Simone de Crioll', et ipse de eodem honore. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Shamelesford' dimidium feodum ibidem de Roberto de Gatton', et ipse de honore Hagenet. In rotulo. T.

Radulfus de Bircholt dimidium feodum de Philippo de Columbers, et ipse de honore Hagenet. In rotulo.

Robertus Paaselawe j. feodum in Graveahend', racione custodie heredia Henrici de Crammavill'. In rotulo.

Ricardus Payforer j. quarterium [2] de Galfrido de Lucy, et ipse de domino rege in [3] Bocland'. In rotulo. T.

Robertus de Gatton' j. feodum in Treuleg'. In rotulo. T.

Johannes de Ealinges dimidium quarterium in Osprenges. In rotulo. T.

Johannes de Crioll' ij. partes de iiijl a parte feodi in Herteye. In rotulo.

Elya de Bocton' j. feodum in eadem de honore Bollonie. In rotulo.' T.

Ricardus Kanteys, Basilia relicta Rogeri Coci, dimidium quarterium in Osprenges. In rotulo. T.

Stephanus de Bechewell' j. feodum in eadem de Thoma de la Hay, et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo. T.

Willelmus de Vyane j. quarterium in Osprenges. In rotulo. T.

Philipus de Cumbe j. feodum in Cumbe de Bertramo de Crioll', et ipse de Alano de Estune, et ipse de Roberto filio Maudre, et ipse de Thoma de la Haye, et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo.

Robertus de Barmlinges j. feodum in Barmlinges. In rotulo.

Simon filius Ade dimidium feodum in Selves de Waltero filio Roberti, et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo. T.

Hamo de la Dune dimidium feodum in Selves de dicto Simone, et ipse de predicto Waltero, et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo. T.

Robertus de Septem Vannis j. feodum in Aldinton'. In rotulo. T.

Arnoldus Byset j. feodum in Aldinton'. In rotulo. T.

Johannes de Mares j. feodum in Wicclesmer'. Breve.

Robertus de Gatton' j. feodum in Wodnessell' et in Boton'. In rotulo. T.

Isolda de Gray dimidium feodum in Ho. In rotulo. T.

Nicholaus Poyna dimidium feodum in Ho. In rotulo. T.

Jodlanus de Nevill' j. feodum in Snorne. In rotulo. T.


[1] The scribe wrote ij. partem; the ij was afterwards corrected to ijam, and partem left unaltered.
[2] The words j. quarterium have been erased.
[3] In Bocland added by the scribe.

678 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19.II.1-17 - cont.

Cancellarius Sancti Pauli dimidium feodum in Nessinden'. In rotulo. T.

Nicholaus de Girunde j. feodum in Wrennested'. In rotulo. T.

Heres Thome Bukerel' ij. feoda et dimidium in Magna Delce de Bertramo de Crioll', et ipse de Willelmo Ebor', et ipse de Magistro Odone de Cirinton', et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo.

Johannes de Crioll' ij. feoda in Welles de honore de Pertico. De Pertico. In rotulo.

Robertus de Camvill' ij. feoda in Westerham de honore Bollonic. In rotulo. T.

Johannes de Mares j. feodum in Acmere et in Sentlinges. Breve.

Mabilia Torpel j. quarterium in Esse de Rogero de Mumbray, et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo. T.

Willelmus de Faukenham j. quarterium in Esse de predicta Mabilia, et ipsa de predicto Rogero, et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo.

Imbertus Pugeis dimidium feodum in Kingesdon'. In rotulo. T.

Henricus Malemayns j. feodum in Hou. [1] In rotulo.

Willelmus de Albrinvill' j. feodum in Littel Ho. Breve.

Alicia de Ros iij. quarteria feodi in Freningeham, nomine dotis, de Ricardo de Ros, et ipse de herede Roberti Arsik', et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo. T.

Willelmus de Butailles ij. partes de dimidio feodo in Kyngesdon' de herede Radulfi filii Bernardi, et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo.

Alanus clericus iijam partem de dimidio feodo in Kingesdon' de Alexandre de Easthall', et ipse de Jacobo de Hevre, et ipse de herede Radulfi filii Bernardi, et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Mumbray, Willelmus de Chepstede, xx. partem feodi in Kingesdon' de herede predicti Radulfi, et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo.

Magister Odo de Cyrinton' j. feodum in Mapelescamps' de Ricardo de Ros, et ipse de herede Roberti Arsik, et ipse de domino rege.

Adam de Rifford xl. partem feodi in Edecrune de hospitali de Osprenges. In rotulo. T.

Thomas de Peaucompe x. partem feodi in Hesse de herede Willelmi de Eynesford', et ipse de herede Radulfi filii Bernardi, et ipse de Mabilia Torpel, et ipsa de Rogero de Munbray, et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo.

Feoda Roberti de Sancto Johanne. [2] Breve.

Johannes Tancre j. feodum in Betleshangre.

Abbas Sancte Radegundis, Robertus de Caloys, Radulfus Talebot, j. feodum in Pysinges de Roberto de Campania, et ipse de Roberto Sancti Johannis.

Johannes de Bikenore dimidium feodum in Pisinges de Roberto de Campania, et ipse de Roberto Sancti Johannis.

Heres Willelmi de Popeshale dimidium feodum ibidem de Roberto de Campania, et ipse de Roberto Sancti Johannis.


[1] Added after an erasure.
[2] There is an incorrect version of part of this section in II.866.

KENT. 679

S.ij.19.II.1-17 - cont.

Henricus de Sandwico, heres Radulfi filii Bernardi, j. feodum in Hamm' de Roberto de Campania, et ipse de Roberto Sancti Johannis.

Robertus de Campania j. feodum in Norton' et in Newenham.

Item idem Robertus dimidium feodum in Herteye de predicto Roberto, et ipse [1] de Roberto Sancti Johannis.

Mabilia de Mares j. quarterium in Ruggeston' de predicto Roberto, et ipse de Roberto Sancti Johannis.

Thomas de Phisburn' dimidium feodum ibidem de predicto Roberto, et ipse de Roberto Sancti Johannis.

Willelmus de Vyane j. quarterium in Northene de predicto Roberto, et ipse de Roberto Sancti Johannis.

Galfridus de Sconynton' j. quarterium in Scoland' de predicto Roberto, et ipse de Roberto Sancti Johannis.

Bartholomeus de Moriston' j. quarterium in Herste.

Arnoldus Sauvage viijam partem feodi in Stokingeberi de Willelmo de Albrinvill', et ipse. [2]

Item idem Willelmus j. feodum in Stokingeberi.

Johannes de Bikenore dimidium feodum ibidem de Galfrido de Mandevill', et ipse de Roberto Sancti Johannis.

Willelmus de Port dimidium feodum in Eilnothinton' de Roberto Sancti Johannis.

Heres Ricardi Vetule dimidium feodum in Bikenore de herede Radulfi filii Bernardi, et ipse de Roberto Sancti Johannis.

Ricardus de Bergested' dimidium feodum ibidem de Willelmo de Port, et ipse de Roberto Sancti Johannis.

Feoda Warini de Montecanet'. Breve.

Willelmus de Clovill' dimidium feodum in Parock'.

Willelmus de Lodesdon' iij. quarteria feodi ibidem.

Heres Roberti de Hugham dimidium feodum in Boton'.

Johannes de Sancto Claro dimidium feodum in Eslingeham.

Jordanus le Brun dimidium feodum in Accle de Willelmo de Clovill', et ipse de predicto Warino.

Gilbertus de Woteringeberi j. feodum et dimidium.

Heres Roberti de Sancto Claro j. feodum in Merston.

Ricardus de Rokeslee dimidium feodum in Eccles de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de predicto Warino.

Arnoldus de Mandevill' v. quarteria in Adinton'.

Heres Costentini Juvenis j. feodum in Derteford' de predicto Arnoldo, et ipse. [3]

Heres Gralandi de Sancto Leodegaro dimidium feodum in Swanescamps'.

Heres Michaelis de Stifford' x. partem feodi in Suanescamps'.

Gilibertus de Marisco tenet in Wlwich' dimidium [4] feodum.


[1] Delete de predicto Roberto et ipse.
[2] Supply de Roberto Sancti Johannis.
[3] Supply de predicto Warino.
[4] dimidium feodum written over an erasure.

680 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19.II.1-17 - cont.

Mattheus de Hegham xx. partem feodi in Home, racione dotis de Arnoldo de Mandevill', et ipse de predicto Warino.

Warinus de Montecanet' j. feodum in Lodesdon' in dominico de domino rege.

Item idem Warinus dimidium feodum in Wicham in dominico de episcopo Roffensi.

Johannes de Sancto Claro dimidium feodum in Eslingeham de predicto Warino, et ipse de episcopo Roffensi.

Feoda Comitis de Leycestria. Breve.

Michael de Hestingle iij. quarteria feodi ibidem de herede Willelmi de Turvill','et ipse de predicto comite.

Johannes Pund dimidium feodum in Bradeburn'.

Heres de Godwineston' j. feodum ibidem de Simone de Turvill', et ipse de predicto comite.

Alanus de Godinton j. feodum in Chelesfeld' de Galfrido de Escoland, et ipse de predicto comite.

Willelmus Pykot dimidium feodum in Chelesfeld' de Alano de Godinton, et ipse de predicto Gaffrido, et ipse de predicto comite.

Johannes le Fleminge j. feodum in Famberge de Simone de Chelesfeld', et ipse de predicto comite.

Bertramus de Crioll' j. quarterium in Kaldecote de predicto Simone, et ipse de predicto comite.

Galfridus Martel dimidium feodum in Sutton' de predicto comite.

Ricardus Gronin, Johannes filius Willelmi, dimidium feodum in Strodes de Simone de Chelesfeld', et ipse de Gaffrido Scoland', et ipse de comite Leycestrie.

Alanus de Godinton' dimidium feodum in Strodea de Galfrido Scoland', et ipse de comite,

Feoda Comitis Arundell'. Breve.

Margeria filia Reginaldi de Cornhull' j. feodum in Overland' de comitissa Augi, et ipsa de predicto comite.

Andreas de Oxrode j. quarterium in Oxorode de comitissa Augi, et ipsa de predicto comite.

Johanna de Bynindenn' j. feodum in eadem de comitissa Augi, et ipsa de predicto comite.

Rogerus de Gatinden' j. feodum ibidem de Simone de la Haye, et ipse de Radulfo Perot, et ipse de predicti comitissa, et ipsa de predicto comite.

Arable de Meyhamm' j. feodum ibidem de comite Herefordie, et ipse de predicta comitissa, et ipsa de predicto comite.

Helewis' de Meyhamm' dimidium feodum in eadem de comite Herefordie, et ipse de predicta comitissa, et ipsa de predicto comite.

Heres Joscelini de Egerindenn' iiijtam partem feodi in Tanindenn' de predicta Helewis', et ipsa de Arable sorore sua primogenita, et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augi, et ipsa de comite Arundell'.

KENT. 681

S.ij.19.II.1-17 - cont.

Thomas filius Aucheri j. quarterium in Losneham de Radulfo de Sancto Leodegaro, et ipse de priore de Ledes, et ipse de Helewis' de Meyhamm' et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augi, et ipsa de comite Arundell'.

Abbas de Ponte Roberti iiijtam partem feodi in Cnocke de Arable de Meyhamm', et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augi, et ipsa de comite Arundell'.

Item idem abbas iijes partes quartem de Arable de Meyhamm', et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augi, et ipsa de comite Arundell'.

Item idem abbas j. quarterium in Wockel' de Arable de Meyhamm', et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augi, et ipsa de comite Arundell'.

Joscelinus Poynant ix. partes quartem in Rolvindenn' de Willelmo de Hethindenn', et ipse de Arable de Meyhamm', et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augi.

Willelmus de Hethindenn' iiijtam partem et x. partem quartem ibidem de Arable de Meyhamm', et ipse de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augi.

Heres Roberti de Merel' iiijtam partem feodi in Stapelhurste de Helewis' de Meyhamm', et ipsa de Arable de Meyhamm', et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augi, et ipsa de comite Arundell'.

Arable de Meyhamm', Helewis' soror eius, iij. quarteria feodi in Herbertinton' de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augi, et ipsa de comite Arundelli.

Fulco Payforer j. quarterium in Frednestede de predicta Arable, et ipsa de comite Herefordie, et ipse de comitissa Augi, et ipsa ut supra.

Radulfus Perot ij. feoda in Cnolton' et Ringleton' de comitissa Augy, et ipsa ut supra.

Feoda Margerie de Ripariis.

T. Willelmus de Oteringeden' j. feodum ibidem de Rogero de Leyburn', et ipse de predicta Margeria.

T. Amisius de Selves dimidium feodum ibidem de predicta Margeria.

T. Rogerus de Leyburn' dimidium feodum in Langele et in Boggele de predicta Margeria.

T. Thomas de Bressinges dimidium feodum in Langele de predicto Rogero, et ipse de predicta Margeria.

Jacobus de Cherleton' j. feodum in eadem de predicto Rogero, et ipse de predicta Margeria.

T. Petrus de Hotteham j. feodum ibidem de herede Willelmi de Ros, et ipse de predicta Margeria.

T. Muriel' de Somery j. quarterium in Boyton' de predicta Margeria.

T. Heres Willelmi filii Roberti dimidium feodum in Hegham de predicta Margeria.

682 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19.II.1-17 - cont.

Rogerus de Leyburn' j. quarterium in Leyburn' de predicta Margeria.

T. Radulfus Ruffin j. quarterium et vjtam partem feodi in Leyburn' de predicto Rogero, et ipse de predicta Margeria.

Nicholaus de Ores dimidium feodum in Culinges de herede Willelmi Pincerne, et ipse de predicta Margeria.

Radulfus filius Nicholai j. feodum in Culinges racione custodie heredis Willelmi Pincerne, et ipse de predicta Margeria.

T. Johannes de Cobbeham dimidium feodum in Beckel' de Johanne de Wlton', et ipse et [1] de Muriel' de Sumery, et ipsa de predicta Margeria.

T. Heres Willelmi de Ros j. feodum in Lulfingeston'.

Willelmus de Stanes iij. feoda in Wicham de Radulfo filio Nicholai, et ipse de predicta Margeria.

Symon de Cray ij. feoda in eadem de Radulfo filio Nicholai, et ipse de predicta Margeria.

Willelmus de Clovill' j. feodum in Srawingbroc' de Rogero de Leyburn', et ipse de predicta Margeria.

Ricardus [2] de la Rokele j. feodum in Begham de rege.

Feoda Episcopi Roffe. Solvit propria manu.

Teodorius de Stokes dimidium feodum in Ho.

Heres Simonis de Berhersse j. quarterium ibidem.

Rogerus Bavant, Petrus de Talamo, Willelmus de Langrich, Thomas le Chevaler, iija quarteria in Allingis.

Thomas de Sancto Claro j. quarterium in Eslingeham de Johanne de Sancto Claro, et ipse de predicto episcopo.

Simon de Cray dimidium feodum in Bromhay de herede Willelmi Pincerne, et ipse de predicto episcopo.

Robertus Biset j. quarterium feodi in Parva Wldeham.

Heres Roberti le Neve j. quarterium in eadem Wldeham.

Walterus Pincerna de Malling' dimidium feodum in Ewelle.

Philippus de Povenesse, Johannes le Vel, Robertus Harang, Walterus le Ladde dimidium [3] feodum in Snodland.

Thomas de Sancto Claro dimidium feodum in Eslingeham de Johanne de Sancto Claro, et ipse de predicto episcopo.

Thomas Essewy dimidium feodum in Littelbroc de Willelmo de Butaill', et ipse de predicto episcopo.

Johannes de Littelbroc j. quarterium ibidem.

Sarra de Pole ij. partem feodi in Sutflete nomine dotis.

Willelmus de Faukenham ij. feoda et dimidium ibidem.

Simon capellanus domini regis, Alexander del Esthall', Wymer de Brumle, j. quarterium ibidem.

Heres Johannis de Braybroc vjt am partem feodi in Brumlee.


[1] Dele et.
[2] There is a marginal note to this entry, possibly quia de rege. The entry is partly cancelled.
[3] The words dimidium . . . Snodland are written over an erasure.

KENT. 683

S.ij.19.II.1-17 - cont.

Ricardus filius Galfridi viijam partem feodi in Brumlee.

Heres Johannis filii Roberti, heres Thome de Gardino j. quarterium.

T. Johannes de Cundisalle j. quarterium in Wytstapell' de Waltero de Clifford'.

T. Willelmus de Herthangre j. feodum ibidem de Simone filio Ade, et ipse de Roberto filio Walteri.

T. Bertramus de Crioll' iij. quarteria feodi in Cumbe de comite Kancie.

T. Thomas de Bernesfeld', Willelmus de la Leghe, viij. partem feodi in Sutleghe de heredibus Rogeri Malemeyns, et ipse de Hamone de Crevequer.

T. Abbas de Ponte Roberti tenet Ossindene per liberum servicium de feodo Willelmi de Bodenham.

Alvredus de Dene vjtam partem feodi de Johanne de Crioll'.

T. Magister hospitalis de Osprenges xl. partem feodi in Everland' de Nicholao de Girunde.

Muriel de Sumery j. quarterium in Founes nomine dotis de herede Geroldi filii Warini. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Windfeld' et Jordanus de Windfeld' j. quarterium de Reginaldo de Cornhull'. In rotulo.

T. Hugo de Gosebeck j. feodum in Nutstede de Ricardo de Ros, et ipse de Alexandra Arsik'. In rotulo.

Ricardus [1] de la Palesle j. feodum ... Willelmo de ...

Ricardus [1] Gromyn, Johannes filius Willelmi, prior de Strodes, heres Simonis de Cokesford', dimidium feodum in Strodes de Simone de Chelesfeld', et ipse de Galfrido Scotland', et ipse de comite Leicestrie. Breve.

Alanus [2] de Godinton' dimidium feodum in Strodes de Galfrido de Scoland, et ipse de comite Leycestrie. Breve.

Gilibertus de Woteringberi j. quarterium in Woteringberi de Simone filio Ade. In rotulo.

Petrus filius Roberti xx. partem feodi in Woteringberi de Simone filio Ade. In rotulo.

Walterus de Ros j. quarterium in Freningeham de Alicia de Ros, et ipsa de herede Roberti Arsik'. In rotulo.

Magister hospitalis Jerusal' j. feodum in Bonynton' in Uberam elemosinam de dono Giliberti de Cantewell'. In rotulo.

Stephanus de Becco viijam partem feodi in Herste de Willelmo de Albrunvill'. Breve.

S.ij.19. Schedule. II.3.

Item. Heredes Hamonis de Blen tenent feodum unius militis de comite Ricardo in Cancia. Sanctus Augustinus.

Thomas de Holeford' dimidium feodum.


[1] This entry is erased.
[2] These entries are cancelled quia alibi inter feoda comitis Leycestrie.

684 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19. Schedule. II.3 - cont.

Adam Rabel tenet unum feodum. Supra.

Philippus de Hardres j. feodum.

Willelmus de Soford iiijor feoda.

Willelmus de Merewrth' ij. feoda.

Heres Simonis de Wahull' j. feodum et dimidium.

Fulco de Seystud' terciam partem fodi.

Radulfus de Suaninton' dimidium feodum.

Ricardus Duccet j. feodum.

Robertus de Sewanz j. feodum.

Rogerus Malemeins quartem partem feodi.

Feoda que comes Ricardus habuit in Kancia de dote Isabelle comitisse Gloucestrie uxoris sue.

SURREY.

S.ij.19. m.6. II.57-60. S.ij.19. m.5. II.53-56.

HEC SUNT FEODA MILITUM IN COMITATU SURR'.

De Honore de Clare.

Alicia [1] de Danmartin [2] tenet v. feoda militum et dimidium de eodem honore, scilicet in Boclond' j. feodum, in Chepsted' j. feodum, in Tenreg' j. feodum, in Ockele j. feodum, in Effingeham j. feodum, in Mikelham dimidium feodum. [3]

Hugo de Vivone [4] j. feodum et dimidium in Wudemeresthom de eodem honore. Breve [5] de respectu.

Comes [1] Saresburie j. feodum in Scaudeford' de eodem honore.

David [1] de Jarpenvill' j. feodum [6] in Aldebir' de eodem honore.

Petrus [1] de Pirefriit [7] dimidium feodum in Pirefriit [7] de eodem honore.

Radulfus [1] de Cameis j. feodum in Wudeton' de eodem honore.

Johannes [1] de Cheleburg' dimidium feodum in Leddred de eodem honore.

Robertus [1] de Mikelham j. [8] feodum in Mikelham de eodem honore.

Comitissa [1] Warennie quartem partem feodi unius militis in Herewoldesleg' de eodem honore.

Johannes [1] Extraneus et parconarii sui feodum unius militis in Waleton', nomine custodie de eodem honore.

Johannes [9] de Gateaden' unum feodum militis in Stokes de eodem honore.


[1] To this entry B. adds the note T.
[2] B. reads Dammartin. Other slight differences in the spelling of the two texts are not noticed.
[3] B. adds de honore de Clare.
[4] B. has the word tenet throughout, except as noted.
[5] B. omits this note, but has nichil.
[6] B. reads feodum militis from this point.
[7] B. reads Pirifricht.
[8] B. reads dimidium.
[9] To this entry B. adds the note P.

SURREY. 685

S.ij.19. m.6. II.57-60. S.ij.19. m.5. II.53-56 - cont.

Idem[1] Johannes j. feodum in Fecham de eodem honore cum custodia Johannis de Abernon'.

Galfridus de Grace dimidium feodum in Waleton' de eodem honore.

Hamo [1] filius Philippi dimidium feodum in Waldingeham de [2] eodem honore cum herede J. de Wauton'.

Johannes [1] de Wanton' dimidium [3] feodum in Becheswurth' de eodem honore.

Johannes de Planaz dimidium feodum in Ditton' et Talewurth de eodem honore.

Hugo de Cumbes dimidium feodum in Cumbes de eodem honore.

Willelmus [1] de Wattevill' v. feoda et [4] dimidium de eodem honore, scilicet ...

In rotulo.

De Honore Glovernie.

Gilbertus [1] de Basevill' tenet j. feodum militis in Werplesdon' de eodem honore. In rotulo. [5]

Thurstanus [1] le Despenser j. feodum in Burham de eodem honore. In rotulo.

Hugo [1] de Dool [4] dimidium feodum in Losleye de eodem honore. In rotulo.

Johannes [1] de Wykes terciam partem feodi unius militis in Wykes de eodem honore. In rotulo.

Gilbertus [1] de Hole terciam partem feodi unius militis in Werplesdon' de eodem honore. In rotulo.

Johannes [1] de Tichesye ij. feoda militum in Tichesye de eodem honore. In rotulo.

Henricus [1] de Dilewisse [7] et parconarii sui ij. feoda militum in Kamerwell' de eodem honore. In rotulo.

Hamon [8] de Valeines ij. feoda militum in Tichesye de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Cantilupo habet wardam. Breve.

De Honore [9] Willelmi de Windlesor'.

Hugo [1] de Poisted' tenet dimidium feodum militis in Cumpton' de eodem honore.

Johannes [1] de Gatesden' dimidium feodum in Cumpton' de eodem honore.

Gregorius [1] de la Dune dimidium feodum in Cumpton' de eodem honore.


[1] To this entry B. adds the note T.
[2] B. reads cum custodia Johannis de Wauton' de eodem honore.
[3] Before dimidium B. adds tenuit.
[4] B. omits et dimidium and lower scilicet.
[5] B. omits the note In rotulo throughout.
[6] B. reads Dol.
[7] B. reads Dilewyhs.
[8] B. reads Willelmus de Cantelupo tenet ij. feoda militum in Tycheseye que fuerunt Hamonis de Valeynes de eodem honore. Breve.
[9] B. reads baronia for honore throughout this section.

686 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19. m.6. II.57-60. S.ij.19. m.5. II.53-56 - cont.

Thomas [1] de Hertemere j. feodum in Hertemere de eodem honore.

Willelmus [1] Branche j. feodum in Piperinges de eodem honore.

Hugo [1] de Windlesor' j. feodum in Horsleg' de eodem honore.

Willelmus [2] de Chattele dimidium feodum in Berewe [3] de eodem honore.

In rotulo.

Isti tenent de domino Rege in capite in comitatu Surr'.

Robertus [1] de Gatton' tenet unum feodum militis in Gatton' de honore Peverel. In rotulo. [4]

Fulko [1] Basset dimidium feodum in Wocking' de domino rege in capite. In rotulo. [4]

Heredes [1] Stephani de Turnham dimidium feodum in Hertedon' de domino rege in capite. In rotulo. [4]

Rogerus [5] de Clere j. feodum et dimidium in Bromleg' de [6] domino rege in capite. In rotulo. [4]

Philippa [7] de Fay j. feodum et dimidium in Bromleg' de [8] domino rege in capite. In rotulo. [4]

Episcopus [5] Exoniensis quartem partem feodi unius militis in Horsleg' de [6] domino rege in capite. In rotulo. [4] Breve. Respondet [8] in rotulo prelatorum.

Rodlandus [5] de Axsted' iij. feoda militum in Axstede de honore Bolonie. Breve.

Isti [9] tenent de Huberto de Burgo, Comite Kancie, de Honore de Munbray in comitatu Surr'.

Willelmus [1] Hansard tenet ij. feoda militum in Taddewurth' de [10] eodem honore. In rotulo. [4]

Johannes' de Burcs unum feodum in Bergh' de eodem honore. In rotulo. [4]

De [11] Honore Warenn', quem Petrus de Sabaudia tenet in custodia.

Rogerus de Clere tenet j. feodum et dimidium in Shyre de honore Warenn'.

Johannes de Gatesden' j. feodum in Fecham de eodem honore cum Johanne de Abernun.


[1] To this entry B. adds the note T.
[2] To this entry B. adds the note P.
[3] B. reads Berewe et Chattele.
[4] B. omits the note In rotulo.
[5] To this entry B. adds the note Breve.
[6] B reads de eodem.
[7] To this entry B. adds the note Nichil.
[8] B. omits Respondet ... prelatorum.
[9] B. omits this heading.
[10] B. reads de comite Kancie de honore de Munbray.
[11] The heading in B. runs; Isti tenent de honore Warenn', quem dominus Petrus de Sabaudia habet in custodia, scilicet.

SURREY. 687

S.ij.19. m.6. II.57-60. S.ij.19. m.5. II.53-56 - cont.

Hospitale de Reygate quartam partem feodi unius militis in Reygate de eodem honore.

Rogerus de Lond' dimidium feodum in Reygate de eodem honore.

Breve.

Isti [1] tenent de Abbate de Certes' in comitatu Surr'.

Heredes Ricardi de [2] Gravenel tenent j. feodum militis in Toting' de eodem abbate.

Galfridus de Lucy dimidium feodum in Biflet de eodem. [3]

Ricardus Russel quartam partem unius militis in Trotteswurth de eodem.

Robertus de Watevill' quartam partem feodi unius militis in Assere [4] de eodem.

Petrus de Pirifriit [5] quartam partem feodi unius militis in Chepstede de eodem.

Robertus de Watevill' quartam partem feodi unius militis in Cullsdon' de eodem.

In rotulo. [6]

Isti tenent de [7] Rogero de Sumeri de Honore de Dudeleg'.

Simon le Frankeleyn tenet j. feodum militis in Middelton' de eodem Rogero.

Alexander de Wyeford j. feodum militis in Micham de eodem [8].

Galfridus de Jarpenvill' j. feodum militis in Abbingewurth' de eodem. [8]

Heres Willelmi de Brause j. feodum militis in Patindene de eodem. [8]

Breve.

Isti [9] tenent de H. de Boun, Comite Herfordie.

Willelmus de Fednes tenet unum feodum militis et dimidium in Kersalton' de [10] eodem comite.

Idem Willelmus tenet dimidium feodum unius militis in Clopham de eodem. [11] Breve.

Heredes Ricardi de Vabadun tenent ij. feoda militum in Hachesham et Camerwell' de Willelmo de Say. Breve.

Ricardus de Hameledon' tenet feodum unius militis in Hameledon' de honore Saresberie. Breve.


[1] B. omits in comitatu Surr' and marks all the fees Breve.
[2] B. omits de.
[3] B. reads de eodem abbate throughout.
[4] B. reads Eshere.
[5] B. reads Pirifryht.
[6] B. omits the note In rotulo throughout.
[7] B. reads de baronia Rogeri.
[8] B. reads de eodem Rogero.
[9] B. omits this heading and marks both fees with Breve.
[10] B. reads de H. Boun comite Herford'.
[11] B. reads de eodem comite.

688 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19. m.6. II.57-60. S.ij.19. m.5. II.53-56 - cont.

Robertus de la Dune tenet terciam partem feodi unius militis in Wendleswurth de abbate de Westmonasterio. Respondet [1] in rotulo prelatorum. Breve.

Robertus de Manekeseye tenet dimidium feodum militis in Lingefeld de abbate de Hyda. Breve. Respondet [1] in rotulo prelatorum.

Robertus de Wimbeldon' tenet terciam partem feodi unius militis in Wimbeldon' de archiepiscopo Cantuariensi. Non [2] respondet hie archiepiscopus.

Isti tenent de Honore de Mandevill' quem H. de Boun, Comes Herfordie, nunc tenet. [3]

Ingeram de Fendnes tenet dimidium feodum militis in Clopham de eodem honore.

Idem tenet dimidium feodum militis in Kersalton' de eodem honore.

Johannes de Gatesden, custos heredis Willelmi de Colevill', tenet j. feodum militis in Kersalton' de eodem. Breve.

SUSSEX.

S.ij.19. m.6. II.61-65. S.ij.19. m.4. II.66-70.

HEC SUNT FEODA MILITUM IN COMITATU SUSSEX ANNO [4] ETC. XXVI.

Isti tenent de Comite Arundell' de Honore Arundell'.

Willelmus de Percy tenet xxj. feoda et dimidium in Pettewurth de eodem honore.

Walterus de Dunstanvill' tenet v. feoda militum in Bergham de eodem honore.

Matheus Hosee iij. feoda militum in Herting' de eodem honore.

Robertus de Sancto Johanne [5] xij. feoda militum in Halnak' de eodem honore.

Walterus de Lymesy j. feodum militis in Strethamton' de eodem honore.

Johannes Extraneus j. feodum militis in Drayton' de eodem honore.

Willelmus Aguilun iij. feoda militum in Nutburn' et Merdon' de eodem honore.

Savaricus de Boun iij. feoda militum in Midherst et Fordes de eodem honore.

Hugo le Bigot vj. feoda militum in Garinges de eodem honore.

Ranulfus del Brok dimidium feodum militis in Angemere de eodem honore.


[1] B. omits Respondet in rotulo prelatorum.
[2] B. reads Archiepiscopus respondet.
[3] B. omits this heading and the three entries which follow.
[4] B. omits the date. Small diversities between the texts are not noted.
[5] B. has the verb tenet throughout in each entry.

SUSSEX. 689

S.ij.19. m.6. II.61-65. S.ij.19. m.4. II.66-70 - cont.

Magister Alexander Secularis ij. feoda militum in Triffeld et Cudelawe de eodem honore.

Robertus de Girros j. feodum in Stokes de eodem honore.

Philippus de Croft j. quarterium feodi militis in Belesham de eodem honore.

Henricus de Preston' j. quarterium feodi militis in Belesham de eodem honore.

Robertus de Bello Campo j. feodum militis in Erdinton' de eodem honore.

Ricardus Luvel j. feodum et dimidium in Storgeton' de eodem honore.

Alanus la Zuche j. feodum militis in Nudburn' de eodem honore.

Johannes de Gatesden ij. feoda militum in Pulleberg' de eodem honore.

Johannes de Nevill' iij. feoda militum in Warnekomp [1] et Sudstok de eodem honore.

Petrus de Hotot j. feodum militis in Limenistre [2] de eodem honore.

Breve.

Isti [3] tenent de Brembre qui est in manu Comitis Ricardi cum herede de Brause.

Johannes le Cunte tenet iiij. feoda militum in Morle, Suwyk et Wudemanekote de eodem honore. [4]

Robertus de Buscy iiij. feoda militum in Kyngeston' de eodem honore.

Hugo de Cumbe iiij. feoda militum in Eclesham [5] et Alpesburne de eodem honore.

Ranulfus del Brok ij. feoda in Lanzinges, Aleburn' et Bungeton' de eodem honore.

Johannes de Gatesden ij. feoda militum in Lazinges cum herede Maurici Malemeins de eodem honore.

Andreas Peverel iiij. feoda militum in Sumptinges et Yuehurst de eodem honore.

Robertus le Sauvage iiij. feoda militum in Brawater, Sehgwyk et Garingel' de eodem honore.

Stephanus le Poer iiij. feoda militum de eodem Roberto in Techam et Cleyton' de eodem honore.

Robertus le Faukener j. feodum in Heen, [6] Michelgrave et Wudeton' de eodem honore.

Radulfus de Sancto Audoeno ij. feoda militum in Clopham de eodem honore.


[1] B. reads Warnescamp.
[2] B. reads Lileministre.
[3] B. reads Isti tenent de baronia de Brembre que est in manu R. comitis Cornubie et Pictavie, scilicet:- [4] B. reads eadem baronia throughout.
[5] B. reads Elkesham.
[6] B. reads Hen.

690 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19. m.6. II.61-65. S.ij.19. m.4. II.66-70 - cont.

Willelmus le Covert [1] ij. feoda militum in Sengelton' [2] et Bradebreg' de eodem honore.

Ricardus le Large ij. feoda in Grensted et Ho de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Wystenton' iiij. feoda militum in Wisteneston' et Chilling' de eodem honore.

Willelmus Hansard j. feodum apud Bocham in comitatu Surr' de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Cleye terciam partem feodi unius militis in Cleye de eodem honore.

Radulfus de Chauton' ij. partes feodi unius militis in Changeton' de eodem honore.

Robertus Bonet [3] j. feodum et dimidium in Woppingethorn' de eodem honore.

Breve.

Isti [4] tenent de Episcopo Exoniensi de capellaria de Boseham.

Ricardus de Grensted' tenet ij. feoda militum in Thorneye de eodem episcopo.

Nicholaus de Wancy ij. feoda in Wullavinton' de eodem episcopo.

Philippus de Croft ij. feoda militum in Elnestede de eodem episcopo.

Radulfus de la Faleyse j. feodum militis in Stok' de eodem episcopo.

Ricardus de Preston' dimidium feodum in Preston' de eodem episcopo.

Respondet [5] inde in rotulo prelatorum de eodem auxilio. Breve.

Isti tenent de honore Warenn', qui est in manu domini Petri de Sabaudia, scilicet:-

Willelmus de Say tenet xiiij. feoda militum in Hammes de eodem honore.

Johannes de Burgo x. feoda militum in Porteslade de eodem honore.

Thomas de Poning' x. feoda in Poninges de eodem honore.

Simon de Petra ponte x. feoda militum in Herst de eodem honore.

Hugo de Playz vij. feoda in Iford' et Werpesburn'.

Johannes de Gatesden' iij. feoda militum in Berecomp de eodem honore.

Petrus de Kenet ij. feoda militum in Twynem de eodem honore.

Cardo de Hangelton' [6] et Radulfus de Meyners iij. feoda militum in Hangelton de eodem honore.

Willelmus Aguillun j. feodum in Pereinges de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Buscy j. feodum militis in ...

Hugo de Fokinton' j. feodum in Bevenden' de eodem honore.

Abbas de Sipeton [7] j. feodum in Rottingden de eodem honore.


[1] B. reads Cuvert.
[2] B. reads Sillington.
[3] B. reads Bonat.
[4] In B. this fee comes at the end of Sussex.
[5] B. omits this note.
[6] B. reads Angelton.
[7] B. reads Sybenton'.

SUSSEX. 691

S.ij.19. m.6. II.61-65. S.ij.19. m.4. II.66-70 - cont.

Robertus de Cukefeld j. feodum in Hangelton' de eodem honore.

Paganus de Mara dimidium feodum militis in Sandes de eodem honore.

Warinus de Kingeston' dimidium feodum militis in Kingeston' de eodem honore.

Johannes de Gatesden' dimidium feodum militis in Dicheling' de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Munceus dimidium feodumin Herst de eodem honore.

Nicholaus de Nugun dimidium feodum ...

Ricardus de Wyavill' [1] terciam partem unius feodi in Blechinton' de eodem honore.

Breve.

Petrus [2] de Sabaudia tenet Honorem de Aquila de domino rege in capite per ij. feoda et [3] militum et dimidium.

Isti tenent de eodem honore, scilicet:-

Heredes Johannis de Monte Acuto [4] tenent xv. feoda militum de eodem [5] honore, unde duo sunt in comitatu Norhamton'.

Heredes Gwydonis de Sakevill' vj. feoda militum in Chavinton' de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Engelfeld' iij. feoda militum cum heredibus Walrami Maufe in Chiuinton' [6] de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Exsete [7] iij. feoda militum in Exete [7] de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Echingham ij. feoda in Pikenden' de eodem honore.

Henricus de Hertefeld iiij. feoda militum in Hertefeld de eodem honore.

Willelmus Davy [8] ij. feoda militum in Horstede de eodem honore.

Walterus de Alfricheston' dimidium feodum militis in Alfricheston' de eodem honore.

Breve.

Alicia [9] Comitissa Augi tenet Honorem de Hasting' de domino rege in capite. Isti tenent de ea:-

Willelmus de Sancto Leodegaro tenet v. feoda militum et dimidium de eadem comitissa.

Willelmus de Echingham vij. feoda militum in Echingham de eadem.

Walterus de Scoteny [10] xiiij. feoda militum et dimidium de eadem.


[1] B. reads Wayvile.
[2] This heading in B. runs: Pevenes'. Isti tenent de baronia de Aquila que est in manu P. de Sabaudia.
[3] Delete et.
[4] B. reads Muntagu.
[5] B. reads de eadem baronia throughout this fee.
[6] B. reads Echinton', that is Eckington in Ripe.
[7] B. reads Esshetes.
[8] B. reads David.
[9] This heading in B. runs: Hastinges. Isti tenent de honore de Hastinges quem comitissa de Augo tenet de rege.
[10] B. reads Escoteny.

692 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19. m.6. II.61-65. S.ij.19. m.4. II.66-70 - cont.

Willelmus de Sancto Leodegaro de Farleye iij. feoda et dimidium de eodem.

Willelmus de Welles iiij. feoda militum de eadem.

Willelmus de Munceus ii. feoda militum et dimidium de eadem.

Thomas de Warblinton' ij. feoda militum et dimidium de eadem.

Robertus de Hasting' vij. feoda militum de eadem.

Ricardus de Esburham [1] ij. feoda militum de eadem.

Heres de Richemore [2] j. feodum militis de eadem.

Willelmus Mowyn iij. feoda militum de eadem.

Rogerus Wascelyn [3] j. feodum et dimidium de eadem.

Heres de Keyhell' j. feodum de eadem.

Hamon de Creuquer j. feodum militis de eadem.

Thomas filius Godefridi dimidium feodum militis de eadem.

Willelmus de Godinges j. quarterium feodi unius militis de eadem.

Breve.

Isti tenent de domino Rege in capite in comitatu Sussex.

Andreas Peverel tenet duas partes feodi unius militis in Blechinton' de honore de Morteyn. Breve. [4]

Ricardus [5] Cardi [6] et Philippus de Beverinton' terciam partem unius feodi militis in Beverinton'. In rotulo. [7]

Johannes de Say j. parvum feodum militis in Fernette cum [8] herede Johannis de Wauton' de honore de Morteyn. In rotulo. [7]

Johannes [9] de Gatesden' tenet cum herede Ricardi de Kaynes iij. feoda in Horsted, Iteford, et Selmeston'. In rotulo.

Arund. [10] Johannes et Hubertus de Wykes tenent j. feodum militis in Wyke Rumbald de Radulfo Touny. [11] In rotulo.

Abbas [9] de Ponte Roberti tenet ij. feoda militum in Sutton' de Margaria de Ripariis. In rotulo.

Isti tenent de Archiepiscopo Cantuarienai in comitatu Sussex.

Willelmus de la Faleyse et Willelmus de Lovinton' tenent dimidium feodum militis in Westlovinton' de eodem archiepiscopo.

Thomas de Lageners [12] quartam partem feodi unius militis in Lageners de eodem archiepiscopo.

Archiepiscopus [13] Cantuarienais non respondet hic.


[1] B. reads Esburburham.
[2] B. reads Richenore. But cf. Red Book of the Exchequer, pp. 554, 623, which read Cuchenore.
[3] B. reads Wacelyn.
[4] B. omits Breve.
[5] Before this entry B. inserts Heredes Gilberti le Franc tenent terciam partem feodi j. militis in Burne de honore Mortoyn'.
[6] B. appears to read Card' written over an erasure.
[7] B. omits in rotulo.
[8] B. omits cum ... Wauton, and adds a marginal note xxv.s.
[9] B. omits this entry.
[10] B. omits this marginal note.
[11] B. reads de Thony.
[12] B. reads Laueners, [13] B. omits this note.

SUSSEX. 693

S.ij.19. m.6. II.61-65. S.ij.19. m.4. II.66-70 - cont.

Thomas de Wygeshell' tenet j. feodum militis de comite Herfordie. [1] Breve.

Episcopus [2] Cycestrensis tenet de domino rege in capite iij. feoda militis et dimidium in comitatu Sussex. Respondet in rotulo prelatorum de eodem auxilio.

Surr' et Sussex in libra.

SOUTHAMPTON.

S.ij.20.II.96-116.

COMITATUS SUHT'.

Feuda militum que tenentur de Roberto de Sancto Johanne in comitatu Suht', videlicet in hundredo de Menestok. [3]

Nicolaus de Cornhamet' tenet unum feudum militis de veteri feffamento de Roberto de Sancto Johanne, et idem Robertus de rege.

Johannes de Westbyr' tenet in Westbyr' de eodem feudum militis de veteri feffamento, et idem de rege.

Willelmus de Arundell' tenet in Hupton' feudum militis de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Johannes de Kernet tenet quartam partem feudi unius militis in Avene de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Alexander Huscarle tenet in eadem tres partes feudi unius militis de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Albreda de Lingyvre tenet in Perle dimidium feudum militis de Willelmo de la Falese, et idem de Roberto de Sancto Johanne, et idem Robertus de domino rege in capite.

Heredes Philippi de la Hume, Ricardus Bacun, et Hugo de Murthing tenent feudum militis in Hume, Cnapp' et in Murthing de Albreda de Botereaus, et ipsa de eodem Roberto, et idem de rege.

Lucia de Limes' tenet in Middelton' dimidium feudum militis de Johanne de Kemet, et idem de eodem Roberto, et Robertus de rege in capite.

Robertus de Sancto Johanne tenet in Chauton' feudum militis de veteri feffamento de rege in capite.

Robertus de Wodecote tenet in eadem decimam partem feudi militis de eodem, et idem de rege in capite.

Johannes de Chauton' tenet in eadem decimam partem unius feudi de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege in capite.

Willelmus de Arundel tenet in Liddesathe dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de eodem Roberto, et idem de rege in capite.


[1] B. adds in rapo de Hasting'.
[2] B. omits this entry.
[3] Only the first two entries relate to the hundred of Meonstoke.

694 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Johannes de Reyny tenet in Stubbinton' dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de Reginaldo de Mohun, et idem de eodem Roberto, et idem de rege in capite.

Willelmus de Stratton' tenet Sugginwrth' per unum feudum militis de veteri feffamento de eodem Roberto, et idem de rege in capite.

Prior de Boxgrave tenet in Hok quintam partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege in capite.

Domina Eva de Escures tenet Wikham pro duobus feudis militum de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege in capite.

Henricus de Wodecote tenet duo feuda militum in Clere et in Wodecote de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Petrus de Pirfist tenet dimidium feudum militis in Ywhurst de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege in capite.

Ada de Sancto Maneveto tenet unum feudum militis in Hecfeld' de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Andreas de Portesya tenet dimidium feudum militis in Hocthon' et dimidium feodum in Stanbrigg' de veteri feffamento de eodem Roberto, et idem de rege.

Johannes de Kernet tenet in Chardeford' feudum militis et dimidium feudum de veteri feffamento de eodem Roberto, et idem de rege.

Willelmus de Falaysa tenet dimidium feudum militis in Rokeseya de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Hugo de Goddeshull' et Gilebertus de Hattingelig' tenent in Ibbeslig' terciam partem feudi militis de eodem Roberto, et idem de rege.

Nicholaus de Molis tenet in Chardeford' feudum unius militis de veteri feffamento, [1] et idem de rege.

Nicholaus Rastel tenet in ... feudum unius militis de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Galfridus de Arundel tenet in Oclig' feudum unius militis de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Ricardus Wastehus' tenet in Sireburn' quintam partem feudi unius militis de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem Robertus de rege.

Henricus de Wodecot' tenet in Lidesulfe feudum unius militis de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Thomas de Port et Margeria de Cundy tenent quatuor partes unius feudi in Snodington' de veteri feffamento de Roberto de Pundelarch', et idem de Roberto de Sancto Johanne, et idem de rege.

Robertus de Anesya tenet unum feudum militis in Sirefeld' de veteri feffamento de Ricardo de Anesya, et idem Ricardus de Roberto predicto, et idem Robertus de rege.

Abbas de Natelig' tenet in Hona feudum unius militis de Ricardo de Hona, et idem Ricardus de Roberto de Sancto Johanne, et idem de rege in capite, et est vetus feffamentum.


[1] After feffamento supply de eodem Roberto.

SOUTHAMPTON. 695

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Henricus de Kernet tenet in Kernettesside quintam partem feudi unius militis de veteri feffamento de eodem Roberto, et idem de rege.

Andreas de Portesya tenet in Froditon' unum feudum de veteri feffamento de eodem Roberto, et idem de rege.

Herebertus de Borhunta tenet Borhunta pro duobus feudis militum de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Emericus de Saucy [1] tenet Wydelig' pro uno feudo militis de domina Eva de Clynton', et ipsa de Roberto de Sancto Johanne, et idem de rege, et est vetus feffamentum.

Herebertus filius Petri tenet in Brochampton' dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Thomas de Port tenet Anam le Port pro uno feudo militis de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Heredes Ade de Spineto tenent Cumepton' cum pertinenciis pro duobus feudis de veteri feffamento de Hugone de Raumppeny, et idem de Eva de Scures, et ipsa de dicto Roberto, et idem de rege.

Galfridus de Cundy tenet dimidium feudum militis in Chulewarton' de veteri feffamento de Roberto de Braybuf, et idem de Roberto de Sancto Johanne, et idem de rege.

Robertus de Sancto Johanne tenet in Abbodeston' dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de episcopo Wintoniensi, et idem de rege.

Robertus de Tregot tenet in Candever Abbatis dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento, [2] et idem Henricus de eodem Roberto, et idem Robertus de rege.

Radulfus de Kamays, prior de Portesdon' et Radulfus de Punda tenent in Hameledon' unum feudum militis de veteri feffamento de Willelmo de Percy, et idem Willelmus de Roberto de Sancto Johanne, et idem Robertus de rege.

Rogerus de Ho tenet Ho pro dimidio feudo de veteri feffamento de Reginaldo de Mohun, et idem de Roberto de Sancto Johanne, et idem de rege.

Habet breve. In rotulo.

Feuda militum que tenentur de Comite Saresberie in comitatu Suht'.

Johannes de Brembelsite tenet unum feudum militis in Brembelsite de veteri feffamento de comite Saresberie, et idem de rege in capite.

Hamo de Bathameton' et Galfridus filius Johannis tenent unum feodum militis in Chardeford de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et idem de rege.

Ricardus filius Alcheri tenet in Biketon' iij. partes feudi unius militis in Biketon' de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Andreas de Porteseya tenet in Copenhever iij. partes unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Habet breve. In rotulo.


[1] The c in this word is written like a bad e.
[2] Some words must be missing here.

696 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Feuda Johannis de Munemue in comitatu Suht'.

Item Johannes de Campeny tenet Wyneketon' que spectat ad aliud feudum quod habet in Wiltesir' per unum feudum militis de baronia Walteri Walerand de veteri feffamento de Johanne de Munemue, et idem Johannes de rege in capite. In rotulo.

Robertus de Treigoz tenet in Urleston' dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de eodem Johanne, et idem de rege in capite. In rotulo.

Johannes de Munemue, Albreda de Boteraus, et Johana de Nuvile tenent in Dene dimidiam hydam terre de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite, set nescitur quo servicio. Inquiratur.

Feuda que H. filius Petri tenet, et que tenentur de eo in comitatu Suht'.

Petrus de Anesye et participes sui tenent Werldham pro dimidio feudo militis de veteri feffamento de Herberto filio Petri, et idem de rege.

Johannes Lancelevee tenet in Pralligesworph viij. partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Idem Herbertus tenet Wlferton' et Oclye de veteri feffamento pro ij. feudis militum, set nescitur quo servicio.

Heredes Roberti le Marchant tenent in Busemerhale dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de eodem Herberto, et idem de rege.

Hugo filius Radulfi tenet in Estleg' terciam partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem Herberto, et idem de rege.

Johannes Lanceleveie tenet in Haniton' dimidium feudum militis de eodem Herberto, et idem de rege in capite.

Habet breve.

Feuda que Willelmus Mauduit tenet, et que tenentur de eo in comitatu Suht'.

Willelmus Mauduit tenet in Hurtlye dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento per serianteriam camerarie domini regis in capite.

Gilbertus Cunan tenet in eadem villa vj. partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege.

Nicholaus de Haveresham tenet in eadem xx. partem unius feudi militis de eodem, et idem de rege.

Willelmus de Burhunte tenet in eadem xx. partem unius feudi militis de eodem, et idem de rege.

Robertus de Bello Aneto tenet in Estburhunte dimidiam hydam terre de eodem, et idem de rege per eandem serianteriam.

In rotulo. [1]

Feuda que tenentur de Comite Herefordie in comitatu Suhamton'.

Lamvallus Pancevot tenet in Wordie iujtam partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de comite Herefordie, et idem de rege.


[1] Habet breve de respectu cancelled and replaced by In rotulo.

SOUTHAMPTON. 697

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Arnulfus de Mandevile tenet in Parva Sunburn' dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de Lamvallo Pancevot, et Lamvallus de comite Herefordie, et idem de rege in capite.

Idem Lamvallus tenet in Maihiweston' dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et comes de rege.

Willelmus de la Faleyse tenet in villa de Forda duas hydas terre in villa de Forda de veteri feffamento pro iijbus partibus unius feudi militis de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Hugo de Burgate tenet in Porde feudum unius militis de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et idem de rege in capite.

Girad' de Wollop tenet feudum unius militis in Wollop de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Thomas de Chelewarton' tenet in Chelewarton' iij. partes unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et comes de rege.

Agnes Peverel tenet Chelewarton' pro dimidio feudo militis de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et comes de rege.

Thomas Mauduit tenet in Grateleya unum feudum militis de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Habet breve. In rotulo.

Feuda que tenentur de Comite Arundell' in comitatu Suhamt'.

Hugo de Hoivile tenet in Fonteleg' iiijtam partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de comite Arundell', et idem de rege.

Hugo Sturmi, Rogerus falconarius, Willelmus Martel tenent duas hydas terre in villa de Nithimbre de veteri feffamento de comite Arundell' per servicium falconarie, et comes de rege.

Prior de Rungeton' tenet in Heyllng' iiijor hydatas terre de veteri feffamento de comite Arundell', et comes de rege.

Comes Arundell' tenet in Henton' unum feudum militis de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite.

Radulfus de Suneworth' tenet Suneworth' pro feudo unius militis de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Thomas Tyrel tenet in Katerringeton' unum feudum unius militis de veteri feffamento de comite Arundell', et idem de rege.

Idem comes tenet quandam terram que vocatur La Buinthe que solvit eidem comiti xij.s. quando scutagium currit, et comes de rege in capite.

Prior de Suwyk tenet in Westburhunte dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de comite Arundell', et idem de rege.

Rogerus de Merlay et Galfridus de Baumunt tenent Drayton' pro iiija parte unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Item abbas de Nateleye tenet sextam partem feudi unius militis in Totinton' et Therstewode de novo feffamento de Willelmo de Hamton', et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite.

698 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Idem abbas tenet de eodem dimidium feudum militis in Welewe de novo feffamento, et idem [1] rege in capite.

Habet breve. In rotulo.

Feuda et tenementa que tenentur per serianteriam de domino Rege in capite.

Johannes persona de Yvetis et Andreas de Yvetis tenent dimidiam hydam terre apud Yvetis per serianteriam xl. dierum cum j. habergello ad custum suum in Anglia de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite.

Reginaldus Baudet tenet ibidem j. virgatam terre de veteri feffamento per c. sagittas solvendas domino regi annuatim.

Ricardus de Elinges tenet in Elingea j. virgatam terre de veteri feffamento per serianteriam ferendi brevia vicecomitis in Insulam et ad faciendum ibidem attachiamenta domini regis.

Rogerus de Langeford' tenet c. solidatas terre in Avene et medictatem ville de Westedderl' de veteri feffamento per serianteriam inveniendi unum servientem per xl. dies in Anglia ad custum suum cum j. habergello, capello ferreo et lancia.

Galfridus Sturmi tenet villam de Ebbeford' racione custodie heredum Willelmi Spilleman' de veteri feffamento per serianteriam xl. dierum ad custum suum in Anglia.

Willelmus de Butesthorne et Johannes de Yvetis, custos heredis Reginaldi de Buttesthorn', tenent v.s. redditus in Eyslye de veteri feffamento, et pertinet ad serianteriam que tenetur per servicium xl. dicrum.

Johannes de Yvetia, custos heredis Reginaldi predicti, tenet in Rinkewode quoddam tenementum quod computatur pro dimidia serianteria sua de veteri feffamento, quam facit domino regi per xl. dies.

Willelmus de Butesthorne tenet in eadem quartam partem j. serianterie de Andrea de Yvetia de veteri feffamento, et idem de domino rege in capite, et pertinet ad serianteriam dicti Andree, quam facit domino regi xl. dies.

Elyas de la Faleise tenet Rugenor [2] domino rege in capite de veteri feffamento per serianteriam existendi in castro Wintonie per xl. dies ad custum suum.

Jacobus de Hochangr' tenet Hochangr' per serianteriam xl. dierum ad custum suum de veteri feffamento cum perpuncto, capello ferreo et lancia, et est dimidium feudum militis.

Radulfus de Mortuo Mari tenet quandam partem de Wordy de domino rege in capite, set nescitur quo servicio.

Alanus de la Shusche tenet in Liddesulde duas hydas terre racione custodie heredis Briani de Stopham de veteri feffamento per serianteriam ad custodiendam lardariam domini regis.


[1] After idem supply de.
[2] After Rugenor supply de.

SOUTHAMPTON. 699

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Phillippus de Novavilla tenet in Frolebyr' dimidiam hydam terre de veteri feffamento per serianteriam custodiendi hostium camere domine regine.

Willelmus de Edmundestrop tenet in Edmundestrop unam virgatam terre de veteri feffamento per serianteriam custodiendi forestam de Witlingel'.

Herbertus filius Mathei tenet terram que fuit Gilberti de Everleye de veteri feffamento per serianteriam custodiendi quandam ballivam de foresta de Windlesor' racione custodie heredis dicti Gilberti de Everleye.

Ricardus de Kardevill' tenet Chuderleg' et La Hale de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite per serianteriam xl. dierum cum j. habergello, lancia et capello ferreo.

Amiria [1] de Gurdon tenet xij. libratas terre in Tistede et Seleburn' de dono domini Johannis Regis per serianteriam j. servientis.

Ricardus de Kardevill' tenet medietatem Westthuderl' de veteri feffamento per serianteriam quod inveniet domino regi unum servientem ad custum suum per xl. dies in Anglia cum habergello, capello ferreo et lancia.

Ricardus de Brikevill' tenet dimidiam hydam terre in Benetleg' de veteri feffamento per serianteriam inveniendi domino regi j. servientem per xl. dies ad custum suum in Anglia cum xl. sagittis.

Hugo de Chukehull' tenet Uliveston' de veteri feffamento per serianteriam inveniendi j. hominem peditem per xl. dies ad custum suum cum arcu et sagittis in Anglia.

Andreas Peverel tenet c. solidatas terre in Berton' de veteri feffamento per serianteriam essendi cum equis et armis in servicio domini regis, set nescitur per quantum tempus.

Petrus de Cosham tenet terram suam in Cosham per serianteriam de veteri feffamento ad faciendum servicium suum ad castrum Porcestrie per xl. dies.

Herbelinus de Burhunte tenet j. serianteriam de veteri feffamento, et facit servicium suum in castro Porcestrie per quindecim dies.

Adam de Wanstede tenet unam serianteriam de veteri feffamento et facit servicium suum in castro Porcestrie per viij. dies.

Fulco de Wymeringes tenet j. serianteriam de veteri feffamento ad faciendum servicium suum in castro Porcestrie per viij. dies.

Petrus de la Bere tenet terram suam in La Bere de veteri feffamento ad reddendum ad castrum Porcestrie dimidiam marcam.

Thomas Mauduit tenet Scauden' de Willelmo Mauduit de cameraria, et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite.

Thomas de Warbling' tenet Syrfeld' per marescallciam [2] de domino rege de veteri feffamento, set nescitur per quam.


[1] II.104 adds the following note:- Servicium istius seriantie mutatum in servicium militare, videlicet de dimidio feodo militis. per cartam Regis Henrici tercii confirmatam per Regem Edwardum, filium ipsius Regis Henrici, que irrotulatur in rotulo memorandorum de termino Sancti Michaelis anno regni ipsius Regis Edwardi xxxiij. finieute.
[2] Over marescallciam, seriantiam is inserted in a later hand.

700 A.D. 1242-1241

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Johannes Scaty [1] tenet Stepeleye de veteri feffamento per serianteriam xl. dierum cum equis et armis.

Feuda que tenentur de domino Rege in capite, set nescitur quo servicio.

Ferantus balistarius tenet in villa de Munestok' c. solidatas terre, set nescitur quo servicio, de novo feffamento.

Hugo de Turri tenet in eadem villa xl. solidatas terre de novo feffamento, set nescitur quo servicio.

Ricardus de Rivers et Johannes de Pleciis, custos heredum Johannis Byset, tenent in Burgat' unam virgatam terre cum pertinenciis de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite, set nessitur quo servicio.

Auda que fuit uxor Willelmi Blom' tenet quandam terram in Lidesworth', que est eschaeta Normanorum de dono domini regis, set nessitur quo servicio.

Galfridus de Ba tenet in Westmapelderham c. solidatas terre que fuit de terra Normanorum de dono domini regia.

Ricardus de Rivera tenet in Manesbrig' c. solidatas terre de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite &c.

Comes de Aubemara tenet Wymering' cum pertinenciis de veteri feffamento pro dimidia hyda terre de domino rege in capite, et est de terris Normannorum &c.

Milo de Bello Campo tenet in manerio de Tichefeld' c. solidatas de veteri feffamento, nessitur quo servicio.

Feuda que tenentur de Comite Waren' in capite.

Willelmus Agulon tenet Gretham de comite Waren' per feudum militis de veteri feffamento, et idem de rege.

In rotulo.

Item de feudis que tenentur de Radulfo de Clera in comitatu Suht'.

Abbas de Bello Loco tenet in Suberton' feudum unius militis de novo feffamento de herede Radulfi de Clera, et idem Radulfus in capite.

In rotulo. [2]

Feuda militum que tenentur de Abbate de Hyda.

Ricardus de Wollop tenet in Suberton' quintam partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de H. filio Petri, et idem H. de abbate de Hyda, et abbas de rege in capite.

Hamon de Midlingeton' tenet in eadem villa xvjam partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem H., et idem de abbate, et abbas de rege in capite.

Herbertus de Caunne tenet feudum unius militis in Drayton' de veteri feffamento de Roberto de Breibuz, et idem Robertus de Roberto


[1] Read Caty, as in Charter Roll, 35 Hen. III, m.13.
[2] Habet breve has been struck out.

SOUTHAMPTON. 701

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

de Sancto Johanne, et idem de abbate de Hyda, et abbas de rege in capite.

Iden Hebertus [1] tenet terciam partem unius feudi militis in eadem villa de veteri feffamento de abbate de Hyda, et abbas de rege in capite.

Robertus de Breibuf tenet unum feudum militis in Cranburn' de veteri feffamento de Roberto de Sancto Johanne, et idem de dicto abbate, et abbas de rege in capite.

Willelmus de Stratton' tenet in Stratton' dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de Roberto de Breibuf, et idem Robertus de Roberto de Sancto Johanne, et idem Robertus de dicto abbate, et abbas de rege in capite.

Gilbertus de Popham tenet dimidium feudum militis in Popham de veteri feffamento de Roberto de Breibuf, et idem de Roberto de Sancto Johanne, et idem Robertus de abbate de Hyda, et abbas de rege in capite.

Idem Gilbertus tenet dimidium feudum militis in eadem villa de Roberto de Ponte Arhe, [2] et idem de abbate de Hyda, et abbas de rege in capite.

Willelmus Mansel tenet in Sarweton' dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de Roberto de Breibuf, et idem Robertus de Roberto de Sancto Johanne, et idem de abbate de Hyda, et abbas de rege in capite.

Philippus de Thotteford, Philippus le Butelyr, Petrus de Fraxino et Henricus le Franklein tenent in Tottheford vque hidas terre de veteri feffamento pro uno feudo militis de abbate de Hyda, et abbas de rege in capite.

Herbertus filius Petri tenet in Bethameton' ij. feuda militum de veteri feffamento, de abbate de Hyda, et de rege in capite.

Abbas de Hyda tenet in Candevre et in Wodemannecote duo feuda militum de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite in puram elemosinam.

Idem tenet in Candevre dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite.

Feuda militum que Comes Devonie tenet de domino rege in capite, et que tenentur ab eo in comitatu S. Habet breve. In rotulo.

Comes Devonie tenet Rhumbrig' et Langel' pro xa parte unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite.

Idem tenet Cristehurch' de domino rege in capite de veteri feffamento, set nescitur quo servicio.

Prior de Cristchurch' tenet in eadem villa quedam tenementa et terras de veteri feffamento de dicto comite in puram et perpetuam elemosinam.

Henricus Trenchard tenet in Sharprixe et Hordhull' dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de dicto comite, et comes de rege in capite.


[1] Read Idem Herbertus.
[2] Read Arche.

702 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Nigellus de Boclande, Ricardus Bacun, Henricus Longus, Simon de Ernewode et Ricardus de Farnhull' tenent in Ernewod' quartam partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Heredes Johel' de Granges tenent in Dunekton' quartam partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Reginaldus de Albamara tenet Hammes et Henton' pro iiija parte unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Hamo de Bachameton' et Droco de Teinton' tenent in Bachameton' unum feudum militis de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Johannes Lancelevee tenet in Museclive viijvam partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Gregorius et Matil' de Kene tenent in Henton' dimidiam hidam terre de veteri feffamento per viij. partem unius feudi militis de eodem comite, et idem de rege in capite.

Alexander Cridiho et Ricardus de Purisute tenent in Purisute dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de Matheo de Columbariis, et ipse de Marescallo, et Marescallus de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Lambertus Saumon, Johannes de Ckingbrig' et Cristina de Kingbrig' tenent dimidium feudum militis in Kinbrig' et West Thuddeleye de veteri feffamento de Matheo de Columbariis, et idem de Marescallo, et idem Marescallus de comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Willelmus de Redvers tenet in Estden' terciam partem unius feudi militis de eodem comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Feuda militum que Fulco de Muntgumeri tenet de domino rege in capite, et que tenentur ab eo. Habet breve. In rotulo.

Fulco de Muntgumeri tenet ix.l. terre de dono domini regis de novo feffamento, set nescitur quo servicio.

Willelmus de Lucy, Alienora Cotele, et Acelina Cotele [1] tenent in Burgton' dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de eodem Fulcone, et de rege in capite.

Jacobus de Burgton' et Henricus de la Mare tenent in eadem villa dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de eodem Fulcone, et idem de rege in capite.

Johannes Cheverun tenet in eadem villa viij. partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem Fulcone, et idem de rege in capite.

Walterus Whytun tenet in eadem x. partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege in capite.

Heredes Thome le Waleys tenent in eadem villa x. partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de eodem, et idem de rege in capite.


[1] Cotele repeated in error.

SOUTHAMPTON. 703

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Idem Fulco de Muntgumeri tenet totum residuum dicti manerii de Burgton' de dono domini regis de novo feffamento, et est escaeta Normannorum, set nescitur quo servicio.

Feuda militum que Petronilla de Vallibus tenet de domino rege, et que tenentur de ea. In rotulo.

Petronilla de Vallibus tenet Warneburn' de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite, et est quoddam membrum baronie sue, set nescitur quo servicio.

Stephanus de Bendinges tenet in eodem manerio de eadem x. partem feudi unius militis de veteri feffamento, et ipsa de rege in capite.

Robertus Dandely tenet in eodem manerio terciam partem unius militis de veteri feffamento de eadem, et ipsa [1] rege in capite.

Feuda que Johannes de Venuz tenet de domino rege in capite, et que tenentur de eo in eodem comitatu. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Cobbeham tenet in Flexlande iiij. partem unius feudi militis de veteri feffamento de Roberto de Ponte Arch', et idem de Johanne de Venuz, et Johannes de rege in capite.

Idem Johannes de Venuz tenet villam de Nutlye de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite per serianteriam quod antecessores sui fuerunt marescalli de hospicio domini regis.

Feuda que Thomas de Windlesore tenet de domino rege et que tenentur ab eo in comitatu Suht'.

Thomas de Windlesor' tenet in Suberton' x.l. terre de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite per serianteriam scaccarii. Loquendum.

Item Johannes de Gatesden tenet Elinges pro una hyda terre de novo feffamento pro xa parte unius feudi militis de domino rege in capite. N. In rotulo. Loquendum.

Item Johannes filius Galfridi tenet Rinkwode de domino rege in capite de novo feffamento. [2] Loquendum.

Item Johannes de Valle Torta tenet j. feudum militis in Willchale de veteri feffamento de Willelmo de Windlesor', et idem de Hugone de Hauldeley, et idem de domino rege in capite. In rotulo.

Emericus de Sacy tenet Berton' cum pertinenciis pro uno feudo militis de novo feffamento de domino rege in capite. In rotulo.

Sibilla de la Bere tenet in Ierdelye dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de Willelmo de Windlesor', et idem de rege in capite.


[1] After ipsa, supply de.
[2] Calendar of Charter Rolls, vol. i. p. 253.

704 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Fenda que tenentur de Comite Marescallo in comitatu Suht. Habet breve. In rotulo.

Comes Marescallus tenet unum feudum militis in Cilcestre de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite.

Andreas de Hocton' tenet in Hogton' dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de comite Marescallo, et comes de rege in capite.

Willelmus Talemach' tenet dimidium feudum militis in Hupsumburn et Assel' de veteri feffamento de comite, et comes de rege.

Radulfus de Mortuo Mari tenet in villa de Stanbrig' dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de Simone de Monte Forti, et idem de comite Maracallo, et comes de rege.

Thomas Maudut tenet ciuas partes feudi unius militis in Dena de veteri feffamento de comite Marescallo, et comes de domino rege in capite.

Ricardus de Wollop tenet in villa de Wollop iiij. partes feudi unius militis de Hereberto filio Petri, et idem Herebertus de comite Marescallo, et comes de rege.

Philippus de Sancto Philberto, Bertholomeus de Saccavill' et Johannes de Sancto Quintino tenent Clatford' de Ricardo Sward' de novo feffamento, et Ricardus de Marescallo, et comes de domino rege in capite, et est de terris Normannorum.

Feuda que tenentur de Honore de Richemund in comitatu Suht'.

Habet breve. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Gardinis tenet in La Lige terciam partem feudi unius militis racione custodie heredis Johannis le Bret de veteri feffamento de honore de Richmund de P. de Sauveye, et idem de rege.

Rogerus Mark' tenet in La Lye quandam terram per servicium transfretandi cum domino rege de veteri feffamento de dicto honore.

Laurencius Talebot tenet in Crofton' duo feuda militum de veteri feffamento de Michaele de Forniwaus, et idem Michael de honore de Richemund.

Feuda que Radulfus de Mortuo Mari tenet de domino rege, et que tenentur ab eo. In rotulo. [1]

Radulfus de Mortuo Mari tenet dimidium feudum in Stratfeld' de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite.

Galfridus de Wynclefford' tenet in Anna Savage duas partes unius feudi de veteri feffamento de Radulfo de Mortuo Mari, et idem Radulfus de domino rege in capite.

Johannes de Bottelig' tenet Bottelig' cum pertinenciis per feudum j. militis de veteri feffamento de Radulfo de Mortuo Mari, et idem de rege.

Rogerus Alys tenet Auditon' per dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de Isabella de Mortuo Mari, et ipsa de rege in capite.


[1] Habet breve de respectu super compotum struck out.

SOUTHAMPTON. 705

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Feuda et tenemente que gentes de religione tenent de domino rege.

Abbas de Tichefeld tenet Tichefeld' de domino rege in capite de novo feffamento, et est de terra Normannorum.

Idem tenet Swannewyk per episcopum Abricensem de novo feffamento.

Abbas Glovernie tenet Linkeholt de veteri feffamento in puram elemosinam de Radulfo de Hasting', et idem Radulfus de domino rege in capite.

Prior de Okeburn' tenet Cumb' cum pertinenciis de veteri feffamento in puram elemosinam de Radulfo de Hasting', et idem de domino rege.

Abbas de Batayle tenet Coueholt de veteri feffamento de domino rege in puram elemosinam.

Priorissa de Ambreabir' tenet in Wollop xl. libratas terre de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite.

Prior de Helinge tenet terram quam habet in Heling' de veteri feffamento in puram elemosinam de domino rege in capite.

Prior de Domo Dei de Portesm' tenet dimidium feudum militis in Froditon' de veteri de Hugone de Playz, et idem de comite Warunie, et comes de rege in capite.

Abbas de Tichefeld' tenet Wallesworth', quod fuit feudum unius militis de honore Willelmi de Mandevill' de dono domini Petri Wintoniensis episcopi proximi defuncti. Habet breve. Loquendum cum baronibus.

Feuda que tenentur de Johanne de Stotevill', et que idem tenet de rege. In rotulo. [1]

Robertus de Say tenet feudum unius militis in Syrefeld' [2] de veteri feffamento de Johanne de Stutevull', et idem de rege in capite.

Johannes de Ierdelig' et Nicholaus Kupping', Johannes persona de la Dena tenent in Oclig' quintam partem feudi unius militis de veteri feffamento de Roberto de Gray, et idem de Johanne de Stotevill', et Johannes de rege in capite.

Item Henricus de Bromeshull' tenet feudum dimidii militis de veteri feffamento de heredibus Willelmi de Torevull', qui tenent de honore Warwyc'. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Mungaus tenet iij. partes feudi unius militis in Cumpton' de veteri feffamento per seriantiam de Thoma Maudut (sic), et idem de domino rege. In rotulo.

Item Punz Blanchard tenet Huphusseburn' de feffamento domini Ricardi Regis Anglie per feudum dimidii militis de domino rege in capite. In rotulo.

Item Gilbertus de Berneval tenet in Farham feudum unius militis de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite. In rotulo.

Item Nicholaus de Molis tenet in Wollop feudum unius militis de novo feffamento de domino rege, et est de terra Normannorum. Habet breve. In rotulo.


[1] Habet breve struck out.
[2] Read Stratfeld'.

706 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Item Leticia de Sausay tenet in villa de Bosinton' decimam partem unius feudi de veteri feffamento de Jordano la Warre, et idem de Galiena de Turvill', et eadem de domino rege. In rotulo.

Item Rogerus de Vilyrs tenet in Putlesworth' sextam partem feudi unius milite de veteri feffamento de Roberto de Gumay, et idem Robertus de rege. In rotulo.

Item Ricardus de Peresut' tenet dimidiam hydatam terre in Benetfeld' de veteri feffamento de Willelmo de Munciaus, et idem Willelmus de Thoma de Warblington', et Thomas de comite Devonie, et idem comes de domino rege in capite. N. Breve. [1] In rotulo.

Item Nicholaus de Molis, Robertus de Punchard' et Reginaldus de Punchard' tenent duas hydas terre de veteri feffamento pertinentes ad manerium de Faccumbe, unde dominus de Faccumbe ipsos debet aquietare de scutagio. Breve.

Item Ricardus de Punchardon' tenet Faccumba cum pertinenciis de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite per feudum unius militis. In rotulo.

Item Ricardus de Dena tenet dimidium feodum militis in Hogton' de veteri feffamento de Roberto de Pundelarch', et idem Robertus de Willelmo de Bello Camppo, et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite. In rotulo.

Item Philippus Croc tenet dimidium feudum militis in Eston' Croc de veteri feffamento de domino de Chet, et idem de domino rege in capite. In rotulo.

Item Henricus le Duyn tenet in villa de Septon' dimidium feudum de veteri feffamento de Simone le Duyn, et idem Simon de comite Kent', et idem comes de rege in capite. In rotulo.

Item Petrus de Kenet' tenet in Septon' ij. feuda militum de veteri de Roberto de Tregoys, et idem Robertus de domino rege in capite. Habet breve.

Item Henricus de Woxkot' tenet unum feudum militis in Foxkot' de veteri feffamento de Johanna de Nevill', et eadem de domino rege in capite. In rotulo.

Feuda que Patricius de Chauurch' tenet de domino rege, et que tenentur ab eo. Habet breve. In rotulo.

Patricius de Chauurches tenet duo feuda militum in Sumburn' cum pertinenciis de feffamento domini Ricardi Regis Anglie et dimidium feudum in Langestok de veteri feffamento de domino in capite.

Radulfus Payn tenet in villa de Sumburn' dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento de domina Johanna Briwer', et ipsa de Patricio de Chaurces, et idem de domino rege in capite.

Feuda que tenentur de Honore Glovernie in comitatu Suht'.

Item Johannes le Walays et Robertus de Dona tenent dimidium feudum militis de veteri feffamento in Hogton' de Galfrido de Lauriton', et idem de Roberto de Mesy, et idem de honore Glovernie. In rotulo.


[1] Possibly X. Breve is struck out.

SOUTHAMPTON. 707

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Item Radulfus de Auvcrs tenet dims hydas terre in Heling' de veteri feffamento de honore Glovernie, set nessitur quo servicio. Inquiratur per quod servicium et dis' pro'scutagio.

Item Radulfus de la Falayse et Robertus Mercator tenent in Mapeldreham iij. partes feudi unius militis de veteri feffamento de comite Glovernie. In rotulo.

Heredes Roberti de Mesy tenent Peniton' pro dimidio feudo de veteri feffamento de Roberto de Mesy, et idem de comite Glovernie. In rotulo.

Feuda que tenentur de Comite Kencie. Inquiratur sicut supra et dis' pro scutagio. In rotulo.

Thomas de Columb' tenet unam hydam terre in Lokerhg' de comite Kencie de veteri feffamento, et comes de rege.

Simon le Duyn tenet Tudeworth pro uno milite de veteri feffamento de H. de Burgo, et idem de rege.

Feuda que tenentur de Igeramo de Pratellis. In rotulo.

Willelmus Musard tenet iiijtam partem feudi unius militis in Elenden' [1] de veteri feffamento de Igeramo de Pratellis, et idem de domino rege.

Galfridus le Chamberlayn tenet de eodem Farlig' de veteri feffamento per feudum dimidii unius militis, et idem de domino rege in capite.

Feuda que Robertus de Pundelarch' tenet de domino rege, et que tenentur ab eo. In rotulo.

Robertus de Pundelarch' tenet unum feudum militis in Niwenton' de veteri feffamento de Radulfo Russel', et idem de domino rege in capite.

Johannes de Cormayles tenet in Turkeleston' feudum unius militis de Roberto de Pundelarch' de veteri feffamento, et idem Robertus de domino rege.

Feuda que tenentur de Avicia de Columbariis et de Matheo de Columbariis. In rotulo.

Thomas de Chulewarton' tenet feudum unius militis in Chulewarton' de Matheo de Columbariis de veteri feffamento, et idem de domino rege in capite.

Willelmus de Toreny, Radulfus Sanzaver tenent feudum unius militis in Enham de veteri feffamento de Avicia de Columbariis, et eadem de domino rege.

Philippus Croc tenet iiij. partes feudi unius militis in Toneworth' de veteri feffamento de Avicia de Columbariis, et ipsa de domino rege.


[1] Cumpton is cancelled and is followed by per serianteriam, which is struck through.

708 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.II.96-116 - cont.

Diversa feuda.

Thomas Maudut tenet decimam partem feudi j. militis in Wollop' de veteri feffamento de Radulfo Haringgod, et idem de Avicia Croc, et eadem Avicia de domino rege. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Loverays tenet unam hydam terre in Westuderlig' per iiij. partem feudi unius militis de veteri feffamento de Aubrea de Boteraus, et ipsa de domino rege in capite. In rotulo.

Willelmus Agulun tenet c. solidatas terre de domino rege in capite in Warblington' de feudo Roberti de Curcy, et continet terra illa iiij. hidatas terre reddendo annuatim domino regi unum par calcarium. Inquiratur per quod servicium teneat.

Herebertus filius Mathei tenet residuum dicti manerii per eundem [1] servicium quo Robertus de Curcy illud tenuit de domino rege. Habet breve.

Rogerus de Merlay tenet Froditon' [2] pro dimidio feudo militis de veteri feffamento de Hereberto filio Mathei, et idem de domino rege in capite. Breve. In rotulo.

Herebertus filius Mathei tenet Esteney pro iiij. hydis terre de veteri feffamento de domino rege in capite, set quo servicio. Breve. In rotulo.

Hugo de Foresta tenet unum feodum militis in Norton' et Sutton' de comite Pictavie de honore de Walingeford'. Habet breve. In rotulo.

Mabillia de Scotteney tenet dimidium feudum unius militis in Sutton' de honore de Eou.

[Endorsed:-] Suthampton' de feodis. In libra.

WILTS.

S.ij.16.I.605-618.

HEC SUNT FEUODA MILITUM IN COMITATU WILTES'.

Comes Saresberie.

Comes Willelmus Lungespeye tenet unum feuodum militum [3] apud Wamberge in capite de domino rege.

Johannes de Dupeford' tenet dimidium feodum militis in Depeford' de comite Willelmo Lungespeie, et ipse comes de domino rege.

Hugo Giffard' tenet apud Boitonam j. feuodum militis de Elya Giffard', et ipse Elyas de comite Saresberie, et ipse comes in capite de rege.

Henricus de Hulle tenet apud Hulle Deverel dimidium feuodum militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Johannes [1] de Wespr' et Jacobus de Bullebec tenent apud Bailleclive dimidium feodum militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.


[1] Read idem.
[2] Read Farlington.
[3] Read militis. The word unum is written over an erasure.
[4] Radulfus in margin.

WILTS. 709

S.ij.16.I.605-618 - cont.

Philippus de [1] Melew tenet ibidem j. feudum militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Robertus de Columbariis tenet apud Dumeford' quartem partem unius militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Johannes Episcopus tenet dimidium feudum militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Domina Acelina [2] tenet dimidium feudum militis in Demeford' de comite Saresberie, et ipse de domino rege.

Galfridus Colon tenet quartam partem feudi unius militis apud Ambresbur' de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Everardus Theonicus tenet apud Ambresbur' quartam partem unius militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Walterus filius Bernardi tenet dimidiam quartem [3] partem de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Patricius de Monte Forti tenet dimidium feudum militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Robertus de Gurnay tenet quartam partem feudi unius militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Johannes filius Aucheri tenet quintam partem feudi unius mihtia de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Adam de Littlecote tenet ibidem unum feudum militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus de Bingeham tenet feudum unius militis in Widecumba de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Alexander de Chiverel tenet feudum unius militis in Chiverel de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Radulfus de Angers tenet unum feudum militis in Hechelhamtona de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Robertus de Hockesham et Galfridus filius Johannis tenent feudum unius militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege in Haulton'.

Willelmus Malewein tenet quintam partem unius militis in Mertena de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Robertus de Meysi et Nicholaus de Lusteshulle tenent unum feudum et dimidium in Ettona et Meratona de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Adam le Gay tenet unum feudum apud Bluntesdune de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Rogerus Waspail et Robertus de Lucy tenent dimidium feudum militis apud Tollard' de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Margeria que fuit uxor Willelmi [4] filii Pain tenet unum feudum militis in La Pole de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Henricus de Bovile tenet feudum unius militis in Orchestona de E. Ciffard, et E. de comite, et comes de rege.

Willelmus filius Walteri tenet dimidium feudum militis apud Winterburn' de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.


[1] de repeated in error.
[2] Acelina Cotel. Excerpta e Rotulis Finium, vol. i. pp. 346, 340, 378.
[3] The abstract reads quartam only.
[4] Read Rogeri. See Close Rolls 1234-1237, pp. 502, 504.

710 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.16.I.605-618 - cont.

Reginaldus de Caune tenet unum feudum militis in Yatesbur' de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Johannes de Beintona et Adam de Castrintona tenent dimidium feudum militis in Blakelande de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus de Lukintona tenet ibidem unum feudum militis de comite Saresberie. et ipse de domino rege.

Samson de Boxa tenet ibidem unum feudum militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Petrus Burel tenet apud Langeleg' unum feudum militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Galfridus Sifrewast tenet dimidium feudum unius militis in Avene de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus Bastard' tenet unum feudum militis in Norrigge de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Abbatissa de Lacoc tenet unum feudum militis in Bissuppestre de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege,

Rogerus de Dantesya tenet. [1]

Thomas [2] de Clintona tenet j. feudum militis in Lidiard de comite de Warrewic, et ipse de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege.

Ricardus filius Aucheri tenet dimidium feodum militis apud Fisserton' de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Comes Herefordie. [3]

Rogerus de Dantesia tenet unum feudum militis in Wivelesford' de comite Herefordie, et ipse de domino rege.

Hugo de Mortemer tenet dimidium feudum militis in Cheritona de eodem comite, et ipse de domino rege.

Ricardus de Wokeseia tenet apud Hurdecot unum feudum militis de comite eodem, et ipse de rege.

Jacobus de Lya tenet dimidium feudum militis in Swaleweclive de eodem comite, et ipse de rege.

Alanus filius Warini et Robertus Breibuef tenent j. feudum militis de eodem comite, et ipse de rege.

Comes Herefordie tenet dimidium feudum militis in Edinton' de domino rege.

Ricardus de Lukintona tenet unum feudum militis ibidem de eodem comite, et ipse de rege.

Henricus de Hertham tenet ibidem unum feudum militis de eodem comite, et ipse de domino rege.

Ricardus de Middelhope tenet ibidem unum feudum militis de Radulfo de Mortemer, [4] et ipse de domino rege.

Johannes de Vernun tenet unum feudum militis in Ornigesham de eodem comite, et ipse de rege.


[1] This entry was begun in the wrong place and not cancelled.
[2] This entry and the next were added after the roll had been completed.
[3] It will be observed that some of the fees mentioned in this section are not there stated to be held of the Earl of Hereford.
[4] Radulfo de Mortemer is interlined in substitution for eodem comite cancelled.

WILTS. 711

S.ij.16.I.605-618 - cont.

Henricus de Waddona tenet unum feudum militis ibidem de eodem comite, et ipse de rege.

Henricus de Perci tenet unum feudum militis de eodem comite, et ipse de domino rege.

Reginaldus de Sumerford tenet unum feudum militis ibidem de eodem comite et ipse de rege.

Symon de Segre tenet unum feudum ibidem de W. de Clifford. et W. de rege. [1]

Prior de Bradnestoke tenet dimidium feudum militis in Segre de eodem comite, et ipse de rege.

Walterus de Eislee tenet unum feudum militis de eodem comite, et ipse de rege.

Johannes de Eistona tenet quartam partem unius mihtia in Estona de Waltero de Clifford, et ipse de rege. [2]

Willelmus de Redenedene tenet dimidium feudum militis in Bradefeld' de Radulfo de Mortemer, et ipse de rege.

Philippus de Dupeford tenet unum feudum militis apud Ambresbur' de eodem comite, et ipse de rege.

Agnes de Wokeseye tenet unum feudum militis de eodem comite. et ipse de rege.

Johannes de Cherburgh tenet in Winterburna dimidium feudum militis de comite eodem, et ipse de rege.

Petrus Burel tenet in Portona dimidium feudum militis de eodem comite, et ipse de rege.

Comes de Ereford tenet dimidium feudum militis de domino rege in Hedintona.

Robertus [3] de Stutecumba et Willelmus de Hamme tenent unum feudum militis in Cherleton' de Simon de Munford' et comitissa de Penbroc, et ipsi de comite Maresscallo, et ipse de rege.

Robertus de Bello Campo et Hugo Poer' et Ricardus Beninger' tenent unum feudum militis in Wlfhale de eodem feudo Marescalli, et ipse de domino rege.

Thomas le Sauvage tenet unum feudum militis in Burbache de eodem feudo Marescalli, et ipse de rege.

Walterus de Ripariis tenet unum feudum militis in Wottona de eodem feudo Marescalli, et ipse de rege.

Johannes Foucher' tenet quintam partem unius militis in Mideltona de eodem feudo Marescalli, et ipse de rege.

Adam de la Mare tenet unum feudum militis in La Legh de eodem feudo Marescalli, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus Cotele tenet unum feudum militis de eodem feudo Marescalli, et ipse de domino rege.

Willelmus de Durneford tenet quartam partem unius feudi militis in Boscumba de eodem feudo Marescalli, et ipse de rege.


[1] Rege is interlined in substitution for eodem comite et ipse de rege expunged and cancelled.
[2] Rege is interlined in substitution for comite et comes de rege cancelled.
[3] Here begin the fees of the Earl Marshal. From this point onwards S.ij.16 gives no titles to the different groups of fees.

712 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.16.I.605-618 - cont.

Robertus de Columbariis tenet quartem partem unius feudi militis cont ibidem de eodem feudo Marescalli, et ipse de rege.

Alanus de Bassingeburn' tenet unum feudum militis de eodem feudo Marescalli, et ipse de rege.

Johannes de Sancto Quintino tenet unum feudum militis in Wodhulle de comite Marescallo, et ipse de rege.

Radulfus de Wancy tenet unum feudum militis in Helmertona de eodem feudo Marescalli, et ipse de rege.

Johannes de Columbariis tenet dimidium feudum militis in Frockesfeld' de Matheo de Columbariis, et Matheus de Marescallo, et Marescallus de comite Insule, et comes Insule de domino rege.

Hugo de Sancto Martino tenet dimidium feudum in Hochulle de Matheo de Columbariis, et ipse de comite Insule, et ipse comes de domino rege.

Adam de Puritona tenet unum feudum militis de Matheo de Columbariis, et Matheus de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Matheus de Columbariis tenet unum feudum militis in Biencnolle de comite Marescallo, et ipse comes de comite Insule, et comes Insule de domino rege.

Ricardus Pipard tenet unum feudum militis in Clive de Matheo de Columbariis, et Matheus de comite Insule, et ipse comes de rege.

Robertus de Cornevile tenet dimidium feudum militis de Matheo de Columbariis, et ipse de comite Insule, et comes de rege.

Andreas le Blund et Beatrix Murdac tenent unum feudum militis in Witele et in Calestona de comite Insule, et ipse de rege.

Johannes Mautravers tenet unum feudum militis in Sumerford de Roberto Traigoz, et ipse de rege.

Robertus Traigoz tenet unum feudum militis in Lidiard in capite de rege.

Thomas de Dodeford tenet unum feudum militis in Cliva de dicto Roberto, et ipse de rege.

Galfridus [1] de Escudemor tenet unum feudum militis in Norton' et Opton' de dicto Roberto, et ipse de rege.

Symon de Parco tenet terciam partem unius feudi militis de dicto Godefrido, et ipse de dicto Roberto, et Robertus de rege.

Willelmus Drueys tenet dimidium feudum militis en [2] Scaudeburn de dicto Roberto, et ipse de rege de feudo de Hewyas.

Godefridus Escudemor tenet unum feudum militis in Fifhide de dicto Roberto, et ipse de rege.

Robertus Treigoz tenet unum feudum militis in Alungeton' de rege in capite.

Thomas Maudut tenet quartam partem militis apud Widehulle de dicto Roberto Traigoz, et ipse Robertus de rege.

Godefridus Escudemor' tenet ibidem quartam partem militis de dicto Roberto, et ipse de rege.


[1] Read Godefridus.
[2] Read in.

WILTS. 713

S.ij.16.I.605-618 - cont.

Galfridus [1] Huse et Thomas de Kaillewey tenent unum feudum militis in Tefunte de dicto Roberto de honore de Hewyas, et ipse de rege.

Adam Lucas tenet unum feudum militis apud Tidrintone de dicto Roberto, et ipse de rege.

Nicholaus filius Ade de Lusteshulle tenet duas partes feudi unius militis ibidem de W. de Dunstanvile, et ipse de rege.

Jacobus de Grundewlle tenet ibidem dimidium feudum militis de eodem Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus de Danteseia tenet dimidium feudum in Grundewlle de eodem Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Walterus Dunstanvile tenet unum feudum militis in Erdecote in capite de rege.

Idem Walterus tenet unum feudum militis in Sterte de domino rege.

Rogerus Dantesie tenet unum feudum militis in Smepecote de Waltero Dunstanvill, et ipse de rege.

Philippus de Cumberwelle tenet unum feudum militis in Cumton' de dicto Waltero et ipse de rege.

Fuke Basset tenet unum feudum militis in Comton' de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Walterus Dunstanvile tenet unum feudum militis apud Cumbe et Colemam de domino rege.

Philippus de Cumberwelle tenet unum feudum militis apud Cumberwlle de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Gilbertus le Engleis tenet tres partes feudi unius militis apud Welpeleye de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Walterus Dunstanvile tenet dimidium feudum in Burbache de honore Walingefordie.

Gilebertus de Muleford tenet dimidium feudum militis apud Bachamwyly de Waltero Dunstanvile, et ipse de rege.

Johannes Mautravers tenet feudum unius militis in Sumerford de Waltero Dunstanvile, et ipse de rege.

Nicholaus de Will tenet quartam partem feudi unius militis apud Wily de Waltero Dunstanvile, et ipse de rege.

Abbas de Theokesbur' tenet in Wrftona unum feudum militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Galfridus Bluet tenet feudum unius militis apud Elendune de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Abbas de Stanle tenet feudum unius militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de domino rege.

Radulfus Luvel tenet unum feudum militis apud Elecumbe [2] de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus de Wrthe tenet dimidium feudum militis in Widehulle de Hereberto filio Petri, et ipse de rege.


[1] This entry and the next were written later.
[2] Probably an error for Clive.

714 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.16.I.605-618 - cont.

Laur' de Bluntesdune tenet ibidem dimidium feudum militis de Fulcone filio Warini, et ipse de dicto Ereberto, et ipse de rege.

Idem Erebertus tenet feudum unius mfiitis in Stantona de domino rege.

Idem Erebertus tenet feudum unius militis apud Manigeford, de domino rege.

Johannes filius Galfridi tenet unum feudum apud Wideberge de feodo [1] de Chiriel et percipit scutagium de Waltero Follot pro uno feudo in eadem villa et scutagium de domina Galliena pro altero feudo ibidem, quia ista feuda tenentur de se de [2] feodo predicto de Chiriel.

Johannes filius Galfridi tenet dimidium feudum militis apud Chyriel de domino rege.

Johannes de Balun tenet apud Cheverel feudum unius militis in capite de domino rege.

Radulfus de Cheindut tenet ex parte uxoris sue apud Littletona unum feudum militis in capite de rege.

Petrus de la Mar' tenet in Stupellavintona feudum unius militis de domino rege.

Rogerus Gernun tenet feudum unius militis apud Lavinton' de Willelmo le Blund, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus Cotel tenet feudum unius militis in Dreicote de domino de Dureslee, et ipse de rege.

Godefridus de Alneto tenet unum feudum militis in Rusteshale de domino rege.

Fulco Basset tenet apud Merdene feudum unius militis de honore Leicestrie, et ipsi [3] de rege.

Willelmus Buggi tenet quartam partem feudi unius militis in Butremer' de Lucia de Ludelicche, et ipsa de rege.

Avicia de Columbariis tenet tria feuda militum in Colingeburne de abbate de Hida, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus Warin tenet dimidium feudum militis in Fifhid' de Hisabella de Mortemer, et ipsa de rege.

Johannes de Forstesbur' tenet unum feudum militis de feudo de Camhel de H. de Burgo, et ipse de rege.

Walterus de Lillebon tenet feudum unius militis in Mideltona de Johanne de Nuvile, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus Gerebert tenet feudum unius militis in Odestok de dicto Johanne, et ipse de rege.

Idem Johannes de Nevile tenet apud Harreham feudum unius militis de domino rege [4] honore de Stokecursi.

Galfridus de Mandevile tenet feudum unius militis apud Sutton' de comite de Clar', et ipse de rege.


[1] Added in another hand to supply a lacuna.
[2] Added in another hand.
[3] Sc. tenentes honoris.
[4] After rege supply de.

WILTS. 715

S.ij.16.I.605-618 - cont.

Abbas de Stanle tenet dimidium feudum unius militis apud Hugeford de dicto Galfrido de Mandevill', et ipse de E. Giffard, et ipse de rege in capite.

Jacobus de Lie tenet foudum unius militis in Laneford' de Albreda de Botreaus, et ipsa de rege.

Robertus filius Pagani tenet feudum unius militis in Sitchet de comite Saresberie, et ipse de abbatissa Sancti Edwardi, et ipsa de domino rege in capite.

Johannes le Gentil tenet dimidium feudum militis in Lillee de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Ricardus de Haseldene tenet unum feudum militis in Haseldene et Berewike de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Johannes Brudeford tenet dimidium feudum militis ibidem de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Symon Giffard' tenet quintam partem feudi militis apud Abshulle de Johanne Maudut, et ipse de Galfrido de Mandevile, et ipse de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Hamundus de Hacche tenet feudum unius militis in Hacche de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Abbatissa Sancti Edwardi tenet unum feudum militis et duas hidas de domino rege in Dunintona.

Paganus [1] de la Lee tenet dimidium feodum militis apud Goren de Ricardo de la Rokele, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus de la Rokele tenet unum feudum militis de rege in Lavintona.

Godefridus de Craucumbe tenet feudum unius militis in Corselega de rege de nouuo feufamento.

Galfridus de Mondevile tenet feudum militis in Futel [2] de domino rege in capite.

Hugo de Nipred et Willelmus de Fernhulle tenent dimidium feudum militis ibidem de dicto Galfrido, et ipse de rege.

Margeria de Balun et Willelmus filius Gilleberti tenent duas partes feudi unius militis in Swaleweclive de abbatissa Wiltonie, et ipsa de rege.

Robertus Maskerel tenet unum feudum militis in Gerardestona de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Johanna de Nevile tenet dimidium feudum militis in Knictona de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Eadem Johanna tenet dimidium feudum militis apud Obeton' de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Willelmus de Tracy tenet dimidium feodum militis apud Langeford de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Matheus Wac tenet feudum militis apud Ebbelesburne in capite de domino rege.


[1] This entry is an addition.
[2] Read Funtel.

716 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.16.I.605-618 - cont.

Rogerus de Dantesia tenet ibidem tres partes feudi militis de abbate Malmesbur', et ipse de rege.

Adam de Puriton' tenet tres partes unius feudi militis de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Galfridus Sifrewast' tenet feudum unius militis in Aven' de comite Saresberie, et ipse de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Paganus de la Le tenet dimidium feudum militis ibidem de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus Parfai tenet apud La Le octavam partem feudi militis de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Thomas de Chelleton' [1] tenet ibidem octavam partem feudi militis de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Robertus Mareward tenet viij. partem feudi mllitis in Puriton' de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Henricus le Scay tenet viij. partem feudi militis in Newinton' de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Walterus le Scot tenet viij. partem feudi militis in Credewlle de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Johannes de Cheireburg' tenet fiij. partem feudi militis in Sende de domino rege.

Erebertus filius Mathei tenet feudum unius militis in Stoke de domino rege in capite.

Patricius [2] de Chaurces tenet unum feodum militis apud Berewyk' de domino rege in capite.

Henricus de Albinaco tenet j. feodum militis de dicto Patricio, et ipse de rege apud Wicheford.

Hugo de Standene tenet j. feodum militis apud Standen' de dicto Patricio, et ipse de rege.

Michael de Cheldrenton' tenet dimidium feodum militis ibidem de dicto Patricio, et ipse de rege.

Henricus [3] Caynel tenet apud Yatton feodum unius militis de Patricio de Chaurcis, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus de Kawnvill' tenet quartam partem unius militis de Philippe Marmiun, et ipse de rege.

Johannes de Monemue et Johanna de Newill' et Albreda de Botereus tenent j. feodum militis de rege apud Langeford.

Idem Johannes, Johanna et Albreda tenent apud Dune j. feodum militis de domino rege in capite.

Eudo de Grimested' tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis de Johanne de Monemue, et ipse de rege.

Robertus Walrand tenet in Watedene unum feodum militis de Albreda de Botereus, et ipse [4] de rege.


[1] Read Cherleton'.
[2] The remainder of this return is written on the dorse of the roll in a different hand [3] Added in another hand.
[4] Read ipsa.

WILTS. 717

S.ij.16.I.605-618 - cont.

Johannes filius Ricardi de Grimested' tenet unum feodum militis ibidem de rege in capite.

Rogerus Danteseye tenet apud Winterburn' dimidium feodum militis de Avicia de Columbariis, et ipsa de rege.

Matheus Turpin tenet dimidium feodum militis de comite Wyntonie, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus Huse tenet dimidium feodum militis de Henrico Huse de Tadewyk', et ipse de rege.

Galfridus Huse tenet dimidium feodum militis de eodem Henrico, et ipse de rege.

Radulfus de Langetot tenet dimidium feodum militis de Waltero de Clifford, et ipse de rege.

Simon de Cumba et Baldewinus de Weer tenent apud Fithelton' de Huberto de Burgo, et ipse de rege de honore Caynel.

Elyas de Deverel tenet ibidem unum feodum militis de Elya Giffard, et ipse de rege.

Thomas Daniel tenet apud Orcheston' duo feoda mllitum de dicto Elya, et ipse de rege.

Godefridus Eskidemor' et Elyas de Kaylewey tenent duo feoda militum apud Tuderinton' de dicto Elya Giffard, et ipse de rege.

Jordanus la Warre tenet apud Codeford duas partes unius militis de dicto Elya, et ipse de rege.

Johannes le Mansel tenet terciam partem unius militis in Merston' de custodia domini regis de ...

Hugo Paynel tenet apud Sumerford unum feodum militis in capite de rege.

Eva de Tracy tenet apud Hanendon' feodum unius militis de rege.

Willelmus de Chaudefeld' tenet apud Eton' dimidium feodum militis de Roberto de Meysy de honore Glovernie, et ipse de rege.

Galfridus de Mandevill' tenet in Wrth' duas partes feodi unius militis de rege.

Bartholomeus Pegche tenet apud Hampton' dimidium feodum militis de rege.

Rogerus Gulafre tenet apud Bluntesdon' unum feodum militis de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de rege.

Magister Ricardus de Wyka tenet apud Berton' quartam partem feodi militis de dicta Margeria, et ipsa de rege.

Johannes de Chanflur tenet apud Serncot dimidium feodum unius militis de Roberto de Gurnay, et ipse de rege.

Thomas Mauduth tenet in Wermenistr' unum feodum militis de rege in capite.

Nicholaus Avenel tenet ibidem quintam partem feodi unius militis de Hugone de Wiwn, [1] et ipse de rege.

Robertus de Watele tenet quintam partem feodi unius militis de Henrico Huse, et ipse de Reginaldo de Moun, et ipse de rege.


[1] An unusual form of Vivon.

718 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.16.I.605-618 - cont.

Willelmus de Lundoniis, Ricardus de Crunmale et Walterus de Limisy tenent apud Sutton' feodum unius militis de Henrico Huse, et ipse de Reginaldo de Moun, et ipse Reginaldus de rege.

Ricardus de Lortiel' tenet apud Sutton' unum dimidium feodum militis de Nicholao de Mules, et ipse de rege.

Johannes de la Stane tenet apud Fisserton' et Babinton' dimidium feodum militis de Roberto de Mucegros, et ipse de rege.

Godefridus Waspail tenet in Smalebroc dimidium feodum militis de Rogero Waspail, et ipse de honore Glovernie.

Elyas de la Mare tenet in Bisopistr' quintam partem feodi unius militis de Thomas Maudut, et ipse de rege.

Rogerus de Trowe tenet in Pertewrth' duas hidas terre de Jacobo de Trowe, et ipse de Hugone de Wywn.

Hugo de Viwn tenet apud Kington' duo feoda militum de domino rege.

Henricus Caynel tenet unum feodum militis de Johanne filio Alani, et ipse de rege.

Walterus Dreu tenet apud Litleton' j. feodum militis de comite Glovernie, et ipse de rege.

Simon de Hardenewiche tenet ibidem j. feodum militis de Patricio de Chaurces, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet apud Kaln' dimidium feodum militis de rege.

Andreas de Stocke tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis de domino rege.

Johannes de Monemue, Johanna de Newill', Albreda de Botereus tenent j. feodum militis apud Codeford de rege.

Willelmus le Droys tenet in Gorton' j. feodum militis de Reginaldo de Chandas, et ipse de rege.

Johannes Mautravers et Thomas de Hinenton' tenent apud Deverel dimidium feodum militis de honore Glovernie.

Johannes de Sancto Quintino tenet apud Stanton' j. feodum militis de comite Glovernie.

Rogerus de Sifrewast tenet apud Paulisholt' j. feodum militis de Johanne filio Alani, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus Musard tenet in Bulkinton' ij. hidas de Johanne filio Alani, et ipse de rege.

Petrus de Bulkinton' tenet ibidem de Radulfo de Wyllton', et ipse Radulfus de Johanne filio Alani, et ipse de rege.

Radulfus de Paulisholt' tenet ibidem unum feodum militis de Radulfo de Wiliton', et ipse Radulfus de Johanne filio Alani, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus Waleuen tenet dimidium feodum militis de comite de Hereford', et ipse de rege.

Umfridus de Scowille tenet in Hulprinton' j. feodum militis de Alano la Zuche, et ipse Alanus de Radulfo de Mortemer', et ipse de rege.

Johannes Lovel tenet apud Elecumbe j , feodum militis de honore Leicestrie.

WILTS. 719

S.ij.16.I.605-618 - cont.

Robertus de Luscy et Rogerus Waspayl tenent dimidium feodum militis in Tollard de honore Glovernie.

Willelmus de Chaudefeld' tenet j. feodum de Vielo Engayne.

Abbas de Keynesham et Goce de Baocis tenent j. feodum militis de honore Glovernie.

Walterus de Pavely tenet in Brok j. feodum militis in capite de rege.

Galfridus de Mandevill' tenet terciam partem unius militis in Bratton' de rege.

Ricardus filius Aucheri tenet in Fiscrton' j. feodum militis de comite Arundell', et ipse de rege.

Galfridus Camerarius et N. de Haveresham tenent j. feodum militis de heredibus Willelmi Bruere, et ipsi de rege.

S.ij.16.I.681-689.

WILTESYR'.

Baronia W. de Longa Spate.

W. de Longa Spate j. feodum in Wamberge.

* * * * * * *

Galfridus Camerarius et N. de Haverhesham j , feodum de heredibus Willelmi de Briwer'.

[Endorsed:-] Hunc rotulum scripsit Ricardus clericus de scutagio concesso regi quando transfretavit in Wasconiam anno regni sui xxvj.; et est transcriptum rotuli scaccarii de compotis vicecomitum de eodem scutagio, quem quidem rotulum quando A. thesaurarius London' audivit compotos vicecomitum de eodem scutagio idem [1] Ricardus de Hereford clericus suus transcripsit.

Norh't'. In libra. Wygorn. In libro. Salop, Staff'. In libra. Nott' et Derb'. In libra. Wiltes. In libro. Berk'. In libra.

[Written reversed in another hand:-] Nichil invenilur hic.

S.ij.20. I.588-598. S.ij.23. I.599-604. (part only).

ROTULUS DE FEUDIS MILITUM IN COMITATU WILTES INQUISITIS PER SACRAMENTUM BROBORUM ET LEGALIUM HOMINUM. [2]

Feuda Comitis Saresberie. Breve.

Willelmus Bastard tenet feudum j. militis in villa de Northrig' de comite Saresberie, et dictus comes in capite de domino rege.

Edwardus de Mideldon' tenet quintam partem feudi j. militis in Middeldon, de Johanne de Strode, et Johannes de comite Saresberie, et comes in capite de domino rege.

Willelmus Malewain tenet feudum et dimidium j. militis in Echelhampton' cum j. hida terre quam tenet in villa de Merton' de comite Saresberie, et comes de domino rege in capite de baronia sua de Cettre de veteri feufamento.


[1] The words idem Ricardus cannot be read with certainty.
[2] The writ attached is similar to that addressed to the Sheriff of Hereford, which is printed below (p. 797).

720 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20. I.588-598. S.ij.23. I.599-604. (part only) - cont.

Sewale de Osevill' tenet in villa de Wanberg' quartam partem feudi j. militis de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege in capite.

Adam le Gay tenet feudum j. militis in Hangindebluntesdon' de Johanne Mautravers, et ipse de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege in capite.

Rogerus filius Pagani tenet in Depeford dimidium feudum militis et decimam partem j. feudi militis de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege in capite de veteri feufamento.

Hugo Giffard tenet dimidium feudum militis in Boiton' de Elia Giffard, et ipse de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege de baronia de Cettre de veteri feufamento.

Johannes de Munemue, Albreda de Boterels, Johanna de Nevill' tenent dimidium feudum militis in Gorton' de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege de predicta baronia de veteri feufamento.

Henricus Durling tenet in Hulledeverel dimidium feudum militis de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege de eadem baronia de veteri feufamento.

Jacobus de Bolebek tenet in Baileclive quartam feudi j. militis de Roberto de Columb', et ipse de Gilberto de Bolebek, et ipse de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege de eadem baronia de veteri feufamento.

Rogerus Syfrewast tenet in Cettre duo feuda militum preter quintam partem j. feudi militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse comes tenet [1] feudum illorum de comite Lecestrie, et comes Lecestrie de rege, et alteram feudum tenet in capite de rege de veteri feufamento.

Radulfus de Waspre tenet in villa de Bailleclive quartam partem feudi j. militis de Roberto de Waspre, et ipse de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege de novo feufamento.

Robertus de Lucy et Rogerus Waspail tenent dimidium feudum militis in Tollard de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Galfridus de Syfrewast tenet dimidium feudum militis in Aven' de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege.

Thomas Burel [2] tenet in Langeleg' ij. feuda militum de comite Saresberie, et idem comes de domino rege.

Sampson Bigod tenet in La Boxe feudum j. militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus de Cumberwill' tenet in Hertham quintam partem feudi j. militis de comite Saresberie de honore de Trobrig', et comes de rege in capite.

Bartholomeus Pecche tenet in Hertham quintam partem feudi j. militis de comite Saresberie de eodem honore, et comes de rege in capite.

Eustachius de Wrokeshal' tenet in Wrokeshal' duo feuda militum de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege de eodem honore.

Reginaldus de Sumerford tenet in Lukinton' feudum j. militis de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege de eodem honore.

Alexander de Chiverel tenet in Parva Chiverel duo feuda militum de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege de baronia de Cettre.


[1] Supply unum.
[2] Burel repeated

WILTS. 721

S.ij.20. I.588-598. S.ij.23. I.599-604. (part only) - cont.

Willelmus de Bingeham tenet in Widecumbe feudum j. militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege de honore de Trobrig'.

Adam de Luttlecote tenet Luttlecot' et terram quam habet in Hordereston' pro feudo j. militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege in capite de eodem honore.

Henricus de Whaddon' tenet in Whaddon' dimidium feudum militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege de eodem honore.

Hunfridus de Esscovill' tenet quintam partem feudi j. militis in Hulprinton' de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege de eodem honore de Trobrig'.

Prior de Ferleg' tenet in Parva Brocton' feudum j. militis de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege de eodem honore.

Henricus de Percy tenet feudum j. militis in Chaldefeld de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege de eodem honore de Trobrig'.

Willelmus Waspre tenet in Punbir' quintam partem feudi j. militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege de eodem honore.

Reginaldus de Calna tenet in Yitesbir' feudum j. militis de Waltero filio Bernardi, et ipse de comite Saresberie, et comes de domino rege in capite.

Johannes de Bamton' et Adam de Caatrinton' tenent in La Blaklande quartam partem feudi j. militis de comite Saresberie, et comes de domino rege.

Walterus de Winterburn' tenet dimidium feudum j. militis et decimam partem j. militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege de baronia de Cettre.

Willelmus filius Walteri tenet in Parva Winterburn' dimidium feudum j. militis de comite Saresberie, et comes de domino rege de eodem honore.

Alexander de Chiverel tenet in Winterburn Scireveton' duo feuda militum de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege de veteri feufamento.

Rogerus Syfrewast tenet in eadem villa dimidium feudum j. militis de comite Saresberie de novo feufamento, et comes de rege.

Rogerus de Langeford tenet in eadem villa dimidium feudum j. militis de comite Saresberie de novo feufamento, et comes de rege de veteri feufamento.

Henricus de Bovill' tenet in Orcheston' feudum j. militis de Elia Giffard, et ipse de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege de baronia de Cettre.

Adam de Luttlecote tenet in Orcheston' terciam partem feudi j. militis de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Gilbertus Giffard, Hugo Franceis et Willelmus Frankelayn tenent in Madinton' dimidium feudum j. militis de Hugone Giffard, et ipse de Elia Giffard, et Elias de comite Saresberie, et comes de domino rege.

Johannes de Langeford tenet in Langeford dimidium feudum militis et decimam partem feudi j. militis de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege.

Robertus le Savage tenet in Brudecumbe dimidium feudum j. militis et decimam partem feudi j. militis de Ricardo filio Archeri, et ipse de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege.

722 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20. I.588-598. S.ij.23. I.599-604. (part only) - cont.

Ricardus filius Acheri tenet in Fisserton' dimidium feudum j. militis et decimam partem feudi j. militis de comite Saresberie, et comes de domino rege.

Priorissa de Kinton' tenet in Sumerford quintam partem feudi j. militis de Galfrido de Syfrewast, et ipse de comite, et comes de rege de baronia de Cettre.

Amicia relicta Willelmi de Cnabbewell' et participes eius tenent in Cnabbewell' et Bradefel dimidium feudum j. militis de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege.

Nicholaus de Lusteshull' tenet in Lustehull' feudum et dimidium j. militis de dicto comite, et comes de rege de dicto honore de Trobrig'.

Robertus de Hokesham et Galfridus filius Johannis tenent in Awelton' duo feuda militum de dicto comite, et comes de rege de baronia de Cettre.

Heres Rogeri filius Pagani tenet in Pole feudum j. militis de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Idem comes Saresberie tenet in Huminton' dimidium feudum j. militis in capite de rege.

Alfredus de Nich' tenet in Seles feudum j. militis de Johanne filio Galfridi, et ipse de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege.

Ricardus de Seles tenet in Seles dimidium feudum j. militis de Avicia de Columb', et ipsa de comite Saresberie, et comes de rege.

Summa feodorum xxxviij. feoda et dimidium et tercia.

Feuda Comitis Herefordie. Breve.

Magister Rogerus de Cantilupo tenet in Hedinton' quadragesimam partem feudi j. militis de comite Herefordie, et comes de rege de honore de Trobrige.

Johannes de Ripariis tenet in eadem villa xxiiijtam partem feudi j. militis de eodem comite, et comes de domino rege de predicto honore.

Walterus de Beinton' tenet in Tiduffeshide xam partem feudi j. militis de eodem comite, et comes de rege de predicto honore.

Domus de Bradeleg' tenet in villa de Wichford dimidium feudum j. militis de eodem comite, et comes de rege.

Walterus de Asleg' tenet Asleg' pro feudo j. militis de eodem comite, et ipse comes de rege.

Reginaldus filius Willelmi tenet in Sumerford feudum j. militis de eodem comite, et comes de rege de honore de Trobrig'.

Johannes Walrand tenet decimam partem j. militis in eadem villa de eodem comite, et comes de rege de predicto honore.

Prior de Bradenestok' tenet in Secre dimidium feudum unius militis de Roberto de Scireburn', et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Jacobus de Lie tenet in Swaleweclive dimidium feudum j. militis de eodem comite, et ipse de rege de predicto honore.

Templarii tenent feudum j. militis in Chireton' de dono Radulfi de Raleg', et ipse tenet de Johanne Marescallo de novo feufamento, et ipse Johannes de eodem comite, et comes de domino rege de honore de Hereford' de veteri feufamento.

WILTS. 723

S.ij.20. I.588-598. S.ij.23. I.599-604. (part only) - cont.

Ricardus de Wokes' tenet in Erdescote quartam partem feudi militis de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Henricus de Hertham tenet in Hertham dimidium feudum j. militis de eodem comite, et comes de rege de predicto honore de Trobrig'.

Ricardus de Lukinton' tenet in Lukinton' feudum j. militis de Radulfo filio Nicholai, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege de eodem honore.

Robertus Maudut tenet in Littlecot quintam partem feudi j. militis de eodem comite, et comes de rege de predicto honore.

Walterus de Beinton' tenet quintam partem feudi j. militis in Tockeham de eodem comite, et conies de rege de predicto honore.

Prior de Farleg' tenet feudum j. militis in Thornhull' de dicto comite, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus Waluein tenet quintam partem feudi j. militis in Trolle de dicto comite, et comes de rege de predicto honore.

Henricus le Dun tenet in Bretford quartam partem feudi j. militis de Hugone de Burgat', et ipse de comite, et comes de rege de eodem honore.

Johannes de Vernun tenet in Deverel feudum j. militis de comite Herefordie, et comes de rege.

Reginaldus de Balun tenet in Burton' dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Summa ix. feoda et dimidium, tercia et xxxo.

Feuda Comitis Glovernie. In rotulo.

Godefridus Waspail tenet in Smalebrok feudum j. militis de comite Glovernie de novo feufamento, et comes de rege.

Rogerus de Trowe et Robertus Gentil tenent in Pertewurthe terciam partem feudi j. militis de Johanne de Sancto Quintino, et ipse de dicto comite, et ipse de rege de honore Glovernie.

Willelmus de Torny tenet in Uvere Werefton feudum j. militis de hered' Johannis de [1] Sore, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege de eodem honore.

Robertus de Meisy tenet in Eton' dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto comite, et comes de rege de predicto honore.

Willelmus de Chaudefeld tenet in eadem villa duas partes feudi j. militis de eodem Roberto, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege de predicto honore.

Emma Salvein tenet terciam partem feudi j. militis de dicto Roberto in eadem villa, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege de predicto honore.

Johannes de Meisy tenet in Merston' dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto comite, et comes de rege de dicto honore.

Johannes de Campo Florido tenet in Scerncote dimidium feudum j. militis de Roberto de Gurnay, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege de dicto honore.

Willelmus de Sancto Martino tenet in Cnuk dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto comite, et comes de rege.


[1] Read le.

724 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.588-598 - cont.

Johannes Mautravers et Thomas de Hineton' tenent feudum unius militis in villa de Hulle de Rogero Waspaill', et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Robertus de Lucy et Rogerus Waspail tenent in Tollard dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto comite, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus filius Elie tenet in Coreston' feudum j. militis de Rogero Waspail, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Willelmus de Sancto Laudo tenet in Witteham dimidium feudum j. militis de Gocefino de Baocis, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Johannes de Sancto Quintino tenet in Stanton' feudum j. militis de dicto comite, et ipse de rege.

Galfridus de Mandevill' tenet in Sutton' feudum j. militis de dicto comite, et ipse de rege.

Emma Plusbel tenet in Littleton' quintam partem feudi j. militis de Thoma de Duninton', et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Abbas de Keinesham tenet in Winesfeld dimidium feudum j. militis de Gocelino de Baocis, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Feuda Comitis Marescalli.

Breve, set vicecomes inde debet respondere.

Robertus de la Mar' tenet in Beveresbrok dimidium feudum j. militis de Andrea Blund', et ipse de Petro de lan [1] Mare, et Petrus de comite Marescallo, et comes de rege in capite.

Ricardus Pipard tenet in Mekindon' dimidium feudum j. militis de Matheo de Columb', et ipse de comite Marescallo, et comes Marescallus de comite Insule, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus Strug' tenet in Codeford quartam partem feudi j. militis de Rogero Bernard, et ipse de Johanne Mautravers, et Johannes de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Heres Radulfi Bluet tenet in Lacham feudum j. militis de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Willelmus Lupus tenet in Dicheriggeg dimidium feudum militis excepta j. virgata terre de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Adam de la Mar' tenet in Lega duo feuda militum prefer quintam partem feudi j. militis de Willelmo de Sancto Leodegaro, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Radulfus de Voxcot' tenet in eadem villa quintam partem feudi j. militis de Thoma de la Mar', et ipse de Willelmo de Sancto Leodegaro, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Robertus de Ponte Arche tenet in Scopewurth, feudum j. militis de Johanne Mautravers, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Radulfus de Wancy tenet in Helmerton nomine dotis feudum j. militis de Rogero [2] Bluet, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Radulfus de Barnevill' et Rogerus Bluet tenent in Godacre quintam partem feudi j. militis de dicto comite, et comes de rege.


[1] Read la.
[2] Rogero altered from Radulfo,

WILTS. 725

S.ij.20.I.588-598 - cont.

Hugo filius Roberti tenet in Bradeton' dimidium feudum i. militis de dicto comite, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus Piris [1] tenet in eadem villa quintam partem feudi j. militis de dicto comite, et ipse de rege.

Johannes de Sancto Quintino tenet in Wahull' feudum j. militis et quintam partem feudi j. militis de dicto comite, et ipse de rege.

Michael Bernard tenet in Bradeton decimam partem feudi j. militis de dicto comite, et ipse de rege.

Galfridus de Wancy tenet in Clive Wancy dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto comite, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus Cotel tenet in Atewurth' terciam partem feudi j. militis de dicto comite, et ipse de rege.

Summa x. feuda et iiij' et xxxa.

Feuda Roberti Tregoz. Breve.

Godefridus de Escudemor' tenet in Northton' duo feuda militum et in Uppton' duo feoda militum de Roberto Tregoz, et ipse de rege de honore de Ewias.

Willelmus Drois tenet in Kaninges et Alingeton' dimidium feudum militis de novo feufamento Petri de Podinton', et ipse tenet de dicto Roberto, et Robertus de rege de eodem honore.

Thomas Maudut tenet in Widihull' Wastevill' quartam partem feudi j. militis de dicto Roberto, et ipse de rege de eodem honore.

Godefridus de Escudemor tenet in eadem villa quartam partem feudi j. militis de dicto Roberto, et Robertus de rege de eodem honore.

Petrus de Mordon' tenet in Mordon' feudum j. militis de dicto Roberto, et ipse de domino rege de eodem honore.

Willelmus Whitsond tenet in eadem villa dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto Roberto, et ipse de rege de eodem honore.

Godefridus de Escudemor' tenet in Fifhide feudum j. militis de dicto Roberto, et ipse de rege de eodem honore.

Adam Lucaa tenet in Tuderinton' feudum j. militis de dicto Roberto, et ipse de rege de eodem honore.

Thomas de Dodefo.d tenet in Clive dimidium feudum j. militis et decimam partem j. militis de dicto Roberto, et ipse de rege de eodem honore.

Willelmus Follot et Radulfus de Sterkel' tenent in Cheggelewc quintam partem feudi j. militis de Henrico de Chelewurth', et ipse de dicto Roberto, et Robertus de domino Roberto [2] de predicto honore.

Galfridus Huse tenet feudum j. militis in Tefunte et Swaleweclive de dicto Roberto, et ipse de rege de eodem honore.

Johannes Mautravers tenet in Smethecot [3] feudum unius militis per custodiam heredis Walteri filii filii [4] de dicto Roberto, et ipse de rege.

Summa ix. feuda et va.


[1] Read Paris.
[2] Read rege.
[3] Possibly an error for Somerford.
[4] So in original (S.ij.20).

726 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.588-598 - cont.

Feuda Walteri de Dunstanvill. Breve.

Reginaldus de Mohun tenet in Cuinton' feudum j. militis de Waltero de Dunstanvill', et ipse de rege in capite de baronia de Cumbe.

Philippus de Cumberwill' tenet in eadem villa feudum j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege de eadem baronia.

Rogerus de Dantes' tenet in Smithecot' feudum j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege de eadem baronia.

Johannes Mautravers tenet in Sumerford dimidium feudum j. militis et xam partem feudi j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege de eadem baronia.

Abbas de Tewkesbir' tenet in Uverewerefton' feudum j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Galfridus Bluet tenet in Saltharepe feudum j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Abbas de Stanleg' tenet in Costowe quatuor partes feudi j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Radulfus Luvel tenet in Clive feudum j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de domino rege.

Willelmus de Burdevill' tenet in Chetindon' dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Nicholaus filius Ade tenet in Lusteshull' duas partes feudi j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de domino rege.

Hawis de Bluntesdon' tenet in Churibluntesdon' dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Ace Beneit tenet in eadem villa dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de domino rege.

Jacobus de Grudewell' [1] tenet in Grundewell' dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de domino rege.

Ricardus de Dantes' tenet in eadem villa dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Elias Giffard tenet in Aston' feudum j. militis de Johanne Mautravers, et Johannes de dicto Waltero, et Walterus de rege in capite.

Gilbertus de Muleford tenet in Bathamewily dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Philippus de Depeford tenet in Bathamewily quintam partem feudi j. militis de Nicholao de Wely de novo feufamento, et ipse de Alfred de Lincoln, et Alfred de dicto Waltero, et Walterus de domino rege.

Henricus de Budeston' tenet in Budeston' quartam partem feudi j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de domino rege.

Philippus de Cumberwill' tenet in Cumberwill', feudum j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de domino rege in capite.

Idem Walterus tenet in Brokton' duo feuda militum et duas hidas de domino rege in capite.

Idem Walterus de Dunstanvil' tenet feudum j. militis in Hehtredebir' in capite de domino rege.


[1] Read Grundewell'.

WILTS. 727

S.ij.20.I.588-598 - cont.

Idem Walterus tenet in Hurdecot' dimidium feudum j. militis in capite de rege, et pertinet ad boroniam de Cumbe.

Radulfus de Pinkeny tenet in Parva Scorstan' feudum j. militis de Waltero de Dunstanvill', et ipse de rege de baronia de Cumbe.

Summa xvij. feuda et dimidium tercia et xij'.

Feuda de Honore de Walingford. Breve.

Fulco Basset tenet in Brodeton' feudum j. militis de comite Ricardo, et comes de domino rege in capite de novo feufamento de honore Walingford'.

Symon de Munfort de Esseleg' tenet in Walocot' dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto comite, et ipse de rege de eodem honore.

Oliverus de Erdescot' tenet in villa de Cheselden' quartam partem feudi j. militis de Sampsone Folyot, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege de eodem honore.

Sampson Folyot tenet in Draycot' feudum et dimidium j. militis pro j. libra piperis de Henrico Crok, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege de eodem honore.

Reginaldus de Mohun de dote uxoris sue tenet in Cumton' feudum j. militis de comite Saresberie de maritagio uxoris sue, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege de eodem honore.

Rogerus de Dantes tenet in Tydovere feudum j. militis de Milone Neirnut, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege de codem honore.

Radulfus le Chanu tenet in Redburn' feudum j. militis de Henrico Crok, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege de eodem honore.

Summa vj. feoda et iiija.

S.ij.20.I.645-658.

Feuda Comitis Insule. Breve.

Matheus de Columb tenet in Bienenoli feudum j. militis de comite Marescallo, et ipse comes de comite Insule, et comes de rege.

Robertus de Cornevill' tenet in Haydon' dimidium feudum unius militis de Matheo de Columb', et Matheus de comite Marescallo, et ipse de comite Insule, et comes de rege.

Matheus de Columbar' tenet in Luttleton' dimidium feudum j. militis de comite Marescallo, et ipse de comite Insule, et comes de rege in capite.

Andreas le Blund et Ricardus de la Dene tenent dimidium feudum j. militis in Calston' de Johanne Maudut, et ipse tenet illud dimidium feudum cum hamelletto de Wihtleg' pro j. feudo militis integro, et comes in capite de domino rege.

Prior de Sancto Dionisio in Bereford quintam partem feudi j. militis de Rogero de Dantes', et ipse de Avicia [1] de Columb', et ipsa de comite Glovernie, [2] et comes de domino rege.

Ricardus Pipard tenet in Cliva Pipard feudum j. militis et dimidii de Matheo de Columbariis, et ipse de comite Marescallo, et comes Marescallus de comite Insule, et comes Insule de rege.

Summa iiij. feuda et va.


[1] Avicia corrected from Matheo.
[2] Glovernie is written over an erasure.

728 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.645-658 - cont.

Feuda Patricii de Chawurth'. Breve.

Henricus de Albiniaco tenet in Wichford' dimidium feudum j. militis de Radulfo de Sancto Amando, et ipse de Patricio de Chawurth', et ipse de rege in capite.

Walterus Pendok tenet in Chegelawe dimidium feudum j. militis de Hugone de Stenden', et Hugo de dicto Patricio, et Patricius de rege.

Simon de Chiverel, Petrus Achard et Walterus de Tycheburn' tenent in Herdenewiz feudum j. militis de dicto Patricio, et ipse de rege de baronia de Kinemerford'.

Henricus Kaignel tenet in Eston' feudum j. militis de dicto Patricio, et ipse de rege de eadem baronia.

Summa iij. feuda.

Feuda Henrici Husee. In rotulo.

Hubertus Huse tenet in Stapellord feudum j. militis de Henrico Huse, et ipse de rege in capite.

Rogerus de Kalemundesden' tenet in Berleg' quintam partem feudi j. militis de dicto Henrico, et ipse de domino rege.

Willelmus Bussel tenet in Whiteclive quintam partem feudi j. militis de dicto Henrico, et ipse de rege.

Galfridus Huse tenet in Hull' decimam partem feudi j. militis de dicto Henrico, et ipse de rege.

Feuda Reginaldi de Mohun. Breve.

Walterus de Limesye tenet in Parva Sutton' feudum j. militis de Henrico Huse, et ipse de Reginaldo de Mohun; et ipse de rege de honore de Dunaterr'.

Robertus de Whateleg' tenet in Parva Coraleg' quintam partem feudi j. militis de Henrico Huse, et ipse de dicto Reginaldo, et Reginaldus de rege de eodem honore.

Feuda Elie Giffard. In rotulo.

Jordanus la Ware tenet in Codeford et Orcheaton' duas partes feudi j. militis de Elia Giffard, et ipse de rege in capite.

Thomas Daniel tenet in Orcheston' duo feuda militum de Elya Giffard, et ipse de rege in capite.

Eustachius de Hull' tenet quintam partem feudi j. militis in Tydulleshid' de Elia de Hull', et ipse de Elia Giffard, et ipse de rege in capite.

Elias de Hull' tenet in Hulledeverel feudum j. militis prefer quintam partem feudi j. militis de Elia Giffard, et ipse de rege in capite.

Nicholaus Burpein et Johannes Dam' et Clemens de Ugeford tenent in Ugeford' dimidium feudum j. militis de Galfrido de Mandevill', et ipse de Elia Giffard, et Elias de rege.

Feuda Herberti Filli Mathei. Breve.

Herbertus filius Mathei tenet in Stok et in Yitesbir' feudum j. militis de domino rege in capite.

WILTS. 729

S.ij.20.I.645-658 - cont.

Henricus de Hertham tenet in Yitesbir decimam partem feudi j. militis de dicto Herberto, et ipse de rege.

Reginaldus de Sumerford' tenet in eadem villa quartam partem dimidii feudi j. militis de dicto Herberto, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus de Bamton' tenet in eadem villa sextam partem dimidii feudi j. militis de dicto Herberto, et ipse de domino rege.

Robertus de Aldrinton' tenet in eadem villa quintam partem feudi j. militis de dicto Herberto, et ipse de domino rege.

Summa feodum et dimidium quinta et lxa.

Feuda Herberti Filii Petri. In rotulo.

Prior de Bradenestok tenet in Setre dimidium feudum j. militis de Bartholomeo Kokerel, et ipse de Herberto filio Petri, et Herbertus de rege in capite.

Idem Herbertus tenet in Stanton' dimidium feudum j. militis in capite de rege.

Willelmus de Wurthe tenet in Widihull' dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto Herberto, et ipse de rege.

Idem Herbertus tenet in Tockeham feudum j. militis in capite de rege quod ei descendebat de Waltero Pinknay per voluntatem domini regis.

Hugo de Mortuo Mari tenet in villa de Chiriton' xxam partem feudi j. militis de novo feufamento de dicto Herberto, et ipse de rege de veteri feufamento.

Feuda Fulconis Filii Warini. In rotulo.

Fulco filius Warini tenet in Stanton' dimidium feudum j. militis in capite de rege.

Laurentius de Bureton' tenet in Buribluntesdon' feudum j. militis de dicto Fulcone, et ipse de rege in capite.

Eva de Bassingeburn' tenet in Westbur' dimidium feudum j. militis de Eva de Tracy, et ipsa de dicto Fulcone, et Fulco de rege in capite.

Feuda Radulfi de Mortuo Mari.

Ricardus de Pertewurth' tenet in Pertewurth' quintam partem feudi j. militis de Briano de Branton', et ipse de Radulfo de Mortuo Mari, et ipse de rege.

Thomas de Cavereswurthe tenet in Pertewurth' quintam partem feudi j. militis de Radulfo de Mortimer, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus de Raddon' tenet in Bradefeld quartem partem feudi j. militis de eodem Radulfo, et ipse de rege.

Hugo de Crofton' tenet in eadem villa quartam partem feudi j. militis de dicto Radulfo, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus de Middelhap tenet in Surinden' feudum j. militis de dicto Radulfo, et ipse de rege.

Johannes de Eston' tenet in Audrinton' terciam partem feudi j. militis de Briano de Branton', et Brianua de dicto Radulfo, et ipse de domino rege.

730 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.645-658 - cont.

Thomas de Tokeham tenet in Tackeham per wardam de Wygemore dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto Briano, et ipse de Radulfo, et Radulfus de rege.

Hunfridus de Escevill' tenet in Hulprinton' feudum j. militis de Alano de la Cuche, et ipse de dicto Radulfo, et Radulfus de rege in capite.

Feuda Walteri de Clifford. In rotulo.

Symon de Secre tenet in Secre feudum j. militis de Waltero de Clifford, et ipse in capite de rege.

Johannes de Eston' tenet in Eston' quatuor partes feudi j. militis de dicto Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Feuda Johannis Filii Galfridi. In rotulo.

Johannes filius Galfridi tenet in Chiriel feudum j. militis in capite de rege de novo feufamento.

Henricus de Bissopeston', Walterus Folyot, Galiana de Turvil', Egidius de Erie, et Galfridus de Langeleg' tenent in Wudeberge duo feuda militum de dicto Johanne, et ipse de rege.

Feuda Comitis Lecestrie. Breve.

Johannes Luvel tenet in Elecumbe dimidium feudum j. militis de comite Lecestrie, et comes de rege.

Rogerus Syfrewast tenet in Cettre feudum j. militis preter decimam partem feudi j. militis de dicto comite, et ipse de domino rege.

Fulco Basset tenet in Mereden feudum j. militis de honore comitis de Lecestr', et ipse de rege.

Feuda Honoris de Kington'. In rotulo.

Johannes de Gardin' tenet in Stratton' feodum j. militis de Willelmo de Brause, et solvit j. marcam ad honorem de Kington' per annum.

Rogerus de la Folye tenet in eadem villa dimidium feudum j. militis de eodem honore, et solvit per annum dimidiam marcam ad dictum honorem.

Thomas de Feonay tenet in eadem villa dimidium feudum j. militis de eodem honore, et solvit per annum dimidiam marcam ad dictum honorem.

Philippus le Bret tenet in eadem villa dimidium feudum j. militis de eodem honore, et solvit per annum dimidiam marcam ad dictum honorem.

Feuda Johannis Filii Alani. In rotulo.

Nicholaus Burdon' tenet in Pawelesholt' feudum j. militis de Johanne filio Alani, et ipse de rege in capite de baronia de Cuvel.

Radulfus de Pawelesholt' tenet in eadem villa feudum j. militis de Radulfo de Wiliton', et ipse de rege de eadem baronia.

Petrus de Bulkinton' tenet in Bulkinton' dimidium feudum j. militis de Willelmo de Lucy, et ipse de Johanne filio Alani, et ipse de rege de eadem baronia.

WILTS. 731

S.ij.20.I.645-658 - cont.

Willelmus Musard' tenet quartam partem dimidii feudi j. militis eadem villa de Johanne filio Alani, et ipse de rege de eadem baronia.

Idem Johannes filius Alani tenet in Bulkinton' quintam partem feudi j. militis in capite de rege.

Feuda Honoris de Stradie. In rotulo.

Galfridus Bluet tenet in Weckelescot' dimidium feodum j. militis de Fulcone Basset, et ipse de honore de Stradie, et custos honoris de domino rege.

Amfelisa Pilk tenet in eadem villa dimidium feudum j. militis de dicto Fulcone, et ipse de dicto honore, et custos honoris de domino rege.

Feuda de Honore de Duvere. In rotulo.

Willelmus Pipard tenet in Northecot' tres partes feudi j. militis de Johanne Barlet, et ipse de Gilberto de Haia, et Gilbertus de honore de Duvere, et custos honoris de domino rege.

Johannes Barlet tenet quartam partem feudi unius militis in eadem villa de Fulcone Basset, et ipse de Gilberto de Haia, et ipse de dicto honore, et custos honoris de rege.

Feuda Johannis de Balon'. In rotulo.

Walterus de Lymesy, Rec' de Crumhal' et Willelmus de Lond tenent terciam partem quinte partis dimidii feudi j. militis in Magna Sutton' de Johanne de Balon', et ipse de rege de honore de Mortelay. [1]

Walterus de Godervil' tenet in Magna Chiverel' feudum j. militis de Johanne de Balon', et ipse de rege de dicto honore.

Idem Johannes de Balon tenet in Magna Chiverel' feudum j. militis in capite de rege de eodem honore.

Johannes de la Stan' tenet in Babinton' et Fisserton' dimidium feudum j. militis de Roberto de Muchegros in capite de rege de honore de Curi Malet. Breve.

Feuda Johannis de Nevill'. In rotulo.

Willelmus Gireberd tenet in Oddestok feudum j. militis de Johanne de Nevill', et ipse de rege in capite de honore de Stok Curcy.

Galfridus Huse tenet in Harnham sextam partem feudi j. militis de Henrico Huse, et ipse de Johanne de Nevill', et ipse de rege de dicto honore.

Feuda Comitis Wintonie. Breve.

Robertus de Quency tenet Winterburn' Stok de comite Wintonie, et comes de rege pro xxa parte feudi j. militis.

Nicholaus de Rolveston' tenet in Rolveston' feudum j. militis de Gilberto de Muleford' et Waltero de Killingeholm, et ipsi de Ernisio de Nevill', et ipse de comite, et comes de rege.


[1] Read Marcle.

732 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.645-658 - cont.

Matheus Turpin tenet in Tuderinton' dimidium feudum j. militis de comite Wintonie, et comes de domino rege.

Summa feudum et dimidium et xxa.

Paganus de Brenkewurth tenet in Gare dimidium feudum j. militis de Andrea de Blund et Elena uxore sua, et ipsi de Roberto de la Mar' et Ricardo de la Rokel', et ipsi in capite de domino rege. La Rokele. Breve.

Ricardus de la Rokel' tenet in villa de Stupellavinton' feudum j. militis in capite de rege. Breve.

Petrus de la Mare tenet in eadem villa feudum j. militis in capite de domino rege. In rotulo.

Feuda Abbatia Glastonie. In rotulo.

Petrus de la Mare tenet in Parva Domerham feudum j. militis de Johanne de Sancto Quintino, et ipse de Alvredo de Nich', et ipse de abbate Glastonie, et abbas de rege.

Radulfus de Baskervill' tenet in Tudeputte dimidium feudum j. militis de Nicholao filio Martini, et ipse de dicto abbate, et abbas de rege.

Elias de la Hide tenet in villa de Domerham sextam partem feudi j. militis de Roberto de Gumay, et ipse de abbate, et abbas de rege.

Petrus de Wateleg' tenet in villa de Muneketon' quartam partem feudi j. militis de Roberto de Wateleg', et ipse de abbate, et abbas de rege.

Galfridus Husee tenet in villa de Deverel Lungpunt quintam partem feudi j. militis de Roberto de Wateleg', et ipse de abbate, et abbas de rege.

Johannes de Abbedeston' tenet quatuor partes feudi j. militis de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege in Netelton', Gnitelington' et Kinkton'.

Hugo de Dol' tenet dimidium feudum j. militis de eodem abbate, et ipse de rege in Netelton', Grutefington' et Kinkton'.

Adam de Clopcot' et Rois tenent de Jordano filio Urci j. feudum militis de dicto abbate, et abbas de rege in Netelton', Grutefington' et Kinkton'.

Willelmus de Haiwude tenet sextam partem feudi unius militis de dicto abbate, et abbas de rege in Netelton', Grutefington' et Kinkton'.

Galfridus Folyot tenet in Badebir' dimidium feudum militis de predicto abbate et ipse de rege.

Feuda Abbatis de Malmesbir. In rotulo. [1]

Galfridus de Syfrewast tenet in Aven' dimidium feudum unius militis de abbate de Malmesbir', et ipse de rege.

Rogerus de Dantes' tenet in Dantes' tres partes feudi j. militis de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.


[1] Possibly this note does not apply to the first entry in the fees.

WILTS. 733

S.ij.20.I.645-658 - cont.

Paganus de la Leg' et Frari de Dichfford' tenent in Brunkwurth et Neuton' quartem partem feudi j. militis de Ada de Puriton', et ipse de abbate, et abbas de rege.

Beatrix Muredag tenet in Sumerford tertiam partem feudi j. militis de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Johannes Mautravers tenet in Brokenesbereg' quartam partem feudi j. nulitia de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus filius Willelmi tenet octavam partem feudi j. militis in Leg' de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus de Hanckinton' tenet in eadem villa quartam partem feudi j. militis de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Milo de Morle et Radulfus de Hurle tenent in Morle quartem partem feudi j. militis de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Walterus le Escot et Radulfus filius Hugonis, et Rogerus Capellanus et Willelmus de Bradefel, tenent in Crudewill' quartam partem feudi j. militis de dicto abbate, et ipse de domino rege.

Henricus Husee tenet [1] in Neuton' decimam partem feudi j. militis de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus le Vain tenet in Brokeneberg' decimam partem feudi j. militis de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus le Bret, Henricus Scay, Ricardus Wader et Wibertus de Cherleton' tenent quartam partem feudi j. militis in Neuton' de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Thomas de Cherleton' tenet in Cherleton' sextem decimam partem feudi j. militis de dicto abbate, et ipse de rege.

Feuda Abbatisse de Wilton'. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Sancto Martino tenet in Uppeton', Weredore et Cnihteton' feudum j. militis de abbatissa de Wilton' et ipsa de rege de veteri feufamento.

Robertus Maskerel et participes sui tenent in villa de Chelk feudum j. militis de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege de veteri feufamento.

Willelmus Gilberti et Marg' Balun tenent in Swaleweclive duas partes feudi j. militis de Roberto de Mandevill', et ipse de rege.

Heredes Walteri de Kalston' tenent in Stanton', Childhampton' et Chelk terciam partem feudi j. militis de abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Willelmus de Tracy tenet in Langeford' dimidium feudum j. militis de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Willelmus Branche tenet in Ore dimidium feudum j. militis de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Godefridus Escudemor et Henricus de Campoflorido tenent in Chelk et Hulkot' duas partes dimidii feudi j. militis de abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Juliana Corbet tenet sextam partem dimidii feudi j. militis in Notherhampton' de Roberto de Boaco, et ipse de abbatissa, et abbatissa de rege.


[1] tenet repeated.

734 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.645-658 - cont.

Feuda Abbatisse de Sancto Edwardo. In rotulo.

Robertus filius Pagani tenet in Ciklet feudum j. militis de comite Saresberie, et comes de abbatissa de Sancto Edwardo, et ipsa de rege.

Johannes Gentil tenet in Lindleg' dimidium feudum j. militis de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Hamon de Hache tenet in Esthache feudum j. militis de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Hugo de Nipred tenet in Nipred terciam partem feudi j. militis de herede Roberti Maudut, et ipse de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Willelmus de Fornhull' tenet sextam partem feudi j. militis in Fernhall' de Isabella de Bretton', et ipsa de herede Roberti Maudut, et ipse de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de domino rege.

Symom Giffard tenet in villa de Apshull' quintam partem feudi j. militis de heredibus Roberti Maudut, et ipsi de Galfrido de Mandevill', et ipse de dicta abbatissa, et abbatissa de domino rege in capite.

Walterus de Aklee tenet in Stafford quintam partem feudi j. militis de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Godefridus de Escudemor tenet in Billeg' decimam partem feudi j. militis de Galfrido de Billeg', et ipse de dicta abbatissa, et abbatissa de rege.

Ricardus de Haselden' tenet in Eston' et in Haselden' dimidium feudum j. militis, et xam partem j. militis de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Johannes de Brudesert tenet in Dudeleg' quintam partem feudi militis de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Thomas de Atewrthe tenet in Atewrth' quartam partem feudi militis de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Matheus de Doninton', Robertus le Frank et Galfridus Maudut tenent terciam partem feudi j. militis in Duninton' de Johanne Maudut, et ipse de dicta abbatissa. et abbatissa de rege.

Ricardus Cotel tenet in Draicot' feudum j. militis de Johanne de Berkle, et ipse de domino rege in capite. In rotulo.

Andreas de Stokke tenet in Stok dimidium feudum j. militis in capite de domino rege. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet in Kalston' dimidium feudum j. militis in capite de rege. Breve.

Robertus Umedeu tenet in Tidulfeshid' quintam partem feudi j. militis de Herberto de Stok, et ipse de abbate de Hid', et ipse de rege. Abbas de Hid' respondet per se de feodis suis per breve regis.

Feuda Johannis de Munemue. In rotulo.

Johannes de Munemue, Albreda de Boterell' et Johanna de Nevill tenent in Langeford feudum j. militis in capite de rege.

Johannes de Campeny tenet in eadem villa decimam partem j. militis de Johanne de Munemue, et ipse de rege.

WILTS. 736

S.ij.20.I.645-658 - cont.

Warinus de Wychford tenet in Wychford decimam partem feudi j. militis de Johanne de Camp', et ipse de Johanne de Munemy, et ipse de rege.

Hospitale Sancti Johannis tenet in Anestig' feudum j. militis de Roberto de Stainton', et ipse de Albreda de Boterels. et ipsa de rege.

Heredes Nicholai Girard' tenent in Bereford' decimam partem feudi j. militis de Radulfo de Battenham, et ipse de Johanne de Monemue et ipse de rege.

Johannes de Munemue, Albreda de Botereli' et Johanna de Nevill' tenent in Codeford feudum j. militis in capite de rege.

Ricardus de Camvil' tenet in Dichampton' quartam partem feudi j. militis de Philippo Marmion, et ipse de rege.

Robertus [1] de Blakeford tenet in Bimerton' et Quidhampton tertiam partem feudi j. militis de Galfrido Camerario, et ipse de Ingeram de Preua et ipse de rege. In rotulo.

Johannes de Gremestede tenet in dictis villis quintam partem feudi j. militis de Galfrido Camerario, et ipse de dicto Ingeramo, et Ingeramus de rege. In rotulo.

Galfridus Camerarius et Nicholaus de Haveresham tenent feudum j. militis in Cumpton' de heredibus Willelmi Bruer', et ipsi de rege. In rotulo.

Hugo de Cormaill', Petrus de Brudecumbe et Agatha tenent quintam partem feudi j. militis in Bereford de dicto Galfrido, et Galfridus de dicto Ingeramo, et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo.

Johannes de Cantilupo, heres Roberti Maudut et heres Willelmi de Fontibus tenent feudum unius militis in Funtel de Galfrido de Mandevil', et ipse de rege. Breve.

Thomas Maudut tenet feudum j. militis in Werministre el in Buriton' in capite de rege de novo feufamento. In rotulo.

Godefridus de Craucumb' tenet feudum j. militis in Corsleye in capite de rege de novo feoffamento. In rotulo.

Ricardus del Ortiay tenet dimidium feudum j. militis in Magna Sutton' de Nicholao de Molis, et ipse de rege de honore Jacobi de Novo Mercato. Breve.

Ricardus Blundel tenet in Echelhampton' dimidium feudum j. militis de Radulfo de Wiliton', et ipse de Henrico le Ver, et Henricus de rege. In rotulo.

Robertus de Ponte Arche tenet Swndon' pro decima parte feudi militis in capite de domino rege. In rotulo.

Walterus Dandely tenet in Werefton' dimidium feudum j. militis de episcopatu Wintonie, et ipse de rege. Episcopatus Wintonie.

Hawysia de London' tenet Hanedon' pro dimidio feudo j. militis in capite de domino rege. In rotulo.


[1] Over Robertus de Blakeford is added Heredes W. Briwerr', apparently referring to the next four entries.

736 AD. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.645-658 - cont.

Robertus de Turvill' tenet Hamnton' pro dimidio feudo j. militis in capite de domino rege. In rotulo.

Galfridus de Mandevill' tenet in Wurthe dimidium feudum j. militis in capite de domino rege. In rotulo.

Matheus Wak tenet in Eblesburn' feudum j. militis in Eblesburn'in capite de rege. In rotulo.

Rogerus Gulafre tenet in Buribluntesdon' feudum j. militis de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de honore de Curcy, et honor de rege. In rotulo.

Thomas de Klinton' tenet in Lidierd' feudum j. militis de comite de Warwik. In rotulo. Honor de comite Warw'.

Walterus de Radehurst' tenet in Radenhurst' liijam partem feudi j. militis de Hugone Tunere, et ipse de Ricardo Cotel, et ipse de episcopo Bathoniensi, et ipse de rege. Episcopatus Bathonie.

Walterus de Godervill' tenet in Chippeham quartam partem feudi j. militis in capite de rege de novo feufamento. In rotulo.

Walterus de Pavely tenet in eadem vllla terciam partem feudi j. militis in capite de rege de novo feufamento. In rotulo.

Idem Walterus tenet [1] in Westbir' dimidium feudum j. militis in capite de rege de novo feufamento. In rotulo.

Idem Walterus tenet in eadem villa dimidium feudum j. militis de Willelmo Plugenet, et Willelmus de rege de novo feufamento. In rotulo.

Philippus Marmion tenet in eadem villa terciam partem feudi j. militis de Eva de Bassingeburn' et [2] Waltero de Pavil', et ipse Walterus de rege de novo feufamento. In rotulo.

Milo de Kaignes tenet in Zitton' dimidium feudum j. militis de Willelmo de Kignes de honore de Sumerford, et ipse de rege. Honor de Kaagn'. In rotulo.

Eva de Bassingeburn' tenet in Lia xvjam partem feudi j. militis de Eva de Tracy, et ipsa de Fulcone filio Warini, et Fulco de heredibus Willelmi de Lamfelay, et heredes de rege. In rotulo. Lanval'.

Robertus de Maneriis tenet in Lia xvjam partem feudi j. militis de herede Willelmi de Lanfelay, et ipse de rege. In rotulo. Lanval'.

Galfridus de Mandevill' tenet in Bratton' tertiam partem feudi j. militis de rege et dat per annum xx.a. ad custodiam castri Divisarum. In rotulo.

Willelmus et Willelmus Quintin' tenent in Clive feudum j. militis de herede de Muleples, et ipse de episcopo Saresberiensi, et episcopus de rege. Episcopus Saresberiensis.

Willelmus de Chaudefeld tenet in Chaudefeld feudum j. militis de Henrico Angaign', et ipse de rege.

Johanna de Sancto Martino tenet Chadewich pro feudo j. militis de comite Saresberie, et comes de episcopo Saresberiensi, et episcopus de rege. Episcopus Saresberiensis.

Michael de Sturton' tenet Sturton' pro feudo j. militis de Ricardo Luvell', et Ricardus de domino rege. Lanval'. [3] In rotulo.

Rogerus Gernun tenet feudum j. militis in Lavinton' de Willelmo Blundo, et ipse Willelmus de rege in capite. Breve.


[1] tenet repeated.
[2] After et supply ipsa de.
[3] Read Luvel.

WILTS. 737

S.ij.20.I.662-681.

ROTULUS DE TERRIS ET VILLIS IN COMITATU WILTES QUE NON TENENTUR PER SERVICIUM MILITARE INQUISITIS PER SACRAMENTUM PROBORUM ET LEGALIUM HOMINUM.

Margeria de Ripariis tenet villam de Crekelade de cameraria domini regis ad scaccarium.

Eadem Margeria tenet villam de Sevenhampton' cum pertinenciis de domino rege per predictum servicium.

Abbatissa de Sancto Edward tenet manerium de Bradeford, Atewurthe, Wrokeshal', Holte, Trulle, Winesleg', Wlfleg' et Ludinton' de rege in pura et perpetua elemosina de veteri feufamento.

Eadem abbatissa tenet villam de Duninton' in capite de domino rege, et pertinet ad baroniara suam de veteri feufamento.

Eadem abbatissa tenet manerium de Tyssebir' in capite de domino rege, et pertinet ad dictam baroniam de veteri feufamento.

Abbatissa de Lacok tenet villam de Bissupestreo de comite Saresberie in pura elemosina de novo feufamento, et ipse de rege de honore de Trobrige.

Eadem abbatissa tenet manerium de Lacok de comite Saresberie in pura elemosina de novo feufamento, et ipse de rege de honore de Trobrige.

Nicholaus Avenel tenet in villa de Werministre unam hidam terre de Hugone de Vivon per servicium claudendi j. perticatam de parco dicti Hugonis apud Curi Malet.

Robertus canonicus Saresberie tenet duas hidas terre in villa de Werministre in libera elemosina, et est quedam prebenda ecclesie Saresberie.

Prior de Lanton' tenet omnes libere tenentes et villanos de Chireton' de dono Luce de Grucy, et ipse de comite Herfordie de novo feufamento pro uno spervario soro, et ipse comes de domino rege in capite de veteri feufamento.

Abbas de Grastan' tenet villam de Kunek in puram elemosinam de comite de Mort' et ipse de rege in capite de veteri feufamento.

Abbatissa Wintonie tenet villam de Urichesfunte et villam le Kaninges in pura elemosina de domino rege de veteri feufamento.

Prior de Bradenestok tenet j. hidam terre in Echelhampton' in puram elemosinam de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege de veteri feufamento.

Prior Sancti Suthuni Wintonie tenet villam de Peteny in pura elemosina de domino rege de veteri feuffamento.

Idem prior tenet villam de Worefton' et villam de Bissopeston' in capite de domino rege et villam de Stokton' et villam de Awelton' Prioris et villam de Hineton' et villam de Enetford' in capite de domino rege de veteri feufamento, set nescitur per quos [1] servicium.

Hugo filius Johannis tenet villam de Chilton' in socagio de Matheo de Columbariis, et ipse de comite Marescallo, et ipse de rege de veteri feufamento.

Abbas de Stanleg' tenet Mighal' de dono anticessorum domini regis.


[1] Read quod.

738 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.662-681 - cont.

Stephanus Lungespee tenet Wanberg' de dono Willelmi Lungespee de novo feufamento, et ipse de rege in capite, set nescitur per quod servicium.

Abbas Glastonie tenet villam de Baddebir' in pura et perpetua elemosina de dono regis Alfredi.

Abbatissa de Marceney Burgondie tenet villam de Brome in pura elemosina de domino comite Rotoro primi, [1] et ipse tenuit de rege de veteri feufamento.

Bartholomeus de Husa tenet villam de Englesham in capite de rege per servicium mutandi quoddam ostorium de veteri feufamento.

Prior de Ferleg' tenet c. solldatas terre in Merston' in pura elemosina in capite de rege.

Walerandus de Bluntesdon' tenet in Stratton' vj. hidas terre, nullum faciena inde servicium, nec scitur de quo tenet.

Philippus Avenel tenet iiij. libratas terre in Swindon' de abbatissa Wintonie, et ipsa de rege in capite [2] in pura elemosina de veteri feuffamento.

Comes Ricardus tenet lx. solidatas terre in villa de Stratton' pertinentes ad manerium de Cosham in capite de rege, set nescitur per quod servicium.

Idem comes tenet villam de Cossham in capite de rege, set nescitur per quod servicium.

Idem comes tenet villam de Mere cum pertinenciis in capite de domino rege, et Wilton' similiter de novo feufamento, set nescitur per quod servicium.

Abbas de Cyrecestre tenet villam de Latton' in capite de domino rege in pura et perpetua elemosina de veteri feufamento.

Wenteliana tenet villam de Pulton' per seriantiam in capite de rege de honore de Mungumery.

Abbas de Teukesbir' tenet villam de Eston' in pura elemosina de honore Glovernie de dono Roberti filii Evermund', et ipse ten' de rege.

Hugo Paignel tenet villam de Sumerford de Willelmo de Kaignes, et Willelmus in capite de rege, set nescitur per quod servicium neuter eorum tenet.

Johannes de Vernun tenet villam de Horningesham in socagio de comite Herefordie per servicium j. spervarii per annum, et ipse comes de rege in capite.

Willelmus Strug tenet j. hidam terre in villa de Codeford in socagio de Elia Giffard, et ipse de rege.

Henricus de Loueston' tenet Parvam Horningesham in socagio de priore de Bradenstoc, et ipse de Roberto Tregoz, et Robertus de rege in capite de veteri feufamento.

Johannes Owain tenet septem hidas terre in villa de Ymemer in socagio de Johanne le Rus, et ipse de abbatissa de Rumes', et ipsa de rege in capite de veteri feufamento in pura elemosina.

Johannes le Rus tenet duas carucatas terre in villa de Ymmemere in capite de rege per seriantiam quod sit camerarius domini regis de veteri feufamento.


[1] Read primo.
[2] In capite repeated.

WILTS. 739

S.ij.20.I.662-681 - cont.

Gaudinus de Albo Monasterio tenet duas hidas terre in Hestredebir' per seriantiam de comite Glovernie, ut custodias [1] ei duos falcones, et comes in capite de rege.

Nicholaus de Wily tenet in socagio j. hidam terre in villa de W. de Alvredo de Linc', et ipse de Waltero de Dunstanvill', et Walterus de domino rege in capite de veteri feufamento.

Symon de Ymmemere tenet j. hidam in villa de Ymmemere ad veterem firmam per ij.m. de priore de Branestok', et ipse de Thoma de Tokham, et Thomas de honore de Wigemore, et Wigemore de rege in capite de veteri feufamento.

Abbas de Becco tenet villam de Brihtricheston' in pura elemosina de dono Matillidis Imperatricis.

Rois de Verdun tenet villam de Stokes in socagio de abbatissa de Wilton', et abbatissa de domino rege in capite de veteri feufamento.

Abbatissa de Wilton' tenet villam de Chelk in capite de domino rege, et est capitale manerium baronie sue de veteri feufamento.

Eadem abbatissa tenet villam de Berewik, villam de Semeleg, villam de Cnoel, villam de Childmerk, villam de Wily, villam de Stanton', villam de Norpneuton', villam de Suthneulon', villam de Fugeleston', villam de Noperhapton', villam de Babestok cum pertinenciis suis in capite de domino rege de veteri feufamento.

Berenger de Alviteston' tenet Alviteston' in socagio de dicta abbatissa, et abbatissa de domino rege de veteri feufamento.

Galfridus de Brudemere tenet Brudemere de dicta abbatissa in socagio, et abbatissa de rege in capite de veteri feufamento.

Galfridus de Trowe et Alexander de Trowe tenent villam de Trowe de dicta abbatissa per seriantiam, et ipsa de rege de veteri feufamento.

Ricardus filius Ricardi tenet Uppeton' in socagio de dicta abbatissa, et ipsa de rege.

Galfridus le Chamberlang tenet villam de Norpinton' per seriantiam de domino rege.

Walterus de Godarvill' tenet j. virgatam terre in Chippeham in capite de domino rege, reddendo ei quemdam arcum de auburn de novo feufamento.

Jacobus Husee tenet in Chippeham vij. libratas terre de commissione domini regis.

Heres Gregorii de la Tur' tenet in Chippeham iij. iiidas terre in capite de rege, solvendo ei per annum j. spervarium sorum, et est in custodia Hugonis de la Tur'.

Emma la Warr' tenet de Waltero de Godarvill' c. solidatas terre in Chippeham pro quodam ostorio ei reddendo vel v. solidis, et ipse tenet de rege.

Rogerus de Addeleg' tenet villam de Kadenham pro xl.s. de honore de Warwyk', et ipse de domino rege.

Monachi de Stanleg' tenent in Stanleg' xl. solidatas terre de dono domini regis in pura elemosina; et tenent in Lokeswell' de dono domini regis xx. solidatas terre in pura elemosina.


[1] So in S.ij.20.

740 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.662-681 - cont.

Rogerus de Berneval' tenet in Budeston' x. libratas terre de dono domini regis in capite.

Moniales de Marteny [1] tenent villam de Slaterford in pura elemosina de domino rege de veteri feufamento.

Hugo de Vivon' tenet villam de Westkineton' de dono domini regis, set nescitur per quod servicium tenet.

Matheus Bezil tenet manerium de Scorstan' de dono domini regis, set nescitur per quod servicium tenet.

Johannes Greiz tenet duas partes villarum de Eston' et de Parva Scorstan' in capite de rege per servicium de falconaria domini regis.

Prior de Stawell' tenet terciam partem earundem villarum in capite de rege in pura elemosina.

Henricus de Hertham tenet in Audrinton' iij. hidas terre de Waltero de Clifford per servicium custodiendi castrum suum de Clifford per xl. dies, et idem Walterus de domino rege in capite.

Patricius de Chawurces tenet j. carucatam terre in Lavinton' de heredibus Willelmi Bruer, et heredes in capite de rege, set nescitur per quod servicium.

Ricardus Danesy tenet quatuor hidas et dimidiam in Dulton' et Bratton' in capite de rege per seriantiam cum armis ad preceptum domini regia.

Eudo Burnel tenet Penligrave in capite de rege pro xxx. solidis annuatim solvendis, scilicet ad scaccarium x.s. et prioratui de Ferleg' xx.s. de dono antecessorum domini regis.

Jacobus de Lia tenet apud Hurstan' ij. virgatas terre ad feudi firmam in capite de rege solvendo per annum x.s. ad scaccarium.

Prior de Ferleg' tenet in Lia x. libratas terre in pura elemosina de dono Radulfi de Lamvelay, et ipse tenet in capite de rege.

Prior de Stivinton' tenet in Westbir' de Waltero de Pavely c. solidatas terre in pura elemosina, et ipse de Willelmo de Plugenet, et ipse Willelmus in capite de rege de veteri feufamento.

Idem prior tenet in eadem villa c. solidatas terre in pura elemosina de Eva de Bassingeburn', et ipsa de Eva de Tracy, et ipsa Eva de Tracy de Fulcone filio Warini, et Fulco in capite de rege.

Abbas de Stanleg' tenet apud Godewul' j. carucatam terre in pura elemosina de dono Hugonis de Plugenet, et ipse tenet in capite de rege.

Nicholaus Spileman tenet in Helmerton' j. hidam terre in socagio de heredibus Willelmi Spileman', et Willelmus tenuit de rege per servicium inveniendi j. servientem ad arma.

Prior de Bradenestok' tenet villam de Branestok de dono Walteri comitis Saresberie, et heredes Walteri de cap' [2] de rege de veteri feufamento.

Willelmus de Horton' tenet ad feudi firmam xj. hidas in Hiweie de episcopo Saresberiensi quas idem episcopus habuit de abbate de Malmesbir' pro bono pacis habendo de quadam causa que vertebatur inter eos, et abbas de domino rege in capite.

Homines de Melkesham tenent villam cum pertinenciis de Melkesham ad firmam de domino rege.


[1] Read Marceny.
[2] Read in capite.

WILTS. 741

S.ij.20.I.662-681 - cont.

Johannes de Plesseto tenet castrum Divisarum cum villa et villam de Ruges ad firmam de domino rege.

Prior de Ferleg' tenet villam de Ferleg' in pura elemosina de comite Herefordie, et ipse de rege in capite.

Jacobus de Bouebek tenet in socagio villam de Westwude de priore Sancti Suthuni, et ipse de rege in pura elemosina.

Herbertus filius Petri tenet villam de Maningeford' in capite de domino rege, et pertinet ad baroniam suam de veteri feufamento.

Comes de Hereford' in dominico Manigeford et Wilesford in capite de rege de honore de Trobrig'.

Robertus Doinel tenet Hiwis in capite de rege per sergantiam de quodam hauberco ad servicium regis.

Fulco Basset tenet villam de Uppav' de domino rege, set nescitur per quod servicium.

Abbas de Insula Dei tenet Cherleton' in pura elemosina de dono Reginaldi de Pavely, et ipse tenuit de rege.

Hawisia Cusin tenet Stokes in soccagio de abbatissa de Sancto Edwardo, et ipsa de rege.

Prior de Bradenestok' tenet villam de Wilcot' in pura elemosina de dono comitis Saresberie, et ipse tenuit de rege.

Abbas de Hida tenet Manigeford in pura elemosina de domino rege in capite.

Johannes de Nevill' tenet Harham in baronia de rege in capite de honore de Stokes Curcy.

Radulfus filius Nicholai tenet Estharam de Johanne filio Galfridi de Nevill' de dominico suo et de novo feufamento et de rege in capite.

Petronilla de Tony tenet villam de Brutford in baronia in capite de rege.

Johannes Girebert tenet in Brutford j. hidam terre per seriantiam de Rogero de Langeford, et ipse de rege.

Girardus de Wollope tenet j. hidam terre per seriantiam in eadem villa de Johanne de Grimsted'.

Rogerus de Langeford tenet villam de Langeford per sergantiam in capite de rege.

Prior de Bradeleg' tenet villam de Huminton' de Johanne filio Galfridi de Nevill' in pura elemosina, et ipse de rege de novo feufamento.

Abbatissa de Prewes tenet in Huminton' j. hidam terre de comite Leycestrie in pura elemosina, et ipso de rege.

Johannes de Blesseto [1] tenet villam de Cumbe in custodia de rege, et fuit Johannis Biset, et ipse tenit [2] de rege.

Petronilla de Tony tenet villam de Stratford in dote de herede Radulfi de Touny, et ipse de rege.

Abbas de Radinges tenet villam de Wihchebir' in pura elemosina de dono anticessorum regis Anglie.

Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet villam de Kalne ad feudi firmam de rege pro xv.li. per annum.


[1] Read Plesseto.
[2] Read tenuit.

742 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.662-681 - cont.

Henricus tesaurarius ecclesie Saresberie tenet duas partes de Kalne in prebenda ecclesie predicte in pura elemosina de dono antecessorum domini regis.

Fulco Basset tenet villam de Berewyk in capite de rege, solvendo per annum j. sperverium mutarium.

Abbatissa de Lacoc tenet medietatem ville de Hedinton' de dono Ele comitisse Saresberie in pura elemosina de assensu comitis Saresberie de rege.

Rogerus filius Walteri de Kaleston' tenet in villa de Kaleston' duas carucatas terre in capite de rege, et solvit per annum ad scaccarium lviiij.s. iiij.d.

Abbas de Bello tenet villam de Bromham in pura elemosina de dono antecessorum domini regis.

Rogerus filius Alexandri tenet villam de Stodleg' de comitissa de Warwik pro c.s. per annum, et ipsa de comite Cestrie, et comes de rege.

Quidam canonicus Saresberie tenet c. solidatas terre in Zitesbir' de prebenda ecclesie Saresberie de dono episcopi Saresberiensis.

Patricius de Chawurcis tenet Berewik' in capite de rege, et pertinet ad baroniam de Kinemarford.

Idem Patricius tenet j. carucatam terre in Lavinton' de heredibus Willelmi Bruer', et heredes de rege, set nescitur per quod servicium.

Elias Giffard tenet Scirnton' et Winterburn' in dominico de rege in capite; pertinent ad baroniam suam.

Willelmus le Moine tenet in Madinton' j. carucatam terre per sergantiam in capite de domino rege.

Priorissa de Ambreabir' tenet medietatem de Madinton' in pura elemosina de domino rege.

Laurencius le Gras tenet in Tydolfeshide j. hidam terre per sergantiam de Willelmo Spileman, et ipse per sergantiam de rege in capite.

Johannes le Rus tenet in Winterburn j. hidam et dimidiam terre de Thoma de Apelton' solvendo ij.s. per annum, et ipse de Comite Ricardo de honore de Walingford.

Abbatissa de Kaam tenet medietatem de Tydolfeshid' in capite de rege in pura elemosina.

Nicholaus de Wily tenet in Langeford c. solidatas terre de abbatissa Wiltonie in socagio, et ipsa de rege in capite.

Abbatissa de Wilton' tenet in Quedhampton' et Bimerton' j. hidam terre in pura elemosina de Galfrido Camerario, et ipse de Ingeram de Praus, et ipse de rege.

Decanus de Morton' tenet in Hangindelangeford c. solidatas terre in capite in elemosina de dono Regis Ricardi.

Comes Herefordie tenet Wockes', Cuuleston' et Suthneuton', et dicunt juratores quod Wokes' pertinet ad constabulariam Anglie, et relique ville sunt de honore de Trobrigg'.

Adam de Puriton' et Hugo Peverel tenent in Chegelewe v. virgatas terre et dimidiam de honore de Wahngeford, aet nescitur per quod servicium.

WILTS. 743

S.ij.20.I.662-681 - cont.

Abbas Glastonie tenet villam de Nettlinton'. Grutefinton' et Kington' in capite de rege de baronia sua.

Idem abbas tenet Cristimalford in pura elemosina de episcopatu Bathonie, et ipse de rege.

Galfridus de Cerne tenet Draicot' pro iij.s. per annum de Johanne de Venuz, et ipse de rege per sergantiam marescalcie sue.

Abbas de Sancto Victorie tenet Hundelavinton' in pura elemosina de dono antecessorum Radulfi de Mortuo Mari, et Radulfus de rege.

Symon de Eldresfeld tenet Foxleg' de abbatissa Sancti Edwardi in socagio, et abbatissa in elemosina de rege.

Abbas de Malemesbir' tenet Brokeneberhe, Corston', Sutton', Norton', Neuton', Credewell', Kemelegh', Cherleton', Careston', Brengewurth' in pura elemosina de veteri feufamento.

Galfridus de Mandevill' tenet in Sweweclive in soccagio pro lx.s. de Radulfo filio Urcy.

Henricus filius Radulfi tenet in eadem villa j. hidam terre in soccagio de abbatissa de Sancto Edwardo, et ipsa de rege in capite.

Goda de Berewik' tenet Berewik' ad feudi firmam de abbatissa Sancti Edwardi, et ipsa de rege.

Hamo de Hache tenet villam de Westhacch' de abbatissa Sancti Edwardi in soccagio, et abbatissa de rege.

Alfredus de Wik' tenet villam de Wik' de abbatissa predicta pro j. marca per annum, et abbatissa de rege.

Abbatissa de Sancto Edwardo tenet villam de Dunheved cum pertinenciis in pura elemosina de dono Regis Edgari.

Thomas le Savage tenet villam de Fofunte ad feudi firmam de abbatissa Wiltonie, et ipsa de rege in pura elemosina.

Nicholaus Avenel tenet in Bereford j. carucatam terre in capite de rege, et clamat per seriantiam custodire forestam de Graveleg'.

Philippus filius Ernis tenet in eadem villa j. carucatam terre per seriantiam de Rogero de Mobray, et clamat custodire predictam forestam.

Willelmus de Karentem tenet j. virgatam terre in eadem villa per seriantiam de rege in capite et solvit per annum ix.s. et iij.d. ad ecclesiam Saresberie, et custodit forestam de Graveling.

Abbas de Funtennay tenet in Middeldun' j. hidam terre in pura elemosina de dono antecessorum Elye Giffard.

Walterus de Dunestanvill' tenet in dominico villam de Sterte in capite de rege, et pertinet ad baroniam suam.

Henricus Crok tenet manerium de Aselbir' de honore Walinefordie, set non comparuit ad inquisicionem faciendam.

Domus de Bradeleg' tenet manerium de Bradeleg' de dono Manscri Biset, et tenet de comite Marescallo per servicium xij.d. per annum, et idem comes de rege de honore de Pembrok.

Episcopus de Lisewis tenet iiij. hidas terre in Deverel in pura elemosina de domino rege.

744 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.621-627.

INQUISICIO FACTA DE FEUDIS MILITUM IN COMITATU WILTES DE HUNDREDIS DE AMBRESBIR', AYLWARDEBIR', ET KINEWAREST'.

De feudis Comitis Saresberie. Breve.

Philippus de Melews tenet j. feudum militis in Tudewrth de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege in capite.

Robertus de Gumay tenet quartam partem feudi unius militis in Wilewe de dicto comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Willelmus de Demeford' tenet dimidium feudum militis in Parva Demeford' de dicto comite, et ipse de rege in capite.

Robertus de Columbariis tenet quartam partem feodi j. militis in Netetune de Warino filio Geroldi, et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Willelmus de Demeford' tenet iiijor partes feudi unius militis in Superiori Demeford' de Waltero filio Bernardi, et idem Walterus de comite, et comes de rege.

Jordanus le Esvesk tenet dimidium feudum militis in eadem Demeford' de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Johannes Teobald' tenet quintam partem feudi j. militis in Parva Wiwilesford' de Ricardo filio Aucheri, et idem Ricardus de comite, et ipse de rege.

Reynerus de Bungeye et Johannes le Saucer tenent dimidium feudum militis in Westambresbir' de Patricio de Muntfort, et idem Patricius de dicto comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Everardus Teonicus tenet quartam partem feudi j. militis in Ambreabir' de dicto comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Galfridus Goiun tenet quintam partem feudi unius militis in Ambreabir' de dicto comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Agatha de Meysy tenet quintam partem feudi j. militis in Netetun' de comite Saresberie, et ipse de rege.

Galfridus de Lukinton' et participea sui tenent quartam partem feudi j. militis in Porton' de Johanne de Badinton', et ipse de dicto comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Willelmus Maleweyn tenet quintam partem feudi j. militis in Merton' de dicto comite, et comes de rege in capite.

De feudia Comitis de Herford'. Breve.

Alanus filius Warini et Robertus Braybof tenent j. feudum militis de comite de Herford', et comes de rege in capite.

Johannes de Chireburg' tenet feodum unius militis in Winterburn' de dicto comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Johannes de la Posterne tenet xxmam partem feudi unius militis de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Johannes de Newill' tenet feudum unius militis in Newton' et in Winterslawe de dicto comite, et ipse de rege.

Philippus de Depeford' et Galfridus Goiun tenent feudum j. militis in Ambresbir' de dicto comite, et ipse de rege.

De feodis Comitis Marescalli. Breve.

Matheus Huse tenet dimidium feodum militis in Tudewrth' de comite Marescallo, et comes Marescallus in capite de rege.

WILTS. 745

S.ij.20.I.621-627 - cont.

Alanus de Bassingburn' tenet feodum unius militis in Cheldrinton' de Ricardo de Argenteil, et idem Ricardus de Eudone Bernard', et idem Eudo de dicto comite Marescallo, et dictua de rege in capite.

Mabilla Bernard tenet feodum j. militis in Boscumbe per servicium dimidii feodi militis de dicto Eudone, et idem de dicto comite, et comea de rege in capite.

Robertus de Columbariis tenet dimidium feudum militis in Sabertun' de Warino filio Geraldi, et idem Warinus de dicto comite, et idem comes de rege in capite.

Robertus de Stutescumb' et Willelmus de Hamme tenent j. feudum militis in Cherleton' de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Robertus de Bello Campo et Hugo le Poer et Ricardus Beneg' tenent j. feudum militis in Wollhale de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Thomas le Sawage tenet j. feudum militis in Borebach' de dicto comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Walterus de Ripariis tenet j. feudum militis in Wotton' de dicto comite, et comes de rege in capite.

Johannes Fucher tenet quintam partem feudi j. militis in Midelton' de dicto comite, et comes de rege in capite.

De feudis Roberti Tregoz. Breve.

Willelmus le Droys tenet j. feudum militis in Saldeburn' de Roberto Tregoz, et idem Robertus de rege in capite.

De feudis Walteri de Dunstanvill'. Breve.

Gilebertus le Engleis tenet tres partes feudi unius militis in Welpeleye de Waltero de Dunstanvill', et ipse de rege in capite.

Gilbertus de Muleford tenet xxmam partem feudi unius militis in Muleford' de dicto Waltero, et idem Walterus de rege.

De feudis Comitis Ricardi. Breve.

Walterus de Dunestanvill' tenet dimidium feudum militis de honore Walingfordie.

De feodis Comitis Insule. Breve.

Hugo de Sancto Martino tenet dimidium feudum militis in Hochull' de Matheo de Columbariis, et ipse de comite Insule, et comes Insule de rege in capite.

Johannes de Columbariis tenet dimidium feudum militis in Froxfeld' de Matheo de Columbariis, et Matheus de comite Marescallo, et comes Marescallus de comite Insule, et comes de rege.

Willelmus Warin tenet dimidium feudum militis in Fifhide de Isabella de Mortuo Mari, et Isabella de comite Insule, et comes de rege in capite.

Willelmus de Newill' tenet dimidium feudum militis in Chelewrth de comite Saresberie, et comes de Henrico Basset, et Henricus de Matheo de Columbariis, et Matheus de comite Insule, et ipse comes de rege in capite.

746 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.621-627 - cont.

Prior de Merton' tenet quartam partem feudi j. militis de [1] comite Insule, et comes de rege in capite.

Hic --- Cras.

De feodis Patricii de Chaurces. Breve.

Hugo de Sancto Martino tenet in Standen' feudum j. militis de Patricio de Chaurces, et ipse de rege in capite.

Johannes de Aure tenet dimidium feudum militis in Aldinton' [2] de dicto Patricio, et ipse de rege in capite.

De feodis Henrici Huse. In rotulo.

Willelmus Huse et Gwydo de Areingnes tenent dimidium feudum militis in Knitteton' de Matheo Huse, et ipse de Henrico Huse, et Henricus de rege in capite.

Galfridus Huse tenet dimidium feodum militis in Sexamecot de Henrico Huse, et ipse de rege in capite.

De feodis Elye Giffard. In rotulo.

Elyas de Kaylewey et Godefridus de Eskidemor' tenent duo feuda militum in +Kaylewent'+ de Elya Giffard, et ipse de rege.

De feodo Walteri de Clifford. In rotulo.

Radulfus de Langetot tenet dimidium feudum militis de Waltero de Clifford', et ipse de rege in capite.

De feodis Comitis Leycestrie. Breve.

Robertus de Leyham' tenet feudum j. militis in Aletune de comite Leycestrie, et ipse comes de rege in capite.

Simon de Monte Forti tenet quartam partem feudi unius militis in Cumpton' in capite de rege.

De feodis Comitis Wintonie. Breve.

Matheus Turpin tenet dimidium feudum militis in Wintreslawe de comite Wyntonie, et comes de rege in capite.

Abbas de Deford [3] et prior Sancti Dionisii tenent duas partes feudi unius militis in Ablinton' de dicto comite, et ipse de rege.

Comes Wintonie tenet dimidium feudum militis in Cumpton' in capite de rege.

De feodo Johannis de Neuuill'. In rotulo.

Walterus de Lilebon tenet dimidium feodum militis in Middelton' de Johanne de Newill', et ipse de rege in capite.

De feodo Abbatis Glastonie. In rotulo prelatorum.

Henricus de Vallibus tenet duas partes feodi j. militis in Idemeston' de Roberto de Gurnay, et ipse de abbate Glastonie, et ipse de rege.


[1] de comite repeated.
[2] Read Cheldrinton.
[3] Read Dureford.

WILTS. 747

S.ij.20.I.621-627 - cont.

De feodis Abbatis de Malmesbir'. In rotulo prelatorum.

Adam de Periton tenet tres partes feodi unius militis in Periton de abbate de Malmesbir' et ipse de rege in capite.

Robertus Malreward tenet in eadem villa viijtam partem feodi j. militis de dicto abbate, et abbas de rege in capite.

De feodis Willelmi de Cantilupo. Breve.

Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet dimidium feodum militis in Midleston' de honore de Brisloud'.

Ricardus de Caunvill' tenet in Dichampton' quartam partem feodi j. militis de Philippo Marmiun, et ipse de rege in capite, et est in custodia domini Willelmi de Cantilupo.

De feodis Abbatis de Hida. Breve. In rotulo prelatorum.

Avicia de Columbariis tenet tria feoda militum in Cette, Colingburn', et Winterburn', in Westambresbir', Laverkestok et Bereford' de abbate de Hida, et ipse in capite de rege.

De diversis feodis.

Johannes de Chireburgh tenet in Sende quartam partem feodi j. militis in capite de rege. In rotulo.

Willelmus le Droes tenet j. feodum militis in Corston' de Rogero de Chandoys, et Rogerus de rege. In rotulo.

Willelmus filius Warini tenet in Fifhide dimidium feodum militis in Fifhide de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de rege in capite.

De feodis Johannis de Munemue.

Robertus Walrand' tenet terciam partem feodi j. militis in Watden' de Albreda de Botereus, et ipsa de rege in capite. In rotulo.

Johannes de Munemue, Albreda de Botereus et Johanna de Newill' tenent in Dene et Grimested unum feodum militis preter xiijam [1] partem in capite de rege. In rotulo. [2]

Odo de Grimested' tenet in Grimested' xmam partem feodi unius militis de Johanne de Monemue et Albreda de Botereus et Johanna de Nevill', et ipsi de rege in capite. In rotulo.

Ricardus de Grimested' tenet in Grimested' unum feodum militis in capite de rege. In rotulo.

Prior de Monasterio Ederoso tenet xmam partem feodi unius militis in Bereford de feodo Roberti Giffard. In rotulo.

S.ij.20.

Nomina xij. juratorum de hundredo de Selkel' de inquisicione feudorum militum, dominus Robertus de Stutescumb', Willelmus de Kardunvill', dominus Hamo de Bachampton', Ricardus de Henton',


[1] The scribe originally wrote quintam. This he underlined for deletion, and wrote above it xaiij. Read xmam.
[2] The face of the membrane ends here with the note retro verte.

748 A.D 1242-1243.

S.ij.20 - cont.

Elyas de Bosco, Willelmus filius Walerand', Ricardus de Suckermund', Willelmus de Ringesburn', Johannes Barbast', Willelmus de Aula, Nicholaus Croc, Petrus Sewinus de Audiburn'.

I.658-661.

Audiburn'. Willelmus Lungespey tenet manerium de Audiburn' cum pertinenciis et manerium de Wamberg' cum pertinenciis et centum solidatas terre in Niwebur' cum pertinencus et centum solidatas terre in Tudingdun' cum pertinenciis et medietatem manerii de Schriveham cum pertinencus per servicium duorum militum pro omni servicio de domino rege.

Mildehal. Dominus Reginaldus de Mohun tenet x. hidas terre in Mildehal' in libero maritagio cum filia domini Willelmi de Ferrar', et Willelmus de Ferrar' tenuit de dono Willelmi Marescalli cum filia sua, et Marescallus nunquam fecit inde scutagium.

Stutescumb'. Dominus Robertus de Stutescumb' tenet j. hidam terre in eadem de honore domini Willelmi de Bello Campo in socagio, et non facit scutagium.

Polton'. Abbas de Theockesbur' tenet j. feudum militis per servicium militare de domino Waltero de Dunatevil'; idem Walterus de domino rege. Item Willelmus de Kardevill' tenet in eadem j. feudum militis per servicium militare de predicto Waltero; idem Walterus de rege.

Maniton'. Hugo de Dovre tenet dimidium feudum militis in eadem de Sampsone Follot faciendo scutagium, et idem Sampson de Comite Ricardo de honore de Walingeford, Comes Ricardus de domino rege.

Clatford. Abbas Sancti Victoris tenet in eadem v. hidas terre in elemosina de Radulfo de Mortuo Mari, et Radulfus de domino rege in capite.

Lokerigg'. Ricardus Quintin tenet j. feudum militis de comite Herefordie et facit scutagium, et comes de episcopo Wintoniensi, episcopus de rege. Item in eadem Templarii tenent ij. hidas in elemosina de domino rege.

Fiffhide. Prior Wintonie tenet manerium in elemosina de domino rege.

Uverton'. Prior Wintonie tenet Uverton' in elemosina de domino rege. Item in eadem abbatissa Wiltonie tenet decem hidas terre de domino rege.

Schages. Henricus le Dun tenet in eadem terciam partem militis de Simone de Dun per servicium militare, et Simon de comite Kancie, comes de domino rege. Item Thomas de Kenet tenet in eadem sextam partem feudi militis per servicium militare de honore episcopi Wintoniensis, episcopus de domino rege.

Kenet'. Thomas de Kenet' tenet in eadem tres hidas terre de domino Roberto Tregoz per senescalciam, et dominus Robertus de domino rege. Item in eadem Willelmus de Ringeburn' tenet terciam partem feudi militis de honore Walteri Walerand', et facit scutagium, et Walterus de domino rege. Item in eadem idem Willelmus tenet j. hidam et dimidiam de abbatissa Wintonie in socagio, et abbatissa de domino rege. Item in eadem Johannes Barbast' tenet iiij. hidas in socagio de feudo domini Roberti de Tregoz, et Robertus de rege. Item Walterus filius Johannis tenet in eadem dimidium feudum

WILTS. 748

S.ij.20.I.658-661 - cont.

militis de feudo Roberti Tregoz, et facit scutagium, et Robertus de domino rege. Item in eadem Willelmus Crespin tenet iij. hidas et dimidiam in socagio de feudo Roberti Tregoz, et Robertus de rege.

Bachampton' et Stanmere. Dominus Hamon' de Bachampton' tenet in eadem j. feudum militis et duas partes feudi militis de Matheo de Columbariis per servicium militare, idem Hatheus de comite Marescallo, comes Marescallus de comite de Insula, comes de Insula de domino rege.

Avebir'. Abbas de Sancto Georgio de Barkarvill' tenet manerium de Avebur' cum pertinenciis in elemosina de dono domini Henrici Regis, avi domini nostri Henrici Regis.

Winterburn'. Abbas de Glaston' tenet manerium de Winterburn' in elemosina de domino rege. Item in eadem domina Gricia de Meysy tenet quinque partes feudi militis de eodem abbate et facit scutagium dicto abbati.

Ricardeston'. Ricardus Teobaldus tenet in eadem dimidium feudum militis de Marescallo et facit scutagium, Marescallus de domino rege. Item in eadem Willelmus Quintin tenet quartem partem feudi militis per servicium militare de honore comitis Herefordie, comes de rege.

Abbedeston'. Priorissa de Ambresbur' tenet manerium ipsum in elemosina de domino rege.

Winterburn' Basset. Reginaldus de Mohun tenet manerium pro dimidio feudo militis per servicium militare de feudo Walteri de Dunstanvill', et Walterus de domino rege.

Henton'. Ricardus de Henton tenet ij. feuda militum in eadem de Matheo de Columbariis per servicium militare, Matheus de comite Marescallo, comes Marescallus de comite de Insula, comes de Insula de domino rege. Item idem Ricardus tenet in eadem v. hidas terre in socagio de feudo Willelmi de Brause de honore de Kington'. Item in eadem heredes Reginaldi Wace tenent feudum et dimidium militis per servicium militare de Waltero de Dunstanvill', et Walterus de rege.

Rockel'. Hugo de Kilpec tenet in eadem j. feudum militis per servicium militare de feudo Roberti Tregoz, et Robertus de rege.

Ockeburn', Abbas de Becco tenet manerium in elemosina de dono Brionis filii Comitis et de dono Matillidis de Walingeford' de honore de Walingeford'.

Item in eadem Willelmus de Stock' et Nicholaus Croc tenent dimidium feudum militis de Sampsone Foliot per servicium militare, idem Sampson de Comite Ricardo, Comes Ricardus de domino rege.

Ockeburn' Meysy. Bartholomeus de Emneburg' tenet in eadem duas partes feudi militis de honore comitis Glovernie per servicium militare, comes de domino rege. Item in eadem Philippus Croc et heredes Roberti de Meysy et Robertus de Afford' tenent dimidium feudum militis de Roberto Marmium per servicium militare de honore comitis Glovernie, comes de domino rege.

S.ij.20 - cont.

[Endorsed:-] Rotulus de inquisicione feodoram militum. Wiltes. Rotulus receptus per ballivos de Marleberge.

750 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20 - cont.

Rotulus de inquisicione feodorum militum in hundredo de Selkel', preter libertatem domini episcopi Saresberiensis in quam non habemus ingressum.

SOMERSET AND DORSET.

S.ij.20.I.694-699.

SUMERSET ET DORSET.

FEODA EORUM QUI TENENT DE DOMINO REGE IN CAPITE ET EORUM QUI DE IPSIS TENENT.

Holne j. feodum de honore Glucestrie.

Lesseton' j. feodum de eodem.

Durewineston' tres partes feodi de eodem.

Winterborn' Maureward' j. feodum de eodem.

Winterborn' Clench j. feodum de eodem.

Mordon' j. feodum de eodem.

Knolton' j. feodum de eodem.

Fifhyde Johannis de Sancto Quintino j. feodum de eodem.

Bakebere dimidium feodum de eodem.

Akford' Eschelling iiij. feoda de eodem.

Tarente Gundevil' j. feodum de eodem.

Tollard ij. feoda de eodem.

Pitrichesham dimidium feodum de eodem.

Wichhampton' j. feodum de eodem.

Tarente Petri de Russell' j. feodum de eodem.

Littlefroma j. feodum de eodem.

Deuelis j. feodum de eodem.

Aysmere j. feodum de eodem.

Winterborn' Malemains j , feodum de eodem.

Melebir' Turbervill' dimidium feodum de eodem.

Robertus de Gurnay x. feoda de eodem honore.

Northovere dimidium feodum de eodem.

Babekary dimidium feodum de eodem.

Ludeford' j. feodum.

Swaneswich j. feodum de baronia Alvredi de Lincolnia. Habet breve.

Godmaneston' j. feodum de eodem.

Watercumbe j. feodum de eodem.

Chauvedon' j. feodum et dimidium de eodem.

Wermewull' j. feodum de eodem.

Gardinum quarta pars unius feodi de eodem.

Bradeleghe octava pars unius feodi de eodem.

Boclande j. feodum de eodem.

Brode Way, j. feodum de eodem.

Waye Pigace dimidium feodum de eodem.

Winterborne Esse j. feodum de eodem.

Stafford' j. feodum de eodem.

Stafford' Turberevil' tres partes unius feodi de eodem.

SOMERSET AND DORSET. 761

S.ij.20.I.694-699 - cont.

Coleweye dimidium feodum de eodem.

Tarente Willelmi de Antioche ij. partes feodi unius militis.

Kington' et Winterborn' Quarel j. feodum de eodem.

Winterborn' Rocheford' j. feodum de eodem.

Mordon' Roberti j. feodum de eodem.

Froma Witefeld' iij. feoda de eodem.

Swanewiz j. feodum de feodo Roberti de Novo Burgo.

Winesham ij. partes unius feodi de eodem.

Wrokeshale j. feodum de eodem.

Bexinton' j. feodum de eodem.

Item idem Robertus de Novo Burgo x. feoda.

Philippus de Columbariis vij. feoda et dimidium.

Willelmus de Monte Acuto x. feoda et dimidium de Mort'.

Katerina de Monte Acuto x. feoda de Moret'.

Johannes de Nevill' xxiiij. feoda et dimidium et tres partes.

Nicholaus de Molis et Radulfus Russel xvj. feoda et dimidium ij. tercias et quartam partem.

Kolinus filius Martin vij. feoda.

Galfridus de Maundevil' xiiij. feoda et dimidium et quartam partem.

Reginaldus de Moyn xlj. feoda.

Hugo de Vivon' et Robertus de Mucegros xxij. feoda, dimidium, ij. tercias, quatuor partes et xxam.

Winterborne j. feodum de feodo Roberti de Bello Campo.

Mordon' et Lolesworth' j. feodum de eodem.

Winterborn' Gemain [1] j. feodum de eodem.

Winterborn' Musters j. feodum de eodem.

Willelmus de Witefeld' iij. feoda de eodem.

Winterborn' Harang j. feodum de eodem.

Cernemuwe j. feodum de eodem.

Crawecumb' ij. feoda de eodem.

Sok ij. feoda de eodem.

Hache j. feodum de Moret' de eodem.

Abbas de Mucheln' j. feodum de domino rege.

Abbas de Abbedesbir' j. feodum de eodem.

Abbas de Cerne ij. feoda de eodem.

Abbas de Schireborn' ij. feoda et quintam partem de eodem.

Abbatissa de Sancto Eadwardo xj. feoda et dimidium et vjtam partem in manu domini regis.

Radulfus de Sulligni quartam partem feodi de domino rege in capite.

Johannes de Aure cum herede Odonis de Wandestr' dimidium feodum de eodem.

Robertus de Merlande j. feodum de eodem.


[1] Read Germain.

752 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.694-699 - cont.

Robertus de Gurnay dimidium feodum de eodem.

Hampford' abbatisse de Tarente dimidium feodum de eodem.

Custodes heredum Johannis le Danya quartam partem feodi in Ivelcestr' de eodem.

Willelmus Braunche quartam partem feodi de eodem.

Godefridus de Alno j. feodum de eodem.

Ricardus Pulain j. feodum de eodem.

Ricardus de Wrotham j. feodum de eodem.

Robertus Belet j. feodum de eodem.

Abbatissa de Tarente cum herede Willelmi de Kahaynes iij. feoda de eodem.

Robertus de Briwea dimidium feodum de eodem.

Robertus de Pavely j. feodum de Mort'.

Nicholaus de Meriet j. feodum et dimidium de Moret' de eodem.

Sabina de Ortyaco, heres Ricardi Revel, ij. feoda de eodem.

Blaneford' Belet j. feodum de eodem.

Gessich Omnium Sanctorum j. feodum de eodem.

Johannes Marescallus iij. feoda de eodem.

Willelmus de Fendnes j. feodum de eodem.

Henricus Hoese j. feodum de eodem.

Godefridus' de Crawecumbe j. feodum.

Stodlonde j. feodum et dimidium de feodo Henrici filii Ricardi de Moret'.

Weston' et Bere ij. feoda de eodem.

Cherleton' ij. feoda de eodem.

Rodlington' j. feodum de feodo Margerie Pagani.

Wurthe j. feodum de eodem.

Langeblaneford' Tilly j. feodum de eodem.

Stupele Kari dimidium feodum de eodem.

Item eadem Margeria tenet xj. feoda et dimidium.

Robertus de Baketrepe iij. partes feodi de feodo Ricardi Luvel.

Matheus de Clividon' j. feodum de eodem.

Thomas de Cruket ij. feoda de eodem de Mort'.

Sperkeford' j. feodum de eodem.

Sud Berwe ij. feoda de eodem de Mort' de eodem.

Northberwe j. feodum de eodem.

Willelmus de Witefeld' j. feodum de eodem.

Robertus de Cuntevil' j. feodum de eodem.

Henricus de Cuntevil' sextam partem feodi.

Brocton' j. feodum de eodem de Mor'.

Redlys ij. feoda prefer octavam partem.

Brigford' de feodo Walteri de Esselegh ij. feoda de Mortoing.

Holewell' j. feodum de eodem.

Wudeton' et Forde ij. feoda de eodem.


[1] This entry is interlined.

SOMERSET AND DORSET. 753

S.ij.20.I.694-699 - cont.

Wamereshegh' xma pars feodi.

Littleton' j. feodum de Mor'.

Ese Bretel j. feodum de eodem.

Swelle j. feodum de eodem.

Tarente Grice j. feodum de feodo Marescalli.

Lischet ij. feoda de eodem.

Latherton' dimidium feodum de feodo de Chyweton'.

Blaneford Philippi de Tylly dimidium feodum de eodem.

Midelton' iij. partes feodi de eodem.

Hineton' iij. partes feodi de eodem.

Kerchil Sifrast dimidium feodum de eodem.

Stures Paen de feodo Roberti de Gurnay dimidium feodum.

Were j. feodum de eodem.

Babekary dimidium feodum de eodem.

Stupelkary dimidium feodum de eodem.

Sandford' j. feodum de eodem.

Lodefford dimidium feodum de eodem.

Powelet dimidium feodum de eodem.

Parva Kington' j. feodum de feodo heredis Waleran'.

Manneston' j. feodum de eodem.

Sutton' j. feodum de eodem.

Winterborn' Thorn' j. feodum de eodem.

Winterborn' Turbervill' j. feodum de eodem.

Westchikerel de feodo Matillidis [1] de Revers j. feodum.

Craweford' j. feodum de eodem.

Childakford' j. feodum de feodo comitis Insule.

Hyneton' et Esseton' j. feodum de eodem.

Knyhteton' dimidium feodum de feodo Thome Brien.

Nutford' quarta para feodi Roberti Belet.

Plumber' dimidium feodum de feodo de Salesbir'.

Winterborn' Moyun ij. feoda de eodem.

Magna Kington' ij. feoda de eodem.

Craweford' dimidium feodum de eodem.

[Endorsed:-] In libro.

Rotulus feodorum de Sumerset et de Dorset.

S.ij.20.I.733-735.

FEODA MILITUM IN COMITATIBUS SOMERSET ET DORSET.

Abbas de Muchelny tenet unum feodum de domino rege.

Abbas de Abbedesbir' tenet j. feodum de eodem.


[1] Read Margerie.

754 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.733-735 - cont.

Abbas de Schireborne tenet ij. feoda et quintam partem feodi de eodem.

Johannes Marescallus tenet tria feoda de eodem.

Ricardus Luvel tenet ix. magna feoda, vij. et dimidium de Mortem de eodem.

Willelmus Branch' tenet dimidium feodum, cum herede Radulfi filii Bernardi de eodem.

Willelmus de Monte Acuto tenet viij. feoda de eodem de feodo de Moret'.

Godefridus de Auno tenet j. feodum de eodem.

Ricardus Pulain tenet j. feodum de eodem de Moret'.

Philippus de Columbariis tenet x. feoda de eodem.

Katerina de Monte Acuto tenet ix. feoda de eodem de Moretann'.

Ricardus de Wroteham tenet j. feodum de eodem.

Robertus Belet tenet ij. feoda de eodem.

Willelmus de Kaynnes tenet iij. feoda de eodem.

Radulfus de Sulenye tenet dimidium feodum de eodem.

Henricus filius Ricardi tenet v. feoda de eodem de Moret'.

Nicholaus filius Martini tenet vj. feoda et dimidium de eodem.

Johannes de Aure tenet dimidium feodum de eodem.

Robertus de Gurnay tenet dimidium feodum de eodem.

Robertus de Merlande tenet dimidium feodum de eodem.

Robertus de Bello Campo tenet xvij. feoda de eodem de Moret'.

Robertus de Pavely tenet ij. feoda et dimidium de eodem et quintam partem feodi et j. feodum de Mort'.

Radulfus Russel tenet iij. feoda et dimidium de eodem et viijam partem feodi.

Robertus filius Pagani tenet xv. feoda de eodem.

Nicholaus de Merieta tenet j. feodum et dimidium de eodem de Mor'.

Sabina de Ortiaco tenet ij. feoda de eodem.

Robertus de Novo Burgo tenet xv. feoda de eodem.

Robertus de Briwes tenet dimidium feodum de eodem de Mor'.

Nicholaus de Bonevill' tenet quartam partem feodi de eodem.

Reginaldus de Mohun tenet xlj. feoda de eodem.

Thomas Brien et Henricus de Haddon' tenent j. feodum de eodem.

Alvredus de Nich' tenet xxiiij. feoda de eodem et dimidio et iijus quintis et xvj. parte j. militis. Breve.

Willelmus Lungespee tenet xv. feoda de eodem. Breve.

Episcopus Bathoniensis tenet lx. feoda de eodem. Breve.

Hugo de Vivona et Robertus de Mucegros tenent xxij. feoda ij. partes feodi, iiijtam partem feodi et xxam partem de eodem. Breve.

Idem Hugo tenet vj. feoda et dimidium de terra Willelmi Martel. Breve.

Episcopus Sarisberiensis tenet xj. feoda et dimidium de eodem. Breve.

Johannes de Curtenay tenet iiij. feoda et dimidium de eodem. Breve.

Comes Marscallus tenet ix. feoda et iiijtam partem feodi de eodem. Breve.

SOMERSET AND DORSET. 755

S.ij.20.I.733-735 - cont.

Comes Insule tenet x. feoda et dimidium et duas partes feodi de eodem. Breve.

Nicholaus de Molls tenet iiij. feoda et quintam partem feodi de eodem. Breve.

Kerebertus filius Mathei tenet iij. feoda de Willelmo Paynel. Breve.

Patricius de Chaurs' tenet iiij. feoda et dimidium de rege. Breve.

Humfridus de Bohun tenet ij. feoda et dimidium de eodem. Breve.

Robertus Treigoz tenet ij, feoda et dimidium, ij. partes, iiijtam partem feodi et xxam partem de eodem. Breve.

Johannes de Burgo tenet v. feoda et quartam partem feodi et vjtam partem feodi de eodem. Breve.

Galfridus de Dinham tenet terciam partem feodi de eodem. Breve.

Gerardus de Odingesel' tenet iij. feoda de eodem. Breve.

Willelmus de Fennes tenet ij. feoda de eodem. Breve.

Galfridus de Mandevill' tenet xiiij. feoda et dimidium et iiijtam partem feodi de eodem. Breve.

Andreas Loterel tenet j. feodum de eodem. Breve.

Johannes de Nevill' tenet xij. feoda de eodem. Breve.

Willelmus de Odingesel' tenet iij. partes feodi de eodem. Breve.

Rogerus de Quency tenet dimidium feodum de eodem. Breve.

Abbas de Cerne tenet duo feoda de eodem. Breve.

Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet honorem de Brugewalt'. Breve.

Comes Ricardus recepit in comitatu Somers' scutagium de l. feodis et dimidio et v,a parte unius feodi de honore Glovernie. Breve.

Andreas Peverel tenet j. feodum de domino rege. Breve.

Abbas Glastonie tenet de eodem xl. feoda. Breve.

[Endorsed:-] Dorset et Sumerset, de scutagio Wasconie.

In libra.

DEVON.

S.ij.21.I.815-836.

Inquisicio feodorum et tenementorum in hundredo de Lifthon' facta per sacramentum Willelmi Trenchard', Willelmi de Hiwis, Rogeri de Parco, Galefridi de Curithon', Roberti de Bikkecoth', Ricardi de Veteri Ponte, Reginaldi de Cumb', Rogeri de Dyrehill', Augeri de Dunterton', Willelmi Pe de levre, Petri de Bovy et Ricardi Bareth.

Qui dicunt quod Willelmus Piparth' tenet in Kari terciam partem unius feodi de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Ricardus de Kary et Robertus de Bykkecoth' tenent in Tulleslo et in Bikkecoth' unum feodum de Gileberto filio Stephani, et ipse de Willelmo de Cantilupo de eodem honore.

Et quod Ricardus de Langeford' tenet dimidium feodum in Wyk' de Johanne de Curtenay de honore de Okemeton'.

756 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et quod heredes Henrici le Deneis tenent dimidium feodum in Sudwik' de heredibus Henrici de la Pomeraye de honore de Bery.

Et quod Hamel' de Deudone, Walterus de Ba et Ricardus le Breth tenent in Brathon', in Comb', et in Godescoth' unum feodum per medios de honore Johannis de Curtenay de honore de Okemeton'.

Et quod Philippus Taleboth' tenet in Surethon' et in Thrissel et in Meleford', que sunt in hoc hundredo, et in Kemmeworth' et in Thome, que sunt in hundredo de Blaketoriton' ij. feoda de Henrico de Tracy per medium de honore Barnestepol'.

Et quod Johannes de Curtenay tenet Okemeton' in dominico ut caput baronie sue.

Et in eodem manerio tenent de eo per servicia militaria Henricus Guboud in Alfardesdune dimidium feodum; Et Robertus de Meledon' in Meledon' sextam partem j. feodi; Et heredes Galfridi de la Hoke in La Hoke sextam partem unius feodi.

Et dicunt quod Elias de Trempol' tenet dimidium feodum in Stokkelegh' de Ricardo de Langeford', et Ricardus de Johanne de Curtenay de honore de Okemeton'.

Et quod Muriel de Bollay tenet unum feodum in Brightesstowe de predicto Johanne de honore de Okemeton'.

Et Warinua filius Juelis, Rogerus de Direhill' et Juel de Buketon' tenent unum feodum in Wyvelesworth' et in Standune et in Buredone per medium de Galfrido de Mandevil', et ipse Galfridus de comite Devonie de honore de Plimton'.

Et quod Johannes de Alba Mara tenet in Tavy dimidium feodum per medium de honore Tottonie, unde Willelmus de Cantilupo habet medietatem servicii et Reginaldus de Valle Torta aliam medietatem.

Et quod Johannes predictus tenet in Sideham, et in Waghefenne j. feodum et duas partes j. feodi de Ricardo de Veteri Ponte, et Ricardus de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Walterus Giffard' tenet in Lamerton' j. feodum de comite Devonie de honore de Plimton'.

Et quod Radulfus de Esse tenet in Cullecumb' dimidium feodum de Radulfo de Alba Mara, et Radulfus de comite Devonie de honore de Plimton'.

Et quod idem Radulfus tenet dimidium feodum in Willestre de Radulfo de Alba Mara per medium, et ipse Radulfus de predictis comite et honore.

Et Rogerus de Trellok tenet j. feodum in Duntertone de heredibus Willelmi de la Bruere, et ipsi de Johanne de Curtenay de honore de Okemeton'.

Et quod Robertus de Crues tenet dimidium feodum in Bradestane de Willelmo de Crues, et ipse de comite Devonie de honore de Plimton'.

Et quod Willelmus de Kelly tenet in Kelli et Medewill' j. feodum de Johanne de Curtenay de honore de Okemeton'.

Et quod Nicholaus de Esselegh' tenet in Esselegh' j. feodum de Johanne de Alba Mara, et ipse per medium de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie,

DEVON. 757

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et quod Mauricias de Sideham tenet in Parva Sideham duas partes j. feodi de Thoma Juelia, et Thomas de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore Tottonie.

Et quod prior Plimtonie tenet in eadem villa terciam partem j. feodi de Johanne de Reyngny per medium, et ipse de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Ricardus Baucan tenet dimidium feodum in Northon' de Thoma Juells, et ipse Thomas de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Ricardus de Veteri Ponte tenet in Brawode, in Bradeford, Middelcoth', et in More j. feodum et dimidium et quartam partem j. feodi de Reginaldo de Valle Torta, scilicet partem in capite et partem per medios de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Hospitalarii de Bocland' in Sumerset' tenent quartam partem unius feodi de eadem villa de Gileberto filio Stephani, et ipse Gilebertus de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Wido de Brettevil' tenet in Thrisselton' j. feodum de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Willelmus de Hywisse tenet unum feodum et quintam partem j. feodi in Stafford' de heredibus et honore de Toritone.

Et quod Johannes de Raddone tenet duo feoda in Raddono et Aureford' de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore de Tottonia.

Et quod Willelmus Trenchard' tenet duas partes j. feodi in Lywe et in Wadelestone de Johanne de Molls, et ipse de Johanne de Curtenay de honore de Okemeton'.

Et quod Willelmus de Arundel tenet iiij. partem j. feodi de Johanne de Molls in Orcherd' de predictis Johanne et honore.

Et quod Galfridus de Curiton' et Elias de Curiford tenent unum feodum in Curiton' de Laurencio filio Roberti, et ipse de Henrico de Tracy de honore Barnestapelle.

Et quod Johannes de Sicca Villa tenet in Spree dimidium feodum de Willelmo le Poure, et Willelmus de Ricardo de Langeford' et Ricardus de Galefrido de Mandevil', et ipse de comite Devonie de honore Plimtonie.

Item dicunt quod Andreas de Cancell' tenet manerium de Lifthon' in libero socagio de comite Ricardo Cornubie per servicium unius fibre thuris per annum ad festum Sancti Michaelis ad capellam de Berkehamested.

Et quod Comes Ricardus tenet manerium de Lideford' cum foresta de Derthemore de domino rege in capite per x.l. per annum.

Et quod abbas de Tavistok tenet in pura elemosina manerium de Oddetrewe de dono predecessorum Radulfi de Alba Mara de honore de Plimton'.

In libro.

Inquisicio feodorum et tenementorum in hundredo de Wyrig facta per sacramentum Roberti de Sideham, Roberti de Campellis, Roberti

758 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

le Copener, Willelmi Vassal, Radulfi de Derth', Galfridi de Fayreby, Luce de Bere, Rogeri Fromund', Thome de Tidderedun', Johannis le Despenser, Petri de Pillefenne et Roberti le Marchant.

Qui dicunt quod heres Rogeri filii Pagani tenet in Wyrig' dimidium feodum et x. partem unius feodi de heredibus Willelmi Brywerre, et ipsi de comite Devonie de honore de Plimthon.

Et quod heredes Alexandri de Crues tenent in Morceth j. feodum de domino et honore de Braneys.

Et quod Radulfus de Sicca Villa tenet in Putingthon' dimidium feodum de eisdem domino et honore.

Et quod Johannes le Despenser tenet in Wolfaresworth', Piddelegh' et Blakegrave j. feodum de comite Devonie de honore de Plimton'.

Et quod Henricus de Yaldestane tenet in Cunb' cum terra Thome de Yaldestane dimidium feodum de domino et honore de Braneys.

Et quod Herebertus de Pinu tenet in Wasseford' et in Sideham tres partes dimidii feodi de comite et honore Glovernie.

Et quod Simon' de Chartray tenet in Thelebrig et in Chatemere prioria Barnestapolie j. feodum de Henrico de Tracy de honore Barnestapolie.

Et quod Ricardus filius Bernardi tenet in Wolvrington' dimidium feodum de eisdem Henrico et honore.

Et quod Willelmus de Wolvringthon' tenet in Wolvrington' et Weveston' j. feodum et iiij. partem j. feodi de heredibus et honore de Toretone.

Et quod Willelmus Vassallus tenet in Fremannecoth' iiij. partem j. feodi de Willelmo de Clavil' de honore Glovernie.

Et quod Johannes le Despenser tenet in Drayford' iij. partes dimidu feodi de eisdem Willelmo et honore.

Et quod Willelmus Calleweye tenet in Chedeldon' in hundredo predicto et in Yedescoth' v. partes j. feodi de honore Glovernie per medios.

Et quod Ricardus de Chedeldon' tenet in Estchedeldune x. partem j. feodi de Willelmo Callewey, et ipse de Johanne de Curtenay de honore de Okemeton'.

Et quod [1] del Ospital tenet in Le Ospital et in Hamptenesford' Rogeri Cole terciam partem j. feodi in manerio de Chaumelegh' de predictia Johanne et honore.

Et quod Robertus de Stoddune tenet in Kadebyre de eodem manerio vtam partem j. feodi de Ivone de Servinthon', et ipse de eisdem Johanne et honore.

Et quod Galiena de Bonevileston' tenet in Bonevileston' viij. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Et quod Henricus de Goreland' tenet in Goreland' viij. partem j. feodi de Willelmo Fauvel, et Willelmus de eisdem.

Et quod Rogerus Fromund et Robertus de Benelegh' tenent in Shytelesbere et in Worthy iiij. partes dimidii feodi de eisdem manerio et honore per medium.

Et quod Hugo de Baylekeworth' tenet sextam partem j. feodi in Baylekeworth' de Roberto del Estane de eisdem manerio et honore.


[1] Supply Willelmus.

DEVON. 759

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et quod Rogerus Cole tenet in Hamptenesford' x. partem j. feodi per medios de eisdem manerio et honore.

Et dicunt quod Johannes de Curtenay tenet residuum predicti manerii in dominico pertinens ad baroniam suam de Okemeton'.

Et quod Rogerus de Dockeworth' et Martinus Faber tenent in Dockeworth' cum terra Roberti del Estane dimidium feodum de Ricardo le Breth', et ipse per medios de comite Devonie et honore. de Plimton'.

Et quod Ricardus le Copenere tenet in Romundeslegh' tres partes j. feodi de abbate de Tavistok' per medios.

Et quod Galfridus de Northecoth' tenet dimidium feodum in Waudam de eodem abbate per medios.

Et quod Nicholaus Avenellus tenet in Mausard' j. feodum de Johanne de Curtenay per medios de honore de Okemeton'.

Et quod Willelmus le Brun et Gilebertus Buteporth' tenent in Uppecoth' et in Buteporth' xij. partem j. feodi de Waltero de Nymeth' per medium, et ipse de episcopo Exoniensi.

Et quod Alanus Basseth' tenet in La Chapele cum terra Roberti de Horthon' j. feodum de Hugone Peverel de Sanford', et ipse de episcopo Exoniensi de manerio suo de Nimethon'.

Et quod Galfridus de Fayreby tenet in Turkerig dimidium feodum de eisdem episcopo et manerio.

Et quod Simon' de Gerardeston' tenet in Gerardeston' per med' dimidium feodum de eisdem episcopo et manerio.

Et Radulfus de Doddescum' tenet in Raweston' xiij. partem j. feodi de eisdem per medios.

Et quod Walterus de Nimeth' tenet in Kippingescoth' vj. partem j. feodi de eisdem manerio et episcopo.

Et dicunt quod episcopus tenet residuum predicti manerii de Nimethon' in dominico pertinens ad episcopatum suum.

Et quod Henricus de Yerd' tenet in Yerd' dimidium feodum de Johanne de Curtenay de honore de Okemethon'.

Et quod Radulfus de Esse tenet in Esse terciam partem j. feodi de eisdem Johanne et honore.

Et quod Robertus de Sideham tenet in Rakeneford' j. feodum de predictis Johanne et honore, set tenet medietatem feodi per medium.

Et quod heredes Osberti de Baggestane tenent in Baggestane iiij. partem j. feodi de Nicholao le Bastard', et Nicholaus de honore de Plimton'.

Et quod Willelmus de Tracy tenet in Bradeford' per medios dimidium feodum de honore de Braneis.

Et quod heredes Ivonis de Servinthon' tenent in Spreweye dimidium feodum de Galfrido de Mandevil'.

Et quod heres Robert Grede tenet in Spreweye dimidium feodum de Willelmo de Tracy, et Willelmus de Henrico de Tracy de honore suo Barnestapolle.

Et quod Jurdanus filius Rogonis tenet in Wodeburne et in Westapse j. feodum de Johanne de Curtenay de honore suo de Okemeton'.

Et quod Rogerus de Middelton' tenet in Middelton' viij. partem j. feodi de heredibus Willelmi Brywerre de honore de Braneis.

760 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et quod Robertus de Campell' tenet in Eatstodlegh j. feodum de Henrico de Tracy de honore Barnestapolle.

Et quod Robertus de Campell' junior tenet in Westetodlegh dimidium feodum de predicto Roberto de Campell', et ipse per medium de honore de Bery.

Et quod Radulfus de Doddescumb' tenet in Refthon' dimidium feodum de Roberto de Edingthon', et ipse de heredibus et honore de Torithon'.

Et quod Rogerus Dacastre tenet in Warebrigthelegh', Blackesworth' et in Whytecnolle iiijtam partem j. feodi de Galfrido de Mandevil', et ipse de Radulfo de Doddescumb' de honore Plimtonie.

Et quod Henricus de Dune tenet in Derth' dimidium feodum heredibus et honore de Toriton'.

Et quod Radulfus de Derth' tenet in Derth' quintam partem j. feodi de Juele de Valle Torta, et Juel de honore de Plimton.

Et quod Robertus de Edingthon' tenet in Norththecoth' et Kolteston' et in uno ferlingo terre in Bradelegh' quod est in hundredo de Twiverton' quartam et duodecimam partem j. feodi de Henrico de Tracy per plures medios de honore Barnestapolle.

Et Radulfus de Holebrok' tenet in Stordeton' iiij. partem j. feodi de Ricardo Hereward', et ipse [1] per medium de heredibus et honore de Torithon'.

Et prior Barnestapolle et Robertus de Horthon' tenent in Wasford' et Westecoth' et in Derth' ij. feoda de eisdem heredibus et honore.

Et quod Rogerus Dacastre tenet in Cunb' dimidium feodum de Galfrido de Mandevil', et Galfridus de Henrico de Tracy de honore Barnestapolle.

Et quod Johannes de Reygni tenet in eadem villa dimidium feodum de eodem Galfrido et eodem honore.

Et quod Walterus Herewy, Rogerus et Hugo de Odethone tenent in Odethon' viij. partem j. feodi de Roberto de Horthon', et Robertus per medios de honore de Plimton'.

Et quod Petrus filius Baldewini tenet in Wodeburne terciam partem j. feodi de Roberto de Legh' de eodem honore.

Et quod Johannes le Despenser tenet in Hille et in Throucumb' cum uno ferllngo terre in Bradelegh' quod est in hundredo de Twiverton' sextam partem unius feodi de Rogero Dacaatre, et Rogerus per plures medios de heredibus et honore de Torithon'.

Et dicunt quod Willelmus de Moncellis tenet in Cunbe sextam partem unius feodi de Henrico de Tracy de honore suo de Barnestapol'.

Item dicunt quod Rogerus de Praulle tenet Denewoldesham in socagio de heredibus de Tikeenbraz in Cornubia pro una libra cimini per annum, nullum faciens scutagium.

Et quod Rogerus de Munecheneland' tenet Munecheneland' de priorissa de Polleslo pro x.s. per annum in socagio, et ipsa in pura et antiqua elemosina.


[1] De inserted in error.

DEVON. 761

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et quod eadem priorissa tenet Bradeford' in dominico similiter in elemosina.

Et quod Rogerus Cole tenet Wik in manerio de Chalmelegh de priore de Christi Ecclesia pro lx.s. per annum, et prior in elemosina de Ivone Martel, et est de honore de Okemeton' et fuit antiquitua dimidium feodum.

Et quod Rogerus Cole tenet Coleton' in soccagio de Johanne de Curtenay per xx.s. per annum, et est de honore predicto.

Et quod Willelmus la Zuch' tenet Nimeton' de Alano la Zuch' in dominico, nullum faciens servicium, et Alanus de domino rege in capite.

Et quod Willelmus de Mohun tenet manerium de Marinelegh' de Reginaldo de Mohun', nullum faciens scutagium, et est de honore de Plimton'.

Et quod Robertus de Sideham tenet Parvam Rakeneford' de Ospitall de Bothemescumb' pro ij.s. per annum in soccagio, et est de honore Glovernie.

Et quod Herebertus filius Mathei tenet manerium de Hakeford' de Reginaldo de Mohun' pro vij.s. per annum in soccagio, et est de honore de Braneis.

Et quod prior de Pilton' tenet Seyntemarilegh' in pura elemosina de dono antecessorum Henrici de la Pomeray de honore de Bery.

Et quod Robertus de Bykelegh' tenet Parvam Wassefeld' de heredibus Willelmi Brywerre in soccagio pro uno arcu de aubume et duabua sagittis per annum, et est de honore Plimtonie.

Et quod Robertus de Ringatanesdune tenet Ringatanesdune de Johanne filio Ricardi in soccagio pro v.a. per annum de honore de Gunnardeston' in Cornubia.

Et dicunt quod idem Robertus tenet Oddeworth' per medium de Roberto Pictavenai in soccagio reddendo Ricardo Praech', qui medius est inter eos, duos denarios per annum pro omni servicio, et est de honore de Bery.

Devon. In libro.

Inquisicio facta in hundredo de Buddelegh' in comitatu Devonie de feodis et tenementia ibidem existentibus per sacramentum Johannis de Stokkelegh', Johannis Teobald', Tholomei de Oteringthon', Rogeri le Poer, Henrici Teobaldi, Alexandri Wyther, Thome de Granteland', Juliani de Fernlegh', Willelmi de Ferndon', Gileberti del Estane, Willelmi de Cotteford' et Eadmundi de Coletthon'.

Qui dicunt quod Radulfus de Welinthon' tenet manerium de Langelegb' et Braderig' per servicium j. feodi de comite Devonie de honore de Plimton'.

Et quod Baldewinus de Raddun' tenet in Raddon' ij. partes j. feodi de Galfrido de Mandevil' de feodo de Morethoin, et Galfridus de domino rege in capite.

Et quod idem Baldewinus tenet terciam partem j. feodi in La Furse de heredibus de Torithon' et de honore de Torithon'.

762 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et quod Robertus Pictavensis tenet in Crye et Denescumb' j. feodum de heredibus et honore de Bery.

Et quod Willelmus de Helihun tenet in Crydihelyhun' sextam partem j. feodi de Roberto de Helihun, et Robertus de honore de Plimthon'.

Et quod Willelmus Loud et Stephanus de Hassok' tenent sextam partem j. feodi in Hassok' de Henrico de Karevil', et Henricus de honore Henrici de Tracy de Barnestaple.

Et quod Gilebertus Anglicus tenet dimidium feodum de Morthoin in Stockelegh' de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore suo de Tremethon'.

Et quod'Robertus de Sicca Villa tenet in Sutthon'. [1]

Et quod Thomas de Santhon' tenet tres partes j. feodi in Churithon' de heredibus et honore de Torithon'.

Et quod Robertus de Horthon' tenet Addebir' per servicium tercie partis j. feodi quod fuit antiquitus dimidium feodum de heredibus et honore de Bery.

Et quod Walterus de Thwangelegh' tenet viij. partem j. feodi in eadem villa de Thwangelegh' de Roberto de Pidekeswill', et Robertus de honore et heredibus de Torithon'.

Et quod Unfridus de la Shethe tenet iiij. partem j. feodi in La Shete de Henrico de Yerde, et Henricus de Johanne de Curtenay de honore de Okemethon'.

Et quod Willelmus le Abbe tenet in Waasefeld iij. partem j. feodi de Muriele de Bollay, et ipsa de. [1]

Et quod Ricardus de Worth' tenet in La Worth' dimidium feodum de Juele de Valle Torta, et Juel' de comite Devonie de honore suo de Plimthon'.

Et quod Ricardus de Lumene tenet in Giddesham j. feodum de Radulfo de Wylinthon', et Radulfus de honore Glovernie.

Et quod Rogerus le Poer tenet in Rapelinghegh' dimidium feodum de Ricardo de Lumene, et Ricardus de honore de Bery.

Et quod abbas de Donekewill' tenet in eadem Rapelinghegh' dimidium feodum de Willelmo de la Lund' de honore de Braneis.

Et quod Wimundus de Ralegh', abbas de Dunekewill', et Radulfus Springham tenent duas partes j. feodi in Colethon' de Patricio de Chaworces [2] de Nicholao de Merieth, et Nicholaus de domino rege in capite.

Et quod Michael de Suthcoth' tenet in Staford' et Ayllnewod' xxxij. partem unius feodi de Hereberto filio Mathei, et ipse de domino rege in capite.

Et quod Rogerus le Poer tenet in Yethemeton' viij. partem j. feodi de Johanne de Curtenay de honore de Okemethon'.

Et quod idem Rogerus tenet in Blakebergh' x. partem j. feodi de comite Devonie de honore suo de Plimthon'.

Et quod Willelmus Hyricun' tenet dimidium feodum in Daledich' de Johanne de Curtenay de honore suo de Okemethon'.


[1] This entry seems to be unfinished. There is a blank in the MS.
[2] Supply et ipse.

DEVON. 763

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et quod Willelmus de Clavil' tenet in Wydicumb' iiij. partem j. feodi de comite Glovernie.

Et quod Reginaldus de Alba Mara tenet j. feodum in Wodebyre de domino rege in capite.

Et quod heredes Gileberti le Blund tenent in Clist Sancte Marie dimidium feodum de Roberto de Helihun', et ipse de comite Devonie de honore suo de Plimthon'.

Et quod Radulfus de Sicca Villa et prior Sancti Jacobi tenent in Clist et Creulegh' j. feodum de Henrico de Tracy de honore suo de Bernestapol'.

Et quod Henricus de Holebrok' tenet in Holebrok' j. feodum de Gileberto de Unfranvil' de honore comitis Glovernie.

Et quod Willelmus de Grindeham tenet dimidium feodum de feodo de Mortoyne in Halebrok de Waltero de Esselegh', et Walterus de domino rege in capite.

Et quod Ricardus filius Radulfi tenet in Ferndon' terciam partem j. feodi de heredibus Willelmi de la Bruere, et ipsi de honore comitis Devonie in Plimthon'.

Et quod heres Ade de Ferndon' tenet in Ferndon' viij. partem de feodo de Mortoyn de Simone de Littlethon', et Simon de Waltero de Eslegh', et Walterus de rege in capite.

Et quod Henricus de la Hille et Willelmus de Exton' tenent in La Hille et Exton' dimidium feodum de Roberto de Okeaham, et Robertus de honore de Bery.

Et quod Willelmus de Aston' tenet in Boystok' sextam partem j. feodi de Nicholao de Meryeth, et Nicholaus de domino rege in capite.

Et quod Ricardus de Hokeaham tenet in La Ford vj. partem j. feodi de heredibus W. Brywer', et ipsi de honore comitis Devonie de Plimthon'.

Et quod Henricus de Yaldestane tenet in Yaldestane de Willelmo de la Lunde domino de Braneis de honore de Braneis.

Et quod Johannes Teobald' tenet in Rokebere dimidium feodum de Rogero Giffard', et Rogerus de honore de Okemethon'.

Et quod heres Baldewini de Beleestane tenet de Ricardo de Langeford' in Rokebere et in Dodingthon' j. feodum, et Ricardus de honore de Hokemethon'.

Et quod Henricus de Ralegh' tenet j. feodum in Strete de Galfrido de la Pomeraye, et Galfridus de honore et heredibus de Bery.

Et quod Johannes de Curtenay tenet in Ayleabere dimidium feodum de honore suo de Okemethon' de domino rege in capite.

Et quod heredes Baldewini de Beleestane tenent in La Hegland de Willelmo de Legh' de feodo de Morthonie terciam partem j. feodi de baronia de Odecumb' de parte Patricii de Chawrces.

Item dicunt quod decanus et capitulum de Rotomago tenent manerium de Otery Sancte Marie de dono regum in pura elemosina, nullum facientes servicium regale.

Et quod Augustinus de Poghehill' tenet Poghhill' in Ubero soccagio pro uno pari cirotecarum per annum de Katerina de Monte Acuto de baronia de Cheselbergh'.

764 A.D. 1242-12.43.

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et quod heredes Henrici de la Pomeraye tenent Stokkelegh' in dominico de honore suo de Bery, nullum inde facientes regale.

Et quod Johannes de Stokelegh' tenet Stockelegh' in soccagio de Waltero de Baggepuz pro centum solidis, et idem Walterus de Katerina de Monte Acuto, et ipsa de domino rege in capite de honore de Cheselbergh'.

Et quod abbas de Monte Sancti Michaelis in Britannia tenet maneria de Oteringthon', Sidemue, Hetherland' et Wonbogh [1] in pura elemosina de dono regum.

Et quod capitulum Exonie tenet maneria de Sidebire, Saltcumb', Bere et Hynethon' de dono regum in pura elemosina.

Et quod Johannes de Furneus tenet in Fenotery unam hidam terre de domino rege in soccagio per annum pro iiij.l. iiij.s. et viij.d.

Et quod prior de Dynam tenet Harepeford' et Nutewill' in pura elemosina de Galfrido de Dinam, et Galfridus de domino rege in capite, nullum inde faciena regale.

Et quod abbas de Sireburn' tenet Littleham de dono regum in pura elemosina.

Et quod prior Sancti Nicholai Exonie tenet Bradeham in elemosina de dono regum.

Et quod Radulfus Ballatarius tenet Bukethon' de domino rege pro custodia gaole Exonie.

Et quod Reginaldus de Albamara tenet Leueneston' de Muriel' de Bollay, et ipsa de domino rege in capite per servicium unius servientis eques inveniendi cum uno arcu et v. sagittis quando rex venatur in foresta de Dertemore.

Et quod heredes Hillarii Blundi tenent Clistwyk' de Galefrido de la Pomeraye in soccagio pro xxij.a. per annum, et Galfridus de domino et honore de Braneis.

Et dicunt quod Herebertus filius Mathei tenet Huntebere in dominico de domino rege in capite, nullum inde faciens regale.

[Endorsed:-] Buddelegh et Sancte Marie Oterii.

In libro.

Inquisitio feodorum et tenementorum in hundredo de Sta[nbergh facte per sacramentum Willelmi] [2] de Morlegh', Johannis de Alba Mara, Henrici de Altaribus, Willelmi de Bradelegh', Willelmi [filii Acel] [2] ini, Nicholai de Widemore, Ricardi Crespin, Radulfi de Beumes, Alani de Boltebire, Henrici de Stoktun', Johannis de Radewull' et Galefridi de la Ya.

Qui dicunt quod Willelmus de Sancto Stephano tenet in Uveredene j. feodum et viij. partem j. feodi de Nicholao filio Martini de baronia de Dertingthon'.

Et quod prior de Plimthon' tenet in Nitheredene tres partes dimidii feodi de eodem Nicholao et eadem baronia.


[1] Read Bodlegh.
[2] Supplied from I.827.

DEVON. 766

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et quod Johannes de Fenthon' tenet vicesimam partem j. feodi de eodem Nicholao et eadem baronia in manerio de Dertingthon' quod idem Nicholaus tenet in dominico in capite baronie sue.

Et quod Jurdanus de Hode tenet in Hode terciam partem j. feodi et in Walleworth' dimidium feodum de eodem Nicholao et eadem baronia.

Et quod Jurdanus Bamage tenet in Loscumb' dimidium feodum de eodem Nicholao et eadem baronia.

Et quod Willelmus Hericun' tenet in Morlegb' dimidium feodum de eodem et eadem.

Et quod Henricus de Altaribus tenet in Luscumb' v. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Et quod idem Henricus et Durandus filius Ricardi tenent in Boys j. feodum de eisdem.

Et quod abbas Sancti Dogmaelis in Walfia tenet in Whytekesdone iiij. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Et quod Willelmus de Hurbemeford' tenet in Hurbemeford' dimidium feodum de eisdem.

Et quod Nicholaus le Bastard' tenet in Herewaldesore iiij. partem j. feodi de comite Devonie de honore de Plimthon'.

Et quod Alanus de Boghedune tenet in Pollekesthon' iij. partem j. feodi de Reginaldo de Valle Torta per medios de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Galfridus de Insula tenet in Legh' iiijtam partem j. feodi de Willelmo de Clavil' de honore Glovernie.

Et quod Radulfus de Alba Mara tenet unum feodum in Wodelegh' de comite Devonie de honore Plimthonie.

Et quod Willelmus de Morlegh' tenet j. feodum in Morlegh' et in Starrig de Nicholao Avenell', et ipse de comite Devonie de honore Plimtonie.

Et quod Johannes de Alba Mara tenet dimidium feodum in Hywiase de Muriele de Bollay, et ipsa de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Johannes de Rak' tenet j. feodum in Surlegh' et in Rak' et in Alwineston' de Wydone de Brettevil' de parte Reginaldi de Valle Torta honoris Tottonie.

Et quod heres Petri de Baddestane tenet unum feodum in Baddestane de Reginaldo de Valletorta de honore suo de Tremethon' in Cornubia.

Et quod Rogerus de Praulle tenet iiij. partem j. feodi in Colethon' de Willelmo de la Pomeraye, et ipse de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Robertus Buzun' tenet unum feodum in Sure de Willelmo Buzun, et ipse de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Robertus de Bello Campo tenet quartam partem j. feodi de Moret' in Boltebir' de Willelmo de Monte Acuto.

Et quod Alanus de Boltebir' tenet dimidium et sextem partem j. feodi in Boltebir' de feodo de Moreton' de Radulfo le Rua, et ipse de honore de Cardinan in Cornubia.

Et Gilebertus filius Stephani tenet in Gaumethon' de Willelmo de Cantilupo j. feodum de honore Tottonie.

766 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et quod Baldewinus de Wayford' et heredes Radulfi le Abbe tenent j. feodum de Roberto Folyoth, et ipse Robertus de comite Devonie de honore Plimtonie.

Et quod Gilebertus filius Stephani tenet unum feodum in Hywis et in Bocland' de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Willelmus Buzun' tenet j. feodum in Therlestane de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Radulfus de Beumes tenet dimidium feodum in Bagkethon' de Willelmo Piparth', et ipse de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Ricardus Crespin tenet dimidium feodum in Wolatingthon' de Willelmo de la Pomeraye, et ipse de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Johannes de Alba Mara tenet dimidium feodum in Courtescnolle de Muriele de Bollay, et ipsa de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Willelmus et Adam de Bradelegh' tenent j. feodum in Bradelegh' de Muriele de Bollay, et ipsa de predicto Willelmo de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Adam Bernard' et heredes Radulfi de Uppeton' tenent dimidium feodum in Uppeton' de Willelmo Piparth', et ipse de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Willelmus de Bradelegh' et Ricardus de Cumb' tenent iiij. partem j. feodi in Cumb' de Nicholao Bastard', et ipse de comite Devonie de honore de Plimthon'.

Et quod Ricardus de Benlegh' tenet j. feodum in Benlegh', unde Nicholaus de Molis tenet v. ferlingoa terre, et ipse ix. ferlingos de Radulfo de Alba Mara de honore de Plimton'.

Et quod Johannes de Arundel tenet iiij. partem j. feodi in Hach' per plures medios de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Wydo de Bretthevil' tenet unum feodum in Porlemue de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore Tottonie.

Et dicunt quod Girardus de Spineto tenet unum feodum in Yedelthone de Wydone de Brettevil', et ipse de Reginaldo de Valletorta de honore Tottonie.

Item dicunt quod Nicholaus filius Martini tenet manerium de Northamme in dominico pertinens ad manerium suum de Dertington' quod est caput baronie sue nullum inde faciens regale.

Et quod abbas de Cameis tenet Rattre in pura elemosina de dono antecessorum Nicholai filii Martini, nullum inde faciens servicium.

Et quod Odo de Treverby tenet Allyngthon' de baronia Andree de Cardinan in Cornubia, nullum inde faciens servicium.

Et quod Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet manerium de Lodeswill' in dominico, pertinens ad baroniam suam de Tottonia.

Et Matheus Besille tenet manerium de Alfington' quod fuit eschaeta domini regia de terra Oliveri Daubengny de dono domini regis, reddendo per annum Nicholao de Molls ad manerium suum de Depeford' xxvj.s. et inveniendo ei unum bedellum ad hundredum suum de Stanbergh'.

DEVON. 767

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et dicunt quod abbas de Bufestre tenet maneria de Bufestre et Churechestowe et Brenth' de domino rege in pura elemosina.

In libra.

Inquisitio facta in hundredo de Haytor de feodia et tenementia per sacramentum Michaelis de Spichewik, Martini de Fisacre, Roberti de Morcellis, Roberti de Punchardun', Willelmi Pace, Rogeri de Kokinthon', Johannis le Cnigth', Stephani de Bokeyeth', Roberti de Penillez et Rogeri de Punchardun':-

Qui dicunt quod Thomas de C[ir]encestre tenet j. feodum in Wodehywis de Thoma de la Haulle, et Thomas de Andrea de Cardinan de honore de Cardinan in Cornubia de feodis de Moretoine.

Et quod Wido de Reftercumb' tenet in Reftercumb' v. partem j. feodi de predicto Thoma de feodis de Moretoin' de predicto honore.

Et quod Willelmus Buzun tenet in Churechetone j. feodum de Reginaldo de Valletorta de honore Tottonie.

Et dicunt quod Robertus de Penilles tenet in Lughaton' dimidium feodum per plures medios de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Robertus de Morcellis tenet in Goderington', Ledwycheton' et in Bruneston' j. feodum de Galfrido de Mandevil' de honore de Merswod'.

Et dicunt quod heredes Henrici le Deneis tenent in Colethon' j. feodum de episcopo Exoniensi per plures medios.

Et quod Willelmus Do tenet in Aleburne j. feodum de eodem episcopo per plures medios.

Et quod Martinus de Fisacre tenet unum feodum in Aleburne, Wodeton' et in Dynenthon' quod est in hundredo de Mouthon' et in Rauleston' quod est in hundredo de Wyrig', et in Morewale in Cornubia, que est v. para jus feodi de eodem episcopo.

Et quod Radulfus de Doddescumb' tenet dimidium feodum in Cumthon' de eodem episcopo.

Et quod Willelmus de Stontorre tenet dimidium feodum in Stontore de eodem episcopo.

Et quod Johannes de Arundel tenet dimidium feodum in Lovenetorre de eodem episcopo.

Et quod Martus [1] de Sanderig' tenet iij. partem j. feodi in Sanderig' de eodem episcopo.

Et quod Wido de Brionne et Jacobus de Vado tenent iij. partem j. feodi in Hemeston' Chatard de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie.

Et quod [2] Robertus de Penilles et Ricardus le Breth' tenent j. feodum in Bakeford' de comite Devonie per plures medios de honore de Plimthon'.

Et quod Rogerus de Punchardon' tenet dimidium feodum in Cumb' de Willelmo de Cantilupo per plures medios de honore de Tottonia.


[1] Read Martinus.
[2] Et quod repeated.

768 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et quod [1] Radulfus de Sancto Amando tenet dimidium feodum in Ipelepen et Gaumethon', quod Robertus de Punchardun' tenet de eo, de domino rege in capite.

Et quod Wido de Brionne tenet j. feodum in Torre et in Weston' de Johanne de Curtenay de honore suo de Okemethon'.

Et quod Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet ij. feoda in Hemmeston' de feodis de Moretone, set nescitur utrum de domino rege in capite vel de comite Cornubie.

Et quod Henricus de Sparkewlll' tenet dimidium feodum in Sparkewill' de Johanne de Curtenay per plures medios de honore de Okemethon'.

Et quod Michael de Spichewik' tenet j. feodum in Spychewik' de Johanne de Nova Villa de honore de Stok Curcy.

Et quod Johannes filius Johannis tenet uj. partem j. feodi in Nottesworth' de feodo de Moretoin de Andrea de Cardinan de honore de Cardinan in Cornubia.

Et quod Rogerus de Bokland' tenet j. feodum in Bocland' et Cherleton' de comite Devonie per plures medios de honore de Plimton.

Et quod Johannes filius Ricardi tenet unam virgatam terre in Blakedon' de Hugone de Bollay, et ipse de Johanne de Curtenay per servicium dimidie marce solvende eidem semper quando scutagium currit, quocumque modo detur; et hoc condicione facta inter eos.

Et quod Johannes de Luvenetor' tenet dimidium feodum de Willelmo de Cantilupo per plures medios de honore de Tottonia.

Et quod Ricardus Folloth' tenet in Welles dimidium feodum de comite Devonie de honore de Plimton'.

Et quod Rogerus de Cokinthon' tenet j. feodum et vj. partem j. feodi in Cokinthon' de Nicholao filio Martini de honore suo de Dertingthon'.

Et quod Thomas de Cyrencestre tenet iiij. partem j. feodi in Seintemarichurch de feodia de Moretoine de Andrea Cardinan de honore de Cardinan in Cornubia.

Et quod abbas de Torre tenet in Daccumb' ij. feoda per plures medios de abbate de Tavistok'.

Et quod Stephanus de Haccumb' tenet iij. partem j. feodi in Hascumb' de Johanne de Curtenay de honore de Okemethon'.

Et quod Johannes le Barun' tenet dimidium feodum de domino de Braneis et de honore de Braneis.

Et dicunt quod Ricardus filius Radulfi tenet iiij. partem j. feodi in Widecumb' de comite Devonie de honore de Plimton' per plures medios.

Et dicunt quod abbas de Torre tenet Woluebergh' in pura elemosina de heredibus Willelmi de la Bruere, et ipsi de Johanne de Curtenay de honore de Okemeton', et quod fuit prius j. feodum.

Et quod Willelmus de Baggetorre tenet j. feodum in Aure de heredibus Rogeri filii Pagani de comite Devonie de honore Plimtonie.


[1] Et quod repeated.

DEVON. 769

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et quod Martus [1] de Fisacre tenet j. feodum in Colethon'de Hereberto filio Mathei, et Herebertus de Reginaldo de Valletorta de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Nicholaus de Molis tenet dimidium feodum in Carawill' et Depeford' de domino rege in capite.

Item dicunt quod Willelmus de Mohun tenet Torre Brywere de Alicia de Mohun, et ipsa de comite Devonie de honore de Plimton', nullum inde faciena servicium.

Et Reginaldus de Valle Torta tenet manerium de Brixham de domino rege in capite de honore Tottonie, nullum inde faciena servicium.

Et quod episcopus Exoniensis tenet manerium de Peinthon' similiter in dominico pertinens ad episcopatum suum.

Et quod heredes Henrici de la Pomeraye tenent manerium de Beri in dominico de domino rege in capite, nullum facientes servicium.

Et quod Johannes de Arundel tenet Hemmeston' Bubba de comite Cornubie in socagio per servicium l.s. per annum solvendorum apud Landestaveston'.

Et quod decanus et capitulum Exonie tenent manerium de Staverthon' in pura elemosina de dono regum.

Et quod abbas de Tavistok' tenet manerium de Devenebyr' in dominico de baronia sua de Tavistok', nullum inde faciens servicium.

Et quod abbas de Sireburn' tenet manerium de Kareawill' de dono regum in pura elemosina.

Et dicunt quod decanus et capitulum Exonie tenent manerium de Pafford' in pura elemosina de dono regum.

In libro.

Inquisicio facta de feodis et tenementis in hundredo de Erminthon' per sacramentum Galfridi de Pridias, Johannis de Silvestane, Willelmi de Bykebur', Gileberti de Addestane, Willelmi With', David' de Erminton', Walteri de Mymyland', Thome de Dunstaneston', Ricardi le Clerk, Walteri de Fenthon'. Gileberti Crespini et Rogeri de Halegwill'.

Qui dicunt quod Willelmus de Atrio tenet j. feodum in Langeford' de Reginaldo de Mohun, et ipse de rege in capite.

Et quod Willelmus de la Pomeraye tenet vj. partem j. feodi in Baterford' de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore Tottonie.

Et Radulfus Ruffus tenet j. feodum de Moreton' in Luperig' de Hereberto filio Mathei, et ipse de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore de Tremeton'.

Et Willelmus de Tuzseinz tenet iiij. partem j. feodi in Luperig' de Ricardo de Lumene de honore Glovernie.

Et quod Walterus Giffard' tenet j. feodum in Avethon' de comite Devonie de honore de Plimthon.


[1] Read Martinus,

770 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et Willelmus de Bykebyr', tenet j. feodum in Bykebyr' et unum feodum in Hugheton' de Willelmo Buzun', et ipse de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore de Tremeton' de feodis de Moreton'.

Et quod idem Willelmus tenet terciam partem j. feodi in Halewill' et in Nottedone de eodem Reginaldo et eodem honore.

Et quod Juelis de Valle Torta tenet dimidium feodum in Cumb' de eodem feodo et honore.

Et quod Gilebertus filius Stephani tenet j. feodum et dimidium in Ridmore de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Galfridus de Pridias tenet unum feodum in Orcherdton' de manerio de Modbyre, quod manerium Reginaldus de Valletorta tenet in dominico de domino rege in capite de baronia sua de Tremeton'.

Et quod Hugo Peverel tenet dimidium feodum in Cumb' Spridel de eisdem feodo, manerio et honore.

Et quod Robertus Fort Escu tenet j. feodum in Wymundeston' de eisdem feodo, honore et manerio.

Et dicunt quod Stephanus de Ludebrok' tenet ij. feoda et v. partes j. feodi in una et altera Ludebrok' in Baucumb', Dynenton' et in Yedmareston' de eisdem feodo, manerio et honore.

Et quod Johannes de Alba Mara tenet in Flethe, et in Bikecumb', et in Wardeslegh', que sunt in hundredo de Wyrig', j. feodum de Radulfo de Alba Mara de honore de Plimton', et erant prius ij. feoda.

Et quod Gilebertus Crespin tenet j. feodum et iiij. partem j. feodi in Lamside et Alnedeston' de Willelmo de Cantilupo per medios de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Walterus de Mymyland' tenet dimidium feodum in Mymyland' de predicto Willelmo et honore Tottonie.

Et quod Radulfus Ruffus tenet j. feodum in Parva Modbyr' de Hereberto filio Mathei, et ipse per medios de honore de Cardinan in Cornubia.

Et quod heredes Henrici le Deneys tenent j. feodum in Kalsingthon' de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Willelmus de Ferariis tenet j. feodum de feodis de Moreton' in Niweton' et in Poselinch' de honore Reginaldi de Valle Torta de Tremethon'.

Et quod Herebertus filius Mathei et Hugo de Foresta tenent in Worthyhele j. feodum de Reginaldo de Valle Torta de honore Tottonie.

Et quod Wydo de Brettevil' tenet j. feodum in Legh' de predicto Reginaldo et predicto honore.

Et quod idem Wydo tenet in Comwod' et in Luttathon' j. feodum et iiij. partem j. feodi de feodis de Moret' de Willelmo de Ferariis de honore de Tremeton'.

Et quod Hugo Peverel tenet duas partes j. feodi in una et altera Hereford' de Gileberto Anglico de honore de Tremeton' de feodis de Moret'.

Et Walterus de Fenthon' tenet j. feodum in Bradeford' et in Fenton' de Wydone de Brettevil', et ipse per medios de eisdem feodis et honore.

DEVON. 771

S.ij.21.I.815-836 - cont.

Et quod Margeria filia Stephani tenet j. feodum in Pek' per medios de eisdem feodis et honore.

Et quod Warinus filius Juelis tenet j. feodum in Ferthedel de eisdem feodis [1] honore per plures medios.

Et quod Hugo Peverel tenet in Erminton', in Kingeston', Habothun' et in Killebyre j. feodum de comite Devonie de honore de Plimthon'.

Et quod Alicia de Mohun tenet in Uggabergh' j. feodum de comite Devonie de honore de Plimton'.

Et quod Ricardus Baucan tenet quartam partem j. feodi in Uvereblachesworth' de Willelmo de Cantilupo per medios.

Et Walterus Tremeneth' tenet quartam partem j. feodi de Nicholao le Bastard' in Nythereblachesworth', et ipse de comite Devonie de honore de Plimton'.

Et quod Radulfus de Stodbyre tenet in Stodbire quartam partem j. feodi de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore Tottonie per medium.

Et quod Johannes de Alba Mara tenet quartam partem j. feodi in Brunardeston' de feodis de Moret' de Godefrido de Craucumb'.

Item dicunt quod Johannes de Silvestane tenet Silvestane de Odone de Treverby in soccagio per xx.s. per annum de honore de Cardinan in Cornubia.

Et dicunt quod abbas de Bufestre tenet maneria de Hethfeld'tone et Battekesbergh' et Esse in pura elemosina de antiquo dono regum.

In libra.

S.ij.21.I.765-777.

FEODA COMITATUS DEVONIE INQUISITA PER PRECEPTUM DOMINI REGIS ANNO XXVII.

Feoda Henrici de Tracy de Honore Barnestapolie.

Willelmus Favellus tenet in Pilland' cum Boldringthon' j. feodum de Henrico de Tracy.

Heredes Radulfi de Bray tenent in Morthcho dimidium feodum de eodem.

Radulfus Morin et heredes Willelmi de Culumbariis tenent in Dune de eodem per medios duas partes j. feodi de eodem.

Mabilia de Dune tenet in Aylyvecoth' de eodem per medium duas partes unius feodi.

Radulfus de Pynu tenet in Crakeweye de eodem per medium quartam partem unius feodi.

Heredes Galfridi de Trendeleslo tenent in Trendeleslo et in Sevenasse j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Nicholaus de Ferariis et Robertus de Incledene tenent in Incledene j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Willelmus de Bykelegh' et Thomas Terry tenent in Northecoth' et Kamescoth' ij. partes j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Ricardus de Byttedene tenet in Bittedene j. feodum de eodem per medium.


[1] Supply et.

772 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.765-777 - cont.

Simon de Chartray tenet in Bere cum membris j. feodum de eodem.

Willelmus de Ralegh' tenet in Ralegh' et Chaudecumb' j. feodum de eodem

Robertus de Moredone et Simon de Molland' tenent in Estbokland' j. feodum de eodem.

Adam et Robertus de Medeneford' tenent in Medeneford' xxj. partem de eodem per medium.

Robertus de Pidekewill' tenet in Pidekewill' et in Gratedene j. feodum de eodem.

Heredes Ade de Barnevil' tenent in Middelton' j. feodum de eodem.

Hamelinus de Deudone tenet in Bridewyk' iij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Abbas de Clive tenet in Walleworth' iij. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Stephanus de Sancto Albino tenet in Mattingho j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Robertus de Sideham tenet in Kynewauthon' iij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Walterus Dar tenet in Whytefeud iij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Willelmus Pauvel tenet in Rughelegh' dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Robertus de Bolkeworth' tenet in Stodelegh' dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Robertus de Pidekewill' tenet in Parva Bray dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Walterus de Reyngny tenet in Pleystowe j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Baldewinus le Flemeng tenet in Hautebray j. feodum et dimidium de eodem per medium.

Thomas de Berkelay tenet in Eatebray iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Oliverus de Tracy tenet in Bremelrig et in Sudaure j. feodum de eodem.

Robertus Furlang tenet in Cloteworth' xiiij. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Robertus de Campell' tenet in Molland' dimidium feodum de eodem.

Rogerus le Moyne tenet in Anestye j. feodum de eodem.

Galfridus de Dunheve et Willelmus Avenell' tenent in Esse ij. feoda de eodem.

Henricus de Merthon' tenet in Merthon' et in Suttecumb' ij. feoda de eodem.

Robertus de Horthon' tenet in Horthon' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Willelmus le Cornu tenet in Hengestecoth' iij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Johannes et Thomas de Baldringthon' tenent in Westbaldringthon' iiijtam partem unius feodi de eodem per plures medios.

Thomas de Santon' tenet in Bokland' et in Hertlegh' j. feodum de eodem.

DEVON. 773

S.ij.21.I.765-777 - cont.

Hugo de Chageford' tenet in Chageford' et in Yales ij. feoda et dimidium de eodem.

Alexander de Clunny tenet in Bugheberg' unum feodum de eodem per medium.

Simon Lampree tenet in Weathorewod' tres partes j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Robertus et Adam de Tappelegh' tenent in Tappelegh' unum feodum de eodem per medium.

Rogerus Beupel tenet in Hywiase j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Simon de Chartray tenet in Wolvrington' j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Ricardus de Hydon' tenet in Hengestecoth' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Willelmus Cusin et Elias de Cumb' tenent in Wanteslegh' et in Emberlegh' vicesimam et quadragesimam partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Simon de Chartray tenet in Thelebrig' et in Chatemere j. feodum de eodem.

Ricardus filius Bernardi tenet in Wolvringthon' dimidium feodum de eodem.

Heres Roberti Grede tenet in Spreweye dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Robertus de Campellis tenet in Bonelegh', Estodlegh' et in Hamptenesford' ij. feoda de eodem.

Robertus de Edingthon' tenet in Northecoth', Coltescoth', Bradelegh' quartam et duodecimam partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Rogerus Dacastre et Johannes de Reyngny tenent in Cumb' j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Willelmus de Moncellis tenet in Cumb' Munceus vj. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Radulfus de Sicca Villa tenet in Curig j. feodum de eodem.

Abbas de Quarera tenet in Forewod' dimidium feodum in pura elemosina de dono antecessorum predicti Henrici de Tracy, et nullum inde facit scutagium.

Robertus de Blakeford' tenet in Rewe cum una virgata terre in Sulfertone unum feodum de eodem.

Heres Ricardi le Espek' tenet in Branford' dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Thomas de Blakeford' tenet in Kouelegh' dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Phelippus Taleboth' tenet in Surethon' et in Trissel in Meleford', Kemmeworth', Niweland' et in Thome ij. feoda de eodem per medium.

Galfridus de Curiton' et Elias de Curiford' tenent in Curiton' j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Ricardus de Crues tenet in Nytheresse j. feodum de eodem.

Henricus de Tracy tenet in Uppe Esse dimidium feodum in dominico.

Thomas de Padehill' tenet in Padehill' dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

774 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.765-777 - cont.

Robertus Avenel tenet in Lockesbere j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Robertus de Blakeford' tenet in Hlakeford' j. feodum de eodem.

Willelmus Lud et Stephanus de Hassok' tenent in Hassok' vj. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Radulfus de Sicca Villa et prior Sancti Jacobi tenent in Clist et in Creulegh' j. feodum de eodem.

Rogerus de Putteford' et Reginaldus de la Medlak' tenent in Parva Bovy dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Phelippus de Bello Monte tenet in Wolflegh' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Radulfus de Alba Mara tenet in Bovy et in Alenesford' xx. partem j. feodi.

Summa lij. feoda et iiijta et xxma pars unius feodi.

In rotulo. Tot' Barnestap'.

Feoda de Toriton'.

Hamel' Hereward' tenet in Doddelescoth' dimidium feodum de heredibus de Torithon'.

Ricardus de Whytefeld' tenet in Bykanthon' dimidium feodum de eisdem.

Galfridus de Hach' tenet in Bokland' dimidium feodum de eisdem per medium.

Willelmus de Wolvrington' tenet in Wolvringthon' et in Wevezston' j. feodum et quartam partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Radulfus de Doddescumb' tenet in Refthon' dimidium feodum de eisdem.

Henricus de Dune tenet in Derth' dimidium feodum de eisdem.

Radulfus de Holebrok' tenet in Stordethon' iiij. partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Prior de Barnestapol et Robertus de Horthon' tenent in Wasford', Westecoth' et in Derth' ij. feoda de eisdem.

Johannes le Despenser tenet in Hille et in Throucumb' cum uno ferlingo terre in Estbradelegh' vj. partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Thomas de Santon' tenet in Santon' dimidium feodum de eisdem.

Robertus de Edinthon' tenet in Hamme j. feodum de eisdem.

Robertus de Pidekewill' tenet in Hamme, Sprecumb', Hole et in Thaungelegh' unum feodum de eisdem.

Eustacius de Merewod' tenet in Westecoth' dimidium feodum de eisdem per medium.

Philippus Pulayn tenet in Braylegh' dimidium feodum de eisdem per medium.

Heres Ricardi Beupel' tenet in Fytelecoth' iiij. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Hawisia de Aure tenet in Aure de eisdem dimidium feodum per medium.

Willelmus de Wolvrinton' tenet in Hach' dimidium feodum de eisdem.

DEVON. 776

S.ij.21.I.765-777 - cont.

Ricardus de Spekcoth' tenet in Spekcoth' dimidium feodum de eisdem per medium.

Willelmus de Hywis tenet in Hywis, Wyddene et in La Walle j. feodum et iiijor partes unius feodi de eisdem.

Robertus filius Pagani et Nesta uxor eius tenent in Ullecumb', Blylhemesham et Wollecumb' unum feodum de eisdem.

Willelmus de Wideworth' tenet in Wideworth' j. feodum de eisdem.

Rogerus de Hele et Willelmus de Hilderesdon' tenent in Hilderesdon' dimidium feodum de eisdem, et fuit antiquitus unum feodum integrum.

Thomas de Santon' tenet in Honesham dimidium feodum de eisdem.

Simon de Depeford' tenet in Depeford' j. feodum de eisdem.

Willelmus de Wolvrinton' tenet in Baddekesworth' iiijam partem j. feodi de eisdem.

David de Wydeworth' tenet in Cumb' dimidium feodum de eisdem, et fuit antiquitus feodum integrum.

Reginaldus Beupel, Rogerus Giffard', prior de Frythelarestok' tenent in Melleford', Hole et Herdeswik ij. feoda de eisdem.

Walterus de Morthon' tenet in Almereston' cum membris j. feodum de eisdem per medium.

Radulfus Sarazenus tenet in Molland' dimidium feodum de eisdem.

Baldewinus de Raddon tenet in La Furse terciam partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Thomas de Santon' tenet in Churiton' iij. partes j. feodi de eisdem.

Walterus de Thauangeslegh' tenet in Twangeslegh' viij. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Willelmus de Hywis tenet in Staford' j. feodum et quintam partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Summa xxiiij. feoda et dimidium et tres partes dimidii feodi.

In rotulo. Toriton'.

Feoda Reginaldi de Valletorta.

Tottonia. Manerium de Clauton'.

Willelmus Pe de levre tenet in Kymethorne xl. partem j. feodi de Reginaldo de Valletorta de honore Tottonie in manerio de Clauton'.

Ricardus filius Johannis tenet in Fernhille xl. partem j. feodi de eisdem Reginaldo, manerio et honore.

Johannes de Rem tenet in More, Kiletre, Blakedone. Tynacre et in Frenecoth' j. feodum et quartam partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Ricardus de Winescoth' tenet in Winescoth' iiij. partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Rogerus Sayer, Adam Clericus, Ricardus filius Martini et Oresia Crok tenent in Loveworth terciam partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Robertus Clericus tenet in Byestedone xx. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Tottonia.

Nicholaus de Fernhille tenet in Fernhille j. feodum de predicto Reginaldo de eodem honore Tottonie per medium.

776 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.765-777 - cont.

Gilbertus Anglicus tenet in Brigaton' j. feodum de eisdem per medium.

Willelmus de Haleghewelle tenet in Haleghewell' iij. partem i. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Thomas Joelis tenet in Dune ij. partes j. feodi de eisdem.

Wido le Breth' tenet in Stottecumb' dimidium feodum de eisdem.

Prior de Plimton' tenet in Saghe ij. partes j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Idem prior tenet in Sireford' ij. partes j. feodi de eisdem.

Ricardus de Cynnok' tenet in Chychebergh' iij. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Wido le Breth tenet in Waleford' et in Stoddon iij. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Johannes de Alba Mara tenet in Tavy iiij. partem j , feodi de eisdem.

Idem Johannes tenet in Sideham et in Waghefen j. feodum et ij. partes j. feodi de eisdem.

Mauricius de Sideham tenet in Parva Sideham ij. partes j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Ricardus Baucan tenet in Northon' dimidium feodum de eisdem per medium.

Wido de Brettevd' tenet in Thrysselthon' j. feodum de eisdem.

Ricardus de Veteri Ponte tenet in Brawod', Bradelegh', [1] Middelcoth', et in La More j. feodum et quartam partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Willelmus de la Pomeray tenet in Buterford' vj. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Herbertus filius Mathei et Hugo de Foresta tenent in Worthyel unum feodum de eisdem.

Wido de Brettevil' tenet in Legh' j. feodum de eisdem.

Ricardus de Mewy tenet in Mewy dimidium feodum de eisdem per medium.

Hugo Peverel tenet in Weston' j. feodum de eisdem per medium.

Willelmus Buzun tenet in Legham et in Manedone iiij. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Petrus de Alnedeston' tenet in Whytelegh' dimidium feodum de eisdem.

Agustinus de Courig tenet in Courig iiij. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Walterus Pomeray tenet in Godemewy dimidium feodum de eisdem per medium.

Ricardus de Mewy tente xl. partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Idem Ricardus tenet in Gropeton' iij. partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Willelmus Buzun tenet in Churechethon' j. feodum de eisdem.

Martinus de Fisacre tenet in Kolethon' j. feodum de eisdem per medium.

Alanus Bughedon' tenet in Pollekeston' terciam partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Johannes de Rak' tenet in Surlegh', in Rak', et in Alwyneston' j. feodum de eisdem per medium.


[1] Read Bradeford as on p. 757.

DEVON. 777

S.ij.21.I.765-777 - cont.

Rogerus de Praulle tenet in Colethon' iij. partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Robertus Buzun tenet in Sure j. feodum de eisdem.

Willelmus Buzun tenet in Thurlestane j. feodum de eisdem.

Ricardus Crespin tenet in Wolsingthon' dimidium feodum de eisdem per medium.

Johannes de Arundel tenet in Hach' iiij. partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Wido de Brettevil' tenet in Porlemue j. feodum de eisdem.

Girardus de Spineto tenet in Ydelthon' j. feodum de eisdem per medium.

Gilbertus Crespin tenet in Stonecumb' dimidium feodum de eisdem per medium.

Idem Gilbertus tenet in Aylington' j. feodum de eisdem per medium.

Robertus le Bastard tenet in Thuryalegh' vj. partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Durandus filius Ricardi tenet in eadem vj. partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Ricardus Crespin tenet in Burgh' dimidium feodum de eisdem per medium.

Willelmus de la Pomeray tenet in Bergh' xvj. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Manerium de Cliston'.

Willelmus de Clyst tenet in Kildringthon' quod est de manerio de Cliston' dimidium feodum de eodem Reginaldo, et ipse de rege.

Martinus Rof tenet in Suthwymple dimidium feodum de eisdem Reginaldo et manerio.

Johannes de Sicca Villa tenet in Brokhille viij. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Unfridus de Lymbyr' tenet in Lymbyr' iij. partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Johannes de Arundel tenet in Bere iiij. partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Robertus de Morcellis tenet in Sudthbrok' dimidium feodum de eisdem per medium.

Reginaldus de Auney tenet in Craneford' iiij. partem j. feodi de eisdem per medium.

Unfridus le Mansel tenet in Kynewardeabergh' xx. partem j. feodi de eisdem.

Feoda eiusdem de manerio de Hurberthon'.

Ricardus le Bygod tenet in Hurberneford' dimidium feodum de eodem, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus Baucan tenet in Wasseburne de eodem manerio iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Ricardus de Estcote tenet in eodem manerio xx. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Willelmus Crocre tenet in Crockethon' xx. partem j. feodi de eodem.

778 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.765-777 - cont.

Heredes Henrici de Sopecumb' tenent in Sopecumb' xx. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Nicholaus de la Ya tenet in Hounne Erguileys xx. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Willelmus Buzun tenet in Houne viij. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Jurdanus de Hode tenet in Hele xl. partem j. feodi de eodem.

In rotulo.

Feoda de Honore Glovernie.

Hugo de Loges tenet in Bukinthon' viij. partem j. feodi de comite Glovernie per medium.

Johannes de Reyngny de Edwislegh' tenet in Esse unum feodum de eodem de parte Comitis Ricardi. Breve.

Henricus de Nuny et Matillis uxor eius tenent in Dugheland' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Ricardus de Lumene tenet in Ridelcumb' et in Northecoth' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Rogerus Cole tenet in Lullardeston' dimidium feodum et viij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Baldewinus Lovel et Robertus Pollard tenent in Godwynescoth' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Johannes Burnellus et Simon Lamperie tenent in Notteston' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Walterus le Lou tenet in Merdesnymeth' et in Bradeford' iij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Herbertus de Pinu tenet in Wasford' et in Sideham iij. partes dimidii feodi de eodem.

Johannes le Despenser tenet in Drayford' iij. partes dimidii feodi de eodem per medium.

Willelmus Vassallus tenet in Fremanescoth' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Willelmus Calleweye tenet in Chedeldun' et in Yedescoth' v. partes j. feodi de eodem.

Wermundus de Portu Mortuo tenet in Halecumb' dimidium feodum de eodem de parte Comitis Ricardi. Breve.

Henricus Gurant tenet in Wynkelegh' dimidium feodum de eodem de parte eiusdem.

Henricus de Tracy tenet ibidem j. feodum de eodem et parte eiusdem per medium.

Heres Oliveri de Campo Ernulphi tenet in La Burch' et in Sudthcoth' dimidium feodum de eodem et parte eiusdem.

Johannes, Nicholaus et Walterus de Calecoth' tenent ibidem iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem et parte eiusdem. Breve.

Herbertus filius Mathei tenet in Chedelhampton' j. feodum de eodem.

Nicholaus de Bolevill' et Avicia uxor eius tenent in Lyu et in Haleghewill' j. feodum et dimidium de eodem de parte Comitis Ricardi, set non faciunt modo nisi unum feodum. Breve.

Heres Ricardi de Greinvill' tenet in Bydeford' dimidium feodum de eodem de parte eiusdem. Breve.

DEVON. 770

S.ij.21.I.765-777 - cont.

Henricus et Reginaldus de Buleworth' tenent in Boleworth' et in Coldethorn viij. partem unius feodi de eodem per medium de parte eiusdem. Breve.

Comes Ricardus tenet in dominico unum feodum in Langetre de eodem honore pro defalta servicii heredum de Corithon'. [1]

Willelmus de Hampteneford' tenet in Haleyslond', Dynesbere et in Childedon' dimidium feodum de eodem.

Walterus Hamelyn, Robertus Russel et Johannes de Chageford' tenent in Feldefen dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Johannes de Reyngny tenet in Edwislegh' et in Uppecoth' ij. feoda de eodem de parte Comitis Ricardi. Breve.

Robertus Pollard' tenet in Lovelleston' viij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Heres Luce Tremeneth' et Ricardus de Speckoth' tenent in Esse et La Hille iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Ricardus de Whyteslegh' tenet in Whytefeld vj. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Elyas Basset tenet in Steveneston' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Simon de Bosco tenet in Duddecoth' viij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Henricus de Tracy tenet in Nywethon' iij. partes dimidii feodi de eodem per medium.

Johannes de Sancto Johanne tenet in Jonestowe iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Reginaldus de Mohun tenet in Fareweye dimidum feodum de eodem per medium.

Ricardus Fomicun tenet in Clist Fomicon' dimidium feodum de eisdem [1] per medium.

Angnes de Esford' tenet in Steveneston' et in quadam parte de Couelegh' et in Yendecoth' terciam partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Willelmus de Boyvil' et Anestasia uxor eius tenent in Wogewill' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Radulfus filius Bernardi tenet in Holecumb' j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Heres Johannis de Melewis, Simon Lamperee et Hugo de Loges tenent in Churiton' et Wolgareston' dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Elianor de Hause tenet in Tryfebel dimitfium feodum de eodem per medium.

Heredes Willelmi le Barun tenent in Alricheston' dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Robertus de Sicca Villa tenet in Colm Reyngny dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Willelmus de Wodebere tenet in Wodebere, in Esse et in Brigeford' j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Willelmus et Willelmus de Bosco tenent in Haberton' j. feodum de eodem.


[1] Read Torithon'.
[2] Read eodem.

780 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.765-777 - cont.

Teobaldus de Engleschevil' tenet in Woberneford' j. feodum de eodem per balliam domini regis de parte Comitis Ricardi. Breve.

Willelmus de Clavil' tenet in Bordlescumb', Sureapeldor' et in Behille j. feodum de eodem.

Angnes de Esford' tenet in Esford' terciam partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Abbas de Donekewill' tenet in Lynor dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Galfridus Gambun tenet in Moriston' dimidium feodum de eodem per medium de parte Comitis Ricardi. Breve.

Willelmus Callewey tenet in Mukelebere et in Sweteton' j. feodum de eodem per medium de parte eiusdem. Breve.

Radulfus Buty tenet in Legh' dimidium feodum de Morthon' de eodem per medium.

Willelmus de Manelegh' tenet in Manelegh' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Johannes Lancelevee et Robertus Avenel tenent in Cumb' et in Morlegh' j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Ricardus de Lumene tenet in Lumene et Whytenech' j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Willelmus de Clavill' tenet in Lomene et in Cadewill' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Simon Lamperee tenet in Fenacre iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Willelmus de Colehegh' tenet in Marlecumb' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Willelmus de Tuz Seynts tenet in Loperig' iiij: partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Galfridus de Insula tenet in Legh' quartam partem j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Rogerus Giffard tenet in Clovely unum feodum de eodem per medium de parte Comitis Ricardi.

Willelmus de Hamptenesford' tenet in Wolfarysworth' dimidium feodum de eodem.

Willelmus de Bykelegh' tenet in Northpole et in Colemore j. feodum de eodem per medium.

Thomas de Wodemaneston' tenet in Wodemaneston' viij. partem j. feodi de eodem per medium,

I.777-778. [1]

Willelmus de Tuz Seynta tenet quartam partem j. feodi in Bocland' de eodem per medium.

Willelmus de Clavill' tenet in Wydecumb' iiij. partem j. feodi de eodem.

Henricus de Holebrech' tenet in Holebrok' unum feodum de eodem per medium.

Feoda Abbatis de Tavistok'.

Galfridus de Northecoth' tenet in Northecoth' dimidium feodum de abbate de Tavistok'.


[1] A membrane of the roll (S.ij.21) is missing.

DEVON. 781

I.777-778 - cont.

Ricardus le Copener tenet in Romundeylegh' uj. partes j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Galfridus de Northecoth' tenet in Wodham dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Alanus de Haldesworth' tenet in Hauekedon' duodecimam partem unius feodi de eodem per medium.

Ricardus Passemer tenet in Panneston' et in Kary vij. partes j. feodi de eodem.

Willelmus le Comu tenet in Thombir' ij. partes unius feodi de eodem.

Willelmus de Legh' tenet in Branford' dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Mabilia de Bole worth' tenet in Boleworth' quartam partem unuis feodi de eodem per medium.

Wido le Breth' et Willelmus le Brok' tenent in Langebere et in Mannesford' quartam partem unius feodi de eodem per medium.

Robertus Hereward' tenet in Fislegh' et abbas de Tavistok' in Hanebergh' una cum Creubere dimidium feodum.

Abbas de Tarre [1] tenet in Daccumb' et in Welles duo feoda de eodem per medium.

Ricardus de Hundetorre tenet in Hundetorre dimidium feodum de eodem per medium.

Radulfus Gurdeth' tenet in Childeton' dimidium feodum de eodem.

Alicia de Campell' tenet in Legh' unum feodum de eodem.

Amadas de Wyk' tenet in Wyk', in Okbere et in Hauesworth' unum feodum de eodem.

Burnard filius Rogeri tenet in West Lidethon' quartam partem unius feodi de eodem per medium.

Rogerus Bouedon tenet in Foghauer, Poghelippe et in Herdewill quartam partem unius feodi de eodem.

Feoda Nicholai filli Martini de Baronia de Dertingthon'.

Rogerus de Lokington' [2] tenet in Lokington' [2] unum feodum et sextam partem unius feodi de eodem Nicholao.

Willelmus de Sancto Stephano tenet in Overdene unum feodum et octavam partem unius feodi de eodem.

Prior de Plynton' tenet in Nitheredene iij. partes dimidii feodi de eodem.

Johannes de Fenton' tenet in Dertingthon' xx. partem unius feodi de eodem.

Jurdanus de Hode tenet in Hode terciam partem unius feodi et in Walleworth' dimidium feodum de eodem.

Jurdanus Damage tenet in Lascumb' dimidium feodum de eodem.

Willelmus Hericun tenet in Merlegh' dimidium feodum de eodem.

Henricus de Altaribus tenet in Luscumb' quintam partem unius feodi de eodem.

Idem Henricus et Durandus filius Ricardi tenent in Boys unum feodum de eodem.


[1] Read Torre [2] Read Cokington'.

782 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.777-778 - cont.

Abbas Sancti Dogmaelis tenet in Whittekesdon' quartam partem j. feodi de eodem.

Willelmus de Hurberneford' tenet in Hurberneford' dimidium feodum de eodem.

Willelmus filius Morie' tenet in Hakinton' unum feodum de eodem.

Stephanus le Poer tenet in Churchehille unum feodum de eodem.

S.ij.21.I.779-780.

Particularia feoda que tenentur de domino rege in capite

Robertus de Blakeford' tenet in Branton' j , feodum de eodem.

Willelmus Avenel tenet in Sepewasse ij. partes j. feodi de eodem.

Nicholaus Burdon' tenet in Teynton' j. feodum.

Reginaldus de Valle Torta et Alicia Basseth' tenent in Culiton' ij. feoda de Waltero de Dunstanvill', et ipse de domino rege. In rotulo. Breve.

Eadem Alicia tenet in Whyteford' j. feodum de rege.

Hugo Peverel tenet in Sanford' et in Aure iij. partes j. feodi.

Nicholaus Avenel tenet in Childeton' iij. partes j. feodi.

Willelmus del Estre tenet in Langeford' j. feodum de Reginaldo de Mohun, et ipse de rege.

Radulfus de Sancto Amando tenet in Ipelepenne et in Gaumeton' dimidium feodum. In rotulo. Breve.

Nicholaus de Molis tenet in Karswill' et in Depeford' dimidium feodum. In rotulo. Breve.

Michael de Suthcoth' tenet in Staford' et in Ayfinewode xxxij. partem unius feodi de Hereberto filio Mathei, et ipse de rege. In rotulo. Breve.

Robertus de Merland' tenet in Wollecumb' ij. partes tercie partis j. feodi pertinentis ad Horcherdlegh' in Sumerset' quod idem Robertus tenet de rege.

Reginaldus de Alba Mara tenet in Wodebyre j. feodum de eodem.

Galfridus Dynanth' tenet in Hertiland' ij. partes j. feodi.

Particularia feoda quorum capitales honores sunt in aliis comitatibus.

Willelmus de Ralegh' tenet in Auvrington' j. feodum de Phelippo de Culumbers, et ipse de rege.

Thomas de Orweye tenet in Orweye dimidium feodum de eodem.

Willelmus Male Erbe tenet in Fineton' et Wamberneford' iij. feoda de Moretoyn de Willelmo de Monte Acuto, et ipse de rege.

Johannes et Ricardus de Cherleton' tenent in Cherleton' viij. partem j. feodi de Moretoyn de Waltero de Esselegh' in Sumerset,' et ipse de rege.

Robertus Ryvel tenet in Clist Ewelme vj. partem j. feodi de Nicholao de Mereyeth'.

Phelippus Corbyn tenet in Stenenhalle vj. partem j. feodi de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore de Worle in Sumerset', et ipse de rege.

Robertus de Bello Campo tenet in Boltebyre iiij. partem j. feodi de Moreton' de Willelmo de Monte Acuto.

DEVON. 783

S.ij.21.I.779-780 - cont.

Heredes Willelmi de Boterellis tenent in Mollond' j. feodum de Radulfo de Mortemer de honore de Wygemore in Hereford'.

Rogerus le Butor tenet in Matteford' ix. partem j. feodi de Moretoin per medium de Willelmo de Monte Acuto.

Abbas de Dunekewill', Wimundus de Ralegh' et Radulfus Springham tenent in Colethon' ij. partes j. feodi de Nicholao de Meryeth' per medium.

Willelmus de Grindeham tenet in Holebrok' dimidium feodum de Moretoin de Waltero de Eslegh' in Sumerset'.

Heres Ado de Ferndon' tenet in Ferndon' viij. partem j. feodi de Moretoin de codem Waltero, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus de Aston' tenet in Boystok' vj. partem j. feodi de Nicholao de Meryeth in Sumerset'.

In libra.

S.ij.21.I.780-792.

Feoda de Okeme[t]on' Johannis de Curtenay.

Rogerus Cole tenet in Hardewinesl[e]gh' dimidium feodum.

Thomas de Chenne tenet in Chenneston' iiijtam partem j. feodi.

Willelmus de Wray tenet in Wyk' iiijtam partem j. feodi.

Johannes de Regni tenet in Eggenesford dimidium feodum.

Johannes filius Rogeri et Joelus de Bosco tenent in La Heghe et in Pertricheswall iiijtam partem j. feodi.

Heres Ricardi le Espec tenet in Wemmewrth' et Brigheford ij. feoda.

Alanus de Hallesuurthe tenet in Cloveneburgh' iij. partes j. feodi.

Willelmus de Punchardun tenet in Waleston' et La Thome iiijtam partem j. feodi.

Johannes Burnel et Simon Laumpre tenent in Burdevileston' j. feodum.

Walterus de Nimet tenet in Nimet Rollandi, in Legh et in Bere j. feodum cum membris.

Elienor de Hause tenet in Hause dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Greneslade tenet in Greneslade iij. partem j. feodi.

Hugo de Niwelaunde tenet in Niwelaunde vjtam partem j. feodi.

Ada de Risford tenet in Bradenimet', in Apeldure et Niwetone j. feodum.

Ricardus de Chedeledune tenet in Chedeledune x. partem j. feodi.

Willelmus de Hospitali tenet in Le Hospital et in Hamtenesford iij. partem j. feodi.

Robertus de Stoddune tenet in Cadebire v. partem j. feodi.

Galiena de Bonevilestone tenet in Bonevilestone viij. partem j. feodi.

Henricus de Gorelaunde tenet in Gorelaunde viij. partem j. feodi.

Rogerus Fromund et Robertus de Benl[e]gh' tenent in Shitelesbere et in Wrthi quatuor partes dimidii feodi.

Hugo de Baylekewrth' tenet in Baylekewrth' vj. partem j. feodi.

Robertus de le Estane tenet in Stayne viij. partem j. feodi.

Rogerus Cole tenet in Hamtenesford x. partem j. feodi.

Nicholaus Avenel tenet in Mausard j. feodum.

784 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.780-792 - cont.

Henricus de Yerde tenet in Yerde dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Ease tenet in Esse iij. partem j. feodi.

Robertus de Sydeham tenet in Rakeneford j. feodum.

Jordanus filius Rogonis tenet in Wodeburne et in Westapse j. feodum.

Philippus de Bellomonte tenet in Asford j. feodum.

Heres Ricardi Beaupel tenet in Westesford dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Punchardun tenet in Hyaunton' et Hakynton' cum Blakewille iij. feoda.

Abbas de Dunekewull' tenet in Lincumb', Worcumb' et Middelmerwode ij. feoda.

Rogo filius Simonis tenet in Worcumbe v. partem j. feodi.

Heredes Oliveri de Campo Ernulfi tenent in Alfrincumbe j. feodum.

Walterus le Lou tenet in Kentesbir' j. feodum.

Nicholaus de Filelgh' tenet in Filelgh' dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Hokesham tenet in West Boclaunde j. feodum.

Nicholaus Avenel tenet in Snyddelg' dimidium feodum.

Philippus de Bellomonte tenet in Shirewill' j. feodum et dimidium.

Willelmus de Punchardune tenet in Charnes j. feodum.

Radulfus de Esse tenet in Anestye dimidium feodum.

Rogerus le Moyne tenet in Frodetone et in Westecot dimidium feodum.

Vincencius de Loliwill tenet in Niweton' et Weston' dimidium. feodum.

Heres Willelmi de Aubernun tenet in Bradeford viij. partem j. feodi.

Johannes de Molis tenet in Lechebrok', Dumeford, Yekesburne et in Hyauntone ij. feoda et dimidium.

Ricardus Cadyo tenet in Lewidecot', Cockescumb', Westecot' et in Rokewrth' j. feodum.

Heres Baldewini de Belestane tenet in Belestane dimidium feodum.

Ricardus filius Radulfi et Galfridus de Radeweye tenent in Herpeford et in Radeweye dimidium feodum.

Drogo de Teynton' tenet in Wythelgh' xx. partem j. feodi.

Ada de Risford tenet in Brigteneston' terciam partem j. feodi.

Willelmus de Legh', Walterus de Mimilaunde, Ada et Margeria de Hunichurche tenent in Hunichurch' j. feodum.

Ricardus de Langeford tenet in Munekeokementon' dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Kelly tenet in Brawode iij. partem j. feodi.

Petrus Corbin tenet in Corbineston' vj. partem j. feodi.

Heres Elie Coffin tenet in Inwardigh' et in Westecot j. feodum et iiijtam partem unius feodi.

Galfridus Coffin tenet in Cakeber' et in Craffte dimidium feodum.

Philippus Perer tenet in Gorehiwiss' dimidium feodum.

Heres Petri de Syrefuntayne tenet in Maddeford iiij. partem j feodi.

Ricardus Passemer tenet in West Pulewrth' x. partem j. feodi.

Lucya de Buredune tenet in Buredune x. partem j. feodi.

Philippus de Bello Monte tenet in Lancarse iiij. partem j. feodi.

DEVON. 785

S.ij.21.I.780-792 - cont.

Heres Baldewini de Belestane tenet in Parkeham ij. feoda.

Willelmus le Cornu tenet in Hunshaue dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Estaneston' tenet in Puderigh' j. feodum.

Rogerus Giffard tenet in La Meye j. feodum.

Radulfus de Wulledune tenet in Wulledune dimidium feodum.

Heres Willelmi de Aubernun tenet in Stockelg' dimidium feodum.

Johannes de Sicca Villa tenet in Yauntone dimidium feodum.

Willelmus et Alexander Tony [1] tenent in Toniton' [2] viij. partem j. feodi.

Robertus de Shete tenet in Cumb' dimidium feodum.

Johannes de Tril tenet in Smalecumb' et in Tril dimidium feodum.

Henricus de la Forde tenet in La Forde viij partem j. feodi.

Rogerus le Ver et Stephanus de Uffewille tenent in Suttecumbe vijtam partes jus feodi.

Willelmus de Colewill' tenet in Colewill' j. feodum.

Rogerus le Ver et Stephanus de Uffewill' tenent in Uffewill' j. feodum.

Herbertus de Pynu tenet in Braunford j. feodum.

Heredes Alexandri de Tauton tenent in Rollandeston' vj. partem jus feodi.

Johannes de Nevile tenet in Dunesford dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Bosco tenet in Matford viij. partem j. feodi.

Heredes Ricardi Cadyho tenent in Racumbe j. feodum.

Warinus filius Joelis tenet in Medenecumbe dimidium feodum de antiquo, set nunc nullum facit militare.

Petrus de la Pole tenet in Medenecumbe dimidium feodum.

Ricardus de Teyng tenet in Teing dimidium feodum.

Stephanus de Haccumbe tenet in Ridmore et in Clifford ij. partes jus feodi.

Heres Ingeram de Aubernun tenet in Teington iij. partes dimidii feodi.

Willelmus de Risford tenet in Risford iij. partes j. feodi.

Philippus Talebot tenet in Spreiton' cum membris j. feodum.

Idem Philippus tenet in Hutteneslgh' dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Kelly tenet in Eggebere et Buledune j. feodum.

Heredes Nicholai de Fuleford tenent in Fuleford dimidium feodum.

Heredes de Melehiwiss tenent in Melehiwiss j. feodum.

Thomas de Tetteburne tenet in Tetteburn' j. feodum et iiij. partem j. feodi.

Heredes Ricardi Cadiho tenent in Wallerig' dimidium feodum.

Henricus Guraunt tenet in eadem dimidium feodum.

Renerus de Halleham tenet in Calchurch iiij. partem j. feodi.

Radulfus de Alba Mara tenet in Westecot' et in La Hacghe j. feodum.

Ricardus de Langeford tenet in Wyk dimidium feodum.

Hamel' de Dyaudune, Walterus de Bathonia et Ricardus le Bret tenent in Brattone et in Cumbe et in Coddescot j. feodum.

Henricus Gubaut tenet in Alfardesdune dimidium feodum.


[1] The reading may equally be Tauy, Touy, or Tany.
[2] The reading may equally be Tauiton or Tamton.

786 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.780-792 - cont.

Robertus de Meledune tenet in Meledune vj. partem j. feodi.

Galfridus de la Hoke tenet in La Hoke vj. partem j. feodi.

Elias de Trempol tenet in Stockelgh' dimidium feodum.

Muriel' de Bolley tenet in Byrightestowe j. feodum.

Rogerus de Trelgh' tenet in Dunterdune j. feodum.

Willelmus de Kelly tenet in Kelli et in Medwill' j. feodum.

Willelmus Trenchard tenet in Lyu et in Wadeleston' iij. [1] partes j. feodi.

Willelmus de Arundel tenet in Orcherd iiij. partem j. feodi.

Rogerus Giffard tenet in Payhaumbir' et Segh'lak dimidium feodum.

Rogerus de Hele tenet in Hele j. feodum.

Henricus filius Henrici et heres Hugonis de Bolley tenent in Kentelesbere, Pauntesford' Kyngesford et in Catteshegh' iij. feoda.

Ricardus de Langeford tenet in Langeford dimidium feodum.

Oliva de Seghlak tenent in Seghlak x. partem j. feodi.

Willelmus de Chivethorn' tenet in Chivethorne dimidium feodum.

Alicia de Ros tenet in Certecumbe duas partes j. feodi.

Hugo de Bynnewill' tenet in Hackewrth' dimidium feodum.

Jordanus filius Rogonis tenet in Holecumbe j. feodum.

Ricardus de Hidune tenet in Hidune vj. partem j. feodi.

Herbertus de Pynu tenet in Culum j. feodum.

Jordanus filius Rogonis tenet in Nonicote dimidium feodum.

Abbas de Dunekewill' tenet in Bolleham terciam partem j. feodi.

Ricardus de Hidune tenet in Clist dimidiam feodum.

Wydo de Brianne tenet in Torre et in Weston' j. feodum.

Henricus de Sparkewill' tenet in Sparkewill' dimidium feodum.

Johannes filius Ricardi tenet in Blakedune per servicium dimidie marce semper pro scutagio quando currit.

Stephanus de Haccumb' tenet in Haccumb' iij. partem j. feodi.

Abbas de Torre tenet Wullebergh' in pura elemosina, et fuit prius j. feodum.

Ricardus Treimenet' tenet in Hyanac j. feodum.

Heredes Hugonis de Langedene tenent in Parva Maneton' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Robertus de Hyliun tenet in Nitheredune vj. partem j. feodi.

Reginaldus Bernehus tenet in Asmundeswrth' dimidium feodum.

Galfridus Vassal, Petrus de Asmundesuurth', et Willelmus de Strockeswrth tenent in Asmundeswrth' dimidium feodum.

Savaricus de Sarraunvile tenet in Parva Ernescumb' j. feodum.

Ricardus filius Alani tenet in Doddebrok' et in Porlemue et in Lamsede dimidium feodum et terciam partem j. feodi.

Rogerus de Praulle tenet in Praulle iiij. partes j. feodi.

Heres Willelmi de Bykebir' tenet in Engeleburne j. feodum.

Girardus de Spineto tenet in Teyng dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Hyliun tenet in Shaplgh' j. feodum.

Herbertus de Cumb' tenet in Jurdaneston' vjtam partem j. feodi.

Hugo Peverel tenet in Mammehavede j. feodum.


[1] Read ij.

DEVON. 787

S.ij.21.I.780-792 - cont.

Thomas et Reginaldus de Uppecot' et filius Galfridi de la Hok' tenent in Holecumb' et Uppecot dimidium feodum.

Osbertus le Bat tenet in Teigemue vj. partem j. feodi.

Unfridus de la Shete tenet in La Shete iiij. partem j. feodi.

Rogerus le Poer tenet in Yetematon' viij. partem j. feodi.

Willelmus Herizun tenet in Daledich' dimidium feodum.

Johannes Tebaut tenet in Rakebere dimidium feodum.

Heres Baldewini de Belestane tenet in Rakebere et in Dodeton' j. feodum.

Johannes de Curtenay tenet in Ailesbere dimidium feodum in dominico.

In rotulo totus. Breve.

Feoda Honoris de Plymthon' Comitis Devonie.

Robertus Burnel tenet in Cruk' j. feodum.

Heres Milonis Corbyn tenet in Brigeford', Hoke, Nyweton' et in Foldehegh' j. feodum.

Juel' de Valle torta tenet in Tauton' et in Alfeton' iiij. partem et xx. partem j. feodi.

Robertus de Stoddon tenet in Stoddon iij. partem j. feodi.

Heres Rogeri filii Pagani tenet in Wyrig' dimidium feodum et x. partem j. feodi.

Johannes le Despenser tenet in Wolfaresworth', Piddelegh' et Blakegrave j. feodum.

Rogerus de Dockeworth et Martinus Faber tenent in Dockeworth' cum terra Roberti del Estane dimidium feodum.

Heres Osberti de Bagestane tenet in Baggestane iiij. partem j. feodi.

Rogerus Dacastre tenet in Warebrightelegh', Blakeworth', et in Whytecnolle quartam partem unius feodi.

Walterus Herevy, Rogerus et Hugo de Odethon' tenent in Hodethon' viij. partem j. feodi.

Petrus filius Baldewini tenet in Wodeburne iij. partem j. feodi.

Radulfus de Derth' tenet in Derth' v. partem j. feodi.

Phelippus de Lobbe tenet in Lobbe dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Mullecoth' tenet in Mullecoth' dimidium feodum.

Ricardus de Whytefeld' tenet in Whytefeld' j. feodum et dimidium.

Henricus de Tracy et prior de Pilton' tenent in Churimerwod j. feodum.

Rogerus Giffard, priorissa de Cantingthon', et heres Willelmi Daubernun tenent in Godelegh j. feodum.

Phelippus de Bello Monte tenet in quadam parte de Syrewill' j. feodum.

Radulfus de Welinton' in Stokes iiij. partem j. feodi.

Robertus de Lughyngecot' tenet in Leghyngecoth' j. feodum.

Radulfus de Dune tenet in Bruge Ruardi j. feodum.

Walterus de Morthon' tenet in Churiputteford' j. feodum.

Radulfus de Alba Mara tenet in Thefebergh' et in Kystemeldon' j. feodum.

788 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.780-792 - cont.

Thomas de Treiago tenet in Giddecoth' dimidium feodum.

Willelmus Avenel tenet in Cukebyr', Stapeldon', Fagelefenne, Uppecoth' et in Halesdone iij. partes j. feodi.

Alexander de Heremanesdon' tenet in Wanford' dimidium feodum.

Matheus de Bello Monte tenet in Jonelegh' j. feodum.

Juelis Faber, Jurdanus de Fenton' et Hugo le Sak' tenent Middelcoth vj. partem j. feodi.

Phelippus Perer tenet in Scobbechestre iij. partem j. feodi.

Robertus le Brok' tenet in Radeclive iiij. partem j. feodi.

Heres Roberti le Brok' et persona de Lyu tenent in Kemppebere tres partes unius feodi.

Isabella Bloyho et Gilbertus de Langeford' tenent in Beghworthy et in Mellebir' dimidium feodum.

Walterus Giffard tenet in Were, Holnam et in Polam j. feodum.

Ricardus de Crues tenet in Parva Toriton' dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Wyfinton' tenet in Beuford' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Rogerus Giffard, Willelmus Lampree, et Thomas de Aureford' tenent in Hele j. feodum.

Johannes Goding tenet in Hele xl. partem j. feodi.

Willelmus del Chenne tenet in Twykkebere ij. feoda.

Rogerus le Mareschal tenet in Petermerland j. feodum cum membris.

Radulfus de Alba Mara tenet in Westlegh' j. feodum.

Radulfus de Dune tenet in Dune vj. partem j. feodi.

Robertus de Helyhun' tenet in Whytelegh' dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Bulkeworth' tenet in Sutthon' cum La Hille abbatis de Quarera dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Dune tenet in Wyk' vj. partem j. feodi.

Johannes Capy et Willelmus de Aqua tenent in Membyr' viij. partem j. feodi.

Sarra de Asselegh' tenet in manerio de Toppesham xx. partem j. feodi.

Robertus Whiperel tenet ibidem viij. partem j. feodi.

Bertholomeus de Pultimor tenet in Pultimor j. feodum.

Willelmus de Baggetorre tenet in Baggetorre j. feodum.

Juelis de Bukethon' tenet in Sygeford' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Rogerus de Stapelhille tenet in Stapelhille dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Holebem tenet in Holebem dimidium feodum.

Unfridus de Dune tenet in Estwogewill' dimidium feodum.

Reginaldus de Albo Monasterio tenet in Racumb' j. feodum.

Heres Rogeri filii Pagani tenet in Stokes cum una et altera Gabewill' dimidium feodum.

Galfridus de Worth' tenet in Silvestane iij. partes j. feodi.

Fulco de Ferers tenet in Throulegh' dimidium feodum.

Prior de Plymton' tenet in Parva Lampford' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Johannes de Hakeworth' tenet in Hakeworth' dimidium feodum.

Ricardus Tremeneth' tenet in Hywisse dimidium feodum.

Alexander de Heremannesdon' tenet in Heremannedon' j. feodum.

Radulfus de Bykeford' tenet iiij. partem j. feodi.

Willelmus le Abbe tenet in Alfamescoth' j. feodum,

DEVON. 789

S.ij.21.I.780-792 - cont.

Nicholaus le Bastard tenet in Gosewill' dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Chalun tenet in Legh' v. partem j. feodi.

Warinus filius Juelis, Juel' de Bukethon' et Rogerus de Direhille tenent in Wyvelesworth', Stondon' et in Burydon' j. feodum.

Walterus Giffard tenet in Lamerthon' j. feodum.

Radulfus de Esse tenet in Collecumb' et in Willestre j. feodum.

Robertus de Crues tenet in Bradestane dimidium feodum.

Johannes de Sicca Villa tenet in Spree dimidium feodum.

Aubrea de Boterellis tenet in dote dimidium feodum.

Nicholaus de Greneslingh' tenet in Greneslinch' j. feodum.

Johannes de Hakeworth' tenet in Welebere iiij. partem j. feodi.

Nicholaus de Burne tenet in Burne dimidium feodum.

Philippus de Furnellis tenet in Suthwod' et Niweland' dimidium feodum.

Walterus de Padekebrok' tenet in Paddekebrok' xxx. partem j. feodi.

Robertus filius Pagani tenet in La Kove et in Mere unum feodum.

Robertus de Morcellis tenet in La Mere viij. partem j. feodi.

Thomas le Paumer tenet in Leuerlegh' v. partem j. feodi.

Robertus de Legh' tenet in Legh' ij. partes j. feodi.

Antonius de la Pole tenet in La Pole iiij. partem j. feodi.

Robertus Mauduth' tenet in Nochecoth' v. partem j. feodi.

Johannes de Culm tenet in Colm dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Clist tenet in Clist et in Brighteneston' iij. partes j. feodi.

Walterus Giffard tenet in Aveton' j. feodum.

Johannes de Alba Mara tenet in Flethe, in Bykecumb' et in [1] Wardlegh j. feodum.

Hugo Peverel tenet in Erminton' cum membris j. feodum.

Alicia de Mohun tenet in Uggebergh' j. feodum.

Walterus Tremeneth' tenet in [Nythere] Blachesworth iiij. partem j. feodi.

Robertus Folioth' tenet in Tawy unum feodum.

Walterus Giffard' tenet in Whytecherch' j. feodum.

Girardus de Spineto tenet in Sanford' j. feodum.

Herbertus de Cumb' tenet in Sytelestorre dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Cilterne tenet in Lovyeton' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Heres Isabelle Giffard' tenet in Eckebocland', in Compton', et in Ho duo feoda, set non facit inde nisi unum.

Nicholaus le Bastard' tenet in Eppeford' dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Alba Mara tenet in Stokes, Whytelegh', et in Wythy iij. feoda [et dimidium], set non facit inde nisi servicium ij. feodorum et dimidii.

Alanus de Buddekeshyde et participes sui tenent in Buddekeshid' j. feodum.

Idem tenent in Yekkesburne, Whitefeud', et Cureworth' j. feodum.

Robertus Folioth' tenet in Tamerton' et in Blakestane iij. partes j. feodi.


[1] In repeated.

790 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.780-792 - cont.

Robertus de Penilles et Ricardus le Breth' tenent in Bakeleford' j. feodum.

Rogerus de Bokland' tenet in Bocland' et in Cherlecumb' [1] j. feodum.

Ricardus Folioth' tenet in Welles dimidium feodum.

Ricardus filius Radulfi tenet in Widecumb' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Willelmus de Baggetorre tenet in Aure unum feodum.

Ricardus filius Radulfi tenet in Twyneya vj. partem j. feodi.

Aubrea de Boterellis tenet in Ioweford' j. feodum.

Heredes David de Holrig tenent in Holrig terciam partem j. feodi.

Nicholaus Burdon et Martinus de la Torre tenent in Whyteweye sextam partem j. feodi.

Comes Devonie tenet in Aylekesdon' in dominico j. feodum.

Philippus de Bello Monte tenet in Ilstinthon' j. feodum.

Nicholaus le Bastard' tenet in Herewaldeshore iiij. partem j. feodi.

Radlulfus de Alba Mara tenet in Wodelegh' j. feodum.

Wilelmus de Morlegh' tenet in Morlegh' et in Starig j. feodum.

Baldewinus de Wayford' et heredes Radulfi le Abbe tenent j. feodum.

Willelmus de Bradelegh' et Ricardus de Cumb' tenent in Cumb' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Ricardus de Benlegh' et Nicholaus de Molis tenent in Benlegh' j. feodum.

Herebertus filius Mathei tenet in Aueton' et in Stokes j. feodum.

Willelmus de Morlegh' tenet in Grimeston' j. feodum.

Henricus Prior tenet in Stancumb' xij. partem j. feodi.

Ricardus filius Radulfi tenet ij. in Silfingeford' ij. partes j. feodi.

Reginaldus de Brenton' tenet in manerio de Exeministre iiij. partem j. feodi.

Thomas Mauduth' tenet in Suthwod' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Willelmus de Molehywis et Radulfus Bonvallet tenent in Esseford' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Radulfus de Doddescumb' tenet in Leudene dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Welinton' tenet in Langelegh' et in Braderig j. feodum.

Willelmus de Helihun tenet in Crye vj. partem j. feodi.

Ricardus de Worth' tenet in Worth' dimidium feodum.

Rogerus le Poer tenet in Blakebergh' x. partem j. feodi.

Heredes Gilberti Blundi tenent in Clist dimidium feodum.

Ricardus filius Radulfi tenet in Ferndon terciam partem j. feodi.

Ricardus de Hokesham tenet in la Ford' vj. partem j. feodi.

Breve.

Totus iste rotulus est in magno rotulo.

[Endorsed:-] Devon', Cornub' [and in a large Exchequer hand] Testa Nevill'.


[1] Cherleton, on p. 708.

DEVON. 791

S.ij.21.I.792-800.

Feoda Honoris de Beri que Willelmus Caperun, custos heredis Henrici de la Pomeray, tenet. Breve.

Robertus de Campellis tenet in Weststodlegh' dimidium feodum.

Hugo Coffin tenet in Yanton' dimidium feodum.

Heredes Henrici le Deneis tenent in Pankardeswik' j. feodum.

Robertus de Bosco tenet in Decnesbere et in Huttesdon' iij. partem j. feodi.

Robertus de Flexbir' tenet in Heremarmesworth' viij. partem j. feodi.

Jurdanus Russel tenet in Worthy viij. partem j. feodi.

Ricardus de Putteford tenet in Putteford, Atteworth, et in Stane j. feodum.

Jurdanus de Esse tenet in Esse iiij. partem j. feodi.

Johannes de Dune tenet in Dune iij. partem j. feodi.

Laurencius Flandrensis tenet in Lewenescoth' et in Brighteneswych' iij. partem j. feodi.

Willelmus Probus tenet in Dunneworth' xx. partem j. feodi.

Ricardus de Langeford' tenet in Braworth' xxxij. partem j. feodi.

Jocelinus de Lancell' tenet in Esthorewod' et Pinhorwod' dimidium feodum.

Johannes de Tryl tenet in Brocland' et in Borcumb' dimidium feodum. Ricardus Langeford in Borcome.

Robertus de Helihun tenet in Gatecumb' dimidium feodum.

Wymundus de Ralegh' tenet in Smalerig' antiqu' dimidium feodum, nullum modo facit regale.

Henricus Gobaud' tenet in Wicrofte xj. partes j. feodi.

Willelmus de Kelly tenet in Hevetre iiij. partem j. feodi.

Robertus de Hokesham tenet in Hokesham dimidium feodum.

Robertus le Peytevin tenet in Cridie, Denescumb, Westwogewill' et in Estwogewill' duo feoda et dimidium.

Heres Henrici le Deneys tenet in Sudthwik' dimidium feodum.

Heres Hugonis de Bollay tenet in Blakebergh' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Alicia de Ros tenet in Chyfethorn dimidium feodum.

Rogerus Giffard' tenet in Aulescumb' dimidium feodum.

Abbas de Dunekewill' tenet in Otery j. feodum.

Willelmus et Alexander tenent in Trilbehegh' xij. partem j. feodi.

Willelmus de Beldemerse tenet in Gatepath' j. feodum.

Heredes Hugonis de Bollay tenent in alia Gatepath' j. feodum.

Johannes de Babbecumb' tenet in Babbecumb' dimidium feodum.

Gervasius de Horthon' tenet in Manethon' dimidium feodum.

Jurdanus de Esse tenet in Mededon' et in Dupeford' dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Molehywisse tenet in Molehywisse dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Horthon' tenet in Addebyr' dimidium feodum per servicium tercie partis j. feodi.

Rogerus le Poer tenet in Rappinghegh' dimidium feodum.

Henricus de la Hille et Willelmus de Eston' tenent in Hille et in Eston' dimidium feodum.

792 A.D, 1212-1243.

S.ij.21.I.792-800 - cont.

Henricus de Ralegh' tenet in Strethe j. feodum.

Rogerus de Praulle tenet in Kynedon' et in Ernecumb' j. feodum.

Breve. In rotulo.

Feoda de Braneis que Willelmus de la Lond' tenet de ballio domini regis.

Henricus et Thomas de Yaldestane tenent in Cumb' dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Tracy tenet in Bradeford' dimidium feodum.

Rogerus de Middeldon' tenet in Middeldone viij. partem j. feodi.

Godefridus Challo tenet in Incledene et in Bocland' j. feodum.

Heredes Radulfi de Bray tenent in Bockland' iiij. partem j. feodi quod fuit antiquitus dimidium feodum.

Thomas le Brethon' tenet in Burgh' viij. partem j. feodi.

Heredes Thome de Radeweye tenent in Radeweye et in Settesbergh' viij. partem j. feodi.

Baldewinus le Flemeng tenet in Esse, Hakeston', et Duntingthon' j. feodum.

Oliverus de Tracy tenet in Wollecumb' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Cecilia de Lyn et Henricus Loueth tenent in Lyn iiij. partem j. feodi.

Hamelinus de Deudone tenet in Bykeworth' et in La Ferine ix. partem j , feodi.

Willelmus Fauuel, Mauger de Speranger et Marioth' de Radespree tenent in Hilcrinton' quartam partem j. feodi.

Idem Willelmus tenet in Welanger x. partem j. feodi.

Ricardus de Furshille tenet in Furshille xx. partem j. feodi.

Robertus Tyrel tenet in Alfardesworth', Sessecoth', Scotteworth', et in Hethestapele j. feodum.

Galfridus de Legh' tenet in Estlegh' j. feodum.

Johannes de Legh' tenet in Suthlegh' j. feodum.

Stephanus de Haccumb' tenet in Axeministre dimidium feodum.

Rogerus de Rem et Ricardus de Membyr' tenent in Eatmembyr' j. feodum.

Willelmus Viel tenet in Haurig dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Alba Mara tenet in Tetteburne dimidium feodum.

Thomas de Orweye tenet in Pisewill' dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Stanton' et Ricardus de Bembyr' et Willelmus de Tracy tenent in Yvedon' iij. partes j. feodi.

Rogerus Giffard' tenet in Aulescumb' iij. partem j. feodi.

Heredes Galfridi filii Willelmi tenent in Otery ij. feoda.

Reginaldus de Albo Monesterio tenet in Godeford' viij. partem j. feodi.

Ricardus Pudding tenet in Cobbewimple iij. partem j. feodi.

Johannes le Barun tenet in Bocland' dimidium feodum.

Rogerus de Rem tenet in Radeworth' iij. partem j. feodi.

Johannes le Barun et Walterus per Tut tenent in Nithereton' j. feodum.

Lucas de Tuz Seinz et Lucas de Barevil' tenent in Tuz Seinzton' j. feodum.

DEVON. 793

S.ij.21.I.792-800 - cont.

Nicholaus le Enginnur tenet in Matterord' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Abbas de Dunekewill' tenet in Rappinghegh' dimidium feodum.

Henricus de Yaldestane tenet in Yaldestane dimidium feodum.

Heredes Alexandri de Crues tenent in Morceth' j. feodum.

Radulfus de Sicca [1] tenet in Putiton' dimidium feodum.

In rotulo. Breve.

Feoda de Banton' que fuerunt Willelmi Paynel que Herbertus filius Mathei habet.

Johannes de Lideford', Willelmus de Bykelegh' et Henricus de Altaribus tenent in Byri j. feodum.

Robertus le Deneys et Juliana Cumyn et Walterus Cumyn tenent in Deuval' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Willelmus de la Thorne tenet in Hele dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Doddescumb' tenet in Doddescumb' dimidium feodum.

Henricus de Barnevil' tenet in Hakeworth' j. feodum.

Nicholaus de Wadelegh' tenet in Hauekareland' xl.. partem feodi.

Unfridus Rosel tenet ibidem iiijxx partem j. feodi.

Willelmus Pouleth' tenet in Legh' iiij. partem j. feodi.

In rotulo. Breve.

Feoda Galfridi de Mandevil' de Honore de Merswod' in Sumerset.

Ivo de Servinton' tenet in Spreweye dimidium feodum.

Heres Ricardi Beupel tenet in Cnuston' dimidium feodum.

Matheus de Banton' tenet in Cumb' j. feodum.

Reginaldus de Mohun in Otery et in Holedich iij. feoda.

Robertus de Blakeford' tenet in Dunesford' dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Morcell' tenet in Godelingthon' cum membris j. feodum.

Willelmus de Wydeworth' tenet in Leuestelegh' dimidium feodum.

Reginaldus de Mohun tenet in Stokes ij. feoda.

Gilbertus filius Stephani tenet in Northon' j. feodum.

Baldewinus de Raddon' tenet in Raddon' ij. partes j. feodi de Moreton'.

Robertus de Molehiwis tenet in Molehiwis iiij. partem j. feodi.

In rotulo. Breve.

Feoda Patricii de Chaworces de parte sua de Honore de Odecumb' in Sumerset.

Willelmus de Legh' tenet in Legh' ij. partes j. feodi de Moretoin'.

Heres Baldewini de Belestane tenet in La Hegheland' iij. partem j. feodi.

In rotulo. Breve.


[1] After Sicca, supply Vida as on p. 758.

794 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.21.I.792-800 - cont.

Feoda Gerardi de Odingeseles.

Radulfus de Pinu tenet in Bradewill' dimidium feodum.

Henricus de Dune tenet in Dune cum membris ij. feoda.

Breve.

Feoda Johannis de Nevil'.

Walterus de Ralegh' tenet in Wauerkelegh' j. feodum.

Robertus de Cantelo, Ricardus filius Johannis, et Walterus de Ralegh' tenent in Westbray dimidium feodum.

Ricardus filius Johannis tenet in Sudbray et in Blakepole j. feodum et xij. partem j. feodi.

Summa ij. feoda, dimidium et xij. pars.

Feoda Nicholai de Molis.

Johannis de Tuddeham tenet in Stanton' dimidium feodum de honore de Kerlihun.

Nicholaus de Molis ... dimidium feodum in Depef'.

Quia transfretavit. Breve.

Breve. In rotulo.

Item feoda comitis Devonie de Honore Plimtonie.

Johanna Brywerre et Baldewinus de Wayford' tenent in Cadebir' xxx. partem j. feodi.

Radulfus Buty tenet in Blakebergh' et in Esseford' j. feodum.

In rotulo.

Feoda Willelmi de Cantilupo de Honore Tottonie.

Willelmus Pipard tenet in Tetticot' de manerio de Clautone j. feodum.

Johannes de Hyndeford tenet in Hyndeford iij. partes j. feodi.

Muriel de Bolley tenet in Wodeford dimidium feodum.

Willelmus le Abbe tenet in Lughetorr' et in Parva Thorz j. feodum et dimidium.

Radulfus de Stadbir' tenet in Backemore et in Hunelaunde iij. partes j. feodi.

Johannes de Regni tenet in Brighton' dimidium feodum.

Willelmus Pipard tenet in Langedune dimidium feodum.

Henricus de Brigtricheston' in Brigtrichest' j. feodum.

Radulfus de Carevile tenet in* *terciam partem j. feodi.

Prior Plimtonie tenet in Shireford iijam partem j. feodi.

Johannes de Regni tenet in Chicheburgh' vj. partem j. feodi.

Wido le Bret et Henricus de Waleford tenent in Waleford et in Stoddune vj. partem j. feodi.

Willelmus Pipard tenet in Gary terciam partem j. feodi.

Ricardus de Gary et Robertus de Bykecote tenent in Tullesle et in Bikecote j. feodum.

Johannes de Alba Mara tenet in Tavy quartam partem j. feodi.

DEVON. 795

S.ij.21.I.792-800 - cont.

Nicholaus de Eslegh' tenet in Eslegh' j. feodum.

Prior Plimtonie tenet in Parva Sideham terciam partem j. feodi.

Hospital' de Bokelaunde tenent in More iiij. partem j. feodi.

Johannes de Raddune tenet in Raddune et Aureford duo feoda.

Gilbertus filius Stephani tenet in Redmore j. feodum [et] dimidium.

Gilibertus Crespin tenet in Lamsede et Alnetheston' j. feodum et iiij. partem j. feodi.

Walterus de Mimilaunde tenet in Mimilaunde dimidium feodum.

Heredes Henrici le Deneys tenent in Calsintone j. feodum.

Ricardus Bauceyn tenet in Uvereblachesuurthe iiij. partem j. feodi.

Radulfus de Stodbiri tenet in Stodbir' iiij. partem j. feodi.

Willelmus Giffard et Ricardus de Mewy tenent in Hughemewy dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Penilles tenet in Lughetone dimidium feodum.

Wydo de Brianne et Jacobus de Vado tenent in Hemmeston' iij. partem j. feodi.

Rogerus de Punchardun tenet in Cumb' dimidium feodum.

Johannes de Arundel [1] tenet in Luvenetor dimidium feodum.

Willelmus Pipard tenent in Nortbuvy dimidium feodum.

Johannes de Alba Mara tenet in Hiwiss' dimidium feodum.

Gilibertus filius Stephani tenet in Gaumeton' j. feodum.

Idem Gilibertus tenet in Hiwiss' et in Boclaunde j. feodum.

Radulfus de Beaumis tenet in Baggetone dimidium feodum.

Johannes de Alba Mara tenet in Curtescnolle dimidium feodum.

Willelmus et Adam de Bradelg' tenent in Bradelg' j. feodum.

Ada Bernard et heredes Radulfi de Uppetone tenent in Uppetone dimidium feodum.

Henricus de Tiddewrth' tenet in Cornnewrth' xx. partem j. feodi.

Willelmus de Bykelg' tenet in Cheveleston' j. feodum.

Willelmus de la Pumeray tenet in Pole j. feodum.

Aubrea de Pynu tenet in Mallestone dimidium feodum.

Johannes de Regni de Sumerset tenet in Thurislgh' vj. partem j. feodi.

Breve. In rotulo.

Feoda Comitis Ricardi de Honore de Launceveton.

Ricardus Coffin tenet in Alwynton' ij. feoda de Moreton' de baronia de Middelland' in Cornubia.

Ricardus de Sechevil' tenet in Hele de comite Cornubie per medium iij. partem j. feodi.

Ricardus Franceis tenet in Stokkelegh', in Hele, et in Kollelegh' ij. partes j. feodi de eodem per medium.

Henricus de Bratton' tenet in Alvredescoth' una cum Aylescoth' et Were unum feodum de eodem per medium.

Baldewinus le Flemeng tenet in Wybbebeyre Nicholai Pulain dimidium feodum de eodem.

Ricardus de Rupe tenet in Cottelegh' dimidium feodum de baronia de Cardynan in Cornubia.

Radulfus le Rus tenet in Parva Modbyr' j. feodum de Moretoin' de baronia de Cardinan in Cornubia.


[1] Read Luvenetor as on p. 768.

796 A.D. 1242-1213.

S.ij.21.I.792-800 - cont.

Baldewinus le Flemeng tenet in Crideho j. feodum de Moreton' de comite Cornubie.

Idem Baldewinus tenet in Bratton' cum membris duo feoda et dimidium de Moreton' de eodem.

Heredes Alexandri de Crues tenent in Anesty dimidium feodum de Moretoin' de baronia de Cardinan.

Galfridus de Pridias tenet in Horcherdton' j. feodum de Moreton' de honore de Tremeton'.

Hugo Peverel tenet in Spridelcumb' dimidium feodum de eodem honore.

Robertus Fort Escu tenet in Wymundeston' j. feodum de eodem.

Stephanus de Ludebrok' tenet in Ludebrok', Baucumb', Dynenton' et in Yedmareston' ij. feoda et v. partes j. feodi de eodem.

Willelmus de Ferers tenet in Nyweton' et in Puselynch' j. feodum de Moreton' de eodem honore.

Wido de Bredevil' tenet in Curnwod' et in Ludeton' j. feodum et iiij. partem j. feodi de Moreton' de eodem honore.

Hugo Peverel tenet in una et altera Hereford' ij. partes j. feodi de Meretoyn' de eodem honore.

Walterus de Fenton' tenet in Bradeford' et in Fenton' j. feodum de Moret' de eodem honore.

Margeria filia Stephani tenet in Pek' j. feodum de Moret' de eodem honore.

Warinus filius Juelis tenet in Ferthedel j. feodum de Moret' de eodem honore.

Juelis de Stanhuse tenet in Lippeston' j. feodum de Moret' de eodem honore.

Heredes Isabelle Giffard' tenent in Hanecnolle j. feodum de Moret' de eodem.

Willelmus de Ferers tenet in Ber et in Legh' j. feodum de Moret' et iiij. partem j. feodi.

Thomas de Cirencestre tenet in Wodhywisse j. feodum de honore de Cardinan de feodo de Moretoin.

Wido de Reftercumb' tenet in Reftercumb' v. partem j. feodi de Moret' de eodem honore.

Johannes filius Johannis tenet in Nottesworth' iij. partem j. feodi de Moret' de eodem.

Thomas de Cyrencestre tenet in Seintmarichurehe et in Harestane dimidium feodum de eodem honore.

Heredes Petri de Baddestane tenent in Baddestane j. feodum de Moret' de honore de Tremethon'.

Alanus de Boltebyr' tenet in Boltebyre dimidium feodum et vj. partem j. feodi de Moret' de honore de Cardinan.

Breve. In rotulo.

Feoda heredum Willelmi Briwerre de Honore de Odecumb' in Sumerset.

Willelmus de Bykelegh' tenet in Bocland' xvj. partem j. feodi de Moreton'.

DEVON. 797

S.ij.21.I.792-800 - cont.

Heres Roberti Milonis tenet in Putteford' dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Bolkeworth' tenet in Bulkeworth' dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Sicca [1] et Gervasius de Uppecoth' tenent in Sutton' et in Uppecoth' iiij. partem j. feodi de Moretoyn.

Summa j. feodum iiij. et xvj. pars j. feodi.

Breve. In rotulo.

In libro.

Feoda de quibus nescitur per inquisiciones a quorum honoribus vel per que servicia teneantur.

Robertus de Sicca Villa tenet in Scoceswyk viij. partem j. feodi de Radulfo de Sicca Villa, nescitur de cuius honore. In rotulo.

Mauricius de Coltesuurth' tenet in Coltesuurth' xvj. partem j , feodi de eodem. In rotulo.

Alicia de Moun tenet in Axem' de rege, neacitur per quantum feodi. In rotulo.

Ricardus Drogonis tenet in Thombir' xvj. partem j. feodi de priore de Monte Acuto, nescitur de cuius honore. In rotulo.

Johannes de Alba Mara tenet in Brunardestone iiij. partem j. feodi de G. de Crewecumbe de feodis de Moretoyne, set nescitur utrum de rege vel de aliis. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet in Hemmestone ij. feoda de Moreton', set nescitur utrum de rege vel de comite Cornubie. Breve.

Reginaldus de Valle Torta tenet in aqua de Taumbre cum pertinenciis de rege, set nescitur quantum feodum. In rotulo.

Alanus la Zuche tenet manerium de Northmouton', nescitur per quod servicium. In rotulo.

Gervasius de Peateton' tenet in Peatetone j. feodum de Moretoyn', nescitur utrum de honore comitis Devonie de Plimton' vel de honore de Asshulle in Sumerset. In rotulo.

HEREFORD.

S.ij.22.I.281-312.

Henricus Dei gracia rex Anglie, dominus Hibernie, dux Normannie, Aquitanie et comes Andegavie, vicecomiti Herefordie, salutem. Datum est nobis intelligi quod plures sunt in comitatu tuo qui tenent per servicia militaria tam de nobis quam de aliis qui tenent de nobis in capite qui contradicunt solvere scutagia de feodis suis et dicunt quod non tenent per servicia militaria neque de nobis neque de aliis qui de nobis tenent in capite. Et quia scutagia nobis sunt concessa per commune consilium rengni nostri tam de novo feoffamento quam de veteri, tibi precipimus quod diligentem facias inquisicionem in predicto comitatu tuo, tam infra libertatem quam extra, per sacramentum xijcim proborum et legalium hominum, tam militum quam aliorum, per quos rei veritas melius sciri poterit, et qui tales sunt quod nos ad eos capere possimus si in aliquo deliquerint, quot feoda


[1] After Sicca, supply Villa, as on p. 702.

798 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

tenentur tam de nobis quam de aliis qui tenent de nobis in capite, et tam de novo feffamento quam de veteri, et distringas illos qui feoda illa tenent ad reddendum nobis scutagia sua de feodis suis, ita quod tu habeas ea scutagia super compotum tuum proximum ad scaccarium nostrum et inquisicionem et hoc breve. Teste A. thesaurario Sancti Pauli London' apud Westmonasterium, nono die Decembris anno regni nostri vicesimo septimo.

Inquirantur singula feoda in singulis comitatibus. Et qui teneant feoda, et de quibus, et in quibus terris sint feoda, et de quorum honoribus teneant feoda, sive sint honores capitales in comitatu vel non; et de hiis qui tenent capitales honores in comitatu quot feoda habeant in comitatu, et in quibus terris; et inquisitionem feodum [1] et terris modo predicto, de residuis villis tocius comitatus per hundreda fiat rotulus in quo contineantur nomina villarum, et nomina tenendum easdem, et per que servicia dicunt [2] se tenere, et de quibus. Et habeat vicecomes rotulum illum ad scaccarium una cum rotulo de feodis.

HUNDREDUM LEOMENISTR'.

Inquisicio facta apud Leomenistr' per preceptum domini regis die Veneris ante Conversionem Sancti Pauli de hiis qui tenent in hundredo Leomenistr' tam de domino rege in capite per servicia militaria quam de aliis qui tenent de domino rege in capite, et quot feoda tenentur tam de domino rege quam de aliis qui tenent de eo in capite, tam de novo feffamento quam de veteri, scilicet per sacramentum Philippi de Samesfeud, Willelmi de Forda, Radulfi de Yedefen, Roberti de Mappenor', Stephani de Neuton', Johannis de Sancto Albino, Ricardi Brun de Luntelegh', Willelmi de la Mortuna, Milonis de Dunhamtona, Walteri de la Wode, Ricardi le Baillif, et Johannis de Eatona.

Homtona Ricardi. Ricardus de Homtona tenet in Homtona de veteri feffamento duas hydas pro tribus partibus feodi de heredibus Walteri de Lascy de honore de Webbel, et idem heredes tenent eundem honorem de rege in capite; et superplus feodi continetur infra rotulum hundredi de Stratford'.

Homtona Mappenor'. Robertus de Mappenor' tenet in Homtona de veteri feffamento feodum dimidii militis de Waltero de Clifford' de honore de Clifford', sed nesciunt de quo idem Walterus tenet honorem ilium in capite.

Forda et Samesfeud'. Willelmus de Forda tenet in Forda et Sarnesfeud' feodum dimidii militis de Waltero de Clifford' de veteri feffamento de honore de Clifford'.

Wavertona et Neutona'. Hugo de Crofta tenet in Wavertona et Neutona de veteri feffamento medietatem dimidii feodi unius


[1] Read inquisitis feodis as in Memoranda Roll, L.T.R. no 14, m. 5.
[2] Dicunt is repeated.

HEREFORD. 799

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

militis excepta quinta parte feodi unius militis de honore de Dylun. Et idem honor est in custodia domini regis.

Riseburi Malerbe. Adam Malerbe tenet in Riseburi de veteri feffamento octavam partem feodi unius militis de heredibus Johannis Malerbe de honore de Dylun, et idem heredes tenent de eodem honore.

Yedefen et Buterl'. Radulfus de Yedefen tenet in Yedefen et Buterl' de veteri feffamento feodum unius militis de episcopo Herefordensi, sed nesciunt de quo idem episcopus tenet feudum illud in capite. Episcopus habet breve.

Parva Hetfeud'. Andreas de Parva Hethfeud tenet de Ricardo de Kinardesl' de veteri feffamento in Parva Hethfeud' decimam partem feodi unius militis, et idem Ricardus de Waltero de Scudemor', et idem Walterus de Godefrido de Gamages, et idem Godefridus de heredibus Radulfi de Tony de honore Castelli Matildis qui est in custodia domini regis. Breve.

Brocmantona. Ricardus de Kurcun tenet in Brocmantona de veteri feffamento decimam partem feodi unius militis de Willelmo de Stutevilla de honore de Bureford', et idem Willelmus tenet honorem illum de rege in capite.

Hamenes'. Hugo de Hamenes' tenet in Hamenes' de veteri feffamento quintam partem feodi unius militis de Waltero de Clifford' de honore de Clifford'.

Eatona. Hugo filius Bernardi et Robertus de Fuleham tenent in Eatona de veteri feffamento decimam partem feodi unius militis de Johanne de Pabeham, et Johannes tenet feodum illud de Willelmo de Bello Campo de honore de Bedeford', et idem Willelmus tenet honorem illum de rege in capite.

Eatona. Walterus de Eatona tenet in Eatona de veteri feffamento dimidium feodum unius militis de Hugone de Kilpec de honore de Kilpec, et idem Hugo tenet honorem illum de rege in capite.

Bradefeud'. Walterus de Rofhey tenet in Bradefeud' de veteri feffamento de Galfrido de Cruece feodum quarte partis unius militis, et idem Galfridus de Rogero de Clifford, et idem Rogerus de Waltero de Clifford de honore de Clifford.

Mitletona. Johannes de Sancto Albino tenet in Mitletona de veteri feffamento quintam partem feodi unius militis de Rogero Pichard, et idem Rogerus de comite de Hereford', sed nesciunt de quo honore. Comes habet breve.

Eistona. Brianus de Bromtona tenet in Eistona de veteri feffamento feodum unius militis de Radulfo de Mortuo Mari de honore de Wiggemor', et idem Radulfus tenet honorem illum in capite de rege.

Lunteleya. Willelmus de Evereus tenet in Luntel' de veteri feffamento feodum dimidii militis de Waltero de Baskervill', et idem Walterus tenet feudum illud de honore de Dylun qui est in custodia domini regis.

Homme. Willelmus de Homme tenet in Homme feodum dimidii militis de veteri feffamento de Waltero de Clifford de honore de Clifford'.

800 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

Dylun. Robertus le Rus tenet in Dylun de veteri feffamento quartem partem feodi unius militis de honore de Dylun qui est in custodia domini regis.

Sarnesfeud Rogeri. Rogerus de Sarnesfeud tenet in Sarnesfeud' vicesimam partem feodi unius militis de veteri feffamento de honore de Radenouer de Radulfo de Mortuo Mari, et idem Radulfus tenet honorem illum ratione custodie unius heredum Willelmi de Brausa quem habet in custodia.

Sarnesfeud Philippi. Philippus de Sarnesfeud tenet in Sarnesfeud de veteri feffamento feodum dimidii militis de heredibus Walteri de Lascy de honore de Webbel', et iidem heredes tenent honorem illum de rege in capite.

Gaderedehop et Uptuna. Johannes de Waudebuef tenet de veteri feffamento in Gaderedehop' dimidium feodum unius militis de honore de Breckenio, sed non reddit inde scutagium sed debet inde wardam in castro de Brecken'. Idem eciam tenet feodum dimidii militis in Uptuna de eodem honore per eundem servicium. Comes habet breve.

Humbr'. Matheus des Mans tenet in Humbr' de veteri feffamento dimidium feodum unius militis de honore de Breckenio, sed non facit inde nisi wardam. Habet breve.

[Tags for the seals of the jurors appear to have been made by cutting the parchment transversely. They have disappeared.]

HUNDREDUM DE GREITRE.

In villata de Ros continentur quinque hide per servicium militare un [1] quas dominus episcopus tenet de domino rege in capite de veteri feffamento. Breve.

In vill' de Huptun' continentur quinque hyde quas dominus episcopus tenet de domino rege ut superius. Breve.

In villata de Wafford' continentur quinque hyde quas Thomas de Wafford' tenet per servicium militare de episcopo Herefordensi de veteri feffamento de honore de Ros. Breve.

In vill' de Caple continetur feodum unius militis quem Willelmus de Caple [tenet] de domino episcopo Herefordensi per servicium militare de eodem feffamento et de eodem honore. Breve.

In villata de Hope Mal Oysel continentur due hyde quas abbas de Glocestria tenet de Waltero de Huntelege, et Walterus de Huntel' de domino Johanne de Munemue, et tenet dictus abbas per serianteriam de honore de Munemue.

In vill' de Estun' Ingan continentur due hyde quas Rogerus de Estun' tenet per servicium militare de honore de Cormaylles de veteri feffamento.

In vill' de Lintun' continentur due hyde et dimidia quas Gilbertus Talebot tenet per servicium militare de domino rege in capite de veteri feffamento.


[1] So in MS. but omit.

HEREFORD. 801

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

In vill' de Kingestun' continentur due hyde quas abbas de Cormailles tenet de veteri feffamento de dono domini regis.

In vill' de Westun' Bret continentur due hyde quas Matheus le Bret tenet de domino Rogero Pichard per servicium militare, et idem Rogeraa Pichard de honore de Breckinnoc de veteri feffamento. Breve.

In villata de Bromtun' continetur una hyda quam abbas de Glocestria tenet de veteri feffamento de dono regum Anglie.

In vill' de Etun' continentur due hyde et dimidia, unde Robertus Tregoz unam hydam per servicium militare de domino rege de veteri feffamento de honore de Ewyas, et Robertus de Wytteneye unam hydam de dicto Roberto Tregoz, et Ricardus Fuke dimidiam hydam de dicto Roberto Tregoz per servicium militare de eodem honore et feffamento. Breve.

In vill' de Hope Solers continentur tres hydes [1] que respondent pro uno feodo quas Walterus de Solar', filius et heres Jacobi de Solar', tenet de feodo de Cormailles de veteri feffamento.

In vill' de Mangna Markele continentur quindecim hyde unde Johannes de Balun unum feodum per servicium militare de domino rege et de veteri feffamento; et Reginaldus de la Mare duas hydas de Johanne de Balun per servicium militare de eodem feffamento; et Jordanus Avenel unam hydam per servicium militare de eodem feffamento.

In vill' de Wulveve Hope continentur xv. hyde quas canonici de Sancto Athelberto tenent [2] apud Herheford de dono Wulveve et Godheve de veteri feffamento.

In vill' de Putteleg' una continetur hyda quam Cecilia de Evereus tenet per servicium militare de honore de Webbeleg.

In villata de Fauue Hope continentur v. hide et dimidia quas Rogerus de Chandos tenet per servicium militare de honore de Snodhulle de veteri feffamento de rege, et Johannes de Burchull' dimidiam hidam eodem modo de domino Rogero de Chandos.

In vill' de Mordeford continentur [3] una hyda quam Rogerus de Hereford' tenet per socagium de Radulfo de Beaufey de veteri feffamento de honore comitis de Ferers de quo dictus Radulfus tenet.

In vill' de Froma Henrici continetur una hyda quam Henricus de Munem' tenet de domino Garino de Munchanesi per servicium militare de honore de Munchanesi, et dictus Garinus de domino rege de veteri feffamento. Breve.

In vill' From' Prioris continetur una hida quam prior de Herford' tenet de dono Wige de veteri feffamento, et dictus Wyge de dono regum Anglie tenuit.

In vill' de Dormintun' continentur due hyde quas Johannes filius et heres Roberti de Stapeltun' tenet per serianteriam de domino Hereberto filio Petri, et dictus Herebertus de domino rege de veteri feffamento.

[Four slits for tags for the seals of the jurors.]


[1] So in MS.
[2] Tenent appears to be misplaced.
[3] Read continetur.

802 A.D. 1242-1243.

HUNDREDUM DE GRIMES WROSNE.

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

Walterus de Brocbire tenet quintam partem feodi unius militis in villata de Brocbir' de domino Waltero de Baskervile de honore de Wybbeles per servicium militare de veteri feffamento.

Milo Pichard tenet in vill' de Standun iiijor hydas de domino Rogero Pichard, scilicet de honore de Wybbeles quondam Walteri de Lacy per servicium militare, scilicet pro uno feodo.

Matheus de Mauns in eadem vill' de Standun iij. hydas pro uno feodo de domino Waltero de Clifford' per servicium militare de veteri feffamento.

Walterus de Wirmeles [1] in eadem vill' tenet duas hydas pro dimidio feodo de honore de Wybbeles de veteri feffamento per servicium militare.

Godefridus de Gamages tenet apud Maumeshull' Gamages unum feodum per servicium militare de honore de Webbeles de veteri feffamento.

Berttholomeus Pech' tenet in vill' de Monintun' unum feodum de custodia per Walterum de Muucegros de honore Hugonis de Marinis de veteri feffamento per servicium militare, et Hugo de Marinis de honore de Thony.

Johannes de Kenell' et Matildis de Tregoyt et Walterus de Bodeham tenent in vill' de Bullord' unum feodum per servicium militare de honore de Wibbeles de veteri feffamento.

Walterus de Baskervile tenet in vill' de Eausore duas hydas pro duabus partibus feodi per servicium militare de honore de Wybbeles de veteri feffamento.

Willelmus de Caple tenet in vill' de Wurmeleys unam hydam per servicium militare de honore de Wibb' de veteri feffamento.

Walterus de Baskervill tenet in vill' de Strattun' unam hidam per servicium militare de honore de Wibbel'.

Willelmus de Solles in eadem vill' dimidiam hidam per servicium militare de honore de Snodhull'.

Petrus de la Were ibidem dimidiam hydam per socagium de honore de Snodhull'.

Gilebertus Talebot tenet in vill' de Creddehull' dimidium feodum per servicium militare de honore de Snodhull'.

Katerina de Lacy in villa de Maumeshull' Lacy iij. hydas per servicium militare de honore de Radenore, [2] scilicet pro uno feodo.

Radulfus Thorel in vill' de Brunehope duas hydas per servicium militare de domino Herberto filio Petri de honore de Blenlevelin.

Johannes de Lingayne in vill' de Kenescestr' dimidiam hydam de Lanntony in Gloucestria de honore de Snodhull' de veteri feffamento.

Herebertus filius Petri in vill' de Tulintun' duas hydas pro dimidio feodo de custodia heredum Paganis de Burchull' per servicium militare de honore de Blenlevelin.


[1] Ricardus de Croft persona de Wavertun, cancelled.
[2] Substituted for Kingtun'.

HEREFORD. 803

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

Elyzabet de Gamag' et Batillis soror ipsius tenent in vill' de Burchull' duas hydas pro feodo militis per servicium militare de honore de Breckinnou de veteri feffamento.

Milo Pichard in vill' de Burweltun' duas hydas pro dimidio feodo per servicium militare de honore de Brekinn' de novo feffamento.

Anabil [1] et Juliana filie et heredes Walteri de Muucegros in Lude dimidiam hydam per servicium militare de honore de Wybbel' de veteri feffamento pro decima parte feodi militis.

Ricardus de Feypou in vill' de Lude dimidiam hydam per eamdem [2] servicium de honore de Webbel' de veteri feffamento pro decima parte feodi.

Ricardus de Baginden in vill' de Wudetun' de domino Rogero de Chand' unam hidam per servicium militare de honore de Snodhull' pro quinta parte feodi.

Domus de Lanntony in vill' de Erdeshope unam hidam per socagium de honore de Wybbel'.

Abbas de Gloucestria in Lude Saucey dimidium feodum per servicium militare de veteri feffamento per Radulfum de Saucey venditorem.

Robertus Malhore in eadem vill' unam hidam per socagium de honore de Webbel'. Tenet eciam dictus Robertus de domino rege dictam hidam ad firmam.

Rogerus de Chandos in vill' de Welintun' unum feodum militis de honore de Snodhull' per servicium militare de veteri feffamento.

[Six slits for tags for the seals of the jurors.]

HUNDREDUM DE STRATFORDE.

In villa de Lettun' continentur iij. hyde quas Ricardus de Hurteslege tenet per servicium militare de Waltero de Bask', et Walterus de Bask' de honore de Webbel' de veteri feffamento, et tenet dictas iij. hydas pro feodo unius militis.

In Kynardesle continetur una hyda quam Ricardus de Kinardesle tenet pro dimidio feodo per servicium militare de Symone de Burlege de veteri feffamento, et Symon de Burleg' de honore de Wygemore.

In Aumeley continentur iiijor hyde quas Rogerus Pichard tenet pro feodo unius militis de veteri feffamento de heredibus Walteri de Lacy de honore de Webbele.

In Lenhales, Uppekote continetur unum feodum militis quem Willelmus de Evereus tenet de heredibus Walteri de Lacy de veteri feffamento de honore de Webbel' per servicium militare.

In Merstun' due hyde pro dimidio feodo quas Willelmus Pichard tenet de Milone Pichard, et Milo Pichard de heredibus Walteri de Lacy de veteri feffamento de honore de Webbele.

In Stantun' due hyde pro uno feodo quas Walterus de Hoptun' et Andreas de Stantun' tenet [3] de Radulfo de Mortimer de honore de Wygemore de veteri feffamento.


[1] Read Amabil'.
[2] Read idem.
[3] Read tenent.

804 A.D 1242-1243.

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

Middeltun' due hyde quas Ricardus de Middeltun' tenet per socagium reddendo annuatim domino Hugoni de Mylevile unam marcam argenti de veteri feffamento de honore de Castro Ricardi.

In Sobbedune v. hyde unde abbas de Wygemore tres et dimidiam de dono antecessorum domini Radulfi de Mortuo Mari in puram et perpetuam elemosinam de honore de Wygemore et Bertholomeus de Sobbedun' unam hydam et dimidiam per servicium militare pro dimidio feodo de veteri feffamento de domino Radulfo de Mortuo Mari de veteri feffamento.

In Ledkote una hyda pro quinta parte feodi de [1] quam Robertus de Aufertun' et Adam filius Maelis tenent de Ricardo de Hamtun' per servicium militare de veteri feffamento, et Ricardus de Hamttune de heredibus de Lacy de honore de Webbeleg'.

In Kovenhop una hyda pro quarta parte feodi quam Rogerus Beauaire tenet de Johanne de Linganye per servicium militare de veteri feffamento de honore de Wygemore, et Johannes de Lingayne de Radulfo de Mortuo Mari de eodem feffamento.

In Lege una hyda pro dimidio feodo quam Robertus de Evereus tenet per servicium militare de Willelmo de Blez de veteri feffamento de honore de Radenore, et Willelmus de Blez de domino Radulfo de Mortuo Mari de eodem feffamento.

In Strete una hyda pro tercia parte feodi quam Thomas de la Strete tenet de domina Cecilla de Evereus de veteri feffamento per servicium militare de honore de Wybbeleg', et dicta Cecilia de dictis heredibus de Lacy eodem modo ut superius.

In Lautune una hyda pro quinta parte feodi quam Willelmus de Evereus tenet de Ricardo de Hamtune per servicium militare de veteri feffamento, et Ricardus de Hamtona de heredibus Walteri de Lacy eodem modo.

In Munekelane iiijor. hyde quas abbas de Cunches tenet in puram et perpetuam elemosinam de dono antecessorum de Thoney, et heredes de Thony de domino rege de veteri feffamento. Breve.

In Burlege iij. hyde pro uno feodo quas Symon de Burlege tenet de honore de Wygemore per servicium militare de veteri feffamento.

In Swenestune una hyda pro tercia parte feodi quam Philippus de Sarnesfeud tenet de heredibus Walteri de Lacy de veteri feffamento de honore de Webbel.

In Chabbenore iij. hyde per serianteriam quas Willelmus de Chabbenore tenet de heredibus Radulfi de Thony de veteri feffamento de honore de Thony. Breve.

In Pyonia v. hyde pro uno feodo militis unde Hugo de Verly medietatem per servicium militare de veteri feffamento de honore de Wybel', et Walterus de Eynesford' alteram medietatem eodem modo.

In Dylum due hyde et dimidia quas Robertus Malhore tenet ad firmam de domino rege.

In Neutun' dimidia hida per socagium quam Philippus de Sarnesfeld' tenet de heredibus Johannis de Loges de veteri feffamento de honore de Castro Ricardi.


[1] Omit de.

HEREFORD. 805

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

In Kingeslane, et Urselane, Burthune, Hentun', Thwyford' vij. hyde et dimidia pro duobus feodis et dimidio et quarta parte feodi quas Radulfus de Mortuo Mari tenet.

In Webbeleg' v. hyde quas domina Margeria de Lacy de novo tenet per preceptum domini W. archiepiscopi Eboracensis et justiciarii domini regis per servicium militare de honore de Webbeleg'.

In Penebruge cum villis adiacentibus vij. hyde et dimidia quas dominus Henricus de Penebruge tenet per servicium militare de honore de Radenore de veteri feffamento.

In Webbelege v. hyde que nunquam respondere solebant de scutagio.

[Eight slits for tags for the seals of the jurors.]

HUNDREDUM DE BROCKES ESSE.

In villa de Burchope Henrici continetur una hyda pro quinta parte unius feodi de heredibus Henrici de Longo Campo de honore de Wyltun' de veteri feffamento quam Henricus de Burhope tenet.

In villa de Bodeham Willelmi de Furches una hyda pro quarta parte feodi quam Isabella de Furches tenet in dotem de Willelmo de Furches, et Willelmus de Waltero de Lacy de honore de Webbeleg' de veteri feffamento.

In villa de Bodeham Walteri de Ebroicis continetur una hyda et dimidia, unde Walterus de Evereus unam hydam per servicium militare de honore de Breckinnou de veteri feffamento, et Walterus de Muucegros dimidiam hydam per servicium militare et eodem modo. Breve.

In villa de Bodeham Rogeri dimidia hyda quam Rogerus de Bodeham tenet de Waltero de Baskervil' tenet [1] per servicium militare, et Walterus de Baskervil' de W. de Waltero [2] Lacy de honore de Webbeleg'.

In villa de Magene Brian' una hyda quam Adam Malerbe tenet pro quinta parte feodi de Johanne Malerbe, et dictus Johannes de rege. Et Thomas Brian inde tenet medietatem eodem modo et de eodem feffamento.

In Magene Albini due hyde quas Isabella de Evereus tenet de Rogero Pichard per servicium militare, et idem Rogerus de honore de Webbeleg de feffamento veteri.

In Bradefeud una hyda quam Willelmus de Bradefeud tenet per socagium de Thoma Brian, et idem Thomas de rege de veteri feffamento.

In Merstun' una hyda unde Johannes de Wintercote medietatem de heredibus Walteri de Tranel' per servicium militare de honore de Webbel', et Andreas de Bradeleg' alteram medietatem de Johanne de Grendene per servicium militare de veteri feffamento, et Johannes de Grendene de Philippo de Sarnefeud, et idem Philippus de honore de Webbele de eodem feffamento.


[1] Omit tenet.
[2] For W. de Waltero read heredibus Walteri.

806 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

In Stanford' una hyda pro sexta parte feodi quam Walterus de Stanford' tenet de Rogero Pichard, et Rogerus Pichard de honore de Webbel' de eodem feffamento.

In Grendene una hyda quam Johannes de Grendene tenet de heredibus Walteri de Lacy pro quarta parte feodi de honore de Webbel' de eodem feffamento.

In Pencumbe xv. hyde unde Robertus de Wyten' medietatem de Roberto Tregoz de honore de Ewyas de veteri feffamento per servicium militare, et Thomas de Hemegrave alteram medietatem de Roberto de Wytten', et idem Robertus de eodem ut prius. Breve.

In Wakintun' due hyde quas Willelmus de Keyrdif tenet pro dimidio feodo de Waltero de Baskervil, et idem Walterus de honore de Webbel' de veteri feffamento.

In Rugedun' una hyda quam Johannes le Muingne tenet de heredibus Ade le Butiller de veteri feffamento per servicium militare pro quinta parte feodi de honore de Kintun'. Breve.

In Thorbiri vj. hyde quas Hugo le Butiller tenet de Philippo de Culumbers de honore de Sauwey [1] pro dimidio feodo unius militis de veteri feffamento.

In Colintun' due hyde quas Adam de Colintun' tenet de Castro Ricardi per servicium militare pro quarta parte feodi.

In Hunderlithe Walteri due hyde quas Walterus de Hunderlithe tenet per socagium de abbate de Wygemore.

In Stoke de Blez una hyda pro dimidio feodo quam Willelmus de Blez tenet de honore de Radenore per servicium militare de veteri feffamento.

In Wullereslowe vij. hyde pro feodo unius militis quas Rogerus le Engleis tenet de honore de Webbel' de veteri feffamento.

In Thoddesthome una hyda quam Robertus le Wafre tenet de Johanne de Weldebef, et idem Johannes de honore de Breckinnou de veteri feffamento. Breve.

In Thoddesthome la Mare due hyde continentur quas Willelmus de la Mare tenet de honore comitis Herefordie de veteri feffamento pro feodo unius militis. Breve.

In Hakes una hyda quam Willelmus de Helyun tenet de heredibus Thome de Lake per serianteriam, et idem Thomas de rege.

In Muntrich una hyda quam Walterus Muntrich tenet de Ricardo de Hamton' per servicium militare pro quinta parte feodi militis, et idem Ricardus de honore de Webbel' de veteri feffamento.

In Avenebiri ij. hyde quas Walterus de Avenebiri tenet pro uno feodo de comite Herefordie de honore de Kingtun' de veteri feffamento per servicium militare. Breve.

In Fenna due continentur hyde quas Thomas de la Fenne tenet pro dimidio feodo de honore de Kingtun' de veteri feffamento. Breve.

In Kingestanforde due hyde quas Ivo Pantulf tenet de domino rege per serianteriam reddendi annuatim unum brachetum domino regi de veteri feffamento.


[1] Read Stauwey, i.e. Nether Stowey, co. Somerset. See Hist. MSS. Comm. Report IX. App. p. 354.

HEREFORD. 807

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

In Hoptun' una hyda quam Margeria de Solers tenet de Hugone de Kilpec de honore de Kilpec per servicium militare de feffamento veteri.

In Magna Coerna vj. hyde et dimidia, unde Elena Pancefot medietatem de heredibus Willelmi de Brause de veteri feffamento de Brekinnoc, et Thomas de Avenebir' alteram medietatem de honore de Breckinoc eodem modo. Breve.

In Stanford' Superius dimidia hyda, unde Henricus Picot medietatem de rege per serianteriam, et Rogerus et Emma de la Hey alteram medietatem de veteri feffamento.

In Parva Coerna iij. hyde quas heredes Thome de Fraxino tenent de honore de Kintun' per servicium militare pro dimidio feodo de veteri feffamento. Breve.

In Stoke Lacy novem hyde, unde Willelmus de Evereus vj. et dimidiam de honore de Webbel' pro quarta parte feodi unius militis de veteri feffamento, et Ricardus de Beafou duas et dimidiam de honore de Webbel' de veteri feffamento et non respondent de aliquo servicio. Nichil.

In Acle Pichard iiijor hyde quas Rogerus Pichard tenet per servicium militare pro duabus partibus unius feodi de vereri feffamento de honore de Webbeleg'.

In Feltun' et Thinghull' vj. hyde quas prior de Hereford' tenet in puram et perpetuam elemosinam, et erat de honore de Kingtun'.

In Acle Lyre una hyda quam prior de Lire tenet in puram et perpetuam elemosinam de honore de Snodhulle de veteri feffamento.

In Magene Mauricii una hyda quam Rogerus de Magene tenet per servicium militare de domino Ricardo de Curceun, et dominus Ricardus de Curceun de Castro Ricardi de veteri feffamento.

In Suttune et Magene due hyde quas Hugo de Fraxino tenet de honore de Kingtune de veteri feffamento pro dimidio feodo unius militis. Breve.

In Salebiri dimidia hyda pro xvj. parte feodi quam Johannes le Muygne tenet per servicium militare de Ricardo Curceun de veteri feffamento de honore Castri Ricardi.

HUNDREDUM DE RADELAWE.

In villata de Bikertun' continetur una hyda pro dimidio [1] feodo unius militis quam Johannes de Bikertun' tenet de honore de Webbeleg' de veteri feffamento.

In vill' de Parva Markel continetur feodus unius militis quem Rogerus Tirel tenet de honore de Webbele de veteri feffamento.

In vill' de Eleuetun' continentur iij. hyde quas Willelmus de Broy tenet per serianteriam de domino rege de veteri feffamento.

In vill' de Pikesl' continetur una hyda pro quinta parte feodi unius militis quam Hugo de Pikesle tenet de Rogero de Estun' de honore de Cormailles de veteri feffamento.


[1] Substituted for quinta parte.

808 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

In vill' de Pikesl' Clinton' continetur dimidia hyda pro decima parte feodi militis quam Simon de Clintun' tenet de Willelmo de Arkelesdune de honore de Teukesbiri de feffamento veteri.

In vill' de Maynestun' continetur una hyda pro quinta parte feodi quam Ricardus de Fay tenet de honore de Munemue, scilicet de domino Johanne de Munemue de veteri feffamento.

In vill' de Parco continetur una hyda pro dimidio feodo quam Alienora de Parco tenet de Hugone de Kilpec et de honore de Kilpec de veteri feffamento.

In vill' de Munesleg continentur tres hyde, quas [1] unde Henricus de Wahulle medietatem de honore de Webbel' de veteri feffamento, et Thomas de Feypou alteram medietatem eodem modo.

In vill' de Aspertun' et Strattun' continentur v. hyde quas dominus Johannes de Munemue tenet de domino rege de veteri feffamento.

In vill' de Walsopethorne una hyda quam heredes Michaelis de Criketot tenent de domino de Munemue de veteri feffamento de honore de Munemue

In vill' de Froma Canonicorum iij. hyde quas canonici de Lanton' in Wallia tenent de honore de Webbel' de heredibus Walteri de Lacy de eodem feffamento. Elemosina.

In vill' de Froma Castri iiijor hyde pro feodo militis quas Gilibertus de Lacy tenet de heredibus W. de Lacy de honore de Webbel' de veteri feffamento.

In vill' de Mademe dimidia hyda quam Walterus Hamund tenet de Rogero Tyrel de honore de Webbel' de veteri feffamento.

In vill' de Hupledene iiijor hyde quas fratres de Templo de Upledene tenent de dono comitis Willelmi Marescalli de honore de Niubiri de veteri feffamento.

In vill' de Kantel una hyda quam Ysabella de Penebruge tenet de W. comite Marescallo de novo feffamento de honore de Niubiri.

In villata de Henlege una hyda quam Willelmus de Heume tenet de domino W. de Clifford' de honore de Clifford' de feffamento novo. Breve.

In vill' de Ledene dimidia hyda quam monacy Sancti Gudlacy de Hereford' tenent de Waltero de Lacy de honore de Webbel' de veteri feffamento. Sine scutagio.

In vill' de Esebege una hyda quam Stephanus de Esebege tenet de Rogero Tyrel de honore de Webbel' de veteri feffamento.

In vill' de Froma Heymund iiijor hyde quas Ysabella de Evereus tenet de dote de honore de Webbel' de veteri feffamento. Et solebant dicte iiij. hyde quondam respondere pro feodo unius militis, et postea relaxavit dictus Walterus de Lacy per cartam suam domino Stephano de Evereus pro dimidio feodo.

In vill' de Hida Monachorum una hyda de elemosina domini Walteri de Lacy de honore de Webbele de veteri feffamento. Sine scutagio.

In Langeford' dimidia hyda quam Petrus de Watevile tenet in dominico de domino Roberto Trublevile per servicium militare, et idem Robertus de honore de Blenlevelin.


[1] Omit quas.

HEREFORD 809

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

In villa Ricardi una hyda pro quinta parte feodi unius militis, unde Ricardus de Hyda tenet medietatem de Kaerdin de honore de Webbeleg' de veteri feffamento et alteram medietatem de Ricardo de Hurtealeg per servicium militare in villa de Wytewyke de honore de Webbeleg' per eundem servicium de veteri feffamento.

In villa de Wytewyke continentur due hyde quas Ricardus de Hurtesleg' tenet de domino Johanne de Munemue de veteri feffamento et de honore de Webbelege per servicium militare.

In villa de Westhyde continentur iij. hyde quas Walterus de Hyda tenet, de feodo de Akes Thony duas hydaa per servicium militare sine scutagio de veteri feffamento de honore de Thony, et de Waltero de Evereus unam hydam de veteri feffamento de honore de Snodhulle per socagium.

In villa de Westune una hyda quam Robertus de Westune tenet de heredibus Walteri de Lacy de honore de Webbelege de veteri feffamento per servicium militare.

In villa de Yarchulle continentur iiijor hyde quas Petronilla de Thony tenet de heredibus W. de Lacy de honore de Webbelege de veteri feffamento per servicium militare.

In villa de Stoke Edithe continentur due hyde unde Petronilla de Thony tenet duas hydas in dominico de domino rege per servicium militare de novo feoffamento de honore de Thony, et Willelmus de Solles dimidiam hydam per socagium, reddendo annuafcim decern solidos de veteri feffamento de honore de Clifford'. Breve.

In villa de Tatintune continentur iij. hyde quas Johannes le Bran, Hugo Giffard, Robertus Archer et Simon de Solariis tenent de veteri feffamento de honore de Cormailles per baroniam.

In villa de Parva Tatintune una hyda, unde Henricus de Munemue, Walterus de Mahurdin, Simon de Westune dimidiam hydam de domino Waltero de Dunre per servicium socagii de veteri feffamento, et Walterus de Dunre de domino Waltero de Clifford, et [1] Ricardus de Tatintune alteram medietatem de veteri feffamento de domino Waltero de Hyda, et idem Walterus de honore de Escotot per socagium.

In villa de Parva Aspertune una hyda unde Matilda de Aspertune tenet medietatem de Johanne de Matresdune, et Johannes de abbate de Gloucestria per servicium militare de veteri feffamento, et Reginaldus de Aspertune alteram medietatem, et Willelmus de la Voleye insimul de abbate de Gloucestria in puram et perpetuam elemosinam.

[Five slits for tags for the seals of the jurors.]

HUNDREDUM DE WULFEYE.

In Ludeford una hyda per socagium quam Jordanus de Ludeford tenet de Hynardo de Aumeruge de veteri feffamento, et dictus Hynardus de honore de Castro Ricardi per servicium militare.


[1] The remainder of thia entry originally read:-Walterus de Huntelege alteram medietatem de domino de Munemue de veteri feffamento.

810 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

In Castro Ricardi iij. hyde per servicium militare, unde Johannes Esturmi dimidiam hydam de veteri feffamento de honore de Castro Ricardi, et Ricardus de Kinardesl' pro quarta parte unius feodi militis eodem modo ut superius, et Jordanus de Ludeford pro quarta parte feodi de eodem honore de novo feffamento Roberti de Mortimer eiusdem castri.

In Alretun' iiijor hyde, unde dominus Radulfus de Mortuo Mari tenet tres hydas pro tribus partibus feodi per servicium militare de veteri feffamento de honore de Wygemor', et Thomas de Kareswelle quartam partem feodi per servicium militare de eodem honore.

In Crofta una hyda pro quarta parte feodi unius militis quam Hugo de Croft tenet per servicium militare de honore de Dylun de veteri feffamento.

In Parva Hereford' vij. hyde quas dominus Reginaldus de la +Male+ tenet de comite Herefordie pro duobus feodis de veteri feffamento de honore episcopatus Hereford', quia dictus comes Herefordie de dicto episcopo dictum manerium tenet. Breve.

In Rocheford due hyde quas Hugo de Mortimer tenet de domino Waltero de Clifford' pro dimidio feodo militis de honore de Clifford' de veteri feffamento, et dominus Walterus tenet de honore de Clifford. Regina.

In Huptun' una hyda et dimidia quam Thomas de Huptun' tenet de domino Rogero Pichard per serianteriam de veteri feffamento.

In Lastes due hyde, unde Hugo de Kilpec unam per servicium militare de veteri feffamento de honore de Boun, et Rogerus et Johannes Francissi alteram hydam pro octava parte feodi militis de domino Rogero Pichard de honore comitis Herefordie. Breve.

In Hethe dimidia hyde quam Walterus de Brocbiri tenet per servicium militare, de domino Ricardo de Hurtesl' dimidiam, et alteram de domino Willelmo de Kahurdif de veteri feffamento de honore. [1] Gloucestrie.

In Wyle due hyde, quas [2] unde heredes domini Henrici de la Lande tenent medietatem per servicium militare pro quarta parte feodi unius militis de honore Castri Ricardi, et Elyas de Clici [3] et Ricardus le Coc, Ricardus Caperun et Willelmus le Bel alteram medietatem per servicium militare pro quarta parte feodi de veteri feffamento de honore de Webbel'.

In Puttlesdune iij. hyde, unde Ricardus de Curceun dictaa trea hydas tenet per servicium militare pro tribus partibus feodi unius militis de veteri feffamento de honore de Castro Ricardi.

[Eight slits for tags for the seals of the jurors.]

HUNDREDUM DE URCHENEFELD.

In Kilpec cum pertinenciis continentur j. feodum et dimidium que feoda Hugo de Kilpec tenet de domino rege in capite.

Urchenefeld in Wallia respondere tenetur domino regi per sumonicionem de quinquaginta Wallensibus in tempore guerre, nec


[1] Supply de Webbel'.
[2] Omit quas.
[3] Read Elyas Clericua.

HEREFORD. 811

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

aliut servicium debet nisi tantum sectem hundredi secundum consuetudinem de Urchenefeld.

In Wurmetun' dimidius feodus quem Rogerus Thyrel tenet de Waltero de Lacy de veteri feffamento per servicium militare de honore de Webbeley.

In Wurmetun' item dimidius feodus quem Radulfus de Saucey tenet de Waltero de Lacy per servicium militare de veteri feffamento de honore de Wybbeley.

In Dewyes Welle dimidius feodus quem Johannes Thurbevile tenet de feodo Walteri de Dunre de veteri feffamento de honore de Clifford' per servicium militare, et Walterus de Dunre de domino Waltero de Clifford.

HUNDREDUM DE WEBBETRE.

In Bakintun' continetur feodua unius militis quem Ricardus de Hamtun' tenet de honore de Wybbel' per servicium militare de veteri feffamento.

In Chenestun' unus feodus quem Colinus de Evereus tenet de honore de Wybb' per servicium militare de veteri feffamento.

In eadem vill' vj. pars feodi quam Johannes filius Hugonis tenet de honore de Wibb' eodem modo ut prius.

In Monintun' feod' integrum quem Ruardus Maubanc et Ricardus Fuke tenent per servicium militare de domino Roberto Tregoz de honore de Ewyas de veteri feffamento. Breve.

In Thurneistun' dimidius feodus quem Ricardus de Anesie de honore de Snodhull' per servicium militare de eodem feffamento.

In Puttestun' dimidius feodus quem Walterus de Scudimor [1] de Godefrido de Scudimor, et Godefridus de Gamag' et Godefridus de Gamages de honore de Bocred. Regina habet breve.

In Wirkebroc iiija pars feodi quam Walterus de Evereus tenet de honore de Snodhull' per servicium militare de veteri feffamento.

In eadem vill' decima pars feodi quam Thomas de Chamflur tenet de honore de Snodhull'.

In Wulmestun' et Thurlokeshope dimidius feodus quem heredes Ricardi de Chandos tenent de eodem honore.

In Haya Hurri dimidius feodus quem Rogerus de Haya tenet de honore de Snodhull' per servicium ut prius.

In Dorsintun' unum feodum quem Willelmus de Solar' tenet de Waltero de Clifford, et Walterus de Clifford de Radulfo de Thony per servicium ut prius et de veteri feffamento. Breve.

In Bradwardin feodus militis quem Rogerus de Evereus et participes sui tenent de comite Herefordie de honore de Brechinnou per servicium militare de veteri feffamento. Breve.

In Mocres dimidius feodua quem Hugo de Fraxino tenet de comite Herefordie de honore de Kingtun' de veteri feffamento per servicium militare. Breve.

In Webbetun', Cobbewell', la Mare feodus militis quem heredes Michaelis de Kirketot tenent de honore de Webbel' per servicium militare de veteri feffamento.


[1] After Scudimor supply tenet; and after Godefridus supply de Godefrido.

812 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.22.I.281-312 - cont.

In Kingestun' feodus militis quem Willelmus de Furches tenet de comite Herefordie de honore de Breckynnou de veteri feffamento per servicium mllitere. Breve.

In Arclestun' vja pars feodi quam Robertus de Westun' tenet de Henrico de Burhope, et idem Henricus de heredibus Henrici de Longo Campo de honore de Wyltun' de veteri feffamento per servicium militare.

In Hutun' feodus militis quem heredes Walteri de Scotot tenent per servicium militare de honore de Wybbeleg.

In Thurlestun' iiija pars feodi quam Rogerus Pichard tenet de comite Herefordie de honore de Kaudicot. Breve.

In Hunegarestun' et Malefeld tercia pars feodi quam Robertus le Rus tenet de manerio domini regis de Dylun per servicium militare de veteri feffamento.

In Clehangre iij. hyde, unde Willelmus de Broyntun' dimidiam hydam de domino episcopo Herefordensi pro secta curie de veteri feffamento, Robertus Thurbelvile, Hugo de Crofta, Cecilla de Hereford, Rogerus de Cotes, Ailmundus molendinarius alteram medietatem dicte hyde, set nesciunt juratores servicium coram. Item Willelmus de Broyntun' dimidiam hydam de dono comitis Herefordie pro secta curie, et Robertus de Thurbel' et socii sui prenominati alteram medietatem faciendo unam oblacionem vij. solidorum super altare Sancti Athelberti. Episcopus.

In Bullingehope.

In Rudrewas continentur due hyde quas Ricardus de Welles tenet de Willelmo de la Mare, et idem Willelmus de honore de Gloucestria per socagium, reddendo annuatim unam marcam-argenti.

In Dunre continentur due partes feodi quas Walterus de Dunre tenet de honore de Clifford, et Walterus de Clifford de heredibus de Thony per servicium militare de veteri feffamento. Breve.

In Hamme Lacy feodus militis et dimidii quem canonici Herefordie tenent de heredibus Walteri de Lacy, et Walterus de Lacy de episcopia Herefordensibus per servicium militare de novo feffamento ex parte canonicorum. Episcopus.

Item in eadem villa dimidius feodus, unde Willelmus de Evereus medietatem ipsius dimidii feodi per servicium militare de heredibus de Lacy de veteri feffamento, et heredes Walteri de Lacy alteram medietatem ipsius dimidii feodi tenent de honore de Webbel.

[Six slits for tags for the seals of the jurors for two hundreds.]

In libro.

S.ij.22.I.314-322.

Scutagium domine regine de Honore Toenei [1] et Clifford per breve.

Breve. [2]

Matheus de Mauns tenet in villa de Standun' j. feodum.

Johannes de Turberville tenet in Deuwewell' dimidium feodum.


[1] See Close Rolls, 1237-1242, p. 422.
[2] This word appears to be substituted for in rotulo.

HEREFORD. 813

S.ij.22.I.314-322 - cont.

Willelmus de Solariis tenet in villa de Dorsinton' j. feodum. Non potest distringi per vicecomitem Herefordie.

Walterus de Dunre in villa de Dunre duas partes feodi.

Willelmus de Heume in villa de Hanley vtam partem feodi.

Hugo de Mortuo Mari apud Rocheford dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Mapenoure in villa de Hamton' dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Forda tenet in Samesfeld et Forde dimidium feodum.

Andreas de Parva Astfeld tenet apud Astfeld xmam partem feodi.

Hugo de Hammens tenet in Hammens vtam partem feodi.

Walterus de Riffey in villa de Bradefeld iiijtam partem feodi.

Willelmus de Hamme tenet in villa de Hamme dimidium feodum.

Walterus de Scudemor in villa de Puteston' dimidium feodum.

Feoda Honoris de Dylun. Sine breve.

Robertus Mallure tenet in Dylun dimidium feodum.

Hugo de Crophte tenet in Waverton', Neuton' quartam partem feodi.

Adam Malherbe in villa de Risebur' viijvam partem feodi.

Willelmus Devereus in Lunteleye dimidium feodum.

Robertus le Rus tenet in villa de Dylun iiijtam partem feodi.

In rotulo.

Feoda Comitis Herefordie per breve. Breve.

Johannes de Sancto Aubino tenet in Middelton' vtam partem feodi.

Johannes de Waldebuf tenet in villa de Caderhope dimidium feodum.

Matheus de Mauns in Humbre dimidium feodum.

Walterus Devereus et Walterus de Muchegros in villa de Bodenham dimidium feodum.

Johannes le Moine tenet in Rughedun' dimidium feodum.

Robertus le Wafre tenet in Tedethorn pro iiijta parte feodi.

Willelmus de Mare in Thedesthorne j. feodum.

Walterus de Avenebur' tenet in Avenebur' j. feodum.

Thomas de Fenna tenet in villa de Fenna dimidium feodum.

Elena Pancefot tenet in Mangna Couerna j. feodum.

Heredes Thome de Fraxino in Parva Couerna dimidium feodum.

Hugo de Fraxino in Sutton' et in Maghene dimidium feodum.

Rogerus Devereus et participes aui tenent in Bradewardin j. feodum.

Hugo de Fraxino tenet in Mocres dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Furches tenet in villa de Kingeston' j. feodum.

Rogerus Pichard tenet in Turneston' iiijtam partem feodi.

Milo Puchard tenet in villa de Burghelton' dimidium feodum.

Elizabet de Gamages et Batillis soror eius in villa de Burhull' j. feodum.

Reginaldus de Mara tenet in Parva Hereford ij. feoda.

Hugo de Kilpec tenet in Lastres dimidium feodum.

814 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.22.I.314-322 - cont.

Rogerus Franciscus et Johannes Franciscus ibidem dimidium feodum.

Matheus le Brut in villa de Weston' iiijtam partem feodi.

Feoda Roberti Tregoz per breve. Breve.

Robertus Tregoz tenet in villa de Eton' j. feodum.

Riuwardus Maugant [1] in villa de Moniton' j. feodum.

Robertus de Wyteney et Thomas de Hamegrave tenent in villa de Pencumbe ij. feoda.

Feoda Rogeri de Chandeus de Honore de Snodhull'.

Sine breve.

Rogerus de Chandeus in villa de Faghehop.

Ricardus de Anesy tenet in Turneston' dimidium feodum.

Walterus Devereus in Wirkebroc iiijtam partem feodi.

Thomas de Chanflur ibidem xmam partem feodi.

Heredes Ricardi de Chaundes tenent in Wlmeaton' et Thurlokeshop' dimidium feodum.

Rogerus de Haya in Haya Wiri dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Scolle in villa de Stretton' xmam partem feodi.

Gilbertus Talebot in villa de Credehulle dimidium feodum.

Johannes de Liggheine in villa de Kenescestre xmam partem feodi.

Ricardus de Bagginghedene in villa de Wddeton' vtam partem feodi.

Rogerus de Chaundeus in villa de Welinton' j. feodum.

In rotulo.

Feoda Radulfi de Mortuo Mari de Honore de Wighemore. Sine breve.

Willelmus de Bledis tenet in Stok' de Blez dimidium feodum.

Brianus de Brompton' tenet in villa de Eston' j. feodum.

Rogerus de Sarnesfeld in villa de Sarnesfeld xxmam partem feodi.

Radulfus de Mortuo Mari in Halreton' et Thomas de Careswell j. feodum.

Ricardus de Kinardesley in villa de Kinardesley j. feodum.

Walterus de Hopton' et Andreas de Stanton' in villa de Stanton' j. feodum.

Abbas de Wighemore in villa de Scobbedun' j. feodum.

Bertholomeus de Scobbedun' ibidem dimidium feodum.

Rogerus Beausire in Covenhope iiijtam partem feodi.

Robertus Devereus in villa de Leye dimidium feodum.

Smundus de Burley in villa de Burley j. feodum.

Radulfus de Mortuo Mari in Kingheslon', Horleslon', Burton', Henton', Tullord ij. feoda et dimidium et iiijtam partem feodi.

Henricus de Penebrugg' cum villls adjacentibus j. feodum.

Katerina de Lacy in villa de Maumeshull' j. feodum.

In rotulo.


[1] Read Maubane.

HEREFORD. 815

S.ij.22.I.314-322 - cont.

Feoda de Castro Ricardi. Sine breve.

Ricardus de Cursun tenet in Brockmanton' vtam partem feodi.

Johannes de Sturmi tenet ad Castrum Ricardi dimidium feodum.

Ricardus de Kinardesloys ibidem iiijtam partem feodi.

Jurdanus de Ludeford ibidem iiijtam partem feodi.

Ricardus de Cursun in Puttlesdun' tenet pro tribus partibus feodi.

Philippus de Sarnesfeld per socagium xmam partem feodi.

Adam de Colinton' in villa de Colinton' iiijtam partem feodi.

Rogerus de Maghene in Maghene Mauricii vtam partem feodi.

Johannes le Moine tenet in Salebiri xvjmam partem feodi.

In rotulo.

Scutagium Herberti filii Petri de Honore de Blenleveni. Habet breve. Non allocatur quia non transfretavit.

Petrus de Watteville in villa de Longeford xmam partem feodi.

Radulfus Torel in Brunhop' dimidium feodum.

Herbertus filius Petri in villa de Tullinton' dimidium feodum.

In rotulo.

Scutagium Honoris de Cormailles. Sine breve.

Walterus de Solariis tenet in villa de Hopesolar j. feodum. H. Giffard.

Hugo de Pikesley tenet in villa de Pikesley vtam partem feodi.

Johannes le Brun, Hugo Giffard, Robertus le Archer, Simon de Solariis in villa de Tatinton' j. feodum.

Rogerus de Eston' in villa de Eston' j. feodum.

In rotulo.

Feoda Honoris de Kilpec. Sine breve.

Elyanora de Parco tenet in villa de Parco dimidium feodum.

Walterus de Iatton' tenet in villa de Iatton' dimidium feodum.

Margeria de Solariis tenet in villa de Hopton' vtam partem feodi.

In rotulo.

Feoda Comit' de Fairaros. [1] Sine breve.

Hugo le Butiler tenet in villa de Thombur' dimidium feodum.

In rotulo.

Feoda Honoris de Munemue. Sine breve.

Ricardus de Fago tenet in villa de Maineston' vtam partem feodi.

Johannes de Munemue tenet in villa de Asperton' et Stratton' j. feodum.

Heredes Michaelis de Crichetot in villa de Walsopethorne vtam partem feodi.

In rotulo.


[1] This is copied in the Book (I.318) as Com' de Stureres. Read, however, Philippi de Columbariis.

816 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.22.I.314-322 - cont.

Feoda Honoris de Teukesbur'. Sine breve.

Simund de Clinton' tenet in villa de Pikesley xmam partem feodi.

In rotulo.

Feoda Honoris de Neubiri. Sine breve. Breve.

Ysabella de Penebrugg' tenet in villa de Catesley. Non dat scutagium.

Feoda Honoris de Marcley.

Johannes de Balun tenet in villa de Mangna Marcley j. feodum.

Reginaldus de Mara ibidem dimidium feodum.

Jurdanus Avenel ibidem vtam partem feodi.

In rotulo.

Feoda Honoris de Wylton per breve. Breve.

Robertus de Weston' in Iarcleston' vjtam partem feodi.

Feoda Honoris Warini de Monte Chanesi per breve. Breve,

Henricus de Munemue in villa de Frome Henrici v. partem feodi.

Feoda Honoris de Bedeford. Sine breve.

Hugo filius Bernardi et Robertus de Fuleham tenent in villa de Iatton xmam partem feodi.

In rotulo.

Summa feodorum huius rotuli lvi. feoda et x. pars feodi.

Summa denariorum cxij.l. iiij.s. ij.d.

Feoda quondam Walteri de Lacy. Sine breve.

Ricardus de Urtesl' tenet in villa de Leaon', [1] j. feodum.

Rogerus Pichard tenet in villa de Almeley j. feodum.

Willelmus de Ebroicis tenet in villa de Lonhalles j. feodum.

Willelmus Pichard tenet in villa de Merston' dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Aufreton' tenet in villa de Ledecote v. partem feodi.

Thomas de Streta tenet in villa de Streta terciam partem feodi.

Willelmus de Ebroicis tenet in villa de Lauton' vtam partem feodi.

Philippus de Sarnesfeld tenet in villa de Sueineston' terciam partem feodi.

Hugo de Verli et Walterus de Eynesford tenent in villa de Pyonia j. feodum.

Margeria de Lacy tenet in villa de Webbel' j. feodum.

Johannes de Bikerton' tenet in villa de Bikerton' dimidium feodum.

Rogerus Tirel in villa de Parva Markerl' j. feodum.

Henricus de Wodhull' et Thomas de Feipo tenent in villa de Munesley dimidium feodum


[1] Read Letton.

HEREFORD. 817

S.ij.22.I.314-322 - cont.

Gilbertus de Lacy de Froma Castri tenet unum feodum.

Walterus Hamund tenet in villa de Maghene decimam partem feodi.

Stephanus de Esebach' tenet in villa de Esebach' vtam partem feodi.

Ysabella Devereus tenet in villa de Froma Hamund dimidium feodum.

Ricardus de Hyda tenet in villa Ricardi vtam partem feodi et in Wytewyk'.

Ricardus de Urtesleys tenet dimidium feodum in villa de Witewicke.

Robertus de Weston' tenet in vfila de Weston' vtam partem feodi.

Petronilla de Toeney tenet in villa de Iarculn' j. feodum.

Walterus de Brocbur' tenet in villa de Brocburi vtam partem feodi.

Milo Pichard tenet in villa de Standun' j. feodum.

Walterus de Urmesleys tenet in villa de Stand' dimidium feodum.

Godefridus de Gamages tenet apud Maumesulle Gamages j. feodum.

Johannes de Cnulla, Matilda de Tregoz, Walterus de Bodenham tenent in villa de Buford j. feodum.

Walterus de Bascreville tenet in villa de Iagesoure duas partes feodi.

Willelmus de Caple tenet in villa de Urmesleys vtam partem feodi.

Walterus de Bascreville tenet in villa de Stretton' vtam partem feodi.

Amabilia et heredes Walteri de Muchegros tenent in villa de Luda xmam partem feodi.

Ricardus de Fepo in eadem villa xmam partem feodi.

Abbas Gloucestrie in Lude Sausey dimidium feodum.

Rogerus Tirel tenet in villa de Urmeton' dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Sausey tenet in Urmeton' dimidium feodum.

Ricardus de Hamton' tenet in villa de Bachinton' j. feodum.

Nicholaus de Ebroicis tenet in villa de Cheineston' j. feodum.

Johannes Ragim [1] tenet in eadem villa vjtam partem feodi.

Heredes Walteri de Scotot tenent in villa de Hutton' j. feodum.

{Willelmus de Ebroicis tenet in villa de Hamelacy. Cancelled.}

Willelmus de Furches tenet in villa de Bodeham iiijtam partem feodi.

Rogerus de Bodeham tenet in villa de Bodeham xmam partem feodi.

Ysabella de Ebroicis tenet Maghene Aubin iiijtam partem feodi.

Johannes de Winterkote et Walterus [2] de Bradeley tenent in villa de Merston' iiijtam partem feodi.

Walterus de Stanford tenet in villa de Stanford vjtam partem feodi.

Johannes de Grendene tenet in villa de Grendene iiijtam partem feodi.

Willelmus de Cairdif tenet in villa de Wakinton' dimidium feodum.

Rogerus Anglicus tenet in Ulfreslauwe j. feodum.


[1] Read Ragun.
[2] Andreas in the original inquisition above.

818 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.22.I.314-322 - cont.

Walterus Muntrich tenet in villa de Muntrich iiijtam partem feodi.

Willelmus de Ebroicis tenet in villa de Stok' Lacy iiij. partem feodi.

Rogerus Pichard tenet in Hacle Pichard iij. partes feodi.

Ricardus de Hamton' tenet in Hamton' pro iijtus partibus j. feodi.

Philippus de Sarnesfeld tenet in villa de Sarnesfeld dimidium feodum.

Cecilia de Ebroicis tenet in villa de Putteley vtam partem feodi.

Heredes Henrici de Landa tenent in villa de Wyle iiijtam partem feodi.

Elyas Clericus, Ricardus le Coc, et participes eorum tenent iiijtam partem feodi ibidem.

Totum in rotulo.

Summa xxvij. feoda, dimidia, quarta pars feodi.

Summa feodorum huius rotuli xxvij. feoda et dimidia et v. pars et xxiiija pars.

Summa denariorum lv.l. ix.s. viij.d.

Summa summarum feodorum tocius huiut, rotuli iiijxxiij. feoda et dimidia et quinta pars et decima pars et xxiiij pars.

Summa summarum omnium denariorum huius rotuli clxvij.l. xiij.s. et x.d.

[On the dorse:-] Summa omnium feodorum sine breve xxviij. feoda sine Webbel'.

Summa omnium denariorum sine breve sine Webbel' lvj.l. xix.s. vj.d.

Summa omnium feodorum de Webbel' xxvij. feoda et dimidia et vta pars et xxiiija pars.

Summa omnium denariorum de Webbel' lv.l. ix.s. iiij.d. [1]

Summa omnium feodorum tocius comitatus sine breve lv. feoda et dimidia et vta pars et xxiiij. pars.

Summa omnium feodorum tocius comitatus sine breve cxj.l. ix.s. iiij.d.

Summa de scaccario cxvij.l. vj.s. iiij.d.

Summa arreragii ...

Glouc. Hereff', Henrici tercii.

Continet xx. pecias.

Non inveni nisi novem decim pectus et unum breve et unam sedulam que incipit Inquirantur, et liberate fuerunt nichi die Jovis proxima ante festum Annunciucionis Beate Marie apud Salebroc, quo die redii de Wallia. [2]

Gloucestr', Herford in Wallia. In libro.

GLOUCESTER.

I. 372-373.

RECEPTA DE SCUTAGIO WASCONIE IN BALLIVA CIRENCESTRIE.

De Radulfo de Lech de uno feodo integro in Estlech de feodo comitis Gloucestrie. xl.s.


[1] Altered from viij.d. which is apparently correct.
[2] This note appears to have been made by Nicholas of Warwick, surveyor of the Aid of 1303 in the counties of Gloucester and Hereford.

GLOUCESTER. 819

I.372-373 - cont.

De Ricardo de Baggind' de dimidio feodo et xija parte j. feodi in Baggingeden' de feodo Rogeri de Chandos, xxiij.s. iiij.d.

De Cecilia de Evereus et Galliana de Turvile de ij. feodis in Estlech de feodo Walteri de Lacy, iiijor l.

De Gilberto de Schipton' de uno feodo militis in Schipton' de feodo Willelmi Monachi, xl.s.

De Willelmo de Mara de ij. feodis et dimidio et tercia parte unius feodi in Rindecumbe, Cernay, Kalemundesden et Truabur' de feodo comitis Gloucestrie, cxiij.s. viij.d.

De Willelmo de Lesseberg' de uno feodo militis in Lesseberg' de feodo Willelmi de Kaines. xl.s.

De Willelmo de Rodmerton' pro tercia parte feodi unius militis in Rodmerton' de feodo Willelmi de Kaines, j.m.

De Ranulpho de Cotes de j. feodo militis in Cotes de feodo Walteri de Lacy, xl.s.

De Fulcone Cokerel pro dimidio feodo militis in Cotes de feodo Radulfi Russel, xx.s.

De Galfrido Martel pro dimidio feodo militis in Stawell' de feodo Willelmi de Hasting', xx.s.

De Ricardo de Hampton' de uno feodo militis in Stratton' de feodo Walteri de Lacy, xl.s.

De Ada Kaily et Thoma de Gardino de uno feodo militis in Side et Gardino de feodo Johannis le Brun, xl.s.

De Lucia de Cormailes de uno feodo militis in Wineston' de feodo Johannis le Brun, xl.s.

De Roberto de Meysi de dimidio feodo militis in Hampton' de feodo comitis Gloucestrie, xx.s.

De Christiana de Mutton' de dimidio feodo militis in Torinton' de feodo Willelmi de Hastinges, xx.s.

De Ricardo Tirel de j. feodo militis in Schipton' de feodo Rogeri de Chandos, xl.s.

De Ricardo le Bret pro iij. parte feodi j. militis in Weston' de feodo Hugonis de Kylpec, j.m.

De Galfrido de Langel' de dimidio feodo in Suthint' de feodo Walteri de Lacy, xx.s.

Summa xxxiij.l. iij.s. viij.d.

OXFORD.

S.ij.23.

Henricus dei gracia rex Anglie, dominus Hybernie, dux Normannie, Aquitanie et comes Andegavie, vicecomiti Oxonie, salutem. Datum est nobis intelligi quod plures sunt in comitatu tuo qui tenent per servicia militaria tam de nobis quam de aliis qui tenent de nobis in capite qui contradicunt solvere nobis scutagia de feodis suis et dicunt quod non tenent per servicia militaria neque de nobis neque de aliis qui de nobis tenent in capite. Et quia scutagia nobis sunt concessa per commune consilium regni nostri tam de novo feoffamento quam de veteri, tibi precipimus quod diligentem facias inquisicionem in comitatu tuo, tam infra libertates quam extra

820 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23 - cont.

per sacramentum xij. liberoram et legalium hominum, tam militum quam aliorum, per quos rei veritas melius sciri poterit, et qui tales sint quod nos ad eos capere possimus si in aliquo deliquerint, quot feoda teneantur tam de nobis quam de aliis qui de nobis tenent in capite tam de novo feffamento quam de veteri, et distringas illos qui feoda illa teneant ad reddendum nobia scutagia sua de feodis suis, ita quod tu habeas eadem scutagia coram baronibus de scaccario nostro apud Westmonasterium a die Sancti Hyllarii in xv. dies, et inquisicionem et hoc breve. Teste A. thesaurario Sancti Pauli London' apud Westmonasterium xij. die Decembris anno regni nostri xxvij.

S.ij.23.I.459-473.

Inquisicio [1] facta de feodis que tenentur de domino rege et de tenentibus de domino rege in capite per servicia militaria tam de novo feffamento quam de veteri in comitatu Oxonie, per sacramentum proborum et legalium hominum subscriptorum, scilicet Widonis filii Roberti, Nicholai de Nodariis, Johannis le Mir', Willelmi Wace, Gillberti de la Hide, Ricardi de Prestekot', Rogeri Gernun, Radulfi de Saumford', Willelmi de Scalebroc, Johannis de Parles, Willelmi de Andely, et Willelmi Leuk'.

HUNDREDUM DE WOTTON.

Dunthrop. Abbas de Bruera tenet feodum unius militis de Willelmo de Kaynes, et idem Willelmus in capite de rege.

Magna Tywa. Radulfus de Preaus tenet quartam partem feodi unius militis in capite de comite Arundell', et idem comes de domino rege.

Baldewinus de Ver tenet in eadem villa xxam partem feodi unius militis in capite de rege.

Rogerus de Sumeri tenet in eadem centum solidatas terre de dono comitis Arundell'; non potest inquiri utrum terra illa sit dimidium feodum militis an plus vel minus.

Parva Tywa. Abbas de Osen' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo comitis Insule, et idem comes in capite de rege.

Newenton'. Radulfus Ivaus tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de comite Insule, et ipse in capite de rege.

Idem Radulfus tenet aliud feodum militis de feodo Arsik in eadem. Agnes de Maydewell' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de Willelmo de Dive, et idem Willelmus de comite Insule in capite, et comes de rege.

Bereford' Chayney. Agnes de Maydewell' tenet feodum unius militis de Willelmo de Dive de feodo Comitis Ricardi de honore de Sancto Walerico.


[1] This inquisition had on the margin in many cases a note of the chief lord of the particular fee described. These notes, however, are not part of the inquisition, but were added to it by a different scribe. They give no further information and have not been reprinted here.

OXFORD. 821

S.ij.23.I.459-473 - cont.

Bereford' Olof. Robertus de Pirenho tenet dimidium feodum unius militis de feodo Johannis +de Lacy,+ et idem Johannes de rege in capite.

Yeleberi. Basily de Bereford' tenet unam carucatam terre de Ricardo de Stratton' pro tribus marcis per annum de feodo Hervici Baggot; non potest inquiri utrum terra illa sit dimidium feodum unius militis an plus vel minus, nunquam dedit scutagium.

Daddinton'. Willelmus de Dive et Radulfus Haring tenent feodum duorum militum in eadem villa in capite de rege.

Dunstiwe. Hugo de Tiwe tenet in eadem et in Edberbur' et in Swereford' duo feoda militum, scilicet unum feodum de Willelmo Cantilupo de baronia Doyli et aliud feodum de feodo Hervici de Stafford'.

Northeston'. Robertus de Eston' tenet feodum unius militis de comite Saresberie, et idem comes in capite de rege.

Middeleston'. Ada de Brimpton' tenet dimidium feodum militis de feodo Hervici de Stafford'.

Stepeleston'. Alanus de Rumily tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de Rogero de Leyburn' de feodo comitis Insule.

Netherhorton'. Johannes filius Henrici tenet dimidium feodum de Fulk' Basset, et pertinet ad villam de Curtlinton', et idem F. de rege in capite.

Westcote Berton'. Hugo Paynel tenet in warda feodum unius militis in eadem de Willelmo de Caynes, et idem Willelmus tenet in capite de rege cum una hida terre in Parva Tywa.

Magna Berton'. Rogerus de Sancto Johanne tenet feodum unius militis in eadem et in Stanton' in capite de rege.

Berton' Odonis. Ricardus de Berton' tenet feodum unius militis in eadem et in Dunstiwe de Johanna Arsik, et ipsa de rege in capite.

Tackele. Thomas Maunsel et Alexander de Ovill' tenent in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo comitis Arundell', et comes de rege.

Withulle. Philippus de Withulle tenet in eadem tres partes feodi unius militis de Comite Ricardo de feodo de Sancto Walerico.

Glinton'. Willelmus de Moun tenet feodum unius militis de feodo Willelmi de Bruere, et idem Willelmus in capite de rege.

Nethercudinton'. Leticia de Sausey tenet dimidium feodum militis de feodo Walteri de Lacy, et idem Walterus in capite de rege.

Eadem Letitia tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de feodo Willelmi de Stutevill', et idem Willelmus in capite de rege.

Hensinton'. Willelmus Langhals tenet in eadem tres virgatas terre de Willelmo de Cantilupo de feodo Doyli pertinentes ad Cudelinton'.

Sipton'. Simon Scorchebuf tenet dimidium feodum militis in eadem de feodo comitis Lincolnie, et comes de rege de honore Pontis Frigidi.

Johannes de Peuton' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de comite Wyntonie, et comes de rege in capite.

Demeford'. Eva de Gray tenet feodum unius militis de feodo comitis Insule, et idem comes in capite de rege.

822 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.459-473.

Cudelinton'. Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet totam villam que est de dote Matillidis uxoris sue de feodo Doly.

Bekebroc. Matillis de Leus et priorissa de Stodley tenent feodum unius militis de Radulfo de Sausey de feodo W. de Lacy, et idem W. de rege.

Kersinton'. Willelmus de Paris tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo Arsik.

Idem Willelmus tenet in eadem terciam partem unius feodi unius militis de feodo comitis Lincolnie de honore Pontis Frigidi.

Willelmus filius Petri tenet in eadem tres partes feodi unius militis de feodo comitis Lincolnie de honore Pontis Frigidi.

Johannes le Brun tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de Comite Ricardo de honore de Sancto Walerico.

Stanton'. Ricardus de Harrecurt tenet in eadem feodum unius militis in capite de rege.

Coges est capud de baronia Arsik. Archiepiscopus Eboracensis et Thomas de la Hay tenent totam villam; non potest inquiri utrum pro aliquo feodo neene.

HUNDREDUM DE BAMPTON'.

Bradewell'. Gerardus de Oddingeseles et Gerardus de Lindesi tenent duo feoda militum in eadem in capite de rege.

Westwell', Eleford', Alwaldesberi. Willelmus de Hatinges [1] tenet unum feodum militis et dimidium in capite de rege.

Bureford' est in manu domini regis et fuit dominicum comitis Glovernie.

Estalle est dominieum Ricardi Comitis spectans ad baroniam de Sancto Walerico.

Norton'. Johannes le Brun tenet tres partes feodi unius militis de Comite Ricardo de honore de Sancto Walerico.

Stephanus de Fritewell' tenet in eadem tres partes feodi unius militis de eodem honore.

Johannes de Tiwe tenet quintam partem feodi unius militis de eodem honore.

Burton'. Episcopus Norwicensis tenet feodum unius militis de eodem honore, unde Radulfus Haring est medius.

Eva de Gray et Beatrix de Murdac tenent in eadem dimidium feodum militis de Patricio de Chawrch', et idem Patricius de rege in capite.

Abbas de Osen' tenet in eadem quartam partem feodi unius militis de Eva de Gray de feodo comitis Insule, et comes de rege.

Clanefeld. Jacobus le Sauvage tenet in eadem quartam partem feodi unius militis de Radulfo Haring de honore de Sancto Walerico.

Alicia de Cheyney tenet in eadem quartam partem feodi unius militis de eodem Radulfo et de eodem honore.

Philippa de Kranefeld' tenet in eadem et in Putte dimidium feodum militis de eodem Radulfo et de eodem honore.


[1] Read Hastinges.

OXFORD. 823

S.ij.23.I.459-473 - cont.

Heredes Willelmi Bayuel tenent in eadem terciam partem feodi unius militis de eodem Radulfo et de eodem honore.

Rethcot'. Simon de Averenches tenet quartam partem feodi unius militis in capite de rege.

Bampton'. Rogerus Doyly tenet duo feoda militum de Willelmo Cantilupo de feodo Doyly de dote uxoris sue.

Imbertus Pugeis tenet in eadem xxxta librataa terre de terra que fuit comitis Bolonie.

Idem Imbertus tenet residuum eiusdem ville cum hundredo ad firmam de rege pro xxxvij.l. per annum.

Stanlak. Eva de Gray tenet feodum unius militis de comite Insule, et idem comes in capite de rege.

Dukelindon'. Willelmus de Dive tenet duo feoda militum in eadem de comitissa de Warwik' de feodo Doyly.

Wytteney et Cradebrege sunt in manu domini regis et spectant ad baroniam episcopi Wyntoniensis.

HUNDREDUM DE BLOKESHAM.

Edburberi. Henricus de Lingiuere tenet unum feodum militis in eadem in capite de rege.

Radulfus de Sancto Amando tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis in capite de rege.

Abbas de Cyrencestr' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis in capite de rege.

Bodikot'. Johannes de Holkot' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo comitis Marescalli, et comes de rege.

Bereford' Parva. Willelmus de Dyve tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis ad perficienda duo feoda que tenet in Dukelindon'.

Winginton'. Wydo filius Roberti tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de comitissa de Warwik' de feodo Doyly.

Sybeford'. Thomas Goher tenet feodum unius militis in eadem de feodo com' de Warwik'.

Simon Vitor et abbas de Osen' tenent feodum unius militis in eadem de feodo comitis Wyntonie, et comes de rege.

Hanewey. Warinus de Vernun tenet dimidium feodum militis in eadem de feodo comitis Wintonie, et comes de rege.

Balescot'. Prior de Wroskestan', Willelmus Leuk', Robertus de Cerceden' et magister Simon de Wauton' tenent feodum unius militis in eadem de Johanna Arsik, et ipsa de rege in capite.

Haulington'. Matheus de Codrey tenet feodum unius militis de Radulfo de Sancto Amando, et idem Radulfus de rege.

Hugo filius Henrici de Abbendon' tenet in eadem feodum dimidii militis de Comite Ricardo de honore de Walingeford'.

Wrockeston'. Prior de Wrockeston' tenet feodum unius militis de feodo Wichardi Leydet de honore de Roginham.

Hornele et Hornintton'. Johannes de Lexinton' tenet dimidium feodum militis de dono Roberti de Lexinton' de honore de Braundon' de Roys de Verdoyn, et ipsa de rege in capite.

Draiton'. Eustacia de Arderne tenet totam villam in dotem; non potest inquiri utrum sit dimidium feodum militis vel plus vel minus.

824 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.459-473 - cont.

Brochton' et Newenton'. Johannes de Brochton' et Johannes Dunheved tenent tria feoda militum de parvis feodis de Moretoyn.

Blokesham. Radulfus de Sancto Amando tenet in eadem feodum unius militis in capite de rege.

Rex tenet in eadem in dominico duo feoda militum.

Mollinton'. Radulfus de Cestreton' tenet feodum unius militis de honore Peverel in capite de rege.

R. [1] Lincolniensis episcopus tenet hundredum de Bannebur' et hundredum de Tham' et hundredum de Dorkecestr' in capite de rege, in quibus ballivi sui non permittunt vicecomitem intrare ad inquisicionem faciendam.

HUNDREDUM DE POKHEDELOWE.

Lillingestan'. Walterus de Oiney et Thomas Barbator tenent quartam partem unius feodi militis de honore de Benefeld.

Finemere. Robertus de Chaundos, Willelmus de Bosco, David de Bovendon' tenent feodum unius militis de feodo comitis Glovernie, et comes de rege.

Turesmere, Mauricius de Aundely tenet in eadem dimidium feodum unius militis de Wydone filio Roberti de feodo Doyly.

Folewell'. Abbas de Osen' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de Rogero de Aumari de feodo Doyly.

Bukehell' et Blechesdon'. Rogerus de Aumar' tenet feoda duorum militum de feodo Doyly.

Ricardus de Prestekot' tenet in Blechesdon' dimidium feodum militis de parvo feodo de Moretoin de feodo Hervici Baggot.

Mixseberi. Abbas de Osen' tenet feodum unius militis et dimidium feodum in eadem de Comite Ricardo in capite.

Newenton'. Robertus Purcel tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de abbate de Osen' de honore de Sancto Walerico.

Johannes filius Ricardi filii Nigelli tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de Alicia de Bendinges, et ipsa de comite Glovernie, et comes de rege.

Saldewell'. Alicia de Bendinges tenet dimidium feodum militis de comite Glovernie, et comes de rege in capite.

Wilaston'. Comes Ricardus tenet in dominico dimidium feodum militis de baronia de Sancto Walerico.

Stok'. Episcopus Norwicensis tenet feodum unius militis de feodo comitis Marescalli, et comes de rege in capite.

Robertus de Eyvile tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de feodo comitis Marescalll, et idem de rege in capite.

Herdwik'. Willelmus de Aundely tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo Henrici Doyly.

Feringeford'. Willelmus Bozon tenet totam villam in dotem cum uxore sua de feodo Arsik.

Hethe. Rosea de Verdoyn tenet dimidium feodum militis in Haze [2] de feodo comitis Glovernie.


[1] The whole of this entry is an insertion.
[2] Read Hathe. This scribe uses a z or Z for a p.

OXFORD. 826

S.ij.23.I.459-473 - cont.

Mudelinton'. Willelmus Longespey tenet quartam partem feodi unius militis in capite de rege

Goddindon'. Rogerus de Witcestr' tenet quartam partem feodi unius militis in eadem de Willelmo Longespey, et Willelmus de rege in capite.

[Ten slits for tags for the seals of the jurors.]

Sumerton'. Stephanus filius Simeon et Thomas de la Hay tenent totam villam in capite de rege de baronia de Arsik; non potest inquiri pro quanto feodo.

Northbroc. Stephanus Simeon et Thomas de la Hae tenent dimidium feodum militis in eadem de Wydone filio Roberti, et ipse de comite Cestrie in capite, et idem de rege de honore Pontis Frigidi.

Ardulvele. Wydo filius Roberti tenet in eadem dimidium feodum unius militis de comite Cestrie, et comes de rege in capite de honore Pontis Frigidi.

Ottindon'. Johannes le Pouere tenet dimidium feodum militis de abbate de Westmonasterio.

Lake. Saunsum Folioht tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de comite Insule, et comes de rege in capite.

Hampton'. Willelmus de Hampton' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis in capite de rege.

Hampton' Gay. Abbas de Osen' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis, scilicet medietatem de honore de Sancto Walerico et aliam medietatem de comite Glovernie.

Sexinton'. Willelmus de Blakevil' tenet in eadem octavam partem feodi unius militis de Thoma Buffin, et idem Thomas de rege in capite.

Curtlinton'. Fulco Basset tenet in eadem et in Horton' et in Bikehell' quartam partem feodi unius militis in capite de rege.

Matheus de [1] Curtlinton' tenet in eadem quartam partem feodi unius militis de feodo Henrici Doyly ad perficiendum duo feoda in Dukelindon.

Petrus de Doniton' tenet in eadem quartam partem feodi unius militis de feodo Henrici Doyly.

Northbrok. Ada de [1] Gay tenet in eadem quartam partem feodi unius militis de abbate de Westmonasterio.

Hanredde. [2] Lucia [3] que fuit uxor Ricardi de Hanredde tenet in dotem in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo comitis Glovernie.

Petrus de la Mare tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de honore de Walingeford'.

Heyford Magna. Margeria de Ripariis tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de honore de Walingeford'.

Fretewell'. Radulfus filius Nicholai tenet in eadem quartam partem feodi unius militis de feodo de Arsik.

Rogerus Folioht tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de comite Insule.

Laurencius de Broc tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de Rogero Folioth, et idem Rogerus de comite Insule.


[1] For de read le.
[2] Read Heyford.
[3] Leticia in the abstract, p. 836.

826 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.459-473 - cont.

Wendleberi. Hamund de Sancta Fide tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de Sawallo de Osevile, et ipse de comite Herefordie.

Willelmus filius Amaurici tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo comitis Herefordie.

Stratton'. Sibilla Gargat tenet in eadem quartam partem feodi unius militis de comite Warennie, et idem comes de rege in capite.

HUNDREDUM DE BULENDEN.

Saumford'. Radulfus de Saumford' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo abbatis de Abbendon', et idem abbas de rege in capite.

Templarii tenent in eadem feodum unius militis cum duabus hydibus [1] in Denton' et cum una hyda in Watele de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Yvetele. Warinus filius Gerraldi tenet in eadem feodum unius militis in capite de rege.

Hedindon'. Philippa comitissa de Warwik' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis in capite de rege.

Elsefeld'. Johannes de Elsefeld' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de Willelmo de Strafford', et Willelmus de heredibus Henrici Doyly, et heredes de rege in capite.

Wodeperi. Rogerus de Aumar' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de honore de Sancto Wallerico de Beckeley.

Piddinton'. Godefridus de Crowecumb' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis in capite de rege.

Pirie et Ledhalle. Ricardus de Bello Fago et Willelmus filius Willelmi filii Elye tenent in eisdem duo feoda militum de Reginaldo filio Herberti, et ipse de heredibus Henrici Doyly, et ipsi de rege in capite.

Sthumel'. Robertus de Sthumel' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de Willelmo de Scalebroc, et idem Willelmus de constabulario Cestrie, et ipse constabularius de rege de honore Pontis Frigidi.

Foresthuir. Priorissa de Litlemor' et prior de Chaukumb' tenent in eadem terciam partem feodi unius militis de honore de Beckeley.

Wateley. Matheus de Wateley tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de abbate de Abbendon', et ipse de rege, scilicet de warda de Windeles'.

Willelmus Gernun tenet in eadem sextam partem feodi unius militis de abbate de Abbendon' de eadem warda.

Chelewrth' et Cumbes. Alexander de Cumbes tenet in eisdem feodum unius militis de feodo Roberti Musard, et idem Robertus de rege in capite.

Rogerus Gernun tenet in eisdem feodum unius militis de Radulfo Haring, et idem Radulfus de Comite Ricardo de honore de Bekeley.

Aldeberi. Petrus Folioth tenet in eadem [2] dimidium feodum militis de Sansone Folioth, et idem Sanson de comite Insule, et comes de rege.


[1] Read hydis.
[2] Tenet in eadem repeated.

OXFORD. 827

S.ij.23.I.459-473 - cont.

Tetindon'. Roisa de la Rokele tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de Petro filio Herberti, et idem Petrus de rege in capite.

Gersindon'. Walterus Pain tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de feodo abbatis de Abbendon'.

Reginaldus de Hauvill' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de eodem abbate.

Horsepathe Maior. Templarii tenent in eadem dimidium feodum militis de heredibus Roberti Musard, et ipsi de rege.

Baudindon'. Willelmus de Baudindon' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de episcopo Lincolniensi, et idem episcopus de rege in capite.

Baudindon' Sancti Laurencii. Robertus de Scrapes, Mabilia Bacun. Rogerus filius Militis, hospital' Sancti Johannis Oxonie tenent in eadem feodum unius militis de Thurstano Dispensatore, et idem Thurstanus de rege in capite.

Johannes de Moretoyn tenet in eadem quartam partem feodi unius militis de Roberto Brugefeld', et idem Robertus de com' de Warwik', et com' de rege.

Grave. Gilibertus de Baumbur' tenet in eadem quartam partem feodi unius militis de feodo com' de Warwik', et com' de rege.

HUNDREDUM DE CHADELINTON'.

Cestreton'. Bardulfus de Cestreton' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de feodo Doyly.

Johannes de Grangia tenet in eadem xam partem feodi unius militis de feodo Doyly.

Esterleg' et Kudinton' Superior. Radulfus de Salseto tenet feodum unius militis in eisdem de feodo Musard.

Spelesbur'. Willelmus de Bello Campo tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo episcopi Wygorniensis.

Parva Munstre. Johannes de Canthelup' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de feodo com' Warwik'.

Magna Rollendr'. Thurstanus Dispensator tenet in eadem ix. partes feodi unius militis de Radulfo de Mortuo Mari, et idem Radulfus de rege in capite.

Johannes de Parles tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de feodo de Stafford'.

Hogenarton est caput de baronia Doyly.

Simon de Herovile tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de feodo Doyly.

Savaricus de Walecot' tenet sextain partem feodi militis de feodo Doyly.

Cornwell'. Archiepiscopus Eboracensis tenet in eadem sextam partem feodi unius militis de feodo Doyly.

Linham. Reginaldus Forestarius tenet in eadem quartam partem unius feodi unius militis de honore Pontis Frigidi.

Johannes Medicus tenet in eadem quartam partem feodi unius militis de honore Pontis Frigidi.

Escot'. Rogerus Doyly tenet in eadem duo feoda militum de Willelmo Cantilup' de feodo Doyly.

828 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.459-473 - cont.

Fifhide. Willelmus Canet tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de feodo comitis Ferar'.

Idebur'. Brianus de Bampton' [1] tenet in eadem feodum unius militis et dimidium de Radulfo de Mortuo Mari, et ipse de rege.

Dene et Chauford'. Robertus Maudut tenet in eisdem duas partes feodi unius militis de feodo comitis Ferar'.

Pudelicot' et Cerceden'. Ricardus de Aundevil' et Rogerus Gulafre tenent in eisdem duo feoda militum de Margeria de Ripariis de feodo comitis Insule.

Kaingeham. Willelmus de Maundevill' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de comite de Hereford'.

Cercell'. Nicholaus de Nodariis tenet in eadem duo feoda militum de feodo comitis Ferar'.

Fulebrok'. Comes Ricardus tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de honore de Sancto Wallerico.

Walekot' et Sorthampton'. Savaricus de Walecot' tenet in eisdem dimidium feodum militis de comite Glovernie.

Swinbrok. Galfridus de Cruce tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de comite Glovernie.

Johannes Belet tenet in eadem terciam partem feodi unius militis de comite Glovernie.

Samford' et Cornwell'. Radulfus de Salseto tenet in eisdem dimidium feodum militis de Waltero de Lacy.

Hetrop. Hugo de Sancto Philiberto tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de feodo Musard.

Swereford'. Reginaldus filius Petri tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo Doyly.

Chadelinton'. Rogerus de Welton' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de J. de Nevile, et ipse de rege.

HUNDRED' DE CILTRE.

Chenhore et Sidam. Rogerus de Quency tenet in eisdem feodum unius militis in capite de rege.

Willhalle. Gaufridus Foliot tenet in eadem dimidium feodum unius militis de Sansone Foliot, et idem Sanson de comite de Insula.

Tuphrop medietas. Gilbertus Waze tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de Willelmo de Scalebroc de feodo de Ponte Frigido.

Alia medietas de Tuphrop. Robertus de la Rose tenet in eadem dimidium feodum unius militis de feodo Roberti Assek.

Aminton'. Nicholaus de Moles tenet in eadem feodum unius militis in warda de rege.

Denesden. Episcopus Saresberiensis tenet in eadem dimidium feodum unius militis in capite de rege.

Buleheze [2]. Reginaldus de Albo Monasterio tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de Matheo de Culuber', et idem Matheus de comite Marescallo.


[1] Read Brampton.
[2] Read Bulehethe. This scribe uses a z or Z for a p.

OXFORD. 829

S.ij.23.I.459-473 - cont.

Lechebroc. Petrus filius Ogeri et Willelmus de Engglefeld' tenent duo feoda militum de comitissa Oxonie, et ipsa de comite Marescallo.

Siplak. Willelmus de Englefeld' tenet duo feoda et dimidium militis de comite Marescallo in capite.

Bixe. Willelmus de Rale et Alexander de Swereford' tenent feodum unius militis de comitissa Oxonie, et ipsa de comite Marescallo in warda.

Rerefeld'. Archiepiscopus Eboracensis tenet feodum unius militis de comite Insule, et idem comes de rege in capite.

Bageregge. Archiepiscopus Eboracensis tenet feodum unius militis in eadem de feodo comitis Ferar', et idem comes de rege in capite.

Pirinton'. Thomas Grayly tenet quatuor feoda militum et dimidium in capite de rege de constablaria de Cestr'.

Sireburn'. Comea Ricardus tenet duo feoda militum in eadem in capite de rege de baronia de Sancto Wallerico.

Sireburn' medietas. Robertus de Burefeld' tenet duo feoda militum in eadem de feodo com' Warwik', et idem [1] com' de rege in capite.

Weston' et medietas de Witefeld'. Wido filius Roberti tenet feodum unius militis in eisdem de feodo comitis Arundell', et idem comes de rege.

Stoke. Comes Ricardus tenet in eadem duo feoda militum de feodo de Sancto Wallerico.

Berewik'. Hugo de Berewik' tenet in eadem quintam partem unius feodi de feodo archiepiscopi Cantuariensis.

Ropesford'. Helias de Witefeld' tenet in eadem duas partes dimidii feodi unius militis de baronia de feodo Doyly,

Bristewell'. Episcopus Cicestrensia tenet pro [2] terciam partem feodi unius militis de Willelmo de Scalebroc de honore Pontis Frigidi.

Rucot'. Gilibertus de Stamford' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo comitis Marescalli de comitissa Oxonie.

Lewelme. Willelmus Wace tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de comitissa Oxonie, et ipsa de rege in capite.

Euwelme. Thurstanus Dispensator tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de comitissa Oxonie, et ipsa de comite Marescallo.

Idem Thurstanus tenet in eadem xam partem feodi unius militis de honore de Notingham.

Henricus filius Roberti tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de Galfrido de Armenters, et ipse de Giliberto de Gauns.

Bensinton'. Johannes de Munsorel tenet in eadem dimidium feodum unius militis de Willelmo Sifrewast; Willelmus de rege in capite.

Lewellme. Robertus Haltested' tenet in eadem terciam partem unius feodi de feodo Galfridi de Armenters, et idem Galfridus de Gillberto de Gauns.

Chakedon'. Galfridus Marmiun tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo de Tamewrth, unde Willelmus de Cantilupo habet wardam.


[1] So in MS.
[2] Delete pro.

830 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.459-473 - cont.

Jordanus de Bideford' tenet quintam partem feodi unius militis de feodo de Thamewrth.

Crowemers. Comitissa Oxonie tenet feodum unius militis de comite Marescallo. et idem comes de rege in capite.

Mungewell'. Bartholomeus de Badenemer tenet feodum unius militis de Margeria de Ripariis, et ipsa de rege in capite.

Werpelgrave. Templarii tenent dimidium feodum unius militis in eadem de Willelmo de Scalelebroc de honore Pontis Frigidi.

Hasele. Oliverus de Hasele tenet in eadem dimidium feodum unius militis et xam partem unius feodi de Willelmo de Scalebroc de honore Pontis Frigidi.

Hasele. Robertus Blundus tenet in eadem quartam partem feodi unius militis de Willelmo de Scalebroc de honore Pontis Frigidi.

[Eleven slits for tags for the seals of the jurors.]

S.ij.23.I.481-484.

Isti sunt tenentes per seriantiam in comitatu Oxonie de domino rege in capite.

HUNDREDUM DE WOTTON'.

Willelmus filius Roberti de Nertherhorton' tenet unam hidam terre et dimidiam in eadem villa per seriantiam ad ferendum vexillum in host' regis per xla dies ad custum suum proprium.

Nicholaus de Moles tenet totam villam de Overhorton' per seriantiam ad custodiendum falcones regis.

Willelmus Buffin tenet quartam partem feodi unius militis in Nethercot' per seriantiam ad habendum perpunctum et capellum ferreum in host' regis per xla dies ad custum suum proprium.

Henricus de la Waude tenet ij. hidas terre in Stantton' per seriantiam ad custodiendum falcones regis.

Paulinas de Bampton' tenet unam carucatum terre et tres virgatas terre de dono Gunnore de la Mare in Eston' que pertinent ad feodum ipsius Gunnore in Elfescot' per seriantiam ad inveniendum hostiarium ad hostium thalami regis.

Galfridus de Torp tenet duas hidas terre in Ludewell' per seriantiam ad serviendum in dispensatoria regis sub Galfrido Dispensatore.

Robertus de Broc tenet duas hidas terre in Tywe' de feodo comitis Lincolnie per servicium husar' abek et calcarium deauratorum.

HUNDREDUM DE BAMPTON'.

Beatrix Murdac tenet totam villam de Brochton' per seriantiam ad portandum et ad mutandum unum hostorium regis.

Gunnora de la Mare tenet villam de Elvescot' per seriantiam inveniendi unum militem ad custodiendum hostium thalami regis.

Robertus de Eleford' tenet quatuor virgatas terre in Eleford' per seriantiam ad mutandum unum falconem per annum.

Idem Robertus tenet in Eston' tres virgatas terre per seriantiam ad habendum perpunctum et capellum ferreum et lanceam in servicio domini regis per xla dies ad custum suum proprium.


[1] In Tywe interlined.

OXFORD. 831

S.ij.23.I.481-484 - cont.

IN HUNDREDO DE BLOKESHAM nullus tenens per seriantiam.

HUNDREDUM DE CHADELINTON'.

Thurstanus Dispensator tenet in Magna Rolendr' v. hidas terre per seriantiam de dispensatoria regis.

Isti sunt tenentes de elemosinis in comitatu Oxonie.

HUNDREDUM DE POKEDOLOE.

Weston'. Abbas de Osen' tenet in eadem duo feoda militum de feodo com' Warwik' in liberam elemosinam.

Cottesford'. Abbas de Becko tenet totam villam in liberam elemosinam de dono Aline Iverui.

Cherleton'. Abbas de Sancto Ebroldo tenet dimidiam villam de Cherleton' de dono Roberti quondam comitis de Leycestr' in liberam elemosinam.

Solphorn. [1] Lucia de Ardem' tenet totam villatam eandem in liberum maritagium; non potest inquiri pro quanto feodo, nec aliquid debet scutagium ut dicunt.

Ichteslep. Abbas de Westmonasterio tenet totam villam de dono Sancti Edwardi.

HUNDREDUM DE WOTTON.

Dunthrop. Abbas de Bruera tenet in eadem sex hidas terre in liberam elemosinam de priore de Noyone.

Seuewell'. Abbas de Radinges tenet in eadem xj. virgatas terre in liberam elemosinam.

Newenton'. Hospitalarii Sancti Johannis Oxonie tenent in eadem unam hidam et dimidiam in elemosinam ad reddendum per annum ad garderobam regis unas forcias [2] die natali Domini.

Hensinton'. Abbas de Osen' tenet in eadem dimidiam hidam terre in elemosinam, nec dat scutagium.

Eynesham. Abbas de Eynesham tenet totam villam in elemosinam de episcopatu Lincolnie.

Ludewell'. Prior de Kenilwrth tenet in eadem sex virgatas terre de feodo Arsik in liberam elemosinam.

Godestowe. Abbatissa de Godestowe tenet totam villam in liberam elemosinam de dono Regis Henrici.

Worton'. Abbas de Osen' tenet in eadem duas hidas terre et dimidiam in liberam elemosinam de prebenda Sancti Georgii.

HUNDREDUM DE CHADELINTON'.

Enneston'. Abbas de Winchecumb' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis in liberam elemosinam de feodo comitis Glovernie, et pertinet ad perficiendum duo feoda que idem abbas tenet in Winchecumb' in comitatu Glovernie.

Cestreton'. Abbas de Eynesham tenet in eadem quaiuor hidas terre in liberam elemosinam de feodo Doyly.


[1] Read Solphorn.
[2] Read fortices.

832 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.481-484 - cont.

Teinton' et Mor'. Prior de Derherat tenet utramque villam in liberam elemosinam, nescitur pro quanto feodo.

Parva Rolandr'. Abbas de Eynsham tenet in eadem quinque hidas terre in liberam elemosinam.

HUNDREDUM DE BLOKESHAM.

Parva Bereford'. Thomas de Warplinton' et Petrus le Butiler tenent in eadem x. libratas terre; nescitur pro quanto feodo nec de cuius dono.

Mildecumbe. Abbas de Eynsham, prior de Noione, et prior de Merton' tenent totam villam in liberam elemosinam de feodo Doyly; nesscitur pro quanto feodo.

Tidemerton'. Abbas de Abbendon' tenet totam vlllam in liberam elemosinam; nessitur de cuius dono.

Parva Sibeford'. Templarii tenent in eadem unum feodum militis; nescitur quo Warento, et non reddunt scutagium.

Hornele. Archidiaconus de Bukinkeham tenet medietatem eiusdem ville in liberam elemosinam de feodo episcopi Lincolniensis.

HUNDREDUM DE BAMPTON'.

Bampton'. Archidiaconus Exonie tenet terciam partem eiusdem ville in liberam elemosinam; nescitur de dono cuius regis nec quo waranto.

Sibford'. Abbas de Eynsham tenet totam villam in liberam elemosinam de feodo episcopi Lincolniensis.

Herdwik'. Prior de Seis tenet in eadem x. libratas terre in liberam elemosinam in capite de rege.

HUNDREDUM DE BOLENDEN.

Elsefeld'. Prior Sancte Fripeswide Exonie tenet in eadem unam hidam terre in liberam elemosinam de feodo Doyly.

HUNDRED' DE CILTR'.

Episcopus Lincolniensis tenet hundredum de Banneber' et hundredum de Tham' et hundredum de Dorkecestr' in capite de rege, in quibus non permittit facere inquisicionem de feodis.

Idem de honore de Walingeford'.

Isti tulerunt brevia de habendo scutagio in comitatu Oxonie.

Gerardus de Oddingeseles. R. de Quency, comes Wyntonie, Warinus filius Gerardi. Nicholaus de Molis. Galfridus Dispensarius. R. episcopus Lincolniensis. Abbas de Westmonasterio. R. comes Pictavie et Cornubie. Com' Warwik'.

OXFORD. 833

S.ij.23.I.481-484.

Gilibertus de Gaunt. Thomas de Greyly. Willelmus de Cantilupo. Baudewinus de Rivers, comes Insule. Item Galfridus Dispensarius de feodis [1] habet in warda. R. episcopus Saresberiensis. W. Marescallus, comes Pembrokie. Rogerus de Sumery. Simon de Montiforti, comes Leycestrie. Hugo de Albiniaco, comes Arundell'. Willelmus de Sifrewast. Patricius de Chawrch'. Johannes de Nevill'. Ricardus de Harecurt de respectu in octabas Sancti Hylarii. Humfridus de Boun, comes Essexie. Philippus Basset de respectu in octabas clausi Pasehe. Willelmus Longespey. Radulfus de Sancto Amando. Willelmus de Moun de respectu de dimidio feodo usque in octabas Sancti Hylarii.

In libro.

S.ij.23.I.446-459.

COMITATUS OXONIE.

Feoda Comitis Marescalli, Breve.

Johannes de Hulecot' tenet in Bodicot' feodum unius militis de comite Marescallo, et idem comes de rege in capite.

Episcopus Norwicensis tenet in Stok' feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Robertus de Eyvile tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Reginaldus de Albo Monasterio tenet in Bulehuthe feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Petrus filius Oggeri et Willelmus de Englefeld tenent in Lechebrok' duo feoda militum de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Willelmus de Englefeld' tenet in Siplak' feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Willelmus de Roleg' [2] et Alexander de Swereford tenent in Bixe feodum unius militis de comitissa Oxonie de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Gilebertus de Stanford tenet in Rucot' feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis de comitissa Oxonie.

Thurstanus Dispensator tenet in Ewelme dimidium feodum militis de comitissa Oxonie de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Comitissa Oxonie tenet in Craumerse feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.


[1] Supply que.
[2] Rale in the inquisition.

834 A.D. 1242-1243.

Feoda Comitis Insule. Breve.

S.ij.23.I.446-459 - cont.

Angnes de Meydewell' tenet in Newenton' feodum unius militis de feodo comitis Insule.

Alanus de Rumely tenet in Stepeleston' feodum unius militis de Rogero de Leyburn' de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Eva de Gray tenet in Demeford feodum unias militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Abbas de Osen' tenet in Burton' dimidium feodum militis de feodo eiusdem comitis de Eva de Gray.

Eva de Gray tenet in Stanlak' feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Sampson Foliot tenet in Ake dimidium feodum militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Rogerus Foliot tenet in Fretewell' feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Laurencius del Brok' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Petrus Foliot tenet in Aldebur' dimidium feodum militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Archiepiscopus Eboracensis tenet in Rutherefeld feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Galfridus Foliot tenet in Wylhale dimidium feodum militis de Sampsone Foliot de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Feoda Margerie de Ripariis, Comitisse Insule. In rotulo.

Bartholomeus de Badelesmere tenet in Mungewell' feodum unius militis de Margeria de Ripariis, comitissa Insule, et ipsa de rege in capite.

Ricardus de Andevile et Rogerus Gulafre tenent in Pudelicot' et in Cerceden' de eadem feoda duorum militum.

Radulfus Ivaus tenet in Newenton' feodum unius militis de eadem.

Abbas de Osen' tenet in Parva Tywe feodum unius militis de eadem.

Eadem Margeria tenet Newenham pro uno feodo militis.

Feoda Comitis Wyntonie. Breve.

Johannes de Peauton' tenet in Sipton' dimidium feodum militis de Wydone filio Roberti de feodo comitis Wyntonie.

Simon Vitor et abbas de Osen' tenent feodum unius militis in Sibbeford de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Warinus de Vernun tenet dimidium feodum militis in Haneweye de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Idem comes tenet in Sennore et in Sidenham feodum unius militis in capite de rege.

Feoda Comitis Saresberie. Breve.

Robertus de Eston' tenet feodum unius militis in Norteston' de feodo comitis Saresberie, et idem comes de rege in capite.

OXFORD. 835

S.ij.23.I.446-459 - cont.

W. Longespe tenet quartam partem feodi unius militis in Mudelinton' in capite de rege.

Rogerus de Wytcestr' tenet quartam partem feodi unius militis in Godindun' de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Feodum Nicholai de Molis. Breve.

Idem Nicholaus tenet in Aminton' feodum unius militis in warda de rege.

Feodum Episcopi Saresberiensis. Reapondet per se.

Idem episcopus tenet dimidium feodum militis in Duneaden in capite de rege.

Feodum Patricii de Chawrces. Breve.

Eva de Gray et Beatrix Murdak tenent in Burton' dimidium feodum militis de Patricio de Chawrces,

Feoda Arsik.

Coges est caput de baronia.

Radulfus Ivaus tenet in Newenton' feodem unius militis de feodo Arsik'.

Ricardus Kute tenet in Berton' Ede feodum unius militis de eodem feodo, et in Dunestywe.

Willelmus de Paris tenet in Kersinton' feodum unius militis de eodem feodo.

Prior de Wroxstan', Willelmus Leuk' et Robertus de Cerceden' et magister Simon de Walton' tenent in Baliscot' feodum unius militis de eodem feodo.

Radulfus filius Nicholai tenet in Fretewell' quartam partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Robertus de la Rose tenet in Twytrop dimidium feodum militis in eodem feodo.

Feodum Galfridi Dispensatoris. Breve.

Rogerus de Sancto Johanne tenet in Berton' et in Stanton' feodum unius militis.

Feoda Musard unde G. Dispensator habet wardam. Breve.

Alexander de Cumbes tenet in Chelewrth' et in Cumbes feodum unius militis de feodo Roberti Musard.

Templarii de Cofle tenent in Horspeth' dimidium feodum militis de eodem feodo.

Radulfus de Salseto tenet in Esterleg' et in Superiori Kudinton' feodum unius militis de eodem feodo.

Hugo de Sancto Phileberto tenet in Hetrop dimidium feodum militis de eodem feodo.

836 A.D. 1242-1243.

Feoda Comitis Arundell'. Breve.

S.ij.23.I.446-459 - cont.

Radulfus de Preaus tenet in Mangna Tywe quartam partem feodi unius militis de feodo comitis Arundell'.

Thomas Mansel et Alexander Dovyle tenent in Tackele feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Wydo filius Roberti et Stephanus Simeon et Thomas de la Haye tenent in Norbrok' et in Ardulvele feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Wydo filius Roberti tenet in Weaton' et in Wytefeld' feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Rogerus de Sumery tenet in Tywe c. solldatas terre de dono comitis Arundell'; non potest inquiri pro quanto feodo.

Feoda Comitis Glovernie. In rotulo.

Robertus de Chandos, Willelmus de Bosco, et David de Buvedun' tenent in Finemere feodum unius militis de feodo comitis Glovernie.

Johannes filius Ricardi filii Nigelli tenet in Newenton' dimidium feodum militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Alicia de Bendenges tenet in Saldewell' dimidium feodum militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Roysia de Verdon' tenet in Heth' dimidium feodum militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Leticia [1] que fuit uxor Ricardi de Hanred tend in Heyford feodum unius militis de eodem feodo.

Savaricus de Walecot' tenet in Walecot' et in Sorthamton' dimidium feodum militis de eodem.

Galfridus de Cruce tenet in Swynbrok' dimidium feodum militis de eodem.

Johannes Belet tenet in eadem terciam partem feodi unius militis de eodem.

Abbas de Osen' tenet in Hamton' Gay dimidium feodum militis de eodem.

Feodum Abbatis de Westmonasterio. Respondet per se.

Johannes le Poure tenet dimidium feodum militis de eodem abbate in Otindon'.

Ada de Gay tenet in Nortbrok' quartam partem feodi unius militis de eodem abbate.

Feodum Warini filii Geroldi. Breve.

Idem Warinus tenet in Iveteleg' feodum unius militis in capite de rege.

Feoda Thome Grely. Breve.

Thomas Greyley tenet in Periton' quatuor feoda militum et dimidium in capite de rege.


[1] Lucia in the inquisition, p. 825.

OXFORD. 837

S.ij.23.I.446-459 - cont.

Feoda Doyly. In rotulo.

Hogenarton' est caput de baronia de Oyly.

Simon de Herovile tenet in eadem dimidium feodum unius militis de eodem feodo.

Savaricus de Walecot' tenet in eadem sextam partem feodi unius militis de eodem.

Archiepiscopus Eboracensis tenet in Cornwell' sextam partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Bardullus de Cesterton' tenet in Cesterton' dimidium feodum militis de eodem feodo.

Johannes de Grangia tenet in eadem xam partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Willelmus de Dyve tenet in Dukelindon' et in Kurtlinton' et in Parva Bereford duo feoda militum de eodem.

Wydo filius Roberti tenet in Wigenton' dimidium feodum militis de feodo Doyly.

Thomas Goher tenet in Sibbeford feodum unius militis de eodem feodo. Warwik'. In rotulo.

Mauricius de Andely tenet in Thuresmere dimidium feodum militis de eodem feodo.

Abbas de Osen' tenet in Fulewell' feodum unius militis de eodem feodo.

Rogerus de Aumery tenet in Blichesdon' et in Buckehull' duo feoda militum de eodem feodo.

Willelmus de Andely tenet in Herdewyk' feodum unius militis de eodem feodo.

Petrus de Dunington' tenet in Kurtlinton' quartam partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Ricardus de Bello Fago tenet in Pery et Ledhale et Willelmus filius Willelmi duo feoda militum de Reginaldo filio Hereberti de feodo Doyly.

Johannes de Mortoin' tenet in Baudindon' quartam partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Gilebertus de Banbur' tenet in Grava quartam partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Robertus de Buregefeld tenet in Sireburn' duo feoda militum de com' Warewyk' de eodem. Warwik. In rotulo.

Elyas de Wytefeld tenet in Ropesford duas partes dimidii feodi militis de eodem.

Johannes de Cantulupo tenet in Parva Menistre dimidium feodum militis de eodem. Warwik. In rotulo.

Feoda de Oyly que Willelmus de Canth' tenet de dote uxoris sue. Breve.

Rogerus Doyly tenet in Bampton' et Kenicot' duo feoda militum de feodo de Oyly.

Idem Rogerus tenet in Estcot' duo feoda militum de eodem.

Reginaldus filius Petri tenet in Swereford feodum unius militi de eodem.

838 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.446-459 - cont.

Hugo de Tywe tenet in Tywe et in Edburbur' et in Swereford feodum unius militis de eodem.

Willelmus de Canth' tenet Kudelinton' de eodem feodo et servicium Willelmi Langhals qui tenet tres virgatas terre de eodem feodo.

Johannes de Elsefeld tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de eodem feodo.

Feoda Gileberti de Gant. Breve.

Henricus filius Roberti tenet in Ewelm' feodum unius militis de feodo Gileberti de Gant.

Robertus de Halenstud tenet in eadem terciam partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Feodum Willelmi Sifrewast. Breve.

Johannes de Montsorel tenet de eodem in Ewelm' dimidium feodum militis.

Feoda de Honore Pontis Frigidi. In rotulo.

Oliverus de Haseleg' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis et xam partem unius feodi de Willelmo Scalebrok' de honore Pontis Frigidi.

Robertus Blundus tenet in eadem quartam partem unius feodi de eodem feodo.

Templarii de Cofle tenent in Werplesgrave dimidium feodum de eodem feodo.

Episcopus Cycestrensis tenet in Briettewell' terciam partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Simon Scorchebuf tenet in Sipton' dimidium feodum militis de eodem feodo.

Willelmus de Paris tenet in Kersinton' quartam partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Willelmus filius Petri tenet in Kersinton' tres partes feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Robertus de Thumel' tenet in Thumel' feodum unius militis de eodem feodo.

Johannes Medicus et Reginaldus Forestarius tenent in Linham dimidium feodum unius militis de eodem.

Gilebertus Wase tenet dimidium feodum militis de eodem feodo.

Feoda Radulfi de Sancto Amando. Breve.

Idem Radulfus tenet in Bloxham feodum unius militis in capite de rege.

Idem Radulfus tenet in Edberbur' dimidium feodum militis in capite de rege.

Matheus de Coudray tenet in Alkrinton' feodum unius militis de Radulfo de Sancto Amando.

Feoda Willelmi de Kaynes. In rotulo.

Abbas de Bruera tenet in Dunthrop feodum unius militis de feodo Willelmi de Kaynes.

OXFORD. 839

S.ij.23.I.446-459 - cont.

Hugo Paynel tenet in Westcot' Berton' feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem Willelmi.

Feoda Abbatis de Abindon'. In rotulo.

Radulfus de Sanford tenet in Sanford feodum unius militis de feodo abbatis de Abindon', et idem abbas de rege.

Templarii de Cofle tenent in eadem cum duabus hydis terre in Denton' feodum unius militis de eodem abbate.

Matheus de Wateleg' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de eodem abbate de warda de Wyndeshor'.

Willelmus Gernun tenet in Watel' sextam partem feodi unius militis de eodem abbate et de eadem warda.

Walterus Payn tenet in Gersindon' dimidium feodum militis de eodem abbate.

Reginaldus de Auvile tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de eodem abbate.

Feoda Comitis Ferar'. In rotulo.

Willelmus Canet tenet in Fifhyd' dimidium feodum militis de feodo comitis Fer'.

Robertus Maudut tenet in Den' et in Challord duas partes feodi unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Nicholaus de Nodariis tenet in Cercell' duo feoda militum de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Archiepiscopus Eboracensis tenet in Bagerug' dimidium feodum militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Feoda Radulfi de Mortuo Mari. In rotulo.

Turstanus Dispensator tenet in Mangna Rollendr' ix. partes feodi unius militis de feodo Radulfi de Mortuo Mari.

Brianus de Brampton' tenet in Idebur' feodum unius militis et dimidii de eodem feodo.

Feoda Episcopi Wygorniensis. Respondet in Wigornia.

Willelmus de Bello Campo tenet in Spellesbur' feodum unius militis de feodo episcopi Wygorniensis.

Feoda Comitis Herefordie et Essexie. Breve.

Willelmus de Mandevill' tenet in Kaingham feodum unius militis de feodo comitis Herefordie.

Hamon de Sancta Fide tenet in Wendlebur' feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Willelmus filius Amaurici tenet in Wendlebur' feodum unius militis de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Feoda Episcopi Lincolniensis. Respondet in Lincoln.

Idem episcopus tenet hundredum de Tham' et hundredum de Dorkecestr' et hundredum de Bannebur' in capite de rege nec permittit vicecomitem intrare ad inquisicionem faciendam de feodis.

840 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.446-459 - cont.

Willelmus de Baudindon' tenet feodum unius militis in Baldindon' de feodo eiusdem episcopi.

Feoda W. de Lacy. In rotulo.

Radulfus de Salseto tenet in Sauford et in Cornwell' dimidium feodum militis de feodo W. de Lacy.

Robertus de Pirneho tenet dimidium feodum militis in Bereford Olof de feodo de Lacy. [1]

Leticia de Sausey tenet in Nethercudinton' dimidium feodum militis de eodem feodo.

Feoda de Stutevill'. In rotulo.

Eadem Leticia tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de feodo Willelmi de Stutevll'.

Feoda de Lacy. In rotulo.

Priorissa de Stodleg' et Matillis de Leuns tenent in Bekkebrok feodum unius militis de feodo de Lacy.

Feoda de Stafford. In rotulo.

Johannes de Paries tenet in Mangna Rollendr' dimidium feodum militis de feodo de Stafford.

Hugo de Tywe tenet in Tywe unum feodum militis de feodo de Stafford et in Edburbur'.

Ada de Brimpton' tenet in Middeleston' dimidium feodum militis de eodem.

Feoda de Mortoyn. In rotulo.

Johannes de Broucton' tenet in Brocton' et in Newenton' tria feoda de Mortein de parvis feodis.

Ricardus de Prestecot' tenet in Blechesdon' et in Wicthull' dimidium feodum militis de eodem feodo.

Feoda que tenentur in capite de rege.

Baldewinus de Ver tenet in Tywe xxam partem feodi unius militis in capite de rege. In rotulo.

Basilia de Bereford tenet in Ielebur' unam carucatam terre de feodo Hervici Bagot; nesscitur pro quanto feodo. Stafford. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Dyves et Radulfus Harang tenent in Dadinton' duo feoda militum in capite de rege. De rege. In rotulo.

Johannes filius Henrici tenet in Netherorton' dimidium feodum militis de feodo Fulk' Basset, et ipse de rege in capite. Fulco Basset. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Mohun tenet in Glimton' feodum unius militis de feodo Willelmi de Bruera, et idem de rege in capite. Heredes de Breose. In rotulo.


[1] Cf. p. 821 above, where the overlord is called John de Lacy, probably in error.

OXFORD. 841

S.ij.23.I.446-459 - cont.

Ricardus de Harecurt tenet in Stanton' feodum unius militis in capite de rege. Rex. In rotulo.

Gerardus de Oddingeseles et Gerardus de Lindesy (in rotulo quia non habet breve) tenent duo feoda militum in Bradewell' in capite de rege. Feoda Gerardi Dodingeseles. Breve.

Willelmus de Hasting' tenet feodum unius militis et dimidii in Westwell', Eleford et in Alewaldebur' in capite de rege. Willelmus de Hasting'. In rotulo.

Simon de Averenches tenet in Redcot' quartam partem feodi unius militis in capite de rege. Rex. In rotulo.

Henricus de Lingiure tenet in Edburbur' feodum unius militis in capite de rege. Rex. In rotulo.

Abbas de Cirencestr' tenet in Edburbur' dimidium feodum militis in capite de rege. Rex. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Hamton' tenet dimidium feodum militis in Hampton' in capite de rege. Rex. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Blakevill' tenet in Sexinton' octavam partem feodi unius militis de Thoma Buffin qui tenet in capite de rege. Rex. In rotulo.

Fulk' Basset tenet in Kurtlinton' et in Bigenhull' et in Horton' quartam partem feodi unius militis in capite de rege. Rex. In rotulo.

Philippa comitissa de Warewik' tenet in Hedindon' feodum unius militis in capite de rege. Rex. In rotulo.

Godefridus de Craucumb' tenet in Pydinton' feodum unius militis in capite de rege. Rex. In rotulo.

Item.

Feoda que W. de Cantilupo habet in warda. Breve.

Galfridus Marmiun tenet in Chakenden' feodum unius militis de feodo de Thamewrth.

Jordanus de Bydeford tenet in eadem quintam partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Feoda Comitisse Oxonie. In rotulo.

Willelmus Wase tenet in Ewelm' feodum unius militis de comitissa Oxonie, et ipsa de rege.

De Honore de Notingham Peverel. In rotulo.

Thurstanus Dispensator tenet in Ewelm' xam partem feodi unius militis de honore de Notingham.

Feodum Archiepiscopi Cantuariensis. Custodes respondent.

Hugo de Berewyk' tenet in eadem quintam partem feodi unius militis de feodo archiepiscopi Cantuariensis.

Feoda Wychard Ledet. In rotulo.

Prior de Wroxstan' tenet in Wroxetan' feodum unius militis de feodo Wychard Ledet.

842 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.446-459 - cont.

Item.

Johannes de Lexinton' tenet in Hornele et in Hornington' dimidium feodum militis de dono Roberti de Lexinton' de honore de Brandune. In rotulo.

De Honore Peverel. In rotulo.

Radulfus de Cesterton' tenet in Molinton' feodum unius militis de honore Peverel in capite de rege.

De Honore de Benefeld.

Thomas le Barbur et Walterus de Olneye tenent in Lillingstan' quartam partem feodi unius militis. Rex. In rotulo.

Feoda Johannis de Nevilla. Breve.

Rogerus de Welton' tenet in Chad' feodum unius militis de feodo Johannis de Nevill'.

Feoda Roberti de Escrups.

Idem Robertus et Mabilia Bacun et hospitalarii Sancti Johannis Oxonie j. feodum in Baudindon' de Turstano Dispensatore, et idem Turstanus de rege in capite.

[Endorsed:-] In libra.

Continet xxv. pecias cum transcripto.

BERKS.

S.ij.23. S.ij.30. I.551-555.

FEODA MILITUM IN COMITATU BERKES.

Radulfus Barry in Bochamton' j. feodum.

Gilebertus de Marisco in Estbir' dimidium feodum.

Henricus de Hynton' in Estbir' iij. partes feodi.

Fulco filius Warini in Lamburn dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Plugenay in Lamburn dimidium feodum.

Willelmus Gernun in Uplamburn dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Bello Campo et Willelmus de Burmingham in Maydenecote j. feodum.

Johannes de Riparia et Willelmus le Breton in Bracgrave quartam partem j. feodi.

Egidius de Erley et alii in Migham j. feodum.

Thomas de Kenete in Wahesinge dimidium feodum.

Adam de Brimton' in Brimtona j. feodum.

Willelmus de Brittinoles in Colethrop' j; feodum.

Philippus de Columbariis in Sawe j. feodum.

Prior de Pogheleg' in Bagenore cum membris j. feodum.

Idem prior in Cuserug' j. feodum.

Ricardus de Pesemer' et Nicholaus de Hedinton' in Pesemer' ij. feoda.

BERKS. 843

S.ij.23. S.ij.30. I.551-555 - cont.

Walterus de Riparia in Beden' ij. feoda et dimidium.

Gilebertus de Samford' in Langel' et Bradel' j. feodum.

Willelmus de Scifrewast' in Hamsted' et alibi j. feodum.

Walterus de la Wyle in La Wyle j. feodum.

Petrus de Yetingden [1] in Yetingeden j. feodum.

Oliverus de Eynicurt in Friglesham j. feodum.

Isabella de Mortuo Mari in Lechamsted' j. feodum.

Ricardus filius Johannis in Wynterburn j. feodum.

Alanus de Farnham in Eston' et in Wynterburn j. feodum.

Stamford' Cancelar' scilicet Petrus de Stamford' in eadem villa j. feodum.

Galfridus de Wancey in Lewarton' j. feodum.

Bartholomeus de la Huse in Denford' j. feodum.

Willelmus de Britinoles in Sandon' j. feodum.

Walterus le Mansel, Nicholaus de Ingepenn' et abbas de Tychef ij. feoda in Ingepepenn'.

Ricardus Longespey in Avinton' j. feodum.

Philippus de Cumbrewell' in Godingeflod' dimidium feodum.

Johannes Belet in Ingeflod' Belet quintam partem j. feodi.

Randulfus Fretoxe in Shaldeburn dimidium feodum.

Prior de Sandelford' et Nicholaus de Aufrica in Enebum dimidium feodum.

Johannes Belet de Eneburn et Andreas de la Brech' in Eneburn dimidium feodum.

Robertus de la Harleter in Halebenham dimidium feodum.

Sewellus de Osevile in Wydehay et Estyldesl' ij. feoda.

Radulfus Mefelin in Benham Ricardi de Livinton' dimidium feodum.

Anketillus Malore in Suthfalel' dimidium feodum.

Willelmus filius Henrici in Estsifford' dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Elfreton' in Elfreton' quartam partem feodi.

Adam de Elfreton' in Elfreton' quartam partem feodi.

Galfridus Dispensator in Spersolt et Uplamburn de terra que [2] Rob' Musard j. f.

Johannes de Freporn in Chelrey j. feodum.

Johannes Mautravers in eadem villa j. feodum.

Willelmus de Kampain in eadem villa j. feodum.

Elias de Bagenore in Dencheswurth' et eius participes dimidium feodum.

Henricus de Tubeney in eadem villa dimidium feodum.

Radulfus de Cameys in Northdencheswurth' duas partes j. feodi.

Petrus Malherbe et Hugo de Sancto Mauro in Westhenn' dimidium feodum.

Rogerus de la Hyde in Esthanney j. feodum.

Johannes de Pavylly in Cherleton' j. feodum.

Egidius de Erley in eadem villa dimidium feodum.

Galfridus de Bono Fossato in eadem villa quartam partem feodi.


[1] The copyist at the Exchequer, mistaking a capital Y for a thorn, has written this name as Thedingden (S.ij.30).
[2] Supply fuit.

844 A.D, 1242-1243.

S.ij.23. S.ij.30. I.551-555 - cont.

Johannes de la Wyka in eadem villa quartem partem feodi.

Stephanus de Cursun in Westlaking' j. feodum.

Willelmus Gernun in Estgeyng' dimidium feodum.

Robertus de Hafford' in Hafford' ij. feoda.

Willelmus Salmon in Shalfingford' et Radulfus Sturmy in Wachene feld' j. feodum.

Willelmus de Hulecote in Berecot' quartam partem feodi.

Robertus de Hafford' in Newenton' sextam partem feodi.

Elias de Newenton' in eadem villa quartam partem feodi.

Walterus filius Willelmi in Farndon' dimidium feodum.

Hospitalarii in Boclande j. feodum.

Henricus de Pesey in Pesey j. feodum.

Willelmus de Bakepuz in Kingeston' et Esseden' et Cumpton' dimidium feodum.

Rogerus de Clifford' de terra que fuit Rogeri de Kingeston' in eadem j. feodum.

Philippus de Fifhyde in Fifhyde et Catmere j. feodum et dimidium.

Henricus de Tobbeney in Tobbeney j. feodum.

Willelmus de Merton' in Appelton' dimidium feodum.

Fulco de Codray in Lifford' j. feodum.

Robertus Hemming in Esthenney j. feodum.

Johannes de Aura in Suthcote j. feodum.

Thomas de Gimeges in Bradel' dimidium feodum.

Walterus de Gosey et alii j. feodum.

Droco de Weston' in Weston' dimidium feodum.

Johannes de Nevill' in Suthmorton' dimidium feodum.

Johannes de Plesseto in eadem villa decimam partem feodi.

Northmorton'. Johannes de Turbervil' de terra que fuit Henrici Basset j. feodum.

Philippus de Sandrevil' in Suthmorton' et Eneburn j. feodum.

Galfridus de Mandevil' in Sottewell' j. feodum.

Willelmus le Flemeng in Stretleg' tres partes feodi.

Robertus de Gygnes in Bastlesden' j. feodum.

Willelmus de Hastinges in Eton' j. feodum.

Reginaldus de Albo Monasterio in Burwardescote j. feodum.

Roolandus de Odingesel' in eadem villa j. feodum.

Ichenardus filius Stephani in Coleshull' dimidium feodum.

Galfridus Foliot in Edwyneston' dimidium feodum.

Henricus de Batonia in Essebir' dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Heris, Robertus de Knitter in Wendelesclive j. feodum.

Simon filius Hugonis in Ordeiston' j. feodum.

Willelmus de Bello Campo in Cumpton' et Ordeiston' j. feodum.

Prior de Sancta Frepeswytha in Knicteton' j. feodum.

Gilebertus de Columbariis in Hordewell' et Uffinton' j. feodum.

Warinus filius Geroldi in Fafflore j. feodum.

Idem Warinus in Kingeston' j. feodum.

Magister Reginaldus de Wulvricheston' in eadem villa dimidium feodum.

Simon de Luuek', Robertus de Auvers in Chilton' et Henricus de Pesey in Colrug' j. feodum.

BERKS. 845

S.ij.23. S.ij.30. I.551-555 - cont.

Alicia de Sanford' in Chllton' j. feodum.

Agnes de Ponte Audomari et participea eiua in Westyldesl' j. feodum.

Johannes Mansel in eadem villa dimidium feodum.

Galfridus Ridel in Hodicote j. feodum.

Johannes de Cormayles et Philippus de Berewyk' in Hodicote j. feodum.

Johannes de Elsefeld' in Estyldesl' j. feodum.

Reginaldus filius Johannis in eadem villa quartam partem feodi.

Matheus Huse in Stenden' et Bukesyate j. feodum.

Willelmus de Legh' in Legh' j. feodum.

Willelmus de Seuekewurth' in Seuekewurth', Baywurth' et Mergham ij. feoda.

Hugo filius Henrici in Abbendon', Drayton' et Samford', j. feodum.

Terra que fuit Nicholai de Sunningwell' in eadem, Garford', et alibi j. feodum et dimidium.

Thomas de Hyneton' in Suggewurth' dimidium feodum.

Philippus de Sancta Helena in Abbendon' et Frileford' iij. feoda

Rading'.

Johannes Banastre in Sylhamsted' j. feodum.

Willelmus Revel in Wullavinton' dimidium feodum.

Rogerus de Sumery in Bradefeld' j. feodum.

Robertus de Uffinton' in Uffinton' dimidium feodum.

Richerus Neymut in Uffinton' j. feodum.

Robertus de Burghefeld' in eadem villa dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Englefeld' in Englefeld' j. feodum.

Robertus de Auvers in Woghefeld' j. feodum.

Willelmus de Scifrewast' in Purl' viij. partem j. feodi.

Johannes de la Huse in Paddewurth' v. partem feodi.

Wyndeles'.

Henricus de Erley in Erley j. feodum.

Johannes de Bercham in Bercham j. feodum.

Egidius de Erley in Erley j. feodum.

Willelmus Banastre in Finghamsted' j. feodum.

Robertus de Sottebroc in Sottebroc j. feodum.

Ricardus de Scifrewast' in Cliffewar dimidium feodum.

Willelmus de Colewurth' in Elinton' dimidium feodum.

Henricus de Elinton' in eadem villa dimidium feodum.

Petrus de Monte Forti in Remeham j. feodum.

Galfridus Dispensator in Swalewefeld' dimidium feodum.

Petrus le Loreng in [1] ... quintam partem feodi.

Prior de Hurl' in Chaddehangre quartam partem feodi.

Reginaldus le Forester in Waltham quartam partem feodi.

[Endorsed:-] Berks. Scrutatur. In libro.

S.ij.23.I.486-489.

ROTULUS DE UNIVERSIS FEODIS MILITUM IN COMITATU BERKESIR'.

Egidius de Erley, Willelmus Bastard et Radulfus de Scaccario tenent in villa de Migham unum feodum de feodo Roberti de Pinkeny.


[1] Supply Diddeworth'.

846 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.486-489 - cont.

Adam de Brimton' in Brimton' unum feodum de feodo Radulfi de Mortuo Mari.

Willelmus de Brittinoles in Colethrop' j. feodum de feodo Roberti Achard'.

Philippus de Columbariis in Sawe j. feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite.

Prior de Poghel' in Bagenore, Henricus Keruet in Colemer, Paganus filius Willelmi in Samford', j. feodum de feodo comitis de Gloucestria.

Idem prior in Cuserug' j. feodum de feodo Radulfi de Mortuo Mari.

Ricardus de Pesemer in Pesemer j. feodum de feodo eiusdem Radulfi.

Nicholaus de Hedinton' in Pesemer dimidium feodum de feodo Hereberti filii Rogeri.

Walterus de Riparia in Beden' duo feoda et dimidium de feodo abbatis Abbendonie.

Thomas de Gymeges in Bradeleg' dimidium feodum de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Oliverus de Eynicurt' in Friglesham et Estyldesl' duas partes unius feodi de feodo comitis de Ferrariis.

Galfridus de Wancy et priorissa de Litellemor' in Lewarton' j. feodum de feodo abbatis Abbendonie.

Walterus Marescallus, comes Pembrochie, in Spenes j. feodum de feodo de Kinton'.

Bartholomeus de la Huse in Denford' j. feodum de eodem feodo de Kinton'.

Johannes Belet de Ingeflod' in Ingeflod' quintam partem unius feodi quam tenet de domino rege in capite.

Johannes Belet de Enebern et Andreas de la Brech' in Enebern dimidium feodum de feodo com' de Warewyk'.

Nicholaus de Aufrica et Willelmus de Clervaus in Enebern dimidium feodum de feodo Roberti de Pinkeny.

Herebertus filius Petri in Lechamsted' j. feodum de feodo abbatis Abbendonie.

Anketillus Malore in Suthfalel' de ballio domini regis dimidium feodum de terra Normannorum.

Willelmus filius Henrici de Estscifford' in Estscifford' dimidium feodum de feodo Gileberti Peche.

Ricardus de Elfreton' in Elfreton' quartem partem unius feodi de feodo com' de Warewyk'.

Johannes Mautravers in Celrey j. feodum de feodo Walteri de Saye de honore de Ludelawe.

Willelmus de Kampan in eadem villa j. feodum de feodo Ricardi de Scropes.

Elias de Bagenor' et Hervicus de Wylbricton' in Suthdencheswurth' dimidium feodum de feodo Hervici de Stafford'.

Henricus de Tubbeney in eadem villa dimidium feodum de feodo comitis de Ferrariis.

Johannes de Pavilly in Cherleton' j. feodum de feodo Walteri de Clifford'.

BERKS. 847

S.ij.23.I.486-489 - cont.

Egidius de Erley in eadem villa dimidium feodum de feodo Hugonis de Burlay.

Galfridus de Bono Fossato in eadem villa quartam partem unius feodi de feodo com' de Warewyk'.

Johannes de la Wyke in eadem villa quartam partem unius feodi de feodo comitis de Ferrariis.

Stephanus de Curson' in Westlaking' j. feodum de feodo comitis de Ferrariis predicti.

Willelmus Saumon in Shallingeford' et Radulfus Sturmy in Wachenesfeld' j. feodum de feodo abbatis Abbendonie.

Willelmus Gernon in Geing' dimidium feodum de dono domini regis de terris Normannorum.

Hospitularii Ierosolyme in Boclande j. feodum de feodo abbatis Abbendonie.

Henricus de Pesey in Pesey j. feodum de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Willelmus de Bakepuz in Kingeston', Cumpton' et Estene dimidium feodum de feodo comitis de Ferrariis.

Philippus de Fifhyde in Fifhyde j. feodum de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Philippus de Sancta Helena et Johannes de Turbervile in Catmere dimidium feodum de feodo eiusdem comitis.

Henricus de Tubbeney in Tubbeney j. feodum de feodo abbatis Abbendonie.

Willelmus de Merton' in Appelton' dimidium feodum de feodo Hunfridi Videlu.

Fulco de Codray in Lifford' j. feodum de feodo abbatis Abbendonie.

Johannes de Aura in Suthcote j. feodum de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Robertus Hemming' in Esthannea j. feodum de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Johannes Basset in Northmorton' j. feodum de feodo comitis de Warewyk'.

Alanus de Parnham et Robertus de Auvers in Eston', Simon de Luuek' et predictus Robertus in Wynterburn j. feodum de eodem feodo.

Willelmus de Hastinges in Eton' j. feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite.

Reginaldus de Albo Monasterio in Burwardescote j. feodum de feodo comitis Cestrie.

Rollandus de Odingeseles in eadem villa j. feodum de feodo eius comitis.

Ingnardus filius Stephani in Coleshull' dimidium feodum de feodo Willelmi de Stotevil'.

Galfridus Foliot in Edwyneston' dimidium feodum de feodo abbatis de Glastonia.

Henricus de Batonia in Assebir' dimidium feodum de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Willelmus de Heriz, Robertus de Knittel' et Willelmus de Wavering' in Wendlesclive j. feodum de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Simon filius Hugonis in Ordeiston' j. feodum de feodo Ricardi de Scropes,

848 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.486-489 - cont.

Gilebertus de Columbariis in Hordewell' et Uffinton' j. feodum de feodo abbatis Abbendonie.

Warinus filius Geroldi in Kingeaton' j. feodum de feodo Margerie de Ripariis.

Idem Warinus in Fauflore j. feodum de feodo abbatis Abbendonie.

Magister Reginaldus de Wulvricheston' in Wulvrichest' dimidium feodum de feodo episcopi Wyntoniensis.

Robertus de Bello Campo et Willelmus de Burmingham in Maydenecote j. feodum de feodo Eve de Breuse.

Henricus de Hynton' in Estbir' tres partes unius feodi de feodo Willelmi le Moyne.

Gilebertus de Marisco in Estbir' dimidium feodum, et tenet de domino rege in capite.

Radulfus Barry de Bochamton' in Bochamt' j. feodum de feodo episcopi Londoniensis.

Fulco filius Warini in Chepinglamburn dimidium feodum, et tenet de domino rege in capite.

Willelmus de Plugenet in eadem villa dimidium feodum, et tenet de domino rege in capite.

Willelmus Gernon in Uplamburn dimidium feodum de feodo quod Willelmi de Briwer' quondam fuit.

Johannes de Turbervil' in Henreth' j. feodum de feodo comitis de Ferrariis.

Alicia de Samford' in Chilton' j. feodum de feodo abbatis Abbendonie.

Simon de Leuek', Robertus de Auvers in Chilton' et Henricus de Pesey in Colrug' j. feodum de feodo Willelmi de Wyndel'.

Galfridus Ridel in Hodicote j. feodum de feodo Radulfi de Mortuo Mari.

Philippus de Sancta Helena et Johannes de Turbervil' in Sancta Helena, [1] Frileford', Lifford', Sutton' et Hanreth' tria feoda de feodo abbatis Abbendonie.

Willelmus de Seuekewurth' in Seuek' et Baywurth' duo feoda de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Rogerus de Wytteham in Wytteham j. feodum de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Willelmus de Legh' in Legh' j. feodum de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Hugo filius Henrici in Abbendon', Drayton' et Samford' j. feodum de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Abbas Abbendonie de terra que fuit Nicholai de Sunningewell'

Boxore, Gareford', Wurth' et Cumenor', unum feodum et dimidium de feodo eius abbatis.

Johannes de Chereburk' in Suggewurth' dimidium feodum de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Henricus de Erley in Erley j. feodum, et tenet de domino rege in capite.

Johannes de Berkham in Berkeham j. feodum de feodo predicti Henrici de Erley.


[1] Perhaps the parish of St. Helen, Abingdon.

BERKS. 849

S.ij.23.I.486-489 - cont.

Egidius de E[r]ley in Erley j. feodum de feodo Elie Giffard'.

Willelmus Banastre in Finghamsted' j. feodum de feodo Roberti Achard'.

Robertus de Sottebroc in Sottebroc j. feodum, et tenet de domino rege in capite.

Ricardus de Scifrewast' in Cliffewar' dimidium feodum, et tenet de domino rege.

Willelmus de Colewurth' in Elinton' dimidium feodum de feodo Henrici de Pinkeny.

Henricus de Elinton' in eadem villa dimidium feodum de feodo eiusdem Henrici.

Reginaldus le Forester in Waltham quartam partem unius feodi de feodo Willelmi de Wyndeles'.

Johannes Banastre in Silhamsted' j. feodum de feodo Roberti Achard'.

Willelmus Revel in Wulavinton' dimidium feodum de feodo eiusdem Roberti Achard'.

Richerus Neirnut in Uffinton' j. feodum de feodo Henrici de Pinkeny.

Robertus de Burgefeld' in Burgefeld' dimidium feodum de feodo Radulfi de Mortuo Mari.

Robertus de Auvers in Weghefeld' j. feodum de feodo Willelmi de Wyndeles'.

Prior de Humle in Chaddehang' quartam partem unius feodi de feodo Mathei de Columbariis.

Nicholaus de Hedinton' in Pesemere dimidium feodum de feodo eiusdem Mathei.

Walterus de la Wyle in La Wyle j. feodum de feodo eiusdem Mathei.

Robertus de Hafford' in Hafford' duo feoda de feodo eiusdem Mathei.

Radulfus de Mackeney in Mackeney j. feodum de feodo epuscopi Wyntoniensis.

Galfridus de Mandevile in Sottewell' j. feodum de feodo abbatis de La Hyde, Wyntonie.

Radulfus Mefelin tenet in Benham dimidium feodum de Ricardo de Livinton', et dictus Ricardus de Livinton' tenet manerium de Benham de domino rege per seriantiam.

Galfridus de Bakeset in Bakeset dimidium feodum de feodo Willelmi de Wyndel'. [1]

Ricardus de Dunmere in Hertleg' quartam partem unius feodi de feodo. (Unfinished.)

Johannes de la Huse in Paddewurth' quintam partem unius feodi de feodo. (Unfinished.)

Droco de Weston' in Weston' dimidium feodum de feodo abbatis Abbendonie.


[1] " Galfridus de Baggechete habet respectum usque a die Pasche in xv. dies de xx.s. de scutagio Wasconie de dimidio feodo militis in Baggechete de quo facit wardam castro nostro de Windlesores." Memoranda Roll, L.T.R. no. 14, m. 7d. Cf. Inq. post mortem, Hen. III. file 17, no. 7.

850 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.486-489 - cont.

Willelmus de Aldebir' in Aldebir' [1] et abbas Abbendonie in Ore quintam partem unius feodi de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Walterus de Gosey in Gosey quintam partem unius feodi de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

[Endorsed:-] Rotuli de particulis scutagii regis ad transfretucionem suam in Pictaviam anno regni sui xxvj. scilicet ad iij. marcas. Berkesire.

Berk'. In libro. Item Wilt' in dorso. In libro.

S.ij.23.I.490-493.

Feoda tenta de Waltero Marescallo, Comite Pembrochie, qui habet breve habendi scutagia sua.

Johannes de Plesseto, Matheus Huse, Willelmus de Sancta Elena et Robertus de Sanford' in West Witteham unum feodum de feodo predicti Walteri de honore Giffardi.

Petrus Malerbe et Hugo de Sancto Mauro in West Henneye dimidium feodum de feodo eiusdem Walteri.

Radulfus de Kameis in Nordengesworth' duas partes de feodo eiusdem Walteri et eodem honore.

Feoda tenta de Rogero de Sumeri qui habet breve.

Margareta de Sumeri in Bradefeld' unum feodum de feodo predicti Rogeri.

Robertus de Offintun' in Offintun' dimidium feodum de feodo predicti Rogeri.

Willelmus de Englefeld' in Englefeld' unum feodum de eodem feodo.

Petrus de Yatingeden' in Yatingedene unum feodum de eodem feodo.

Walterus le Mansel, Nicholaus de Ingepenne et abbas de Tichefeld' in Ingepenne duo feoda de eodem feodo.

Petrus de Stanford' in Stanford' unum feodum de eodem feodo.

Johannes de Cormailes et Philippus de Berewik' in Hodicote unum feodum de eodem feodo.

Matillis de Gornay in Kingestun' Rogeri unum feodum de eodem feodo.

Willelmus de Bello Campo in Cumptun' unum feodum de eodem feodo.

Johannes de Elsefeld' in Estildesle unum feodum de eodem feodo.

Feoda tenta de Comite Herefordie qui habet breve.

Thomas de Kenet in Wasinge dimidium feodum de feodo predicti comitis.

Philippus de Cumbrewelle in Godingetlod' dimidium feodum de eodem feodo.

Robertus de la Harleter' in Holebenham dimidium feodum de eodem feodo.

Sawallus de Osevile in Widehay et Estildesle duo feoda de eodem feodo.


[1] Delete in Aldebir.

BERKS. 851

S.ij.23.I.490-493 - cont.

Willelmus le Flemeng' in Stretle tres partes unius feodi de eodem feodo.

Feoda tenta de Hamone de Krevequor qui habet breve.

Galfridus de Boklond' in Niwentun' sextam partem unius feodi de eodem Hamone.

Willelmus de Holekote in Berecote iijtam partem unius feodi de eodem feodo.

Elias de Niwentun' in Niwentun' iiijtam. partem unius feodi de eodem feodo.

Walterus filius Willelmi in Farndon' dimidium feodum de eodem feodo.

Feoda tenta de Simone de Monteforti, Comite Leycestrie, qui habet breve.

Willelmus de Britinoll' in Sandon' unum feodum de feodo predicti comitis.

Johannes Mansell' de ballio domini regis in Westildesle dimidium feodum de eodem comite.

Feoda tenta de Giliberto de Gant qui habet breve.

Gilibertus de Sanford' in Langelegh', Robertus de Bradtle in Bradelein Berkesir', et Henricus filius Roberti in Le Ewelme in comitatu Oxonie duo feoda de feodo predicti Giliberti.

Feoda tenta de Rogero de Quincy, comite Wintonie, qui habet breve.

Agnes de Ponte Audomari, Johannes de Actun', Willelmus filius Godefridi, in Westildesle unum feodum de dicto Rogero.

Willelmus de Siffrewast in Hamstede, Aldeworth' et Purle unum feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite, et habet breve.

Feoda que Galfridus Dispensator tenet de ballio domini regis racione custodie filii et heredis Roberti Musard'; in Spersolt' et Lamburn' unum feodum, et habet breve inde.

Ricardus filius Johannis in Winterburne unum feodum de feodo predicti heredis.

Idem Galfridus in Sualefeld' dimidium feodum de feodo com' de Warewik', et inde habet aliud breve.

Johannes de Frethorne in Chelreye unum feodum de Nicolao de Molis, unde predictus Nicolas habet breve.

Ricardus Lungespeye in Aventun' unum feodum de feodo Willelmi Lungespey, unde predictus Willelmus habet breve.

Rannulfus Frethoxe in Shaldeburne dimidium feodum de feodo Hereberti filii Petri, qui habet breve.

Rogerus de la Hide in Esthenneye unum feodum de feodo Hugonis de Vivun qui habet breve.

Johannes de Nevill' in Suthmortun' dimidium feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite, et habet breve.

852 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.490-493 - cont.

Johannes de Plesseto et Johanna de Sanford' in Suthmortun' decimam partem unius feodi quod tenet de domino rege in capite, et habet breve.

Robertus de Gynnes in Bestlesdene unum feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite, qui habet breve.

Robertus filius Radulfi in Shilftun' iiijtam partem unius feodi de feodo Johannis de Burg', unde idem Johannes habet breve.

Willelmus le Bretun' et Johannes de Riparia in Blacgrave iiijtam partem unius feodi de feodo dicti Johannis qui habet breve.

Philippus de Sandrevill' in Suthmortun' et Eneburne j. feodum de feodo comitis de Aubemarle, qui habet breve.

Petrus de Monteforti in Remeham unum feodum de feodo com' de Warewik', qui habet respectum usque ad festum Sancti Yllarii per breve domini regis. [1]

Petrus de [2] Loreng' in Diddeworth' quintam partem unius feodi de feodo Willelmi de Bello Campo, unde idem Willelmus habet breve.

Prior de Sancta Frepeswytha in Knicteton' j. feodum de honore de Sancto Walerico quem tenet Ricardus comes Cornubie.

Adam de Elfreton' in Elfreton' quartam partem unius feodi de eodem honore.

Robertus de Scindlesham in Scindlesham quintam partem unius feodi de feodo episcopi Saresberiensis, et habet breve.

Ricardus Bulloc in Erburgefeld' quartam partem et vicesimam partem unius feodi de feodo eiusdem episcopi.

[On the dorse:-] Nomina resistencium de eodem comitatu.

De Waltero Marescallo j. feodum in Spene de feodo de Kinton'. Scrutatur.

S.ij.23.I.531-544.

Inquisitores, Galfridus Martel, Johannes de Henreth, Petrus de Yetingeden', Robertus de Hafford', Nicholausde Ingepenn', Stephanus Walensis, Robertus de Wykeholt', Radulfus Barry, Philippus de Alta Ripa, Robertus Hemming', Randullus Fretoxe, et Ricardus de la More, jurati per preceptum domini regis ad inquirendum de singulis feodis militum in comitatu Berkes, et qui ea teneant, etc.

Feoda Abbatis Abbendonie in comitatu Berk'. In rotulo.

Johannes de Aura tenet in Suthcote unum feodum militis de feodo abbatis Abbendonie, scilicet de baronia sua.

Fulco de Codray tenet in Lifford' unum feodum de eodem feodo et de eadem baronia. a.

Henricus de Tubbeney in Tubbeney, Uffinton' et Frileford' quatuor partes unius feodi de eadem baronia.

Robertus Hemming' in Esthenney unum feodum de eadem baronia.

Gilebertus de Columbariis in Hordewell' et Uffinton' unum feodum de eadem baronia.

Warinus filius Geroldi in Fauflor unum feodum de eadem baronia.


[1] Close Rolls 1237-1242; p. 475.
[2] Read le.

BERKS. 853

S.ij.23.I.531-544 - cont.

Alicia de Samford' in dotem de hereditate que fuit Thome de Samford' in Chilton' et Pubbewurth' unum feodum de eadem baronia.

Philippus de Sancta Helena et Johannes de Turbevile in Abbendon', Henreth', Frileford' et Lifford' tria feoda de eadem baronia.

Willelmus de Seuekewrth' in Seuekewrth et Baywurth' et Mergham duo feoda de eadem baronia.

Rogerus de Wytteham in Wytteham unum feodum de eadem baronia. a.

Willelmus de Leg' in Leye unum feodum de eadem baronia.

Hugo filius Henrici in Abbendon', Drayton' et Samford' quatuor partes unius feodi de eadem baronia.

Robertus de Wyleby in Sunningewell', Boxor', Comenor', Wurth' et Gareford' unum feodum et dimidium de eadem baronia.

Thomas de Hynton' in Suggewurth' dimidium feodum de eadem baronia.

Droco de Weston' in Weston' dimidium feodum de eadem baronia.

Thomas de Gimeges in Bradel' dimidium feodum de eadem baronia.

Walterus de Ripariis in Beden' duo feoda et dimidium de eadem baronia.

Galfridus de Wancy et priorissa de Littelemor' in Lewarton' unum feodum de eadem baronia.

Isabella de Mortuo Mari de hereditate Hereberti filii Petri in Lechamsted' unum feodum de eadem baronia.

Radulfus Sturmy in Wachenefeld' et Willelmus Saumonin Shallingford' unum feodum de eadem baronia.

Hospitularii Sancti Johannis Ierosolyme in Boclande unum feodum de eadem baronia. a.

Henricus de Pesey in Pesey, Estlaking' et La More unum feodum de eadem baronia.

Willelmus de Aldebir' et abbas Abbendonie in Ore quintam partem unius feodi de eadem baronia.

Walterus de Gosey in Gosey quintam partem unius feodi de baronia eadem.

Johannes de Laking' in Estlaking' septimam partem unius feodi de eadem baronia.

Thomas Barre in Keninton' quintam partem unius feodi de eadem baronia.

Johannes de Samford' in Samford' sextain partem unius feodi de eadem baronia.

Johannes de Henreth in Mergham et Westwyk' quintam partem unius feodi de eadem baronia.

Thomas de Abbendon' in Abbendon' duas partes sexte partis unius feodi de eadem baronia.

Adam, Herebertus, Radulfus, fratres eius, Robertus le Vavassur et Reginaldus filius Henrici in Esthenney quintam partem unius feodi de eadem baronia.

Willelmus Calemond' in Wytteham quartam partem unius feodi de eadem baronia.

854 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.531-544 - cont.

Adam de Periton in Bay wurth' et Sunningewell' quintam partem unius feodi de eadem baronia. a.

Feoda Comitis de Ferrariis. In rotulo.

Matheus Huse in Bukesyate cum una hida terre in Henreth, quam Johannes de Turbervil' tenet de eodem Matheo, unum feodum de feodo comitis de Ferrariis de honore de Tuttebir'.

Philippus de Fifhyde in Fifhide unum feodum de feodo eiusdem comitis et de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Bakepuz in Kingeston', Cumpton' et Esseden' dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et de eodem honore.

Philippus de Sancta Helena et Johannes de Turbervil' in Catmere dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et de eodem honore.

Oliverus de Eynicurt in Friglesham et Estyldesl' duas partes unius feodi de eodem feodo et de codem honore.

Johannes de la Wyk' in Cherleton' quartam partem unius feodi de eodem feodo et de eodem honore.

Henricus de Tubbeney in Dencheswurth' dimidium feodum de eodem honore et de eodem feodo.

Stephanus de Curson in Westlaking' unum feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Radulfus de Scaccario in Wulavinton' quartam partem unius feodi de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Feoda Henrici de Pinkeny. In rotulo.

Egidius de Erleg', Willelmus le Bastard et Radulfus de Scaccario in Migham unum feodum de feodo Henrici de Pinkeny de honore de Wyndeles'.

Nicholaus de Aufricar' et Willelmus de Clervaus in Enebern' dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Willelmus de Colewurth' in Elinton' dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Henricus de Elinton' in eadem vllla dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Richerus Neirnut in Uffinton' unum feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Feoda Radulfi de Mortuo Mari. In rotulo.

Adam de Brimton' in Brimton' duas partes unius feodi de feodo Radulfi de Mortuo Mari de honore de Wygemor'.

Prior de Poghel' in Cuserug' unum feodum de feodo eiusdem Radulfi et de eodem honore.

Ricardus de Pesemere in Pesemere unum feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Galfridus Ridel in Hodicote unum feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Robertus de Burgefeld' in Burgefeld' dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

BERKS. 855

S.ij.23.I.531-544 - cont.

Feoda Rogeri de Sumerv. Breve.

Willelmus de Englefeld' in Englefeld' unum feodum de feodo Rogeri de Sumery de honore de Duddeleg'.

Robertus de Uffinton' in Uffinton' dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Nicholaus le Buteyller in Bradefeld' quartam partem unius feodi de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Petrus de Yetingcden in Yetingeden unum feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Walterus le Mansel in Ingepenne unum feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore,

Nicholaus de Ingepenne in eadem villa dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Abbas de Tychefeld' in Ingepenne dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Petrus de Stamford' in Stamford' unum feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Johannes de Cormaylles in Hodicote dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Philippus de Berewyk' in Hodicote dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Matillis de Gurnay ut de warda terre heredis Rogeri de Kingeston' in Kingeston' unum feodum de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Bello Campo in Cumpton' unum feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Johannes de Elsefeld' in Estyldesl' unum feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Feoda Comitis Herefordie. Breve.

Thomas de Kenet in Wahesing' dimidium feodum de feodo comitis Hereford de honore Herefordie.

Philippus de Cumbrewell' in Godingeflod dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Robertus de la Harletere in Holebenham dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Sewellus de Osevile in Estyldesl' et Wydehay duo feoda de eodem comite de honore de Plesseto.

Feoda que fuerunt Roberti Achard'. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Englefeld' tenet maneria de Aldremanneston' et Spersolt' ad firmam de balfiodomini regis que fuerunt Roberti Achard', pro quibus maneriis una cum Finghamsted', Sylhamsted', Colethrop et Wulavinton' Willelmi Revel debuit domino regi [servicium unius militis cancelled]. Quia dominica sunt in manu regis, a.

Willelmus Banastre tenet Finghamsted' pro uno feodo militis de feodo dicti Roberti Achard'.

Johannes Banastre tenet Sylhamsted' pro uno feodo de feodo predicti Roberti.

856 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.531-544 - cont.

Willelmus de Brittinoles tenet Colethrop' pro uno feodo de feodo eiusdem Roberti.

Willelmus Revel in Wulavinton' dimidium feodum de feodo eiusdem Roberti Achard'. a.

Feoda Comitis Devonie. Breve.

Robertus de Hayford' in Hayford' duo feoda de feodo Baldewyni de Ripariis, comitis Devonie.

Walterus de la Wyle in La Wyle unum feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Nicholaus de Hedinton' in Pesemere unum feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Prior de Hurnle in Cheddehang' quartam partem unius feodi de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Feoda Com' de Warewyk'.

Petrus de Monte Forti in Rumeham unum feodum de feodo com' de Warewyk'.

Johannes Belet de Enebern et Andreas de la Breche in Enebern dimidium feodum de feodo eodem et eodem honore. In rotulo.

Ricardus de Elfreton' in Elfreton' quartam partem unius feodi de eodem feodo et eodem honore. In rotulo.

Galfridus de Bono Fossato in Cherleton' quartam partem unius feodi de eodem feodo et eodem honore. In rotulo.

Johannes Basset in Northmorton' unum feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore. In rotulo.

Galfridus Dispensator in Swalefeld' dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore. Breve.

Robertus de Gygnes in Bastlesden' unum feodum quod habet de dono domini regis1 et fuit de feodo eiusdem com' de Warewyk. Breve.

Alanus de Farnham et Robertus de Auvers in Eston', et Simon de Luuek et dictus Robertus in Wynterburn unum feodum de eodem feodo, unde in Eston' sunt due partes unius feodi et in Wynterburn tercia pars feodi. In rotulo.

Feoda particularia tenta de domino Rege.

Philippus de Columbariis in Shawe unum feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite.

Nicholaus de Hedinton' in Pesemere dimidium feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite. t.

Johannes Belet de Ingeflod in Ingeflod quintam partem unius feodi quod tenet de domino rege in capite. t.

Anketillus Malore in Suthfalel' dimidium feodum quod tenet de ballio domini regis de terra Normannorum. t.

Willelmus Gernon in Estgeing' dimidium feodum quod tenet de dono domini regis de terra Brittannorum. t.


[1] Calendar of Charter Rolls, vol. i. p. 261.

BERKS. 857

S.ij.23.I.531-544 - cont.

Willelmus de Hastinges in Eton' unum feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite. t. Habet respectum in Glouc.

Willelmus le Moyne in Estbir' tres partes unius feodi de domino rege in capite, et eandem terram tenet de eo Henricus de Hynton' in socagium. Inde loquendum.

Gilebertus de Marisco in Estbir' dimidium feodum, et tenet de domino rege in capite. t.

Fulco filius Warini in Chepinglamburn dimidium feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite. t. In rotulo in summa.

Willelmus de Plugeney in eadem villa dimidium feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite. t.

Willelmus Gernon in Uplamburn de terra que fuit Willelmi de Briwer' dimidium feodum quod nunc tenet de domino rege in capite. t.

Henricus de Erley in Erley unum feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite; nec tenetur domino regi pro Erley et Bercham nisi de uno feodo. t.

Johannes de Berkham in Berkham unum feodum quod tenet de dicto Henrico de Erley. t.

Robertus de Sottebroc tenet in Sottebroc unum feodum de domino rege in capite. t.

Ricardus de Scifrewast' in Clifware dimidium feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite. t.

Johannes de Nevill' in Suthmorton' dimidium feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite. t.

Johannes de Plesseto et Johanna de Samford' de terra que fuit Hugonis de Samford' decimam partem unius feodi et tenent de domino rege. t. Breve.

Feoda Willelmi de Scifrewast. Breve.

Willelmus de Scifrewast in Hamsted', Aldewurth' et Purle unum feodum quod tenet de domino rege in capite. a.

Feoda que fuerunt Roberti Musard'. Breve.

Galfridus Dispensator in Spersolt et Lambern de terra que fuit Roberti Musard' unum feodum de ballio domini regis.

Ricardus filius Johannis in Wynterburn' unum feodum de feodo quod fuit prefati Roberti Musard' et baronia sua.

De Honore Leycestrie. Breve.

Willelmus de Brittinoles in Sandone unum feodum de feodo Simonia de Monte Forti de honore Leycestrie.

Johannes Maunsel de ballio domini regis in Westyldesl' dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Agnes de Ponte Audomari et participes eius in eadem villa unum feodum quod tenent de comite Wyntonie' et est de eodem honore.

Feoda que fuerunt Comitis Cestrie. In rotulo.

Reginaldus de Albo Monasterio in Burewardescote unum feodum de feodo comitis Cestrie de honore Cestrie.

858 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.531-544 - cont.

Rodlandus de Odingeseles in eadem villa unum feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Alanus de Farnham in Drayton' decimam partem unius feodi de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Feodum Willelmi de Stotevile. In rotulo.

Ignardus filius Stephani in Coleshull' dimidium feodum de feodo Willelmi de Stotevile.

Feoda Abbatis de Glaston'. In rotulo.

Galfridus Foliot in Edwyneston' dimidium feodum de feodo abbatis de Glaston'.

Henricus de Batonia in Essebir' dimidium feodum de feodo eiusdem abbatis.

Willelmus de Heris, Robertus de Knittel' et Willelmus de Wavere [1] in Wendlesclive unum feodum de eodem feodo abbatis.

Feoda Ricardi de Scrupes.

Simon filius Hugonis in Ordeiston' unum feodum de feodo Ricardi de Scrupes de baronia de Scrupes.

Willelmus de Kampan in Chelry unum feodum de eodem feodo et eadem baronia.

Feoda Thome de Lascel'. In rotulo.

Simon de Luuek et Robertus de Auvers in Chilton' tres partes unius feodi de feodo Thome de Lasceles de baronia de Wyndel'.

Henricus de Pesey in Colrug' quartam partem unius et eiusdem feodi de eodem feodo et eodem honore de Wyndel'.

Robertus de Auvers in Weghefeld' unum feodum de feodo Willelmi de Wyndel' et de eodem honore de Wyndel'.

Reginaldus le Forester in Waltham quartam partem unius feodi de feodo eiusdem Willelmi et eodem honore.

Galfridus de Bakeshet in Bakeshet dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et honore.

[Heres Oseberti de Westhakburn in Westhak' decimam partem unius feodi quam tenet de Ada de Burneham de feodo predicti Willelmi et eodem honore de Wynde'. Cancelled.] Quia respondet de integro dimidio feodo in Bukingeham.

Feoda Comitis Marescalli. Breve.

Johannes de Plesseto, Matheus Huse, Willelmus de Sancta Helena et Robertus de Samford' in West Wytteham unum feodum de feodo Walteri Marescalli, comitis Pembrochie' de honore Gyffard'.

Radulfus de Cameys in Northdencheswurth' unum feodum de feodo eiusdem Marescalli et eodem honore, cum quinta parte unius feodi quam Johannes de la Huse tenet in Paddewurth'.


[1] The final letter is written over an erasure showing traces of a g.

BERKS. 859

S.ij.23.I.531-544 - cont.

Petrus Malherbe et Hugo de Sancto Mauro in Westhenney dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eodem honore.

Fulco filius Warini tenet manerium de Waneting' cum pertinenciis, et vetus dominicum fuit, et tenet illud de Waltero comite Marescallo, comite Pembrochie, per servicium unius militis.

Feodum Johannis de Curtenay. In rotulo.

Walterus de Cornevile tenet in Sutton' tresdecimam partem unius feodi de Johanne de Curtenay.

Feodum de Baronia de Boclande. Breve.

Galfridus de Boclande in Newenton' sextam partem unius feodi de feodo Hamonis de Crevequer de baronia de Boclande.

Elias de Newenton in eadem villa quintam partem unius feodi de eodem feodo et eadem baronia.

Willelmus de Hulecote in Berecote quartam partem unius feodi de eodem feodo et eadem baronia.

Walterus filius Willelmi in Farendon' dimidium feodum de eodem feodo et eadem baronia.

Feoda Comitis Gloucestrie. In rotulo.

Prior de Poghel' in Bagenor' dimidium feodum de feodo comitis Gloucestrie de honore de Gloucestria.

Ricardus de Dunmere in Hurtley quartam partem unius feodi de Godefrido Waspaylle de honore comitis Glovernie.

Feodum de Breepennio. In rotulo.

Walterus Marescallus, comes Pembrochie, in dominico suo in Spenes unum feodum de honore de Breepennio. [1]

Feodum de Kinton'. In rotulo.

Bartholomeus de la Huse in Denford' unum feodum de feodo de Kinton'.

Feodum Walteri de Seye. In rotulo.

Johannes Mautravers in Chelrey unum feodum de feodo Walteri de Seye de honore de Lodelawe.

Feodum Gileberti Peche. In rotulo.

Willelmus filius Henrici in Estcifford' dimidium feodum de feodo Gileberti Peche.

Feodum Ricardi de Livinton'. In rotulo.

Radulfus Meyfelyn in Benham Ricardi de Livinton terciam partem unius feodi, et tenet de prefato Ricardo, et idem Ricardus tenet manerium illud de domino rege in capite per seriantiam.


[1] This name is written over an erasure.

860 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.531-544 - cont.

Feodum Hervici de Stafford. In rotulo.

Elias de Bagenor' et Hervicus de Wylbricton' in Suthdencheswurth' dimidium feodum de feodo Hervici de Stafford' de honore de Stafford'.

Feodum Walteri de Clifford'. In rotulo.

Johannes de Pavilly in Cherleton' unum feodum de feodo Walteri de Clifford' de honore de Clifford'.

Feodum Hugonis de Burlay. In rotulo.

Egidius de Erley in Cherleton' dimidium feodum de feodo Hugonis de Burlay de honore de Bristestowe in Cornubia.

Feodum Humfridi de Videlo. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Merton' in Appelton' dimidium feodum de feodo Humfridi de Videlupo.

Feodum de Brecpennio. In rotulo.

Robertus de Bello Campo et Willelmus de Burmingeham in Maydenecote unum feodum de feodo quod fuit Willelmi de Breuse de honore de Brecpennio.

Feodum Margerie de Ripariis. In rotulo.

Warinus filius Geroldi in Kingeston' unum feodum de feodo Margerie de Ripariis de cameraria.

Feodum Episcopi Londoniensis. In rotulo.

Radulfus Barry in Bochamton' unum feodum de feodo episcopi Londoniensis.

Feoda Episcopi Wyntoniensis. Et ballivi episcopatus non permittunt intrare vicecomitem.

Magister Reginaldus de Wulvricheston'in Wulvricheston' dimidium feodum de feodo episcopi Wyntoniensis.

Radulfus de Mackeney in Mackeney unum feodum de feodo eiusdem episcopi Wyntoniensis.

Ballivi episcopi respondebunt.

Feodum Abbatis de Hida.

Galfridus de Mandevil' in Sottewell' unum feodum de feodo abbatis Wyntonie de la Hyde.

Abbas respondebit.

Feodum Elie Giffard'. In rotulo.

Egidius de Erley in Erley unum feodum de feodo Elie Giffard' de Brumesfeld'.

BERKS. 861

S.ij.23.I.531-544 - cont.

Johannes de Frethorn' in Chelrey unum feodum de feodo Nicholai de Molis, scilicet de baronia que fuit Jacobi de Novo Mercato. Breve.

Randulfus Fretoxe in Shaldeburn' dimidium feodum de feodo Herberti filii Petri. Breve.

Rogerus de la Hyde in Esthenney unum feodum de feodo Hugonis de Vivon'. Breve.

Robertus filius Radulfi in Shulfton' quartam partem unius feodi de feodo Johannis de Burgo de baronia de Boclande. Breve.

Willelmus le Breton' et Johannes de Riparia quartam partem unius feodi in Blacgrave de feodo eiusdem Johannis de Burgo. Breve.

Petrus le Loreng' in Diddewurth' quintam partem unius feodi de feodo Willelmi de Bello Campo de Bedeford. Breve.

Feodum Comitis de Albemarle. Breve.

Philippus de Sandrevil' in Suthmorton' et Eneburn unum feodum de feodo comitis de Albemarl'.

Feoda Willelmi Longespey. Breve.

Ricardus Longespey in Avinton' quartam partem unius feodi de feodo Willelmi Longespey de baronia que fuit Ricardi de Camvil'.

Reginaldus de Albo Monasterio tenet quandam partem manerii de Scriveham pro septima parte unius feodi de eodem Willelmo Longespey, et fuit vetus dominicum.

Philippus de Alta Ripa quandam partem eiusdem manerii pro vicesima parte unius feodi de eodem Willelmo.

Feodum Gileberti de Gaunt. Breve.

Gilebertus de Samford' in Langeley et Robertus de Bradel' in Bradel' unum feodum et terciam partem unius feodi de feodo Gileberti de Gaunt.

Feoda Comitis Ricardi de Honore de Sancto Walerico. Breve.

Prior de Sancta Frethewytha Oxonie in Knicteton' unum feodum de honore de Sancto Walerico.

Adam de Elfreton' in Elfreton' quartam partem unius feodi de eodem honore.

Ricardus comes Pictavie et Cornubie in Harewell', et Bartholomeus Peche in Eling unum feodum de eodem honore.

Johanna de Kingeston', Henricus Franck' de Pesey et Ricardus de Kakel' in Pesey duas partes unius feodi de eodem honore.

Feoda Episcopi Saresberiensis. Respondet per se.

Robertus de Scindlesham in Scindlesham quintam partem unius feodi de feodo episcopi Saresberiensis.

Ricardus Bulluc in Erburgefeld' quartam partem et vicesimam partem unius feodi de feodo eiusdem episcopi Saresberiensis.

In libro. Scrutatur.

862 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.545-550.

Inquisitores ad inquirendum de villis que non tenentur per servicia militaria, scilicet per que servicia teneantur in comitatu Berkes, Galfridus Martel, Johannes de Hanreth', Petrus de Ietingeden', Robertus de Hafford', Nicholaus de Ingepenn', Stephanus Walensis. Robertus de Wykeholt', Robertus Hemming', Randulfus Fretoxe, Ricardus de la More, et Walterus Goldhord.

Abbas Abbendonie tenet Abendon', La Berton', Cumenor, Radeley, Suthhenctesey, Northenctesey, Boteley, Swyneford', et La Dene et Wotton' cum eorum pertinenciis in dominico suo in puram et perpetuam elemosinam, nec facit inde scutagium.

Idem abbas tenet in dominico suo Farnberg', Schalingeford' de baronia sua.

Idem eciam tenet Cerney et Wurth', Offinton' et Middelton' et Draiton', Gosey, Gareford' et Mercham et quandam partem de Frileford', Estwytteham et Appelford', Estlaking' et Westgeng' et Wachenesfeld', Draycote et La More in dominico suo de elemosina, nec facit scutagium.

Chivele, Weliford', Boxore, Holebenham, Snellesmore et Ore cum pertinenciis eiusdem abbatis Abbendonie et conventus, et pertinent ad cameram predictorum abbatis et conventus.

Idem abbas tenet in dominico suo Wunekefeld' et La Hurste cum eorum pertinenciis, et pertinent ad quoquinam monachorum de elemosina ut dicitur.

Idem abbas tenet in Esthanney sex hidas terre de elemosina.

Prior de Hurnle tenet in dominico suo villatam de Hurnle de elemosina comitis de Mandevile ut dicitur.

Magister Milicie Templi villatam de Butlesham in dominico suo de elemosina Roberti de Ferrariis, comitis de Dereby.

Hugo de Sancto Pileberto in dominico suo Creswell' infra limites manerii de Bray de domino rege in capite per seriantiam de la Huse.

Abbas de Certesey tenet in dominico suo Wytewaltham de dono et elemosina Sancti Edwardi.

Abbas de Sancta Cruce tenet in dominico suo Heiwodewaltham in elemosina.

Weregrave cum pertinenciis, Culham, Warefeld', Wautham, et Suthelak fuerunt vetus dominieum et data fuerunt in elemosina episcopatui Wyntonie.

Prior de Hurnle tenet in dominico suo Yashamsted de dono et elemosina Sancti Edwardi.

Matheus de Charneus tenet medietatem de Didewurth' de Henrico de Hastinges, et nescitur per quod servicium, nec facit scutagium.

Episcopus Saresberiensis in dominico suo Sunninge et Wokingeham.

Villata de Nova Wyndelesor' et de Veteri sunt in manu domini regis.

Abbas de Rading' in Nova Wyndeles' unam hidam terre de elemosina predecessorum domini regis.

Henricus de Stowell' et Robertus Pippard' in eadem unam hidam per seriantiam de baronia Randulfi del Brok'.

Wymundus de Raleg' in eadem unam hidam per seriantiam de baronia Roberti Beleth.

BERKS. 863

S.ij.23.I.545-550 - cont.

Hugo de Haudeng' et Thomas de Lasceles et Simon de Averenches in eadem quasdam terras de baronia sua de Wynd', nec faciunt scutagium.

Margareta de Sumery tenet manerium de Bradefeld' in dominico suo in dotem de hereditate Rogeri de Sumery, nec facit inde scutagium.

Hospitularii Sancti Johannis Ierosolyme tenent medietatem de Wulavinton' in elemosina de dono Galfridi de Boscrevill'.

Fulco de Coudray tenet duas partes manerii de Paddewurth' per seriantiam inveniendi unum servientem quando regina transfretabit ad tenendum unam cordam.

Radulfus de Mortuo Mari tenet manerium de Stretfeld' in dominico suo de domino rege in capite, et est de honore suo de Wygemore, nec facit scutagium.

Hervicus Beleth tenet Suthcote in dominico suo, et est de honore de La Keneppe, nec facit scutagium.

Alexander de Truncwell' tenet Truncwell' de Thoma Blundo per servicium duorum solidorum per annum pro omni servicio.

Rogerus de Wytchiriche tenet Sheffeld' de monachis de Nuiun per servicium quadraginta solidorum per annum pro omni servicio, et predicti monachi habuerunt terram illam de dono comitis de Evereus in elemosina.

Abbas de Radinges et monachi tenent burgum de Rading', Tiyelhurste, Pangeburne, Beneham, Chausey, Blebir', Esthanreth', Burghildebir', Thecham, Crockham, et Wytele cum eorum pertinenciis in puram et perpetuam elemosinam.

Priorissa de Kington' et Willelmus Gernon tenent in Westcumpton' decem libratas terre quas Henricus Rex dedit Gileberto de Tyllers, nec facit scutagium.

Abbatissa de Werewelle tenet Estcumpton' in dominico suo de elemosina predecessorum domini regis.

Hugo de Plugeney tenet in Uplamberne terram que fuit Johannis de Gyse, scilicet decem libratas terre et reddit per annum ad scaccarium quadraginta solidos de firma.

Eva de Tracy tenet manerium de Esegareston' cum pertinenciis in dotem de hereditate Hawisie de London', et pertinet ad manerium de Kedwely, pro quo dicta Hawisia tenetur1 servicium quod si dominus rex vel eius capitalis justiciarius venerit in partibus de Kedwely cum exercitu dicta Hawisia debet conducere predictum exercitum cum vexillo suo et tota gente sua per mediam terram de Neth' usque Lagerna.

Galfridus Martel tenet Marteleston' de priore de Nuiun ad feodi firmam, et est de elemosina comitis de Evereus'.

Ricardus de Lucy et Godheud de Sancto Johanne, uxor eius, tenent manerium de Westsipford' de hereditate Roberti de Sancto Johanne, quod est de baronia sua de Basinges, nec facit scutagium.

Robertus de Chadelewurth' in Chadelewurth' quinque hidas terre de abbate de Loco Dei, reddens inde annuatim eidem abbati decem marcas.


[1] Supply ad.

864 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.545-550 - cont.

Idem Robertus in eadem quatuor hidas quas tenet de abbate Abbendonie, reddens ei per annum centum solidos, nec facit scutagium.

Radulfus de Wulvele tenet Wulvele de abbate de Monteburg'.

Priorissa de Ambresbir' tenet Northfalecle in dominico suo de elemosina predecessorum domini regis.

Bartholomeus Pecche tenet Watecumbe in dominico suo de priore de Humle, reddens ei unum denarium per annum pro omni servicio.

Prior de Tifford' tenet Ledecumbe in dominico suo, Chaulawe, Wodhull', de abbate de Cluniaco, reddens ei annuatim centum marcas, et dictus abbas tenet de elemosina.

Abbas de Bello tenet manerium de Brictewalton' in dominico suo de elemosina Willelmi Bastardi.

Robertus de Tatteshale tenet manerium de Shaldeberne in maritagium cum filia Johannis de Grey, et tenetur per seriantiam de falconaria.

Simon de Monte Forti tenet Hungerford' de honore Leycestrie, nec facit scutagium.

Galfridus Ponsard' in eadem unam virgatam terre de domino rege per seriantiam ad hardiland' carnes.

Alanus de Farnham tenet Colecote de priore de Nuiun, reddens per annum quinquaginta solidos, et idem prior tenet de elemosina.

Prior Sancte Fretheswithe Oxonie tenet Eduneton' et Hudden' de elemosina, nec facit scutagium.

Priorissa de Ambresbir' tenet Kenetebir' de elemosina predecessorum domini regis.

Priorissa de Eton' tenet Kenetebir' Eton' de honore Leycestrie in elemosina.

Ricardus de Livinton' et Willelmus Luvel tenent manerium de Benham Livinton' cum pertinenciis per seriantiam de domino rege.

Walterus Marescallus, comes Pembrochie, manerium de Hamsted in dominico suo de marescausia, et non facit scutagium.

Nicholaus Pigun in Eneberne tres hidas terre que sunt elemosina abbatisse de Rumese.

Ricardus de Herterugge tenet Titecumbe per seriantiam de osturcaria.

Magister Milicie Terapli tenet in dominico suo Templeton' de elemosina, nec facit scutagium.

Magister Hospitalis Sancti Johannis Ierosolyme in Brimton' tres hidas terre et dimidiam quas habet de dono Simonia de Ovile, et fuit de feodo Willelmi de Roumare et tenuerunt aliquo tempore pro dimidio feodo et nunc reddunt ad scaccarium x. marcas.

Idem Magister in dominico suo Grenham quod fuit de feodo comitis de Ferrariis et datum in maritagium Radulfo Paynel, et filius eius * *manerium illud dedit fratribus Sancti Johannis, nec facit scutagium.

Simon de Monte Forti et Alienora uxor eius tenent Neubir' in dotem de hereditate Walteri Marescalli, comitis Pembrochie, nec facit scutagium, et fuit de feodo comitis de La Perche.

Prior de Longevill' tenet medietatem de Westhanney de elemosina comitis Marescalli de honore Giffard'.

BERKS. 865

S.ij.23.I.545-550 - cont.

Urrianus de Sancto Petro medietatem de Estgeng' que tenetur de domino rege in capite, nec scitur per quod servicium.

Prior de Walingford' tenet duas partes de Westhanreth' de elemosina data domui Sancti Albani a predecessoribus regis.

Henricus de Batonia tenet terciam partem de eadem de ballio domini regis de terra que fuit Ricardi de Hanreth, tenetur per seriantiam.

Prior de Framton' tenet in Esthanreth septem hidas terre de elemosina Willelmi Bastardi.

Prior de Nuion in eadem x. hidas terre in elemosina comitis de Evereus'.

Johannes de Hanreth' in eadem unam hidam terre de episcopo Saresberiensi per servicium decem solidorum per annum, nec facit scutagium.

Priorissa de Litelemore in eadem unam hidam terre de elemosina domini regis qui nunc est.

Willelmus de Ferrariis, comes de Dereby, villatam de Stanford' in dominico suo de honore de Tuttebir', nec facit scutagium.

Hamo de Crevequer quandam partem villate de Boclande de priore de Nugon, reddens per annum xl.s.

Abbas de Pratellis tenet in Eston' quinque hidas terre quas dicit tenere in elemosina.

Willelmus le Flemeng' tenet Stretie de honore comitis Essexie, nec scitur per quod servicium.

Bertramus de Crioill' tenet Mollesford' ut wardam de ballio domini regis de hereditate filii Eudonis de Karro, nec facit scutagium.

Nicholaus de la Suthbir' in eadem villa unam hidam terre de abbate de Eynesham quam dictus abbas tenet de elemosina.

Prior de Bermondesey tenet medietatem ville de Upton' de elemosina.

Nicholaus de Molis et Radulfus Ursel [1] tenent quandam partem eiusdem ville in dominico suo de baronia que fuit Jacobi de Novo Mercato, nec facit scutagium.

Johannes de Upton' tenet quintam partem eiusdem ville de hereditate uxoris eius de baronia predicta, nec facit scutagium.

Willelmus de Wyndelesor' tenet Westhakeberne in dominico suo que est de baronia sua quam tenet de domino rege in capite, nec facit scutagium.

Abbas et conventus Cirencestrie tenent Esthakeberne in dominico suo de elemosina predecessorum domini regis.

Robertus de Notingeham tenet in Blebir' duas hidas terre de feodo prioris de Nugon qui eas [2] de elemosina comitis de Evereus.

Brictewelle et quedam pars de Harewell' sunt de episcopatu Wyntonie de elemosina euiusdam qui vocabatur Wulwardus.

Abbas de Gleston' tenet in dominico suo Essebir' et Edwyneston' de elemosina predecessorum domini regis, nec facit scutagium de dominico suo.

Prior Sancti Swithuni Wyntonie tenet Wullricheston' in dominico suo de elemosina predecessorum domini regis.


[1] Read Russel.
[2] Supply tenet.

806 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.545-550 - cont.

Walterus de Buckote tenet Buckote de priore de Nugon ad feodi firmam, quam dictus prior tenet de elemosina.

Ricardus filius Elye tenet medietatem de Coleshull' de abbatissa Wyntonie ad feodi firmam, que tenet de elemosina.

Warinus de Munchans' tenet medietatem manerii de Scriveham quod fuit vetus dominieum de comite Marescallo; nescitur per quod servicium.

Abbas de Stanley tenet Wadele in dominico suo et Parvam Wurth' de elemosina predecessorum domini regis.

Magister Hospitalis Sancti Johannis Ierosolyme tenet in Wurth'.

Johannes de Curtenay tenet manerium de Sutton' de dono predecessorum domini regis adeo libere sicut ipsi tenuerunt.

Galfridus de Clifden' et Robertus de Swynebrok tenent in West Wytteham duas hidas terre de abbate de Notele, qui eas tenet de elemosina de honore Giffard'.

Prior de Nugon in Esthanney sex hidas terre de elemosina comitis de Evereus.

Adam Sturmy infra limites manerii de Scriveham terram que fuit Roberti le Fuer de ballio domini regis; nesscitur per quod servicium.

Racrus de Bochamton' in Bochamton' quandam partem terre de domino rege in capite per seriantiam.

Abbas de Bello Loco tenet in dominico suo Cheping Farendon', Parvam Farendon', Cokeswell', Inglesham, Shulfton' et Langeford de dono regis Johannis in elemosina.

Prior de Lantodenay tenet in Berneton' quatuor hydas terre de dono predecessorum domini regis in elemosina.

Egidius Ruffus tenet in Langeford' sex hydas de quadam prebenda Lincolnie ex dono predecessorum domini regis.

Hospitalarii tenent in Magna Farndon' et Parva Wurth' quatuor hydas terre de dono et elemosina Hawisie de Lamvalay de baronia de Bocland'.

Bartholomeus de la Huse tenet in Magna Farndon' duas hydas de domino rege in capite per seriantiam osturcarie.

Episcopus Saresberiensis tenet in dominico Sunninges cum pertinenciis Wokingeham, set nesscitur per quod servicium.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM.

II.151-192.

COMITATUS BED'.

NOMINA VILLARUM ET EAS TENENCIUM UBI NON EST CAPITALIS HONOR IN COMITATU BED'.

Felmeresham. De veteri. Stephanus de Landres et Nicholaus de Peincurt tenent de Ranulfo de Mepertesham, [1] et ipse de Huntingdon' de parte Henrici de Hastinges de dimidio feodo, et ipse de domino rege.


[1] Read Meperteshal.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 867

II.151-192 - cont.

Farnehedes de feodo de Warden'. De veteri. Thomas de la Huse tenet in Farneshedes et Hynewyk' dimidium feodum de Alina Wake, [1] de rege.

Wyminton'. Abbas [2] de Sancto Sansone tenet in eadem dimidium feodum de domino rege.

Bydeham. Seriantia. Willelmus filius Radulfi tenet in eadem unam hydam et dimidiam de Johanne de Burgo in eadem per seriantiam.

Stivinton'. Robertus de Gwynes tenet in eadem et in Parva Wahull' ij. feoda militum de domino rege in capite.

Harewold'. Radulfus Morin tenet ij. feoda de honore Huntindonie de parte Henrici de Hastinges, et ipse de rege.

Karleton'. Johannes de Pabeham tenet in eadem quintam partem unius militis de domino rege.

Turveya. Robertus de Pikeshul' tenet in eadem quintam partem j. militis de domino rege.

Simon de Holewell et Philippus Serviens tenent quartam unius militis de honore de Aubeny de Beuver'.

Radulfus filius Reginaldi in eadem terciam partem unius militis de dicto honore, et ipse de rege.

Pabeham. Templarii tenent in eadem feodum unius militis in custodiam pro herede Gilberti Dabeton' [3] de honore de Penbroc de honore Leycestrie.

Wyninton'. De veteri. Seriantia. Ivo Quarel tenet per seriantiam de domino rege.

Farneshedes. De veteri. Willelmus Hatecrist tenet in eadem unam hydam terre de rege per seriantiam.

Stacheden. De veteri. Robertus de Gyminges tenet terciam partem unius militis de domino rege.

Kadindon'. Prebenda Sancti Pauli Londoniensis pro ij. hidis, nec dat scutagium.

Suthbur'. Rogerus de Suthbur' tenet dimidium feodum unius militis de Roberto de Quency de honore Huntindonie nomine dotis.

Kolesclen' cum Chalvesterne. Ricardus de Bello Campo tenet unam carucatam terre pro iiijta parte unius militis de Willelmo de Ros de honore de Spek'.

Ricardus de Steppinol' in eadem terciam partem unius militis de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Colesden' tenuit de Alina Wak' dimidium feodum unius militis de honore de Buly.

Wildon' de honore de Dovre. Radulfus Ridel et Agnes uxor eius et Elena de Sancto Remigio tenent de domino rege in capite dimidium feodum de dicto honore.

Petrus Tyrel tenet dimidium feodum in eadem de domino rege in capite de dicto honore.

Dene. [4] Alexander de Cheyny tenet feodum j. militis de honore Lincolniensis episcopi.


[1] Supply et ipsa.
[2] Read Radulfus.
[3] Read Dabernon.
[4] This entry is included in a bracket with the two entries following as if it was to be noted De veteri.

868 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

Portenhale. Jordanua filius Ricardi tenet dimidium feodum de episcopo Lincolniensi.

Parva Stocton'. Everardus de Stocton' tenet xxxiiij. partem unius feodi de honore de Betane, et tenetur de rege de veteri, fet episcopus de rege+.

Shelton'. De honore de Chawurches. Henricus de Soleby et Johannes de Croxton' et Radulfus de Sancto Sampsone tenent feodum unius militis de dicto honore et tenetur de rege in capite.

Meleburne. Elemosina regis. Prior Hospitalis Ierosolyme tenet totam villam in capite de domino rege in puram elemosinam.

Cnottinge. De veteri. Johannes Bostard tenet totam villam de comite de Ferrariis pro tercia parte unius militis de honore de Hecham.

Bollehurst. Elemosina regis. De veteri. Abbas de Thomeye tenet totam vdlam de domino rege in capite in puram elemosinam.

Acle. De honore de Beauvier. De veteri. Simon de Borard tenet terciam partem unius militis de dicto honore de Beauvier, et ipse de rege.

Remston'. [1] De honore Huntedonie. Robertus de Quency tenet Remston' [1] in dotem uxoris sue de honore Huntindonie. Henricus de Hastinges et Johannes Baillol, et ipsi de rege.

Houton'. De veteri. Galfridus de Conquest tenet in Houton' de honore Huntedonie, scilicet in Kemyston' unum feodum.

Item in eadem villa abbas Rading' tenet unam hydam in puram elemosinam de honore Leycestrie. De veteri.

Elnestowe. De veteri. Abbatissa de Elnestowe tenet illam villam, Wilhamstede, Maudon' in elemosinam de honore Huntedonie.

Steppingl'. De feodo de Wardon. Willelmus filius Ricardi tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo de Wardon', et Alina Wake de rege.

Everholt cum Middelton' de honore de Abervill'. Willelmus de Upton', Ricardus de Everesholt et Dionisia fifia Radulfi tenent unum feodum de honore de Aubervill'.

Abbas de Woburn' in Hare unum feodum de eodem honore, et ipse de domino rege.

Weston'. Hamo de Crevequer tenet de domino rege in capite Weston'; non potest inquiri quo servicio.

Tutdingedon'. Simon de Muntfort, comes Leycestrie, tenet in dotem uxoris sue, nec est de baronia Marescalli; nec solebat dare scutagium, nec manerium de Luxton'. [2]

Portesgrave de honore de Glouc'. Henricus Blancfront, Willelmus Blancfront tenent unum feodum de dicto honore et respondent Galfrido de Lucy de scutagio.

Twylesworth. De veteri. Johannes de Morteyn tenet de feodo Eustacii de Morteyn unum feodum.

Baddelesdon'. De veteri. Paufinus Peyvere tenet in custodia de Willelmo Talebot pro uno feodo.


[1] Read Kemston.
[2] Read Luyton.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 869

II.151-192 - cont.

Eyton' cum Birchemor', Wibbesnade, Houton'. Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet in capite de domino rege pro uno feodo.

Leython'. Abbatissa de Ponte Eborardi tenet in elemosina de domino rege.

Stanbrugg'. De veteri. Johannes de Gatesden' tenet cum herede Johannis de Gatesden' de domino rege per seriantiam.

Fletwyk' et Craule Husseburn'. De veteri. David de Flitwyk' et Nicholaus de Ayngre [1] tenent pro uno feodo de comite de Alba Mara, et comes de rege.

Stodham. Walterus de Basingh tenet in Stodham dimidium feodum de honore Johannis Marescalli.

Cranefeud'. Sutlindon'. Maneria abbatis de Rameseya, unde Cranefeud' continetx. hidas, Sotlingdon' una cum Postesden', Barton', Parva Holewell', xxvij. hidas, set dicunt quod respondet domino regi pro quatuor militibus pro omnibus terris suis.

Hereford'. [2] Socagium. Matheus de Leygham tenet in eadem v. hydas terre de abbate de Rameseye per servicium unius m. per annum pro omni servicio.

Tamiseford'. Nicholaus de Cernes tenet dimidium feodum de feodo Lincolniensis episcopi.

Potton'. Heredes Nicholai Quatremars tenent dimidium feodum de honore de Huntedon' de feodis Johannis filii Roberti, et ipse de rege.

Potton'. De veteri. Michael Burdet eiusdem honoris tenet quartam partem unius militis.

Potton'. Domina de Sutton' eiusdem honoris tenet quartam partem unius militis de eodem honore.

Sutton'. Domina de Sutton', scilicet Christiana de Furnevall', tenet dimidium feodum de honore de Huntedon'.

Henricus de Costentin tenet dimidium feodum de domino rege in capite et alias dimidium feodum et tredecimam partem.

Wrastlingwrth. De novo. Willelmus de Huntelcumbe tenet dimidium feodum de honore Huntedonie, quasi eschaetam domini regis.

Dutton'. Galfridus Camerarius tenet per seriantiam de Willelmo de Bruere de dono domini regis.

Eddewrth'. Ricardus filius Willelmi tenet quintam partem unius militis de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore de Hengsteworth'. Alia pars ville est de feodo Marescalll que alias scribitur inter feoda Marescalli.

Bicleswade. Episcopus Lincolniensis tenet in Bykeleswade, Stratton', Holma, dimidium feodum de baronia ecclesie sue.

Stratton'. Robertus del Ho tenet feodum militis in eadem de honore Huntedonie de parte Isabelle de Bruys.

Holma. De veteri. Ivo Quarel tenet unam hydam de domino rege per seriantiam.

Wardon'. De veteri. Domina Alina Wak' tenet pro dimidio feodo de domino rege in capite in Wardon' et Eyworth', et subscripti defendunt, Fulco et Robertus.

Drogo et Eustacius de Sutton' tenent unum feodum de honore Ricardi de Lindon'. Respondent in Norhamt'. De veteri.


[1] Read Thyngre.
[2] Read Bereford.

870 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

Fulco de Wardon', scilicet le Moyne, tenet unum quarterium de feodo de Wardon'. De veteri.

Robertus Joce unum quarterium de eodem honore. De veteri. De feodo de Wardon'.

Cherleton' cum Mokehangre. Willelmus Luvel tenet medietatem de honore Leycestrie ubi habetur breve dimidii feodi.

Everardus de Trompeton' aliam medietatem de honore Wintonie dimidii feodi. De nova.

Senescalli Bluham. Henricus de Hastinges tenet v. hydas de libertate Sancti Edmundi et ij. hydas Kenemundewyk de eadem libertate; non solebat dare quia proprium hoc est senescalli.

Meperteshale. Seriantia. Ranullus de Meperteshale tenet x.l. terre in capite de domino rege per seriantiam.

Magna Holewell'. Abbas de Westmonasterio tenet vj. hidas et dimidiam non in dominico set est +scutag' [1] reddendo illi+ per annum ix.m.

Henlawe. De veteri. Willelmus de Kanteloywe unam virgatam ibidem de honore de Eyton' de rege.

Aylricheseye. Abbas de Wautham iij. hydas in capite de domino rege in puram elemosinam.

Warinus de Claydich tenet in eadem de domino rege unam dimidiam hydam terre reddendo inde annuatim domino regi iiijors. Socagium.

COMITATUS BUK'.

Turveston'. De veteri. Umfridus de Scouill' totam villatam pro dimidio feodo de la Sucche.

Shaldeston'. De veteri. Willelmus Beauuel feodum unius militis de honore Henrici de Oylly. Willelmus de Straford feodum unius militis de Willelmo de Cantilupo, nomine dotis sue uxoris de feodo de Oyly in parte de feodo Marescalli.

Doddeford'. De veteri. Abbas de Butlesden' medietatem ville in pura elemosina.

Stowe. De veteri. Abbas de Oseneye tenet villam in elemosinam.

Magna Lekamstede. De veteri. Hugo de Chasteleyn tenet unum feodum de feodo [2] de Say, et ipse de rege.

Parva Lekamstede. Ricardus filius Ricardi tenet de comite Herefordie duas partes unius feodi de feodo de Hereford', et ipse de rege.

Foxcote de feodo de Girund'. Stephanus de Haya tenet unum feodum de feodo de Girunde de Dovre.

Morton'. De veteri. Walterus de Morton' tenet tres partes unius feodi de Garino filio Keroldi, et ipse de domino rege.

Kaveresfeud. De veteri. Willelmus Hay tenet in eadem tres partes unius militis de Warewyk'. [3]

Chetwode. De veteri. Radulfus de Chetwode tenet feodum unius militis de Willelmo de Say, et ipse de rege.

Preston' cum Kouel'. De veteri. Ernaldus Biset tenet dimidium feodum de honore de Chelefeud.


[1] Read socagium.
[2] Supply Willelmi.
[3] Read Warenne.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 871

II.151-192 - cont.

Tingwyk. Est elemosina abbatis de Monte Sancte Katerine de dono regis.

Haselaya. Ricardus Hareng' tenet terciam partem unius militis de Radulfo Hareng', et ipse de Comite Ricardo, et ipse de rege.

Langebur'. Elemosina. Robertus Bostart tenet in eadem de abbate Rading', et ipse de heredibus de Chelefeud dimidium feodum. Alia pars est de feodo Marescalli.

Becchampton'. Warinus filius Geroldi tenet dimidium feodum in capite de domino rege; alia pars est de honore Marescalli.

Langebur'. Domina Alicia de Kenebell' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum de abbate Rading', et ipse de heredibus de Chelefeud.

Radeclive. Radulfus Hareng' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de feodo Johannis de Bruxy [1] de heredibus Stephani Fretewell', et ipsi de Comite Ricardo, et ipse de domino rege.

Westbur'. Idem Radulfus tenet villam de Westbur' pro uno feodo de dicto Comite Ricardo, et ipse de domino rege.

Thorington'. Idem Radulfus tenet Thorington' de dicto Comite Ricardo per socagium pro ij.s. per annum.

Thorneberge. Rogerus de Amary tenet dimidium feodum de com' Warewyki. Alia pars est de feodo Willelmi filii Hamonis.

Adestoke. Willelmus Basset tenet in eadem dimidium feodum de honore Peverel de Notingham de Roberto Basset.

Robertus Vernon tenet de eodem feodo in eadem dimidium feodum de Ricardo de Vernon.

Aditon'. Petrus Carbonel tenet, in eadem dimidium feodum de Johanne filio Galfridi de honore de Querdon', et ipse de comite Herefordie, et ipse de rege.

Hildesdon'. Abbas de Nuttele tenet terciam partem unius militis de honore de Berckamstede. Alia pars est de feodo Marescalli.

Twyford. De novo. Walterus Marescallus tenet de dono domini regis, nec potest inquiri de scutagio, et habet breve.

Stepelcleydon'. Johannes filius Galfridi tenet cum [2] Cleydon', nec jurati sciverunt dicere quo jure nec quo servicio, set fuit dominicum regis, ut dicunt.

[3] Simon Borehard tenet iij. partes unius militis in eadem et in Newenton' de feodo de Aubeny de rege. De veteri.

Johannes le Botiler tenet in eadem quartam partem j. militis de Henrico de Hastinges. De veteri.

Umfridus Videlu tenet vj. virgatas terre de honore de Alinton' [4] in capite, et sic de rege. De veteri.

Simon de Olneya et Bartholomeus de Elmetewell' tenent in Clifton' de comite de Arundel et defendunt pro quarta parte unius militis, et comes de domino rege.

Emberton'. De veteri. Nicholaus filius Willelmi tenet unum feodum de honore Paynel, et ipse de rege.

Emberton'. De veteri. Robertus de la Bataille tenet dimidium feodum de honore Huntedonie comitis Arundell', et ipse de rege.


[1] Read le Brun.
[2] Read in.
[3] Supply Clifton.
[4] Read Abinton.

872 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

Pottesho. De veteri. Radulfus de Kameys tenet dimidium feodum de honore de Huntedon' de parte Henrici de Hastinges.

Haremade. De veteri. Sarra de Bending' tenet unum feodum in Haremade de feodo Willelmi de Windesore.

Shyrington'. Johannes de Karon tenet de domino rege in capite ij. feoda, de quibus Robertus de Cocfeud tenet unum feodum.

Craulee. Robertus de Meysy tenet quartam partem unius militis de honore Huntedonie de parte Henrici de Hastinges.

Brousthon'. Radulfus Pincerna tenet quartam partem j. feodi de feodo Huntedonie de parte Henrici de Hastinges. Alia pars est de feodo Marescalli.

Middelton'. Lucas de Kaynges tenet in eadem duas partes unius militis in capite de domino rege.

Wavendon'. Gilbertus Passelewe tenet unum feodum in eadem de honore de Clare.

Bollebrichull'. Robertus le Cauceys tenet unum feodum in eadem de feodo Marescalli.

Wavendon'. Paullnus Peyvere tenet unum feodum exceptis duabus virgatis terre de feodo de Berkamstede.

De feodo de Wahull'. Abbas de Woburn' et Gilbertus Passelewe de Wavendon' tenent quartam partem unius feodi de honore de Wahull'.

Magna Brichull'. De feodo comitis Arundell'. Domina comitissa de Warwyk tenet de comite de Arundell' pro ij. feodis.

Walterus de Bray de eadem tenet quartam partem j. feodi de honore de Walinford'.

Parva Brichull'. Johannes de Gatesden' tenet in eadem unum feodum de feodo Stephani de Turnham.

Blechelee. Johannes de Gray tenet quartam partem unius feodi de comite Wintonie.

Eton'. Seriantia. Idem Johannes de Gray tenet per seriantiam de domino rege.

Woketon'. Hugo de Verly tenet in eadem unum feodum de comite de Arundell', et habet breve.

Woketon'. Hugo filius Walteri de eadem unum feodum cum una hyda terre in Weston' de honore de Berckamstede.

Shenlee. De veteri, Thomas le Mansel unum feodum de comite de Arundell'.

Luchton'. De veteri. Nicholas le Faukoner xx. partem unius feodi in Berkamstede.

Bradeuell' per R. de Sumery. De veteri. Willelmus de Beause tenet in eadem unum feodum de honore Walingfordie.

Johannes filius Nicholai tenet viij. partem de feodo Paynel. De veteri.

Stanton'. De veteri. Petrus Barre tenet in eadem unum feodum de honore Walingfordie.

Wilie. Elemosina. De veteri. Abbas de Lavenden tenet vj. partem unius militis de parvo feodo de Morteyn; comitis Albemarlie.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 873

II.151-192 - cont.

Magna Linford. De veteri. Radulfus Marescallus unum feodum de honore de Berckamstede. Alia pars est de feodo Marescalli.

Lavenden'. De veteri. Johannes de Sancto Medardo tenet in eadem duas partes de dimidio feodo de honore Huntedonie de parte comitis [de] Auba Mara.

Lavenden. De veteri. Lucas de Colum et Milo de Bello Campo, Radulfus filius Johannis, tenent dimidium feodum de honore de Bydon et Chawrch.

Braufeud. De veteri. Robertus Leyr, Robertus de Abinton' Umfridus Trice, tenent iij. virgatas et dimidiam et unum quarterium de honore Huntedonie; respondent Radulfo Morin de parte Henrici de Hastinges.

Weston'. Amaricus de Nodariis tenet dimidium feodum de feodo de Chawrches.

Weston'. Robertus Curtstalur dimidium feodum de eodem honore.

Weston'. Simon de Raveneston' tenet in eadem terciam partem de dimidio feodo de parte comitis de Alba Mara.

Gahurst. De veteri. Amaricus de Nodariis tenet in eadem unum feodum de feodo Willelmi de Say.

Latebur'. De veteri. Ricardus de Gatesden tenet quartam partem unius militis de feodo de Chawrches.

Haveresham. De veteri. Nicholaus de Haveresham cum suis tenentibus tenet unum feodum de honore Peverel.

Fillegrave. De veteri. Willelmus de Shiryngton' tenet dimidium feodum de feodo de Chawrches.

Olneya. Comes de Arundell' tenet Olneyam de dono domini regia ex antiquo, nec scitur scutagium.

Stokes. Petrus de Goldinton' tenet dimidium feodum de honore Peverel.

Iocle. Waleramua de Mortimer tenet in eadem sextam partem unius militis de eodem honore.

Hamslap'. De veteri. Willelmus Mauduit unum feodum de domino rege in capite.

Hamslap'. De veteri. Robertus de Totehale unum feodum de eodem honore.

Hamslap'. De veteri. Henricus de Beause unum quarterium de eodem honore.

Hamslap'. De veteri. Robertus le Lu tenet in eadem unum quarterium.

Hamslap'. De veteri. Willelmus de Medburn' in eadem unum quarterium'.

Hamslap'. De veteri. Radulfus de Chenie unum quarterium de eodem honore.

Hamslap'. De novo. Willelmus Lupus unum quarterium in eadem de dicto honore.

Hamslap'. De novo. Walterus de Totehale unum quarterium de dicto honore.

Hamslap'. De novo. Petrus Blundus tenet in eadem unum quarterium de dicto honore.

874 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

Hamslap'. De novo. Robertus de Bello Augney xx; partem unius feodi.

Hamslap'. De novo. Thomas Basset lx. partem unius feodi de dicto honore.

Lutegereshal. Walterus de Lutegareshal tenet duas hydas de Johanne de Gray per seriantiam. Alia pars est de honore Gloucestrie.

Grendon'. Radulfus de Sancto Amando tenet duas hydas terre de eschaeta Normannorum in eadem, quas habuit de R. Comite, et ipse de domino rege.

Togwike. Hospitalarii. Henricus de Scaccario tenet unam hydam de feodo Hospitalariorum. Henricus de Scaccario tenet illam de Hospitalariis.

Doddreshull'. De veteri. Rogerus de Craneford tenet dimidium feodum de Waltero de Clifford de feodo +Buk'.+

Heggeshawe. De veteri. Hospitelarii tenent in elemosina

Fullebroc. De veteri. Rogerus de Wimbervill' tenet in eadem de Galfrido de Lucy pro dimidio feodo.

Elemosina. Idem Rogerus tenet ij. hydas de abbate de Eynesham in puram elemosinam ipsius abbatis.

Quendon' cum Dumdon'. Rogerus de Wymberhull' et Willelmus Cerveise tenent duas partes unius militis de honore Wallngfordie et tenent terciam partem de feodo Hospitalariorum.

Winchedon'. Prior Sancte Fredeswythe in puram elemosinam domini regis.

Esses. Johannes de Esses tenet de feodo de Bekelee et domini Comitis Ricardi.

Wormehal'. Thomas filius Galfridi, Willelmus filius Elys tenent feodum unius militis de feodo Gloucestrie. Comes Ricardus recipit ut dicitur.

Thomas de Icford tenet iiij. hidas et dimidiam de feodo abbatis de Gresteyn, quod quidem abbas tenet in elemosinam.

Kingesheye. Willelmus de Bolebek' tenet unum feodum de domino rege.

Hilmere cum Eston'. Himbertus Pugensis tenet per seriantiam de domino rege.

Brehull' cum Burstall'. Dominicum domini regis excepta una hyda quam Johannes filius Nigelli tenet in villa de Borstal] per seriantiam.

Elemosina. Fratres de +Huntingfeud+ tenent de feodo de Bruhull' in Lutegereshal iij. hydas in puram elemosinam.

Botteclaydon'. Rogerus de Wimbervill tenet dimidium feodum, et Thomas de Waloines ij. hydas de Walinford'.

Item in eadem. Thomas tenet quintam partem in eadem de honore de Querendon' de feodo comitis Herefordie.

Seriantia. Radulfus filius Radulfi de Querendon' tenet iij. hidas et unam virgatam per seriantiam de feodo Peverel'.

Middelcleydon'. De veteri. Hugo filius Radulfi tenet duo feoda de honore Peverel de Notingham.

Parva Merstort'. De veteri. Johannes filius Galfridi tenet Parvam Merston' et Queredon' de comite Herefordie, et ipse de rege.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 875

II.151-192 - cont.

Grenebur'. De veteri. Abbas de Sancto Albano tenet in puram elemosinam.

Bledelawe. Elemosina. Abbas del Bek' Herlewyne tenet in elemosinam de feodo Hugonis de Gurnay.

Simon Druel tenet parvum feodum de Mortum de Ricardo de Kayngnes.

Horsendon'. De veteri. Johannes de Braybroc tenet duas partes unius feodi de Roberto de Cogfeud de parvo feodo de Morteyn.

Magna Riselbur'. De veteri. Willelmus de Symili tenet pro uno feodo de domino rege in capite.

Parva Riselbur'. De veteri. Prior de Cantebur' tenet in elemosinam de domino rege.

Balliva Cantuarie. Baudewinus de Wulneswyk et Bartholomeus de la Ponde tenent in eadem tres partes unius feodi de domino archiepiscopo.

Hadenham. De veteri. Prior de Roucestre tenet Hadenham in elemosinam de domino rege.

Hadenham. De veteri. Galfridus filius Ricardi tenet tres partes feodi de episcopo Roucestr'.

Hadenham. De veteri. Adam de Spaldington' tenet in eadem quartam partem unius feodi de dicto episcopo.

Hadenham. Johannes filius Milonis tenet quandam terram de dicto episcopo, ita quod, quando scutagium currit dat1 xl.s., idem Johannes dabit xl.d. et sic ad plus plus et ad minus minus.

Stanes. De veteri. Gilbertus de Bracy tenet septem partes feodi unius militis de Thoma de Line' de honore de Beuver.

Willelmus de Sancto Claro, Willelmus de la Merse et Willelmus Blackstan tenent feodum unius militis de Johanne de Sancto Claro, de honore de Suanneskamp'. De veteri.

Willelmus de Cnovill [Clovill'] tenet dimidium feodum de Warino de Monte Chanesy. De veteri.

Upton'. Abbas de Osneye et Willelmus filius Ricardi tenent unum feodum de Henrico Huse de honore de Notingham.

Item Galfridus filius Willelmi tenet ibidem xx. partem unius militis de honore de Walingford'.

Magna Kenevella. De honore comitis Marescalli et feodo Marescalli. [2]

Parva Kenevella. Umfridus le Dun tenet dimidium feodum de Radulfo Russel de feodo et herede de Wyk'.

Parva Kenevella. Alicia de Bolebek tenet dimidium feodum unius militis de Umfrido le Dun et de feodo de Herdwyk'.

Eselbur'. De veteri. Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet dimidium feodum de Willelmo filio Gardonis [3] et de honore de Haddeleye [3].

Stokes. Galfridus de Mandevill' tenet villam nomine dotis uxoris sue pro uno feodo de feodo episcopi Lincolniensis.

Stokes. Willelmus filius Rogeri tenet unum feodum in eadem de dicto honore.

Hertwell'. Willelmus de Hertwell' tenet unum feodum in capite de domino rege de honore de Notingham.


[1] Read ad.
[2] This is written as if it were a title.
[3] Read Guidonis, and Duddeleye.

876 A.D. 1242-1243

II.151-192 - cont.

Aylesbir'. Johannes funis Galfridi tenet manerium de Aylesbir' cum pertinenciis suis de domino rege per servicium lx.l. et per servicium unius militis.

Huchkote. Willelmus de Houchkote tenet manerium de Huberto de Burgo de honore de Wormegay in socagio pro vj.s. annuatim reddendis.

Brouthon'. Abbas de Messenden' tenet ad firmam de abbate del Bek' de elemosina pro vj.m. annuatim reddendis.

Boclande. De veteri. Heres +filii+ Johannis de Veteri Ponte tenet feodum unius militis de baronia episcopi Lincolniensis.

Boclande. De veteri. Domina Johanna de Mumby tenet feodum unius militis de dicta baronia.

Aston' +et+ Clinton'. Seriantia. De veteri. Nicia de Clinton' tenet manerium de Eston' de domino rege in capite per seriantiam.

Aston' +et+ Clinton'. Reginaldus de Chetindon' tenet in eadem quartam partem unius feodi de eodem feodo.

Weston'. De veteri. Rogerus de Craft tenet feodum unius militis de comite Leycestrie.

Weston'. De veteri. Simon de Turvill' tenet in eadem feodum unius militis de dicto comite.

Weston'. De veteri. Rogerus de la Hyde tenet dimidium feodum de dicto honore.

Weston'. De veteri. Heredes Willelmi Malet tenent dimidium feodum de predicto honore.

Halton'. Elemosina. De veteri. Prior de Cantuaria tenet illam in elemosinam de antecessoribus domini regis.

Wendour. De veteri. Willelmus de Feyngnes tenet manerium de domino rege in escambio pro custodia castri de Dovre.

Wendour. Judlemus de Evermia tenet dimidium feodum unius militis in eadem vllla de heredibus Hugonis de Gurnay de feodo de Wendour.

Wendour. Domina Johanna de Mumby tenet dimidium feodum de heredibus Hugonis de Gurnay de predicto honore.

Kingeshull'. De veteri. Ingeramus de Betun tenet unum feodum de feodo de Wendeure, et ipse de domino rege.

Hamden'. De veteri. Alexander de Hamden' tenet feodum unius militis de honore de Duddelee, et ipse de rege.

Parva Messenden'. De veteri. Walterus Mantel tenet unam dimidiam hydam terre per seriantiam de domino rege. Alia pars est de honore comitis Oxonie.

Holemere. Comes de Saresberia tenet dimidium feodum de baronia Lincolnie.

Duninton'. De veteri. Warinus de Monte Chanesy tenet manerium de Duninton' de antiqua tenura de dono domini regis, nec dat scutagium, ut inquisicio dicit ad presens.

Edelesbur'. Willelmus Russel tenet dimidium feodum de domino rege in capite de honore de Morteyn.

Socagium. Heredes Radulfi Muschet tenent vj. virgatas terre per socagium de dicto Willelmo per xxxij.s. per annum.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 877

II.151-192 - cont.

De eadem. Milo de Bello Campo tenet in capite de domino rege quartam partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Socagium. De veteri. Hugo filius Nicholai tenet de predicto Milone vij. virgatas terre in socagio pro xiiij.s.

Socagium. De veteri. Ricardus filius Agnetia tenet unam virgatam terre pro vj.s. per annum de dicto Willelmo Russel.

Item Edelesbur'. Nicholaus filius Bernardi tenet quartam partem unius militis de honore de Moritun' cum suis tenentibus et sic de rege.

Item in eadem. Nicholaus Spigurnel tenet in capite de domino rege xxxij. solidatas terre pro una libra cimini una cum tenentibus suis.

Domina abbatissa de Berkinkes tenet in elemosina domini regis * * [1] et Litlington. [2]

Similiter de honore Wyntonie [3] Morton', similiter Iwingho et Westwicumbe, et sunt in manu domini regis.

Pikelesthorn'. De honore Walingfordie in parte. Alia pars de feodo Marescalli.

Drayton'. Gilbertus de Greynvill' tenet terciam partem unius militis de Berkamsted.

Messewrth de rege. Totum de honore Walingfordie.

Chetindon'. Radulfus de Cheynduit tenet unum feodum excepta parte Wal'.

Solesbur'. Walterus Mansel tenet unum feodum de honore de Baddel'. [4]

Solesbur'. Galfridus de Lucy tenet unam hydam de honore Gloucestrie.

Solesbur'. Henricus de Auvers de Walinf' unam hydam.

Abbas de Woburn habet puram elemosinam.

Hentemor'. [5] Henricus de Naffort, Radulfus le Poer, ij. feoda de feodo Cestrie per escambium, et respondent Willelmo de Cantilupo.

Crofton. Willelmus de Aguilon dimidium feodum de feodo Willelmi de Say, et ipse de rege.

Kereslowe. De veteri. Robertus de Oggesham et Galfridus filius Johannis tenent unum feodum de honore de Salesburia, et ipse de rege.

Herdwyk'. Radulfus Russel et Nicholaus de Mules tenent unum feodum in Herdwik', set Umfridus de Dun* *illos de ij.s.

Bridelesthon'. Adam de Welton' tenet de honore de Mortuyn sextam partem militis. Alia pars est de honore Walingfordie.

Ralesham cum Wengrave. Gilbertus de Broute tenet unum feodum et dimidium de feodo de Beton. Alia pars est de honore de Walingford'.


[1] Supply Slapton. The text is imperfect and confused.
[2] Lidlington, co. Bedford.
[3] Ivingho, Morton and West Wycombe were held by the Bishop of Winchester.
[4] Read Duddel.
[5] Read Mentemore.

878 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

Aston. Elemosina. De veteri. Abbas de Sancto Albano tenet in elemosinam.

Wengrave. De veteri. Willelmus Talebot tenet unum feodum de honore comitis de Warenna.

Wengrave. De veteri. Rogerus de Wymbervill' tenet unum feodum de Galfrido de Lucy.

Dodinton'. Robertus Passelewe tenet unum feodum militis de honore de Dovre.

Wineslawe cum pertinenciis. Abbas de Sancto Albano tenet in liberam elemosinam.

Waddon'. De dominico domini regis Johannes filius Galfridi modo feoffatus est, nec dat scutagium.

+Shereleye+. Johanna de Nowers terciamdecimam partem j. feodi de honore de Bemfeud.

Toterhe. Paufinus Peyvre tenet de feodo Willelmi de Cantilupo.

Mureske. Warinus filius Geroldi dimidium feodum in capite de domino rege.

Mureske. Preterea j. hidam in Mur' Radulfus le Poer. Robertus de Hyda tenent de feodo de Bernero de honore de* *.

Drayton'. Abbas de Wobum tenet terciam partem unius militis de feodo Petri de Newinton'.

In Stivegl' feoda ij. militum, primum de honore Walingfordie et reliquum de feodo Gloucestrie; Warinus tenet.

Swaneburne Superior. Est de feodo Marescalli.

Swaneburne Inferior. Abbas de Woburne tenet iiij. hidas et dimidiam de domino rege que fuerunt date in escambio H. de Clinton' pro castello de Kenilwurth', nec sciunt dicere de scutagio.

Preterea Ricardus Godart tenet dimidium feodum de honore de Berkamstede.

Robertus Passelewe vj. virgatas de eodem honore, et dictus Robertus tenet ij. hidas que pertinent ad Querendon' de feodo comitis Herefordie.

Horton'. De veteri. Willelmus de Windeshore tenet medietatem ville de Horton' in capite de domino rege, et pertinet ad medietatem baronie sue de Wyndeshore quam defendit per wardam, scilicet per xl. dies pro* *castri de Windeshore, xvj.a. viij.d.

Horton'. De veteri. Preterea infra illam medietatem ville de Horton' Adam de Horton' tenet de dicto Willelmo quartam partem unius feodi.

Horton'. De veteri. Aliam vero medietatem ville de Horton' prenominatus Willelmus tenet de domino Hugone de Hodeng' et Thoma de Lacell', reddendo eis annuatim unum par calcariorum deauratorum.

Langel'. Dominus Ricardus de Munfichet tenet Langele cum Waredesbur' in capite de domino rege pertinentes ad baroniam suam de Stanstede in comitatu Essex, nec inde facit militare servicium.

Dachet. Dominus Henricus de Pynkeny tenet Dachet et Folemere in capite de domino rege pro uno feodo et reddit scutagium. In illo vero feodo Andreas filius Johannis de Windeshore tenet de dicto Henrico de novo assarto vj. partem unius feodi.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 879

II.151-192 - cont.

Wexham. Henricus Mansel tenet Wexham de herede Hugonis Hodeng' pro uno feodo, et ipse de rege.

Eton'. Villa de Eton', medietas Thome de Lacell' et altera medietas Radulfi de Hodeng', quam tenent in capite de domino rege et defendunt illam per wardam ad castrum de Windeshore simul cum aliis maneriis suis que tenent de domino rege in capite de medietate baronie de Windeshor', scilicet per xl. dies xvj.s. viij.d.

Huchele. Socagium. Johannes filius Ricardi tenet eandem de domina Alicia de Lanvelay per socagium.

Stok'. Ricardus de Stok' tenent una cum tenentibus suis de honore de Duddel' pro iij. feodis quod alias scribitur.

Evre. De honore Walingfordie.

Denham. Abbas Westmonasterii. Dominus Henricus de Capella et Walterus Burdet tenent Denham de abbate de Westmonasterio in feodi firma.

Comitissa Oxonie tenet in capite de domino rege medietatem ville* *de baronia aua, aet non reddit scutagium de dominico suo.

Deficit [1]

Ibbesteghurst. Radulfus de Cheindeduit tenet pro dimidio feodo de comite Warewiki excepta quinta parte quod est in comitatu Oxonie.

Magna Merlawe. De veteri. Est de honore Glouceatrie, set Comes Ricardus tenet in manu sua, nec dat inde domino regi scutagium.

Parva Merlawe. De veteri. Est de honore Wallngfordie, excepta una dimidia virgata terre de feodo Marescalll et Hameleden'.

Woburn'. De veteri. Dominus Aluterus [2] de Eincurt tenet duas partes de Woburn' de episcopo Lincolniensi pro ij. feodis, unde Ricardus de la Stok, Ren' de la Lude dimidium feodum in eadem.

Woburn'. Johannes de Glorie dimidium feodum de eodem. De veteri.

Woburn'. Willelmus piscator, Johannes de Elmeden', Thomas de Steinbr' dimidium feodum. De veteri.

Woburn'. Heredes Radulfi de Medburn' tenent dimidum feodi. De veteri.

Beddesbur'. [3] De honore Walingfordie.

Wycumbe. De honore Walingfordie.

Westwycumbe. Est dominieum episcopi Wintoniensis, nec dat scutagium.

Bradenham. Bradenham est dominieum com' Warwiki et tenet illam de comite Herefordie per socagium.

Radendale. [4] Templarii et abbatissa de Fonte Eboraldi tenent in elemosina.


[1] A whole page of the MS. is here left blank. It is clear that for some distance at this point the scribe was unable to read his original. The following portion of the text is probably corrupt and incomplete.
[2] Read Oliverus.
[3] Read Heddeshur'.
[4] Read Radenache.

880 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

Santerdon'. Medietas ville de honore Walngfordie. Osbertus de Santerdon' tenet alteram medietatem pro uno feodo cum vicesima parte unius feodi. Vill' de Penna et idem Osbertus tenent de Simone de Turevill' de feodo Leycestrie.

Libertas W. Marescalll.

Walterus Marescallus, comes de Penbrok', habet ibidem capitalem honorem, scificet honorem Giffard'; caput illius honoris est Crendon', et tenet de domino rege.

Nomina villatarum illius honoris, scilicet Crendon', et eas tenendum et per que servicia.

Crendon'. Dominus Comes tenet in dominicum, excepto quod Johannes Morel tenet de eo quartam partem unius feodi de veteri feoffamento.

Essendon'. De veteri. Henricus de Sancto Andrea unum feodum in dominico de eodem honore.

Palikote. De veteri. Thomas Buketot dimidium feodum de Fulcone de Coudray, et Fulco de dicto honore de veteri.

Adgrave. De veteri. Johannes Morel unum feodum de comitissa Oxonie, et illa de dicto honore.

Mullesho. De veteri. Fulco de Coudray unum feodum in dominico de dicto honore.

Walton'. De veteri. Robertus del Hoo habet wardam ubi sunt tria feoda de dicto honore.

Pichelesthorn'. De veteri. Oliverus de Asprevill' tenet unum feodum de dicto honore.

Wulsiston'. De veteri. Hugo de Chislampton' tenet dimidium feodum de dicto honore.

Gamelton'. De veteri. Warinus filius Keroldi tenet dimidium feodum de dicto honore in dominico.

Chikesond. De veteri. Prior de Chikesond habet wardam de dimidio feodo de dicto honore.

Messenden'. De veteri. Johanna de Sanford unum feodum in dominico de dicto honore.

Morton'. De veteri. Willelmus filius Reginaldi et Elys Droeys unum feodum in dominico de dicta Johanna, et illa de dicto honore.

Falleg'. De veteri. Bartholomeus de Sakevill' unum feodum in dominico in capite de dicto honore.

Singelbur'. De veteri. Galfridus de Sancto Martino unum feodum in Sengelbur' et Parva Merlawe, quia [1] priorissa tenet de eo dicto honore.

Esington'. De veteri. Idem Galfridus tenet unum feodum in Esington' in dominico de dicto honore.

Chilton'. De veteri. Robertus de Greynvill urium feodum in Chilton' in dominico de dicto honore.


[1] Read quod.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 881

II.151-192 - cont.

Chilton'. De veteri. Hamo de Sancta Fide dimidium feodum in Chilton' in dominico de dicto honore.

Borton'. [1] De veteri. Robertus de Bello Campo et Sibilla de Hermingeham [2] unum feodum in dominico de dicto honore.

Wotton'. De veteri. Eustac' de Greinvill' et Robertus de la Rokele tenent ij. feoda in Wotton' in dominico de dicto honore.

Cherdesleg'. De veteri. Hugo de Cressy unum feodum in Cherdesl' in dominico de dicto honore.

Polekote Cressy. De veteri. Idem Hugo tenet unum feodum in eadem in dominico de dicto honore.

Bradeuell'. De veteri. Petrus Barre tenet dimidium feodum de Alexandra de Redham, et ipse de comite de dicto honore.

Hachekote. De veteri. Willelmus de Engelleud unum feodum in dominico de dicto honore.

Johannes [3] de Columbariis tenet dimidium feodum in Cherdesleg' de comite in capite de dicto honore.

Winchedon' Inferior, Abbacia de Nuttele, Newenton', Acle sunt libera elemosina domini comitis et sunt de dicto honore.

Harewode similiter, excepta quarta parte unius militis quam Bernardus de Harewrode tenet de dicto honore.

Robertus filius Willelmi Revel [4] de Crendon' qui est in custodia domini comitis tenet c. solidatas terre per servicium unius capelle de rosis ad Natale, nec dat scutagium et est de novo feoffatus.

Item sunt plures liberi tenentes apud Crendon' qui debent ire per preceptum domini comitis ubi jusserit in exercitu, et sic defendunt terram suam.

Breve per Marescallum. Item comitissa Oxonie tenet de dicto honore x. feoda, set in diversis comitatibus; in comitatu Buk' tenet subscripta:-

Witcherche. De veteri. Comitissa unum feodum in dominico in comitatu Buk', et subscripta similiter.

Kenebell'. De veteri. Emma et Matillis tenent de comitissa, et illa de comite in capite, scilicet tria feoda.

Magna Linford'. De veteri. Radulfus filius Radulfi modo tenet unum feodum de comitissa, et illa de comite.

Bechampton'. De veteri. Willelmus de Bechampton' tenet unum feodum de dicta comitissa.

Lingeston'. De veteri. Henricus Dayrel unum feodum de dicta comitissa, et illa de dicto comite.

Adigrave. De veteri. Johannes Morel unum feodum in dominico de dicta comitissa, et illa de comite.


[1] Read Dorton.
[2] Read Bermingeham.
[3] There is no note De veteri against this entry, but the omission is probably accidental.
[4] This name was originally written Crevel, but the C was subsequently erased.

882 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

Lekamsted'. De veteri. Ricardus filius Ricardi dimidium feodum in dominico de dicta comitissa, et illa de comite.

Langeport. De veteri. Johannes Moriz dimidium feodum in dominico de dicta comitissa, et illa de comite.

Burthon'. De veteri. Fulco de Burthon' tenet dimidium feodum de dicta comitissa, et illa de comite.

Feoda comitis Marescalli in comitatu Bedfordie.

Rogerus Burnard tenet iiijor feoda in Ailriches', in Eddewurth' et Everton' una cum tenentibus suis.

Item feoda comitisse Oxonie, que tenet de domino rege in capite in comitatu Buk', ubi nullum breve.

Kalverton'. Johannes de Kalverton' tenet unum feodum in Kalverton' in comitatu Buk'.

Walterus de Hintes tenet unum feodum in comitatu Buk'.

Parva Messenden'. Johanna la Botilere tenet dimidium feodum in Parva Messenden' de comitatu Buk'.

Wavendon'. Domina comitissa Oxonie tenet unum quarterium in Wavendon' in comitatu Buk'.

Abbas de Woburn' tenet terciam partem unius militis in Chetindon' et Waddon' in comitatu Buk'.

Notandum quod ista feoda calumpniantur Comiti Ricardo per dotem uxoris sue, et non computantur inter* *per brevia.

Feoda comitisse Oxonie que tenet de comite de Clare in comitatu Buk', et comes recipit inde scutagium.

In Hillesdon'. Dimidium feodum de comite de Clare. Comes Ricardus recipit scutagium.

In Langeport. Dimidium feodum de eodem tenemento. Comes Ricardus recipit scutagium.

In Braston'. Unum feodum Robertus de Brouton' tenet. Comes Ricardus recipit scutagium.

In Craulee. Unum feodum de eodem tenemento. Comes recepit.

In Wroxhull'. Unum feodum de eodem tenemento Philippus tenet. Comes Ricardus recipit scutagium.

In Raveneston'. Unum feodum de eodem tenemento Hugo de Albo Monasterio, Henricus de Botteby tenent. Comes Ricardus recipit scutagium.

Libertas Comitis Ricardi.

Feoda et nomina villatarum domini Comitis Ricardi in comitatu Buk', qui quidem comes nullum patitur vicecomitem habere ingressum in libertate sua ad faciendam inquisicionem de feodis, dicens se tenere honorem Walingfordie pro tribus militibus.

Nomina villarum. Woketon'. Hugo de +Verly+ tenet dimidium Sobinton'. feodum de dicto honore.

Acle. Essenden' ij. hide, Walterus Bernard' tenet.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 883

II.151-192 - cont.

Wottesdon'. Cherdesleg'. Dimidium feodum, Walterus filius Johannis tenet de dicto honore.

Bichendon'. Higford. Medietas. Thomas de Appelton' tenet.

Ethrop'. Ocle. Medietas. Willelmus filius El'.

Fletemerston'. Grundewell'. Clopham de honore Walingfordie. Westcote. Pichecote. Ricardus Vernon de eodem honore.

Quenton'. Warmodeston'. Shalden'. Willelmus de Blakeuell' ij. partes unius militis de Berkhamstr'.

Claynd'. Sonningdon'. Comes Ricardus tenet in villa de Sonningdon' x. hidas de honore Marescalli.

Claydon. Thomas de Waloines. Basilia de Bervill' tenet in Stradlee ij. hidas de eodem honore.

Lega. Johannes de Gray et plures alii terciam partem unius feodi de Walingford'.

Baronia de Wlrington' in comitatu Buk'.

Wulrington'. De veteri. De domino rege. Willelmus filius Hamonis tenet duo feoda in dominico.

Lusthon'. De veteri. De domino rege. Galfridus de Luston' tenet unum feodum in dominico de dicto honore.

Stokes Hamund'. De veteri. De domino rege. Willelmus filius Hamonis unum feudum in dominico.

Thornberge. De veteri. De domino rege. Reginaldus de Fraxino tenet unum feodum de dicto honore.

Padebur'. De veteri. De domino rege. Willelmus filius Hamonis et Willelmus de Echinkeham unum feodum de dicto honore.

Aston' Sanford'. De veteri. De domino rege. Nicholaus de Sanford unum feodum in dominico de dicto honore.

Langeport. De veteri. De domino rege. Radulfus de Langeport dimidium feodum in dominico de dicto honore.

Chaufonte Sancti Egidii. Domina Agatha Trussebut tenet in dotem pro ij. feodis et dimidio, unde ipsa tenet dimidium feodum in dominico. Alexander filius Hamonis et Warinus Polet tenent duo feoda.

Drayton'. Willelmus de Bello Campo unum feodum de dicto honore.

Shiveneston'. Galfridus de Kauz tenet in eadem unum feodum de dicto honore. De veteri. De domino rege.

Eselbur'. Alanus de Maydenuell' de eodem unum quarterium.

Eselbur'. Henricus de Scaecario de eodem unum quarterium.

Libertas de Doddelee.

Honor de Doddelee in comitatu Buk'.

Nomina villatarum et eas tenencium et per que servicia de domino rege.

Neuport. Willelmus de Bello Campo Bed' tenet in dominico nomine dotis uxoris sue, excepto quod Johannes de Lavente tenet quartam partem unius militis in eadem.

884 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

Neuport. Deudone de Kaldecote tenet quartam partem unius militis.

Neuport. De veteri. Johannes Grim in eadem et in Wulsiston' dimidium feodum.

Chechel'. De veteri. Prior de Tigford tenet unum feodum de eodem honore.

Hoggeston'. De veteri. Domina Amicia de Brian tenet feodum unius militis de eodem honore cum una hyda de Kerslawe.

Parva Craulee. De novo feoffamento. Galfridus de Bello Campo tenet dimidium feodum.

Astwode. De novo feoffamento. Robertus de la Rokele dimidium feodum de eodem honore.

Eselbur'. Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet dimidium feodum in Eselbur' de dicto honore.

Alexander de Hamden unum feodum de eodem.

Emberton'. De veteri. Nicholaus de Emberton' tenet unum feodum de eodem honore.

Tyringeham. De veteri. Giffardus tenet unum feodum de eodem honore.

Parva Linford'. De veteri. De eodem honore; reddit iiij.s. per annum; Henricus de Hautvill' tenet de eodem honore.

Stokes, Dutton'. De veteri. Ricardus de Stokes tenet ij. feoda in dominico et tenentes sui unum feodum.

Bradeuell'. De veteri. Johannes filius Nicholai tenet viij. partem unius militis de eodem feodo.

Ovinge, Merse. De veteri. Duo feoda de eodem honore que Robertus de Ovinge tenet excepte una hida quam Robertus de Chetwode tenet.

De feodo de Say ubi habetur breve, ut in alio rotulo.

Craulee. De veteri. Ricardus de Lindeseye tenet quartam partem unius feodi de dicto honore.

Hekenhey. De veteri. Adam filius Nicholai tenet viij. partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Solebur'. De veteri. Walterus Mansel unum feodum in Solebur' de dicto honore.

Feoda de Trayly.

Baronia de Trayly novem feoda. Nullum breve.

Chivelden. Unde Brianus unum feodum in Chiveldon'; tenet de honore de Glouc', et ipse de domino rege.

Chelinton' cum Hynewyk'. De veteri. Brianus filius Alani et Thomas de Huse unum feodum de eodem honore.

Rokesdon'. De veteri. Johannes de Boeles tenet unum feodum et dimidium de eodem honore.

Turveye. De veteri. Ricardus de Ardres et Eustachius Mordant tenent unum feodum de eodem honore.

Lutegareshal'. De veteri. Waleram le Thyeys tenet unum feodum de eodem honore.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 885

II.151-192 - cont.

Holekote, Bideham. De veteri. Gilbertus Passelewe tenet duo feoda de dicto honore.

Nortgylle. De veteri. Willelmus de la Sucche tenet unum feodum in dote de dicto honore.

Sutgylle. De veteri. Walterus de Godarvill' dimidium feodum de dicto honore.

Baronia Domini Willelmi de Bello Campo Bed' que est capitalis honor.

Nomina villatarum et eas tenencium quas tenet de rege.

Blechesho. De veteri. Simon de Pateshull' tenet manerium de Blechesho pro feodo unius militis de dicto honore.

Radeuell'. De veteri. Idem tenet dimidium feodum in Radeuell' et dimidiam virgatam terre, et in Sharnebroc quartam partem et xl. partem unius militis, et in Lega dimidiam hydam terre de dicto honore.

Hynewyk. De veteri. Johannes de Pabeham tenet in Hynewyk et in Pabenham dimidium feodum de dicto honore.

Bydeham. De veteri. Gilbertus Passelewe tenet in eadem villa unam hydam terre de dicto honore.

Bruham. De veteri. Walterus de Swinesheved et Willelmus Malherbe tenent in Bruham feodum unius militis de domino Willelmo de Bello Campo Bed'.

Gilbertus Passelewe tenet in eadem de dicto honore dimidium feodum. Idem Gilbertus et Willelmus Malherbe tenent decimam partem unius militis de dicto honore. De veteri.

Sharnebroc. De veteri. Petrus le Loreng' tenet quintam partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Galfridus filius Pagani quintam partem unius militis de dicto honore. De veteri.

Karleton'. De veteri. Willelmus Malherbe tenet vj. partem unius militis in eadem de dicto honore.

Henricus de Sharnebroc sextam partem unius militis in eadem de dicto honore. De veteri.

Robertus de Montibus tenet in eadem decimam partem unius militis de dicto honore. De veteri.

Turveya. De veteri. Adam filius Roberti et Willelmus Breres et Radulfus de Northo tenent quintam partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Stacheden'. De veteri. Willelmus de Bello Campo Bed' tenet terciam partem ville in dominico. Johannes de Boeles tenet de eo duas virgatas terre in dominico. Galfridus de Burdeleys unam hydam in eadem de eodem; Galfridus filius Roberti unam hydam de eodem; Walterus de Stached' unam hydam de eodem; Matheus Blundus unam hydam de eodem; Petrus de Goldington et Galfridus Colston' unam hydam de eodem; Willelmus filius Ricardi unam hydam de eodem; Thomas Murdac et Simon Ariewine unam hydam de eodem honore.

Prior de Neuham et Galfridus Burdeleys debent terciam partem unius militis et tenent de abbate de Wardon'. De veteri.

880 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

De veteri. Robertus Golston' unam virgatam terre de eodem honore; Prior de Bissemade duas virgatas terre et dimidiam de eodem honore; Nicholaus Pinceware unam virgatam terre de eodem honore; Johannes Cocus unam virgatam terre de eodem honore; Goce clericus dimidiam virgatam terre de eodem honore; Willelmus Perteshuil' dimidiam virgatam de eodem honore.

Robertus [1] de Gyminges tenet terciam partem unius militis in Stacheden' de domino rege in capite.

Colingwurth. Ricardus de Weldelof tenet unum feodum de dicto honore Bedefordie.

Bereford'. De veteri. Henricus de Bereford' tenet dimidium feodum et xvam partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Bereford'. Hugo de Bretevill' tenet dimidium feodum et xiij. partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Bereford'. De veteri. Hamo de Crevequer tenet duas hydas pro tercia parte unius militis de dicto honore.

Bereford'. Robert de Sippethorb tenet wardam, scilicet unam hydam et dimidiam de dicto honore, et respondet pro xvma parte feodi.

Bereford'. Simon de Pateshull' tenet vtam partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Ravenesden'. De veteri. Johannes le Sauvage et Willelmus Engaygne tenent unam hydam et dimidiam pro xxxvij. parte unius militis de dicto honore.

Ravenesden'. Nicholaus Pypart tenet unam virgatam terre pro xxxviija parte feodi de dicto honore.

Ravenesden'. De veteri. Galfridus de Eyringeham tenet unam virgatam terre pro xxxviij. parte unius militis de dicto honore.

Ravenesden'. Willelmus Franceys et Hugo Picot tenent ij. virgatas terre pro xxxyjta parte unius militis de dicto honore.

Ravenesden'. De veteri. Radulfus filius Willelmi et Nigellus de Radeuell' tenent iij. virgatas terre pro xxxiiij. parte unius militis de dicto honore.

Saleho. Prior de Neuham tenet duas hydas terre pro xvja parte unius militis de dicto honore.

Ronhal'. De veteri. Willelmus de Bello Campo tenet dimidium feodum in Ronhal' de domino rege in capite.

Ronhal. De veteri. Johannes de Flamvill' tenet iij. virgatas terre pro xxiiijta parte miius militis de dicto fionore Bedefordie.

Item Goldinton' de honore Bedefordie. De veteri. Abbas de Wardon' tenet Putenho cum pertinenciis pro feodo unius militis de dicto honore. Willelmus de Goldinton' tenet dimidium feodum de dicto honore. Robertus Pippard tenet quartam partem feodi unius militis de dicto honore. Robertus Ruffus et Rogerus Wygeyn tenent xiiij. partem feodi unius militis de dicto honore.

Parva Stocton'. Thomas filius Jordani tenet decimam partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Item Kaysho de honore Bedefordie. Willelmus de Bello Campo tenet duas hydas in eadem in capite de domino rege. De veteri.


[1] This entry appears to be misplaced.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 887

II.151-192 - cont.

Willelmus Tuaud xxvtam partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Walterus de la Lende xxxam partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Item Risleg' de honore Bedefordie. Simon Perteshuil' tenet feodum unius miitis de dicto honore.

Item Bolehurst de dicto honore. De veteri. Robertus de Shilbethorp' tenet xxxvjtam partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Robertus Basset tenet xvjam partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Item Middelton'. Hugo de Lega tenet unam hydam terre per servicium xxxme partis unius militis de dicto honore.

Item Wotton' de honore Bedefordie. De veteri. Feodum David Loereng', feod' Willelmi de Sancto Edwardo, feodum Gilberti de Hendon, feodum Galfridi filii Pagani, feodum David de Herdwyk, feodum del Hoo, respondent pro tribus feodis de dicto honore.

Chaugrave de dicto honore. De veteri. Petrus le Loereng' tenet unum feodum et ij. hidas, unde quinque faciunt feodum, de dicto honore.

Hocclive. De eodem honore. Rogerus de Scaecario tenet Hocclive in custodia cum herede Johannis Malherbe, scilicet unum feodum de dicto honore.

Item Hauton' de eodem honore. Rogerus de Scaccario tenet duas hydas; Willelmus Brito unam hydam et dimidiam; Henricus Cosin dimidiam hydam; Johannes de Flamvill' unam hydam; Petrus persona unam virgatam; Willelmus Malherbe dimidiam virgatam; moniales de Chikesend' unam virgatam de dicto honore.

Aspel' cum Middelton' de eodem honore. Hubertus de Burgo tenet Aspel', et magister Alexander de Swereford tenet Middelton', et ille qui tenet Middelton' respondet pro Middelton', Aspel' et Henlawe pro uno scutagio de dicto honore, ut dicitur.

Everesholt de eodem honore. Johannes filius Milonis tenet Everesholt pro uno feodo de dicto honore.

Saleford de eodem honore. Nigellus de Saleford' tenet Saleford' pro uno feodo de dicto honore.

Patesgrave de eodem honore. Henricus Blancfront tenet unam virgatam terre; respondet pro xx. parte unius militis.

Haunnes de eodem honore. [1] Willelmus de Bello Campo tenet unam hydam et iij. virgatas et dimidiam in capite de domino rege de eodem honore.

Hugo Gobyon tenet apud Hechani et Stradlee et Faudho et Sarpenho duo feoda de dicto honore.

Johannes de la Mare et Nicholaus de Bueles tenent in Gravehurst et Eye dimidium feodum de eodem honore.

Simon de Pateshull' tenet in villa de Kaynho vtam partem unius feodi de dicto honore.

Parva Stocton' de eodem honore in parte. Thomas filius Jordani tenet decimam partem unius militis in eadem de dicto honore.

Upton' cum Chalveye. Petrus de Galdington' tenet unum feodum de dicto honore.

Maudon'. Heredes Gilberti de Cotes tenent unam hydam de eodem honore.


[1] This marginal note is linked by a bracket to this and the next three entries.

888 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

Henlawe. Robertus Passelewe ij. hydas de dicto honore de domino rege.

Evereshawe. Willelmus de Evereshawe tenet dimidium feodum de Willelmo de Bello Campo Bed'.

Merse. Robertus Brien et Egidius de Insula tenent dimidium feodum militis de dicto honore.

Latebur'. Domina Isabella de Albinaco tenet dimidium feodum de dicto honore.

Limeluid'. Michael Sen' j. feodum et dimidium et domina Nicholaa unum feodum et dimidium.

Libertas Comitis Herefordie.

Honor de Kenebauton. Verumptamen est in comitatu Huntedonie, set villate pertinentes sunt in comitatu Bedefordie; et tenet de rege.

Tillebroc de dicto honore. De veteri. Willelmus Janitor tenet v. virgatas terre in Tillebroc de domino comite Herefordie per servicium iiijte partis unius militis.

Ricardus tenet ij. virgatas terre de dicto honore per servicium xma partis unius militis. De veteri.

Alanus de Wanwyle tenet unam virgatam de dicto honore. De veteri.

Walterus filius Alexandri tenet unam virgatam terre pro xvma parte unius militis de dicto honore. De veteri.

Walterus Falconarius tenet dimidiam virgatam terre de eodem honore pro xl. parte unius militis. De veteri.

Petrus de Lekeburn' tenet viij. virgatas terre de eodem honore pro sexta parte unius militis. De veteri.

Dene de eodem honore. Prior de Huntedon' tenet iiij. virgatas terre in Dene de dicto honore pro xma parte unius militis.

Willelmus de Wasconia tenet unam virgatam terre de eodem honore pro xxma parte feodi unius militis.

Pertenhal' de dicto honore in parte. Ricardus de Pertenhal' tenet xam partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Willelmus le Garcon' tenet xxam partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Parva Stocton' in parte. Ricardus de Pertenhale xxam partem unius miitis de dicto honore, una cum tribus feodis et dimidia et tredecima parte militis in alio rotulo.

Baronia de Eton'. Nullum breve.

Capitalis honor. Willelmus de Bello Campo de Eton' tenet Eton' cum baronia ad eandem pertinente de domino rege in capite.

Subscripti feoffati sunt de eo de novo et defendunt feoda sua:-

Osbertus de Bathonia tenet duas hydas de dicto honore pro feodo dimidii militis. De novo.

Simon de Pateshull' tenet unam carucatam terre de dicto honore pro xl. parte unius militis. De novo.

Robertus de Wauton' tenet unam carucatam terre de dicto honore pro xl. parte unius militis. De novo.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 889

II.151-192 - cont.

Ermetruda tenet uj. virgatam terre per servicium iiijta partis unius militis de dicto honore. De novo.

Item de dicto honore de Eton'.

Willelmus Pinceware tenet dimidiam hydam terre pro xiiij. parte unius feodi de eodem honore.

Reginaldus de Costentin tenet dimidiam hydam terre pro xiiija parte unius militis de eodem honore. De novo.

Galfridus de Bretevill' tenet unam virgatam terre et dimidiam pro xiiij. parte unius militis de eodem honore.

Galfridus de Tylia tenet ij. virgatas terre pro xlma parte unius militis de eodem honore. De novo.

Ricardus de Bello Campo in Chalvesterne tenet unam virgatam terre pro xxma parte unius militis de eodem honore.

Radulfus Ridel dimidiam virgatam terre pro xva parte unius militis de eodem honore. De novo.

Prior Hospitalariorum tenet ifij. virgatas in puram elemosinam.

Prior de Sancto Neotho iiij. virgatas terre in puram elemosinam.

Robertus de Besevill', Ricardus filius Roberti, prior de Kalduell' tenent sextam partem unius militis in Eton' de eodem honore.

Nicholaus de Cernes tenet unum feodum nomine dotis cum uxore sua et subscripti defendunt duo feoda et dimidium. De veteri.

Hugo filius Oliveri de Edelesbir' tenet inde unum dimidium feodum in comitatu Buk'. De veteri.

Adam de Bello Campo tenet inde dimidium feodum. De veteri.

Hugo de Audevill' dimidium feodum excepta una virgata terre in Kenendewyk'. De veteri.

Thomas filius Bernardi dimidium feodum in Beston'.

Thomas de Barging' quartam partem unius feodi.

Heredes Radulfi de Tyvill' dimidium feodum in Chykewell'.

Heredes Nicholai de Hanestye quartam partem unius feodi.

Walterus de Karon xliijam partem unius militis in Eton'.

Prior de Kaldewell' et Willelmus de Bello Campo iiijam partem unius feodi.

Willelmus Wischard unum quarterium unius militis de dicto honore.

Abbas de Wardon' ij. hydas de dicto honore.

Domina de Clifton' dimidium feodum de dicto honore.

Et sciendum quod Simon de la More clamat habere dominicum suum quietum.

Baronia de Kaynho tenetur de rege in capite.

Brevia set ad terminum in parte pro Isabella de Albinaco. Ad Baroniam illam pertinent xx v. feoda, unde data sunt in elemosinam xij. feoda.

Cotes. Radulfus de Sancto Amando et Isabella tenent unum feodum in Cotes de rege.

Kaynho. Domina Isabella de Albinaco tenet in capite de domino rege in Kaynho et Clophull' in dominico unum feodum et quintam partem unius militis.

890 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

Sharpenho. Johannes filius Hugonis tenet in Sharpenho unum feodum excepta una hyda de dicto honore.

Pullokeshull'. De veteri. Willelmus Pirot et Willelmus de Faudho tenent in villa de Pullokeshull' unum feodum de eodem honore.

Henricus Boynon in eadem villa dimidium feodum de eodem honore,

Shivelesho. Radulfus filius Ricardi, Henricus filius Willelmi, Willelmus Wischard tenent in villa de Shivelesho dimidium feodum de eodem honore.

Domina Johanna de Albinaco dotata est de tercia parte ilfius baronie, et defendit pro quinque feodis in dominico. De veteri.

Hullebroc [1] cum Hamethull'. Radulfus de Merston' tenet unum feodum et dimidium, et respondet dicte Johanne et tenet in dominico.

Tyrefeud. Isabella de eadem tenet unum feodum de dicto honore.

Herlingdon'. Radulfus Pyrot tenet et respondet dicto honori de Kaynho in comitatibus Bed' et Buk' pro iiij. feodis; partiri debet, medietas Isabelle et medietas Radulfo.

Turesheye. Ricardus filius Roberti de Turesheye respondet dicto honori de uno feodo.

Tingrie, Craulee cum Holekote. Walterus filius Simonis tenet ij. feoda et dimidium de dicto honore.

Westcotes. Radulfus de Sancto Amando et Isabella de Albinaco dimidium feodum et vicesimam partem unius militis in dominico.

Stratton'. Ricardus Cosyn in Holma et Stratton' quintam partem unius militis de dicto honore et unam hydam.

Honlawe. Elemosina. Prior de Lantoney v. hydas de dicto honore in elemosina.

Et sciendum quod Radulfus de Sancto Amando et domina Isabella de Albinaco percipiant [2] baroniam de Kaynho.

Radulfus de Sancto Amando habet breve suum de scutagio suo habendo.

Domina Isabella habet breve suum usque in octabas Sancti Hillarii.

Baronia de Wahull' xxx. feoda, set sunt in diversis comitatibus Subscripti feoffati sunt de dicta baronia. Tenetur de rege in capite. Capitalis honor in comitatibus Buk' et Bed'.

Podington'. Domina Emma de Podington' tenet totam villatam de Johanne de Gray pro uno feodo de dicto honore.

Sharnebroc. De veteri. Ricardus de la Rivere tenet in eadem de Johanne de Gray de dicto honore dimidium feodum.

Lega de eodem honore. De veteri. Johannes de Gray tenet in eadem feodum unius militis in dominico de dicto honore.

Turveya de eodem in parte. De veteri. Sanson' le Mansel tenet in eadem dimidium feodum, et die de dicto honore.


[1] Read Mullebroc.
[2] Read participant.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 891

II.151-192 - cont.

Segenho de dicto honore. De veteri. Henricus de Northwode tenet feodum unius militis de dicto honore. Jacobus de Kauz respondet Johanni de Gray pro quinta parte unius militis de dicto honore. Nigellus de Chauton' tenet dimidium feodum de dicto honore. Gilbertus Passelewe tenet dimidium feodum in eadem de dicto honore. Alanus Caperon' tenet vtam partem unius militis de dicto honore. Ricardus Beyvin tenet septimam et xij. partem feodi de dicto honore.

Toterho de eodem honore. De veteri. Willelmus de Eltesdon' et Rogerus de Welton' tenent in eadem unum feodum de dicto honore.

Maudon' de eodem. De veteri. Mabilia de Bray in eadem dimidium feodum de eodem honore.

Shivelesho de eodem honore in parte. De veteri. Thomas de Bray in eadem et in Wavenden' ij. feoda de eodem.

Wyminton' de eodem in parte. Willelmus de Welton' tenet in eadem villa feodum unius militis de Willelmo de Cantilupo, et ipse de dicto honore.

Wahull'. De veteri. Robertus Parentin tenet in eadem septimam partem unius militis de dicto honore. Reginaldus de la Hoo tenet in eadem quintam partem unius militis de dicto honore. Radulfus Druel in eadem decimam partem unius militis de eodem honore. Radulfus Caperon' tenet in eadem xxiij. partem feodi unius militis de dicto honore. Robertus filius Wymarc in eadem xl. partem unius militis de eodem honore.

Langeford'. De eodem. Robertus Agylon tenet in dotem cum uxore sua Langeford' pro uno feodo de dicto honore.

Flitte. De eodem honore. Philippus de Flitte tenet in eadem unum feodum de dicto honore.

Riseleg' in parte de eodem honore. Willelmus Parentin tenet xam partem unius mllitis de dicto honore. Henricus de Riseleg' tenet viij. partem unius militis de dicto honore.

Henlawe. Johannes de Grey tenet iij. hydas de dicta baronia.

Raveneston'. Robertus de Wahull' tenet unum feodum in dominico de baronia sua.

Wavendon'. Gilbertus Passelewe de Wavendon' tenet iiijam partem unius militis de dicto honore. Willelmus de Bray de eadem tenet quartam partem de dicto honore.

Sciendum autem quod de nullo prescripto capitall honore habebit rex scutagium propter brevia que habent nisi de baronia de Wulrington' ubi nullum est breve, et de baronia de Bello Campo de Eton' ubi nullum est breve.

Et de feodis comitisse Oxonie que tenet de domino rege in capite in comitatibus Buk' et Bed'.

Et de baronia de Crayly. [1]


[1] Read Trayly.

892 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

Feoda de quibus Ricardus Comes recipit scutagium in comitatibus Bed' et Buk' videlicet.

De comitissa Oxonie cie feodis que tenet de comite de Clare, videlicet de dimidio feodo in Hunsdensdon'.

Johannes Moriel tenet dimidium feodum in Langeport de eodem honore.

Robertus de Ryouston' [1] in eadem dimidium feodum de eodem honore. Breve pro feodis comitis. [2]

Philippus de Wrokeshull' tenet unum feodum in eadem de eodem honore.

Hugo de Blancmull' [3] et Henricus de Bottelby tenent unum feodum in Raveneston' de eodem honore.

Ricardus Hareg tenet terciam partem unius militis in Radeclive de Radulfo Hareg, et ipse de comite.

Radulfus Hareg tenet unum feodum in eadem et unum feodum in Westbur' de dicto comite.

Abbas de Nuttele tenet dimidium feodum in Hyldesdon' de dicto comite.

Paulinus Peyvre unum feodum in Wavindon' et abbas de Woburne quartam partem in eadem.

Johannes de Gray tenet iiijtam partem unius feodi in Blechele de eodem comite.

Hugo de +Verly+ unum feodum in Woketon' et Radulfus Marescallus unum feodum in Magna Lufford'.

Johannes filius Nicholai [4] tenet xxam partem in Luffton', et Willelmus de Beause unum feodum in Bradewell'.

Petrus Barre tenet unum feodum in Staunton' et Radulfus de Sancto Amando ij. hidas in Crendon'.

Rogerus de Wimbervill' tenet ij. partes unius feodi in Quenton' et dimidium feodum in Botteglasdon'.

Thomas de Valuynes tenet ij. hidas in eadem, et Gilbertus de Greynvill' terciam partem unius militis in Drayton'.

Henricus de Auvers tenet unam hydam in Sulebur' et unum feodum in Stiuekele de eodem comite.

Ricardus Godard' tenet dimidium feodum in Swanebume de dicto comite.

NOMINA ILLORUM QUI HABENT BREVIA DE HABENDIS SCUTAGIIS SUIS UBI NON EST CAPITALIS HONOR.

Stephanus de Laundres et Nicholaus Peyncurt tenent dimidium feodum de Felmeresham de Henrico de Hastiging et de Johanne Bailiol de honore Huntedon'. Breve pro habendo respectu in Hastinges. [5]


[1] Read Brouston'.
[2] This marginal note applies also to the fourteen entries that follow.
[3] Read Blancmuster.
[4] Read Nicholas le Faukoner.
[5] This marginal note applies also to the six entries that follow.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 893

II.151-192 - cont.

Radulfus Morin tenet ij. teoda in Harewold' de eodem de dicto honore.

Rogerus de Subbur' tenet dimidium feodum de eodem de dicto honore.

Johannes Pincerna de Clifton' tenet quartam partem unius feodi de eodem de dicto honore.

Radulfus de Kamays tenet dimidium feodum de eodem in Pettesho de eodem honore.

Robertus de Hersy [1] tenet quartam partem unius militis in Craule de eodem de dicto honore.

Radulfus Pincerna tenet unum quarterium in Brauston' de eodem de dicto honore.

Robertus de Gynes tenet ij. feoda in Stiventon' de rege in capite.

Everardus de Parva Stocton' tenet xxxiiij. partem de dicto Roberto et de feodo de Bet'.

Gilbertus de Breute tenet de eodem in Wengrave unum feodum et dimidium de eodem honore.

Simon de Holewell et Philippus serviens tenet quartam partem unius militis in Turveye de honore de Aubeny.

Radulfus filius Reginaldi tenet in eadem terciam partem j. militis de dicto honore.

Simon Berard' tenet iij. partem unius militis in Acle de dicto honore.

Idem Simon tenet iij. partes unius militis in Clifton' et Newenton' de dicto honore.

Henricus de Suleby, Johannes de Croxton' et Radulfus de Sancto Saunsone tenent feodum unius militis in Schelton' de Patrico de Chawurches de honore de Chawurch'.

Lucas de Calum, Milo de Eello Campo et Radulfus filius Johannis tenent dimidium feodum unius militis in Lavenden' de eodem de dicto honore.

Aumaricus de Nuers tenet in Weston' dimidium feodum de eodem de dicto honore.

Robertus Curtfalur [2] tenet dimidium feodum in eadem de dicto honore.

Ricardus de Gatesden tenet iiij. partem unius feodi in Latebir' de eodem et de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Schyrinton' tenet dimidium feodum in Phillegrave de eodem et de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Upton' et Ricardus de Evereshud et Dionis' fil' Radulfi tenent unum feodum in Eversheud' de Willelmo de Aubarvill' et de honore de Aubervill'.

Abbas de Woburn' tenet in Hare unum feodum de eodem de dicto honore.


[1] Read Meysy.
[2] Read Curtstalur.

894 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

Henricus de Blancfrund et vill' [1] Blaunfrunt tenent unum feodum in Potesgrave de Galfrido de Lucy de honore Gloucestrie et habet breve usque in octavam Clausi Pasche.

Rogerus de Wymbervill' tenet in Folebroc dimidium feodum de dicto Galfrido de eodem honore.

Idem Rogerus tenet unum feodum in Grava de eodem Galfrido de dicto honore.

Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet in capite de domino rege Eyton' cum Birchemor, Wylibesende [2] cum Houton' pro uno feodo unius militis.

Ricardus filius Willelmi tenet vtam partem unius militis de Willelmo de Cantilupo de honore de Hunstewurth.

Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet unam virgatam terre in Henlawe de honore de Eyton'.

Willelmus de Stratford' tenet feodum unius militis nomine dotis uxoris dicti Willelmi de Cantilupo de feodo Douly.

Henricus de Nafford' et Radulfus le Poher tenent ij. feoda in Hentemore [3] de eodem Willelmo in escambio feodi de Cestre.

Paulinus Peyvre tenet iiij. partem unius feodi in Chotho [4] de feodo dicti Willelmi.

Heredes Nicholai Quatremays tenent dimidium feodum in Potton' de honore de Huntedon' de feodo Johannis filii Roberti, unde Ada uxor sua habet breve.

Michael Burdet et domina de Sutton' tenent in Potton' dimidium feodum de feodo Johannis filiis Roberti.

David de Flittewyk' et Nicholaus de Thingre tenent in Craule et Flittewyk' unum feodum de Willelmo le Fort, comite Aubemar'. Johannes de Sancto Martino [5] tenet in Lavenden' ij. partes dimidii feodi de comite Aubem'.

Simon de Raveneston' tenet in villa de Weston' iij. partem dimidii feodi unius militis de parte comitis de Aubem'.

Drogo de Goussles tenet unum feodum in Beston' de Ricardo de Lindon', unde habet breve.

Willelmus Luvel tenet in Chelton' et Mogerhangre de honore Leycestrie.

Rogerus de Craft tenet unum feodum in Weston' de comite Leycestrie.

Simon de Turvill' unum feodum in eadem de dicto honore.

Rogerus de Hyda unum dimidium feodum de eodem honore.

Heredes Willelmi Malet dimidium feodum de dicto honore,

Hugo de Bosco tenet in Cestresham dimidium feodum de dicto honore.


[1] Read Willelmus.
[2] Read Wibbesnade.
[3] Read Mentemore, [4] Read Totenho.
[5] Read Medardo,

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 895

II.151-192 - cont.

Rogerus Galyon tenet xam partem partem unius militis in Aumodesham de dicto honore.

Andreas le Gays et abbas de Messenden' tenent ij. feoda in Chaufunte Sancti Petri de Simone de Turvill' de dicto honore.

Gilbertus de Segrave tenet quartam partem unius feodi in La Penne de dicto honore.

Willelmus Pyk tenet iiijtam partem unius feodi in eadem de dicto honore.

Johannes de Penna xxam partem unius feodi in eadem de eodem honore.

Johannes Glorie tenet xam partem unius feodi in eadem de dicto honore.

Prior de Merton tenet in Rapelowe1 de dicto honore ij. feoda.

Osbertus de Saunterdon' tenet unum feodum cum vicesima parte unius feodi in eadem de dicto honore.

Abbas de Westmonasterio habet breve pro auxilio habendo in Magna Halewell' et in Denham ubi non est nisi firma.

Hugo de Chastilun tenet unum feodum in Magna Lechamstide de Willelmo de Say.

Radulfus de Chetwode tenet j. feodum in Chetwod' de dicto Willelmo, et ipse de rege.

Aumaricus de Nouwers tenet in Gayhurst j. feodum de dicto Willelmo, et ipse de rege.

Willelmus de Agulun tenet dimidium feodum in Crofton' de dicto Willelmo, et ipse de rege.

Robertus de Chetwode tenet unam hydam terre in Ovinge de eodem Willelmo, et ipse de rege.

Ricardus filius Ricardi tenet in Parva Lechamstid' ij. partes unius feodi de Humfrido de Bohun, comite Hertfordie. [2]

Petrus Carbonel tenet dimidium feodum in Addinton' de Johanne filio Galfridi de honore de Quemdo', et ipse de comite Herfordie.

Thomas de Botteclaydon' tenet in eadem quintam partem unius feodi de dicto honore.

Robertus Passelewe tenet ij. hydas in Swaneburne de dicto honore.

Johannes de Ran tenet in Aumodesham iiijtam partem unius feodi de dicto comite et de eodem honore.

Willelmus Janitor tenet quinque virgatas de Tillebroc de comite Hertfordie [2] per servicium quarte partis.

Petrus de Lekeburn' viij. virgatas pro vjt a parte unius militis. Ricardus de eadem tenet ij. virgatas terre per servicium xme partis unius militis.

Dalan' Dewelies tenet unam virgatam de eodem honore.

Walterus filius Alexandri unam virgatam terre pro xvma parte unius militis.


[1] Read Tapelowe.
[2] Read Herefordie.

896 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.151-192 - cont.

Walterus Fauconarius dimidiam virgatem terre pro xlma parte unius feodi.

Comitissa de Warwyk' tenet ij. feoda in Magna Brichull' de comite Arundelll.

Hugo de Verly tenet in Woketon' unum feodum de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Thomas Maunsel tenet unum feodum in Schenle de dicto comite, et comes de rege.

Idem comes tenet Houneye pro ij. feodis et dimidio in dominico.

Simon de Ouneye et Bartholomeus de Elmetewell' tenent in Clifton' de dicto comite pro iiijta parte unius militis.

Robertus de la Batayle tenent [1] dimidium feodum in Emberton' de comite, et comes de rege.

Johannes de Karny [2] tenet ij. feoda in Syrincton' de domino rege in capite.

Robertus de Thotehal' unum feodum de Willelmo Mauduit in Hampslape, et ipse de rege.

Henricus de Beuse unum quarterium in eadem de dicto Willelmo.

Robertus Lup' unum quarterium in eadem de dicto honore.

Willelmus de Medburn' unum quarterium in eadem et de eodem.

Radulfus de Cheyneye unum quarterium in eadem et de eodem.

Willelmus Lup' unum quarterium in eadem et de eodem.

Walterus de Thotehale unum quarterium in eadem et de eodem.

Petrus Blundus unum quarterium in eadem et de eodem.

Robertus de Bello Alneto xxmam partem unius feodi.

Thomas Basset ixnam partem unius feodi in eadem et de eodem.

Willelmus de Simily tenet de domino rege in Magna Riseburwe unum feodum in capite.

Galfridus filius Ricardi tenet iij. partem unius feodi in Hadenham de episcopo Rouecestrie.

Adam de Spaldinton' tenet quandam terram de dicto episcopo ita quod quando scutagium currit dat xl.s. et sic ad plus plus et ad minus minus.

Willelmus de Feynes tenet ij. feoda in Wendovere de domino rege.

Robertus de Hoggeshawe et Galfridus filius Johannis tenent in Kerslawe unum feodum de honore Sal'.

Nicholaus de Molis tenet unum feodum in Herdewyk', et habet breve.

Warinus filius Geroldi tenet iij. partes unius feodi in Morton' de domino rege.


[1] Read tenet.
[2] Read Karun.

BEDFORD AND BUCKINGHAM. 897

II.151-192 - cont.

Idem tenet dimidium feodum in Bechehampton' et dimidium feodum in Muresl' de eodem.

Item de honore de Hereford'.

Prior de Huntedon' tenet iij. virgates pro decima parte unius militis in Tillebrock'.

Willelmus de Gasconia tenet xxam partem unius militis in eadem.

Ricardus de Pertehale in eadem xam partem unius militis.

Item Willelmus de Gasconia tenet xxam partem in eadem.

Item Ricardus de Pertehale tenet in eadem xxam partem de eodem honore.

MIDDLESEX.

MIDDELSEXIA.

S.ij.19.II.613-615.

SCUTAGIUM DE COMITATU MIDDELSEXIE.

De Nicholao de Bassingeburn' quartam partem militis in Hargodelston', qui tenet de Ricaido de Mumfichet, et Ricardus de rege.

De Egidia Blemund' j. feodum in Soca Blemund', et tenet de Waltero filio Roberti, et ipse de rege.

Item de episcopate, Londoniensi.

De Willelmo de Veer quartam partem feodi in Stebeneth'.

De Hospitalariis de Clerekenewell' quartam partem feodi in eadem villa.

De Alano le Baud dimidium feodum in Iseldone.

De Ricardo de Pontefracto terciam partem feodi in Stebeneth'.

De Templariis dimidium feodum in Hakeneye.

De Petro filio Alulfi dimidium feodum in Acton'.

Item de archiepiscopatu Cantuariensi in eodem comitatu.

De Alicia de Suhaul' j. feodum in Hese.

De Roberto de Wimbeldon' dimidium feodum in eadem villa.

De Rogero de Becheswurth' j. feodum et dimidium in Herefeud', et tenet de rege in capite.

De Templarus j. feodum in Cranford', et tenent de Willelmo de Englefeud', et ipse de Rogero de Sumeri, et ipse de rege. Breve.

De magistro de Hundeslauwe j. feodum, et tenet de Johanne de Nevil', et ipse de rege. Breve.

De priore de Novo Loco j. feodum in Westbedefunte de Willelmo de Windlesor', et ipse de rege.

De Ricardo de Stanes dimidium feodum de eodem Willelmo, et ipse de rege in Stanewell' et Bedefunte.

De Willelmo de la Poile dimidium feodum de eodem Willelmo in eadem villa, et ipse de rege.

898 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.19.II.613-615 - cont.

De Pagano de Clermund' dimidium feodum de eodem Willelmo in eadem villa, et ipse de rege.

De Edwardo de Winton' dimidium feodum et quartem dimidii feodi in Litfinton' de Willelmo Blundo de Norff', et ipse de rege.

De Johanne de Valle Torta quartem feodi in eadem villa de eodem Willelmo, et ipse de rege.

De Henrico Bocointe dimidium feodum in Parva Stanmere de priore Sancti Bartholomei, et ipse de Willelmo de Reymes, et ipse de rege.

De Willelmo Aucelln quartem feodi in eadem villa eodem modo.

De Luca Walerand' quartem feodi in eadem villa eodem modo.

De Johanne Blundo quartem feodi de Willelmo de Say, et ipse de rege in Edelmeton'.

De priore Sancte Trinitatis London' de feodo Heyrun quartem feodi de eodem Willelmo in Edelmeton'.

De Willelmo filio Reyneri quartem feodi de eodem Willelmo in eadem villa.

De Hugone Peverel quintam partem feodi et xl. partem de eodem Willelmo in eadem villa.

De Quintino de Neweport de feodo de Querendon' quintam feodi de eodem in eadem villa.

De Laurenc' de Forda xij. feodi de eodem Wi lelmo in eadem villa.

De Willelmo filio Galfridi x. feodi de eodem Willelmo in eadem villa.

Breve.

Item de honore de Mandevil', et habet quietanciam per breve.

De Ricardo de Plesseto quintem feodi in Enefeud' de comite Herrefordie, et ipse de rege.

De Rogero Buteler quartem feodi in eadem villa de eodem comite eodem modo.

De Willelmo de Feringes quintem feodi in eadem villa eodem modo.

De Ricardo Buteler x. feodi in eadem villa eodem modo.

De Johanne filio Galfridi x. feodi in eadem villa.

De Johanna de O. j. feodum in Norhal' de eodem comite de eodem honore.

De Ernullo de Mandevil' j. feodum in Mimmes de comite Herefordie.

De Willelmo de Hunlad' duodecimam partem militis.

De Widone de Atfeud' quintam partem militis.

De Rosamunda quintam partem militis.

De Willelmo de Horsted' octavum feodi in Hidland' de rege in manerio de Keninton'.

MIDDLESEX. 899

S.ij.19.II.517.

Nomina resistcncium de dicto scutagio.

De Nicholao de Bassingeburn' in Hargodeston' quartem partem feodi.

De Alicia de Suhaul' j. feodum in Hese per ballivum de Herwes.

De Roberto de Wimbeldon' dimidium feodum in Hese per ballivum de Herwes.

De Eadwardo de Winton' dimidium feodum et quartam feodi in Litlinton'.

De Johanne de Valle Torta quartem feodi in eadem villa.

De Willelmo de Horsted' octavum in Hidland', et non solvit pro ballivo de Keninton'.

De Templariis dimidium feodum in Hakeneye de episcopate Londoniensi.

Summonitores Robertus de Cruce, Alanus de Soresdich'.

In libro.

II.621-622.

Cives Londoniarum, Robertus filius Johannis et Radulfus Aswy aurifab' pro eis, reddunt compotum de predicto auxilio concesso in hoc comitatu, scilicet de xxiiijorl. viij.s. iiij.d.

De quarta parte unius feodi Nicholai de Bassingburn' in Haregodeston' de baronia Ricardi de Mumfichet;

Et de j. feodo Egidie Blemund in Soka Blemund' de baronia Roberti filii Walteri;

Et de quarta parte unius feodi Willelmi de Ver in Stebenheth de baronia episcopi Londoniensis;

Et de quarta parte unius feodi Hospitalariorum Ierosolyme ibidem;

Et de dimidio feodo Radulfi de Bemers in Iseldon';

Et de tercia parte unius feodi Ricardi de Ponte Fracto in Stebenheth';

Et de dimidio feodo Templariorum in Hakenhe;

Et de dimidio feodo Petri filii Alulphi in Acton';

Et de uno feodo Alicie de Suhall' in Hese de baronia archiepiscopi Cantuariensis;

Et de dimidio feodo Roberti de Wymbeldon' ibidem;

Et de uno feodo et dimidio Rogeri de Bochiswine' in Harefeld';

Et de uno feodo prioris de Novo Loco in Westbedefunt' de baronia Willelmi de Wyndesore;

Et de dimidio feodo Ricardi de Stones in Stanewell' et Bedefunt' de baronia eiusdem;

Et de dimidio feodo Willelmi de Pulla de baronia eiusdem;

Et de dimidio feodo Pagani de Claro Monte de baronia eiusdem;

Et de dimidio et iiijta parte unius feodi Edwardi de Winton' in Litleton' de baronia Willelmi Blundi de Norff';

Et de iiijta parte unius feodi Johannis de Valle Torta ibidem de eadem baronia;

Et de dimidio Henrici Bocoynte in Parva Stan mere de baronia Willelmi de Reymes;

900 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.621-622 - cont.

Et de iiijta parte unius feodi Willelmi Ahuntelyn' de eadem baronia;

Et de iiijta parte unius feodi Luce Walraund' ibidem de eadem baronia;

Et de viijta parte unius feodi Willelmi de Horsted' in Kenynton' quod tenet de rege in capite;

Et de j. feodo Willelmi de Englefeud' de baronia de Dudelegh'.

In thesauro viij.l. iij.s. iiij.d. Et debent xvj.l. v.s., set respondent inde in magno rotulo xxviijvo in Essex' et Hertford'.

Summa feodorum xij. feoda octava et duodecima.

ESSEX AND HERTFORD.

II.267-270.

ESSEX.

Ricardus de Munfichet, vicecomes, Rogerus de Abiton' pro eo, reddit compotum de xv.l. xiiij.s. j.d. de xx. feodis, sexta et sexagesima parte unius feodi honoris de Clare in hoc comitatu;

Et de xij. feodis et dimidio et xxma parte unius feodi honoris Gloucestrie in hoc comitatu;

Et de xj. feodis honoris Warenne in hoc comitatu;

Et de xxxv. feodis et dimidio, decima et sexagesima parte unius feodi honoris Bononie in hoc comitatu, prefer unum feodum quod comes Oxonie tenet in Gilham ad feodi firmam;

Et de xij. feodis et sexta parte unius feodi comitis Oxonie in hoc comitatu;

Et de iij. feodis, iiijta et xxma parte unius feodi honoris de Helyun in hoc comitatu;

Et de xx. feodis et dimidio et quadragesima parte unius feodi de baronia Walteri filii Roberti in hoc comitatu;

Et de vj. feodis et dimidio honoris de Hagenet in hoc comitatu, qui est in manu domini regis;

Et de xiiij. feodis et dimidio et iiijta parte unius feodi honoris de Reilegh' in hoc comitatu;

Et de xix. feodis, iiijta et vjta parte unius feodi honoris Peverelli in hoc comitatu;

Et de v. feodis et dimidio et iiijta parte unius feodi honoris de Tany in hoc comitatu;

Et de xv. feodis et dimidio iiijta et xxma et lxma parte unius feodi de baronia episcopi Londoniensis in hoc comitatu;

Et de x. feodis et decima et nona parte unius feodi Margerie de Ripariis in hoc comitatu;

Et de iiijor feodis de honore de Reymes in hoc comitatu;

Et de iiijor feodis et dimidio et iiijta parte unius feodi de feodis honoris de Valoniis;

Et de iiijor feodis et dimidio Mauricii Rydel;

Et de v. feodis de feodis Henrici de Essex';

Et de dimidio feodo baronie de Kentewell';

Et de xma parte unius feodi Martini Camerarii in Stevinton';

ESSEX AND HERTFORD. 901

II.267-270 - cont.

Et de iiijta parte unius feodi Henrici Martel in Dunmawe;

Et de uno feodo et dimidio Mathei Loveyn;

Et de uno feodo et iiijta parte unius feodi Radulfi Gernun;

Et de j. feodo Walteri de Bibeswrthun in Salinges quod tenet de Waltero de Wyrminton';

Et de xma parte unius feodi Reginaldi de Dinesleg' et Willelmi de Gawyz, quam tenent de Waltero filio Bernardi in Bolemere;

Et de iiijta parte unius feodi Willelmi filii Warini in Bures;

Et de iij. partibus unius feodi comitis de Ferrariis in Wodeham;

Et de uno feodo comitis ejusdem in Ginges Laundry;

Et de tercia parte unius feodi Johannis de Cramavill' in Bromfeud';

Et de uno feodo Willelmi de Ferrariis in Stebbing';

Et de duabus partibus unius [1] Katerine que fuit uxor Radulfi le Bret in Sturmere de rege in capite;

Et de dimidio feodo Henrici de Cramavill' in Danesye;

Et de j. feodo Isabelle de Bras in Hatfeud' et Writel';

Et de dimidio feodo Edmundi de Kemesec in Magna Saumford';

Et de dimidio feodo Walteri del Acre in Saumford';

Et de viijta parte unius feodi Willelmi del Acre quam tenet de eodem Waltero;

Et de dimidio feodo Johannis de Nevill' in Hallingebur';

Et de j. feodo Henrici de Cramavill' in Renham;

Et de uno feodo Mathei Laven [2] in Eystan ad Turrim;

Et de v. feodis Warini de Monte Caniso que tenet de Waltero filio Roberti.

HERTFORD'.

Et de uno feodo Johannis de la Mare in Waldene;

Et de ij. feodis et dimidio honoris Bononie in hoc comitatu;

Et de iiijor feodis et dimidio et quinta parte unius feodi honoris de Valoniis in hoc comitatu;

Et de ix. feodis et dimidio de baronia episcopi Londoniensis in hoc comitatu;

Et de v. feodis et sexta parte unius feodi Galfridi de Scalariis;

Et de uno feodo et dimidio baronie Walteri filii Roberti in hoc comitatu;

Et de iiijor feodis Margerie de Ripariis in hoc comitatu;

Et de iij. feodis et dimidio et viijva parte unius feodi Hugonis Wake in hoc comitatu.

Summa [3] feodorum cclvij. feoda et dimidium, tercia et lma secunda pars j. feodi.

In thesauro cccxxxvij.l. vj.s. iiij.d. in septem talliis. Et debet clxxviij.l. vij.s. x.tl. De quibus respondet infra.


[1] After unius supply feodi.
[2] Read de Luvein.
[3] The true sum is 257+1/2+1/3+7/360 of a fee. It will be seen that 1/52, is the nearest fraction below 7/360 with 1 for numerator.

902 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.267-270 - cont.

Johannes de Warfelet', ballivus hundredi de Rocheford', reddit compotum de l.l. xj.s. de xviij. feodis et dimidio iiijta et xl. parte unius feodi honoris de Reyleg' in hoc hundredo; et de iij. feodis honoris de Valoniis, unde vicecomes respondet supra in eodem honore de ij. feodis, in Parva Sutton' et aliis hamelettis que Templarii tenent; et de dimidio feodo Margerie de Ripariis in hoc hundredo; et de dimidio feodo Walteri filii Roberti in hoc hundredo; et de dimidio feodo honoris de Clare in hoc hundredo.

In thesauro xxxviij.l. per v. tallias. Et debet xij.l. xj.s. Set respondet inde in magno rotulo xxvujvo in Essex' et Hertford'.

Isti habent quietanciam per brevia.

Johannes Maunsel de tercia parte unius feodi quam magister Rogerus de Cantilupo tenet in Tillebir' de Roberto de Tillebur'.

Ada que fuit uxor Johannis filii Roberti* *de * *feod' hundredi de Clavering' de eodem auxilio, set respondet inde in rotulo xxviijvo in Essex' et Hertford'.

Idem vicecomes reddit compotum de clxxviij.l. vij.s. x.d. sicut supra continetur. Et de xx.s. de dimidio feodo Willelmi le Rous de Bassingburn' de honore Bononie ibidem; et de xx.s. de dimidio feodo Willelmi de Kau in Mordon'; et de xx.s. de dimidio feodo Walteri de Leyc' in Gameling'; et de x.s. de iiijta parte unius feodi Wyclonis de Brescy in Mordon'; et de xl.s. de j. feodo Phllippi de Abbington' ibidem; et de xx.s. de dimidio feodo Nigelli de Gundevill' in* *; et de xx.s. de dimidio feodo Johannis le Moyne in Grantesete; et de xl.s. de uno feodo* *; et de x.s. de quinta et quadragesima parte unius feodi Johannis de Gamelingeye ibidem.

Summa ciiijxx vij.l. vij.s. x.d. De quibus in thesauro per predictum vicecomitem c.l. per iij. tallias et iiij.l. per fratres milicie Templi per j. talliam, et xx.s. per Johannem de Nevill' per j. talliam. Et debet vicecomes iiijxx iij.l. vij.s. x.d. Set respondet inde in magno rotulo xxviijo in Essex' et Hertford'. [1]

NORFOLK.

II.295-296.

FEODA MILITUM IN COMITATU NORFF' DE QUIBUS DOMINUS REX PERCIPIT SCUTAGIA CONTRA TRANSFRETACIONEM SUAM IN VASCONIA.

Feoda Walteri filii Roberti.

Henricus de Ferreres quartam partem feodi militis in Rudham de eodem.


[1] " Ricardus de Munfichet iiijxx et iij.l. vij.s. x.d. de auxilio ad transfretacionem regis in Wasconiam, sicut continetur in rotulo compotorum eiusdem auxilii.

" Johannes de Watflet xij.l. xj.s. de eodem auxilio, sicut continetur ibidem.

" Ada que fuit uxor Johannis filii Roberti de feodis hundredi de Clavering, sicut continetur ibidem." Pipe Roll, 28 Hen. III.

NORFOLK. 903

II.295-296 - cont.

Egidius de Mumpinchun ij. feoda militum in Riburg et Naringes de eodem.

Mabilia et Basilia fille Philippi de Naringes unum feodum in Naringes et in Stiberde de eodem.

Robertus Baynard unum feodum militis de eodem in Merton'.

Ernaldus de Munteny unum feodum militis in Sprouton', Gatton' de eodem.

Robertus Baynard de Riston' unum feodum militis et dimidium in Riston' de eodem.

Fulco de Kertheston' dimidium feodum militis in Riston' de eodem.

Henricus de Crostweyt et participes sui unum feodum militis in Crostweyt, Berton' et Tibeham de eodem.

Robertus de Schegton' et Claricia de Witewell' unum feodum militis in Schegton' de eodem.

Hugo filius Eustacii unum feodum militis in Tacolueston' de eodem.

Bartholomeus Malherbe unum feodum militis in Tacolueston' de eodem.

Simon filius Ricardi quarterium feodi militis in Tacolueston' de eodem.

Reginaldus de Duvedale dimidium feodum militis in Tacolueston' de eodem.

Johannes de Duvedale quarterium feodi militis in Tacolueston' de eodem.

Robertus Baynard unum feodum militis in Hadeston' de eodem.

Ricardus Curpeil dimidium quarterium feodi militis in Hemehal' de eodem.

Rogerus Curpeil quarterium feodi militis in Hemehal' de eodem.

Robertus de Capella xx. partem feodi militis in Hemehale de eodem.

Heres Walteri de Valeines quarterium feodi militis in Hemehale de eodem.

Thomas filius Roberti unum feodum militis in Weteacr' de eodem.

Thomas de Weteacr' unum feodum militis in Weteacr' de eodem.

Thomas filius Roberti unum feodum militis in Ravenigham de eodem.

Galfridus de Wafre tria quarteria feodi militis in Ravenigham de eodem.

Rogerus de Hales unum feodum militis in Kyrkeby, Hales de eodem.

Philippus Lohot unum feodum militis in Kirkeby et Ravenigham de eodem.

Thomas filius Roberti unum feodum militis in Schategrave de eodem.

Robertus Baynard et Agnes filia Philippi de Schategrave unum feodum militis in Schategrave de eodem.

Robertus de Hulmo dimidium feodum militis in Hulmo de eodem.

Thomas de Presseny unum feodum militis in Hulmo de eodem.

904 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.295-296 - cont.

Walterus Marescallus, Isabella [1] eius unum feodum militis in Estbradeham de eodem.

Nigellus de Risleye dimidiam feodum militis in Wiclewode de eodem.

Robertus filius Augeri dimidium feodum militis in Wiclewode de eodem.

Emma de Ideketorp' dimidium feodum in Ronhale de eodem.

Richerus de Wytewell' dimidium feodum in Ronhal' de eodem.

Baldewinus de Frivill' quarterium feodi militis in Welingham de eodem.

Robertus de Cokefeld' dimidium feodum militis in Wileby, Hapesbrugg' de eodem.

Rogerus Curpeil dimidium feodum in Stradesete, Fincham de eodem.

Rogerus de Aula de Boketon quartam partem feodi militis in Buketon' de eodem.

Rogerus Curpeil dimidium feodum militis in Berton' de eodem.

Roesia de Kertheston' unum feodum et dimidium militis in Kertheston' de eodem.

Willelmus de Clere dimidium feodum militis in Stirston' de eodem.

Ernaldus de Munteni unum feodum militis in Disce de eodem. Radulfus de Gimges quartam partem feodi unius militis in Disce de eodem.

Hamo Chevere quarterium feodi militis in Titeleshal', Godewyc, Wychingsete de eodem.

Walterus filius Roberti dimidium feodum militis in Boylund'. [1]

II.313-325.

Feoda Comitis Warenn'.

Johannes de Saues dimidium feodum militis in Geyste de eodem.

Willelmus de Hakeford' dimidium feodum militis in Hakeford' de eodem.

Baldewinus de Rosey unum feodum militis et quarterium in Houeton' de eodem.

Prior de Rokesford [3] ij. feoda militum iu Rudham, Marham, Geyton', Croft, Mortof, Salle, Bermere, Sithesterne et Heydon' de eodem.

Egidius de Mumpinchun ij. feoda militum in Riburg' et Naringes de eodem.

Willelmus de Grancurt unum feodum et dimidium militis in Fulmodeston' et Crokeston' de eodem.

Idem Willelmus quarterium feodi militis in Clipeston' de eodem.

Mabilia et Basilia filie Philippi de Naringes unum feodum militis in Stiberde, Crocston' et Parva Naringes de eodem.

Robertus Agellium dimidium feodum militis in Norbarsham de eodem.


[1] After Isabella supply uxor.
[2] At this point the entry is interrupted and new matter begins at the head of a new page, the first of a new quire. The entry is resumed on p. 313, the first page of a new quire. It is clear that the intervening quire is misplaced, [3] Read Kokesford.

NORFOLK. 906

II.313-325 - cont.

Radulfus filius Roberti Wylekyn unum feodum militis in Norbarsham de eodem.

Radulfus de Wanci unum feodum militis in Westbarsham de eodem.

Reginaldus de Sancto Martino unum feodum militis in Waterden', Estbarsham et Hemton' de eodem.

Johannes de Rosey xx. partem feodi militis in Suttrek' [1] de eodem.

Huge de Polstede et Willelmus de Gimingham dimidium feodum in Burnham Sutton' de eodem.

Hugo de Plaiz per heredem Radulfi de Burnham unum feodum militis et dimidium in Burnhamthorp' de eodem.

Rogerus de Schovill' dimidium feodum militis in Estherling' de eodem.

Robertus Malet x. partem feodi militis in Estherling' de eodem.

Willelmus de Lirlinge terciam partem feodi militis in Rischewrthe de eodem.

Radulfus filius Willelmi de Saxham et Radulfus de Snora dimidium feodum militis in Norton' de eodem.

Willelmus de Mortemer dimidium feodum militis in Schulton' de eodem.

Thomas Bacon dimidium feodum militis in Dalfinge de eodem.

Willelmus de Hakeford et Walterus de Rocheford' et socii sui tres partes feodi militis in Couteshal' de eodem.

Petrus de Auboys quartam partem feodi militis in Hautboys, Tutington' de eodem.

Rogerus de Wlterton' quartam partem feodi militis in Wlterton' de eodem.

Idem Rogerus x. partem feodi militis in Itringham et [2] Stutevill' de eodem.

Ricardus de Nerford' dimidium feodum militis in Wrenigham de eodem.

Robertus de Besevill' unum feodum militis in Hadeston' de eodem.

Petrus Branche ij. feoda militum in Gresham, Almerton' de eodem.

Rogerus de Ravenigham tria quarteria feodi militis in Ravenigham de eodem.

Adam de Kaely unum feodum militis in Hildeburwrthe de eodem.

Isabella de Hulmo quarterium feodi militis in Fileby de eodem.

Nigellus de Risley dimidium feodum militis in Morleye de eodem.

Robertus filius Radulfi dimidium feodum militis in Weleburne, Egemere de eodem.

Philipus de Verly dimidium feodum militis in Titeleshal' de eodem.

Rogerus de Frivill' unum feodum militis in Scheringham W. de Stutevill' de eodem.

Johannes de Hoe quarterium feodi militis in Hoe W. de Stutevill' de eodem.

Johannes de Sancto Claro quartam partem feodi militis in Westlechesham W. de Stutevill' de eodem.


[1] Read Sutorek.
[2] For et read W. de.

906 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.313-325 - cont.

Willelmus de Mortemer unum feodum militis in Atleburg', Bernham Parva Elingham et Toftes de eodem.

Baldewinus de Rosey unum feodum mllitis in Rokelund' de eodem.

Willelmus de Lirlinge terciam partem feodi militis in Lirlinge de eodem.

Robertus de Cateston' et Johannes de Rudham et participes eorum unum feodum militis in Rudham, Rokelund et Bekerton' de eodem.

Willelmus de Illington' et participes sui unum feodum militis in Illington' de eodem.

Robertus Agelliun et prior de Binham quartam partem feodi militis in Wyveton' et Salthus de eodem.

Robertus de Cokefeld' dimidium feodum in Sniterle de eodem.

Radulfus de Birston' dimidium feodum militis in Birston' de eodem.

Thomas de Ingaldesthorp' quartam partem feodi militis in Winebodesham de eodem.

Robertus de Denevere unum feodum militis in Fordham, Elegeye, Derham et Dunham de eodem.

Cecilia filia Philippi de Burnham dimidium feodum militis in Harpel' de eodem.

Willelmus de Gurney dimidium feodum militis in Harpel' de eodem.

Gerbertus de Sancto Claro quartam partem feodi militis in Grimeston' de eodem.

Willelmus de Cangham tres partes feodi militis in Cangham W. de Stutevill' de eodem.

Willelmus de Mortimer dimidium feodum militis in Stanford', Bukeham de eodem.

Osbertus de Mundeford' quarterium feodi militis in Mundeford de eodem.

Gilbertus de Walsham quarterium feodi militis in Norwalde de eodem.

Robertus Agelliun, Thomas de Ingaldesthorp' et Robertus de Scales unum feodum militis et dimidium in Wilton' et Hocwolde de eodem.

Osbertus de Mundeford quarterium feodi militis in Hocwolde de eodem.

Thomas de Ingaldesthorp' quarterium feodi militis in Snetesham de eodem.

Willelmus de Spinevill' dimidium feodum in Bermere de eodem.

Willelmus de Stutevill' unum feodum militis in Ausinge de eodem.

Samuelus Talebot ij. feoda militum in Fincham de eodem.

Philippus de Haskeby vtam partem feodi militis in Tunstall' de eodem.

Baldricus de Taverham unum feodum militis in Taverham et Drayton' de eodem.

Frethericus de Chervill' unum feodum militis in Castelacr' de eodem.

Adam de Raely unum feodum militis in Bernewic de eodem.

NORFOLK. 907

II.313-325 - cont.

Robertus de Kokefeld' unum feodum militis in Feltewell' de eodem.

Willelmus de Spinevill' dimidium feodum in Feltewell' de eodem.

Robertus de Denevere dimidium feodum in Lirlinge de eodem.

Johannes de Hoe quarterium feodi militis in Bikerston' et Bernham de eodem.

Alanus filius Willelmi de Helgeton' xx. partem feodi militis in Helgeton' de eodem.

Johannes de Hoe dimidium feodum militis in Fingham de eodem.

Margeria de Poning unum feodum militis in Denevere de eodem.

Osbertus de Mundeford' vtam partem feodi militis in Reymereston' de eodem.

Feoda Comitis de Clara.

Radulfus de Langecot vjtam partem feodi militis in Norton' de eodem.

Johannes de Norton' unum feodum militis in Norton' de eodem.

Simon filius Ricardi unum feodum militis in Penestorp' de eodem.

Hugo de Stivekeye terciam partem feodi militis in Trexston' de eodem.

Bartholomeus de Stivekeye unum feodum militis in Stivekeye de eodem.

Hugo de Stivekeye unum feodum militis in Stivekeye de eodem.

Willelmus filius Petri dimidium feodum in Stivekeye de eodem.

Comes de Clara tria feoda militum in Walsingham de eodem.

Willelmus Angevin, Ricardus de Holmford', Rolandus de Rumely unum feodum militis et dimidium in Magna Walsingham de eodem.

Henricus de Hemesby et Robertus le Blund quartam partem feodi militis in Ingewrthe de eodem.

Ricardus de Hadesco viij. partem feodi militis in Taseburgh' de eodem.

Galfridus de Say quarterium feodi militis in Stratton' de eodem.

Heredes Rogeri de Greyneston' unum feodum militis in Greyneston' de eodem.

Willelmus filius Roberti quartem partem feodi militis in Bukeham de eodem.

Petrus Jordan viij. partem feodi militis in Leringsete de eodem.

Richerus de Docking' unum feodum militis et dimidium in Wiveton' de eodem.

Reginaldus Bacon viij. partem feodi militis in Leringsete de eodem.

Adam de Kalethorp' et Johannes de Reppes et Reginaldus Bacon unum feodum militis in Bayford' de eodem.

Simon de Bodham dimidium feodum militis in Bodham de eodem.

Petrus Jordan viij. partem feodi militis in Hevingham de eodem.

Ricardus filius Ricardi unum feodum militis et dimidium in Brecham de eodem.

Ricardus de Vilethe dimidium feodum militis in Parva Ringestede de eodem.

908 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.313-325 - cont.

Johannes Loverd quarterium feodi militis in Magna Ringestede de eodem.

Godselmus de Vertum' quartam partem feodi militis in Karleton' de eodem.

Robertus de Norff' dimidium quarterium feodi militis in Karleton' de eodem.

Bartholomeus de Stivekeye quartem partem feodi militis in Sutpikeham de eodem.

Henricus filius Rogeri terciam partem feodi militis et xam partem feodi in Warham de eodem.

Prior de Walsingham quarterium feodi militis in Salle de eodem.

Henricus le Chat viij. partem feodi militis in Hevingham de eodem.

Godefridus de Irninglond' terciam partem feodi militis in Irminglond' de eodem.

Heredes Willelmi Buteri dimidium feodum militis in Parva Reynham de eodem.

Petrus et Galfridus de Threkeston' terciam partem feodi militis in Threkeston' de eodem.

Robertus de Kelling' ij. partes feodi militis in Kelfing' de eodem.

Feoda Honoris de Wirmegeye.

Ricardus filius Galfridi tria quarteria feodi militis in Crek', Norbarsham, et Houeton' de eodem.

Willelmus de Riseby dimidium feodum militis in Brunhamtorp' de eodem.

Walterus filius Gilberti dimidium feodum militis in Thorp' de eodem.

Johannes Norman vj. partem feodi militis in Grimeston' de eodem.

Reginaldus filius Edmundi x. partem feodi militis in Geyton' de eodem.

Frethericus de Ehervill' [1] ij. feoda in Tilneye, Wigehale de eodem.

Willelmus filius Herlewin' quarterium feodi militis in Tirington' de eodem.

Hamo de Nerburg' quarterium feodi militis in Tirington' de eodem.

Ricardus de Stratton' et participes sui quarterium feodi militis in Tirington' de eodem.

Alanus Ruffus dimidium feodum in Estlechesham de eodem.

Robertus de Elingham ij. feoda in Magna Elingham de eodem.

Willelmus filius Willelmi de Watlington' unum feodum militis in Watlington' cum pertinenciis de eodem.

Nicholaus de Sibeton' ix. partes feodi militis in Thorpland' de eodem.

Ricardus de Tunewrthe quarterium feodi militis in Derham, Sechiche de eodem.

Willelmus Luvel unum feodum militis in Berton' de eodem.

Walramus de [2] Tyheys et participes sui unum feodum militis in Fincham de eodem.


[1] Read Chervill'.
[2] Read le.

NORFOLK. 909

II.313-325 - cont.

Galfridus Curpel dimidium feodum militis in Fincham, Derham, Fordham de eodem.

Robertus de Stradesete unum feodum militis in Stradesete, Fordham* *Riston' et Watlington' de eodem.

Alexander Moyne unum feodum militis in Fodeston', Wrenigham * *et Watlington' de eodem.

Robertus de Kokefeld' dimidium feodum militis in Escudeham [1] de eodem.

Hamo de Nerburg' dimidium feodum militis in Nerburg' de eodem.

Hugo Buche dimidium feodum in Narburgh' de eodem.

Feoda Honoris de Hagenet.

Hugo de Polstede, Willelmus de Gimingham ij. feoda militum in Burnham de eodem.

Thomas de Ingaldesthorp' et Robertus de Schales ij. feoda militum in Renham de eodem.

Willelmus de Bodham ij. feoda militum in Sutcrek' de eodem.

Petrus de Pelevill' dimidium feodum militis in Walton', Bilneye de eodem.

Willelmus* *j. feodum militis in Bodham de eodem.

Ricardus de Burfeld' vj. partem feodi militis in Stauneford' de eodem.

Filia Walteri de Marham unum feodum militis in Marham de eodem.

Robertus de Schales dimidium feodum militis pro terra de Herdwic', * *Nudebonue [2] de eodem.

* *unum feodum militis et tria quarteria in Gatel' de eodem.

Thomas de Inland' quarterium feodi militis in Gatele de eodem.

Philippus Basset ij. feoda militum in Boston', Runton' de eodem.

Feoda de Ry que Alina Marescalla tenet.

Baldricus de Taverham quintam partem feodi militis in Tunstall' de eodem.

Matheus de Morley ij. feoda militum in Wiclewode, Berford', Morley de eodem.

Thomas de Bacunthorp' quarterium feodi militis in Depham de eodem.

Thomas de Hartham unum feodum militis in Hartham de eodem.

Fulco de Kercheston' quarterium feodi militis in Neuton' de eodem.

Johannes filius Petri dimidium feodum militis in Scropham de eodem.

Agnes Lemveyse, Thomas filius Baldewini, Rogerus le Estraunge et Reginaldus de Dunham unum feodum militis in Scheringhe, Wauton' et Wlterton' de eodem.


[1] Read Estudeham.
[2] The missing name, may be Lenn. Nudebonue may be an error for Mideltone.

910 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.313-326 - cont.

Matheus de Morleye unum feodum militis in Reydon' de eodem.

Reginaldus le Gros unum feodum militis in Slahele, Lammesse, Schothog', Tudeham de eodem.

Feoda Abbatis Sancti Benedicti.

Tiffonia de Kardvll dimidium feodum militis in Saxllngham de eodem.

Willelmus de Stalham decimam partem feodi militis in Stalham * *Beston', Irstede de eodem.

Willelmus filius Willelmi de Kaletorp' xam partem feodi militis in Bestun' de eodem.

Philippus filius Petri unum feodum militis in Wrthestede de eodem.

Rogerus de Goneton' tria quarteria feodi mllitis in Haniges de eodem.

Petrus de Hauboys et Willelmus de Caletorp' dimidium feodum militis in Kaletorp', Herpingham de eodem.

Idem Petrus xvam partem feodi militis in Hauboys de eodem.

Rogerus de Wltertun' quartam partem feodi militis in Wltertun' de eodem.

Stephanus de Redham vtam partem feodi militis in Redham de eodem.

Feoda Sancti Edmundi respondent in rotulo prelatorum.

Willelmus de Wridewell' xv. partem feodi militis in Snareshill' de eodem.

Maria de Cham et participes sui unum feodum mllitis in Kyrkeby, Elingham et Geldestun' de eodem.

Gilbertus de Hoe ij. partes feodi militis in Hoe de eodem.

Gilbertus de Walsham et participes sui unum feodum militis in Lodnes,* [1]*Thewit, Brom de eodem.

Egidius de Wacheshesham [2] dimidium feodum militis in Marlingford' de eodem.

Thomas filius Godardi terciam partem feodi militis in Middelton' de eodem.

Willelmus filius Radulfi de Bukeham dimidium feodum militis in Bukeham de eodem.

Thomas de Hastinges ij. partes feodi militis in Gissinge de eodem.

Robertus de Gissinge unum feodum militis in Reydon', Gissinge de eodem.

Willelmus de Hakeford' ij. partes feodi militis in Westherling' de eodem.

Johannes de Verdun unum feodum militis in Brisingham de eodem.

Wyona de Verdun et participes sui unum feodum in Brisingham et Hapetun' de eodem.

Robertus de Bosco unum feodum militis in Ferffeld' de eodem.

Hugo Burd' dimidium feodum militis in Mendham de eodem.


[1] Supply Mundham.
[2] Read Wachesham,

NORFOLK. 911

II.313-325 - cont.

Feoda Margerie de Ripariis.

Radulfus de Cnulle [1] unum feodum militis in Intewde de eadem.

Alexander de Rohinges dimidium feodum militis in Brethenham de eodem. [2]

Simon filius Simonis ifij. feoda militum in Holt, Claya et Bayfeld' de eodem.

Rogerus de Pereres unum feodum militis in Holt de eodem.

Ernaldus de Thorleye unum feodum militis in Leringsete de eodem.

Hamo de Hemstede unum feodum in Hemstede de eodem.

Feoda de Melham de Johanne filio Roberti [3] Alani.

Willelmus filius Johannis de Plumstede iiij. partem feodi militis in Plumstede de eodem.

Alicia Arsic dimidium feodum militis in Sutacra de eodem.

Thomas filius Roberti de Ravenigham et participes sui unum feodum militis in Sutacr' de eodem.

Willelmus de Bello Monte et participes sui quarterium feodi militis in Estweniz de eodem.

Alicia Arsic cfimidium feodum militis in Magna Dunham de eodem.

Johannes le Estrange quarterium feodi militis et dimidium quarterium in Lugham de eodem.

Willelmus de Bures unum feodum militis in Laningham, Titeleshal', et Wesenham de eodem.

Johannes le Estrange quarterium feodi militis et dimidium quarterium in Hulmo, Hunstanston' et Hoverbrok' de eodem.

Johannes filius Alani iiij. partem feodi militis in Sutwde de eodem.

Feoda Honoris Peverelli.

Galfridus Tregoz ij. partes feodi militis in Billingford' de eodem.

Petrus de Mendinges iiij. partem feodi militis in Redleswrth' de eodem.

Matheus Peverel iiij. feoda militum in Magna Melton', Brakene et Keteringham, Karletun' et Riveshale de eodem.

Feoda David Cumin.

Agnes de Ratlesden' ij. feo [4] feoda militum in Geystweyt, Dalfinge, Parva Riburg' et Saxlingham de eodem.

Thomas de Grimeston' terciam partem feodi militis in Testertun' et Halcham de eodem.

Johannes de Bretton' et Egidius de Mumpinchun j. feodum militis in Ingaldesthorp' de eodem.

Feoda que tenentur de domino rege in capite.

Thomas la Veleye iiij. partem feodi militis in Pischel' et Witton de domino rege.


[1] Read Tiville.
[2] Read eadem here and also in the remaining fees of this group.
[3] Omit Roberti.
[4] Omit feo.

912 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.313-325 - cont.

Willelmus de Cahu unum feodum militis in Witton de domino rege.

Radulfus de Bella Fago dimidium feodum in Sutcrek' de domino rege.

Raul' filius Roberti dimidium feodum mllitis in Houton' de domino rege.

Radulfus de Camoys quarterium feodi militis in Hardingham de domino rege.

Johannes Marescallus unum feodum mllitis in Hengham de domino rege.

Johannes Luvel unum feodum militis in Dockinge, Sutmere et Tichewell', de domino rege.

Rogerus filius Ricardi de Sancto Dioniaio dimidium feodum militis in Hemstede de domino rege.

Feoda diversorum.

Herveus filius Hugonis filii Hervei quarterium feodi militis in Geyton' de Dovr'.

Petrus de Monasteriis et participes sui dimidium feodum militis in Randeswrth', Huptun', Walsham et Wichamton' de Alicia que fuit uxor Rogeri de Clara de Strumesuage.

Walterus Strut viij. partem feodi militis in Tilneye de herede Thome de Burgo.

Bartholomeus filius Wydonis de Tilneye viij. partem feodi militis in Tilneye de herede Thome de Burgo.

Hamo de Patesi' quarterium feodi militis in Patesi' de Ricardo de Box.

Willelmus filius Rogeri dimidium feodum militis in Rokelund' de domina de Angre.

Ricardus de Cauhz dimidium feodum militis in Scropham de feodo eiusdem.

Henricus Freman et participes sui terciam partem feodi militis in Mouton' de Radulfo de Chamoys.

Matillis de Rocheford' quartam partem feodi militis in Kyrkeby de herede de Bydun'.

Willelmus de Anemere xxv. partem feodi militis de Willelmo de Benefeld'.

Matillis de Rocheford' dimidium feodum militis in Stowe et Tumeston' de feodo de Bydun.

Thomas de Babbingle unum feodum militis in Babbingele de Waltero filio Bernardi.

Baldewinus de Burgate quarterium feodi militis in Crucestoke * * de feodo Gilberti Pecche.

Alicia de Frosteden' dimidium feodum militis in Saxlingham de Willelmo de Vescy.

Ernaldus de Torleye dimidium feodum militis in Westweniz de Simone filio Ricardi filii Simonis.

Alicia Danmartin dimidium feodum militis in Strumeshag'.

NORFOLK. 913

II.313-325 - cont.

DE SERIANTIIS.

Henricus de Hauvill' tenet terram suam in Melgetun' et Reynham de rege per seriantiam falconarie.

Henricus de Hauvill' tenet terram de domino rege in Ketelleston' per seriantiam falconarie.

Henricus de Hastinges tenet Aschele de domino rege per seriantiam panetrie.

Willelmus le May tenet terram in Causton' et Stanhog' de domino rege per seriantiam custodiendi unum limarium.

Radulfus de Herleham tenet quartam partem ville de Oxewic de comite Warenne per seriantiam mutandi unum asturcum.

Bartholomeus de Chalers [sic Avilers] tenet quandam terram in Schelhangel de domino rege per seriantiam ducendi pedites in Walliam.

Willelmus de Curchum et Willelmus filius Radulfi de Karleton' tenent terras suas in Karleton' per seriantiam deferendi c. alleces in pane ad dominum regem ubicunque fuerit in Anglia.

Rogerus Bygot, comes Norff', tenet terram que fuit Huberti Cordebof in Banigham et Erpingham per servicium inveniendi unum servientem cum lancia ad servicium domini regis.

Idem comes tenet quandam partem terre que fuit Walteri Tusard in dictis villis per seriantiam inveniendi ad servicium domini regis unum balistarium.

Hugo de Burdele tenet terram suam in Schulton' per seriantiam serviendi in lardario domini regis.

Radulfus de Herlham tenet partem terre sue in Herlham per seriantiam baliste in castro Norwici.

Warinus de Redenhal' tenet terram suam in Redenhale per seriantiam mutandi unum asturcum domini regis et deferendi tempore suo.

SUFFOLK.

II.325-330.

FEODA MILITUM IN COMITATU SUFF' DE QUIBUS DOMINUS REX RERCIPIT SCUTAGIA CONTRA TRANSFRETACIONEM SUAM IN VASCONIAM.

De feodis Gilberti Pecche.

Stephanus de Haredis, Michael de Neuton', Rogerus de Colevill', Ricardus de Wicot, Willelmus filius et heres Roberti de Fraxneto tenent feodum unius militis de eodem Gilberto de Pecche.

Robertus de Demeford' tenet unum feodum in Demeford' de eodem.

Willelmus filius Roberti de Fraxneto tenet unum feodum in Richemere de feodo eiusdem.

Gilbertus Pecche tenet unum feodum in Bering'.

Willelmus Breton tenet feodum militis in Corneye de feodo eiusdem.

De feodis Honoris de Clare.

Galfridus de Baddele tenet unum feodum militis in Badele de eodem honore.

914 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.325-330 - cont.

Sewale de Ringleshal' dimidium feodum militis in Ringleshal' de eodem.

Willelmus Talemache quartam partem militis in Parva Brisete de eodem.

Walterus de Hatfeld' quartam partem militis in Hays de eodem.

Johannes de Docking' terciam partem militis in Helmingham de eodem.

Galfridus de Badele dimidium feodum militis in Streston' de eodem.

Philippus de Freston' dimidium feodum militis in eadem de eodem.

+Winnes'+ Visdelu duas partes militis in Scottel' de eodem.

Walkelinus filius Roberti tenet unum feodum militis in Alwarton' de eodem.

Adam de Gedding' tenet feodum unius militis in Hetcham et Tunstall' de eodem.

Feoda Margerie de Ripariis.

Brianus de Ringeshal' tenet feodum dimidii militis in Ringeshal' de eadem comitissa.

Robertus de Willakesham unum feodum militis in Ringeshal' de feodo ipsius.

Galfridus de Ambely dimidium feodum militis in Sumeresham de eadem.

Galfridus de Ambely quartam partem militis in Neuton' de eadem.

Gilbertus de Bolebec tenet vj. partem militis in Hertstede de eadem.

Robertus de Vallibus tenet quartam partem militis in Wenham de feodo eiusdem.

De feodis Walteri filii Roberti.

Rogerus de Cressy tenet feodum unius militis in Reydon' de eodem Waltero.

Camilla de Wangeford' tenet unum feodum militis in Henham de eodem.

Thomas de Cravene dimidium feodum militis in Henham de eodem.

Willelmus de Brampton' et participes sui tenent unum feodum militis in Brampton' de feodis eiusdem.

Alicia de Frosteden' tenet unum feodum in Frosteden' de eodem.

Johannes filius Roberti dimidium feodum militis in Hubbeston' de eodem.

Comes Rogerus tenet dimidium feodum in Cratefeld' de feodo eiusdem Walteri.

Ernaldus de Monteny feodum militis in Torneye de eodem.

De feodis de Honore de Hageberet. [1]

Philippus de Columbers tenet dimidium feodum militis in Batesford' de eodem honore.


[1] Read Hagenet.

SUFFOLK. 916

II.325-330 - cont.

Idem Philippus tenet dimidium feodum militis in Benigham, Hacolt de eodem.

Johannes de Hotot tenet quarterium feodi militis in Torneye de eodem.

Rogerus de Boyton' xam partem militis in Neuton' de eodem.

Radulfus Juvenis tenet dimidium feodum in Gretingham de eodem.

Robertus de Eschales unum feodum militis in Wetherden' de eodem.

Feoda de Honore de Lancastria.

Willelmus de Aula tenet dimidium feodum in Cleydon' de eodem honore.

Ricardus le Butiler tenet quarterium militis in Cullo de eodem honore.

Johannes de Wachesham tenet quarterium in Culpho de eodem.

Arnaldus de Oteleye unum feodum militis in Oteleye de eodem.

Rogerus le Esturmi de Ikene unum feodum militis in Ikene de eodem.

Idem Rogerus tenet unum feodum in Bukeshal' de eodem.

Ricardus filius Anselmi vij. partem militis in Neuton' de eodem.

Johannes de Mungeden' dimidium feodum in Mungedon' de eodem honore.

De feodis de Honore Peverelli.

Matillis filia Egidii de Merk' et participes sui tenent dimidium feodum militis in Codeham de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Anhus tres partes feodi militis in Anhus de eodem.

Feoda de Angre.

Willelmus de Henleye unum feodum militis in Henleye de eodem.

Prior de Leghes tenet quartam partem militis in Wenham de eodem in puram et perpetuam elemosinam.

De feodis de Honore de Relege.

Prior Sancti Petri de Gipwico unum feodum militis in Pamton' de eodem honore.

Willelmus de Stratford' unum feodum militis in Stratford' de eodem.

Robertus de Alneto dimidium feodum militis in Stratford' de eodem.

Radulfus Camerarius quartam partem feodi militis in Wippeshog' de eodem.

De Honore de Cestr'.

Rogerus de Mohaut tenet duo feoda militum in Kessingland' et Carleton' de eodem.

Idem Rogerus tenet tria feoda militum in Framesden' et Pethag de eodem.

916 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.325-330 - cont.

Edmundus de Saterleye unum feodum militis in Soterle de eodem.

Ricardus de Argentem unum feodum in Halesworth' de eodem.

De feodis Comitis Oxonie.

Ricardus de Braham dimidium feodum militis in Boyton' de eodem comite.

Matheus de Peiton' unum feodum militis in Peiton' de eodem.

Petrus de Burgate duo feoda militum in Burgate de eodem.

De feodis Abbatis Sancti Edmundi extra fibertatem; set respondet in rotulo prelatorum.

Walterus de Schelhangel quartam partem militis in Huggechale de eodem abbate.

Robertus filius Willelmi de Alneto unum feodum militis in Anhus et Wetherden' de eodem.

Osbertus de Dagewrth' unum feodum militis in Randeston' de eodem.

Egidius de Wachesham quarterium feodi militis in Wrtham de eodem.

Johannes de Cramavill' et participes sui tria quarteria feodi militis in Hatle de eodem.

Hamo de Falsham dimidium feodum militis in Mikelefeld' de eodem.

Gilbertus de Walsham unum feodum in Mendham de eodem.

De feodis que tenentur de domino Rege in capite.

Willelmus Talebot unum feodum militis in Hintlesham de rege in capite.

Hugo Talemache dimidium feodum militis in Benetleye, Coppedhak' de rege.

Thomas de Hemegrave unum feodum militis in Mutford' de rege.

De diversis honoribus.

Walkelinus Vis de Lu tenet unum feodum militis in Schottele de Humfrido de Vis de Lu, et ipse de rege.

Osbertus de Dagewrth' quarterium feodi militis in Dagewrth' de feodis Henrici de Essex'.

Willelmus de Fraxneto quartam partem militis in Parva Drisete [1] de Briano Lewer.

Idonia de Beck' dimidium feodum militis in Swinelande de honore de Windleshoveres.

DE SERIANTIIS.

Bartholomeus de Nulers [2] tenet seriantiam ducendi pedites in Walliam pro terra sua in Werstede, Brom.

Johannes de Cordebof tenet c. solidatas terre in Mendlesham, Brocford' et Wicham per seriantiam balistarie.


[1] Read Brisete.
[2] Read Avilers.

SUFFOLK. 911

II.325-330 - cont.

Edmundus de Brompton' tenet terram in Hemeleston' per seriantiam die Natali Domini per sifflum, saltum et pettum.

Gilbertus de Weseham tenet Burg' per seriantiam balistarie.

II.330-336.

Inquisicio facta in libertate Sancti Edmundi de feodis militum per subscriptos, scilicet Galfridum le Vileyn de Sumerton', Gilbertum filium Clerici de Polstede, Godewinum de Cavenedis, Petrum de Aldham, Johannem filium Willelmi de Stanton', Robertum le Ercediekene, Wimerum de Heppeworth', Johannem filium Roberti de Thurston', Willelmum filium Ricardi de Ikelingham, Petrum de Grenefeld', Willelmum Everard' et Johannem Ilger.

Feoda que tenentur de domino Rege in capite.

Henricus de Schelton' tenet tria feoda in Illeye de domino rege in capite.

Matheus de Leyham et Nesta uxor eius tenent j. feodum in Esinton' similiter de rege.

Stephanus de Langeton' tenet quartam partem unius feodi in Bures de domino rege.

Johannes de Hudehovill' [1] tenet unum feodum in Aketon'.

Hugo Talemache tenet dimidium feodum in eadem villa.

Willelmus de Feypo, custos terre et heredis Hamonis de Clerbek', tenet dimidium feodum in eadem villa.

Matheus de Luvayn tenet unum feodum in Bildeston'.

Andreas de Helyun tenet dimidium feodum in Haverhelle.

Feoda que tenentur de Honore de Lancastr'.

Rogerus de Muryeus tenet unum feodum in Torp' de Radulfo de Arderna, et Radulfus de honore de Lancastr'.

Willelmus de Hastinges tenet unum feodum in eadem villa de Willelmo de Albervill' de eodem honore.

Willelmus filius Hervici tenet dimidium feodum in Boxsted' de eodem honore.

Basilla de Otteleye tenet dimidium feodum in Preston' de codem honore.

Robertus de Cokefeld' tenet dimidium feodum in Waudingef de eodem honore.

Robertus le Bretun tenet unum feodum in Riseby de Thoma Gresley, et Thomas de eodem honore.

Feoda de Honore Bolonie.

Willelmus de Criketot tenet unum feodum in Uuesden.

Willelmus de Roffec' tenet duo feoda in Ereswell'.

Johannes le Moyne et Willelmus de Appellord' tenent dimidium feodum in Elveden'.


[1] Read Hudebovill'.

918 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.330-336 - cont.

Alicia que fuit uxor Rogeri de Clare tenet unum feodum in Norton' de Hugone de Vivon', et Hugo de eodem honore.

Feoda de Honore de Releye.

Robertus de Stok' tenet quintam partem unius feodi in Stok' de Thoma de Plumberwe, et Thomas de honore de Releye.

Radulfus Camerarius tenet sextam partem unius feodi in eadem villa de eodem honore.

Thomas de Plumber' tenet xij. partem unius feodi in eadem villa de eodem honore.

Robertus, de Rokele tenet xij. partem unius feodi in eadem villa de eodem honore.

Hugo de Polstede tenet duo feoda in Polstede et tres partes unius feodi de eodem honore.

Walterus de Horkeleye tenet unum feodum in Wisinton' de eodem honore.

Feoda que tenentur de Margeria de Rivers de Honore de Angre.

Galfridus de Ambly tenet dimidium feodum militis et dimidii de domina de Angr' in Elmesete.

Matheus de Leyham tenet unum feodum militis de eadem in Leyham.

Johannes de Coteham tenet duo feoda in Tudeham de Matheo de Leyham, et Matheus de domina de Angre.

Robertus de Haustede tenet unum feodum in Sumerton' de Radulfo Gernun, et Radulfus tenet de domina de Angre.

Feoda de Clare que sunt in manu domini Regis.

Gilbertus Pecche tenet unum feodum in Dalham de Clare.

Willelmus Mauveysin tenet dimidium feodum de eodem Gilberto et Comite Ricardo.

Alicia de Hauvill' tenet dimidium feodum de Henrico de Hasting', et Henricus de Clare.

Robertus de Thalewrth' tenet feodum unius militis et dimidii in Wrettinge de Clare.

Johannes filius Lamberti tenet terciam partem unius feodi in Stokes.

Hugo filius Ade tenet quintam partem unius feodi in Pollingewrth' de Radulfo filio Willelmi, et Radulfus de Clare.

Robertus Darnel tenet terciam partem unius feodi de heredibus Roberti de Alwarton', et heredes ipaius Roberti de Radulfo filio Willelmi, et Radulfus de Clare.

Petrus de Hauekedon' tenet dimidium feodum in Hauekedon' de Johanne de Kersimera, et Johannes de Clare.

Robertus Hovel tenet xxa,n partem unius feodi in Whepstede de Clare.

Robertus de Sancto Germano tenet unum feodum in Cavenedia de honore de Clare.

SUFFOLK. 919

II.330-336 - cont.

Idem Robertus tenet duas partes unius feodi in Neuton' de Thoma de Evereus, et Thomas de Clare.

Nicholaus Pecche tenet sextam partem unius feodi in Hertherst de Gilberto Pecche, et Gilbertus de Clare.

Radulfus filius Willelmi tenet dimidium feodum in Waudingef' de honore de Clare.

Angot de Cornerth' tenet quartam partem unius feodi in Cornerth' de Galfrido de Bacheswrth', et Galfridus de Clare.

Feoda Comitis Warenne.

Rogerus de Ratlesden' tenet dimidium feodum in Ratlesden' de Hugone de Playz, et Hugo de comite Warenne.

Alicia que fuit uxor Willelmi de Creppinges tenet octavam partem unius feodi in Wainford' de Bartholomeo de Stanham, et Bartholomeus de comite Warenne.

Johannes de Seyncler et Ricardus de Crungelthorp' tenent dimidium feodum in Elvedon' de Petro de Kenet, et Petrus de comite Warenne.

Petrus filius Ricardi et Edmundus de Suheth tenent dimidium feodum de eodem Petro in Berton' et Haringwell', et Petrus de comite Warenne.

Willelmus de Wadington' tenet terciam partem unius in Bernham de Hugone de Playz, et Hugo de comite Warenne.

Willelmus de Stutevill' tenet dimidium feodum in Wytheresfeld' de comite Warenne.

Petrus Giffard tenet dimidium feodum militis in Wykham de Willelmo de Albo Monasterio, et Willelmus de comite Warenne.

Radulfus de Wauncy tenet duo feoda in Depeden' de comite Warenne.

Feoda Magistri Willelmi de Kentewell'.

Sarra de Knapwell' tenet dimidium feodum militis in Tudeham de Willelmo de Kentewell', et Willelmus de domino rege.

Robertus de Scales et Robertus le Fraunceys tenent unum feodum in Wridelincton' de eodem Willelmo, et Willelmus de domino lege.

Matheus de Telnetham [1] tenet unum feodum in Telvetham de Rogero de Cressy, et Rogerus de dicto Willelmo, et Willelmus de domino rege.

Robertus de Wheluetham [2] tenet dimidium feodum in Preston' de eodem Willelmo, et Willelmus de domino rege.

Feoda de Honore de Valeynes.

Nicholaus de Sancto Edmundo tenet dimidium feodum militis in Berdewell' de Petro de Maune, et Petrus de honore de Valeynes.

Robertus filius Ivonis tenet xiij. partem feodi unius in Gnateshal' de Thoma de Baddingele, et Thomas de Waltero filio Bernardi, et Walterus de Petro de Maune, et Petrus de honore de Valeynes.

David Cumyn tenet unum feodum in Torp' et in Pakeham de codem honore.


[1] Read Telvetham. See Domesday.
[2] Read Whelnetham.

920 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.330-336 - cont.

Feoda de Honore Glovernie.

Robertus de Cokefeld' tenet unum feodum in Muletun' de honore Glovernie.

Magister Radulfus de Ayneus tenet unum feodum militis in eadem villa de eodem honore.

Feoda Walteri filii Roberti.

Ilgerus filius Thome et Willelmus Fauvel tenent unum feodum in Simplinge de Waltero filio Roberti, et Walterus de domino rege.

Hugo Pecche et Matillis de Hemehal' tenent sextam partem in Kediton' et Bemardeston' de dicto Waltero, et Walterus de domino rege.

Hamo Chevre tenet tria quarteria et dimidium in Wykedeho de eodem Waltero, et Walterus de domino rege.

Rogerus de Poslingwrth' tenet unum quarterium militis in Poslingwrth' de Henrico de Hasting', et Henricus de dicto Waltero, et Walterus de domino rege.

Thomas de Presseny tenet unum feodum militis in Stanefeld' de dicto Waltero, et Walterus de domino rege.

Adam de Horningesherth tenet dimidium feodum in Bermingeham de Henrico de Essex', et Henricus de Waltero filio Roberti, et Walterus de domino rege.

Feoda Hugonis de Veer, Comitis Oxonie.

Thomas de Laveham tenet dimidium feodum in Laveham de comite Oxonie, et comes de domino rege.

Galfridus Carbunel tenet unum feodum et dimidium in Wandingef' [1] de comite Oxonie, et comes de domino rege.

Johannes de Hudebovill' tenet unum quarterium militis in Dunham de Waltero de Capell', et Walterus de comite Oxonie, et comes de domino rege.

Feoda de Honore de Wyrmengeye.

Willelmus de Verly tenet sextam partem unius feodi in Euston' de Willelmo Bardull, et Willelmus de honore de Wyrmengeye.

Custodes terre et heredis Radulfi de Bemers tenent dimidium feodum in Ikelingeham de Isabella de Brus, et Isabella de domino rege.

Ricardus de Ros tenet dimidium feodum in Hadleye de Willelmo de Byneford', et Willelmus de archiepiscopo Cantuariensi.

Willelmus filius Walteri tenet quartam partem unius feodi in Bures de Radulfo Gernun, et Radulfus de Willelmo de Reynes, et Willelmus de domino rege.

Willelmus de Brora tenet unum quarterium feodi in Hopeton' de comite de Arundell', et comes de domino rege.


[1] Read Waudingefeld.

CAMBRIDGE AND HUNTINGDON. 921

S.ij.24.II.587-592.

ROTULUS DE FEODIS MILITUM QUI BREVIA NON TULERUNT AD HABENDUM SCUTAGIUM IN COMITATIBUS CANTEBRIGIE ET HUNTEDONIE.

Baronia Hugonis de Ver, Comitis Oxonie.

Reginaldus Arsik tenet in Selverle feoda ij. militum.

Emma de Lega tenet in Hemmingeford et Gillinge feoda iij. militum.

Henricus de Bello Campo tenet in Sexton' feodum j. militis.

Thomas de Laveham tenet in Sexton' feodum j. militis.

Willelmus Thalemasch' tenet in Wilburgeham feodum j. militis.

Martinus Camerarius tenet in Wilburgeham feodum dimidii militis.

Robertus de Gisnes tenet in Asle feodum j. militis.

Heredes Johannis le Daeys tenent in Hildrichesham feodum j. militis.

Hugo comes de Ver tenet manerium de Campes et Abiton' in capite de domino rege in communa baronie sue.

[Johannes de Vallibus tenet in Sneilwell' feodum j. militis de baronia Willelmi de Percy.] (Cancelled.) Quia habet breve.

Henricus de Lunchamp tenet in Eltesle tres partes feodi j. mllitis de baronia de Munbray.

Baronia Gilberti Pech'.

Gilbertus Pech' tenet manerium de Brunne de domino rege in capite in communa baronie sue.

Elena de Bech' tenet in Mordun' feodum dimidii militis.

Elena de Bech' tenet in Winepol' feodum j. militis.

Elena de Bech' tenet in Toft feodum dimidii militis.

Elena de Beche tenet in Bech' feodum dimidii militis.

Robertus Mile tenet in Brunne feodum dimidii militis.

Sibilla de Crauden' tenet in Crauden' feodum j. militis.

Radulfus de Banc' tenet in Mordun' feodum dimidii militis.

Willelmus de Wichenton' tenet in Mordun' feodum dimidii militis.

Johannes de Bech' tenet in Mordun' feodum dimidii militis.

Willelmus Pichard tenet in Mordun' feodum dimidii militis.

Galfridus de Banc' tenet in Kingeston', Everesdon' et Winepol feoda iij. militum.

Johannes de Coteham tenet in Cumberton' feodum j. militis.

Johannes de Burgo tenet in Herleston' feodum j. militis.

Johannes de Grantesete tenet in Hokiton' duas partes feodi j. militis.

Alexander Mangant tenet in Harleton' feodum dimidii militis.

Philippus de Stanton' tenet in Lolleworth' feodum j. militis.

Baronia Hugonis de Diuue.

Saerus de Sancto Andrea et participes sui tenent in Henxton' feodum unius militis de domino rege in capite.

Henricus de Trumpiton' tenet in Trumpiton' feodum j. militis.

Gilbertus de Herleston' tenet in Henxton' feodum dimidii militis.

Tristram de Fraxino tenet in Henxton' feodum dimidii militis.

922 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.24.II.587-592 - cont.

Fulco filius Warini tenet in Taddelawe feodum i. militis.

Radulfus cancellarius domini regis tenet in Orewell' feodum j militis.

Baronia Radulfi de Mortuo Mari.

Walterus Marescallus tenet in Grantesete tres partes feodi j. militis.

Johannes de Coteham tenet in Badburgeham quartam partem feodi eiusdem militis.

Eborardus de Trumpiton' tenet in Trumpiton' feodum j. militis.

R. comes Wintonie tenet in Suho terciam partem feodi j. militis.

Willelmus de Sancto Georgio tenet in Weston' duas partes feodi eiusdem militis.

Godefridus de Craucumbe tenet in Hasefingefeld feodum dimidii militis de baronia Stephani de Sumery.

Abbas de Rames' tenet feoda iiijam militum de domino rege in capite.

Baronia Picoti. [1]

Rogerus de Huntingefeld tenet in Bokeswrth' quartam partem feodi j. militis in capite de domino rege.

Baldewinus Blangernun tenet in Coniton' quartam partem feodi j. militis de Willelmo la Cusche.

Willelmus la Cusche tenet in Cueye quartam partem feodi j , militis in capite de domino rege.

Willelmus de Cueye tenet in Cueye et in Hattele feodum dimidii militis de Willelmo la Cusche.

Ricardus le Butiller tenet in Waterbech' feodum dimidii militis in capite de domino rege.

Nicholaus de Feugeres tenet in Crauden' feodum dimidii militis de Ricardo le Butiller.

Baronia Glovernie,

Rogerus de Huntingefeld tenet in Harleton' feodum j. militis.

Rogerus de Huntingefeld tenet in Litllngton' quartam partem feodi j. militis.

Oliverus Malle tenet in Wlfle feodum dimidii militis.

Vitalis de Grafham tenet in Grafham feodum dimidii militis.

Nicholaus de Bassingeburn' tenet in Granteden' quartam partem feodi j. militis.

Juetta de Abodele et Adam Gerebode tenent in Granteden' quartam partem feodi j. militis.

Alexander le Moyne tenet in Abington' [feodum dimidii militis cancelled] duodecimam partem feodi j. militis.


[1] For Picot the Domesday tenant see Liber memorandorum Ecclesie de Bernewelle, p. 38.

CAMBRIDGE AND HUNTINGDON. 923

S.ij.24.II.587-592 - cont.

Radulfus Pirot tenet in Sauaeton' feoda ij. militum de domino rege in capite.

Petrus de Kenet tenet in Kenet feodum j. militis de baronia comitis Warenne.

Rogerus de Colevill' tenet in Weston' feodum j. militis de eadem baronia.

Baldewinus de Rosey tenet in Enhale insimul cum terris suis in Houcton', Crek et Gidesterne in Norff' feodum j. militis de honore de Wrmegay.

Willelmus Engayn' tenet in Weresle feodum j. militis de Willelmo de Bello Campo.

Prior de Chikesand tenet in Taddelawe quartam partem feodi j. militis.

Baronia de Luvetot.

Nigellus de Amundevill', Margareta de Vernun, et Rogerus de Luvetot tenent in Suho, Pirie et Grafham feoda ij. militum de domino rege in capite.

Willelmus Cardun tenet in Winewik tres partes feodi j. militis et quintam partem quarte partis feodi j. militis.

Robertus de Bellomesnagio tenet in Sautr' feodum j. militis.

Walterus de Wassingele tenet in Wassingel' feodum dimidii militis et decimam partem feodi j. militis.

Reginaldus de Bellomesnagio tenet in Terringes quartam partem feodi j. militis.

Johannes de Lungevill' tenet in Everton' [1] feodum j. militis.

Willelmus le Moyne tenet in Offord terciam partem duarum partium feodi j. militis.

Willelmus de Cueye tenet in Hemmingeford terciam partem duarum partium feodi j. militis.

Berenger le Moyne tenet in Terringe terciam partem duarum partium feodi j. militis.

Robertus de Bellomesnagio et prior Huntedonie tenent in Pappewrth' terciam partem feodi j. militis.

Prior Huntedonie tenet in Gedding' feodum j. militis.

Rogerus de Cantelupo et heres Henrici de Waldesef tenent in Cestreten' feodum dimidii militis.

Alicia de Amundevill' tenet in Stilton' feodum dimidii militis excepta xxma parte.

Baronia Huntedonie.

Isabella de Brus tenet manerium de Coniton' de domino rege in capite in communa baronie.

Philippa que fuit uxor Johannis le Daneys tenet in Offord feodum j. militis.


[1] Read Overton.

924 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.24.II.587-592 - cont.

Cecilia Tailleboys tenet in Touleslund feodum dimidii militis.

Ivo Quarel tenet in Bouton' et Berkford feodum dimidii militis.

Gilbertus le Moyne tenet in Parva Paxton' feodum dimidii militis.

Willelmus de Lindes' tenet in Muleswrth' feodum dimidii militis.

Felicia de Lindes' tenet in Caldecote feodum dimidii militis.

Leoyne Duning tenet in Cantebr' feodum dimidii militis.

Nicholaus de Bello Campo tenet in Fulburn feodum dimidii militis de domino rege in capite.

Tenentes terras Johannis de Verly tenent in Brunne quartam partem feodi j. militis.

Baronia Galfridi de Scalariis.

Galfridus de Scalariis tenet in Waddon' feoda ij. militum de domino rege in capite.

Colinus de Peugeres tenet in Abington' feodum j. militis.

Alexander le Moyne tenet in Abington duodecimam partem feodi j. militis.

Prior Angleseie, Philippus de Abington', Sampson le Blund et Eborardus de Orewell' tenent in Stepelmordun' et in Orewell' quartam partem feodi j. militis.

Radulfus de Saham tenet in Waddon' terciam partem quarte partis feodi j. militis.

Abbas de Lavenden' tenet in Waddon' duodecimam partem feodi j. militis.

Radulfus filius Fulconis tenet in Seperee quartam partem feodi j. militis.

Johannes de Scalariis tenet in Dullingeham feodum dimidii mllitis.

H. comes Kancie tenet in Saham feodum dimidii militis de domino rege in capite.

Philippus Basset tenet in Saham quartam partem feodi j. militis de predicto comite.

Robertus le Noreis tenet [1] Fordham feodum dimidii militis de domino rege in capite.

Eadmundus de Kemesek tenet in Fordham feodum dimidii militis de domino rege in capite.

Baronia Cristiane Ledet.

Ricardus de Audevill' tenet in Everesdon' feodum, j. militis.

Alanus de Berton' tenet in Berton' feoda ij. militum.

Willelmus de Chesney tenet in Stanton' feodum dimidii militis.

Willelmus le Pranceys tenet in Winepol' feodum dimidii militis.

[Egidius de Argentem tenet in Meldebum quartam partem feodi j. militis.] (Cancelled.) De feodo episcopi Eliensis.

Ricardus de Audevill' tenet in Clopton' feodum j. militis de baronia Warini filli Geroldi.


[1] Supply in.

CAMBRIDGE AND HUNTINGDON. 925

S.ij.24.II.587-592 - cont.

Henricus de Childerle tenet in Winepole feodum j. militis de eadem baronia.

Robertus de Gimeges tenet in Botulvesbreg duas partes feodi j. militis de domino rege.

Warneras Engayn' tenet in Geddinge quartam partem feodi j. militis de domino rege in capite.

Robertus de Pernes tenet in Mordun' quartam partem feodi j. militis.

S.ij.26.II.592-598.

ROTULUS DE SCUTAGIO WASCONIE COMITATUUM CANTEBRIGIE ET HUNTEDONIE.

De Baronia H. de Ver, Comitis Oxonie. In rotulo.

Reginaldus Arsick tenet in Selverle feoda ij. militum. In thesauro iiij.l.

Emma de Lega tenet in Hemingefor et Gillinge feoda iij. militum. In thesauro vj.l.

Henricus de Bello Campo in Sexton' tenet feodum j. militis. In thesauro xl.s.

Thomas de Laveam tenet in eadem feodum j. militis. In thesauro xl.s.

Willelmus Talemasch' tenet in WUburgeham feodum j. militis. In thesauro xl.s.

Martinus Camerarius tenet in eadem feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Robertus de Gisnes tenet in Asle feodum j. militis. In thesauro xl.s.

Heredes Johannis le Daneys tenent in Hildrichesham feodum j. militis. In thesauro xl.s.

Summa x. feoda et dimidium.

De Baronia [Willelmi de Percy cancelled] Roberti de Sancto Johanne Breve.

[Johannes de Wallibus tenet in Sneylwell' feodum j. militis.] Cancelled.

De Baronia de Munfichet. Breve.

[Willelmus Bure et participes sui tenent in Sudicampes feodum j. militis. In thesauro xxiiij.s,

Baldewinus de Ver tenet in Barenton' quartam partem j. militis. In thesauro x.s.

Willelmus filius Ricardi tenet in Fulmere feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.] (Cancelled.)

De Baronia de Munbray.

Henricus de Lunchamp tenet in Eltesle tres partes j. militis. In thesauro xxx.s.

926 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.26.II.592-598 - cont.

De [Baronia Gilberti Pech' cancelled] Honore Pagani Peverel [1] de Londonus. In rotulo.

Elena de Bech' tenet in Mordun' feodum dimidii militis. xx.s.

Elena de Bech' tenet in Winepol' feodum j. militis. xl.s.

Elena de Bech' tenet in Toft' feodum dimidii militis. xx.s.

Elena de Bech' tenet in Bech' feodum dimidii militis. xx.s.

Sibilla de Crauden tenet in eadem feodum j. militis. xl.s.

Radulfus de Banc' tenet in Gelden'Mordun' feodum dimidii militis. xx.s.

Willelmus de Wichenton' tenet in eadem feodum dimidii militis. xx.s.

Petrus de Bech' tenet in eadem feodum dimidfi militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Willelmus Pichard tenet in eadem feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Galfridus de Banc' tenet in Kingeston' feoda iij. militum. In thesauro vj.l.

Johannes de Coteham tenet in Cumberton' feodum j. militis. In thesauro xl.s.

Johannes de Burgo tenet in Herleston' feodum j. militis.

Fulco filius Warini tenet in Tadelawe feodum j. militis. In thesauro xl.s.

Johannes de Granteset' tenet in Hokiton' duas partes feodi j. militis. In thesauro ij.m.

Alexander Mangant tenet in Harleton' feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Philippus de Stanton' tenet in Lollewrth' feodum j. militis. In thesauro xl.s.

Robertus Mile tenet in Brunne feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Henricus de Trumpiton' tenet in eadem feodum j. militis. In thesauro xl.s. Respice infra, post Saerum in magno rotulo.

Gilbertus de Herleston' tenet in Henxton' feodum dimidii militis. xx.s. Quia infra Saerum de Sancto Andrea.

Tristram de Fraxino tenet in Henxton' feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s. Quia infra Saerum de Sancto Andrea.

Summa xv. feoda et vja.

De Baronia Radulfi de Mortuo Mari. In rotulo.

Hawisia de Cestr' tenet in Granteset' tres partes j. militis. In thesauro xxx.s.

Johannes de Coteham tenet in Badburgeham quartam partem eiusdem militis. In thesauro x.s.

Eborardus de Trumpiton' tenet in eadem feodum j. militis. In thesauro [xx.s. cancelled] xl.s.

Comes Wintonie tenet in Suho terciam partem j. militis. In thesauro [xx.s. cancelled] j.m.


[1] Payn Peverel, who lived in the reign of Henry I, was brother to William Peverel of Dover. Eyton's Antiquities of Shropshire, vol. ix. p. 68.

CAMBRIDGE AND HUNTINGDON. 927

S.ij.26.II.592-598 - cont.

Willelmus de Sancto Georgio tenet in Weston' duas partes eiusdem militis. In thesauro [xx.s. cancelled] ij.m.

Summa iij. feoda.

De Baronia Stephani de Sumery. In rotulo.

Godefridus de Craucumbe tenet in Haselingefeld feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

De Baronia Picoti. In rotulo.

Rogerus de Huntingefeld tenet in Bokeswrth' quartam partem j. militis. In thesauro x.s.

Baldewinus Blangernun tenet in Coniton' quartam partem j. militis. In thesauro x.s.

Willelmus la Chushe tenet in Cueye quartam partem j. militis. In thesauro x.s.

Willelmus de Cueye tenet in eadem et in Hattel' feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Ricardus le Butiller tenet in Waterbech' feodum dimidfi militis. In thesauro xx.s.

[Nicholaus de Feugeres tenet in Crauden' feodum dimidii militis.] (Cancelled.) Quia Ricardus Pincerna respondet pro eo.

De Baronia Glovernie. In rotulo.

Rogerus de Huntingefeld tenet [1] Harleton' feodum j. mllitis. In thesauro xl.s.

Rogerus de Huntingefeld tenet in Litlington' quartam partem j. militis. In thesauro x.s.

[Radulfus domini regis cancellarius tenet in Orewell' feodum j , militis. In thesauro xl.s.] (Cancelled.)

[Henricus de Trumpiton' tenet in eadem feodum j. militis.] (Cancelled.) Quia alibi.

Oliverus Malle tenet in Wlfle feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Vitalis de Grafham tenet in eadem feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Nicholaus de Bassingeburn', Juetta [2] de Albodel' et Adam Gerebode tenent in Granteden' [duas partes cancelled] dimidium feodum j. militis. In thesauro xx.s.

De Baronia Radulfi Pirot. In rotulo.

Radulfus Pirot tenet in Sauseton' feoda duorum militum. In thesauro iiij.l.

De Baronia de Warenna. In rotulo.

Petrus de Kenet tenet in Kenet feodum j. militis et dimidii. In thesauro xl.s.

Rogerus de Colevill' tenet in Weston' feodum j. militis.


[1] Supply in.
[2] Substituted for Cecilia.

928 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.26.II.592-598 - cont.

Baldewinus de Rosey tenet in Enhal' quartam partem feodi j. militis de Wrmegay. In rotulo. Breve. [1]

De Baronia Willelmi de Bello Campo. In rotulo. Breve.

[Willelmus Engayn tenet in Weresle feodum j. militis.] (Cancelled.)

[Prior de Chikesand tenet in Tadelawe quartam partem feodi j. militis.] (Cancelled.)

De Baronia de Luvetot. In rotulo.

Willelmus Cardun tenet in Winewik [feodum dimidii cancelled] tres partes j. militis. In thesauro xxxij.s.

Nigellus de Amundevill' tenet in Suho, Pirie et Graffham feoda ij. militum. In thesauro iiij.l.

Robertus de Bellomesnagio tenet in Sautr' feodum j. militis. In thesauro xl.s.

Walterus de Wassingele tenet in eadem feodum dimidii militis et decimam partem j. militis. In theaauro xxiiij .a.

Reginaldus de Bellomesnagio tenet in Terringes quartam partem j. militis. In thesauro x.s.

Johannes de Lungevill' tenet in Overton' feodum j. militis.

Willelmus le Moyne tenet in Offord terciam partem duarum partium feodi unius mllitis. viijs. xj.d.

Willelmus de Cueye tenet in Hemmingeford terciam partem duarum partium feodi eiusdem militis. In thesauro viij.s. xj.d.

Heres Reginaldi le Moyn' tenet in Terringe terciam partem duarum partium feodi eiusdem militis. In thesauro viij.s. xj.d.

Robertus de Bellomesnagio et prior Huntingdonie tenent in Pappewrth' terciam partem feodi eiusdem militis. In thesauro j.m.

Prior Huntingdonie tenet in Gedding' feodum j. militis. In thesauro xl.s.

Rogerus de Cantelupo et heres Henrici de Waldesef tenent in Cestreton' feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Alicia de Amundevill' tenet in Stilton' feodum dimidii militis excepta xxma parte.

De tenentibus Isabelle de Bras de honore Huntedonie.

In rotulo.

Philippa que fuit uxor Johannis le Daneys tenet in Offord feodum j. militis. In thesauro [dimidia marca cancelled] totum.

Cecilla Tailleboys tenet in Touleslund feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro [v.s. cancelled] totum.

Ivo Quarel tenet in Bouton' feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Gilbertus le Moyn' tenet in Parva Paxton' feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Willelmus de Lindeseya tenet in Muleswrth' feodum dimidii militis. xx.s.


[1] A correction.

CAMBRIDGE AND HUNTINGDON. 929

S.ij.26.II.592-598 - cont.

Felicia de Lindes' tenet in Caldecote feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Leoyn' Dunning tenet in Cantebr' feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Nicholaus de Bello Campo tenet in Fulburm' de domino rege in capite feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s. In rotulo.

De Baronia Roberti filius Walteri. In rotulo.

Tenentes terras Johannis de Verly tenent in Brunne quartam partem feodi j. militis. In thesauro viij.s. vij.d. ob.

Abbas Rames' tenet feoda iiijor militum de domino rege in capite. In thesauro viij.l. In rotulo.

De Baronia Galfridi de Scalariis qui tenet in Waddon' feoda ij. militum. In thesauro xl.s. In rotulo. [1]

Colinus de Feugeres tenet in Abington' feodum j. militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Alexander le Moyne tenet in Abington' duodecimam partem feodi j. militis. In thesauro xl.d.

Prior Angleseie, Philippus de Abington', Samson Lebund [2] et Everard de Orewell' tenent in Stepelmordun' et in Orewell' quartam partem feodi j. militis. In thesauro v.s.

Radulfus de Saham tenet in Waddon' terciam partem quartem j. militis.

Thomas de Wadon' tenet in eadem tres partes quarterii feodi j. militis. In thesauro dimidia marca.

Abbas de Lavenden' tenet in Waddon' duodecimam partem feodi j. militis. In thesauro xl.d.

Radulfus filius Fulconis tenet in Seperee quartem partem feodi unius militis. In thesauro dimidia marca.

Johannes de Scalariis tenet in Dullingeham feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Saerus de Sancto Andrea et participes aui tenent in Henxton' feodum j. militis de rege. In rotulo.

Comes Cancie tenet in Saham feodum dimidii militis de domino rege in capite cum quarta partej. militis, x.s. In rotulo. Respectuatur per breve.

[Philippus Basset tenet in Saham quartam partem feodi j. militis de comite Kancie.] Cancelled.

Robertus le Noreys tenet in Fordham feodum dimidii militis de domino rege in capite. In thesauro xx.s. In rotulo.

Eadmundus de Kemesek tenet in Fordham feodum dimidii militis de domino rege in capites In thesauro xx.s. In rotulo.


[1] This applies to the eight entries which follow.
[2] Read le Blund.

930 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.26.II.592-598 - cont.

[Henricus de Fokewrth' tenet in eadem feoda ij. militum.] (Cancelled.) De Baronia Bolebek.

De Baronia Ledet de Wardon.

Ricardus de Audevill' tenet in Everesdon' feodum j. militis. In thesauro xl.s.

Alanus de Berton' tenet in Berton' feoda duorum militum. In thesauro iiij.l.

Willelmus de Chesney tenet in Stanton' feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

Willelmus de le Franeeys tenet in Winepol' feodum dimidii militis. In thesauro xx.s.

[Egidius de Argentem tenet in Meldeburn' quartam partem feodi j. militis.] (Cancelled.) Quia de baronia de Blyenai episcopo.

De Baronia Warini filii Geroldi. In rotulo.

Ricardus de Audevill' tenet in Clopton' feodum j. militis. In thesauro xl.s.

Henricus de Childerle tenet in Winepol' feodum j. mllitis. In thesauro xl.s.

Robertus de Gimeges tenet in Botulvesbreg' de domino rege in capite duas partes feodi j. militis. In thesauro ij.m. In rotulo.

Warnerus Engayn' tenet in Geddinge quartam partem feodi j. militis de domino rege. In thesauro x.s. In rotulo.

De Baronia Marscalfi. In rotulo. [1]

[Gilbertus Pech' tenet in Chafle feodum j. militis.] (Cancelled.) Quia de feodo Marscalli.

Jordanus de Abernun tenet in Dukeswrth' feodum dimidii militis.

Robertus de Pernes tenet in Gelden' Mordun' quartam partem feodi j. militis.

[Endorsed:-] Cantebr', Huntingdon. In libro.

NORTHAMPTON.

I.102-122.

NORHAMPTON'.

Feoda militum tenencium de domino rege in capite et tenencium de ipsis tenentibus de domino rege in capite et tenencium de wardia que sunt in manu domini regis in comitatu Norhamt', preter scutagia eorum qui brevia tulerunt de habendis scutagiis suis, et preter feoda militum existencium infra ballivam abbatis Burgi.


[1] This mistaken note is corrected in the case of Gilbert Peche's fee by cancellation and an explanatory note. The note is roughly bracketed to apply to the fee of Jordan de Abernun also; but that fee has not been cancelled, as should have been done.

NORTHAMPTON. 931

I.102-122 - cont.

Feoda tenencium in capite de domino rege.

Eustachius de Watford' tenet in Watford' dimidium feodum.

Ricardus de Lindon' tenet unum feodum in Eston' in comitatu Norhamt' et Castr' in comitatu Roteland' et unum feodum in Budenho et Boeston' in comitatu Bedefordie.

Gilbertus de Preston dimidium feodum in Gretton' per cartam Regis J. Et sicut continetur in rotulo xijo R.E. filii R.E. in Norhamt'. [1]

Feoda Henrici de Pinkiny que tenet in capite de domino rege.

Idem Henricus tenet dimidium feodum in Wappenham in dominico.

Robertus de Pinkeny tenet de ipso Henrico manerium de Stanes pro dimidio feodo.

Robertus de Wancy tenet de ipso Henrico unum feodum in Estwell' et Faucot'.

Simon de Pinkeny tenet de eodem Henrico duo feoda in Morton' et unum feodum in Sulegrave et unum feodum in Siresh', Estwell' et Faucot'.

Philippa que fuit uxor Willelmi de Colewurth' tenet unum feodum in Sulegrave.

Willelmus de Colewurth' unum feodum in Colewurth'.

Feoda Cristiane Ledet que tenet in capite de domino rege.

Eadem Cristiana tenet in dominico feodum unius militis in Wardon'.

Robertus de Pavily tenet in Suleby feodum unius militis de abbate Westmonasterii de honore de Wardon', et Galfridus Dispensator tenet ad firmam et habet scutagium suum per breve.

Henricus de Isham tenet de ipsa unum feodum in Isham.

Nicholaus de Cugenho tenet unum feodum in Cugenho et Harewedon'.

Abbas de Seleby tenet in Stanford' juxta Lilleburne duo feoda in perpetua elemosina de Cristiana Ledet de honore de Wardon'.

Feoda Margerie de Ripariis que tenet in capite de domino rege.

Simon filius Simonis tenet de ea duo feoda et dimidium in Brikeleswurth'.

Petrus Barre tenet unum feodum in Billing'.

Simon de Loges tenet unum feodum in Orlingber, Harewedon'. et Holecot'.


[1] Laurencius de Preston xxv.l. de feodi fiima manerii de Gretton' quod fuit de corpore comitatus et quod Rex Johannes per cartam suam dedit Waltero de Preston, habendum ad feodi firmam de ipso Rege Johanne et heredibus suis eidem Waltero et heredibus suis pro xxv.l. inde reddendis per annum et faciendo hide servicium dimidii feodi militis pro omni servicio, sicut continetur in rotulis vj. vij. et viij. dicti Regis Johannis et in rolulis sequentibus, et xxv.l. de anno preterito; quam quidem firmam M. regina habuit ad totam vitam suam.

932 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.102-122 - cont.

Prior de Esseby et Alexander de Bosco tenent terciam partem unius feodi in Attenestun'.

Ricardus Gulafre tenet duas partes unius feodi in Blacullesle.

Feoda Hugonis de Ver, Comitis Oxonie, que tenet in capite de domino rege.

Walterus de Sancto Leodegario tenet de eo dimidium feodum in Waude.

Robertus Rote cum Cristiana uxore sua dimidium feodum ibidem.

Robertus de Hasting' dimidium feodum ibidem.

Jordanus le Bret dimidium feodum ibidem.

Feoda que fuerunt Ricardi de Kaynes que tenuit in capite de domino rege. Parva feoda.

Ricardus de Fardingeston' tenet unum parvum feodum in Purston' et Evenl'.

Walterus de Gatesden' unum parvum feodum in Fardingeston'.

Hugo Luvel unum parvum feodum in Fardingeston' et Kyselingbiry.

Agnes que fuit uxor [1] Rogeri de Heyford' unum parvum feodum in Brinton' et Charewalton'.

Robertus Revel unum parvum feodum in Kouesgrave, Pokesl', Tiffeud et Buckeby.

Feoda tenencium de Honore Peverel de Notingh'.

Willelmus de Esseby tenet unum feodum in Katesby et Newbolthl',

Willelmus Burdun unum feodum et dimidium in Deresbure.

Willelmus le Hauberger tenet de Johanne de Heriz unum feodum in Keylemers.

Robertus de Pavily duo feoda in Westpiry, Heytmindecot' et Houhton'.

Petrus de Goudinton' unum feodum et dimidium in Ravenestorp', Cotes, Tekne, Holewell', Wynewic, Turneby et Coldesseby.

Idem Petrus terciam partem unius feodi in Nortoft quam Willelmus de Nortoft tenet de eo.

Idem Petrus et participes sui, heredes Roberti de Salceto, dimidium feodum in Horepol, Plumton'.

Eustachius de Cantilupo ij. feoda in Bereweby.

Prior Hospitalis Sancti Johannis Ierosolyme unum feodum in Blaculfesl'.

Willelmus de Nonencurt unum feodum in Gildisburc.

Archiepiscopua Eboracensis, custos terre et heredis Willelmi de Duston', unum parvum feodum in Duston'.

Feoda Rogeri de Mumbray tenentis in capite de domino rege.

Willelmus de la Launde et Eustachia de Wyvill', uxor sua, unum feodum et dimidium in Welleford'.

Thomas de Estleg', Ricardus de Curchun, et Willelmus de Esseby unum feodum in Crec.


[1] B and C read Agnes filia Rogeri.

NORTHAMPTON. 933

I.102-122 - cont.

Rogerus de Whelton' tria parva feoda in Whelton', Staverton' el Grimmescot' de Johanna Wake.

Feoda Willelmi filii Hamonis que tenet in capite de domino rege.

Idem Willelmus tenet in dominico quartam partem unius feodi in Wyk'.

Alanus de Maydewell' tenet de eo unum feodum in Maidewell'.

Eva de Gray dimidium feodum in Tenford'.

Feoda Prioris de Coventr' que tenet in capite de domino rege.

Parva feoda.

Prior de Davintr' tenet de eo dimidium feodum in Westhaddon'.

Abbas de Pipwell' tenet de eo quartam partem unius feodi in Coldesseby.

Robertus de Coldesseby quartam partem unius feodi in Coldesseby.

Feoda tenencium de Honore de Clare qui est in manu domini regis.

Rogerus de Baskerevil' tenet dimidium feodum in Helidon'.

Roaldus filius Alani et Radulfus de Kamois unum feodum in Tanesour'.

Rogerus de Deneford et Johannes quartam partem unius feodi in Cotes.

Ricardus de Flor' quintam partem unius parvi feodi in Heyford'.

Nicholaus de Den sextam decimam partem unius feodi in Stanerne.

Feoda tenencium de Honore de Gloucestria qui est in manu domini regis.

Thomas de Furneus tenet unum feodum in Raund'.

Henricus de Raund' quartam partem unius feodi ibidem.

Feoda W. Comitis de Fenariis que tenet in capite de domino rege de Honore Peverel.

Idem W. Comes tenet manerium de Hecham cum pertinenciis per servicium unius militis.

Subscripti tenent de eo de eodem feodo scilicet:-

Thomas de Ebraycis tenet dimidium feodum in Boseyate.

Ricardus de Irecestr' tenet viij. partem in Irecestr'.

Henricus de Raund' tenet viij. partem unius feodi in Raund'.

Johanna de Bryuere tenet dimidium feodum in Bliheswurth.

Henricus de Billing' tenet sextain partem unius feodi in Bisseden'.

Gilbertus de Segrave dimidium feodum in Raund'.

Gilbertus de Preston'tenet unum feodum in Quenton', Dodinton' cum molendino de Dichford'.

Paganus de Sancto Phileberto tend dimidium feodum in Caldecot et Thelveston'.'

Matheus de Iverny dimidium feodum in Rincsted' et Stanewig'.

Walterus de Insula tenet quadragesimam partem unius feodi in Cestr'.


[1] Read Chelveston'.

934 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.102-122 - cont.

Prior de Chikesand tenet in Hargrave octavam partem unius feodi.

Feoda predicti W. Comitis de Ferrariis de Honore de Tutebir'.

Willelmus de Mungomery tenet duo feoda in Eketon'.

Henricus Gubium tenet terciam partem unius feodi in Jerdel'.

Johannes filius Galfridi terciam partem unius feodi in Estpery.

Henricus Mauveisin tenet in Passeham dimidium feodum.

Petrus Barre tenet unum feodum in Magna Billing' de feodo Radulfi de Mortuo Mari.

Feoda Radulfi Basset de Weledon' que tenet in capite de domino rege.

Idem Radulfus tenet in dominico dimidium feodum in Weledon' et unum feodum in Weston' et Sutton'.

Vitalie Engayne tenet de eo unum feodum in Blatherwic, Riston', Multon' et Bradden'.

Johannes Bernak' tenet decimam partem unius feodi in Blatherwik'.

Willelmus de Cole vill' et Hecelina uxor eius tenent terciam partem unius feodi in Branton'.

Willelmus le Breton' tenet vicesimam partem unius feodi in Blatherwic.

Simon le Sauvage et participes sui' de Spretton', Buketon' et Creton' tenent quartam partem feodi unius militis.

Feoda Johannis de Baiocis que tenet in capite de domino rege.

Robertus Rabaz tenet dimidium feodum in Maidewell'.

Stephanus de Blokevil' tenet quartam partem unius feodi in Wynewic.

Robertus Luvet tenet dimidium feodum in Welleford' de honore de Brunne.

Feoda Willelmi Mauduit que tenet in capite de domino rege.

Willelmus de Nodariis tenet de eo tres partes unius feodi in Eston'.

Robertus Lupus tenet dimidium feodum in Esse et Eston'.

Isabella de Berners tenet de Nicholao de Bassingburn', qui tenet in capite de domino rege, quartam partem unius feodi in Abinton' in dotem.

Feoda Isabelle de Brus que tenet in capite de domino rege de Honore de Huntendon'.

Galfridus de Leukenor' tenet de ea unum feodum in Magna Harewedon' et unum feodum et dimidium in Parva Harewedon' et Clipston' et unum feodum et dimidium in Bruhton' et unum feodum in Hochecot'. Summa v. feoda.

NORTHAMPTON. 935

I.102-122 - cont.

Johannes de Sproxton' tenet dimidium feodum in Oxindon'.

Johannes de Vallibus tenet sextam partem unius feodi in Farendon'.

Feoda Johannis Marescalli que tenuit in capite de domino rege.

Emma que fuit uxor Wydonis de Watervill' tenet dimidium feodum in Essel'.

Johannes de Stanerne et Petrus Peverel tenent decern partes unius feodi ibidem.

Philippus de Langeberg' et Robertus de Marisco tenent quintam partem feodi unius militis in manerio de Norton', quod fuit manerium domini regis et quod idem Johannes tenuit.

Tenentes de Honore de Aquila.

Walterus de Forho tenet unum parvum feodum in Forho.

Willelmus de Echingham tenet terciam partem unius parvi feodi in Parva Preston'.

Magister hospitalis Sancti Johannis Norhamt' et Alanus de Tiffeud tenent in Tiffeud' unum parvum feodum cum una virgata terre et dimidia quam Walterus de Forho tenet in Kouesgrave.

Feoda que fuerunt Johannis de Bydum.

Ricardus de Newton' tenet dimidium feodum in Newton'.

Ermenlard' de Bydun tenet dimidium feodum in Newton' et Cotes.

Felicia de Millers tenet duas partes unius parvi feodi in Oveston' de feodo Hamonis Creuquer quod fuit Willelmi de Averences.

Abbas de Bithlisden' tenet in Preston' dimidium parvum feodum de Radulfo de Chendut.

Feoda que fuerunt Johannis de Lacy quondam Comitis Lincolnie.

Ricardus le Baud tenet in Lodinton' duas partes unius feodi.

Galfridus de Birres tenet in Clipston' octavam partem feodi unius militis.

Henricus de Longo Campo tenet ibidem sextam unius feodi.

Feoda Willelmi de Stutevill'.

Thomas filius Sampsonis tenet tres partes unius feodi in Lichesbarue.

Feoda Walteri filii Roberti.

Walterus filius Simonis tenet unum feodum in Davintr et Drayton'.

Simon de Pateshull' tenet vicesimam partem unius feodi in Buckebroc de comite de Ferrariis de honore Cestrie.

Subscripti tenent in manerio de Rowell' quod est in custodia domini regis cum Ricardo de Clare, scilicet:-

Willelmus de Cantilupo dimidium feodum.

936 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.102-122 - cont.

Gilbertus de Preston' tenet ibidem dimidium feodum de herede Henrici de Braybroc.

Wydo Wake tenet ibidem quartem partem unius feodi de herede Gilberti de Clare.

Johannes Pauvel et Ricardus Griffin tenent duas partes unius parvi feodi in Weston' de feodo Ernaldi de Bosco.

(Also in II.868.)

Feoda Hospitalis pertinencia ad manerium de Hetherinton'

In Newbolthl' unum parvum feodum.

In Jelvertotft tercia pars unius parvi feodi.

In Clendon' unum parvum feodum.

In Buckeby tercia pars unius parvi feodi.

In Braybroc dimidium parvum feodum.

In Fardingeston' quarta pars unius parvi feodi. [1]

Johannes Durvassal tenet in Stanton' medietatem unius parvi feodi de Hervico Bagot de Stafford'.

Ricardus de Offinton' tenet ibidem medietatem unius parvi feodi de dicto Hervico.

Robertus filius Ricardi tenet in Wyleby terciam partem unius feodi de Waltero de Wyleby, et Walterus de Hugone Dispensario, et idem Hugo in. capite de domino rege, et fuit quondam de honore de Huntedon'.

Feoda Abbatis de Rames'.

Willelmus de Whicheston' tenet in Whicheston' et Dodinton' nonam partem unius feodi.

Wydo Wake cum Isabella Trussel, uxore sua, tenet in Torp Malesoures dimidium parvum feodum de Roberto Gumbaud.

Hundreda de Pokesbroc, Navisford', Hokeslawe, Suthnaveslond', Northnaveslond' et Nassus Burgi.

Feoda forinseca militum que sunt infra libertatem abbatis de Burgo et non tenentur in capite de abbate.

De Honore de Clare.

Willelmus Hay tenet in Crappeston' [2] et Deneford' viij. partem feodi militis.


[1] In II.868 there is the following addition:- Summa feodorum iij. et sexta pars unius feodi, de quibus Alanus de Maydewell', vicecomes domini Regis Henrici anno xxvj to in comitatu Northamt', respondet ad scaccarium de auxilio ad transfretacionem regis in Wasconia, and the, word dubium is in the margin against the entry concerning Fardingeston'.
[2] Read Trappeston'.

NORTHAMPTON. 937

I.102-122 - cont.

Walterus de Deneford' tenet in Deneford' dimidium feodum de eodem honore.

Heres Mathei le Butiler tenet in Deneford' dimidium feodum.

Almaricus de Noers tenet in Luffewyk' tres partes dimidii feodi.

Gloucestria.

Abbas de Croxston' tenet in Burthon' et Chingden' [1] sextam partem feodi militis.

Mauricius de Andel tenet in Adinton' xij. partem feodi militis.

Heredes Ricardi de Hanred' tenent in Northbarton' unum feodum militis.

Willelmus Trayfi tenet in Wodeford' dimidium feodum militis.

De domino Rege.

Nicholaus de Bassingburn' tenet in Benifeld' quartam partem feodi militis.

Johannes de Folkesworth' tenet in Stipinton' et Walmesford' sextam partem feodi militis de Nicholao de Bassingburn', et Nicholaus de rege.

Henricus de Drayton' tenet in Islape, Drayton', Adinton', dimidium feodum militis, et Baldewinus de Ver tenet inde quartam partem de dimidio feodo in Adinton'.

Baldewinus de Ver tenet in Trapeston' dimidium feodum militis de honore de Bronne.

Johannes de Plassiz tenet in Tichemers duo feoda militum de honore de Tutebyrs, unde Radulfus de Tichemers, Robertus le Her, Willelmus de Suthbure tenent unum feodum de dicto Johanne.

Petrus de Grendon' tenet in Wadenho ad firmam de domino rege dimidium feodum militis de Hugone de Ver.

Radulfus de Craneford' tenet in eadem villa dimidium feodum militis de honore de Brikelesworth'.

Magister hospitalis Sancti Johannis de Norhamt' tenet in Slipton' dimidium feodum militis de dicto honore.

Robertus de Ver tenet in Slipton' et Twywell' dimidium feodum militis de Radulfo Morin, et ipse Radulfus de Henrico de Hastinges, et Henricus de honore de Huntindon'.

Heredes Nicholai Malemayns et Cristiana Leddet tenent in Burton' de baronia Alani Dynant qui habuit terram illam de dono domini Regis Henrici, avi domini Regis Ricardi, qui pugnavit contra pugilem Regis Francie intra Gysorz et Trie, set juratores non possunt inquirere per quale servicium.

Henricus de Audewinkle tenet in eadem villa dimidium feodum militis de Cristiana Leddet et Cristiana Leddet de honore de Westwardon'.

Willelmus de Musca tenet in Audewinkle dimidium feodum militis de Willelmo de Ros, set nescitur de cuius honore.


[1] Read Thingden.

938 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.102-122 - cont.

Heres Walteri Olifard' tenet in Lilleford' unum feodum militis de comite de Aubemar' de honore de Huntindon'.

Ricardus de Bernak' tenet in Bernak' unum feodum militis de honore de Dudeleya.

Feoda Honoris de Huntindon' de parte Henrici de Hastinges.

Robertus Grimbaud tenet quatuor feoda in Houhton', Herdwic, Bramfeud', et Multon' et Newton'.

Simon Vitor et participes sui tenent in Holecote quartam partem unius feodi.

Galfridus de Malesoures tenet unum feodum in Waudegrave.

Gilbertus de Preston' duo feoda in Preston', Wtton', Quenton' et Haninton'.

Abbatissa Sancte Marie de Pratis tenet in Hardingestorn quatuor partes unius feodi, et Radulfus de Besevill' quintam partem ibidem.

Willelmus Wardede [1] tenet quartam partem unius feodi in Haninton'.

David de Esseby tenet unum feodum in Esseby et Grendon'.

Henricus de Audedeleye tenet dimidium feodum in Houhton' in custodia de hereditate Willelmi de Houchton'.

Hugo de Goldingham tenet unum feodum in Riston'.

Heres Thome de Lindes' tenet in Barton' quartam partem unius feodi.

Willelmus de Campania tenet sextam partem unius feodi in Maiori Dudinton'.

Heres Johannis filii Roberti tenet dimidium feodum in Haringwurth'.

Simon filius Simonis tenet dimidium feodum in Scaudewell', Huhthorp et Houhton'.

Johannes Haunsard' tenet unum feodum in Boseiate.

Nicholaus de Cugenho tenet in Cugenho dimidium feodum.

Feoda dicti Honoris de Huntindon' de parte Willelmi de Fortibus et Johannis de Baillol.

Willelmus de Culewrth et Ricardus de Amundevill' tenent unum feodum in Trop juxta Bannebyr'.

Robertus filius Roberti tenet in Spretton' duas partes dimidii feodi.

Walterus filius Theobaldi tenet in eadem terciam partem de dimidio feodo.

Robertus filius Ricardi tenet in Wyleby unum feodum cum herede Roberti Foliot.

Robertus de Akele tenet in Maiori Akele feodum unius militis.

Simon de Sancto Licio tenet quartam partem unius feodi in Asseleg'.

Willelmus filius Saeri de Wolauston' tenet unum feodum in Wolauston'.


[1] Read Wardedeu.

NORTHAMPTON. 939

I.102-122 - cont.

Honor de Chokes quem Robertus de Gynes tenet. [1]

Robertus filius Radulfi tenet duo feoda in Wolauston'.

Walterus de Cnoston' duas partes unius feodi in Knoston'.

Gilbertus de Preston' tenet terciam partem unius feodi in Billing'.

Thomas de Besebroc dimidium feodum in Buchton' et Newton'.

Thomas de Breaute unum feodum in Grimmesbir'.

Simon de Thorp' et participes sui cfimidium feodum in Trorp juxta Davintr'.

Ricardus de Chokes dimidium feodum in Creton'.

Galfridus de Esteneston' et participes sui unum feodum in Estoneston' et Westhaddon'.

Simon de Pateshull' unum feodum in Ritheresthorp'.

Robertus de Grimnescot' cum Isabella uxore sua unum feodum in Flore.

Johannes de Hulecot' dimidium feodum in Hulecot'.

Hugo de Cranesl' dimidium feodum in Cranesle.

Walterus Marescallus tenet unum feodum in Buckeby de honore de Chokes, et tenet de Rogero de Quency.

Feoda Simonis de Monte Forti de Honore Leycestrie.

Willelmus Trussel tenet unum feodum in Merston'.

Ricardus de Luterinton' tenet terciam partem unius feodi in Torp juxta Lobenho.

Ricardus de Curcon', Thomas de Estleg', et Willelmus de Esseby tenent unum feodum in Lilleburne et Cotes.

Petrus de Holmo tenet quartam partem unius feodi in Westhaddon'.

Radulfus de la Haye tenet unum feodum et dimidium in utraque Branton'.

Henricus de Dyve tenet dimidium feodum in Minori Branton'.

Philippus de Couele tenet unum feodum in Haudeneby et Ravenestorp.

Matheus Wake tenet unum parvum feodum et dimidium in Brochole. Parvum feodum.

Simon de Creton' tenet unum parvum feodum in Creton' et Spretton'. Parvum feodum.

Agnes que fuit uxor filii Rogeri de Heyford' [2] tenet unum parvum feodum in Heyford' et Herliston'. Parvum feodum.

Ricardus de Curcon' tenet dimidium parvum feodum in Jelvertoft. Parvum feodum.

Walterus de Wyvile tenet dimidium parvum feodum in Turueby. Parvum feodum.

Hugo de Vallibus tenet quartam partem unius parvi feodi in Haudeneby. Parvum feodum.

Henricus de Sancto Mauro tenet quartam partem unius parvi feodi in Haninton'. Parvum feodum.

Johannes de Cranford', Willelmus de Dyve, Andreas de Trop, et Simon de Turevile tenent unum feodum in Esseby Cranford'.


[1] See Memoranda Roll, L.T.R. no. 14, m. 8d.
[2] Compare pp. 932 and 944.

940 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.102-122 - cont.

Robertus Mallore tenet dimidium feodum in Weleton'.

Robertus Ace et heredes Willelmi Ace et Simon de'Trop tenent quintam partem unius feodi in Weleton', Staverton' et Trap.

Ricardus de Gray tenet imum feodum in Newbolthle et Purston'.

Simon de Turevile tenet quartam partem unius feodi in Crowelton' de parvo feodo Moretann'.

Ricardus de Gray tenet dimidium feodum in Bifeud.

Heres Thome Wale unum feodum in Eyndon'.

Feoda Saeri de Wahull'.

Decanus Ebor' tenet in custodia cum herede Willelmi Butevilein duo feoda in Cotesbroc cum sede abbacie de Pipwell'.

Wydo Wake tenet cum Isabella uxore sua unum feodum in Langeport cum tribus virgatis terre in Egefiston' in comitatu Roteland'.

Hugo Gubiun, Johannes de Shirinton' et Radulfus Dayrel tenent unum feodum in Horton'.

Simon de Pateshull' tenet quartam partem unius feodi in Pateshull'.

Idem Saerus tenet in Pateshull' et Grimescot' unum feodum.

Robertus de Plumton' tenet dimidium feodum in Plumpton'.

Robertus de la Leye et prior de Esseby tenent unum feodum in Esseby.

Milo de Bello Campo et Lucas de Colum tenent unum feodum in Wtton'.

Robertus le Jeofne de Norhamt' et Willelmus de Insula cum Mabilla uxore sua tenent duo feoda in Pitesford'.

Anphelisia Foliot tenet unum feodum et dimidium in Evenle.

Radulfus de Evenl' tenet tres partes unius feodi in Evenl' et Estwic.

Johannes de Sutton' tenet dimidium feodum in Cherlton'.

Godefridus de Luuort tenet quartam partem unius feodi in Cherlton'.

Feoda Rogeri de Quency de Honore Leycestrie.

Johannes Manse tenet unum parvum feodum in Haselbech'.

Eustachia de Andon' unum parvum feodum in Spretton'.

Henricus de Alneto tenet feodum unius militis in Maydeford' cum duabus virgatis terre in Atteneston'.

Robertus de Plumton' tenet quartam partem unius feodi in Blaculfelesleg'.

Radulfus de Sancto Amando, Galfridus de Farrugho, Willelmus Abbe et monachi de Sancto Dionisio tenent unum feodum in Farnigho.

Ricardus Basset tenet in Wodeford' unum feodum.

Willelmus de Farendon' tenet quartam partem unius feodi in Farendon'.

Feoda de Honore de Berchamestede.

Willelmus Burdet tenet duas partes unius parvi feodi in Haselbech'.

Adam de Oxendon' tenet unum feodum in Parva Oxendon'.

NORTHAMPTON. 941

I.102-122 - cont.

Willelmus de Wardede [1] tenet in Aringwrth' dimidium feodum.

Johannes Hay tenet unum feodum in Blaculfesl'.

Aleseya de Chenduit tenet iiij. partem unius feodi in Middelton'.

Willelmus de Farendon' tenet unum feodum in Farendon'.

Rogerus Roce tenet in Houhton' unum parvum feodum.

Feoda Honoris de Walingford' qui est in manu Comitis Ricardi.

Milo Neyrenuit tenet duas partes unius feodi in Crowlton'.

Eva de Gray tenet dimidium feodum in Taneford'.

Feoda Comitis Herefordie de honore de Mandevill'.

Hugo de Messenden' tenet unum feodum in Croulton'.

Adam' que fuit uxor Johannis filii Roberti tenet unum feodum in Eynho in custodia cum Rogero filio et herede predicti Johannis.

Hugo de Messenden' tenet unum feodum in Culewrth'.

Johannes de Sutton', Radulfus de Purston' et Henricus de Buckynton' tenent unum feodum et dimidium in Hinton'.

Henricus de Hinton' tenet in Hinton' duo feoda et terciam partem unius feodi.

Adam filius Ricardi tenet in Flore quartam partem unius feodi de Henrico de Hinton' de honore predicto.

Feoda Oliveri de Eyncurt.

Abbas de Lilleshill' tenet dimidium feodum in Braunteston.

Willelmus de Ros dimidium feodum in eadem villa.

Prior de Novo Loco juxta Stanford' tenet dimidium feodum in eadem villa.

Feoda Johannis de Baillol de Honore Castri Bernardi.

Adam de Perinton' tenet quatuor feoda in Faxton', Waldegrave et Multon'.

Feoda Gerardi de Doddingesel'.

Petrus de Weston' tenet manerium de Weston' per servicium unius militis.

Feoda Hugonis de Albinaco, Comitis de Arundel', de honore Cestrie.

Gilbertus de Preston' tenet dimidium feodum in Preston'.

Philippus Basset tenet terciam partem unius feodi in Middilton'.

Willelmus de Fortibus tenet dimidium feodum in Rodeston'.

Galfridus de Lucy tenet unum feodum in Slapton'.

Willelmus Lungepeye et participes sui tenent unum feodum in Byfeud.


[1] Read Wardedeu.
[2] Read Ada, as in Excerpta e Rotulis Finium, vol. i. p. 342.

942 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.102-122 - cont.

Ricardus de la Hose tenet unum feodum in Jelvertoft.

Mauricius de Botindon' dimidium feodum in Botindon'.

Feoda Gilberti de Gaunt de Honore de Gaunt.

Galfridus de Armenters tenet in Kyselingbiry duo feoda.

Idem Galfridus tenet duo feoda in Stowe.

Feoda Willelmi Bardauf.

Johannes Malesoures tenet unum feodum in Middilton' et Kelentr'.

Feoda Willelmi de Fortibus, Comitis de Aubemarl'.

Willelmus de Bussehay cum Amabil' uxore sua tenent xij. partem unius feodi in Chaddeston'.

Feoda Roberti de Everingham de Honore de Lexinton'.

Simon de Pateshull' tenet unum feodum in Middelton' et Colentr'.

Feoda Willelmi de Say de Honore de Dovere.

Johannes de Hertwell', Willelmus Lupus, Nicholaus filius Philippi et Walterus Mauntel tenent duo feoda in Hertwell'.

Feoda Episcopi Lincolniensis.

Gilbertus de Segrave tenet unum feodum in Chaucumb'.

Idem episcopus dimidium feodum in Holewell'.

Feoda que fuerunt Thome Comitis de Warewic de Honore de Warewic.

Nicholaus de Nodariis et Rogerus de Whelton' tenent unum feodum in Norton'.

Rogerus Gulafr' tenet dimidium feodum in eadem villa.

Petrus de Monte Forti tenet in custodia cum herede Thome de Suhwic unum feodum in Suhwic.

Feodum quod fuit Henrici de Oylly de Honore de Hokenarton'.

Willelmus de Dyve tenet unum feodum in Wyke de herede Thome comitis de Warwic.

Feoda que fuerunt Willelmi de Albinaco de Honore de Beauver.

Petrus de Horepol tenet unum feodum in Horepol.

Thomas filius Roberti tenet dimidium feodum in Branton' [1] et Dingel'.

Robertus de Hotoft tenet viij. partem unius feodi in Karleton'.

Robertus Basset tenet terciam partem unius feodi in Riston' et Deresburc.

Willelmus Griffin et participes sui tenent octavam partem unius feodi in Stok' et Wylberdeston'.


[1] In Branton' is repeated.

NORTHAMPTON. 943

I.102-122 - cont.

Galfridus de Waundevill' tenet duas partes unius feodi in Seuewell', Bradden', et Everdon'.

S.ij.20.I.162-165.

[Copy of writ addressed to the sheriff of Wiltshire, dated 12 December, 27 Henry III. See above, pp. 719, 797.]

NORHAMTON'SIRA.

Eustachius de Wratford' j. feodum in Watford in capite de rege.

Ricardus de Lond' [1] j. feodum in capite de rege in hoc comitatu et Roteland' et aliud feodum in comitatu Bedeford' quod pertinet ad feodum de Norhamton'.

Gilbertus de Preston' dimidium feodum in Gretton' de rege in capite.

Viel Engaine cfimidium feodum in Bulewich, set dicitur quod est de feodo de Curci. [2]

Feoda Henrici de Pinkeny in hoc comitatu.

Henricus de Pinkeny dimidium feodum in dominico suo de Wapenham.

Robertus de Pinkeny dimidium feodum in Stanes de eodem.

Robertus de Wancy j. feodum in Estwell'.

Symon de Pinkeny ij. feoda in Morton' et j. feodum in Sulgrave, et j. feodum in Syresham, Estwell', Faukot'.

Philippa uxor Willelmi de Culewrthe j. feodum in Sulgrave.

Willelmus filius Willelmi de Culewrth j. feodum in Culewrthe.

Feoda Cristiane Ledet in hoc comitatu.

Eadem Cristiana j. feodum in Wardon' in dominico.

Henricus de Isham j. feodum in Isham.

Nicholaus de Cugenho j. feodum in Cugenho.

Robertus de Pavely j. feodum in Suleby quod Galfridus Dispensarius tenet de eodem Roberto.

Feoda Margerie de Ripariis in hoc comitatu.

Symon filius Symonis ij. feoda et cfimidium in Briclesworth.

Petrus Barre j. feodum in Billing'.

Symon de Loges j. feodum in Ordligeber' et Horewedene.

Philippus Basset quartam partem in Middelton'.

Prior de Esseby et Alexander de Bosco terciam partem in Atteneston'.

Ricardus Gulafr' ij. partes in Blacolvesle.

Feoda Hugonis de Ver, Comitis Oxonie, in hoc comitatu.

Walterus de Sancto Leodegaro dimidium feodum in Wald'.

Robertus Roce dimidium feodum in eadem villa


[1] Read Lindon'.
[2] Read Curtenay.

944 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.162-165 - cont.

Robertus de Hasting' dimidium feodum in eadem villa.

Jordanus le Breton' dimidium feodum in eadem villa.

Feoda Ricardi de Kaynes in hoc comitatu.

Ricardus de Fardingeston' j. feodum [1] in Purston'.

Walterus de Gatesden' j. feodum in Fardingeston'.

Hugo Luvel j. feodum in Fardingeston' et Kyselingebiri'.

Agnes [2] filia Rogeri de Heyford' j. feodum in Brinton' et Charwelton'.

Robertus Revel j. feodum in Couesgrave, Pokesi' et Tyffeld.

Feoda Honoris Peverel de Notinh' in hoc comitatu.

Willelmus de Esseby j. feodum in Catesby.

Willelmus Burdun j. feodum et dimidium in Derburg'.

Willelmus de Hauberger [3] j. feodum in Keylmers.

Robertus de Pavely ij. feoda in Westpyr', Heghtmundecot', et Hoghton'.

Petrus de Goldinton' j. feodum et dimidium in Cotes, Ravenesthorp', Teken', Holewell', Wynewik', Thimeby, et Coldesseby.

Idem Petrus et participes sui, heredes Roberti de Salceto, dimidium feodum in Horpol et Plumpton'.

Eustachius de Cantilupo ij. feoda in Bergheby.

Dominus archiepiscopus Eboracensis, custos terre et heredum Willelmi de Duston', j. feodum in Duston'.

Prior Hospitalis Sancti Johannis Ierosolyme in Anglla j. feodum in Blacolvesle.

Willelmus de Nonacurt j. feodum apud Geldeburg'.

Feoda Nigelli de Munbray in hoc comitatu.

Willelmus de Landa unum feodum et dimidium apud Welleford' cum Eustachia de Wyvill' uxore sua.

Thomas de Estleg', Ricardus de Curzum, Willelmus de Esseby j. feodum in Crek'.

Rogerus de Whelton' iij. feoda [4] in Whelton', Staverton' et Grimescot'.

Feoda Willelmi filii Hamonis in hoc comitatu.

Idem Willelmus in dominico quartam partem unius feodi in Wik'.

Alanus de Maydewell' j. feodum in Maydewell'.

Eva de Gray dimidium feodum in Thenford'.

Feoda Prioris de Coventr' in hoc comitatu.

Abbas de Pippewell' quartam partem in Coldesseby.

Prior de Daventr' dimidium feodum in Westhaddon'.


[1] A and C show all the fees of Richard de Kaynes as parva feoda.
[2] A reads Agnes que fuit uxor Rogeri.
[3] C reads rightly le Hauberger.
[4] These are parva feoda.

NORTHAMPTON. 945

S.ij.20.I.162-165 - cont.

Feoda de Honore Gloucestrie et de Clar' in hoc comitatu.

Radulfus filius Alani et Radulfus de Cameys j. feodum in Tanisoure.

Thomas de Furnellis j. feodum in Rande.

Henricus de Raunde quartam partem in Raunde.

Rogerus de Denford et Johannes de Bidun terciam [1] partem dimidii feodi in Cotes.

Nicholas de Den octavam partem in Stanern'.

Rogerus de Baskervill' dimidium feodum in Helyden'.

Ricardus filius Roberti de [2] Flore quartam partem in Heyford'.

Isabella de Berners quartam partem unius feodi in Abinton' de feodo Nicholai de Bassingebur'.

Feoda Comitis de Ferrariis in hoc comitatu.

Idem comes in dominico manerium de Hegham per servicium j. feodi.

Thomas Ebraycus [3] dimidium feodum in Bosghiate.

Ricardus de Irencestr' viij. partem in Irencestr'.

Henricus de Raunde viij. partem in Raunde.

Johanna Briwe [4] dimidium feodum in Blithesworth.

Eadem Johanna j. feodum [5] in Stok' de feodo comitis Warenne.

Petrus Barre j. feodum in Billing' de feodo Radulfi de Mortuo Mari.

Feoda Willelmi Maudut in hoc comitatu.

Willelmus de Nodare [6] j. feodum in Eston'.

Robertus Lupus dimidium feodum in Esse.

Feoda Johannis de Baiocis in hoc comitatu.

Robertus Fabaz [7] dimidium feodum in Maydewell'.

Stephanus de Bukevill' quartem partem in Wynewik'.

Feoda Hugonis Wak' in hoc comitatu.

Robertus Luvet dimidium feodum in Welleford'.

Feoda Oliveri Dayncurt in hoc comitatu,

Willelmus de Ros, abbas de Lilleshell', prior de Novo Loco juxta Stanford', tenent j. feodum et dimidium in Branteston'.

Feoda Radulfi Basset de Weledun' in hoc comitatu.

Radulfus Basset dimidium feodum in dominicis suis de Weston' et Sutton'.


[1] C. reads dimidium feodum.
[2] C. omits de Flore, and reads quintam for quartam.
[3] C. reads de Ebroicis.
[4] Read Briwere. C. reads Briwe.
[5] C. reads j. parvum feodum.
[6] Read Nodariis.
[7] Read Rabaz.

946 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.20.I.162-165 - cont.

Viel Engayne j. feodum in Blatherewich', Multon' et Bradden'.

Willelmus de Colevill' cum Hescelina de Insula, uxore sua, dimidium feodum in Braumton'.

Feodum Willelmi Bardull in hoc comitatu.

Johannes Mautravers [1] j. feodum in Middelton'.

Feoda Honoris de Aquila in hoc comitatu.

Walterus de Forho j. feodum Mort' in Forho.

Feoda honoris [2] de Crevequoer in hoc comitatu.

Felicia de Myllers duas partes unius feodi Mort' in Wyveston'. [3]

Feoda militum tenencium tam de rege quam de aliis infra hundreda et libertatem abbatis de Burgo.

S.ij.30.I.156-160.

NORHAMPTON. In libro. Scribitur per se.

De Rege in capite.

Eustachius de Watford' j. feodum in Watford'.

[Seventy-two entries not printed here for reasons stated above, p. 647.]

Felicia de Myleis duas partes unius parvi feodi in Weston'.

WARWICK AND LEICESTER.

S.ij.24.I.431-446.

Feoda Comitis de Ferariis.

In Parva Esseby dimidium feodum quod Willelmus de Leyre tenet de Willelmo de Gresel', et ipse de comite de Ferariis.

In Cungeston' j. feodum quod Robertus Mutun' tenet de Henrico de Hasteng', et ipse de eodem comite.

In Bildiston' tercia pars j. feodi quam Radulfus Grim tenet de Willelmo de Gresel', et ipse de eodem comite.

In Norton' due partes j. feodi quas idem Willelmus de Gresel' tenet de eodem comite.

In Appelb' iiijta pars j. feodi quam Ricardus de Vernun tenet de eodem comite.

In Snarkeston' iiijta pars feodi quam Simon de Bereford' tenet de Roberto de Tateshal', et ipse de eodem comite.

In Twycros dimidium feodum quod Thomas Herebert tenet de Isabella de Albiniaco, et ipsa de eodem comite.

In Gopshull' dimidium feodum quod Robertus de Grendon' et Walterus de Stretton' tenent de Roberto de Curzun, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Dicheswurth' tres partes feodi quas Gilbertus de Segrave tenet de eodem comite.


[1] Read Malesoueres with C.
[2] Read Hamonis with C.
[3] Read Weston' with C.

WARWICK AND LEICESTER. 947

S.ij.24.I.431-446 - cont.

In Bramcot', Neuton' et Durandestorp dimidium feodum quod Willelmus de Bramcot' tenet de Ricardo de Kanvill', et ipse de eodem comite.

In eadem villa de Bramcot' tercia pars feodi quam Henricus de Hasteng' tenet de eodem comite.

In Swaninton' Willelmus le Bretun dat xxxiij.d. ad scutum xl.s. et tenet de Willelmo de Gresel', et ipse de eodem comite.

In eadem Ricardus de Appelb' dat viij.d. ad scutum xl.s. et tenet de Willelmo de Picheford', et ipse de eodem comite.

In Bredon', Tunge, Wyveleston' et Andrechirch' tercia pars feodi quam Robertus de Tateshal' tenet de eodem comite.

In Wurthinton' j. feodum quod Simon de Roppel' tenet de Roesia de Verdun', et ipsa de eodem comite.

In Stanton' Haraut et Wurthinton' iiijta pars feodi quam Philippus de Stanton' tenet de eadem Roesia, et ipsa de eodem comite.

In Overton' Sauce et Swaninton' viij. pars feodi quam heres Roberti de la Sauce tenet de Philippo de Stanton', et ipse de Willelmo de Picheford', et ipse de eodem comite.

In Scheleg' dimidium feodum quod Willelmus de Rideware tenet de eodem comite.

In Parva Scheyl' dimidium feodum quod abbas de Mirivall' tenet de Willelmo de Meisham, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Stretton' viij. pars feodi quam Walterus de Stretton' tenet de Roberto de Curzun, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Cosinton' dimidium feodum quod Rogerus de Sumervill', senescallus de Monte Alto, et Willelmus de Meisham tenent de eodem comite.

In Howthton' dimidium feodum quod Ricardus Corbet tenet de Ernaldo de Bosco, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Neubolt dimidium feodum quod heres Roberti de la Sauce tenet de Willelmo Waukelin, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Sumeredeby et Parva Daleby tercia pars feodi quam Robertus de Tateshal' tenet de eodem comite.

In Caston' dimidium feodum quod idem Robertus de Tateshal' tenet de eodem comite.

In Wymundeham et Torp dimidium feodum quod Robertus de Tibetoft tenet de eodem comite.

In eisdem dimidium feodum quod heres Willelmi de Charnel' tenet de eodem comite.

In eisdem xma pars feodi quam heres Reginaldi de Torp tenet de eodem comite.

In eisdem dimidium feodum quod Radulfus Hamelin' tenet de eodem comite.

In eisdem vta pars feodi quam Hugo de Purle tenet de eodem comite.

In eisdem xma pars feodi quam Willelmus de Charnel' tenet de eodem comite.

In Etindon' j. feodum quod Sewal' de Etindon' tenet de eodem comite.

948 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.24.I.431-446 - cont.

In Aldolvestr' dinfidium. feodum quod Walterus de Ottel' tenet de eodem comite.

In Grendon' et Wytinton' j. feodum quod Robertus de Grendon' tenet de Ricardo de Kanvill', et ipse de eodem comite.

In Herberbir' j. feodum quod Odo de Herberbir' tenet de Radulfo de Picheford', et ipse de eodem comite.

In Burthton' et Schireford' j. feodum quod Henricus de Hasteng' tenet de eodem comite.

In Schepeya dimidium feodum quod Galfridus de Schepey tenet de Ricardo de Harecurt, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Thorindon' tres partes feodi quas Willelmus de Bissopesdon' tenet de Sewal' de Etindon', et ipse de predicto comite.

In Fulri dimidium feodum et vjta pars feodi que Rogerus de Fulri tenet de eodem Sewal', et ipse de eodem comite.

In Superiori Etindon' vijma pars feodi quam heres Thome de Etindon' tenet de eodem Sewal', et ipse de eodem comite.

In Estwell' dimidium feodum quod Willelmus le Bretun tenet de eodem comite.

In Appelb' iiij. pars feodi quam Willelmus de Appelby tenet de eodem comite.

Feoda Castri Ricardi.

In Farneberwe iiijta pars feodi quam Nicholaus de Say tenet de Castro Ricardi.

In Dunneschirch' dimidium feodum quod Johannes de Dunehevet tenet de predicto castro.

In Bereford' dimidium feodum quod Henricus de Nafford' tenet de Roesia de Verdon', et ipsa de eodem castro.

In Farneberwe j. feodum quod Thomas de Say tenet de eodem castro.

In eadem xx. pars feodi quam Walterus de Oclinton' tenet de eodem castro.

In Mollinton' dimidium feodum quod Agnes Cagchelewe tenet de Thoma de Arden', et ipse de eodem castro.

In eadem dimidium feodum quod prior de Kenillewurth' tenet de eodem castro.

In Ippeleg' j. feodum quod Henricus Hubald' tenet de eodem castro.

In Buninton' v. pars feodi quam Radulfus de Buninton' tenet de Willelmo de Cantilupo, et ipse de eodem castro.

In Grafton' iiijta pars feodi quam Willelmus de Grafton' tenet de Johanne de Sturmy, et ipse de Willelmo de Curly, et ipse de dicto castro.

In Bilney iiij. pars feodi quam abbas de Cumb' et Galfridus de Bilney tenent de eodem castro.

Feoda Radulfi Basset de Weledon'.

In Rakedal' et Wylus dimidium feodum quod Radulfus Baaaet de Draiton' tenet de eodem Radulfo Basset de Weledon'.

WARWICK AND LEICESTER. 949

S.ij.24.I.431-446 - cont.

In Dunton' dues [1] partes j. feodi quas idem Radulfus Basset de Draiton' tenet de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Weleham' tercia pars j. feodi quam idem Radulfus Basset de Weledon' tenet de rege.

In Slawston' iijta pars j. feodi quam Hugo de Neyvill' tenet de Roberto de Tateshal', et ipse de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In eadem et in Ilveston' xijma pars j. feodi quam Ivo le Chamberlein tenet de Radulfo le Chamberlein, et ipse de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Torp iiijta pars j. feodi quam Johannes de Halsted' tenet de Roberto de Tateshal', et ipse de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Holewell' et Ketelby dimidium feodum quod Robertus de Tateshal' tenet de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Reresby tercia pars j. feodi quam Radulfus le Chamberlein tenet de Radulfo Basset de Drayton', et ipse de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Ilveston' et Actorp vja pars j. feodi quam idem Radulfus le Chamberlein tenet de eodem Radulfo Basset de Draiton' et ipse de Radulfo Basset de Weledon'.

In Fleken' iiijta pars j. feodi quam heres Ivonis de Fleken' tenet de Burga de Bendeng', et ipsa de Roberto de Tateshal'. et ipse de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Parva Esseby viijta pars j. feodi quam Robertus de Folevill' tenet de Roesia de Verdun', et ipsa de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Parva Pedling' iiij,a pars j. feodi quam abbas de Mirivall' tenet de Willelmo de Pedling', et ipse de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Cosseby, Leyre et Frolleswurth' tres partes dimidii militis quas Stephanus Dan vers tenet de Roberto de Tateshal', et ipse de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Overton' Quatermars viijva pars j. feodi quam Galfridus Maurewart tenet de Radulfo Basset de Draiton', et ipse de predicto Radulfo Basset de Weledon'.

In Fleken' vj'a pars j. feodi quam Roesia de Verdon' tenet de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In eadem viijva pars j. feotfi quam Margeria de Charnel' tenet de Roberto de Grendon', et ipse de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In eadem xij. pars j. feodi quam Hugo Peverel et Ricardus le Venur tenent de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Gouteby dimidium feodum quod Radulfus Basset de Drayton' tenet de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Wymundeham iiij. pars feodi quam Ricardus le More tenet de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Herdeby et Stakethirne xij. pars feodi quam Willelmus filius Radulfi tenet de Roberto de Hotoft, et ipse de Willelmo de Aleby, et ipse de Roberto de Tateshal', et ipsede eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Swyneford' et Walecot' iij. pars feodi quam Hospitalarii Ierosolyme tenent de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.

In Magna Petling' Adam Muschet dat iij.s. ad scutum xl.s. et tenet de eodem Radulfo de Weledon'.


[1] So in MS.

950 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.24.I.431-446 - cont.

Feoda Johannis filii Alani.

In Lalleford' Heyrun j. feodum quod Rogerus Heyrun tenet de eodem Johanne.

In Wullricheston' j. feodum quod Agatha Extranea et Sibilla soror eius tenent de eodem Johanne.

In Stretton' dimidium feodum quod heres Radulfi Extranei tenet de eodem Johanne.

Feodum Willelmi filii Hamundi.

In Lutterwurth', Minstreton' et Torp unum feodum quod Roesia de Verdon' tenet de eodem Willelmo.

Feodum Willelmi de Bruer.

In Twyford' et Torp dimidium feodum quod Radulfus de Secchevill' tenet de Willelmo de Bruer.

Feodum Comitis Gloucestrie.

In Bikemers j. feodum quod Robertus Foliot tenet de eodem comite.

Feodum Roberti de Sancto Johanne.

In Benton' j. feodum quod Rogerus de Craft tenet de eodem Roberto.

Feodum Willelmi de Hastinges.

In Haselover' dimidium feodum quod Robertus de Haselover' tenet de eodem Willelmo.

Feodum Abbatis de Seleby.

In Stormwurth' tres partes j. feodi quas abbas de Seleby tenet de rege.

Feoda Roberti de Stafford'.

In Hertwic dimidium feodum quod heres Radulfi de Mora tenet de Roberto de Stafford'.

In Magna Wulleward dimidium feodum quod Hawisia de Wulleward tenet de predicto Roberto.

In Parva Wulleward dimidium feodum quod Ingeram de Wulleward tenet de predicto Roberto.

In Buminton' j. feodum quod Adam de Grenevill' tenet de Hawisia de Wulleward, et ipsa de predicto Roberto.

In Dicheford dimidium feodum quod Fraricus1 de Dicheford tenet de Viviano de Standon', et ipse de predicto Roberto.

In Westcote dimidium feodum quod Galfridus de Mandevil' tenet de predicto Roberto.


[1] Faricus. Fraricus extended in the other contemporary version. He is called Frethericus in Close Rolls, 1234-1237, p. 341.

WARWICK AND LEICESTER. 951

S.ij.24.I.431-446 - cont.

In Wullewardinton' iij. pars j. feodi quam Vivianus de Standon' tenet de predicto Roberto.

In Edricheston' dimidium feodum quod Petrus de Monte Forti tenet de predicto Roberto.

In Langel' et Norton' j. feodum quod Willelmus de Curly tenet de predicto Roberto.

In Moreton' dimidium feodum quod Willelmus Trussel et Robertus Bagot tenent de predicto Roberto.

In Ofwurth' dimidium feodum quod Willelmus Blaunfrunt tenet de predicto Roberto.

In Bubenhull' ij. partes j. feodi quas comes Warr' tenet de predicto Roberto.

In Waver Rogeri dimidium feodum quod Radulfus de Mora tenet de predicto Roberto.

In Neuton' vj. pars j. feodi quam abbas de Cumba tenet de predicto Roberto.

In Barton' xvj. pars feodi quam Ricardus le Frankeleyn tenet de eodem Roberto.

In Wulavinton' Ricardus de Barton' dat xxx.d. ad scutum duarum marcarum de feodis Stafford'.

In Hethincumpton' cfimidium feodum quod Robertus de Haleford' tenet de Rogero le Poer, et ipse de Ernaldo de Bosco, et ipse de eodem Roberto.

In Witeleg' due partes j. feodi quas Willelmus Durevassall' et Rogerus de Wytel' tenent de Petro de Monte Forti, et de Willelmo de Lucy, et ipsi de eodem Roberto.

In Cotes dimidium feodum quod abbas de Cumba tenet de Willelmo Trussell', et ipse de heredibus Radulfi de Mora, et ipsi de eodem Roberto.

Feodum de Touney.

In Stretton' dimidium feodum quod heres Willelmi le Bretun tenet de predicto Radulfo de Touney.

Feoda Rogeri de Mubray.

In Olestorp', Bidmeswell' et Wauton' j. feodum quod Jacobus de Biseck' tenet de predicto Rogero.

In Linle iiij. pars j. feodi quam Willelmus de Rudevill' tenet de predicto Rogero.

In Queniburg' et Burton' j. feodum quod Ricardus de Curzun tenet de predicto Rogero.

In Picwell' et Lichestorp' iij. feoda que Hugo de Morwy, Johannes de Sproxton', et heres Henrici de Setgrave tenent de predicto Rogero.

In Kirkeby iij. partes j. feodi quas prior de Kirckeby tenet de predicto Rogero.

In Oleby viij. pars j. feodi quam Robertus de Deyvill' tenet de predicto Rogero.

In Guoteby dimidium feodum quod Robertus de Ver tenet de predicto Rogero.

952 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.24.I.431-446 - cont.

In Sustock' j. feodum quod heredes Rogeri de Kanvil' tenent de predicto Rogero.

In Hapsford' iiij. pars j. feodi et xx. pars j. feodi quas Robertus Hasteng' tenet de predicto Rogero.

In Newham j. feodum quod Ricardus de Curzun tenet de predicto Rogero.

In Cetrestwaver j. feodum quod Robertus de Waver tenet de Ricardo de Curzun, et ipse de predicto Rogero.

In Ketelby et Burton' dimidium feodum quod Willelmus Beler tenet de predicto Rogero.

In Norton' dimidium feodum quod Ricardus de Norton' tenet de predicto Rogero.

In Neuton' iij. partes j. feodi et viij. pars j. feodi quas Willelmus Burdet tenet de Willelmo de Esseby, et ipse de predicto Rogero.

In Kirckeby super Wreic iij. partes j. feodi quas Robertus de Day vill' tenet de predicto Rogero.

In Aston Perer vij. pars feodi quam Hugo de Pirariis tenet de predicto Rogero.

In Hampton' in Arden' dimidium feodum quod Hugo de Arden' tenet de eodem Rogero.

In Notehurst v. para feodi quam Robertus de Hasteng' tenet de predicto Rogero.

In Hampton' in Arden' iiij. pars feodi quam Petrus de Monte Forti tenet de eodem Rogero.

In Chadeleswiz viij. para feodi quam idem Petrus de Monte Forti tenet de eodem Rogero.

In Friseby dimidium feodum quod Hugo Dispensator tenet de eodem Rogero.

Feoda Hugonis Wack'.

In Kyleby dimidium feodum quod Willelmus de Kyleby tenet de herede Hugonis Wack'.

In Sproxton' iiij. para feodi quam Hugo de Boby tenet de eodem herede.

Feoda Isabelle de Brus.

In Esseby Folevill' ij. feoda que Euatachiua de Folevil' tenet de predicta Isabella.

In Sproxton' dimidium feodum quod Johannes de Sproxton' tenet de predicta Isabella.

In Sixtenby et Aleby iij. partes j. feodi et viij. pars.j. feodi quas Hugo de Pirariis tenet de predicta Isabella.

Feodum de Hocham.

In Knossinton' iiijor partes dimidii militis quas Robertus de Tateshal' tenet de domina de Hocham.

WARWICK AND LEICESTER. 953

S.ij.24.I.431-446 - cont.

Feoda Willelmi de Bello Campo.

In Norton' dimidium feodum quod Alanus filius Henrici tenet de predicto Willelmo.

In Tilton' dimidium feodum quod Anna que fuit uxor Roberti de Digeby tenet de predicto Willelmo.

In Neuton' et Musel' dimidium feodum et v. pars j. feodi quas Johannes de Neuton' tenet de predicto Willelmo.

In Ilveston' v. para j. feodi quam heres Johannis de Neuton' tenet de predicto Willelmo.

Feoda Abbatis de Abbendon'.

In Kingeston' j. feodum quod Willelmus de Ley tenet de predicto abbate.

In Hulle vj. pars j. feodi quam Hugo de Abbendon' tenet de predicto abbate.

In eadem vj. pars j. feodi quam Willelmus de Curly tenet de predicto abbate.

Feoda de Lancastr'.

In Harestan' unum feodum quod Robertus de Harestan' tenet de honore de Lancastr'.

In Brocton' j. feodum quod Petrus de Mora tenet de eodem honore.

Feoda de Beuver.

In Barkeby, Hungreton', Croxton', Hamelton', Queneby et Thorp' iij. partes j. feodi quas Petrus de Lincofiiia tenet de herede de Beauver.

In Lubehow dimidium feodum quod Ricardus de Bramton' tenet de predicto herede.

In Normanton' iiij. pars j. feodi quam Willelmus de Colevil' tenet de Waltero de Colevil', et ipse de predicto herede.

In Muston' j. feodum quod Willelmus de Colevil' tenet de Waltero de Colevil', et ipse de predicto herede.

In eadem xl. pars j. feodi quam Radulfus de Charnel' tenet de predicto herede.

In eadem iiij. pars j. feodi quam Andreas de Muston' tenet de predicto herede.

In Botlesford ifij. pars j. feodi quam Willelmus de Wunby tenet de predicto herede.

In eadem xvj. pars j. feodi quam Willelmus filius Warini tenet de predicto herede.

In eadem, Muston', Redmild et Plumgar dimidium feodum quod Willelmus de Hotoft tenet de predicto herede.

In eadem xxxij. pars j. feodi quam Radulfus de Karleton' tenet de predicto herede.

In eadem xl. pars j. feodi quam Rogerus Wade tenet de predicto herede.

In Redmilde viij. pars j. feodi quam Petrus de Harepoll' tenet de predicto herede.

In eadem xvj. pars j. feodi quam Robertus de Offinton' tenet de predicto herede.

954 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.24.I.431-446 - cont.

In eadem xxxij. pars j. feodi quam Robertus filius Ricardi tenet de predicto herede.

In eadem xxxij. pars j. feodi quam Robertus filius Willelmi tenet de predicto herede.

In eadem xxxij. pars j. feodi quam Osbertus de Kay no we tenet de predicto herede.

In eadem xxij.d. obolus ad scutum xl.s. quod Willelmus Chapelein, Alanus de Starvil', et Stephanus Staker tenent de predicto herede.

In Barkeston' et Plungar tres partes feodi quas heres Odinelli de Albiniaco tenet de eodem herede.

In eisdem j. feodum quod Theobaldus de Bellehus tenet de eodem herede.

In Stakethirne dimidium feodum et lx. pars j. feodi que Simon Borart tenet de eodem herede.

In Gnipton' et Redmilde iiijta pars feodi quam Johannes de Gnipton' tenet de Simone de Roppel', et ipse de eodem herede.

In eisdem viij. pars feodi quam Thomas de Bracy tenet de Roberto de Bracy, et ipse de Petro de Lincolnia, et ipse Petrus de eodem herede.

In eadem villa de Redmilde x. pars j. feodi quam Robertus Dive tenet de eodem herede.

In Herdeby et Stakethirne j. feodum quod Robertus le Bret tenet de eodem herede.

In eadem villa de Herdeby tres partes j. feodi quas Gerardus de Fanecurt tenet de eodem herede.

In Howes viij. pars j. feodi quam Radulfus de Charnel' tenet de Petro de Lincolnia, et ipse de predicto herede.

In Claxston' j. feodum quod Simon de Roppel' tenet de eodem herede.

In Botlesford' viij. pars feodi quam Ricardus de Saxindal' tenet de eodem herede.

In eadem et Barkiston' iiij. pars feodi et xl. pars feodi quas Willelmus de Huntedon' tenet de eodem herede.

In eadem lx. pars feodi quam Fulco de Hotot tenet de eodem herede.

In Medburn' et Slaweston' j. feodum quod heres Willelmi de Chaurs tenet de eodem herede.

Feoda Prioris de Coventr'.

In Burbache, Barewell', Shetesclive et Burchinbir' ij. feoda que Henricus de Hatinges tenet de priore de Coventr'.

In Greneberwe j. feodum quod Ricardus de Harecurt et Alicia Croc tenent de eodem priore.

In Leminton' dimidium feodum quod prior de Kenillewurth' tenet de eodem priore de Coventr'.

In Schuckeberwe dimitfium feodum quod Simon de Schuckeberwe tenet de eodem priore.

In eadem dimidium feodum quod Radulfus Chat' tenet de eodem priore.

WARWICK AND LEICESTER. 965

S.ij.24.I.431-446 - cont.

In Napton' dimidium feodum quod Hugo filius Laurencii tenet de eodem priore.

In Cobinton' dimidium feodum quam [1] Henricus de Cobinton' tenet de eodem priore.

In Cherlecot' iiij. pars feodi quam Willelmus de Lucy tenet de eodem priore.

In Sowe xl. pars feodi quam Simon Jeulanus tenet de eodem priore.

In Brademor x. pars feodi quam Willelmus de Timor et Johannes de Brademor tenent de eodem priore.

In Wasperton' ifij. pars j. feodi quam Willelmus de Lucy tenet de eodem priore.

Idem prior de Coventr' respondet de dominico suo pro tribus partibus dimidii militis, videlicet in Merston', Wasperton', Coventr', Scrapetoft, Pakinton' et Suham.

Feoda domini Regis.

In Brome xma pars j. feodi quam Robertus le Faukener tenet de domino rege in capite.

In Occesilve j. feodum quod Adam de Periton' tenet de domino rege in capite.

In Kegwurth' dimidium feodum quod Robertus Patric tenet de domino rege in capite.

Feoda Comitis Warr'.

In Brentingestorp ij. feoda que Willelmus de Brentingestorp et abbas de Mirivall' tenent de Willelmo Fitun, et ipse de Roesia de Verdun, et ipsa de predicto comite.

In Avendercet' j. feodum quod heres Andree Giffart tenet de predicta Roesia, et ipsa de eodem comite.

In Bereford' dimidium feodum quod Henricus de Nafford' tenet de eadem Roesia, et ipsa de eodem comite.

In Scheldon' dimidium feodum quod heres Ansell' de Scheldon' tenet de eadem Roesia, et ipsa de eodem comite.

In Thurlaweston' j. feodum quod Johannes de Thurlaweston' tenet de eadem Roesia, et ipsa de eodem comite.

In Button' j. feodum quod Philippus de Esseby et Robertus de Verdun et Robertus de Gersal' tenent de eadem Roesia, et ipsa de eodem comite.

In Lillinton' j. feodum quod Petrus de Wulwardinton' tenet de eadem Roesia, et ipsa de eodem comite.

In Hassesho et Caldecot' dimidium feodum quod Galfridus de Simily tenet de eadem Roesia, et ipsa de eodem comite

In Brandon' dimidium feodum quod eadem Roesia tenet de eodem comite.

In Wetinton' j. feodum quod Thomas de Estleg' tenet de predicto comite Warr'.

In Astleg', Moreton' et Milvreton' j. feodum quod idem Thomas tenet de eodem comite.


[1] Read quod.

966 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.24.I.431-446 - cont.

In Merston' Jabet dimidium feodum quod heres Henrici Jabet tenet de predicto Thoma, et ipse de eodem comite.

Willelmus filius Hamundi tenet dimidium feodum de predicto comite in Moreton'.

Ricardus de Amundevill' tenet j. feodum de eodem comite in Bercleswell' et Liththirn'.

Robertus filius Willelmi de Olinhal' tenet iiijtm partem feodi de predicto comite in Olenhal'.

Heres Willelmi de Warr' tenet x. partem j. feodi de predicto comite in suburbio Warr'.

Gilbertus de Segrave tenet vj. partem j. feodi de predicto comite in Brel'. .

Heres Radulfi de Mora tenet j. feodum de predicto comite in Lockesleg'.

Robertus de Deyvill' tenet j. feodum et dimidium de predicto comite, in Walton' j. feodum et in Wintreton' dimidium feodum.

Heres Thome Murdac tenet j. feodum de predicto comite in Cumpton'.

Johannes de Hercy tenet j. feodum de predicto comite in Pilardinton'.

Johannes le Vavasur tenet dimidium feodum de predicto comite in Northburg'.

In Wytechirch' j. feodum quod Petrus de Monte Forti tenet de predicto comite.

In Wellesburn' j. feodum quod idem Petrus tenet de eodem comite.

In Cherlecot' cfimidium feodum quod Willelmus de Lucy tenet de eodem Petro, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Brells iiij. pars feodi quam idem Petrus tenet de eodem comite.

In Wutton' j. feodum quod heres Galfridi le Sauvage tenet de Thoma de Clinton', et ipse de predicto comite.

In Merton' j. feodum quod Thomas de Clinton' tenet de predicto comite.

In Sniterfeld' j. feodum quod Johannes de Cantilupo tenet de predicto Thoma, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Burthingbur' dimidium feodum quod idem Thomas de Clinton' tenet de eodem comite.

In Dercetehill' ifij. pars feodi quam idem Thomas tenet de eodem comite.

In Cuntastorp j. feodum quod Henricus de Lodbroc tenet de Thoma de Arden', et ipse de predicto comite.

In Rottel' j. feodum quod idem Thomas de Arden' tenet de eodem comite.

In Fennicumpton' dimidium feodum quod heres Ricardi Peche tenet de predicto Thoma, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Barton' iiij. pars feodi quam Robertus Marescallus et Ricardus le Eyr tenent de predicto Thoma, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Cumpton' Wintace [1] dimidium feodum quod Thomas de Cumpton' tenet de predicto Thoma de Arden', et ipse de predicto comite.


[1] Read Whincate.

WARWICK AND LEICESTER. 957

S.ij.24.I.431-446 - cont.

In Pakinton' Prioris iij. pars j. feodi quam prior de Kenillewurth' tenet de predicto Thoma, et ipse de predicto comite.

In Rokeby dimidium feodum quod idem Thomas de Arden' tenet de predicto comite.

In Wyleby v. pars feodi quam idem Thomas de Arden' tenet de eodem comite.

In Walecot' v. pars feodi quam Warinus de Walecot' tenet de predicto Thoma, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Napton' x. pars feodi quam idem Thomas tenet de eodem comite.

In eadem dimidium feodum quod idem Thomas tenet de eodem comite.

In Redburn' x. pars feodi quam idem Thomas tenet de eodem comite.

In Hodenhull' Gurmunt v. para feodi quam Thomas Gurmunt tenet de predicto Thoma, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Schutenhodenhull' dimidium feodum quod Simon de Hodenhull' tenet de predicto Thoma, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Batkinton' dimidium feodum quod Radulfus Basset de Drayton' tenet de predicto Thoma, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Holm viij. pars feodi quam predictus Thomas de Arden' tenet de eodem comite.

In Wyleby dimidium feodum quod Willelmus le Yreis tenet de predicto comite.

In Bedewurth' Wylie cum x. virgatis terre in Schameford' et ijbus virgatis terre in Frolleawurth' j. feodum quod Thomas de Bedewurth' tenet de Rogero de Craft et Johanne Mace, et ipsi de predicto comite Warr'.

In Folebroc et Wodecot' dimidium feodum quod iidem Rogerus et Johannes tenent de eodem comite.

In Chelmundecot' dimidium feodum quod predicti Rogerus et Johannes tenent de eodem comite.

In Parva Lalleford' v. pars feodi quam predictus Rogerus de Craft tenet de predicto comite.

In Preston' j. feodum quod Simon de Stok' et plures alii tenent de herede Simonis Bagod, et ipse de Hospitalariis Ierosolyme, et ipsi de eodem comite.

In Schoteswell' j. feodum quod Robertus Waundart tenet de Wydone filio Roberti, et ipse de eodem comite.

In eadem iiij. pars feodi quam Wydo filius Roberti tenet de eodem comite.

Hatton' et Beusal' xl. pars feodi quam Thomas de Clinton' tenet de eodem comite.

In Parva Glen iiij. pars feodi quam Robertus de Karentemp tenet de Ricardo de Harecurt, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Moreton' j. feodum quod Willelmus de Martwast, Henricus de Lodbroc et Willelmus Panzun tenent de eodem Ricardo, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Baddel' dimidium feodum quod idem Ricardus tenet de eodem comite.

958 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.24.I.431-446 - cont.

In Baxterel' vj. pars feodi quam idem Ricardus tenet de eodem comite.

In Wilmeleyton' j. feodum quod heres Ricardi Peche tenet de eodem Ricardo, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Wulvey dimidium feodum et v. pars feodi cum Copston' que idem Ricardus de Harecurt tenet de eodem comite.

In Wiginhill' et Chiriton' j. feodum quod Radulfus de Wrylinton' tenet de predicto comite.

In Elmedon' dimidium feodum quod Simon de Wytacre tenet de Hugone de Arden', et ipse de eodem comite.

In Wilmundecot' iiij. pars feodi quam heres Willelmi de Canvill' tenet de eodem comite.

In Sekindon' dimidium feodum quod idem heres tenet de eodem comite.

In eadem iiij. pars feodi quam idem heres tenet de eodem comite.

In Manecestr' dimidium feodum quod Hugo de Manecestr' tenet de Henrico de Hasteng', et ipse de eodem comite.

In Witacr' x. pars feodi quam Simon de Witacre tenet de eodem comite.

In Burleg' j. feodum quod Johannes de Cantilupo tenet de eodem comite. ,

In Stotleg' ifij. pars feodi quam idem Willelmus [1] tenet de eodem comite.

In eadem xvj. pars feodi quam idem Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet de eodem comite.

In Copton' [2] dimidium feodum quod Simon de Bruly tenet de eodem comite.

In Ecleshal' v. pars feodi quam Robertus de Eclessal' et Radulfus de Buninton' tenent de Galfrido Pancefot, et ipse de Willelmo de Cantilupo, et ipse de herede Galfridi Corbazun de Hunningham, et ipse de predicto comite.

In Grafton' dimidium feodum quod Henricus de Nafford' tenet de predicto comite.

In Upton' j. feodum quod Mauricius le Butiler tenet de eodem comite.

In Billisleg' j. feodum quod Willelmus Trussel [3] de predicto Mauricio le Butiler, et ipse de eodem comite.

In Suckeberwe tres partes feodi quas Willelmus de Cantilupo tenet de Eustachio de Mortun. et ipse de Wydone filio Roberti, et ipse de Wydone de Dive, et ipse de predicto comite.

In Lodbroc j. feodum quod Henricus de Lodbroc tenet de eodem comite.

In eadem dimidium feodum quod heredes Henrici Bocher tenent de eodem comite.

In Lodinton' iiij. pars feodi quam Willelmus de Lodinton' [3] de eodem comite.


[1] For idem Willelmus, read Willelmus de Cantilupo.
[2] Read Cocton'.
[3] Supply tenet.

WARWICK AND LEICESTER. 959

S.ij.24.I.431-446 - cont.

In Radeford' dimidium feodum quod Galfridus de Simily tenet de eodem comite.

In Haleford' dimidium feodum quod heres Andree Giffart tenet de eodem comite.

In Draiton' dimidium feodum quod Simon de Draiton' tenet de eodem comite.

In Herberbir' j. feodum quod Robertus le Megre tenet de Henrico de Lodbroc, et ipse de predicto comite.

In Hunningham iiij. pars feodi quam Robertus de Deyvill' tenet de Willelmo de Cantilupo, et ipse de herede Galfridi Corbazun, et ipse de eodem comite.

Feoda de Suley.

In Magna Dercet j. feodum quod heres Radulfi de Suley tenet de domino rege in capite.

In eadem dimidium feodum quod Radulfus de Knittecot' tenet de eodem herede.

In eadem dimidium feodum quod Ricardus de Suley tenet de eodem herede.

[Endorsed:-] Rotulus de compoto, etc. (illegible). Warr', Leycestr'. In libro. Continet xix. pecias cum uno transcripto et una pecia de Testa de Nevill'.

WORCESTER.

S.ij.23.I.178-179.

Hec est inquisicio facta de scutagio in comitatu Wigomie per sacramentum Symonis de Frankeleg', Hugonis de Belne, Walteri de Stanes, Radulfi de Sutthinton', Ricardi Pancefot, Ricardi de Bocclinton', Willelmi de Kynton', Ricardi de Coston', Ricardi de Karsy, Johannis de Sutton', Thome de Hanlega, Johannis le Waleis. Dicunt per sacramentum quod

Feoda Honoris Castri Ricardi que Willelmus de Stuttevill' tenet. In rotulo,

In Yedefen Loges quarta pars unius feodi quod Willelmus de Loges tenet de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In Cure Wyard dimidium feodum quod Johannes Wiard tenet de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In Temettebyr' dimidium feodum quod Rogerus de Clifford tenet de Waltero de Clifford, Walterus de Clifford de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In Holreton' dimidium feodum quod Ricardus de Karsy tenet de Willelmo de Wasseburne, Willelmus de Rogero de Clifford, Rogerus de Waltero de Clifford, Walterus de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In Sapi Pichard quarta pars unius feodi quod Milo Pichard tenet de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

960 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.178-179 - cont.

In eadem villa de Sapi est quarta pars unius feodi quod Johannes Sturmi tenet de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In Clifton' unum feodum quod Robertus de Clifton' tenet de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In Seldesleg' le Waleis dimidium feodum quod Johannes le Waleis tenet de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In Stanford Esturmi quarta pars unius feodi quod Johannes Sturmi tenet de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In Karkeden' quarta pars unius feodi quod Hugo de Milevile tenet de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In Ymeneye unum feodum quod Willelmus Corbet tenet de Thoma Corbet, Thomas Corbet de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In Astwode Roberti dimidium feodum quod Robertus de Astwode tenet de Thoma Corbet, Thomas Corbet de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In Elmrugge quarta pars unius feodi quod Ynardus de Elmrugge tenet de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In eadem villa est decima pars unius feodi quod Reginaldus de Hanewode tenet de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In Purshull' dimidium feodum quod Johannes de Munvirun tenet de Willelmo de Stuttevill', ipse de domino rege.

In Croele unum feodum quod Walterus Haket tenet de Rogero le Poher, Rogerus le Poher de W. de Bello Campo, ipse de Willelmo de Stuttevill', Willelmus de domino rege.

Baronia Abbatis de Persora. In rotulo.

In Beleg' unum feodum quod Robertus filius Nicholai tenet de Willelmo de Bello Campo, Willelmus de abbate de Persora, ipse de domino rege.

In Goldicote unum feodum de quo Petrus de Wike tenet medietatem de abbate de Persora in eadem villa et Laurencius de Goldicote aliam medietatem de eodem, ipse abbas de domino rege.

Baronia de Tony. In rotulo.

In Estham unum feodum quod Baudwinus de Rumeni tenet de heredibus de Tony, heredes de Tony de domino rege.

In Scraueleg' unum feodum quod Rogerus le Poher tenet de Willelmo de Bello Campo, Willelmus de heredibus de Tony, heredes de Tony de domino rege.

In Stanford Wasseburne due partes unius feodi quas Willelmus de Wasseburne tenet de domina Matillide de Treuegoyd, ipsa de Waltero de Crauele, Walterus de Waltero de Clifford, Walterus de heredibus de Tony, heredes de Tony de domino rege.

In Hadeshore dimidium feodum quod Willelmus filius Warini tenet de heredibus de Tony, ipsi de domino rege.

Baronia Radulfi de Mortuo Mari. In rotulo.

In Ribbesford tres partes unius feodi quas Henricus de Ribbesford tenet de Radulfo de Mortuo Mari, Radulfus de domino rege.

WORCESTER. 961

S.ij.23.I.178-179 - cont.

In Sutthinton' dimidium feodum quod Radulfus de Sutthinton' tenet de Radulfo de Mortuo Mari, idem Radulfus de domino rege.

Feoda Comitis Glovernie. In rotulo.

In Hanleg' Thome due partes unius feodi quas Thomas de Hanleg' tenet de Willelmo de la Mara, Willelmus de comite Glovernie, comes de domino rege.

In Doddeham dimidium feodum quod Willelmus le Mauns tenet de Willelmo de la Mara. Willelmus de comite Glovernie, comes de domino rege.

In Rudmarleg' dimidium feodum quod Ada de Rudmarleg' tenet de Johanne filio Galfridi, Johannes de Willelmo de Bello Campo, Willelmus de Bello Campo de Willelmo de la Mare, Willelmus de la Mare de comite Glovernie, comes de domino rege.

Feoda Honoria de Clifford. In rotulo.

In Rudmarleg' Olifar unum feodum quod Robertus Olifard de honore de Clifford, et ignorat inquisicio utrum dabit scutagium necne, eo quod facit wardam apud Clifford.

In Berewe dimidium feodum quod Johannes de la Berewe tenet per idem servicium.

In Wernesleg' dimidium feodum quod Johannes de Wernesleg' tenet de eodem feodo per idem servicium.

In Mora dimidium feodum quod Johannes de Mora tenet de eodem feodo per idem servicium.

Baronia W. de Bello Campo. In rotulo.

In Chadelewick et Willingwick unum feodum quod Radulfus de Lenz tenet de Willelmo de Bello Campo, ipse de domino rege.

In Benetleg' dimidium feodum quod Ricardus Pancefot tenet de Willelmo de Bello Campo, ipse de domino rege.

In Grafton' unum feodum quod Johannes de Grafton' tenet de eodem, ipse de domino rege.

In Upton' unum feodum quod Willelmus filius Warini tenet de eodem, ipse de domino rege.

In Kokeseye et Wodecote cfimidium feodum de quo Walterus de Kokeseye tres partes illius dimidii feodi tenet de W. de Bello Campo in Kokeseye et Ricardus de Munvirun quartam partem in Wodecote de eodem.

In Russoc dimidium feodum quod Galfridus Sturmi tenet de domino W. de Bello Campo, ipse de domino rege.

In Stanes dimidium feodum quod Walterus de Stanes tenet de W. de Bello Campo, ipse de domino rege.

In Hampton' unum feodum quod Henricus Luvet tenet de eodem, ipse de domino rege.

In Doverdale dimidium feodum quod Willelmus et Hugo Blundus de Doverdale tenent de Ricardo de Omresleg', Ricardus de domino W. de Bello Campo, idem W. de domino rege.

962 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.23.I.178-179 - cont.

In Cofton' dimidium feodum quod Ricardus de Cofton' tenet de domino W. de Bello Campo, ipse de domino rege.

Isti habent brevia de acutagfis auis habendis in comitatu Wigornie:-

Episcopus Wigorniensis.

Episcopus Herefordensis.

Abbas Westmonasterii.

Abbas Evesh'.

Comes Marscallus.

Warinus de Monchenesi.

Simon de Monteforti.

Rogerus de Sumeri.

Galfridus Dispenaator.

Wygorn'. In libro.

SALOP AND STAFFORD.

[SALOP.]

S.ij.25.I.202-215.

Baronia J. filii Alani. In rotulo.

Herbertus Mauveisin tenet dimidium feudum in Berewik'.

Th. de Roshale j. feodum et dimidium in Roshale cum pertinenciis.

Walterus Hosey dimidium feodum in Adbricton'.

Willelmus Banastre cfimidium feodum in Hadenhale, Hauston' cum pertinenciis.

Eynon filius Owein dimidium feodum in Franketon'.

Reynerus de Acton' dimidium feodum in Acton', Grineleshul.

Robertus de Esple quartam partem feodi in Hopton'.

Henricus de Auditheleg' quartam partem feodi in Merchomleg'.

Stephanus de Stanton' ij. feoda in Stanton', Rodene et Preston'.

Johannes de Chetewind ij. feoda in Chetewind cum pertinenciis.

Rogerus de Appeleg' et participes sui dimidium feodum in Rodinton'.

Th. de Costentin j. feodum in Eton' et Aldebur'.

Ricardus de Lecton' j. feodum in Lecton'.

Petronilla de Kenleg' j. feodum in Kenleg' cum pertinenciis.

Adam de Muneton' quartam partem feodi in Wilvreston'.

Willelmus Honaud quartam partem feodi in Frodesleg'.

Willelmus Marescot dimidium feodum in Eton'.

Walterus de Huggeford iiij. feoda in Huggeford cum pertinencus.

Willelmus de Alta Ripa dimidium feodum in Kembricton'.

Johannes de Beckebur' octavam partem feodi in Beckebur'.

Robertus de Dodinton' dimidium feodum in Dodinton'.

Philippus Boterel j. feodum in Aston'.

Symon de Frankeleg' dimidium feodum in Eudon' Maleseuers.

Willelmus de Cridelton' dimidium feodum in Cridelton'.

Hugo de Opton' dimidium feodum in Opton'.

SALOP AND STAFFORD. 963

S.ij.25.I.202-215 - cont.

Willelmus filius Aer j. feodum in Eston'.

Ricardus de Thonclond dimidium feodum in Thoncland.

Thomas de Esthop' dimidium feodum in Esthop'.

Robertus de Brocton' dimidium feodum in Brocton'.

Thomas Corbet dimidium feodum in Tasseleg'.

Johannes Extraneus ij. feoda in Mhutle et Parva Erkalawe.

Summa xxiiij. feoda et viija.

Baronia de Cloune. In rotulo.

Johannes de Gay j. feodum in Gay.

Symon de Hauborthin dimidium feodum in Cloune Goneford.

Rogerus Waudin dimidium feodum in Langefeud.

Gilebertus de Bockenhul j. feodum in Bockenhul et Posselawe.

Walterus de Hopton' ij. feoda in Hopton'.

Henricus de Sibbeton' j. feodum in Sibbeton'.

Egidius de Barkele et Johannes de Sellac j. feodum in Weston'.

Hugo Anglicus j. feodum in Clounebur'.

Henricus et Nicholaus de Egedon' j. feodum in Egedon'.

Henricus de Maskelin dimidium feodum in Munede.

Baronia R. de Mortuomari. In rotulo.

Radulfus de Mortuomari j. feodum in Claibur'.

Radulfus de la Lawe j. feodum in La Lawe.

Willelmus de Sancto Georgio j. feodum in Nene et Eudon'.

Briain de Bromton' j. feodum in Kinlet'.

Robertus de Wodeton' et Rogerus de Borewardesleg' j. feodum in Hugeleg'.

Willelmus de Forda et Thomas de Bardeleg' dimidium feodum in Cackesleg' cum pertinenciis.

Radulfus de Arras ij. feoda in Sodbyr' et Nenton'.

Galfridus de Overton' j. feodum in Overton', Eudon' et Comleg'.

Thomas de Costentin terciam partem feodi in Borewarton'.

Galfridus de Ledwiz j. feodum in Ruge.

Hugo de Shenton' duas partes feodi in Shenton'.

Philippus de Mortuomari j. feodum in Sete et Lecton'.

Nicholaus de Hintes dimidium feodum in Welleford.

Robertus Bagard dimidium feodum in Hop'.

Ernulfus de Kamaron terciam partem feodi in La Steple.

Johannes de Esseford dimidium feodum in Esseford.

Johannes de Melleleg' quartam partem feodi in Melleleg'.

Briain de Bromton' j. feodum in Bromton'.

Item Radulfus de Mortuomari j. feodum in Kinton' et Norton'.

Willelmus de Cantelupo j. feodum in Meeles.

Adam Mauveisin terciam partem feodi in Shiple.

Symon de Burle dimidium feodum in Burle.

Johannes de Donton' j. feodum in Donton'.

Johannes de Lingaine dimidium feodum in Lingaine.

Summa xviij. feoda et dimidium quarta et vja.

964 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.25.I.202-215 - cont.

Baronia W. de Laaey. In rotulo.

Walterus de Say iij. feoda in Nortatok', Sotstok', et Wethul.

Stephanus de Buterle et Petronilla de Kenleg' j. feodum in Rusbur'.

Willelmus de Forches j. feodum in Corfton'.

Thomas Maudut' j. feodum in Sotton' et Wichecot'.

Nicholaus de Hopton' j. feodum in Hopton'.

Stephanus de Buterle j. feodum in Buterle.

Philippus de Clinton' dimidium feodum in Hennele.

Robertus de Wodeton' dimidium feodum in Wodeton'.

Rogerus le Poer et participes sui dimidium feodum in Euledon'.

Johannes Piron quartam partem feodi in Pole.

Heredes Michaelis de Kirketot dimidium feodum in Heyton'.

Willelmus de Evereus dimidium feodum in altera Heyton'.

Baronia T. Corbet'. In rotulo.

Odo de Hodenet' j. feodum in Westbur'.

Robertus et Rogerus de Witton' j. feodum in Witton' cum pertinenciis.

Robertus Pigot j. feodum in Wilaston'.

Ricardus Corbet' j. feodum in Wetlesbore.

Fulco filius Warini j. feodum in Albebur'.

Rogerus de Merche dimidium feodum in Eyton'.

Willelmus de Horton' quartam partem feodi in Horton'.

Reginaldus de Hanewode dimidium feodum in Hanewode.

Adam de Arondel dimidium feodum in Habberleg'.

Radulfus de Ree decimam partem feodi in Ree.

Rogerus de Aston' j. feodum in Aston'.

Robertus de Hop' dimidium feodum in Hop'.

Willelmus et Gerin' Burnel j. feodum in Acton'.

Summa ix. feoda quarta et xa.

Isti tenent in capite de domino Rege. In rotulo.

Johannes de Pleisi j. feodum in Stottesdon'.

Egidius de Erdinton' j. feodum in Schayebur' et Welinton' [cancelled].

Adam de Brimnton' j. feodum in Longeford.

Henricus de Hastene quartam partem feodi in Eston' et Mosselawe.

Radulfus de Picford j. feodum in Aubricton' et Ruton' cum pertinenciis.

Johannes Extraneus j. feodum et dimidium in Chesewardin et Nesse.

Baronia de Wemme. In rotulo.

Radulfus Pincernator j. feodum in Hinestok et Wemme.

Walterus de Opton' j. feodum in Opton'.

Willelmus de Eyton' j. feodum in Eyton'.

Radulfus le Gras dimidium feodum in Colsisel.

Heredes Alani Panton' j. feodum in Dalileg', Tibricton'.

SALOP AND STAFFORD. 965

S.ij.25.I.202-215 - cont.

Baronia W. de Stotevill'. In rotulo.

Adam de Arondel dimidium feodum in Merebroc.

Walterus de Esse et participes sui j. feodum in Nene Baudwin'.

Ichenardus de Tileshop' terciam partem feodi in Tileshop'.

Galfridus de Grete j. feodum in Grete.

Rogerus de Foxcot' et participes sui dimidium feodum in Hintes.

Hugo Carbonel dimidium feodum in Esseford.

Johannes Stormi quartam partem feodi in Wetemor.

Robertus de Overton' quartam partem feodi in Overton'.

Willelmus de Mulston' dimidium feodum in Mulston'.

Henricus Hubaut' dimidium feodum in Hulle.

Henricus de Bodlers quartam partem feodi in Esseford.

Hugo de Hulle un decimam partem feodi in Hulle.

Summa v. feoda et dimidium et vja.

De Vallo Montis Gomery. In rotulo.

Walterus de Hokelton' dimidium feodum in Hokelton'.

Henricus de Wodforton' terciam partem feodi in Wodforton'.

Ricardus Porcel et participes sui dimidium feodum in Wonesbur' et Stanlawe.

David de Stocton' quartam partem feodi in Tonebur' et Stocton'.

Meurik de Hop' octavam partem feodi in Brocton' [1] et Russeton'.

Summa j. feodum et dimidium et va.

Feuda de Tornay. In rotulo.

Rogerus de Ichefeud dimidium feodum in Ichefeud.

Ricardus de Lopinton' j. feodum in Lopiton'.

Madoc' de Sotton' j. feodum in Stanewey et Staniacton' cum pertinenciis.

Hugo de Wlonkeslawe dimidium feodum in Wlonkeslawe.

Terra Walteri de Clifford. In rotulo.

Hugo de Cheenay terciam partem feodi in Norton'.

Willelmus Achilles decimam partem feodi in Dodelebur'.

Terra Thome Maudut. In rotulo.

Hugo de Opton' j. feodum in Medowele.

Robertus de la Boude j. feodum in La Boude.

Petrus de Dodemaneston' j. feodum in Dodemaneston'.

Hamo Pincernator j. feodum in Felton'.

Robertus de Bollardedon' tres partes feodi in Bollardedon'.

Willelmus de Castro Holegot' dimidium feodum in Castro Holegot'.

Robertus de Clifton' dimidium feodum in Bedlesworthe.

Feuda Peverel. In rotulo.

Willelmus de Hedleg' j. feodum in Ercalu.

Willelmus de Girne [2] quartam partem feodi in Tirne.


[1] Read Bromton'.
[2] Read Tirne.

966 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.25.I.202-215 - cont.

Feoda W. de Cantilupo. Breve.

Abbas de Hageman et Stephanus de Hop' j. feodum in Hop' et Wilderdeleg'.

Willelmus Honaud dimitfium feodum in Merton'.

Ricardus de Harle j. feodum in Harle.

Juliana de Staneworthin et participes sui j. feodum in Staneworthin.

Nicholaus de Opton' et participes sui dimidium feodum in Wittokeslawe.

Willelmus Wischart quintam partem feodi in Hatton'.

Robertus de Meysi quintam partem feodi in Stepelton'.

Rogerus de Eston' et participes sui decimam partem feodi in Eyton'.

Terra W. de Donestanvill'. In rotulo. [1] Breve.

Idem W. j. et dimidium in Ideshale.

Baronia Herberti filii Petri. In rotulo.

Walterus de Beumes j. feodum in Doninton'.

Terra Hugonis de Kilpec. In rotulo.

Idem Hugo j. feodum in Polrebeche cum pertinenciis.

Terra Aubrede de Botereus. In rotulo.

Rogerus Anglicus quintam partem feodi in Wlstaneston'.

Aubrey de Botereus j. feodum in Langesdon'.

[STAFFORD.]

Baronia de Stafford' de feodo de Mortoil. [2] In rotulo.

Willelmus de Auditheleg' tenet ij. feoda in Blore et Grendon'.

Heres comitis Lincolnie j. feodum in Caldon'.

Nigellus de Langeford j. feodum in Athelaxton'.

Radulfus Basset de Sapecot' j. feodum in Chedle.

Heres Gileberti de Bec ij. feoda in Hopton' et Tene.

Radulfus Basset j. feodum in Maddeleg'.

Willelmus de Staff' j. feodum in Bronsulf.

Radulfus de Dulverne j. feodum in Dulverne.

Heres Radulfi de Mutton' ij. feoda et dimidium in Mutton', Ingestret et Grotewis.

Willelmus le Wasteneis j. feodum in Couton'.

Hugo Bagot j. feodum in Bromle.

Paganus le Wasteneis j. feodum in Tikeshale.

Ivo de Saut' et participes sui j. feodum in Saut'.

Robertus de Mulewis et Galfridus de Nougent j. feodum in Mulewis.


[1] The note Breve is probably intended to supersede the note In rotulo. The Scutage Roll shows that Walter de Dunstanville had a writ.
[2] Read Morton'. While the tenants of this Barony claimed that the fees which they held of the lord were small fees, the Crown claimed that he held by the same number of normal fees, as of old. Memoranda Roll, L.T.R. no. 14, m. 9.

SALOP AND STAFFORD. 967

S.ij.25.I.202-215 - cont.

Robertus Marescallus et participes sui iij. feoda in Aston', Boreyelston'.

Ivo de Waleton' j. feodum in Waleton'.

Heres Willelmi de Doston' dimidium feodum in Ronton' et Weston'.

Robertus de Haleton' iij. feoda in Haleton' et Offeleg'.

Johannes de Peulton' dimidium feodum in Tillinton'.

Robertus de Suinnerton' j. feodum in Suinnerton'.

Iwein de Titnesovere j. feodum in Titnesovere.

Henricus de Verdon' et participes sui j. feodum in Levedehale.

Vivianus de Standon' ij. feoda in Standon' et Weston'.

Alexander de Mere et participes sui j. feodum in Mere.

Robertus de Stafford et Robertus de Mere j. feodum in Norton'.

Heres Johannis filii Philippi j. feodum in Berleston' et Bobiton'.

Robertus Bagot et participes sui dimidium feodum in Hildolveston'.

Robertus de Staff' dimidium feodum in Madeleg'.

Henricus de Auditheleg' dimidium feodum in Borewardeslyme.

Robertus Porcel j. feodum in Sarueshul.

Henricus de Auditheleg' j. feodum in Sardon'.

Radulfus de Covene j. feodum in Covene.

Ricardus de Stretton' j. feodum et quartam partem feodi in Stretton' et Doneston'.

Ad' de Beisin quartam partem feodi in Eton' quam tenet de R. de Stretton'.

Willelmus de Stafford dimidium feodum in Doneston' et Draiton'.

Hugo de Logis dimidium feodum in Otherton'.

Robertus de Copenhale j. feodum in Copenhale.

Johannes de Acton' duas partes feodi in Acton'.

Heredes Johannis Bagot ij. feoda in Blumenhul et Brinton'.

Herveius de Wilbricton' j. feodum in Wilbricton'.

Ad' de Brinton' j. feodum in Eyton' et Orselawe,

Ricardus de Hintes quintam partem feodi in Becterton'.

Hugo la Weyte dimidium feodum in Ricardescot.

Heres Rogeri Cissore dimidium feodum in Borton'.

Ad' de Beisin quintam partem feodi in Langenalre.

Robertus Mansel j. feodum in Patleshul.

Rogerus de Somervill' j. feodum et terciam partem feodi in Wichenovere et Sirescot'.

Willelmus de Ridewar' sextam partem feodi in Hamstal Ridewar'.

Egidius de Erdinton' et Herveius de Akele terciam partem feodi in Hade.

Johannes de Tamhorn quartam partem feodi in Media Ridewar'.

Summa l. feoda et iija et xv.

Feudum Walteri de Lasci. In rotulo.

Hugo de Kilpec j. feudum in Nortbur' de magnis feudis.

Baronia Rogeri de Somery. Breve.

Idem Rogerus j. feodum in Suineford et Clent et in Mere. De magnis feodis.

968 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.25.I.202-215 - cont.

Heres de Evenefeud i. feodum in Evenefeud.

Robertus de Bispesbur' j. feodum in Bispesbur cum pertinenciis.

Robertus de Wavere quintam partem feodi in Amelecot'.

Henricus de Morf' dimidium feodum in Morf'.

Willelmus Boffarre j. feodum in Penne.

Philippus de Lotteleg' quartam partem feodi in [1] Haggele.

Robertus de Esinton' terciam partem feodi in Mollesle.

Walterus de Overton' ij. feoda in Overton', Womborne, Suindon' et Oxele,

Thomas de Frankele j. feodum in Tresel et Seisdon'.

Petrus de Selle terciam partem et xl. partem feodi in Humelele.

Willelmus de Englefeud terciam partem feodi in Humelele.

Johannes de Paries quintam partem feodi in Honesworthe.

Willelmus de Pirie j. feodum in Pirie.

Hugo de Boeles dimidium feodum in Rushale.

Robertus de Witston' et Robertus de +Heinton'+ ij. partes feodi in +Einton'+.

Ricardus de Parva Barra j. feodum in Barra.

Baronia Episcopi Cestrensis. Respondet inter prelatos.

Ricardus de Harewecort' dimidium feodum in Elinhale de magnis feodis.

Heres Hugonis de Dokesay quintam partem feodi in Dokesay.

Heres Roberti de Sogenhul dimidium feodum in Sogenhul.

Symon de +Cherlecot'+ dimidium feodum in +Cherlecot'+.

Johannes de Chauernes quartam partem feodi in Chauernes.

Heres Willelmi de Offeleg' quartam partem feodi in Offele.

Ricardus de Flocesbroc quartam partem feodi in Flocesbroc.

Robertus de Halcton' quartam partem feodi in Tonstal.

Thomas de Peshale octavam partem feodi in Peshale.

Johannes de Parva Sogenhul octavam partem feodi in Sogenhul.

Robertus de Slindon' quartam partem feodi in Slindon'.

Petrus Giffard' quartam partem feodi in Waleton'.

Robertus de Badenhale decimam partem feodi in Badenhale.

Milisant' de Staff terciam partem feodi in Chaueledon'.

Episcopus j. feodum in Haywode.

Galfridus filius War' quartam partem feodi in Tibinton'.

Abbas de Hales quartam partem feodi in Horborn'.

Galfridus le Sauvag' dimidium feodum in Hintes.

David de Pakinton' quartam partem feodi in Pakinton'.

Johannes de Tamenhorn quartam partem feodi in Tamenhorn.

Idem Johannes octavam partem feodi in Acovere et Ridewar'.

Willelmus de Freford' dimidium feodum in Freford.

Willelmus Doddingeseles duas partes feodi in Weford'.

Ricardus de Pipa quartam partem feodi in Pipa.

Willelmus de Hondesacr' dimidium feodum in Hondesacr'.

Robertus Selvein j. feodum in Stodfald et Haselovre.

Rogerus de Fonte et Ricardus Puer quintam partem feodi in Withinton'.

Robertus de la Wal sextam partem feodi in La Wal.


[1] Read in Lotteleg' de H. de Haggele.

SALOP AND STAFFORD. 969

S.ij.25.I.202-215 - cont.

Robertus Poin sextam partem feodi in Stowe

Ricardus Puer quartam partem feodi in Elmehurt.

Rogerus de Lisewis sextam partem feodi in Langedon'.

Ricardus de Estmorebroc et Philippus filius Willelmi octavam partem feodi in Langedon'.

Rogerus de Fisareswik quintam partem in Fisareswik.

Petrus Giffard dimidium feodum in Engleton'. [1]

Johannes de Engleton' quartam partem feodi in Engleton'.

Ricardus de Thikebrom et Henricus de Lilleborne quartam partem feodi in Lilleborn'.

Johannes de Acton' quartam partem feodi in Bodenhale et Brocton'.

Robertus filius Ade et Walterus Torstani sextam partem feodi in Brocton'.

Lucianus de Stanton' terciam partem feodi in Stanton' et Athelaxton'.

Baronia J. filii Alani. In rotulo.

Hugo de Weston' j. feodum in Weston' et Neuton'.

Serle filius Alani terciam partem feodi in Cotes juxta Staff'.

Johannes Koyne j. feodum in Weston' sub Keveremont.

Willelmus Panton' dimidium feodum in Hales.

Michael et Jacobus de Morton' dimidium feodum in Morton'.

Willelmus de Gresele dimidium feodum in Kingeston'.

Henricus Mauveysin dimitfium feodum in Ridewar'.

Baronia Comitis Derebie. In rotulo.

Idem comes j. feodum in Wittokeshather.

Roesa de Verdon' j. feodum in Crakemers et Cracton' et viij. bovatas terre in Strongeshul.

Willelmus de Montegomery quartam partem feodi in Morton'.

Stephanus de Corcon quartam partem feodi in Falede.

Ricardus de Kamvill' j. feodum in Clifton'.

Ricardus de Vernon j. feodum in Herlaston'.

Rogerus de Somervill quartam partem feodi in Tonstal et Neubold.

Robertus de Meleborne xxxtam partem feodi in Harecros.

Willelmus de Candos xx. partem feodi in Merchinton'.

Walterus Camerarius xl. partem feodi in Merchinton'.

Robertus Selvein xxxix. partem feodi in Merchinton'.

Adam Kokus xl. partem feodi in Merchinton'.

Robertus Selvein xl. partem feodi in Iokeshale.

Reginaldus de Vatort et heredes Warini de Vernon j. feodum in Sogdon'. [2]

Comes de Ferrers ij. feoda in Certele cum pertinenciis.

Robertus de Hastene j. feodum in Chebesay.

Jacobus de Blithefeud dimidium feudum in Blithefeud. De feodo Warini de Montekainisio. Breve.


[1] Read Chilinton.
[2] Read Sondon.

970 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.25.I.202-215 - cont.

Baronia de Wemme. In rotulo.

Heredes Johannis Bagot j. feodum in Dodinton'.

Thomas de Cressewelle j. feodum in Cressewelle.

Radulfus Pincernator j. feodum in Almonton'.

Feuda que tenentur de Rege in capite. In rotulo.

Roesa de Verdon' j. feodum in Auueton' cum pertinenciis.

Rogerus de Somervill' quartam partem feodi in Alrewas cum pertinenciis.

Waukelinus de Arderna j. feodum in Elleford de rege de honore Cestrie.

Andreas Blondus j. feodum in Pencris.

Baronia Comitis Warewyk de feodo Henrici de Oilly. In rotulo.

Robertus de Grendon' sextam partem feodi in Senestan, de magnis feodis.

Willelmus de Herouwill' dimidium feodum in Wodnesbur'.

Honor Cestrie. In rotulo.

Roesa de Verdon' tenet Longesdon', Ruston', et alteram Longesdon', et medietatem de Ipstan per servicium inveniendi unum militem in warnestura castri Cestrie per xl. dies.

Nigellus de Langeford decimam partem feodi in Wytekeshul.

Feuda Comitis de Arondel. Breve.

Radulfus Basset dimidium feodum de honore Cestrie.

Idem Radulfus tenet j. feodum in Drayton' de honore Cestrie.

[Endorsed:-] In libro. Wygorn', Salop' et Staff'. Continet xvj. pecias.

Feoda militum de comitatibus Salop' et Stafford'.

SALOP.

S.ij.25(A). S.ij.25(B). I.215-225. S.ij.19(C). I.226-233.

Baronia J. filii Alani.

Herbertus Mauveisin dimidium feodum in Berewik'.

Thomas de Roshal' j. feodum et dimidium ibidem. [1]

Walterus Hose dimidium feodum in Atbricton'.

Willelmus Banastre cum participibus suis dimidium feodum in Hadenhal', Hauston', Swetton' [2] et Smethecot'.

Eynon filius Oweyn dimidium feodum in Franketon'.

Reynerus de Acton' dimidium feodum in Halekton' et Granelehull'.


[1] B. and C. read in Roshal'.
[2] Read Schotton'.
[3] Read Grineleshull', as in C.

SALOP AND STAFFORD. 971

S.ij.25(A). S.ij.25(B). I.215-225. S.ij.19(C). I.226-233 - cont.

Robertus de Espeleg' quartam partem feodi in Hopton'.

Henricus de Alditheleg' j. feodum in Marchumleg'.

Stephanus de Staunton' duo feoda in Staunton', Rodene et Preston'.

Johannes de Chedewind' ij. feoda in Chedewind'.

Thomas Corbet de Tasseleg' j. feodum in Hatton' et Hedleg'.

Rogerus de Appeleg' cum participibus suis dimidium feodum in Rodinton'.

Robertus de Halecton' fiijtam partem in Wythinton', Knitteleg', [1] Wytheford'. [2]

Thomas de Costentin j. feodum in Eton' et Aldebur'.

Ricardus de Lecton' j. feodum in Lecton'.

Petronilla de Kenleg' j. feodum in Kenleg', Bromcroft, Acton' Picot et Allecot'.

Adam de Muneton' dimidium feodum in Willreston'. [3]

Willelmus Hunald iiijtam in Fredesleg'.

Willelmus Marescot' dimidium feodum in Eton'.

Johannes Extraneus ij. feoda et dimidium in Mudle et Excalewe.

Walterus de Hugeford' iiij. feoda ibidem. [5] Willelmus de Auterive [6] dimidium feodum in Kenbricton'. Johannes de Ruton' dimidium feodum in Ruton'.

Johannes de Bukkebur' [7] viij. partem ibidem. [8]

Robertus de Dodinton' dimidium feodum in Dodinton'.

Philippus Boterel j. feodum in Eston'.

Simon de Frankeleg' dimidium feodum in Eudon'.

Willelmus de Cridelton' dimidium feodum ibidem. [9]

Willelmus de Upton' [10] dimidium feodum ibidem. [11]

Willelmus filius Aer j. feodum in Eaton'.

Ricardus [12] de Thongland' dimidium feodum ibidem. [13]

Robertus de Brocton' dimidium feodum ibidem. [14]

Thomas de Eathop' dimidium feodum ibidem. [15]

Baronia Thome Corbet.

Odo de Hodenet j. feodum in Westbur'.

Robertus de Witton' dimidium feodum in Witton'.

Robertus Picot j. feodum in Wylaveston'.

Ricardus Corbet j. feodum in Watelesbur'.

Fulco filius Warini j. feodum in Alberbur'.

Rogerus de Mers dimidium feodum in Eyton'.

Willelmus de Horton' dimidium feodum in Horton'.

Reginaldus de Hanewod' dimidium feodum in Hanewod'.

Willelmus Botereus dimidium feodum in Longeleg'. [16]

Adam de Arundel dimidium feodum in Hatburleg'.


[1] i.e. Knightley, co. Stafford.
[2] B. and C. read Parva Withiford' [3] B. and C. read Wilvreston'.
[4] Read Ercalewe.
[5] B. and C. read in Huggeford'.
[6] B. and C. read Hauterive.
[7] B. and C. read Rokkebur'.
[8] C. reads Bakkebur'.
[9] B. and C. read in Cridelton'.
[10] B. and C. read Hugo de Hupton' [11] B. and C. read in Hupton'.
[12] B. and C. read Willelmus.
[13] C. reads in Thongland.
[14] B. and C. read in Brocton'.
[15] B. and C. read in Esthop'.
[16] B. and C. read Langeleg'.

972 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.25(A). S.ij.25(B). I.215-225. S.ij.19(C). I.226-233 - cont.

Radulfus de Ree iiij. partem ibidem. [1]

Rogerus de Eston' j. feodum in Eston'.

Robertus de Hope dimidium feodum in Hope.

Baronia de Wemm'.

Radulfus le Butiler dimidium [2] feodum in Hynestok'.

Walterus de Upton' j. feodum in Upton'.

Willelmus de Eyton' j. feodum in Eyton'.

Baronia H. filii Petri.

Herebertus filius Petri dimidium feodum in Pantebur'.

Willelmus de Muleston' j. feodum in Dudesdon'.

Willelmus de Merinton' iiij. partem in Merinton'.

Albreda de Botereus dimidium feodum in Longedon'.

Baronia Radulfi de Mortuo Mari.

Radulfus de Mortuo Mari j. feodum in Cleybur'.

Radulfus de la Lawe j. feodum. [3]

Willelmus de Sancto Georgio j. feodum in Eudon' et [3]

Brian de Bromton' j. feodum in Kinlet.

Robertus de Wrodeton' et Rogerus de Burewardesleg' j. feodum in Huggel'.

Willelmus de la Ford', Thomas de Bardesleg' dimidium feodum in Kackesleg'.

Radulfus de Arras ij. feoda in Sutbur' et Nenton'.

Galfridus de Overton' j. feodum in Overton' et Comleg'.

Thomas de Costentyn iij. partem in Burewarston'.

Galfridus de Ledewyz j. feodum in Rugge.

Hugo de Sweynton' [4] ij. partes ibidem. [5]

Baronia W. de Lascy.

Walterus de Say iiij. feoda in Nortstok', Suthstok'.

Stephanus de Buterleg' et Petronilla de Kenleg' j. feodum in Rushur', [6] Wethull' et Chehey. [7]

Willelmus de Furch' j. feodum in Corfton'.

Thomas Maudut j. feodum in Sutton', Wychecot'.

Nicholaus de Hopton' j. feodum in Hopton'.

Stephanus de Buterleg' j. feodum in Buterleg',

Philippus de Clinton' dimidium feodum in Henneleg'.

Robertus de Wodeton' dimidium feodum in Wodeton'.

Rogerus le Poer et participes sui dimidium feodum in Euledon'.

Johannes Pyrun iiij. partem in La Pole.


[1] B. and C. read in Ree.
[2] B. and C. read j. feodum.
[3] The scribe seems to have been unable to read the original manuscript here. After Lawe j. feodum supply ibidem; and after Eudon' et supply Nene, where B. and C. read Nene Eudon.
[4] Read Scheynton', as in B. and C.
[5] B. and C. read in Sceynton.
[6] Read Rusbur' as in B. and C.
[7] B. and C. read Chelrey. But the passage is corrupt.

SALOP AND STAFFORD. 973

S.ij.25(A). S.ij.25(B). I.215-225. S.ij.19(C). I.226-233 - cont.

Heredes Michaelis de Kriketot' dimidium feodum in Heyton'.

Willelmus de Ebraicis dimidium feodum in Inferiorem [1] Heyton'.

Baronia Hugonis de Kylpec.

Idem Hugo j. feodum in Pulrebach'.

Odo de Hodenet, Johannes de Bekebur' et alii participes sui j. feodum in Pulrebach'.

Robertus de Clifton' dimidium feodum in Beleswrthin.

Willelmus Burnel, Gerin Burnel dimidium feodum in Acton'.

Rogerus Sprinchose et heredes Hugonis Extranei j. feodum in Biriton', Longelorn'. [2]

Rogerus Anglicus iiij. partem in Wistaneston'.

Odo de Hodenet dimidium feodum in Welbach'.

Baronia Thome Maudut de Castro Holegot.

Hugo de Upton' j. feodum in Medweleg'.

Robertus de la Bauide [3] j. feodum in La Baude.

Petrus de Dudemonsten' [4] j. feodum ibidem. [5]

Hamo le Butiler j. feodum [6] in Felton'.

Robertus de Buraston' [7] iij. partes ibidem. [8]

Willelmus de Castro Holegot dimidium feodum ibidem.

Baronia W. de Stutevill'.

Alanus de Harundel [9] dimidium feodum in Merebroc.

Walterus de la Esse cum participibus suis j. feodum in Nene.

Ichenardus de Chileshop' [10] iij. partem ibidem. [11]

Galfridus de Crete j. feodum in Crete.

Robertus Bagard' dimidium feodum in Hop'.

Rogerus de Foxecot' cum participibus suis cfimidium feodum ibidem. [12]

Baronia W. de Clifford'.

Hugo de Cheen' dimidium feodum in Norton'.

Willelmus Achill' iiij. partem in Dudelebur'.

Baronia de Vallo de Mongumery.

Walterus de Hukelton' dimidium feodum in Hukelton'.

Henricus de Wodeverton' iij. partem in Wodeverton'.

Ricardus Purcel cum participibus suis dimidium feodum in Wynesbur' et Stanlawe.

David de Stocton' iiij. partem in Thinebur', et Stocton'.

Meuricius de Hop' viij. partem in Brocton' [13] et Riston'.


[1] Read interiore.
[2] B. and C read Longenhoke.
[3] Read Baude as in B. and C.
[4] Read Dudemanston' as in B. and C.
[5] B. and C. read in Dudem'.
[6] B. reads j. feodum in feodo de Felton'; C. reads j. feodum in feodum in Felton.
[7] Read Bollardedon', i.e. Bouldon.
[8] B. and C. read in Buraston, but in error for Bollardedon.
[9] B. and C. read Arundel.
[10] Read Thileshop'. B. and C. read Thomas de Chileshop' in error.
[11] Sc. in Thileshop'. B. and C. read in Chileshop', in error.
[12] B. and C. read in Foxecot'.
[13] Read Bromton'.

974 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.25(A). S.ij.25(B). I.215-225. S.ij.19(C). I.226-233 - cont.

STAFFORD.

Baronia Roberti de Stafford'.

Willelmus de Alditheleg' cum participibus suis ij. feoda in Blore, Grendon' et Athelaxton'.

Henricus de Auditheleg' ij. partes in Burewardesleg' Lime, [1] Riston', et Ulton'.

Comes Lincolnie, Robertus de Stafford', R. Basset, Robertus de Mere, ij. feoda in Norton', Caldon', Madeleg' Alfachk'.

Gilbertus de Becco ij. feoda in Hopton', Thene, Sauth.

Abbrech' [2] de Crokeaden' terciam partem in Ak'.

Rogerus de Sumervill', Hugo Bagoth ij. feoda in Wychenovere Bromleg'.

Willelmus de Wasteneys, Radulfus de Mutton', ij feoda in Higestront, [3] Gretewyz, Abbeton' et Golton'. [4]

Prior de Stanes, Robertus Marescallus, ij. feoda in Eston', Bureweston', Stanes.

Paganus de Wasteneys duas partes in Tykeshal'.

Ricardus de Stretton' ij. feoda in Streton', Eyton', Mulewyz.

Robertus de Suinnieverton', [5] Ivo de Cistenovere, [6] Ivo de Waleton' ij. feoda in Swineverton', [7] Titnesovere, Waleton'.

Vivianus de Staundon' ij. feoda in Staundon', Weston', Sardon'.

Heredes Willelmi de Doston' iiij. partem in Ronton'.

Robertus de Halketon' ij. feoda et ij. partes in Haleketon', Offileg', Weston' et Mere.

Robertus de Coppenhall', Robertus Purcel, ij. feoda in Coppenhall', Covene, Sarueshull'.

Hugo de Loges iiij. partem in Otherton'.

Heredes Johannis filii Philippi, Radulfus de la Mare, ij. feoda in Berleston', Bobinton', Hildelveston'.

Adam de Brinton', Henricus de Verdun, Robertus Bagot, ij. feoda in Eyton', Levedenhal', [8] Pateshull'.

Egidius de Erdinton' iiij. partem in Ode.

Baronia J. filii Alani in hoc comitatu.

Willelmus Paunton' dimidium feodum in Hales.

Hugo de Weston' j. feodum in Weston'.

Henricus Mauveysin dimidium feodum in Ridewar'.

Willelmus de Greseleg' dimidium feodum in Kingeston'.

Michael de Morton' et Jacobus de Morton' dimidium feodum ibidem. [9]

Coten' Mauveysin. Dimidium feodum in Coten.

Johannes Coyne cum participibus suis j. feodum in Weston', Cavereswall', Focebroc.

Henricus Mauveysin dimidium feodum in Ridewar' Mauveysin.


[1] Read Burewardeslime.
[2] Read Abbatia.
[3] B. and C. read Ingestront.
[4] Read Colton' as in B. and C.
[5] Read Suuineverton'.
[6] Read Tistenovere.
[7] Read Swinnerton', as in B. and C.
[8] B. and C. read Levedeshale, [9] B. and C. read in Morton.

SALOP AND STAFFORD. 975

S.ij.25(A). S.ij.25(B). I.215-225. S.ij.19(C). I.226-233 - cont.

Baronia de Wemme in hoc comitatu.

Radulfus le Butiler j. feodum in Alcminton'.

Willelmus de Eyton' j. feodum in Kersewall'.

Domina de Bluminhull' cum participibus suis j. feodum in Dudinton'.

Baronia Comitis de Ferariis.

Idem comes ij. feoda in Cartesleg'. [1]

Episcopus Cestrensis j. feodum in Heywod'.

Comes de Ferariis j. feodum in Saundon'.

Robertus de Hastinges j. feodum in Chebesey.

Rogerus de Sumervill' iiij. partem in Wychenovere.

Ricardus de Vemum iiij. in Herlaveston'.

Ricardus de Kaunvill' j. feodum in Clifton'.

Baronia Episcopi Cestrensis.

Ricardus de Harecurt dimidium feodum in Helinhall'. [2]

Robertus de Suggenhull' dimidium feodum in Suggenhull'.

Simon de Cherleton' cum participibus suis dimidium feodum in Cherleton'.

Ricardus de Slokebroc [3] iiij. in Flocebroc.

Thomas de Peshall' viij. in Peshall'.

Johannes de Chauemes iiijtam ibidem.

Episcopus Cestrensis iiijtam Offileg' Ciprian.

Robertus de Slindon' viij. in Slindon'.

Petrus Giffard viij. in Ualeton'. [4]

Hugo de Dokesey quintam ibidem.

Milesant' [5] de Stafford iij. in Chaueledon'.

Robertus de Badenhall' xam in Badenhall'.

Robertus de Haleton' iiij. in Tunstall'.

Johannes de Sugenhull' viij. ibidem. [6]

Galfridus le Sauvage cum participibus suis j. feodum in Pakinton', +Chibritton+, Hintes.

Robertus de la Wall' xviijam partem ibidem. [7]

Ricardus de Pipe iiij. in Pipe.

Robertus Sylveyn j. feodum in Haselovere, Stofford'. [8]

Ricardus de Draicot' dimidium in Hondesacr'.

Johannes de Chamenburn [9] dimidium feodum ibidem. [10]


[1] B. reads Carteleg'; C. reads Charteleg'.
[2] C. reads Elinhall'.
[3] Read Flocebroc. B. and C. read Flotesbroc.
[4] B. and C. read Waleton.
[5] B. and C. read Milisaund'.
[6] B. and C. read in Sugenhull'.
[7] B. and C. read in La Walle.
[8] B. and C. read Stodford'.
[9] Read Thamenhurn.
[10] B. reads in Chamenborn' wrongly.

976 A.D. 1242-1243.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY.

S.ij.26.I.60-62.

ROTULUS DE FEODIS ... M' NOTINGH' ET DERB'

Robertus de Stretlegh tenet feodum j. militis in Stretleg' in capite de domino rege-xl.s.

De abbate de la Dale x.s. pro quarta parte feodi j. militis de feodo Radulfi de Mortuo Mari qui tenet de domino rege.

De Petro filio Osberti viij.s. pro quinta parte feodi j. militis in Stanton'.

De Ricardo de Wiverton' viij.s, pro quinta parte feodi j. militis.

[De Willelmo Samson' xl.s. pro feodo j. militis in Eperston' et Wudeburg.] (Cancelled:-) Habet breve de habendo scutagio.

De Roberto le Vavasur xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Bilburgh'.

De Radulfo de Fresseuuill' [1] ciiij.s. scilicet pro duobus feodis militum in Boney et dimidio feodo militis in Barton' et Kewurth et decima parte feodi j. militis in Brademar.

De Reginaldo de Anesl' xl.s. pro feodo j. militis de feodo ipsius Radulfi de Fresseuuill'.

De Johanne de Orreby xl.s. pro feodo j. militis de feodo ipsius Radulfi.

De Roberto Dethec x.s. pro feodo quarto partis unius militis de eodem feodo.

De abbate de Derleg' iiij.l. pro duobus feodis militum de feodo eiusdem Radulfi.

De Radulfo de Fresseuuill' iiij.l. pro duobus feodis militum in Scardeclive.

xvij.l. xiiij.s.

De Rogero de Sumervill' xl.s. pro feodo j. militis de eodem feodo.

De Roberto de Kokefeld' x.s. pro quarta parte feodi j. militis de custode de Alfirton'.

De Hugone filio Radulfi xl.s. pro feodo j. militis in Gresel' quam tenet in capite de domino rege.

De Johanne de Bello Campo xl.s. pro feodo j. militis in Beston' quam tenet de domino rege.

De Rogero de Watenhow xx.s. pro dimidio feodo j. militis quod tenet de custode de Alfirton'.

De Henrico de Birchwud dimidia marca pro sexta parte feodi j. militis quod tenet de eodem custode.

De Willelmo de Wudeburgh' xx.s. pro dimidio feodo j. militis quod tenet de eodem custode.

De Ranulfo le Poer xl.s. pro dimidio [2] feodo j. militis quod tenet de eodem custode.

De eodem Ranulfo x.s. pro quarta parte feodi j. militis quod tenet de eodem custode.

De Galfrido de Stapilford xl.s. pro feodo j. militis de honore Peverel.

De Cecilia de Menil xl.s. pro fecdo j. militis de eodem honore.

De villata de Glapwell' xl.s. pro feodo j. militis de eodem honore.


[1] The sum below includes only the Fressevill fees.
[2] So in MS.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 977

S.ij.26.I.60-62 - cont.

De Rogero le Breton' xxx.s. pro tribus partibus feodi j. mllitis de eodem honore.

De Johanne de Orreby xxx.s. pro tribus partibus feodi j. militis.

De Willelmo de Riseleg' xx.s. pro dimidio feodo j. militis de feodo Radulfi de Mortuo Mari.

De Willelmo de Trowell' j.m. pro tercia parte feodi j. militis de eodem feodo.

De Radulfo de Normanvill' xij.s. v.d. pro quarta parte et septima decima parte feodi j. militis quas tenet in capite de rege.

De Willelmo de Morteyn xl.s. pro feodo j. militis quod tenet in capite de domino rege.

De Roberto le Sauvage c.s. pro ij. feodis et dimidio de feodo Rogeri de Munbray in Egrum.

De Johanne Torkard iiij.l. pro ij. feodis militum de feodo Hugonis Wak.

De hominibus de Kileburn xx.s. pro dimidio feodo j. militis de eodem feodo.

De Roberto de Cozhall' x.s. pro quarta parte feodi j. militis de feodo Reginaldi de Anesi'.

De Johanne de Grey xl.s. pro feodo j. militis de feodo de Coddenhovere.

De Isolda de Grey c. et x.s. pro duobus feodis et tribus partibus feodi j. militis de eodem feodo.

De Mattheo de Havereshech iiij.l. pro duobus feodis j , militis de feodo Johannis de Stutevill'.

De Galfrido Barre xxxiij.s. iiij.d. pro quinque partibus feodi j. militis de eodem feodo.

De Johanne de Stutevill' xiiij.l. pro septem feodis militum que tenet de domino rege in capite.

De Roberto Daft x.s. piro quarta parte feodi j. militis de feodo Roberti de Pavilly.

De Galfrido de Bakepuz xxx.s. pro tribus partibus feodi j. militis de eodem feodo.

De Galfrido de Wildebuf dimidia marca pro sexta parte feodi j. militis de feodo Galfridi Barre.

De Willelmo Rosel xl.s. pro feodo j. militis de feodo Willelmi de Percy.

De Roberto de Lathum xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis de feodo comitis Leycestrie.

[De villata de Thorp Bossard j.m. pro tercia parte feodi j. militis de feodo Hugonis de Albiniaco.] (Cancelled:-) Quia habet breve.

Summa iiijixixl. xij.s. v.d.

Hec summa vera est et soluta unde vicecomes protulit talliam coram baronibus a die Sancti Michaelis in xv. dies anno xxvjto.

Archiepiscopus Eboracensis habet scutagium suum per preceptum domini regis per breve.

Episcopus Lincolniensis habet scutagium suum per breve.

Comitissa de Augo habet scutagium per breve.

978 A.D. 1242-1243.

S.ij.26.I.60-62 - cont.

Robertus de Everhingham habet scutagium per breve.

Nicholaus de Moles habet scutagium per breve.

Oliverus de Eyncurt habet scutagium per breve.

Galfridus Dispens' habet scutagium suum per breve.

Gilbertus de Gaunt habet scutagium suum per breve.

Willelmus de Albiniaco habet scutagium per breve.

Petrus de Sabaudia habet scutagium per breve.

Willelmus Bardoll habet scutagium per breve.

Gerardus de Oddiggecheles habet scutagium per breve.

Hugo de Albiniaco habet breve de scutagio.

Andreas Luterel habet scutagium per breve.

Walterus Mareschallus habet scutagium per breve.

Petrus de Chawurces habet scutagium per breve.

Isti vero qui habent breve de habendo scutagio non permittunt quod inquisicio fiat de feodis militum que teneantur de ipsis.

Comes de Ferrariis fecit securitatem faciendi pacem de scutagio; et ballivi sui non permittunt quod vicecomes intret infra libertatem suam ad inquirendum quot feoda militum teneantur de ipso.

In libro. In comitatu Notingh'.

S.ij.26.I.55-57.

Robertus de Stretleg unum feodum militis ibidem.

(Forty-one similar entries, the names being identical with those in the document printed immediately above.)

I.25-36.

Alicia comitissa de Augo tenet in comitatu Notingh' * feoda militum et * de quibus

Rogerus de Osberton' tenet totam villam de Stretton' per feodum unius militis de predicta comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Willelmus Ruffus et Mauveisinus de Hersy tenent totam villam de Grave per feodum militis et dimidium de predicta comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Simon de Hedon' tenet totam villam de Hedon' per feodum unius militis et quartam partem feodi unius militis de dicta comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Wulrington' tenet totam villam de Eton' per duo feoda militum de dicta comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Willelmus de Bevercotes tenet totam villam de Bevercotes per feodum unius militis de eadem comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Thomas filius Willelmi et Albreda de Bassingburn' tenent totam villam de Harewurth' per feodum unius mllitis de comite Lincolnie, et comes de comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 979

I.25-36 - cont.

Item Ingeram filius Galfridi, Thomas de Stretton' et Isabella uxor eius, unde hereditas movet, Normannus filius Alfredi tenet [1] feodum unius militis in Stirop de eadem comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Willelmus filius Rogeri, heres Rogeri de Cressy, qui est in custodia comitisse Augii, tenet totam villam de Hodishac cum socka per feodum urtius militis de eadem comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Johannes de Orreby et Thurstanus Dispens' tenent in Byleby terciam partem et xij. partem feodi unius militis de eadem comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Furnell' et Thomas de Linc' tenent duas partes feodi unius militis in Karleton' de eadem comitissa, et ipsa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Stephanus Maluel tenet in Rampton' feodum unius militis de eadem comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Matillis de Luvetot tenet in Wirkesop feodum unius militis de eadem comitissa, et ipsa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item eadem Matillis tenet feodum unius militis in Gringeleg', Mistirton', Walkeringham, Herewell' de eadem comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antique feoffamento.

Item Willelmus de Sandeby tenet feodum unius militis in Sandeby, Markam, Burton', Babwurd, Mistirton', Warsop et in Wellum de dicta comitissa, et ipsa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Alicia filia Matillidis de Luvetoth tenet quartam partem feodi unius militis in Thorp de Matillide de Luvetot, et Matillis de eadem comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Hugo de Capella et filia Roberti de Sumervill' tenent in villa de Oxton' feodum unius militis de Matillide de Luvetot, et Matillis de dicta comitissa, [2] de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Willelmus de Furnell' tenet quartam partem feodi unius militis in Normanton', Grestorp' de eadem Matillide, et Matillis de comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item prior de Schellord' tenet feodum unius militis in Saxendall' de dicta Matillide, et Matillis de comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Fulco de Hotot tenet dimidium feodum militis in Flint ham de eadem Matillide, et Matillis de comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Thomas de Chaurcis tenet in villa de Marnham cum pertinenciis duo feoda militum de comitissa, et ipsa de rege.

Item Willelmus Ruffus et Mauveisinus de Hersy tenent dimidium feodum militis in Weston' de dicta comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Aivill' et Johannes de Nunvulers [3] tenet [1] feodum unius militis in Skegheby de Thoma filio Willelmi, et Thomas de comitissa, et comitissa de rege de novo feoffamento. Quia ceperunt illud cum maritagio duarum sororum dicti Thome.


[1] Read tenent.
[2] Supply et comitissa.
[3] Read Lunvulers.

980 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.25-36 - cont.

Item Ricardus de Normanvill' et Henricus de Walleg' tenent dimidium feodum militis de comitissa ut in Karleton', Stoke, Gedling', cum una bovata terre in Weston' de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Thurstan Dispens' tenet in Eperiston' iiijtam partem feodi unius militis de comitissa, et ipsa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Walterus de Thuck' tenet in Kelum dimidium feodum militis de dicta comitissa, et ipsa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Agatha de Thuck' tenet in eadem villa dimidium feodum militis pro custodia Johannis heredis Petri de Keluni de feodo Rogeri de Cressi, et Rogerus de comitissa, et comitissa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Hugo Pincerna tenet feodum unius militis in Hokirton' de comitissa, et ipsa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Thomas filius Willelmi tenet dimidium feodum militis in Plumtr', Normanton', Stanton', Kewurth', Rutinton', Riseleg' et Clipeston' de comitissa, et ipsa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Nigellus de Mundevill', Willelmus de Stafford' et Rogerus de Lovetot tenent feodum unius militis in Wisow de comitissa, et ipsa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Willelmus de Bou' tenet feodum unius militis in Corthngstok' et Rempiston' de comitissa predicto modo.

Item Petrus de Stanford' tenet feodum unius militis in Stanford' auper Sore de comitissa, et ipsa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Gervasius de Uuetorp' tenet tres partes feodi unius militis in Uuetorp' de eodem feodo de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus et Willelmus Barry tenent in Torloueton' feodum unius militis de eodem feodo et de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus Malebyche et abbas de Wellebeck' tenent tres partes feodi unius militis in Knyveton' de eodem feodo et de veteri feoffamento.

Item Galfridus le Fremund et participes eius tenent dimidium feodum militis in Flintham de eodem feodo et de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus filius Willelmi de Coliston' tenet dimidium feodum militis in Coliston de eodem feodo et de veteri feoffamento.

Item Hugo filius Radulfi et Willelmus de Batheleg' tene[n]t in Bathel' et Sudmuscham terciam partem feodi unius militis de comite Lincolnie, et comes de eodem honore de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Willelmus filius Roberti de Riseleg' tenet in Riseleg' quoddam tenementum unde reddit xviij.d. quando scutagium est ad iij. marcas de honore de Tykehill'.

Item Ricardus Putrel tenet in Thurmeston' feodum unius militis de eodem feodo de veteri feoffamento.

Oliverus de Ayncurd tenet in comitatu Notingh' * feoda militum, de quibus.

Willelmus de Aslacton' et abbas de Wellebeck' tenent in Aslacton' unum feodum militis et dimidium de feodo Oliveri de Ayncurd, et Oliverus de rege de novo feoffamento.

Item Oliverus de Ayncurd tenet unum feodum militis in Sutton et Graneby de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 981

I.25-36 - cont.

Item Gerardus de Fanecurt tenet unum feodum militis in Hieling' et Kinigton' [1] de eodem feodo et de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Ayncurd tenet feodum militis in Radeclive de eodem feodo de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Gilbertus tenet dimidium feodum j. militis in Kyrcoluiston' de eodem feodo de veteri feoffamento.

Item Rogerus de Ayncurd tenet quartam partem feodi unius militis in Knapetorp de eodem feodo de veteri feoffamento.

Item Walterus de Gousil tenet feodum unius militis in Plintham de eodem feodo de veteri feoffamento.

Item Ricardus de Jorz tenet in Birton' feodum unius militis de heredibus Ade de Sancta Mar', et ipsi de Olivero de Ayncurt de veteri feoffamento.

Item heredes Ade de Sancta Mar', scillcet Reginaldus de Anesl', Sibilla de Sancta Mar', Adam de Ridewar', tenent feodum unius militis in Bulcote de eodem feodo de veteri feoffamento.

Item Walterus de Gousil et Robertus de Ayncurt tenent duo feoda militum in Hoveringham de eodem feodo et de veteri feoffamento.

Item Benedictus filius Thome tenet unum feodum militis ut in Roufiston' et Kelum de eodem feodo et de veteri feoffamento.

Item Thomas de Bella Aqua et Rogerus de Crich tenet [2] in Hokerinton' dimidium feodum militis de veteri feoffamento.

Item Oliverus de Aincurt tenet in Elmeton' et Holmesfeld' cum pertinenciis feoda duorum militum de domino rege in capite de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Radulfus Basset tenet in Languat feodum miius militis de eodem Olivero, et Oliverus de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Rogerus de Ayncurd tenet in Morton' feodum j. militis de eodem et de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus de Heriz tenet in Wilhametorp' dimidium feodum militis, scilicet de custodia Galfridi le Despenser de Stavel' et herede Roberti Musard, de eodem de antiquo feoffamento.

De feodo Andree Luterel nichil inventum est de domino rege in capite nisi de feodo Gerardi de Rodes.

De Honore de Lancastr' tenentur in comitatu Not' *de quibus.

Willelmus de Grendon' tenet in Babwurd dimidium feodum unius militis de honore de Lancastr' de veteri feoffamento.

Item Thomas de Marsey, qui est in custodia domini W. archiepiscopi, tenet in Gameleston' unum feodum militis et dimidium de eodem honore et de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Furnel' et Robertus de Sancto Georgio tenent in Bodmeshill' feodum unius militis de eodem honore de veteri feoffamento.

Item abbas de Swinesheveth tenet in Cotegrave feodum unius militis de eodem honore de veteri feoffamento.


[1] Read Kinalton.
[2] Read tenent.

982 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.25-36 - cont.

Item Michael de Maunuers tenet in Alwalton', [1] Holm, Gameliston' Lambecote et Buketon' feodum unius militis de eodem honore de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Nicholaus de Wycheford' tenet in Flintham feodum unius militis de herede Rogeri de Marsey, qui est in custodia archiepiscopi, de eodem honore de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Johannes de Vilers tenet in Kalverton' feodum unius militis de eodem honore de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Comes Lincolnie tenet in comitatu Not' * feoda militum, de quibus.

Johannes de Gatton' tenet in Cfippiston' feodum unius militis de Thoma, et Thomas de comite Lincolnie de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Hugo de Weston' tenet in Weston' feodum dimidii militis de eodem comite de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Thomas filius Willelmi tenet in Breydiston' dimidium feodum unius militis de eodem comite, et comes de comitissa Augii, et ipsa de rege.

Item Knesale quam Marescallus tenet (unfinished).

Robertus de Everingham tenet in comitatu Not' * feoda militum, de quibus.

Reginaldus Ursel et Hugo de Tytheby tenent dimidium feodum in Getling, Carleton', Stoke de feodo Roberti de Everingh', et Robertus de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Everingham tenet in Lexinton' feodum unius militis et dimidium de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item idem Robertus de Everingham tenet in Schelford' feodum j. militis de rege in capite.

Item Thomas de Muscham tenet in Kalnaton' et Nordmuscham feodum unius militis de eodem feodo.

Willelmus Bardolf tenet in comitatibus Not' et Derb' * feoda militum, de quibus.

Hugo de la Basage tenet in Carleton', Gedling' et Stoke dimidium feodum militis de Willelmo Bardolf'.

Item Willelmus Bardolf' tenet in Schelford' feodum unius militis de rege in capite de antiquo feoffamento.

Idem tenet in Eggenton', Aywaldeston', Thurcliston', Aywaldeston' et Okebroc quatuor feoda et dimidium de rege in capite de antiquo feoffamento.

Comes Leycestrie tenet in comitatu Notingh' * feoda militum, de quibus.

Robertus de Lathum tenet in Edwalton' dimidium feodum militis de eodem comite de antiquo feoffamento. Et omnes alie terre quas habet tenentur ab eo per liberam firmam.


[1] Read Atbolton.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 983

I.25-36 - cont.

Gilbertus de Gand' tenet in comitatibus Not' et Derb' * feoda militum, de quibus.

Willelmus de Sutton' tenet in Aykering xxam partem unius feodi de feodo Gilberti de Gand de veteri feoffamento.

Item Adam de Neumarche tenet duo feoda militum in Watton' et Aslacton' de eodem de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Radulfus filius Petri et tres participes eius tenent in Hokiswurtd feodum unius militis de Jollano de Nevill', et ipse de Gilberto de Gand de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Hugo filius Radulfi tenet duas partes feodi unius militis in Ilkisdon' de eodem feodo, et ipse de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Robertus le Vavasur et Nicholaus filius Johannis de Henouere tenet [1] in Schippeleg' duas partes feodi unius militis de Hugone filio Radulfi, et ipse Hugo de Gilberto de Gand, et Gilbertus de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Radulfus de Hereford et Robertus de Muschamp tenent in Stanton' dimidium feodum unius militis de H. filio Radulfi, et H. de Gilberto, et ipse de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Henricus de Buketon' tenet in Breydeston' dimidium feodum unius militis de Hugone filio Radulfi, et Hugo de Gilberto de Gand, et ipse de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

W. archiepiscopus Eboracensis tenet in comitatu Notingh' * feoda militum, de quibus.

Hugo filius Radulfi tenet in Muschamp et Carleton' feodum unius militis de feodo archiepiscopi de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Everingham tenet in Nordkarleton' feodum unius militis de eodem feodo de veteri feoffamento.

Comes de Arundel tenet in comitatibus* *feoda militum, de quibus.

Alvredus de Sulleny tenet in Brocton' Sulleny feodum unius militis de eodem comite de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Johannes Bossard tenet in Thorp' Bassard et in Willegby quartam partem unius feodi et xxxam partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo de antiquo feoffamento.

Derb'. Item Robertus de Scheping tenet dimidium feodum militis in Smitheby de eodem feodo.

Derb'. Item Gilbertus de Segrave tenet iiij. partem unius feodi in Breteby de eodem feodo.

Derb'. Item Gyles de Berclay tenet dimidium feodum in Childecote de eodem feodo.

R. episcopus Lincolniensis tenet in comitatu* *feoda militum, de quibus.

Nigellus de Lisur' tenet in Fletburg' et Normanton', Stokum et Stemetorp' duo feoda militum de feodo dicti episcopi de antiquo feoffamento.


[1] Read tenent.

984 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.25-36 - cont.

Item Radulfus de Crumbwell' tenet in Crumbwell' feodum dimidii militis de honore eiusdem episcopi de antiquo feoffamento.

Item idem Radulfus tenet in Westhalum octavam partem feodi unius militis de eodem honore.

Item Willelmus de Bellehew tenet in Aldiswurd x8n> partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Patricius de Chaurcis tenet in comitatu Not' * feoda militum, de quibus.

Philippus de Cortlingstok' tenet duo feoda militum ut in Cortlingstok', Rempiston' de feodo eiusdem Patricii de antiquo feoffamento.

Willelmus de Albania tenet in comitatu Not' * feoda militum, videlicet:-

Idem Willelmus tenuit Oskinton' cum soka de domino rege in capite pro duobus feodis militum. Et idem Willelmus feoffavit [1] Rogerum Bozun de dimidio feodo in villa, et Willelmum de Audelleg' de quarta parte feodi unius militis.

Nicholaus de Moles tenet in comitatu Notingh' tria feoda militum et dimidium ut in Widmerpol, Gunolviston', Wynefeld' et Tybchelf', scilicet per custodiam terre et heredis Johannis de Heriz de dono Henrici Regis filii Johannis.

De Episcopatu Cestrensi.

Item Sallow cum soca est in rrianu domini regis, unde Patricius de Saucheverel [2] tenet quartam partem unius feodi militis in Oppewell' de Nigello de Langeford', et Nigellus de episcopo Cestrensi.

Item Hugo filius Radulfi tenet sextam partem feodi unius militis in Wyvellstorp' de eodem honore.

Item Ricardus de Kynestan tenet xvj. partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Item Robertus Ingeram reddit pro terra quam habet in Eyton' ij.s., sive scutagium sit ad plus sive ad minus, de eodem feodo.

Item Hugo Teverey tenet xvj. partem feodi unius militis in eadem villa de eodem feodo.

Item Willelmus filius Rogeri et Elyas tenent in eadem villa xvj. partem feodi unius militis de eodem feodo.

Et preterea Nigellus de Lageford' tenet in Oppewell' feodum unius militis de eodem honore de antiquo feoffamento.

Galfridus le Despenser tenet feodum unius militis ut in Staveleg, Barleg' et Hinkershil' cum pertinenciis pro custodia terre et heredis Roberti Musard, scilicet per dominum regem. Item habet in Tiscinton'.

Albreda de Bassingburn' tenet in Brigeford unum feodum militis pro custodia terre et heredis J. Bisset per dominum regem.

Item eadem Albreda tenet in Harewude feodum dimidii militis de (unfiniahed).


[1] Feoffavit repeated in error.
[2] Read Chaurcels.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 985

I.25-36 - cont.

Episcopus Karleolensia tenet dimidium feodum militis in Pevereltorp' pro custodia Roberti filii et heredis Johannis de Veteri Ponte de domino rege in capite.

Item idem tenet in Chelardeston' quartam partem unius feodi militis pro custodia heredis Philippi Marck'.

Memorandum quod Radulfus de Sancto Edmundo [1] tulit breve de scutagio suo habendo et non habet nisi tres carucatas terre in Catton', quas tenet de comite de Ferrariis pro dimidio feodo, ut per inquisicionem wapentachii de Greseleg' didiscimus.

Item de feodo Thome de Grenleg' nichil invenitur et tamen portavit breve regis ad habendum scutagium suum.

Item Johanna Wake que fuit uxor Hugonis Wacke habet custodiam Hugonis Wacke, scilicet Cestrefeld' cum pertinenciis et cum wapentachio, exceptis xvj. libratis terre quas Willelmus de Percy tenet nomine unius heredum Willelmi de Bruer, et unde Johanna Wacke cum aliis heredibus Willelmi de Bruer tam de manerio de Cestrefeld' quam de aliis terris in pluribus comitatibus tenent per servicium trium feodorum militum, ut in Cestrefeld', Snenton', Axminister et Kynkiswere et [2] Sumersete. Et hoc est de feoffamento Regis Johannis.

Johannes Torkard' tenet tres partes ville de Hokenhall' pro feodo unius militis et tercia parte feodi de eodem honore.

Willelmus Samps' tenet Eperiston' et Wudeburg' de baronia de Odighes' per feodum unius militis de antiquo feoffamento.

Sumonitores ad sumoniendum W. comitem Derb' et Clemenciam comitissam Cestrie, Thomas Bussun de Kettliston', Petrus filius Willelmi de Thurliston', Willelmus filius Henrici de Breydiston', Nicholaus filius Thome de Henovere, quod sint coram baronibus de Scaccario ad ostendendum quare non certificaverunt vicecomitem de quot feodis feoffatus est de domino rege nec quot feoda tenentur de ipso tam de novo feoffamento quam de veteri. Et comitissa Cestrie sumonita est pro eodem.

Sumonitores Roberti episcopi Lincolniensis, Johannes Pride de Kelum, Radulfus filius Helwis' de eadem.

Sumonitores ad sumoniendum omnes libertates wapentachiorum de Bers' et Oswardebec, Simon de Jorz de Ordishall' et Willelmus le Taylur de Leyrton'.

I.6-24.(I.41-49.)

FEODA MILITUM QUE TENENTUR IN COMITATIBUS NOT' ET DERB' QUI HABENT BREVIA DE HABENDO SCUTAGIO.

Alicia [3] comitissa de Augo tenet in comitatu Not' xxxix. feoda militum et terciam partem feodi militis et quinquagesimam partem j. feodi, de quibus

Rogerus de Osberton' tenet totam villam de Stretton' per feodum j. militis de predicta comitissa, et comitissa de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus Ruffus et Mauveisinus de Heroy tenent de ea totam villam de Grave per feodum unius militis et dimidii, et illa de rege de veteri feoffamento. Nota.


[1] Read Amando.
[2] Reud in.
[3] On margin loquendum.

986 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.6-24.(I.41-49.) - cont.

Item Simon de Hedon' tenet de ea totam villam de Hedon' per feodum unius militis et iiijtam partem unius feodi, et illa de rege de veteri feoffamento. Nota.

Item Robertus de Wlrington' [1] et Johannes de Eton' tenent de ea totam villam de Eton' per duo feoda unius militis, et illa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus de Peverilcotes [2] tenet de ea totam villam de Peverelcotes [2] cum pertinenciis per servicium feodi unius militis, et illa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Thomas filius Willelmi et Albreda de Bassingburn' tenent de ea totam villam de Hareworth' per feodum j. militis, et illa de rege etc.

Item Ingeram filius Galfridi, Thomas de Stretton' et Isabella uxor eius, a qua hereditas movet, et Normannus filius Alfredi tenent de ea in Styrop feodum unius militis, et illa de rege etc.

Item Willelmus filius et heres Rogeri de Cressy, qui est in warda dicte comitisse, tenet de ea totam villam de Hoddeshac cum soca per feodum unius militis, et ipsa etc.

Item Johannes [3] de Orreby et Thurstan Dispens' tenent de ea terciam partem et xij. partem feodi unius militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Fornellis et Thomas de Lincolnia tenent de ea in Carleton' feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Stepphanus Mauluvel tenet de ea in Rampton' feodum unius militis, et illa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Matildis de Lyvetot tenet de ea in Wyrkeshop' feodum unius militis, et illa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item eadem Matillis tenet de ea in Gringgeleg', Misterton', Walkeringh', Herewell', Tyriswell' quartam partem unius feodi, et ipsa de rege.

Item Willelmus de Sandeby tenet de ea in Sandeby, Burton', March', Hapwurth, [4] Misterton', Warsop', Wellum feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege.

Item Alicia de Evermue tenet de ea in Thorp' quartam partem unius feodi, et illa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Hugo de Capella et filius [5] Roberti de Sumervill' tenent de ea in Oxton' feodum unius militis, et illa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus de Furnellis tenet de ea in Normanton', Gresthorp' quartam partem feodi unius militis, et illa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Fulco de Hotoft tenet de ea in Flintham dimidium feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item prior de Schellord' tenet de ea in Saxindall' feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.


[1] I.42 reads Wulrinton'.
[2] Read Bevercotes, as in I.42.
[3] I.42 reads Robertus.
[4] Read Babwurd, as in I.42.
[5] Read filia, as in I.43.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 987

I.6-24.(I.41-49.) - cont.

Item Thomas de Chaurcys tenet de ea in Marcham duo feoda militum, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento. Error, sicut patet in memorandis anni xviij. Regis Edwardi filii Edwardi termini Michaelis. [1]

Item Willelmus Ruffus et Muvesinus de Hercy tenent de ea in Weston' cfimidium feodum militis, et ipsa tenet de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus [2] de Ayvill' et Johannes de Nunvilers [read Lunvilers] tenent de ea in Skeggeby feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege de antiquo feoffamento.

Item Ricardus de Normanvill' et Henricus de Walkeg' [3] tenent de ea in Karl', [4] Gedling', Stoke et Weston' feodum unius militis. et ipsa de rege etc.

Item Thurstan Dispensarius et Johannes de Orreby tenent de ea in Eperston' terciam partem unius feodi, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Walterus de Thuck' tenet de ea in Klem [5] dimidium feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Agatha de Thuck' tenet de ea ibidem, occasione warde heredis Petri de Klem, [5] dimidium feodum militis, et ipsa tenet de rege etc.

Item Hugo Pincerna tenet de ea in Hakerton' [6] unum feodum militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Thomas filius Willelmi tenet de ea in Plumtr', Normanton', Stanton', Kewurth, Rotington' et Rempeston' [7] per dimidium feodum j. militis, et comitissa de rege.

Nigellus de Mundevill', Willelmus de Staunford', [8] et Rogerus de Lovetoft tenent de ea in Wyshou feodum unius militis, et comitissa de rege etc.

Item Willelmus de Boues tenet de ea in Cortlingstok' et Rempeston' feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Petrus de Stanford tenet de ea in Staunford' super Sore feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Simon de Hedon' tenet de ea in Uuethorp' tres partes unius feodi, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus et Willelmus Barry tenent de ea in Torloueton' [9] feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus Malebisse et abbas de Wellebek' tenent de ea in Knyveton' tres partes unius feodi militis, et comitissa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Galfridus de le Fremud' [10] et participes eius tenent de ea in Flintham dimidium feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus filius Willelmi de Collston' tenet de ea in Collston' dimidium feodum j. militis, et comitissa de rege de veteri feoffamento.


[1] K.R. Memoranda, no. 100. Communia (Recorda) Michaelmas, 12d. Cf. p. 979, which reads Marnham.
[2] I.43 reads Johannes.
[3] Read Walleg, as in I.43.
[4] Read Karleton, as in I.43.
[5] Read Kelum, as in I.43.
[6] Read Hokirton, as in I.43.
[7] Read Clippeston', as in I.43.
[8] Read Stafford', as in I.44.
[9] I.44 reads Thortloueton.
[10] I.44 reads le Fremund.

988 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.6-24.(I.41-49.) - cont.

Item Hugo filius Radulfi et Willelmus de Batheleg' tenent de ea in eadem [1] et Sutmuscham [2] terciam partem unius feodi, et comitissa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus filius Roberti de Riseleg' tenet de ea in Riseleg' xiij. [3] partem feodi unius militis, et comitissa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Ricardus Poutrel tenet de ea in Thurmeston' feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento. Nota.

Item Philippa de Tylly tenet de ea in Upton' et Marcham feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Lovetot tenet de ea in Kerkolviston' feodum unius militis, et comitissa de rege de veteri feoffamento. Nota.

Item Thomas filius Willelmi tenet de ea in Clareburg' et West Draycote [4] tres partes unius feodi militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item idem Thomas tenet de ea in Breydiston' dimidium feodum unius militis, et comitissa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Lathum tenet de ea in Alfirton', Normanton' [5] duas partes [duorum feodorum, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento [6]].

Item Radulfus de Rerisby tenet de ea in Plesleg', Kyrkeby, [7] Oxton' feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item prior de Novo Loco tenet de ea in Ruethorn feodum unius militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Hubertus de Burgo tenet de ea in Weteleg', Misterton' cum pertinenciis quartam partem unius militis, et ipsa de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Ricardus de Marcham, Henricus de Walleg' et Ricardus de Normanvill' tenent de ea in Getling' ij. partes unius feodi, et ipsa de rege etc.

Oliverus de Ayneourt tenet septemdecim feoda militum et dimidium et quartam partem unius feodi, de quibus

Willelmus de Aslacton' et abbas de Wellebeck tenent de eo in Aslacton' unum feodum et dimidium, et ipse [Oliverus [8]] de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Idem Oliverus tenet in Sutton', Graneby unum feodum militis de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Gerardus de Fanecurt tenet de eo in Hiding' et Kyingon' [9] feodum unius militis, et Oliverus de domino rege in capite.

Item Robertus de Eynecurt [10] tenet de eo in Radeclive feodum unius militis, et ipse de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Gilbertus de Kerkolviston' tenet de eo in Kerkolviston' dimidium feodum unius militis, et ipse de rege de veteri feoffamento.


[1] I.44 reads in Bathel'.
[2] I.44 reads Sudmuscham.
[3] I.44 reads tricesimam.
[4] Read Drayton'.
[5] I.45 reads Northon'.
[6] Supplied from I.45.
[7] I.45 reads Chirbroc.
[8] Supplied from I.45.
[9] Read Kynalton, i.e. Kinoulton.
[10] I.45 reads Ayncurd.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 989

I.6-24.(I.41-49.) - cont.

Item Rogerus de Aynecurt tenet de eo in Kapetorp' [1] quartam partem unius feodi, et ipse de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Walterus de Goushil tenet de eo in Flintham feodum unius militis, et ipse de rege de veteri feoffamento. Nota.

Item Ricardus de Jorz tenet de eo in Birton' feodum unius militis, et ipse de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento. Nota.

Item Reginaldus de Anisleg', Sibilla de Sancta Mar', et Adam de Ridewale [2] tenent de eo in Bulecote feodum unius militis, et ipse de domino rege etc.

Walterus de Goushill et Robertus de Eyncurt [3] tenent de eo duo feoda militum, et ipse de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Benedictus filius Thome tenet de eo in Rouliston' et Kelum feodum unius militis et dimidium, et ipse de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Thomas de Bella Aqua et Rogerus de Cruche tenent de eo in Hokerton' dimidium feodum unius militis, et ipse de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Oliverus de Eyncurt [4] tenet de [5] eo in Clypeston' et Holingfeld' [5] cum pertinenciis duo feoda in capite de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Radulfus Basset tenet de eo in Languad' [6] feodum unius militis, et ipse de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento. Derby.

Item Rogerus de Eyncurt [7] tenet de eo in Morton' feodum unius militis, et ipse de rege in capite de veteri feoffamento. Derby.

Item Willelmus de Heriz tenet in Willamthorp' dimidium feodum unius militis, et ipse de rege in capite de veteri feoffamento. Derby.

Item Willelmus Kyriel tenet de eo in Horsepol et Sutton' dimidium feodum mllitis, et ipse de rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus de Wyverton' tenet de eo in Wyverton' dimidium feodum militis, et ipse de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item de Honore de Lancastria tenentur octo feoda in comitatu Notingh' et tercia pars unius feodi, de quibus.

Willelmus de Grendon' tenet dimitfium feodum in Babworth' [8] de veteri feoffamento.

[Item Thomas de Mareseye, qui est in custodia W. Eboracensis archiepiscopi, tenet in Gameliston' feodum unius militis et dimidium de eodem honore de veteri feoffamento. [9]]

Item Robertus de Furneyus, [10] Robertus de Sancto Georgio tenent in Bothemishil [11] feodum unius militis de eodem honore de veteri feoffamento.

Item abbas de Swynesheved [12] tenet feodum unius militis in Cotegrave de eodem honore [de veteri feoffamento [9]].


[1] Read Knapetorp', as in I.45.
[2] I.46 reads Rideware.
[3] I.46 reads Aycurd.
[4] I.46 reads Oliverus Dayncurd.
[5] These six erroneous words are in both versions. Cf. p. 981.
[6] I.46 reads Langwath.
[7] I.46 reads Ayncourd.
[8] I.47 reads Habword.
[9] Supplied from I.47.
[10] I.47 reads Furnell'.
[11] I.47 reads Bodmeshill'.
[12] I.47 reads Swinesheveth,

990 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.6-24.(I.41-49.) - cont.

Item Michael de Mauneuers [1] tenet in Holm, Gameleston', Atbolton', Lambecote, Buketon' feodum unius militis de eodem honore [de [2] veteri feoffamento].

Item Nicholaus de Wycheford' tenet in Flintham feodum unius militis de eodem honore [de [2] veteri feoffamento],

Item Johannes de Vylers tenet in Calverton' quartam partem feodi unius militis de eodem honore [de [2] veteri feoffamento].

Item Willelmus le Butyler tenet in Calverton', Crophil feodum unius militis de eodem honore [de [2] veteri feoffamento].

Item idem Johannes de Vylers tenet in Newbolt' [3] et Ouethorp' feodum unius militis de eodem honore [de [2] veteri feoffamento]. Derb'.

Item Robertus de Harstan tenet in Sutton' in Dal xvj. partem feodi unius militis de eodem honore [de [2] veteri feoffamento]. Derb'.

Comes Lincolnie tenuit [4] duo feoda et dimidium in comitatu Notingh', de quibus.

Johannes de Gatton' tenet in Clipeston' feodum unius militis de feodo comitis de veteri feoffamento.

Item Hugo de Weston' tenet dimidium feodum militis in Weston' de eodem honore [de [2] veteri feoffamento].

Thomas filius Willelmi tenet in Breydiston' dimidium feodum militis de eodem honore [de [2] veteri feoffamento]. Derb'.

Item Johannes Burdon' tenet in Buketon' dimidium feodum militis de eodem honore de veteri feoffamento.

Robertus de Everingham tenet in comitatu Notingh' quinque feoda militum et dimidium, de quibus.

Reginaldus Ursel et Hugo de Tytheby tenent in Gedling', Carleton' et Stoke dimidium feodum militis de eodem honore [de [2] veteri feoffamento]. Nota.

Robertus de Everingham tenet in Leynton' [5] in dominico feodum unius militis et dimidium, et in Schelford' in dominico feodum unius militis et dimidium [de [2] veteri feoffamento].

Item Thomas de Muschamp' tenet in Northmuschamp' [6] et Calnaton' [7] feodum unius militis de eodem honore.

Item abbas de La Dale tenet in Hocbrok' [8] feodum unius militis de eodem honore. Derb'.

Willelmus Bardolf tenet in comitatu Notingh' et Derb' vij. feoda et dimidium, de quibus.

Hugo de la Basache [9] tenet in Caruelton', [10] Gedeling' et Stoke dimidium feodum militis de veteri feoffamento.


[1] I.47 reads Mauners or Manuers.
[2] Supplied from I.47-48.
[3] I.47 reads Neubald.
[4] I.47 reads tenet.
[5] Read Lexinton' as in I.48.
[6] I.48 reads Nordmuscham.
[7] I.48 reads Kalnathon'.
[8] I.48 reads Okebrock'.
[9] I.48 reads Basage.
[10] Read Carleton', or Karleton' as in I.48.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 991

I.6-24.(I.41-49.) - cont.

Item idem Willelmus Bardolf' tenet in Schelford' in dominico feodum unius militis et dimidium.

Et idem Willelmus tenet in Egginton', Alwaldiston', Okebrok', Amboldeston' et Bolton' v. feoda militum et dimidium de veteri feoffamento. Derby.

Comes Leycestrie tenet dimidium feodum militis in comitatu Notingh' quod Robertus de Lathom tenet de eo in Edwalton', [et omnes alie terre quas habet in dicto comitatu tenentur ab eodem per liberam firmam [1]].

(I.52-55.)

Gilbertus de Gaunt [2] tenet in comitatu Notingh' octo feoda militum et dimidium, de quibus.

Willelmus de Sutton' de eo tenet in Eykering xxam partem feodi militis [de [3] veteri feoffamento].

Item Adam de Novo Mercato tenet de eo in Whatton', Aslacton' duo feoda militum [de [3] veteri feoffamento].

Item Radulfus filius Petri et tres participes sui tenent de eo in Hokeswrth' [4] feodum unius militis [de [3] veteri feoffamento].

Hugo filius Radulfi tenet de eo in Ilkesdon' ij. partes unius feodi [de [3] veteri feoffamento]. Derby.

Item Robertus le Vavasur et Nicholaus filius Johannis [de [3] Henouere] tenent de eo in Schippeleg' duas partes feodi [de [3] veteri feoffamento]. Derby.

Item Radulfus de Herford' et Robertus de Muschamp tenent de eo in Stanton' dimidium feodum militis [de [3] veteri feoffamento]. Derby.

Item Henricus de Buketon' tenet de eo in Breydeston' dimidium feodum militis [de [3] veteri feoffamento]. Derby.

Item Willelmus de Sutton' tenet de eo in Sutton' viij. partem unius feodi. Derby.

Item comes Lincolnie tenet de eo in Knesall' cum pertinenciis tria feoda militum de veteri feoffamento.

Item Comes de Arundel tenet in comitatu Notingh' duo feoda militum, quartam partem et xxam partem feodi militis, de quibus.

Johannes Bossart tenet in Thorp Bossard iiij. partem unius feodi et xxam partem unius feodi de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Schepping' tenet de eo in Smytheby dimidium feodum militis de veteri feoffamento.

Egidius de Berkelay [5] tenet de eo in Childecot' dimidium feodum militis [de [3] veteri feoffamento]. Derby.

Item Willelmus de Albinaco tenet [6] in comitatu Notingh' duo feoda militum de domino rege in Orskinton' cum soca.


[1] Supplied from I.49, where the corresponding entry resembles more closely the entry printed above, p. 982.
[2] I.52 reads Gand.
[3] Supplied from I.52-53.
[4] I.52 reads Hokiswurd.
[5] I.53 reads Gylo de Berclay.
[6] Read tenuit, as in I.53

992 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.6-24.(I.52-55.) - cont.

Episcopus Lincolniensis tenet in comitatu Notingh' tria feoda militum et dimidium et quartam partem et xxam partem unius feodi, de quibus

Nigellus de Lysurs tenet de eo in Normanton', Fletburg', Stokum et Demethorp' tria feoda militum de veteri feoffamento.

Radulfus de Crumbwell' tenet de eo in Crumbwell' dimidium feodum militis de veteri feoffamento.

Idem Radulfus tenet de eo in Westhalum vt am partem unius feodi de veteri feoffamento. Derby.

Item Willelmus de Bella Aqua tenet de eo in Aldisworth' xam partem feodi militis [de veteri feoffamento [1]].

Patricius de Chaurces tenet in comitatu Notingh' duo feoda militum, que Philippus de Cortlingstok' tenet de eo in Rempiston'.

Nicholaus de Moles tenet in comitatu Notingh' [scilicet] in Wydmerpol, Gunolviaton', Winefeld', et Tybechelf' tria feoda militum et dimidium, racione custodie filiarum et heredum Johannis de Heriz, et heredes tenent de rege in capite.

Sallowe cum soca est in manu domini regis, [2] et tenentur inde duo feoda, tercia pars unius feodi, et xl. pars feodi militis, unde Patricius de Chaurces [3] tenet in Hoppwell' feodum unius militis [de dicto honore [1]]. Derby,

Hugo filius Radulfi tenet in Wivelesthorp sextam partem unius feodi [de predicto honore1]. Derby.

Ricardus de Kinstan tenet in Draycot' xvj. partem unius feodi [de eodem honore [1]]. Derby,

Robertus Ingram reddit jiro terra quam tenet in Eyton' duos s., sive scutagium sit ad plus vel ad minus, [de eodem honore]. Derby.

Hugo de Toveri [4] tenet ibidem xvjam partem j. feodi de eodem honore. Derby.

Item Willelmus filius Rogeri et Elyas tenent [ibidem] xvj. partem unius feodi de eodem honore. Derby.

[Item [1] Nigellus de Langeford' tenet in Hopwell' feodum j. militis de eodem honore.]

Galfridus Dispens' tenet in Staveleg', Barleg', Hekerig', [5] cum pertinenciis feodum unius militis, racione custodie warde terre et heredis Roberti Musard, et heres debet tenere de domino rege in capite.

[Item [1] idem habet in Tyscinton' in wapentacio de Wirk', unde non fit inquisicio.]

Albreda de Bassingburn' tenet in Brigeford' et Harewud' duo feoda militum racione warde heredis Johannis Biset.


[1] Supplied from I.53-54.
[2] By the death of Hugh of Pateshull, bishop of Coventry and Lichfield.
[3] I.54 reads Saucheverel in error.
[4] Read Teverey, as in I.54.
[5] Read Hinkershil'.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 993

I.6-24.(I.52-55.) - cont.

Episcopus Karleolensis tenet in Peverelthorp dimidium feodum militis pro custodia [filii [1] et] heredis Johannis de Veteri Ponte.

Idem tenet in Chelardeston' quartam partem unius feodi pro custodia heredum Philippi Marck'. Derby.

Johanna Wake, que fuit uxor Hugonis Wake, habet custodiam terre et heredis Hugonis Wake, scilicet Cestrefeld' cum pertinenciis wapentachii, exceptis xvj. libratis terre quas Willelmus de Percy tenet nomine unius heredum Willelmi de Bruera, et dicta Johanna cum aliis heredibus Willelmi de Bruera tam de manerio de Cestrefeld' quam de aliis terris in pluribus comitatibus tenent per servicium trium feodorum militum, ut in Cestrefeld', Sneynton', Axisminstr', Kyngeswere in Sumerset, et hoc est de feoffamento Regis Johannis. Derby.

Gerardus de Oddingheseles tenet in comitatu Notingh' feodum unius militis quod Willelmus Samson' tenet de eo in Eperston' et Undel. [2]

De Honore de Richemund tenentur in comitatu Notingh' ij. feoda militum, de quibus.

Jolanus de Nevill' tenet in Rolliston' cum pertinenciis feodum unius militis de veteri feoffamento.

Ricardus de Sutton' tenet in Sutton', Karleton' et Meringes feodum unius militis [de1 eodem honore],

Baldewinus de Panton' tenet in Nortmuschamp dimidium feodum militis de feodo abbatis de Burgo.

(I.37-41.)

FEODA MILITUM QUE TENENTUR IN COMITATIBUS NOT' ET DERB' QUI NON HABENT BREVIA DE HABENDO SCUTAGIO.

Comes Derb' tenet xxviij. feoda militum et dimidium et terciam partem unius feodi et viij. partem unius feodi, de quibus.

Ricardus [3] de Vernun xl.s. pro feodo unius militis in Haddon', Basselowe quod tenet de comite, et comes de rege. Derby.

De Willelmo de Mungumeri x.m. iiij.s. iiij.d. pro tribus feodis militum et tercia parte et decima parte feodi unius militis in Merston', Cubbel' cum pertinenciis que tenet de comite de Ferrariis, et comes de rege [in [1] capite]. Derby.

De Sewallo filio Henrici xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Hoka quod tenet de eodem comite. Derby.

De Radulfo de Picheford' xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Sutton' quod tenet de comite, et comes de rege. Derby.

De Serlone de Munchoye xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Yhildirleg' quod tenet de eodem comite. Derby.


[1] Supplied from I., pp. 54, 55, 37 respectively.
[2] Read Wudeburg, as in I.55, where the entry reads:- Willelmus Sampson tenet Eperiston' et Wudeburg' pro feodo unius militis de baronia de Odinghes' de veteri feoffamento.
[3] Read De Ricardo, as in I.37.

994 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.6-24.(I.37-41.) - cont.

De Waltero de Ribuf xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Etewell' quod tenet de eodem comite. Derby.

De Henrico de Braylisford xx.s pro dimidio feodo militis in Braylesford quod tenet de eodem comite. Derby.

De Ricardo de Herthil x.s. pro quarta parte feodi unius militis in Middelton' quod tenet de eodem comite. Derby.

De Johanne de Chandos xl.s. pro feodo unius militis in Mugginton' quod tenet de eodem comite. Derby.

De Roberto de Schelford' x.s. pro quarta parte feodi unius militis in Murcamston' quod tenet de eodem comite.

De Thoma de Cursun [1] xxxij.s. pro quatuor partibus feodi unius militis in Ketleston' quod tenet de eodem comite. Derby.

De Galfrido de Bakepiz xxx s. pro tribus partibus feodi militis in Alcmunton' quod tenet de eodem comite. Derby.

De Henrico de Hertishorn xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Hertishorn quod tenet de eodem comite.

De Nicholao Meverel et participibus suis x.s. pro quarta parte feodi in Lek quod tenet de eodem comite.

De Roberto de Tuk' et Galfrido de Beck j.m. pro tercia parte feodi militis in Hilton' quod tenet de eodem comite.

De Roberto de Dun iiij.l. pro ij. feodis militum quod [2] tenet in Breydeston' cum pertinenciis de eodem comite.

De Willelmo filio Herberti xxx.s. pro tribus partibus feodi unius militis in Eyss cum pertinenciis quod [3] tenet de eodem comite.

De Waltero de Stretton' et Hawisia de Dun x.s. pro quarta parte feodi militis in Braceleg' [4] cum pertinenciis de eodem comite.

De Johanne de Bakepiz xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Barton' cum pertinenciis de [4] eodem comite.

De Olivero de Eyncurt et Matillide uxore eius x.s. pro quarta parte feodi militis in Boyleston' cum [5] pertinenciis de eodem comite.

De Roberto le Cursun [6] xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Twyford' quod [5] tenet de eodem comite.

De Radulfo de Beufey ij.m. pro duabus partibus feodi militis in Trusseleg' cum [5] pertinenciis quod tenet de eodem comite.

De Hamundo de Sapirton' x.s. pro quarta parte feodi militis in Sapirton' cum pertinenciis de eodem feodo.

De Adam de Edneshovere xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Edneshovere de eodem feodo.

De Henrico de Hotot xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Iolgrave cum pertinenciis de eodem feodo.

De Normanno de Suleny xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Neuton' de eodem feodo.

De Willelmo filio Galfridi de Greseleg' xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Linton' de eodem feodo.

De Waltero de Stretton' xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Stretton' de eodem feodo.


[1] I.38 reads le Cursun.
[2] Read que, as in I.38.
[3] Read quas, as in I.38.
[4] Read Bradeleg'. as in I.38.
[5] I.38 reads de eodem feodo.
[6] I.38 reads de Cursun.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 995

I.6-24.(I.37-41.) - cont.

De herede Bertrami de Vernun xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Fornewerk' de eodem feodo.

De Ricardo de Hertishorn xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Hertishorn de eodem feodo.

De Roberto filio Willelmi de Stanton' xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Stonstanton' de eodem feodo.

De hominibus de Westerlek' xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Westerlek' de eodem feodo. Notingham.

De Roberto de Cursun viij.s. pro quinta parte feodi militis in Kettleston' de eodem feodo.

De Radulfo filio Nicholai x.s. pro quarta parte feodi militis in Thurverton' de eodem feodo. Not'.

De Willelmo de Greseleg' et Gilberto de Setgrave xxx.s. pro tribus partibus feodi in Linton' de eodem feodo.

De Willelmo de Stafford' et Johanne de Chaundos xl.s. pro feodo unius militis in Rodburn' de eodem feodo.

De Henrico de Chaumbreys xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Brunolviston' cum pertinencfis de eodem feodo.

De Gerardo de Fanecurt xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Wingerwurth' de eodem feodo.

De Alredo de Suleny xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Brocton' de eodem feodo. Not'.

Summa xxviij. feoda et dimidium iija et xma.

Item de eodem comite tenentur duo feoda et tercia pars unius feodi de novo feoffamento, de quibus.

De Serlone de Munchoye j.m. pro tercia parte feodi militis in Spondon'. Derby.

De Radulfo filio Nicholai iiij.a. pro decima parte feodi militis ibidem.

De Nicholao de Tutebirst [1] iiij.s. pro decima parte feodi militis ibidem.

De Roberto le Wyne xl.d. pro xij. parte feodi militis.

De Ricardo de Grey xl.s. pro uno feodo militis ibidem.

De Radulfo de Cursun x.s. pro quarta parte feodi militis ibidem.

De Willelmo Oter v.s. viij.d. pro septima parte feodi militis ibidem.

De Henrico de Kardoyl dimidia marca pro sexta parte feodi militis ibidem [de [2] novo feoffamento].

De Honore Cestrie tenentur quinque feoda et dimidium et sexta pars unius feodi, de quo subscripti tenent:-

De Roberto Tuschet v.m. pro uno feodo et duabus partibus unius feodi in Marketon' cum soka. Derby.

De Rogero de Monte Alto viij.l. pro iiij. feodis militum in Waleton', Meysham cum pertinenciis. Derby.

De Honore Hugonis Wake de Brunne.

De Johanne Torkard iiij.l. pro duobus feodis militum in Hukenhall' cum pertinenciis. Not'.


[1] I.40 reads Tutesburs.
[2] Supplied from I.40.

996 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.6-24.(I.37-41.) - cont.

De Johanna relicta Hugonis Wake xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Kyleburn'. Derb',

Feoda Radulfi de Mortuo Mari.

De abbate de La Dale x.a. pro quarta parte feodi militis in Trowell' cum pertinenciis,

De Willelmo de Riseleg' xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Bramcote cum pertinenciis.

De Willelmo de Trowell' j.m. pro tercia parte feodi unius militis in Stanvord' [1] et Lek' cum pertinenciis.

De Honore de Aufirton'. [2]

De Roberto de Cokefeld' x.a. pro quarta parte feodi militis in Nutehall' cum pertinenciis.

De Rogero de Watenhow xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Watenhow.

De Henrico de Birchewude dimidia marca pro sexta parte feodi militis in Bramcote cum pertinenciis.

De Willelmo de Wudeburg' xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Wudeburg' cum pertinenciis.

De Radulfo filio Nicholai xl.s. pro feodo unius militis in Moniass cum pertinenciis. Derby.

De Honore Peverel.

(I. 49-52.)

De Roberto de Strelleg' xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Stretleg' cum pertinenciis de honore Peverel.

De Ricardo de Wiverton' viij.s. pro quinta parte feodi militis in Wiverton' cum pertinenciis de eodem honore.

De Ranulfo le Poer x.s. pro quarta parte feodi militis in Penkeston' de eodem honore. Derby.

De Galfrido de Stapilford' xl.s. pro j. feodo militis in Stapilford' cum pertinenciis de eodem honore.

De Cecilia de Menyl xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Kynewaldemers de eodem honore. Derby.

De villata de Glapwell' xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Glapwell' cum pertinenciis de eodem honore.

De Rogero le Bretun xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Waleton' cum pertinenciis de eodem honore.

De Isolda de Grey xj.l. pro quinque feodis militum et dimidio in Coddenhovere cum pertinenciis de eodem honore.

De Galfrido de Bakepuz xxx.s. pro tribus partibus feodi militis in Riseleg' cum pertinenciis de eodem honore.

De Gerardo de Rodes xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Clifton' et Langar cum pertinenciis de eodem honore. Not'.

De Hugone filio Radulfi xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Greseleg' cum pertinenciis de eodem honore.

De Johanne de Beuchamp xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Bestou cum pertinenciis de eodem honore. Not'.


[1] Read Stanford, as in I.41.
[2] I.41 reads Alfirton',

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 997

I.6-24.(I.49-52.) - cont.

De Radulfo de Normanvill' xij.s. v.d. pro quarta parte et xvija parte unius feodi militis in Thorp' de eodem honore. Not'.

De Willelmo de Morteyn xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Cossall', Wllaveton' [1] cum pertinenciis de eodem honore. Not'.

De Petro filio Osberti viij.s. pro quinta parte feodi unius militis in Stanton' de eodem honore.

De Johanne de Oireby xxx.s. pro tribus partibus feodi unius militis in Baseford' cum pertinenciis de eodem honore. Not'.

De Petro de Goldington' x.s. pro quarta parte feodi unius militis in Colewie de eodem honore. Not'.

De Roberto le Vavasur xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Bilburg' de eodem honore. Not'.

De Willelmo filio Radulfi de Sibetorp' xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Sibethorp' de eodem honore.

Isti tenent in capite de domino Rege.

De Willelmo de Ferrariis xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Bingham quod tenet de domino rege in capite.

De Radulfo Basset xl.s. pro feodo militis in Coleston' quod tenet de rege in capite.

De Radulfo Gernun xl.s. pro feodo militis in Barnwell' [de novo feoffamento [2]] de rege in capite. Derby.

De Willelmo de Morteyn xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Eyum quod tenet de domino rege in capite. Derby.

De Roberto de Hotot v.s. pro viij. parte feodi militis in Screveton' de rege in capite. Not'.

De Roberto Daft x.s. pro quarta parte feodi militis in Algcrthorp' de rege in capite.

De Honore de Birum.

De hominibus de Lutchirch' ij.m. pro duabus partibus feodi militis in Lutchirche de predicto honore. Derb'.

De Alano Malet liij.s. iiij.d. pro uno feodo et iij. parte j. feodi in Cotegrave. Not'.

De Honore W. de Percy.

De Willelmo Rosel xl.s. pro uno feodo militis in Deneby. Derb'.

De hominibus de Kyrkehalum x.s. pro quarta parte feodi militis in Kirkehalum. Derb'.

De Honore de Mumbray.

De Roberto le Sauvage vj.l. pro tribus feodis militum in Egrum cum pertinenciis.

De Hugone de Serleby xxx.s. pro tribus partibus feodi militis in Serleby.


[1] I.50 reads Wullaveton'.
[2] Supplied from I.50.

998 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.6-24.(I.49-52.) - cont.

Feoda Radulfi de Fressenvill' de baronia Huberti filii Radulfi.

De Radulfo de Fressenvill' xj.l. iiij.s. pro quinque feodis militum [et dimidio [1]] et xma parte unius feodi in Boney, Barton', Brademare, Scardeclive, Cruch, cum pertinenciis.

De Radulfo filio Radulfi de Rerisby xl.s. pro feodo unius militis in Essovere de eodem feodo. Derb'.

De Rogero de Sumervill' xl.s, pro uno feodo in Blacwell' cum pertinenciis. Derb'.

De Johanne de Orreby xl.s. pro uno feodo militis ibidem. Derb'.

De Reginaldo de Anisleg' iiij .1. pro duobus feodis militum in Anisleg' cum pertinenciis.

De Roberto Dethec x.s. pro quarta parte feodi militis in Chilewell'.

De abbate de Derleg' iiij.l. pro duobus feodis militum in Rippeleg' cum pertinenciis. Derb'.

De Simone filio Simonis xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Middilton' cum pertinenciis. Derb'.

De Matheo de Haversech xx.s. pro dimidio feodo militis in Haversech cum pertinenciis. Derb'.

De Honore Johannis de Stutevill' de medietate baronie Huberti filii Radulfi.

De Johanne de Stutevlll' xx.l. pro quindecim [2] feodis militum in Kirkeby cum pertinenciis.

I.1-6.

NOMINA VILLARUM ET EORUM QUI DICUNT SE TENERE ALITER QUAM PER SERVICIUM MILITARE IN COMITATU NOTINGHAM, SCILICET

Prior de Blye tenet totam villam de Blie in dominico in pura elemosina de honore de Tykehil, exceptis xl.s. quos abbas de Rupe tenet in eadem villa in escambium molendini de Serleby.

Idem prior tenet totam villam de Bucketon' de eodem honore in pura elemosina de feodo Johannis Burdon' de novo feoffamento.

Idem prior tenet totam villam de Eleton' in pura elemosina de eodem fionore de feodo Rogeri de Bully.

Idem prior tenet quinque parvas bovatas terre in Bevercote de feodo Willelmi de Bevercote in pura elemosina.

Mareseie. Prior de Mareseie tenet in Maresei ij. bovatas terre in pura elemosina de feodo Thome heredis Rogeri de Mareseie.

Hodishac. Willelmus de Kelesholt, abbas de Wellebeck', Thomas de Hodishac, Elyas de Empervill' tenent in Hodishack' cum socha xij. bovatas terre pro xiiij.s. per annum.

Karleton in L. Prior de Wirkesop tenet unam bovatam terre in Karleton' in Lindrick' in pura elemosina de feodo Roberti de Furnellis.

Wudehusse. Osbertus Selveyn tenet dimidiam carucatam terre in Wudehusse de feodo Matillidis de Luveto et reddit per annum de firma xx.s.


[1] Supplied from I.61.
[2] Read x as in I.51.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 999

I.1-6 - cont.

Dunham. Radulfus filius Nicholai tenet in Dunham, Drayton' medietatem de Ragenhil' de dono domini Henrici Regis et nullum scutagium dat.

Walkeringham. Prior de Novo Loco tenet duas partes ville de Walkeringham et xj. bovatas terre in Misterton' in pura elemosina de dono Regis Henrici avi Regis Henrici et de dono Regis Johannis, et fuit de dominico regis de socka de Oswaldebeck'.

Idem prior tenet totam villam de Papilwik' in dominico in pura elemosina de dono Regis Henrici avi Henrici Regis.

Tylne. Rogerus de Lanum tenet xx, bovatas terre in Tylne cum molendino de dono Thome de Lanum et reddit per annum xl.s. et Thomas feoffatus fuit per dominum Johannem Regem pro uno spervario, et fuit de soca de Oswoldebeck'.

[Clayw]urd. +Bertea+ de Hardredesel' tenet totam villam de Clawurth' exceptis sex bovatis terre que tenentur in dotem.

[Gre]nleg'. Henricus le Noreys tenet quinque decim bovatas terre in Grenley, vj. bovatas terre in Stretton', unam bovatam terre in Leyrton', de feodo Thome de Stretton' per servicium duorum calcarium deauratorum, et ipse Thomas reddit tantum, et fuit de socka de Oswoldebeck'.

[Osber]ton'. Mauvesinus de Hersy tenet totam villam de Osberton' de comitissa Augii per sic quod sit dispensarius eius. Et heres de Alfirton' habet terram et defendit eam per tale servicium.

[Lund.] Adam de Hayton', Willelmus filius Huberti tenent ij. partes unius carucate terre in Lund, Clumber, Retford' et Mistirton' de honore de Tykehil' pro uno equo, uno sacco constabulario de Tyk' quando ibit in Walliam, et nullum scutagium dant.

[Kuk]eney. Henricus de Faucunberge tenet duas carucatas terre in Kukeney de domino rege in capite per seriantiam, scilicet quod ipse debet invenire ferra palefridi domini regis dum perhendinat apud Mamisfeld', unde Hugo de Holebeck', Radulfus de la Runce, Willelmus de Holebeck', Agnes filia Thome tenent de eo in eadem villa sex bovatas terre et reddunt de firma per annum xij.s. Et abbas de Wellebeck' tenet de eo iiij. bovatas terre in pura elemosina.

[Bild]estorp. Galfridus Tregoz tenet totam villam de Bildestorp' in dominico de socka de Mamisfeld' de dono Roberti de Grenl' cum filia sua in libera maritagio, et nullum servicium ei inde facit nec alibi.

Oswoldebeck. Henricus de Hastinges tenet totam villam de Oswoldebeck' cum socka, scilicet Oswoldebeck', Leyrton', Stretton', Lutilburg', Wetelegsudbeck', Wiston' et Wellum in escambium de domino rege pro terra quam habet in comitatu Cestrie, et capit inde xxxviij.l. et xix.s.

Buketon'. Johannes Burdun tenet iij. bovatas terre in dominico in Buketon' de honore de Tykehil' per servicium unius equi et unius sacci quando constabularius debet ire in Walliam in servicio domini regis.

Karleton'. Prior de Shelford' tenet ij. bovatas terre in Karleton' in pura elemosina de feodo Johannis Bardolf'.

Capitulum de Suwell' tenet xj. bovatas terre in Neuton' in pura elemosina de feodo Roberti de Everingham.

1000 A.D. 1242-1243.

I.1-6 - cont.

Lamleg.' Radulfus de Crumbwell' tenet totam villam de Lameleg' de honore de Tykehil et reddit per annum xl.l.

Colwick'. Reginaldus de Colwick' tenet totam villam de Colwick' in capite de rege de honore Peverel per servicium xij. sagittarum per annum.

Kalverton'. Capitulum de Suwell' et priorissa de Brewude tenent tres partes ville de Kalverton' in pura elemosina de eodem honore.

Saltirford. Prior de Landa tenet villam de Saltirford' in pura elemosina.

Prior de Turgerton' tenet totam villam de Turgerton' et Fiskerton in pura elemosina de feoffamento Oliveri de Eyncurt.

Ludham. Ludham cum soca est in manu domini regis, scilicet Gunthorp', Katthorp', Ulvistorp' et vj. bovate terre in Birton'.

Oscinton'. Hospitalarii Ierosolyme tenent totam villam de Oscinton' in pura elemosina de honore Byrun.

Northkarleton.' Prior de Templo tenet unam bovatam terre in Northkarleton' in libera elemosina de feodo Roberti de Everingham de veteri feoffamento,

Crophil'. Capitulum de Suwelle et prior de Lenton' tenent totam villam de Crophil in pura elemosina de feodo J. de Vilers, exceptis xiiij. bovatis terre quas Willelmus Gernet [1] de eodem J. pro vj.d. per annum.

[Hi]keling'. Robertus de Harestan tenet duas partes ville de Hikeling' per liberam firmam pro ix.m. per annum de feodo comitis Lincolnie.

[T]ytheby. Hugo de Tytheby tenet medietatem de Tydheby de feodo Isolde de Gray et reddit per annum dimidiam marcam de firma pro omnibus.

[Ma]misfeld' cum [sok]a. Henricus de Hastinges tenet totam villam de Mamisfeld' cum soka, scilicet Wudehus, Sutton' et Nettelwurd', et capit per annum de firma xxxij.l. iij.s. x.d.

[Li]ndeby. Dominus Henricus Rex tenet medietatem de Lindeby et capit inde per annum de firma vij.l. et xiiij.s., et Robertus de Marys tenet alteram medietatem de Lindeby occasione warde Laurencii heredis Laurencii de Sancto Michaele et reddit j. pellern de septem fessis.

[Bu]lewell'. Dominus rex tenet totam villam de Bulewell' cum x. bovatis terre in Hemdeshil et capit inde per annum vij.l.

[Arn]hall'. Herbertus de Nevill' tenet totam villam de Arnhall' et quartam partem ville de Wudeburg' pro quibus reddit per annum x.l.

[Le]nton', Prior de Lenton' tenet totam villam de Lenton'. Radeford', Kyketon', Neuthorp' cum pertinenciis in pura elemosina pertinentes ad abbaciam.

[Br]unesleg'. Gilbertus de Brunisleg' tenet dimidium carucatam terre in Brunesleg', dimidiam carucatam terre in Brocolvistow per servicium inveniendi unum affrum, unum saccum in exercitu regis Wallie per seriantiam.


[1] Supply tenet.

NOTTINGHAM AND DERBY. 1001

I.1-6 - cont.

[Su]tton'. Robertus Passeis tenet Sutton' per servicium inveniendi unum affrum et unum saccum in exercitu Wallie.

[Rad]eclif. Thomas Pykot tenet totam villam de Radeclif' et Kynstan in capite de rege per seriantiam, scilicet ostriciam, de antiquo feoffamento.

Elemosina. Abbas Cestrie tenet totam villam de Weston', Aston', Wilne, Schardelow, Morl', Smalleg' et Kydesl' in pura elemosina de feoffamento Hugonis comitis Cestrie.

Mapirleg'. Ricardus de Sandiacr' solet tenere totam villam de Mapirleg' per servicium inveniendi unam domum ad canes; et Robertus le Vavasur et plures sunt feoffati de eo, set non per servicium militis.

Elemosina. Abbas de Burton' tenet totam villam de Magna Overe, totam villam de Parva Overe, Finderne, Pollack', Willinton' in pura elemosina de dono Henrici Regis, avi Henrici Regis filii Johannis.

In dotem. Clemencia comitissa Cestrie tenet totam villam de Meuton', totam villam de Rependon', totam villam de Engleby, totam villam de Kalne, [1] totam villam de Stanton', totam villam de Tykenhall', totam villam de Waleton', totam villam de Roustloviston', totam villam de Meysham, totam villam de Childecote, totam villam de Neuton', totam villam de Bretteby, totam villam de Smidheby, totam villam de Wivelesle, totam villam de Pakinton', Durandestorp' de honore Cestrie in dotem.

Cotene. Gilbertus de Segrave tenet totam villam de Cotene de honore de Lancastria de uxore G. de Sedgrave pro uno bracheto et uno ligamine per annum.

Elemosina. Abbas de Burton' tenet totam villam de Stapehhul, Bergecote, medietatem de Stanton', Caudwell', Wyneshol', medietatem de Appilby, in capite de rege in pura elemosina.

Iste sunt libertates in quas vicecomes Notinghamie et Derbie non potuit habere ingressum ad faciendam inquisicionem de scutagio secundum quod ultimo preceptum fuit, nec reddiderunt vicecomiti aliquem rotulum de inquisicione illa:-

Wapentachium de Newerk' quod dominus Lincolniensis episcopus tenet in manu sua et non permittit quod vicecomes faciat ibi taleru inquisicionem nec quod homines de wapentachio illo veniant coram vicecomite. Immo dicit ballivus suus quod est inauditum, necdum fecerunt per se aliquam inquisicionem quam vicecomes sciat, nec aliquem rotulum ei reddiderunt.

Wapentachium de Alto Pecco quod Warinus Engayne habet in custodia, nec fecit inquisicionem aliquam, nec aliquem rotulum reddidit vicecomiti.

Wapentachium de Apeltr' et wapentachium de Wirkeswurth' que W. de Ferrariis, comes Derbie, habet in manu sua ad firmam de domino rege, nec fecit aliquam inquisicionem, nec reddidit vicecomiti aliquem rotulum.


[1] Read Kalce.

1002 A.D. 1242-1243.

LINCOLN.

II.498-502.

SCUTAGIUM DOMINI REGIS IN COMITATU LLNCOLNIE.

De Ricardo Tuschet xl.s. de feodo unius militis quod tenet in Heynton' de Galfrido de Beningwurth', et idem Galfridus de Hugone Paynel, et idem Hugo de domino rege in capite.

De Johanne de Nevill' iiij.l. de ij. feodis in Stretton' que idem Johannes tenet de Hugone Paynel, et idem Hugo de domino rege in capite.

De Roberto de Welles xx.s. de dimidio feodo quod tenet de eodem Hugone, et idem Hugo ut supra.

Hawisia de Quency xx.l. de x. feodis que tenet de domino rege in capite.

De Magistro Michaele Belet vj.l. de iij. feodis que tenet in Sythestan, Oudeby et Wylhgheby de Christiana Ledet, et ipsa de domino rege in capite.

De Simone de Kyme xij.l. de vj. feodis que tenet de comite de Ferrariis in Calseby cum pertinenciis, et idem comes de domino rege in capite.

De Idonea de Boydele vj.l. de tribus feodis que tenet de eodem, et idem comes de domino rege in capite in Neubel et Maydenwell'.

De Petro de Lekeburn' lxx.s. xj.d. de uno feodo et dimidio et uno quarterio et una bovata que tenet de eodem comite in Reythesby, et idem comes de domino rege in capite.

De Willelmo de Belesby xx.s. de dimidio feodo quod tenet de eodem comite in Belesby, et idem comes de domino rege in capite.

De eodem comite de Ferrariis l.s. de uno feodo et dimidio in Wyton' que tenet de domino rege ut supra.

De Clemencia de Luviniers [1] xx.s. de dimidio feodo in Appelby quod tenet de domino rege in capite.

De Thoma filio Stephani xx.s. de dimidio feodo in Casewic quod tenet de domino rege in capite.

De Rogero de Huntingfeld' cx.s. de tribus feodis j. quarterio minus que tenet de Petronilla de Croum in Toft et Frampton', et ipsa de domino rege in capite.

De Johanne de Edelinton' xl.s. de uno feodo in Freston' quod est in custodia ipsius Petronille.

De Willelmo de Rupe xl.s. de uno feodo in Freston' quod tenet de eadem Petronilla, et eadem ut supra.

De Thoma de Pincebec xl.s. de uno feodo in Freston' quod tenet de eadem Petronilla, et ipsa ut supra.

De Alexandre de Poynton' x.s. de uno quarterio unius feodi in Freston' quod tenet de eadem Petronilla, et ipsa ut supra.

De Willelmo le Angevyn xl.s. de uno feodo in Quappelad' quod tenet de predicta Petronilla, et ipsa ut supra.

Hugo de Cassingthorp xl.s. de uno feodo in eadem et Herierby quod tenet de predicta Petronilla, et ipsa de domino rege in capite.


[1] Read Lunvilers.

LINCOLN. 1003

II.498-502 - cont.

De fratribus hospitalis Lincolnie xij.s. vj.d. de iiijta parte feodi unius militis et ij. bovatis in Typpehall' [1] quam tenet de predicta Petronilla, et ipsa Petronilla de domino rege in capite.

De duobus liberis hominibus in Welleby j.m. de tercia parte unius feodi quam tenet de predicta Petronilla, et ipsa de domino rege in capite.

De eadem Petronilla iiij.s. ij.d. de herede Thome +Rat+ que est in custodia sua.

De Johanne de Santon' iiij.m. de uno feodo et tercia parte unius feodi in Latton' quod tenet de predicta Petronilla, et ipsa de domino rege in capite.

De Otuelo de Insula xl.s. de uno feodo in Saleclive quod tenet de domino rege in capite.

De Alexandre de Nevill' xl.s. de uno feodo in Askeby et Bottlisford' quod tenet de domino rege in capite.

De eodem Alexandre lxx.s. de uno feodo et dimidio feodo in Scalleby quod tenet de domino rege in capite.

De eodem Alexandre dimidia marca de vj. parte unius feodi in Wadingham quam tenet de domino rege in capite.

De eodem Alexandre xx.s. de dimidio feodo in Hacthorn quod tenet ut supra.

De eodem Alexandre xl.s. de uno feodo in Ingham, Cotes et Glentwrth' quod tenet de domino rege ut supra.

De eodem Alexandre xx.s. de dimidio feodo in Bliburg' quod tenet de domino rege in capite.

De Roberto Wascelln j.m. de tercia parte unius feodi quod tenet de predicto Alexandre, et ipse de domino rege in capite.

De tenentibus de feodo de Scoteny, scilicet Roberti [2] Rat et aliis, iiij.l. x.s. in Otteby et alibi.

De Agatha Trussebut x.s. de quarta parte feodi unius militis in Messingham.

De Rogero de Mubray l.s. de uno feodo et quarta parte unius feodi in Haxiholm et Scalleby quod tenet de domino rege in capite.

De Philippo de Chauncy iij.m. et dimidia de uno feodo et vj. parte unius feodi in Swynehopp, Wralesby et Belesby quod tenet de domino rege in capite.

De Roberto de Nevill' xxx.s. de tribus partibus feodi unius militis in Media Rasne.

De Roberto Hauteyn xx.s. de dimidio feodo in Scredinton'.

De Gracia de Insula xl.s. de uno feodo in Saleby.

De Willelmo de Uudethorp xx.s. de dimidio feodo in eadem.

De Galfrido de Nevill' xx.s. de dimidio feodo in Appelby.

De Simone de Kyme xx.s. de dimidio feodo in Sotteby.

De Waltero de Colevill' xl.s. de uno feodo in Auburn' quod tenet de domino rege in capite.

De Agatha Trussebut xl.s. de uno feodo in Meuton' quod tenet ut supra.


[1] Read Gyppehall, possibly Gipple in Syston.
[2] Read Roberto.

1004 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.498-502 - cont.

De Willelmo de Ros lx.s. de uno feodo et dimidio in Paunton' et Tyrinton quod tenet de domino rege.

De Hugone Paynel xl.s. de uno feodo in Rasne quod tenet de domino rege.

De Simone de Crevequor xl.s. de uno feodo quod tenet de Alexandre de Nevill' in Wyvelingham, et idem Alexander de domino rege.

De abbate de Valle Dei xxx.s. de tribus partibus unius feodi in Welleby.

Memorandum quod isti subscripti tulerunt breve domini regis de scutagio suo habendo in comitatu Lincolnie:-

Venerabilis pater W. Eboracensis archiepiscopus pro scutagio suo habendo.

Walterus Marescallus, comes Penbrochie et Margeria uxor eius super eodem.

Willelmus de Fortibus super eodem.

Oliverus de Eyncurt super eodem.

Petrus de Sabaudia super eodem.

Willelmus de Vescy super eodem.

Gilbertus de Gaunt super eodem.

Robertus de Tateshall' super eodem.

Radulfus de la Haye super eodem.

Willelmus Lungespe super eodem.

Thomas de Greyley de eodem.

Normannus de Arcy de eodem.

Robertus de Everingham de eodem.

Johannes de Baiocis de eodem.

Willelmus de Cantilupo de eodem.

R. comes Pictavie et Cornubie de eodem.

Henricus de Hastinges de eodem.

Johannes de Nevill' de eodem.

Johannes de Baioll' de eodem.

Andreas Luterel de eodem.

Willelmus Bardoll' de eodem.

Gilbertus de Gaunt de eodem.

R. Lincolniensis episcopus de eodem.

Episcopus Dunolmensis de eodem.

Hugo de Nevill' de eodem.

Hugo de Albinaco, comes Arundellie, de eodem.

H de Boun, comes Essexie et Hertfordie, [1] de eodem.

Walterus Karleolensis episcopus de eodem.

II.414-479.

HOYLAUND.

WAPINTACIUM DE KYRKETON'.

Inquisicio facta in wapintacio de Kyrketon' de scutagio domini regis per sacramentum horum subscriptorum, Thome filii Ricardi,


[1] Read Herefordie.

LINCOLN. 1005

II.414-479 - cont.

Elie de Bikir, Willelmi de Oddehili', Gilberti de Cheyle, Hugonis filii Ricardi, Willelmi filii Persone, Warini filii Ranulfi, Johannis filfi Joe', Gilberti de Croft, Galfridi filii Benedicti, Johannis Servientis et Willelmi Bude, qui dicunt supra sacramentum suum quod

Comes Richemundie habet in eodem wapintacio duo feoda militum et ij. partes unius feodi et iij. partes unius feodi et vij. partem unius feodi et xj. partem unius feodi que sunt de honore Richemundie quem Petrus de Sabaudia tenet de domino rege in capite de dono suo.

Wygetoft. Hugo de Wygetoft tenet de honore Richemundie duo feoda militum in capite in [1] Algerkirk', Kyrketon', Bikir, Swyneh' et Wyberton', et debet scutagium, relevium, et wardam ad castrum Richemundie, scilicet per annum xx.s.

Lambertus de Muleton' tenet de eodem Hugone in predictis villis unum feodum militis in capite et debet scutagium, relevium et wardam.

Alexander filius Lamberti tenet de eodem Lamberto iiij. partem unius feodi in Kyrketon', Algerkirk', et debet scutagium, relevium et wardam.

Frampton'. Lambertus de Muleton' tenet de honore Richemundie terciam partem unius feodi in Frampton' et Kirketon' in capite de dicto honore. Unde Margeria que fuit uxor Alani de Muleton', que habet custodiam filii et heredis ipsius Alani de Muleton', tenet terciam partem unius militis, et Robertus de Cubbeldick' tenet de eodem Lamberto viij. partem unius feodi et debet scutagium, relevium et wardam.

Bykir. Warinus de Munchangi tenet de honore Richemundie iij. partem feodi unius militis in Bykir, Donington' et Swynesh', et Brianus filius Alani tenet illam terciam partem de predicto Warino in capite et debet scutagium, relevium et wardam.

Radulfus filius Radulfi tenet de honore Richemundie medietatem unius feodi et xj. partem feodi unius militis in Bikir, Wyketoft, Wyberton' et Quedhaveringe in capite et dat scutagium, relevium et wardam.

Hippetoft. Alexander de Hippetoft tenet de honore Richemundie in eadem iiij. partem feodi unius militis in capite, et dat scutagium et relevium, set non wardam quia feoffatus de novo.

+Warinus+ Engayn, qui tenet terram que fuit Reginaldi de Benigton', tenet vij. partem unius feodi de honore Richemundie in Kirketon', et Willelmus de Kirketon' tenet illam in capite de dicto Warnero et dat scutagium, relevium et wardam.

Gasberkirke. Robertus de Rye tenet in eadem et Surflet, Quedhavering' et Donington' duo feoda militum de episcopo Lincolniensi, et idem episcopus de domino rege in capite, et dat scutagium et relevium.

Idem Robertus tenet in eisdem villis xxij. partem feodi unius militis in [2] Charlone de Wardrobe, et pertinet ad manerium dicti


[1] A name here is erased.
[2] Read de. See Close Rolls, 1237-1242, pp. 299, 367.

1006 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.414-479 - cont.

Charlonis de Brigenhall', et respondet in Richemundia pro toto feodo integro.

Thomas de Crek' tenet de honore Lancastrie unum feodum militis in capite, et Margeria mater ipsius Thome tenet illud de eo nomine dotis, et debet scutagium, relevium et wardam.

Willelmus de Vescy tenet in Bikir nonam partem feodi unius militis de domino rege in capite, et Willelmus le Latimer tenet de eo illam nonam partem in capite et debet scutagium et relevium.

Archiepiscopus Eboracensis tenet in Bikir et. Donington' xvjam partem et xxiiij. partem feodi unius militis de domino rege in capite, que Hugo filius Radulfi tenet de eo in capite, et debet scutagium et relevium.

Donington'. Hugo de Boby tenet in eadem villa dimidiam bovatam terre de Petronilla de Croun in capite et respondet ei in Kesteven.

Petronilla de Croun tenet in eodem wapintacio unum feodum militis et dimidium de domino rege in capite, et iij. partem unius feodi que Rogerus de Huntingfeld' de ea tenet in capite, de quibus idem Rogerus tenet terciam partem unius feodi in dominico suo in Frampton', et Ricardus Mareward' tenet de eodem Rogero unum feodum militis in Wyberton, et Thomas de Huntingfeld' tenet de eodem Rogero iiijtam partem feodi unius militis in Bikir, Donington' et Swinesh', et Willelmus de Kirketon' tenet de eodem Rogero in capite iiijtam partem feodi unius militis in Kirketon', et debent scutagium et relevium.

Surflet et Gasberkirke. Comes Richemundie tenet in eisdem villis xviij. bovatas terre quas liberi tenentes in socagio de eo tenent in capite, et reddunt inde per annum xlv.s. vij.d. quadrantem et nichil aliud.

Rogerus de Cressy tenet xxx. bovatas terre in Surflet in capite de domino rege et reddit inde per annum pro omnibus xl.s.

Quedhavering' et Donington'. Comes Richemundie tenet in eisdem villis xvij. bovatas terre quas liberi tenentes de eo tenent et reddunt inde per annum xlij.s. vij.d.

Idem comes habet in eisdem villis tres carucatas terre in dominico.

Abbas de Burgo habet in eisdem villis iij. carucatas terre et in Gasberkirk' in elemosina de dono comitis.

Abbates de Swynesheved', Neubo et de Craston' unam bovatam in elemosina in Donington'.

Abbas de Oselveston' j. bovatam terre et dimidiam in elemosian de dono Roberti Grumbald'.

Bikir. Comes Richemundie tenet in eadem xx. bovatas terre quas liberi tenentes tenent de eo in capite et reddunt inde per annum l.s. j.d. et quadrantera pro omnibus.

Lambertus de Quappelade tenet in eadem villa et Swynesh' xvj. bovatas terre et reddit inde domino Lamberto de Muleton' xx.s. redditus pro omnibus, et sunt de feodo militis quod Lambertus de Muleton' tenet de Hugone de Wygetoft.

Abbas de Oselveston' habet ibidem unam bovatam et dimidiam in elemosina de dono Roberti Grumbald'.

LINCOLN. 1007

II.414-479 - cont.

Wyketoft et Swinesheved. Comes Richemundie tenet in eisdem villis vj. carucatas terre et vij. bovatas, de quibus fiberi tenentes tenent in sokagio iij. carucatas et vij. bovatas et reddunt inde per annum lxxvij.s. viij.d. pro omnibus, et liberi tenentes eiusdem comitis tenent inde unam carucatam terre scificet de manerio suo de Wykes, et villani sui tenent ij. carucatas terre de eodem manerio.

Abbas de Croyland unam carucatam in elemosina de dono dicti comitis.

Suterton'. Comes Richemundie tenet in eadem villa v. carucatas terre et dimidiam quas fiberi tenentes tenent de eo et reddunt inde per annum cx.s. ij.d. iij. quadrantes pro omnibus.

Lambertus de Muleton' habet ibidem x. bovatas et dimidiam quas tenet de abbate de Langenet, et abbas tenet illas in elemosina de feodo comitis.

Abbas de Croyland tenet ij. carucatas terre in elemosina de dono comitis.

Algerkirk'. Comes Richemundie tenet in eadem villa vj. carucatas terre et vij. bovatas quas liberi tenentes tenent de eo et reddunt inde per annum vj.l. xvij.s. viij.d. quadrantem pro omnibus.

Abbas de Croyland tenet ix. bovatas terre in elemosina de dono comitis.

Kirketon'. Comes Richemundie tenet in eadem villa xv. carucatas terre et tres bovatas et dimidiam quas liberi tenentes tenent et reddunt inde per annum xv.l. ix.s. v.d. pro omnibus.

Frampton'. Comes Richemundie tenet in eadem villa v. carucatas terre et dimidiam, de quibus liberi tenentes tenent in socagio j. carucatam terre et dimidiam, et reddunt inde per annum xxx.s. iij. quadrantes pro omnibus, et alii liberi tenentes tenent de manerio suo de Frampton' vj. bovatas, et comes tenent in dominico iij. carucatas et ij. bovatas.

Wyberton'. Comes Richemundie tenet in eadem villa vij. carucatas terre et ij. bovatas et dimidiam quas liberi tenentes tenent et reddunt inde per annum vij.l. vj.s. j.d. quadrantem pro omnibus.

Radulfus filius Radulfi tenet ibidem dimidiam carucatam terre de eodem comite, et reddit inde per annum iiij.s. pro omnibus.

Hugo le Bretun et participes sui tenent ibidem dimidiam carucatam terre de feodo comitis, set nichil reddunt.

Heres Radulfi de Fenne habet ibidem v. bovatas terre et dimidium maneslot de comite Richemundie, et respondet in Kirketon' wapintacio.

HOYLAUND.

WAPINTACIUM DE ELHOU.

Inquisicio facta in wapentacio de Elhou per sacramentum horum subscriptorum, scilicet Lamberti de Quappelage, Roberti de Ory, Algeri de Hulmo, Johannis de Fulne, Willelmi filii Hugonis de Spalding', Prioris Cluny, Ranulphi de Blakewell, Alexandri Clerici de Quappelad', Galfridi filii Eduse, Willelmi le Clerk' et Willelmi filii Galfridi de Sutton', [1] qui dicunt super sacramentum suum quod


[1] This list of jurors must be imperfect.

1008 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.414-479 - cont.

Pincebec. In Pincebec sunt xij. carucate terre de quibus prior de Spalding' et tenentes de eodem tenent viij. carucatas et quinque bovatas et dimidiam, quas idem prior tenet de dono Lucie comitisse de Bolingbroc in puram elemosinam de honore de Bolingbroc.

Item Thomas de Pincebec tenet ibidem et tenentes de eo ij. carucatas terre quas idem Thomas tenet de Rogero de Huntingfeld' pro feodo unius militis, et est de honore de Croum.

Item abbas de Croyland et tenentes de eodem tenent ibidem dimidiam carucatam terre de dono Wydonis de Croum in pura elemosina.

Spalding'. In villa de Spalding' sunt xij. carucate terre de quibus prior de Spalding' et tenentes de eodem tenent viij. carucatas terre et quinque bovatas, quas idem prior tenet in puram elemosinam de dono Lucie comitisse de Bolingbroc.

Item abbas Sancti Nicholai Andagavensis et tenentes de eodem tenent ibidem unam carucatam terre et tres bovatas de dono Wydonis de Croum in pura elemosina.

Item abbas de Croyland et tenentes de eodem tenent ibidem duas carucatas de dono Wydonis de Croum in puram elemosinam.

Weston'. In Weston' sunt vj. carucate terre de quibus Lambertus de Moleton' et tenentes de eodem tenent unam carucatam quam idem Lambertus tenet de Rogero de Huntingfeld' per servicium trium parcium unius militis pro dicta terra et pro iiij. bovatis terre in Sutton', et est de honore de Croum.

Item prior de Spalding' et tenentes de eodem tenent ibidem v. carucatas quas prior tenet de dono Lucie comitisse de Bolingbroc in puram elemosinam.

Moleton'. In Moleton' sunt vj. carucate terre, de quibus Lambertus de Moleton' et tenentes de eo tenent tres carucatas et dimidiam de abbate de Angeris', et est de honore de Bolingbroc, et idem abbas in puram elemosinam de dicto honore de dono Lucie comitisse de Bolingbrok'.

Item prior de Spalding' et tenentes de eodem tenent ibidem duas carucatas terre et dimidiam in puram elemosinam de dono predicte Lucie et de predicto honore.

Quappelad' et Holebeck'. In Quappelad' et Holebech' sunt xviij. carucate terre, de quibus Robertus Doyry et tenentes de eodem tenent tres carucatas terre et quinque bovatas quas idem Robertus tenet de Egidio de Consul pro xxma parte feodi unius militis, et idem Egidius de comite Albemarlie.

Item Willelmus de Bello Monte et Egidius et tenentes de eisdem tenent duas carucatas terre et tres bovatas in Holebech' et Quappelade de honore Aubemarlie.

Item Willelmus le Angewyn tenet in dictis villis duas carucatas et duas bovatas de Petronilla de Croum pro servicio unius militis, de quibus Lambertus de Quappelad' tenet unam carucatam terre de predicto Willelmo pro servicio feodi dimidii militis.

Item Thomas de Moleton', dominus de Holebech', et tenentes de eo tenent ibidem vj. carucatas terre de Lamberto de Moleton' per servicium unius militis, et dictus Lambertus de comite Herefordie

LINCOLN. 1009

II.414-479 - cont.

per idem servicium, et idem comes de honore Richemundie, et de dictis vj. carucatis terre heres Rogeri Bacun tenet unam carucatam de predicto Thoma per servicium vj. partis unius militis de predicto honore.

Item abbas de Croyland et tenentes de eodem iij. carucatas terre et vj. bovatas in pura elemosina de domino rege.

Flet. In Flet sunt vj. carucate terre quas Lambertus de Moleton' et tenentes de eo tenent de Henrico de Munden' per servicium ij. parcium feodi unius militis et de honore de Lancastrie.

Geden'. In Geden' sunt viij. carucate terre quas Willelmus de Bello Monte, Willelmus Constabularius. et Egidius de Gousul, heredes de Geden', tenent de comite Aubemarlie per servicium iiijte partis unius militis pro dictis viij. carucatis et pro vj. carucatis in Holebech' et Quappelade quas tenent de comite Aubemarlie, et comes de domino rege.

Lutton'. In Lutton' sunt quatuor carucate terre quas Lambertus de Moleton' tenet de Rogero de Maresey per servicium unius militis, et idem Rogerus de honore de Lancastrie.

Sutton'. In Sutton' sunt ix. carucate et vj. bovate, de quibus Willelmus Lungespee tenet vij. carucatas de Henrico de Munden' et idem Henricus de honore Lancastrie.

Item prior de Spauding' et homines sui tenent ibidem duas carucatas terre et duas bovatas in puram elemosinam.

Item Lambertus de Moleton' et homines sui tenent ibidem iiij. bovatas terre de Rogero de Huntingfeud sub scutagio suo in Weston' de honore de Croum.

Tyd. In Tyd sunt due carucate terre et due bovate, de quibus Hugo de Ros et tenentes de eodem tenent unam carucatam et unam bovatam de Henrico de Munden' per servicium dimidii feodi militis, et idem Hugo de honore Lancastrie.

Item Reginaldus de Tyd tenet ibidem unam carucatam et unam bovatam de dicto Henrico per idem servicium, et idem Henricus de honore Lancastrie ut supra.

WAPINTACIUM DE SCIRBEC.

INQUISICIO FACTA IN HOYLAND' DE FEODIS MILITUM.

Inquisicio facta in wapintacio de Scyrbec per sacramentum horum subscriptorum, scilicet Willelmi de Bupe, Johannis de Farceus, Thome Gernun, Thome Bloutheved, Andree filii Walteri, Radulfi de Sereyng', Jacobi de Pysly, Roberti filii Eudonis, Alani de Butterwyck', Alani filii Henrici de Leka, Magni filii Turgot' et Simonis filii Magni, qui dicunt super sacramentum suum quod comes Richemundie et Petronilla de Croum tenent capitales honores in dicto wapintacio de domino rege, et dicunt quod.

Wrangel. Comes Marescallus tenet tria quarteria feodi unius militis in villa de Wrangel et Leke de comite Richemundie per servicium unius militis.

Leverton'. Thomas Caron, Thomas de Riggesby. Laurencius filius Jocelini, Walterus filius Simonis tenent xl. partem unius feodi

1010 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.414-479 - cont.

militis de honore comitis Richemundie per servicium militare, et idem comes de domino rege in capite in Leverton'.

Benigton'. Radulfus de Fenna tenet in Benigton' ij. carucatas terre de Johanne de Edelington', et idem Johannes de honore Richemundie pro iiijta parte feodi unius militis.

Item +Warinus+ Engayne tenet ibidem unum feodum militis de eodem honore in Leke, Wrangel et Leverton'.

Item idem Warinus et Radulfus de Quappelad' tenent ibidem vij. partem unius militis de Radulfo de Fenna, et idem Radulfus de dicto honore.

Item Simon filius Johannis et Alanus de Seldic tenent ibidem xvj. partem unius militis de Lamberto de Moleton', et ipse Lambertus de dicto honore, et comes Richemundie de domino rege in capite.

Toft. Radulfus de Fenna tenet in Toft iiij. partem unius militis de Petronilla de Croum, et ipsa de honore Richemundie.

Item idem Radulfus tenet in eadem et in wapentakio de Kyrketon' xam partem feodi unius militis de dicto honore ut supra.

Item Johannes de Edelington' tenet xvj. partem feodi unius militis in eadem de dicto honore ut supra.

Scyrbec. Lambertus de Moleton' tenet in Scyrbec duas partes feodi unius militis de honore Richemundie per servicium militare.

Item abbas de Eboraco tenet ibidem in pura elemosina de dicto honore xij. bovatas terre.

Sanctus Botulphus. Comes Richemundie tenet totam villam de Sancto Botulpho ex parte orientali aque de domino rege in capite, excepta xijma parte quam abbas de Eboraco tenet in elemosina de dicto honore, set nescitur pro quanto.

Leke. Comes Britannie tenet in villa de Lek' decem carucatas terre, et in villa de Leverton' quinque carucatas terre, in Benigton' ij. carucatas, in Scyrebec ij. carucatas et dimidiam, quas liberi sui de eo tenent in socagio per liberum servicium.

Wrangel. Comes Marescallus tenet in Wrangel xviij. bovatas terre de abbate de Wautham per servicium xx.s. per annum, et idem abbas de honore de Croum.

Buterwyc et Freston'. Alexander de Poynton' tenet ibidem iiij. partem unius militis de Petronilla de Croum, et ipsa de domino rege in capite.

Item Alanus de Buterwyc tenet ibidem xam partem militis de eadem Petronilla, et ipsa ut supra.

Item Rogerus filius Adelard' tenet ibidem xl. partem feodi unius militis ut supra.

Item Alanus de Hippetoft tenet ibidem viij. partem militis de eadem. et ipsa ut supra.

Item Johannes de Farcell' tenet ibidem et in Sancto Botulpho et de eadem vtam partem unius militis, et ipsa ut supra.

Item Johannes de Edeling tenet ibidem et de eadem unum feodum militis, et ipsa ut supra.

Item Willelmus de Rupe tenet ibidem et de eadem j. feodum militis, et ipsa ut supra.

LINCOLN. 1011

II.414-479 - cont.

Item Thomas de Pincebec tenet ibidem et de eadem unum feodum militis, et ipsa ut supra.

Toft. Rogerus de Huntingfeld' tenet in Toft una cum duabus carucatis terre in wapintacio de Kyrketon' unum feodum militis de honore de Croum, de quo Rogero Radulfus de Fenna tenet xj. partem unius militis in eadem villa.

Item Warnerus Engayne de eodem et de eodem honore xj. partem unius militis.

Alanus de Hippetoft de eodem et de eodem honore iiijtam partem feodi unius militis.

Johannes de Huntingfeud decimam partem feodi unius militis de eodem et de eodem honore.

Johannes de Tointon' xj. partem feodi unius militis de eodem et de eodem honore, et domina de Croum de domino rege in capite.

Sanctus Botulphus. Alanus de Dauby tenet ex occidentali parte aque in Sancto Botullo xxj. partem feodi unius militis de honore de Croum.

Item Robertus de Thatishal' tenet ibidem xxj. partem feodi unius militis de Lamberto de Moleton', set nescitur de quo honore idem Lambertus tenet.

Item Radulfus de Fenna tenet j. carucatam terre de honore Richemundie per servicium xx.s. ob. per annum.

Inquisicio facta de scutagio domini regis in Nortr', scilicet quot feoda teneantur tam de domino rege in capite quam de aliis qui tenent de domino rege et tam de veteri feoffamento quam de novo, per sacramentum proborum et legalium tam militum quam aliorum scilicet xij. in singulis wapentaciis.

WAPENTACIUM DE JERDEBURG'.

Inquisicio facta in wapentacio de Jerdeburg' per sacramentum horum subscriptorum, scilicet Roberti Martel, Hugonis de Ulseby, Roberti Nunman, Nicholai de Roxton', Roberti filii Baldewini, Benedicti filii Benedicti de Barwe, Galfridi de Roxton', Ivonis de Wytham, Willelmi Berner, Simonis de Sarnes, Alani Frankelayn, Walteri Makerel, et Laurencii de Pratis, qui dicunt super sacramentum suum quod.

Barton'. Radulfus de Sicca Villa tenet in Barton' unum feodum militis de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Robertus de Thatishal' tenet in eadem v. partem feodi unius militis de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Henricus de Nunchamp' [1] tenet ibidem quartam partem feodi unius militis de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Robertus de Wyleby tenet in eadem viij. partem unius militis de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.


[1] Sc. Lunchamp.

1012 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.414-479 - cont.

Item Philippus de Burton' tenet ibidem viij. partem feodi unius militis de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus ut supra.

Item constabularius Cestrie tenet ibidem xxam partem feodi unius militis de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus ut supra.

Feriby. Prior de Thornholm tenet in Feriby dimidium feodum unius militis de Johanna Wake, et eadem Johanna de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Hugo filius Radulfi tenet dimidium feodum militis de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Horkestowe. Magister Hospitalis de Ierosolyme tenet in Horkestowe unum feodum militis de Willelmo de Ameford', et idem Willelmus de Ricardo de Percy, et idem Ricardus de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege in capite ut supra.

Wulrikeby. Robertus de Theleby tenet in Wlrikeby duas partes feodi unius militis de constabulario Cestrie, et idem constabularius de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Robertus de Arcy tenet ibidem v. partem feodi unius militis de Willelmo de Wyum, et idem Willelmus de episcopo Lincolniensi, et ipse de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Adam de Huke tenet in eadem vij. partem1 dimidii militis de Willelmo de Wyum, et Willelmus de episcopo Lincolniensi, et idem episcopus de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Ricardus Crisping tenet ibidem iiij. partem feodi unius militis de Willelmo de Dyve, et idem Willelmus de episcopo Lincolniensi. et episcopus de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus de Alneto tenet ibidem xij. partem feodi unius militis de comite Leycestrie, et comes de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Ellisham. Willelmus de Lassell' tenet in Ellisham terciam partem feodi unius militis de constabulario Cestrie, et constabularius de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Robertus de Munceaus tenet ibidem terciam partem feodi unius militis de Simone de Kyme, et idem Simon de Willelmo de Dyve, et idem Willelmus de episcopo Lincolniensi, et episcopus de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus le Bretun tenet ibidem iiij. partem unius militis de Amorey le Butyler, et idem Amorey de comite Cestrie, et comes de domino rege in cariite de conquestu.

Wragby. Gilbertus de Arcubus tenet in Ellisham, Wragby et Ketelby feoda duorum militum de Roberto de Everhingham, et idem Robertus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Willelmus de Alneto, Walterus de Pertenay et domina de Drayna tenent in Ellisham, Wraby et Kettelby feoda ij. militum de domino Bardulfo, et idem Bardulfus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Thorp et Ketelby. Walterus de Kyllingholm tenet in Thorp viij. partem feodi unius militis de Johanna Wake, et eadem Johanna de domino rege in capite de conquestu.


[1] Probably an error for partes, as on p. 1075.

LINCOLN. 1013

II.414-479 - cont.

Item Willelmus de Thorp tenet ibidem viij. partem feodi unius militis de Johanna Wake. et ipsa ut supra.

Meleton' et Ulseby. Agatha Trussebut tenet in Meleton' et Ulseby et in Brunhum unum feodum militis in capite de domino rege.

Item Petrus de Nevill' tenet ibidem dimidium feodum unius militis de Philippo de Nevill', et idem Phihppus de Normanno de Arcy, et idem Normannus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Hugo de Ulseby tenet ibidem iiij. partem militis de Roberto de Nevill', et idem Robertus de episcopo Lincolniensi, et episcopus de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Thomas Escam' [1] tenet ibidem xam partem feodi unius militis de comite Salisburie, et idem comes de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Berneteby. Robertus de Cestr' et Amia de Rydeford tenent in Berneteby duo feoda militum de constabulario Cestrie, et idem constabularius de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Johannes de Funteney tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis de Thoma Greyley, et idem Thomas de constabulario Cestrie, et constabularius de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Robertus de Burton' tenet ibidem iiij. partem unius militis de Thoma de Greyley, et Thomas de constabulario Cestrie, et constabularius de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Robertus de Cestr' tenet ibidem xam partem unius militis de eodem constabulario, et ipse constabularius ut supra.

Item Johannes filius Benedicti tenet ibidem xxam partem unius militis de Hugone de Nevill', et Hugo de constabulario Cestrie, et idem constabularius ut supra.

Sumeretby. Thomas de Arches tenet in Sumeretby dimidium feodum unius militis de Willelmo de Percy, et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Idem Thomas tenet ibidem xxam partem unius militis de Johanne de Funteney, et idem Johannes de Thoma de Greyley, et idem Thomas de constabulario Cestrie, et constabularius de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Bekeby. Gilbertus de Arches tenet in Bekeby dimidium feodum militis de Thoma Greyley, et idem Thomas de constabulario Cestrie, et constabularius de domino rege ut supra.

Item Hugo de Nevill' tenet ibidem unum feodum militis de Roberto de Nevill', et idem Robertus de episcopo Lincolniensi, et episcopus de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Seuerby. Ingeram de Seuerby tenet in Seuerby unum feodum militis et dimidium cle comite Aubemarlie, et comes de rege in capite de conquestu.

Kadeney. Galfridus de Nevill' tenet ibidem unam carucatam et dat ad wardam ad Dovere xxx.s. et non dat scutagium.

Husum. Item Johannes filius Benedicti tenet in Husum vj. partem feodi unius militis de Simone de Hundon', et idem Simon


[1] Read Escavin.

1014 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.414-479 - cont.

de Henrico de Muleden', et idem Henricus de domino rege in capite de honore Lancastrie de veteri feoffamento.

Kellesay. Galfridus de Nevill' tenet ibidem unum feodum militis de Petro de Sabadia de honore Richemundie, et idem Petrus de domino rege in capite.

Broclousby. Robertus de Amford' tenet in Broclousby unum feodum militis de Simone de Kyme, et idem Simon de episcopo Dureham', et episcopus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus filius Simonis tenet in eadem dimidium feodum unius militis de comite Cestrie, et comes de rege in capite.

Hundon'. Simon de Hundon' tenet in eadem unum feodum militis de Johanne de Hyreby, et idem Johannes de1 Nevill forestario, et idem Johannes de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Netelton'. Willelmus Blaunchard tenet in Nettilton', Slysby [2] et Houton' dimidium feodum militis de honore Lancastrie de Henrico de Muneden', et idem Henricus de domino rege de conquestu.

Item Alanus de Rowell' tenet ibidem dimidium feodum unius militis de Johanne de Hautenby, et idem Johannes de Johanne'de Nevill', et idem Johannes de domino rege de conquestu.

Herdwic, Wycham. Johannes de Aun [3] tenet in [4] Wycham duas partes feodi unius militis de Johanne de Nevill' forestario, et idem Johannes de domino rege de conquestu.

Faldingburg'. [5] Normannus de Arcy tenet in Faldingburg' [5] ij. carucatas terre de baronia sua in capite de domino rege, set nescitur pro quantis feodis.

Item Galfridus de Castelun' tenet ibidem iiij. partem feodi j. militis de Thoma de Riggeby, et idem Thomas de archiepiscopo Eboracensi, et archiepiscopus de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Charneles tenet ibidem ifij. partem feodi unius militis de Roysia de Verdon', et Roysia in capite de domino rege.

Barwe. Colinus de Quatremar' tenet in Barwe dimidium feodum militis de Jolianne filio Galfridi, et idem Johannes de Willelmo de Dyve, et idem Willelmus de comite Albemarfie, et comes de domino rege de conquestu.

Item Thurstanus Dispensator tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis de Willelmo de Dyve, et Willelmus de comite Albemarlie, et comes de domino rege ut supra.

Item Walterus Crispin tenet ibidem unum feodum militis de Radulfo de Gousul, et idem Radulfus de Johanne [6] Baiocis, et Johannes de domino rege de conquestu.

Aburg'. Hugo Berner tenet in Aburg' et Killngholm unum feodum militis de Normanno de Arcy, et idem Normannus de domino rege de conquestu.

Croxton'. Gilbertus filius Andree tenet in Croxton' iiij. partem feodi unius militis' de Willelmo de Dyve, et idem Willelmus de


[1] Supply Johanne de.
[2] Read Clysby.
[3] Read Oudneby or Owenby.
[4] Supply Herdwic et.
[5] Read Stallingburg.
[6] Supply de.

LINCOLN. 1016

II.414-479 - cont.

episcopo Lincolniensi, et episcopus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Johannes de Selford' tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis et viij. partem feodi unius militis de comite Wintonie, et comes in capite de domino rege de conquestu.

Item Ricardus filius Roberti tenet ibidem dimidium feodum unius militis de honore Lancastrie.

Kyrington'. Prior de Thornholm tenet in Kyrington' unum feodum militis de Galfrido de Nevill', et idem Galfridus de Petro de Sabaudia de honore Richemundie, et idem Petrus de domino rege.

Item Ernisius de Nevill' et Johannes de Funteney tenent ibidem xij. partem unius militis de Willelmo de Lassell', et idem Willelmus de comite de Albemarlie, et comes de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Hymingham. Simon de Kyme tenet in eadem dimidium feodum de Ricardo de Percy, et idem Ricardus de domino rege de conquestu.

Item Nicholaus de eadem tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis de Normanno de Arcy. et idem Normannus de domino rege de conquestu.

Kilingholm. [1] Comes Marescallus tenet ibidem et in Aburg' duo feoda militum de honore de Bolingbroc de domino rege de conquestu.

Item Walterus de Kylingholm tenet in Kilingholm et Seuerby unum feodum militis de Pygot de Lassell', et Pygot de Lamberto de Moleton', et idem [2] Petro de Sabadia de honore Richemundie.

Item Ingeram de Muncell' tenet in eadem xlviii. partem j. militis de comite Aubemarlie, et [3] de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Rogerus de Cotingham et Willelmus Berner tenent ibidem dimidium feodum militis de Roberto de Cestr' et Anna de Rydeford, et idem Robertus et Amia de comite Marescallo, et comes de domino rege de conquestu de honore de Gretham.

Item Radulfus de Consul tenet ibidem terciam partem j. militis de comitissa Cestrie, et comitissa de comite Marescallo, et idem comes de domino rege in capite de honore de Bolingbroc.

Item Ricardus de Fontibus tenet in Kilingholm unum feodum militis de Normanno de Arcy. et idem Normannus de rege de conquestu.

Roxton'. Galfridus de Roxton' tenet in Roxton' dimidium feodum militis de Ricardo de Percy, et idem Ricardus de domino rege de conquestu.

Item Radulfus de Consul tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis de Ricardo de Percy, et idem Ricardus de domino rege de conquestu.

Keleby. Walterus de Keleby tenet in Keleby unum feodum militis de Normanno de Arcy, et idem Normannus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Thomas Burdun tenet ibidem dimidium feodum unius militis de Roberto de Nevill', et idem de episcopo Lincolniensi, et episcopus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.


[1] Misplaced in II.427.
[2] Supply Lambertus de.
[3] Supply comes.

1016 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.414-479 - cont.

Item Stephanus de Keleby tenet ibidem* *de Willelmo de Bussey; et idem Willelmus de comite Marescallo, et comes de domino rege de conquestu de honore de Bolingbroc.

Item idem Stephanus tenet ibidem sextam partem feodi unius militis de Willelmo filio Walteri de Belysby, et idem Willelmus de episcopo Lincolniensi, et episcopus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Wyton'. Johannes Escam' [1] tenet in Wyton' duo feoda militum de Willelmo de Ros, et idem Willelmus de Willelmo de Vescy, et idem Willelmus de Willelmo de Mortimer, et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Simon de Ver tenet in eadem et in Gousul j. feodum militis de episcopo Lincolniensi, et episcopus Lincolniensis in capite de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Normannus de Nevill' tenet in eadem et in Parva Lumberge unum feodum militis de Normanno de Arcy, et idem Normannus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Willelmus filius Willelmi de Hakeford' tenet in Wyton' et in Brunhum unum feodum militis de Agatha Trussebut, et Agatha de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Goushul. Radulfus de Gousul tenet in eadem feodum j. militis de Johanne de Baiocis, et Johannes in capite de domino rege de conquestu.

Item Hugo de Nevill' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de Willelmo de Ros, et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite ut supra.

Item Simon de Ver tenet in Gousul duas oarucatas terre et dimidiam, unde xlviij. carucate faciunt unum feodum militis, de comite de Albemarlia, et comes de domino rege in capite ut supra.

Kyrington'. Item Hugo de Nevill' tenet xx. libratas terre in Kyrington' et Aburg' de domino rege in capite pro uno feodo de veteri feoffamento.

Saxeby, Bondeby. Ricardus de Grey et Matillis de Serland' et Galfridus Costentin tenent totam villam de Saxeby, Bondeby de Willelmo de Solers pro servicio suo ad transfretandum cum eo ad custum suum in Normanniam per xl. dies, et Willelmus de Solers tenet de domino rege in capite de constel' [2] Normannie pro quadam alba virga portanda coram ipso die Natali Domini piro omni servicio de conquestu.

WAPENTACIUM DE WALSCROFT.

Inquisicio facta in wapentacio de Walscroft per sacramentum horum subscriptorum, scilicet Radulfi de Normanneby. Alani de Braybof, Roberti filii Willelmi de Teuelby, Walteri filii Germani, Hugonis filii Roberti, Thome filii Willelmi de Rasne, Ranulfi de Hotham, Hugonis de Benigwurth', Henrici de Pelham, Gilberti filii Radulfi, Walteri de Kareby et Hugonis Prilli, qui dicunt super sacramentum suum quod.


[1] Read Escavin.
[2] Read constabularia.

LINCOLN. 1017

II.414-479 - cont.

Toft, Neuton'. Radulfus Arsik tenet in Toft et Neuton', Ouresby, Glentham, Glentwurth' feodum unius militis de Johanna Arsicke pro uno osturco quando dictus Radulfus vel heredes sui debent relevare terram suam, et Johanna tenet feodum illud de honore de Dovere.

Item Willelmus de Wendovere tenet in dictis villis decimam partem feodi unius militis de Alexandre de Nevill', et idem Alexander de comite Albemarfie, et comes de domino rege de conquestu.

Item Radulfus Alan' tenet in Neuton' xxam partem feodi unius militis de Hugone Berner, et Hugo de Roberto de Nevill', et idem Robertus de Henrico Camerario, et idem Henricus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Radulfus filius Warini tenet in Neuton' dimidium feodum militis de Jollano de Nevill', et Jollanus de constabulario Cestrie, et constabularius de domino rege de conquestu.

West Rasne. Juliana de Rasne tenet in eadem duas partes feodi unius militis de Roberto de Welle, et Robertus de Hugone Paynei, et idem Hugo in capite de domino rege de conquestu.

Media Rasne. Ingeram Paynei tenet dimidium feodum militis de Thoma de Scoteny, et Thomas de Hugone Paynei, et Hugo in capite de domino rege de conquestu.

Item Robertus de Nevill' tenet ibidem tres partes feodi unius militis de honore de Dovere.

Est Rasne. Gracia de Insula tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis de honore de Lancastria.

Lindwoude. Johannes de Baiocis tenet in Lindwoude, set nescitur pro quanto nec per quod servicium.

Item Willelmus de Baiocis tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de Johanne de Auneby, et idem Johannes de Johanne de Nevill' forestario, et idem Johannes de baronia Wrarini filii Geroud, et Warinus in capite de domino rege de conquestu.

Wylingham. Prior de Sixele tenet in eadem unum feodum militis de Simone de Creuquer, et Simon de Alexandre de Nevill', et Alexander de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Teuilby. Henricus de Plaiz, Ricardus de Curcy et Robertus de Baiocis tenent in Teuelby unum feodum militis de Andrea Luterel, et Andreas de domino rege de conquestu.

Item Gilbertus de Homes tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis de Jollano de Nevill', et Jollanus de honore de Richemundia.

Riseby. Eufemia de Sancto Licio tenet in Ryseby unam carucatam terre unde xlviij. carucate faciunt unum feodum militis.

Walesby. Walterus filius Willelmi tenet in Walesby et Willelmus de Belesby terciam partem et octavam partem feodi unius militis de Willelmo Hardredishul, et idem Willelmus de Philippo de Chauncy, et idem Philippus de comite Britannie, et comes de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Jollanus de Nevill' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum de honore Lancastrie.

Otteby. Willelmus de Otteby tenet in eadem unum feodum militis de honore de Bolingbroc.

1018 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.414-479 - cont.

Item Robertus le Rat tenet ibidem unum feodum militis de Philippo de Millay, et Philippus de feodo Willelmi de Scoteny, et Philippus [1] de domino rege de conquestu.

Claxeby et Normaneby. Alanus de Braybof tenet in Claxeby et Normaneby et Osgoteby tria feoda militum de Henrico de Braybof de Basingkestok', et Henricus de honore de Bolingbroc.

Item Radulfus de Normaneby tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis de Willelmo de Otteby, et Willelmus de honore de Bolingbroc.

Item Robertus le Curteys tenet in Normaneby iiij. partem feodi unius militis de Alano de Braybof, et Alanus de Johanne de Auneby, et idem Johannes de Johanne de Nevill' forestario, et Johannes de domino rege in capite de baronia que fuit Warini filii Geroud.

Item Johannes de Claxeby tenet in eadem centesimam partem feodi unius militis de comite Aubemarlie, et comes de rege in capite de conquestu.

Kynerby. Willelmus de Dyve tenet in eadem et in Ouresby et Osgoteby v. partes feodi unius militis de episcopo Lincolniensi, et episcopus de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Ouresby. Adam Prilli tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de Normanno de Arcy, et idem Normannus de domino rege de conquestu.

Houton'. Johannes de Aysterby tenet in eadem unum feodum militis de Galfrido de Benigwurth', et idem Galfridus de honore de Bofingbroc.

Sutkelesey. Johannes Hansard tenet in eadem et in Thorinton' unum feodum militis de Henrico de Munden', et idem Henricus de honore Lancastrie.

Item Johannes de Torneton' et Radulfus le Paumer tenent in eadem ix. partem feodi unius militis de honore Lancastrie.

Item Johannes de Aysterby tenet in Torinton' vj. partem feodi unius militis de Henrico de Munden', et Henricus de honore Lancastrie.

Thoriswey. Johannes de Baiocis tenet in Thoriswey dimidium feodum militis de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Eufemia de Sancto Licio tenet ibidem duas partes feodi unius militis de Johanne de Baiocis, et Johannes de domino rege ut supra.

Item Robertus Bretun et Thomas de Lissington' tenent in eadem iiij. partem feodi unius militis de honore de Bolingbroc.

Item Johannes de Insula tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de Johanne de Baiocis, et Johannes de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Hugo de Baiocis tenet in eadem xxam partem feodi unius militis de dicto Johanne, et idem Johannes de domino rege ut supra.

Item Ace de Styveton' tenet ibidem xl. partem feodi unius militis de dicto Johanne, et idem Johannes de domino rege ut supra.

Croxeby. Alanus de Behsby tenet in Croxeby tres partes feodi unius militis de honore de Bolingbroc.


[1] Read Willelmus.

LINCOLN. 1019

II.414-479 - cont.

Item Alicia de Freshen' tenet fiij. partem feodi unius militis de Johanne [1] forestario, et idem Johannes de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Walterus de Steynton' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum unius militis de Willelmo de Albinaco, et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Gerardus filius Walteri tenet dimidium feodum militis de Normanno de Arcy, et idem Normannus de domino rege ut supra.

Thurgramby. Item Hugo de Benigwurth' tenet in Thurgramby dimidium feodum militis de honore de Bolingbroc.

Item Ingeram de Santon' tenet in eadem xj. bovatas terre, unde xl. bovate faciunt feodum unius militis, de comite Albemarlie, et comes de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Johanna de Landa tenet in eadem feoda duorum militum de Normanno de Arcy, et idem Normannus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item eadem Johanna tenet in eadem dimidiam carucatam terre, unde xlviij. carucatas faciunt feodum unius militis, de Normanno de Arcy, et ipse Normannus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Binnebroc. Stephanus de Gaunt tenet in Binnebroc et Ricardus de Uffinton' iij. partes feodi unius militis de honore de Beuver, et dominus de Beuver de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Steynton'. Thomas de Scoteny tenet in eadem iiij. partem feodi unius militis in capite de domino rege de conquestu.

Item Willelmus de Alneto tenet in eadem sextam partem feodi unius militis de honore de Lancastria.

Item Ricardus de Murers tenet ibidem vj. partem feodi unius militis de Ricardo de Percy, et idem Ricardus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

WAPENTACIUM DE BRADELE.

Inquisicio facta in wapentacio de Bradele per sacramentum horum subscriptorum, scilicet Jollani de Helinge, Ernisii de Cotes, Johannis de Auneby, Radulfi de Trehampton', Willelmi de Funteny, Ricardi de Hoi, Walteri filii Willelmi de Cotes, Walteri filii Normanni, Henrici filii Jocelini, Ricardi de Houton', Galfridi le Mecur, Thome filii Henrici de Humbersteyn, qui dicunt super sacramentum suum quod.

Swalewe. Thomas de Lascell' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de Rogero de Lascell', et idem Rogerus de comite Britannie, et comes in capite de domino rege de honore Richemundie.

Item priorissa de Appeltun tenet in eadem xam partem feodi unius militis de feodo Gilberti de Munceus, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege in capite.

Item abbas de Grimisby tenet in Swalewe viij. partem feodi j. militis de honore Lancastrie.

Item prior de Cotun tenet ibidem nonam et decimam partem feodi unius militis de honore Lancastrie.


[1] After Johanne, supply de Nevill'.

1020 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.414-479 - cont.

Item Radulfus de Swalewe tenet ibidem xj. partem dimidii feodi unius militis de Roberto de Chaucumbc, et idem Robertus de honore Lancastrie.

Laisseby. Johannes de Nevill' in Leisseby, Swalewe, Magna Cotes et Parva Cotes xx. libratas terre in excambio pro Bere, et tenet in capite de domino rege de veteri feoffamento Johannis Regis.

Hyreby. Johannes de Auneby et Reginaldus de Karlton' tenent in Hyreby feodum unius militis de Johanne de Nevill' de honore Stoccurcy, et idem Johannes de domino rege in capite.

Item Johannes de Wabadun tenet ibidem feodum j. militis de Radulfo de Gousul, et idem Radulfus de honore de Bolingbroc, et com' de eodem loco de domino rege.

Item Johannes de Hak tenet ibidem in Hyreby dimidium feodum militis de constabulario Cestrie, et constabularius de domino rege de honore de Ponte Fracto.

Alesby. Thephanya, Hugo de Harington', prior de Giseburn' [1] tenent ibidem unum feodum militis de Rogero de Lascell', et idem Rogerus de honore de Richemundia.

Item Radulfus de Trehampton' tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis de feodo episcopi de Dureham, et episcopus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Alanus de Benigton' tenet ibidem viij. partem feodi unius militis de Radulfo de Gousul, et idem Radulfus de honore de Bolingbroc.

Heyling'. Ricardus de Heyling' tenet in eadem et in Swalewe, Magna Cotes et in Alesby unum feodum militis de Johanne de Baiocis, et idem Johannes de domino rege in capite.

Item Jollanus de Heyling' tenet ibidem et in Cle j. feodum militis de Johanne de Nevill', et idem Johannes de domino rege in capite de honore de Dovere.

Magna Cotes. Jollanus de Nevill' tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis de Reginaldo de Karlton' et idem Reginaldus de Johanne de Nevill' forestario, et ipse de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Parva Cotes'. Willelmus de Wyflesby tenet in Wyflesby feodum unius militis de comite de Albemarlia, et comes de domino rege in capite.

Bradele. Radulfus de Bradele tenet iiij. partem de villata de Bradele et iiij. partem de villata de Leysseby de domino rege pro xxxviij.s. et viij.d. ad scaccarium annuatim solvendis.

Item Johannes de Kokerington' tenet in Bradele terciam partem ville de domino rege reddendo inde annuatim iiijorm. et xx. fleeches ad scaccarium.

Scaurhou. Comitissa Lincolnie tenet eandem villam de domino rege de socagio.

Cle. Willelmus de Hardredeshull' tenet in Cle et in Utterby dimidium feodum militis de comite Lincolnie, et comes de domino rege in capite.


[1] i.e. Guisborough.
[2] But see p. 1087.

LINCOLN. 1021

II.414-479 - cont.

Item Willelmus filius Drogonis tenet in Cle dimidium feodum militis de Jollano de Hamby, et Jollanus de comite de Arundell', et comes de domino rege in capite.

Item Ricardus de Hal tenet viij. partem militis de Willelmo de Belysby, et Willelmus de episcopo Lincolniensi, et episcopus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Houton'. Comitissa Lincolnie tenet in Houton', Humberstayn et Tetenay tria feoda militum in capite de domino rege.

Item Robertus de Well' tenet in Houton' feodum unius militis de Willelmo de Cantilupo, et idem Willeimus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

WAPENTACIUM DE HAWARDHOU.

Inquisicio facta in wapentacio de Hawardhou per sacramentum horum subscriptorum, scilicet Hamonis de Belisby, Alani de Burnelby, Willelmi Clerici de eadem, Alani de Hadeclive, Reginaldi filii Simonis de Kaburn', Alani le Oysilur, Philippi filii Augeri, Philippi de Briggelle, Stephani Blanchaid', Rogeri filii Wyget', Galfridi ad aulam de Neuton', Alani de Beseby, Rogeri de Thereby et Ricardi de Greynesby, qui dicunt super sacramentum suum quod.

Rowelle. Alanus de Rowelle tenet in eadem et Cukewaud' et Thoryswey duo feoda militum de Johanne de Baiocis, et idem Johannes de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Reginaldus de Karlton' et Johannes de Auneby tenent in eadem dimidium feodum militis de Hugone de Nevill' forestario, et idem Hugo de domino rege de conquestu.

Cukewaud'. Gracia de Insula tenet ibidem nonam partem feodi unius militis de Willelmo Blanchaid, et idem Willelmus de honore de Lancastria.

Item eadem Gracia aliam terram suam de domino rege in capite pro invenire unum servientem in Wales ad preceptum domini regis cum j. hache de veteri feoffamento.

Belysby. Willelmus filius Walteri tenet in eadem in Thurgramby, Ravendale, in Hoi et in Keleby unum feodum militis de Simone de Kyme, et idem Simon de episcopo Lincolniensi, et episcopus de domino rege in capite.

Item Henricus de Capella tenet in Belysby, in Hadeclive, Fenby, et Wathe, et in Waltham de soka de Waltham xxxj. libratas terre et unam marcatam de dono domini Regis Henrici filii Johannis Regis.

Item heres Johannis filii Philippi tenet in Bornelby. Wathe. Waltham de soka de Waltham xxx. libratas de dono domini regis.

Item Willelmus May tenet in Waltham de eadem soka vque libratas terre ut supra de dono domini regis.

Item Henricus filius Regis tenet in Belysby, Halwaldeby, Awardeby, Neuton', Gunnerby, Brigelle, in Askeby et Nortcotes de soka de Waltham xxxj. libratas terre de dono domini regis, set nescitur per quod servicium.

Brigelle. Robertus filius Simonis de Wathe tenet in Brigelle et Wathe iij. partes feodi unius militis de baronia de Croum.

1022 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.414-479 - cont.

Item Ricardus de London' tenet in Brigelle, Wathe et Askeby dimidium feodum militis de constabulario Cestrie, et constabularius de domino rege.

Askeby. Johannes de Santon' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de baronia de Croum de veteri feoffamento.

Greynesby. Robertus de Welle tenet in eadem et Neuton' iij. partes feodi unius militis de honore de Richemundia.

Cateby. Johannes de Cateby, Alanus de Beseby, Radulfus de Beseby, Robertus de Kareby, prior de Ormesby, Alanus de Winceb' tenent in Kateby dimidium feodum militis de honore Richemundie.

Swinehop. Philippus de Chancy tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis de domino rege in capite.

Item idem Philippus tenet ibidem unum feodum militis de honore Richemundie.

Fullstowe. Rogerus de Lascell' tenet in Fullstowe iij. partes feodi unius militis de honore Richemundie.

Item Ead' [1] de Bulebek' tenet ibidem dimidium feodum militis de Roberto Marmiun, et idem Robertus de domino rege in capite de conquestu.

Item Alexander Arsik' tenet in eadem iiij. partem feodi unius militis de comite de Ferrariis, et comes de domino rege in capite.

Item Beatrix que fuit uxor Alani de Normaneby tenet in Fulistouwe et Neuton' unum feodum militis de Waltero Beck', et Walterus de episcopo de Durham, et episcopus de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Estravendale. Agnes Pollard' tenet ibidem terciam partem feodi unius militis de Willelmo le Rat, et Willelmus de honore de Ponte Fracto.

Item Johannes de Santon' tenet in eadem iij. partes feodi unius militis de feodo Croum.

Thorisby. Comes Marescallus tenet Thorisby et in Nortcotes, set nescitur quantum nec per quod servicium.

Kaburn'. Comes Marescallus tenet in Kaburn' et Cokewaud' duo feoda militum de hereditate comitisse uxoris sue in capite de domino rege de conquestu.

Item Thomas de Turribus tenet in eadem iiij. partem feodi unius militis de Normanno de Arcy, et idem Normannus de domino rege de conquestu.

WAPENTACIUM DE LUBURG'.

Inquisicio facta in wapentacio per sacramentum horum subscriptorum, scilicet Radulfi de Hauley, Willelmi de Kyme, Roberti de Hauley, Petri filii decani de Soueham, [2] Reginaldi fratris eius, Roberti Moysand', Martini de Foterby, Haket de Utterby, Hugonis Capun, Roberti filii Alexandri, Willelmi Gallici, Willelmi filii Gilberti de Luburg', qui dicunt super sacramentum suum quod

Luburg'. Rogerus de Clere in Luburg' feodum unius militis et terciam partem feodi unius militis de heredibus Willelmi de Albinaco de baronia, et ipsi de domino rege.


[1] Read Robertus.
[2] Read Coveham.

LINCOLN. 1023

II.414-479 - cont.

Wyum. Willelmus de Wyum tenet ibidem et Ormesby unum feodum militis et dimidium feodum unius militis, excepta quinta parte unius feodi, de episcopo Lincolniensi, et episcopus de baronia de domino rege.

Item Petrus de Wyum tenet ibidem tres partes feodi unius militis de Jollano de Hamby, et idem Jollanus de com' de Arundell', et ipsa de domino rege.

Ormesby. Henricus de Ormesby tenet ibidem xvj. partem feodi unius militis de Johanne de Fribois', et idem Johannes de comite de Aubemar', et comes de rege.

Item Jollanus de Hamby tenet in Ormesby iij. partes feodi unius militis de comite de Arundell', et ipse de domino rege.

Parva Grimesby. Galfridus de Benigwurth' tenet ibidem in Parva Grimesby feodum unius militis de honore de Bolingbroc, et ille honor de domino rege.

Item Simon de Kyme tenet in eadem dimidium feodum unius militis de Ricardo de Percy, barone.

Coveham. Ranullus de Hauleye tenet in Coveham cum terra sua in comitatu Eboraci unum feodum militis de Ricardo de Percy, barone.

Item Willelmus de Kyma tenet in Coveham viij. partem unius militis de Simone de Kyma, et Simon de Ricardo Percy, barone.

Item idem Willelmus de Kyme tenet ibidem duas bovatas terre, unde xxiiij. bovate faciunt feodum unius militis, de Galfrido de Rokeston', et Galfridus de Ricardo Percy, barone.

Foterby. Johannes de Riches tenet in Foterby dimidium feodum militis, excepta una bovata terre, de Waltero Beck', et idem Walterus de episcopo Dunolmensi, barone.

Item Lambertus Ruffus tenet ibidem vtam partem feodi unius militis de priore de Ormesby de feodo Ricardi de Percy, baronis.

Item Walterus de Wildequer tenet ibidem quartam partem feodi unius militis et xxam partem de heredibus Willelmi de Albinaco, barone.

Item Sarra Bertram et Henricus de Leckeburn' tenent in eadem villa iiij. partem feodi unius militis et xxam partem feodi unius militis de Rogero de Clere, et Rogerus de Clere de heredibus Willelmi de Albinaco, barone.

Inquisicio [1] facta in comitatu Lincolnie de scutagio domini regis quot feoda teneantur tam de domino rege in capite quam de aliis qui tenent de domino rege in capite in eodem comitatu et tam de novo feoffamento quam de veteri et per sacramentum proborum et legalium hominum tam militum quam aliorum, scilicet xij. in singulis wapentaciis in eodem comitatu.

KETSTEVENE.

WAPENTACIUM DE FLAXWELLE.

Inquisicio facta in wapentacio de Flaxwelle per sacramentum horum subscriptorum, scilicet Walteri de Amewyc. Galfridi de Rauceby, Ricardi filii Cappellani, Michelis de Amewyc, Willelmi


[1] This appears to have been the original heading to the file of inquisitions fur the whole county.

1024 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.414-479 - cont.

de Amewyc in Riskinton', Willelmi de Lincolnia in eadem, Ricardi filii Johannis de eadem, Rogeri Bray de Esseby, Gilberti Lytherwich de eadem, Roberti le Lavert de Brancewell', Henrici filli Simonis de eadem, et Roberti de Denton' in Templo, qui dicunt super sacramentum suum quod.

Amewyc. Prior de Haverholm tenet in villa de Amewyc tres carucatas terre iij. bovatis et dimidia minus in pura et perpetua elemosina de Matillide de Cauz, et ipsa tenuit de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Walterus de Amewyc tenet in eadem unum feodum railitis de Johanne de Everingham, et idem Johannes de Roberto de Everingham, et idem Robertus de domino rege in capite, et omnes tenent de veteri feoffamento.

Riskinton'. Willelmus Bardull' tenet in Riskinton' feodum unius militis de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Johannes de Everingham tenet in eadem unum feodum militis de Roberto de Everingham de novo feoffamento, et idem Johannes [1] de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Dirington'. Robertus de Dirington' tenet in Dirington' unum feodum militis de Willelmo Bardull', et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite.

Prior de Haverholm tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de dono Radulfi de Hamslap de novo feoffamento.

Idem prior tenet in eadem dimidium feodum de Willelmo de Bovile de novo feoffamento, et Willelmus tenuit de Radulfo de Hamslap, et Radulfus de Roberto de Everingham, et Robertus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento, et dictus prior reddit scutagium Roberto de Everingham, et Robertus domino regi.

Bloxam. Thomas Greylay tenet in Bloxam dimidium feodum militis et quartam partem unius feodi de honore de Lancastria de veteri feoffamento.

Brancewell'. Magister Willelmus de Brancewell' tenet in Brancewell' unum feodum militis de Johanne de Baiocis de veteri feoffamento, et idem Johannes de domino rege in capite.

Item Willelmus de Amewyc tenet in Brancewell' dimidium feodum militis de Willelmo Bardulf de veteri feoffamento, et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite.

Item Alexander de Cressy tenet in eadem et in Dunnysby dimidium feodum militis de Willelmo Bardull' de veteri feoffamento, et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite.

Item fratres Milicie Templi tenet in eadem xiij. bovatas terre de dono Matillidis de Cauz in pura et perpetua elemosina de veteri feoffamento.

Askeby. Jordanus de Esseby tenet in Askeby unum feodum militis de comite de Salesbur' de veteri feoffamento, et idem comes de domino rege, et est de honore de Haya.

Item fratres Milicie Templi tenent in eadem unum feodum militis in puram et perpetuam elemosinam de veteri feoffamento de dono


[1] Read Robertus.

LINCOLN. 1026

II.414-479 - cont.

Simonis Tuschet, set non potest sciri de quo predictus Simon tenuit.

Dygkeby. Willelmus Bardull' tenet in villa de Digby unum feodum militis de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Tilton' tenet in eadem villa de Dygby dimidium feodum militis de Willelmo Bardull' de veteri feoffamento, et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite.

Item Willelmus filius Galfridi tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis de veteri feoffamento de Willelmo Bardull', et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite.

Rouston'. Fratres Milicie Templi tenent in villa de Houston' xij. carucatas terre, prefer quinque bovatas, de novo feoffamento in pura et perpetua elemosina de dono Matillidis de Cauz, et ipsa tenuit de domino rege.

Item Walterus de Colingham tenet in eadem villa de Rouston' quinque bovatas terre de capitulo Lincolnie de dono Matillidis de Cauz.

Item prior de Cattele tenet in Rouston' ij. bovatas terre in puram et perpetuam elemosinam de dono Galfridi de Cauz.

Item Philippus de Rouston' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum militis in puram et perpetuam [1] de Templariis Bruer' de dono Matillidis de Cauz.

Item Ricardus West tenet in eadem sextam partem feodi unius [2] de predictis Templariis Bruer' in puram et perpetuam elemosinam.

Dunnesby. Alexander de Cressy tenet in villa de Dunnesby terciam partem feodi unius militis de veteri feoffamento de Roberto Dayvill', et idem Robertus de Roberto de Everingham, et Robertus de Everingham de domino rege in capite.

Cranewell'. Galfridus Selvayn tenet in villa de Cranewell' de veteri feoffamento viij. partem feodi unius militis de abbate de Ramesey, et idem abbas de domino rege in capite.

Item prior de Sempingham tenet in eadem quartam partem feodi unius militis de Humfrido de Welle de veteri feoffamento, et Humfridus de Galfrido de Enneters, et Galfridus de Gilberto de Gaunt, et Gilbertus de Gaunt de domino rege in capite.

Item Alanus de Cranewell' tenet in eadem dimidium feodum unius militis de veteri feoffamento de fratribus Milicie Templi in puram et perpetuam elemosinam, et predicti fratres habuerunt tenementum de dono Galfridi de Armeters, et ipse Galfridus tenuit de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege in capite.

Nordrouceby. Hospitalarii Sancti Johannis tenent in Nordrouceby dimidium feodum unius militis de Hervico Bagot, et ipse Hervicus de domino rege in capite.

Item Galfridus filius Willelmi tenet in eadem de veteri feoffamento dimidium feodum unius militis de Roberto de Everingham, et Robertus de Everingham de domino rege in capite.

Sutrouceby. Galfridus de Evermue tenet in villa de Sutrouceby de veteri feoffamento terciam partem feodi unius militis [3] de episcopo


[1] After perpetuam, supply elemosinam.
[2] After unius, supply militis.
[3] Unius militis repeated.

1026 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.414-479 - cont.

Duram', et episcopus de herede de Brunne, et ipse heres de domino rege in capite.

Item Rogerus Haket tenet in eadem de veteri feoffamento xij, partem feodi unius militis de Willelmo de Mortayn, et idem Willelmus de episcopo Lincolniensi, et idem episcopus de domino rege in capite.

Item Willelmus Perun tenet in eadem in puram et perpetuam elemosinam de Templariis, set nescitur quantam terram.

Handebek'. Johannes Coleman tenet in villa de Handebek' dimidium feodum militis de veteri feoffamento de Willelmo de Vescy, et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite.

WAPENTACIUM DE AVELUND.

Inquisicio facta in wapentacio de Avelund et per sacramentum horum subscriptorum, scilicet Galfridi filii Joce de Brunne, Walteri de Trikingham, Galfridi de Byrthorp, Radulfi Forestarii de Brunne, Rogeri Bagot de Hacuneby, Ade de Locton', Willelmi de Banham, Alexandri Brun de Grey by, Lamberti de Trikingham, Simonis de Walcote, Eustacii le Franceys, Willelmi de Dembleby, qui dicunt super sacramentum suum quod.

Brunne. Baldewinus filius Hugonis Wake tenet in hundredo de Brunne ix. carucatas terre et iiijor bovatas in dominico de domino rege in capite per servicium militare de veteri feoffamento, set non potest inquiri pro quantis feodis tenet.

Item Willelmus de Poynton' tenet de eodem Baldewyno in eodem hundredo de Brunne et de Morton' viij. partem feodi unius militis de veteri feoffamento, et idem Baldewinus de domino rege in capite.

Item Hugo filius Alfredi tenet de dicto Baldewino in hundredo de Brunne et de Morton' xxam partem feodi unius militis de veteri feoffamento, et idem Baldewinus de domino rege in capite.

Item Joceus filius Jocei Russel tenet de eodem Baldewino in hundredo de Brunne xij. partem feodi unius militis de veteri feoffamento. et idem Baldewinus de domino rege.

Item Johannes filius Hugonis tenet de eodem Baldewino in hundredo de Brunne et de Morton' xx. partem feodi unius militis de veteri feoffamento, et idem Baldewinus de domino rege.

Item Galfridus filius Jocei de Brunne tenet in hundredo de Brunne terciam partem feodi unius militis de Radulfo de Gousul, et idem Radulfus de feodo Johannis de Baiocis. et idem Johannes de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus de Wasteneys tenet in hundredo de Brunne terciam partem feodi unius militis de Baldewino Wake, et idem Baldewinus de heredibus Hervici de Stafford' de veteri feoffamento, et predicti heredes de domino rege.

Item abbas de Brunne tenet in hundredo de Brunne unam bovatam terre et dimidiam de Hugone de Cassingtorp de novo feoffamento, et idem Hugo de Lamberto de Moleton', et idem Lambertus de heredibus de Clinton', et ipsi heredes de domino rege in capite.

Item Willelmus de Kyrketon' tenet de novo feoffamento in hundredo de Brunne unam bovatam terre et dimidiam de Alexandre de Hypbetoft. et idem Alexander de Waltero Beck', et idem Walterus

LINCOLN. 1027

II.414-479 - cont.

de Lamberto de Moleton', et idem Lambertus de heredibus de Clinton', et ipsi heredes de domino rege in capite, et quando scutagium ad xl.s. pertinet ad bovatam terre j.d.

Morton'. Baldewinus Wake tenet in hundredo de Morton' iiijor bovatas terre de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento, et quando scutagium est ad xl.s. quelibet bovata dat viij.d.

Item Hugo filius Aufrey et Geraddus filius Simonis tenent in hundredo de Morton' iiij. partem feodi unius militis de veteri feoffamento, et idem Hugo tenet porcionem suam de Baldewino Wak', et idem Baldewinus de heredibus Radulfi de Morton', et ipsi heredes de domino rege, et predictus Gerardus tenet porcionem suam de domino rege.

Hacuneby. Willelmus filius Walteri tenet in hundredo de Hacuneby de domino rege in capite decimam partem feodi unius militis de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus Bagot tenet in Hacuneby v. partem feodi unius militis de heredibus Hervici de Stafford', et ipsi de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Johannes Gumbaud' tenet in Hacuneby et Repinghal' feodum unius militis de veteri feoffamento de Baldewino Wake, et idem Baldewinus de domino rege.

Dunnesby. Willelmus de Morton' tenet in hundredo de Dunnesby et de Morton' de veteri feoffamento feodum unius militis de episcopo Lincolniensi, et idem episcopus de domino rege.

Ringisdon'. Hugo de Ringisdon' tenet in hundredo de Ringisdon' et de Dunnesby dimidium feodum militis, excepta vicesima parte, de episcopo Lincolniensi, et idem episcopus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Repinghal'. Johannes Gumbaud tenet in hundredo de Repinghale de novo feoffamento feodum unius militis et dimidii de Petronilla de Croum, et ipsa de domino rege.

Item Johannes filius Hugonis tenet in eodem hundredo dimidium feodum militis de feodo Johannis de Baiocis, et idem Johannes de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Radulfus filius Ricardi tenet in eodem hundredo iiij. partem feodi unius militis de Simone de Roppele, et idem Simon cle heredibus Willelmi de Albinaco, et ipsi heredes de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Alakeby. Alina la Marescall' et Rogerus de Cressy tenent in Aslakeby hundredo dimidium feodum unius militis de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Johannes Hauteyn tenet in eodem hundredo iiijor bovatas terre de Roberto Hauteyn, et idem Robertus de Roberto de Thorp, et Robertus de Thorp de Henrico Camerario, et idem Henricus de Petronilla de Croum, et ipsa de domino rege, et quando scutagium est ad xl.s. quelibet bovata dat vj.d.

Duseby et Greyby. Hugo filius Radulfi de Lavinton' tenet in hundredo de Duseby et Greyby feodum unius militis de archiepiscopo Eboracensi de veteri feoffamento, et ipse archiepiscopus de domino rege.

1028 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.414-479 - cont.

Item Willelmus Marescallus tenet in eodem hundredo xxam partem conll feodi unius militis de Willelmo de Poynton', et idem Willelmus de Petronilla de Croum, et ipsa de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Johannes filius Thome et Templarii tenent de novo feoffamento in eodem hundredo iij. partem feodi unius militis de Willelmo de Poynton', et idem Willelmus de Petronilla de Croum, et ipsa de domino rege.

Poynton'. Willelmus de Poynton' tenet in hundredo de Poynton' feodum unius militis de Petronilla de Croum, et ipsa de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Poynton' tenet in eodem hundredo de Poynton' et Aslakeby dimidium feodum militis de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Kyrkeby. Johannes filius Hugonis tenet in Kyrkeby xviij. partem feodi unius militis de Gilberto de Sancto Laudo, et idem Gilbertus de Johanne de Baiocis, et idem Johannes de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus de Thorp tenet in Kyrkeby unam carucatam terre de veteri feoffamento de Gilberto de Sancto Laudo, et idem Gilbertus de Johanne de Baiocia, et idem Johannes de domino rege, et quando scutagium est ad xl.a. quellbet bovata dat vj.d., et est de veteri feoffamento.

Byrthorp. Galfridus de Byrthorp tenet in hundredo de Birthorp viij. partem feodi unius militis de veteri feoffamento de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege.

Bylingburg'. Heredes Richeri de Bylingburg' et heres Rogeri de Bukeminstr' tenent in hundredo de Bylingburg' feodum unius militis de Willelmo de Lungkespee, et ipse de domino rege.

Horbling'. Robertus filius Roberti de Horbling' tenet in hundredo de Horbling' duas partes feodi unius militis de honore Britannie de veteri feoffamento de Petro de Sabadia, et ipse de domino rege.

Item idem Robertus tenet in eodem hundredo de veteri feoffamento quatuor partes feodi unius militis de Willelmo Lungkespee, et idem Willelmus de domino rege.

Item prior de Sempingham et parcenarii sui tenent de novo feoffamento dimidium feodum unius militis in eodem hundredo de archiepiscopo Eboracensi, et idem archiepiscopus de domino rege in capite.

Swaueton'. Willelmus Lungkespee tenet in Swaueton' in dominico ix. carucatas terre et ij. bovatas de domino rege per servicium militare de veteri feoffamento, set non potest inquiri pro quantis feodis tenet.

Item Willelmus le Latimer tenet in Swaueton' ij. bovatas terre de Willelmo de Vescy, et idem Willelmus de domino rege, et quelibet bovata dat viij.d. et iij. quadrantes quando scutagium est ad xl.s., et sunt de veteri feoffamento.

Spanneby. Johannes filius Willelmi Filiot tenet in Spanneby dimidium feodum unius militis de Cristiana Ledet, et ipsa de Willelmo Lungkespee. et ipse Willelmus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

LINCOLN. 1020

II.414-479 - cont.

Oubemeby et Trikingham. Robertus de Neuton' tenet in Oubemeby et in Trikingham tres partes feodi unius militis de Willelmo Lungkespee, et idem Willelmus de Willelmo de Pojnton', et Willelmus de Poynton' de Petronilla de Croum, et ipsa de domino rege.

Item Hugo Bussey, Philippus de Arcy, Johannes de Somercotes, Ricardus de Saltfleteby tenent in Oubemeby dimidium feodum unius militis de Simone de Kyme, et idem Simon de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Wylugby et Oubemeby. Simon de Nevill' et Petrus de Cormery tenent in hundredo de Wyluby et de Oubemeby duas partes feodi unius militis de Michaele Belet, et idem Michael de Cristiana Ledet, et ipsa de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Dembelby. Henricus de Leckeburn' tenet in Dembleby quartam partem feodi unius militis de Willelmo de Dyve, et ipse de Gilberto de Gaunt, et Gilbertus de Gaunt de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item idem Henricus tenet in eadem villa de Dembleby iiijtam decimam partem feodi unius militis de Henrico Camerario, et idem Henricus de Petronilla de Croum, et ipsa de domino rege. de veteri feoffamento.

Item Willelmus de Dembelby tenet in eadem vtam partem feodi unius militis de veteri feoffamento de Willelmo de Lungkespee, et ipse de domino rege.

Trikingham. Walterus de Trikingham tenet in hundredo de Trikingham vtam partem feodi unius militis de Roberto Marmyun, et idem Robertus de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Johannes Gumbaud' tenet vque bovatas, et ad scutagium xl. solidorum quelibet bovata dat x.d., et tenet de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Walterus de Trikingham tenet in Trikingham xx. partem feodi unius militis de Gilberto de Gaunt, et ipse de domino rege de veteri feoffamento, et est de dominico Gilberti de Gaunt.

Pycwurth'. Hugo de Picwurth' tenet in hundredo de Pycwurth' dimidium feodum unius militis, excepta xxma parte, de Willelmo Lungkespee, et ipse de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

Item Robertus Coffyn tenet in eadem terciam partem feodi unius militis de Radulfo de Amundevill', et idem Radulfus de episcopo Dunolmensi, et ipse cle domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Walterus de Trikingham tenet in eodem decimam partem feodi unius militis de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de Gaunt de domino rege de veteri feoffamento, et est de dominico Gilberti de Gaunt.

Hasceby. Robertus Durvye tenet in Asceby quartam partem feodi unius militis de Willelmo de Dyve, et idem Willelmus de Gilberto de Gaunt, et ipse de rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item idem Robertus et Robertus de Thorp tenent in eadem villa de Asceby iiij. partem feodi unius militis de Theobaudo de Stykeswaud' et idem Theobaudus de Willelmo Lungespe, et idem Willelmus de domino rege in capite.

1030 A.D. 1242-1243.

II.414-479 - cont.

Item Robertus de Thorp tenet in eadem xam partem feodi unius militis de Henrico Camerario, et idem Henricus de Petronilla de Croum, et ipsa de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Neuton'. Robertus de Neuton' tenet in Neuton' et in Trikingham dimidium feodum militis de veteri feoffamento de Willelmo de Lungespe, et ipse de domino rege.

Item Thomas de Neuton' tenet in Neuton' et Trikingham et Usebv dimidium feodum unius militis de veteri feoffamento de Roberto de Neuton', et idem Robertus de Willelmo de Lungespe, et idem Willelmus de domino rege.

Item Willelmus Pedechen tenet in Neuton' et Trikingham de veteri feoffamento vj. partem feodi unius militis de Henrico Camerario, et idem Henricus de feodo de Croum, et heres de Croum de domino rege.

Walcot. Agnes de Walcot tenet in Walcot iiijor partes feodi unius militis de abbate de Burgo, et abbas de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Item Simon de Nevill' et Walterus filius Rogeri et parcenarii eorum tenent in eadem vj. partem feodi unius militis de Gilberto de Gaunt, et idem Gilbertus de domino rege de veteri feoffamento.

Fukingham. Gilbertus de Gaunt tenet in Fukingham xij. carucatas terre, exceptis iiij. bovatis terre quas prior de Sempingham et abbas de Bardeneya tenent, et idem Gilbertus tenet predictas xij. carucatas terre de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento, et est capitale manerium baronie sue in comitatu Lincolnie, set non potest inquiri pro quot feodis.

Locton'. Adam de Locton' tenet in Locton' et Aslakeby dimidium feodum unius militis de Hugone Ringisdon', et idem Hugo de Baldewino Wake, et idem Baldewinus de domino rege in capite de veteri feoffamento.

WAPENTACIUM DE ASWARDBURN'.[1]

Inquisicio facta in wapentacio de Aswardburn'1 per sacramentum horum subscriptorum, scillcet Hugonis de Sancto Vedasto, Alexandri de Lafford', Roberti de Hekinton', Willelmi filii Jordani, Laurencii de Huwelle, Rogeri de Kelleby, Willelmi de Kelleby, Thome de eadem, Philippi de Ouneby, Michaells de Thorp, Elye de Camera, et Willelmi Pylat, qui dicunt super sacramentum suum quod.

Kelleby. Galfridus de Evermue tenet in Kelleby dimidium feodum unius militis de veteri feoffame